0% found this document useful (0 votes)
172 views16 pages

Scott CH 3

ppt scott ch 3

Uploaded by

RATNIDA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
172 views16 pages

Scott CH 3

ppt scott ch 3

Uploaded by

RATNIDA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Chapter 3

The Decision Usefulness


Approach to Financial
Reporting

3-1
Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada
Chapter 3
The Decision Usefulness Approach to Financial Reporting

3-2
Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada
3.2 The Decision Usefulness
Approach
• It is the investor’s responsibility to make
investment decisions
• Role of financial reporting is to supply
information that is useful for this purpose
• To prepare useful information, the accountant
must know how investors make decisions

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3-3


3.3 The Rational Decision Theory
Model
• A model of rational decision making in the face of
uncertainty
– Definition of rationality?
• A game against nature: “nature does not think”
• Other ways to make decisions?

» Continued

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3-4


3.3 The Rational Decision Theory
Model (continued)
• Role of the rational decision theory model in
financial reporting
– Helps us understand how financial statement
information helps investors to make investment
decisions
– Captures average investor behaviour?

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3-5


Bayes’ Theorem

• A device to revise state probabilities upon


receipt of new evidence
– Θ is state of nature
– m is message received
– P(θ) is prior probability of θ (subjective)
• Formula
P Pm /  
P / m 
 Pm /  P 

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3-6


Bayes’ Theorem Applied to
Accounting Information
• θ is state of firm
θ1 = H = high future firm performance
θ2 = L = low future firm performance
• m is evidence received from the financial statements
m1 = GN = net income shows good news
m2 = BN = net income shows bad news
• Suppose GN is received:

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3-7


3.3.2 The Information System I
Shows Evidence Probabilities, Conditional on
Each State, for Input into Bayes’ Theorem

Current Financial Statement Total


Evidence
GN BN

H P(GH/H) P(BN/H) 1
State of
Nature
L P(GN/L) P(BN/L) 1

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3-8


The Information System II

• The higher the main diagonal probabilities, the better


the investor can predict the state of nature (i.e., future
firm performance)
– The main diagonal probabilities capture financial statement
informativeness
– Highly informative financial statements also called:
• Transparent
• Precise
• High quality

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3-9


The Information System III

• Information system probabilities are objective


– Reflect quality of GAAP
– How known by investor?
• Prior probabilities are subjective
– Investor assesses them based on all information
available prior to the investment decision

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3 - 10


The Information System IV

• If prior probabilities are subjective, so are


posterior probabilities
– However, if financial statement information is
informative, posterior probabilities are better predictors
of future firm performance than prior probabilities

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3 - 11


3.3.3 Definition of Information

• Information is evidence that has the potential to


affect an individual’s decision

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3 - 12


Theory of Investment

• Points to note:
– The rational investor
– Risk aversion
– Portfolio diversification
– beta

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3 - 13


3.8 Do Professional Accounting
Bodies Accept the Rational Decision
Theory?
• SFAC 1
– Oriented to investors
– Oriented to rational investment decisions
– Accepts that investors are risk averse
– Financial statements provide information to help
investors assess (posterior probabilities of) the
amounts, timing, and uncertainty of investment
proceeds (i.e., of future firm performance)
• Note that Bayes’ theorem is implied

» Continued

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3 - 14


3.8 Do Professional Accounting
Bodies Accept the Rational Decision
Theory? (continued)
• SFAC 2
– To help investors, financial statement information
should be:
• Relevant
– Can “make a difference”
• Reliable
– Faithful representation
– Verifiable
– Neutral

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3 - 15


Conclusions

• Rational decision theory provides a theoretical


underpinning for study of information needs of
investors
• Conceptual framework SFAC 1 and SFAC 2
accept the rational decision theory model

Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 3 - 16

You might also like