Lec02 Ae Ms14
Lec02 Ae Ms14
1
Local density of the inversion-
layer charge is proportional to
VGS − V(x) − VTH
Thus, if V(x) approaches
VGS − VTH then Qd (x) drops
to zero.
If VDS is slightly greater than VGS − VTH,
then the inversion layer stops at x ≤ L
How does the device conduct current
in the presence of pinch-off?
2
As the electrons approach the pinch-off point (where Qd → 0), their
velocity rises tremendously (v = I /Qd ).
Upon passing the pinch-off point, the electrons simply shoot through
the depletion region near the drain junction and arrive at the drain
terminal.
3
The integral on the left-hand side of (2.7) must be taken from x = 0 to
x = L’, where L’ is the point at which Qd drops to zero, and that on the
right from V(x) = 0 to V(x) = VGS − VTH. As a result,
“square-law”
The negative sign appears here because we assume that ID flows from
the drain to the source, whereas holes flow in the reverse direction.
Since the value of VDS with respect to VGS − VTH determines the region
of operation, we draw the line VDS = VGS − VTH in the plane, as shown
in Fig. 2.18. If VDS > VGS − VTH then the region above
the line corresponds to saturation
6
Chap04-Sedra Smith
7
VDS = VGS − VTH
VD - VS = VG - VS − VTH
VD = VG − VTH
VTH = VG − VD
VD > VG − VTH
VTH > VG − VD
pinch-off occurs
Chap04-Sedra Smith
11
MOS Transconductance
Define a figure of merit that indicates how well a device converts
a voltage to a current
Chap04-Sedra Smith
12
13
The ID and VGS − VTH terms in the above gm equations are bias values.
For example, a transistor with W/L = 5 μm/0.1 μm and biased at ID =
0.5 mA may exhibit a transconductance of (1/200 ).
If a signal is applied to the device, then ID and VGS − VTH and hence gm
vary, but in small-signal analysis, we assume that the signal amplitude
is small enough that this variation is negligible.
For a PFET, the transconductance in the saturation region is
expressed as
Chap04-Sedra Smith
14
Example 2.3
For the arrangement shown in Fig. 2.21, plot the transconductance as a
function of VDS.
15
ID gm
62.5E-6 250.0E-6
0.000250
0.000200
0.000150
0.000100
0.000050 gm VDS
0.000000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Second-Order Effects Our analysis of the MOS structure has thus
far entailed various simplifying assumptions,
Body Effect
some of which are not valid in many analog
circuits.
17
Suppose VS = VD = 0, and VG is somewhat less than VTH
Depletion region is formed under the gate but no inversion layer exists
19
1.00E-04
9.00E-05
8.00E-05
7.00E-05
Vx vs ID 6.00E-05
5.00E-05
4.00E-05
3.00E-05
2.00E-05
1.00E-05
0.00E+00
-5 -4 -3 CMOS IC by Razavi Ch02
-2 -1 0 20
The bulk potential, Vsub, need not change:
if the source voltage varies with respect to Vsub, the same
phenomenon occurs.
Fig. 2.25(a), first ignoring body effect.
We note that as Vin varies, Vout closely follows the input because the
drain current remains equal to I1.
We can write
22
Example 2.5 Equation (2.23) suggests that if VSB becomes negative,
then VTH decreases. Is this correct?
If the bulk voltage of an NMOS device rises above its source voltage,
VTH falls below VTH0.
This observation proves useful in low-voltage design, where the
performance of a circuit may suffer due to a high threshold voltage;
one can bias the bulk to reduce VTH.
Unfortunately, this is not straightforward for NFETs because they
typically share one substrate, but it can readily be applied to
individual FETs.
Channel-Length Modulation
The actual length of the channel gradually decreases as the potential
difference between the gate and the drain decreases.
Lꞌ is in fact a function of VDS.
26
28
Example 2.7 Keeping all other parameters constant, plot the ID/VDS
characteristic of a MOSFET for L = L1 and L = 2L1.
ΔL/L = λVDS
If the length is doubled, the slope of ID vs. VDS is divided by four
Example 2.9
Draw the layout of the circuit shown in Fig. 2.30(a).
37
MOS Device Capacitances
38
(1) the oxide capacitance between the gate and the channel,
C1 = WLCox;
(2) the depletion capacitance between the channel and the substrate,
C2 = WL √qϵsi Nsub/(4φF ); and
(3) the capacitance due to the overlap of the gate poly with the source
and drain areas, C3 and C4. Owing to fringing electric field lines, C3
and C4 cannot be simply written as WLDCox, and are usually obtained
by more elaborate calculations. The overlap capacitance per unit
width is denoted by Cov and expressed in F/m (or fF/μm).We simply
multiply Cov by W to find the gate-source and gate-drain overlap
capacitances.
(4) The junction capacitance between the source/drain areas and the
substrate. As shown in Fig. 2.32(b), this last capacitance is
decomposed into two components:
39
the bottom-plate capacitance associated with the bottom of the
junction, Cj , and the sidewall capacitance due to the perimeter of
the junction, Cjsw. The distinction is necessary because different
transistor geometries yield different area and perimeter values for
the S/D junctions. We specify Cj and Cjsw as capacitance per unit
area (in F/m2) and unit length (in F/m), respectively. Thus, Cj is
multiplied by the S/D area, and Cjsw by the S/D perimeter. Note that
each junction capacitance can be expressed as Cj = Cj0/[1 +
VR/(B)]m, where VR is the reverse voltage across the junction, B is
the junction built-in potential, and m is a power typically in the
range of 0.3 and 0.4.
41
42
Example 2.10 Calculate the source and drain junction capacitances of
the two structures shown in Fig. 2.33.
43
If the device is off, CGD = CGS = CovW, and
the gate-bulk capacitance consists of the series combination of the
gate-oxide capacitance and the depletion-region capacitance
[Fig.2.32(a)], i.e
44
Let us now consider CGD and CGS. If in saturation, a MOSFET exhibits a
gate-drain capacitance roughly equal to WCov. As for CGS, we note that
the potential difference between the gate and the channel varies
from VGS at the source to VTH at the pinch-off point, resulting in a
nonuniform vertical electric field in the gate oxide as we travel from
the source to the drain. It can be proved that the equivalent
capacitance of this structure, excluding the gate-source overlap
capacitance, equals (2/3)WLCox . Thus, CGS = 2WLeffCox/3+WCov. The
behavior of CGD and CGS in different regions of operation is plotted in
Fig. 2.34. Note that the above equations do not provide a smooth
transition from one region of operation to another, creating
convergence difficulties in simulation programs. This issue is revisited
in Chapter 17. The gate-bulk capacitance is usually neglected in the
triode and saturation regions because the inversion layer acts as a
“shield” between the gate and the bulk. In other words, if the gate
voltage varies, the charge is supplied by the source and the drain
rather than the bulk.
Example 2.11
Sketch the capacitances of M1 in Fig. 2.35 as VX varies from zero to 3 V.
Assume that VTH = 0.3 V and λ = γ = 0.
46
MOS Small-Signal Model
typically
around 0.25.
incremental body effect becomes
less pronounced as VSB increases.
48
We note that folding reduces the gate resistance by a factor of four.
49
Shown in Fig. 2.39, the complete small-signal model includes the
device capacitances as well.
50
Example 2.12
Sketch gm and gmb of M1 in Fig. as a function of the bias current I1.
52
53
54
NMOS Versus PMOS Devices
In most CMOS technologies, PMOS devices are quite inferior to NMOS
transistors.
For example, due to the lower mobility of holes,
μpCox ≈ 0.5μnCox, yielding low current drive and transconductance.
Moreover, for given dimensions and bias currents, NMOS transistors
exhibit a higher output resistance, providing more ideal current
sources and higher gain in amplifiers.
For these reasons, incorporating NFETs rather than PFETs wherever
possible is preferred.
Long-Channel Versus Short-Channel Devices
In this chapter, we have employed a very simple view of MOSFETs so
as to understand the basic principles of their operation.
Most of our treatment is valid for “long-channel” devices, e.g.,
transistors having a minimum length of a few microns.
Many of the relationships derived here must be reexamined and
revised for short-channel MOSFETs.
Furthermore, the SPICE models necessary for simulation of today’s
devices are much more sophisticated than the Level 1 model.
For example, the intrinsic gain, gmrO, calculated from the device
parameters in Table 2.1 is much higher than actual values.
These issues are studied in Chapter 17.
We begin with a simplistic view of devices.
The key point is that the simple model provides a great deal of
intuition that is necessary in analog design.
We often encounter a trade-off between intuition and rigor, and our
approach is to establish the intuition first and gradually complete our
understanding so as to achieve rigor as well.
FinFETs
This device exhibits superior
performance as channel lengths fall
below approximately 20 nm.
In fact, FinFET I/V characteristics
are closer to square-law behavior,
making our simple large-signal
mode relevant again.
The equivalent channel width is
therefore equal to the sum of the fin’s
width, WF , and twice its height, HF :
W = WF +2HF .
Typically, WF ≈ 6 nm and HF ≈ 50 nm.
57
Behavior of a MOS Device as a Capacitor
Inversion layer begins to form for VGS ≈ VTH.
We also noted that for 0 < VGS < VTH, the
device operates in the subthreshold region.