04 KM Models
04 KM Models
Models
Understanding Knowledge
• a systemic and organizationally specified process for acquiring, organizing,
and communicating both tacit and explicit knowledge of employees so
that other employees may make use of it to be more effective and
productive in their work. (Alavi and Leidner, 1999)
Multimedia
Explicit = Media-based
Digitally-Indexed
Written down
Digitally-Active
Intellectual Property ©Patents
™ (sm)
Groups
KM “Transactions”
The bridge between the problem you’re trying to solve and the selection of which KM enabler to use.
Knowledge Required
People Media-based
Computer-based training
Semantic search Archiving
Media-
based Web Sites
AskMe Library
Scanning Systems
Tacit Knowledge Capture
ACCESSING CONVERTING
(transfer & utilize) (organize & transfer)
Phases of Knowledge Creation
Signals
perceiving interpreting understanding justifying
Sharer Receiver
Develop Capture
Resource
Use Knowledge
Create Knowledge
Distribute Organize
Manage Knowledge
Process View of Knowledge Management
Capture Define the Resource Create the Resource Organize
Knowledge Knowledge
Manage the Resource
Store
Manage Knowledge
12
Knowledge Transfer Via Teams
Initial
knowledge
Outcome is
realized
Team performs
a job Outcome
compared to
action
New knowledge
reusable by same
team on next job
New experience/
Knowledge knowledge gained
captured and
codified in a
form usable by
others
Fig. 4.1
Impediments to knowledge
sharing
Personality
Compensation Organizational
Recognition culture
Ability utilization
Creativity Vocational
Good work environment reinforcers Knowledge
Autonomy sharing
Job security
Moral values
Attitude
Advancement
Variety Company
Achievement strategies and
Independence policies
Social status Work Norms
14
Impediments to Knowledge
Sharing
• Personality
• Attitude based on mutual trust
• Vocational reinforcers
• Work norms
15
Knowledge Management Models
• Models provide a way of translating managerial activities and
guiding managerial efforts in managing knowledge in the
organizations.
• KM models have evolved over time
• Models
– Boisot’s Knowledge Category Models
– Nonaka’s Knowledge Management Model
– Hedlund and Nonaka’s Knowledge Management Model
– Skandia Intellectual Capital Model of Knowledge Management
– Demerest’s Knowledge Management Model
– Frid’s Knowledge Management Model
– Stankosky and Baldanza’s Knowledge Management Framework
– Kogut and Zander’s Knowledge Management Model
• A constant shift from categorical view to the more
complicated and complex mechanistic and socially
constructed perspective.
NONAKA’S MODEL
• Tacit to tacit communication (socialization).
Experience among people in face-to-face meetings
• Tacit to explicit communication (externalization).
Articulation among people through dialog
• Explicit to explicit communication (communication).
Best supported by technology
• Explicit to tacit communication (internalization).
Taking explicit knowledge and deducing new ideas
17
Nonaka’s Model
18
KNOWLEDGE ARCHITECTURE
• People core: Evaluate current documents
people use
• Identify knowledge centers
• The technical core: The total technology
required to operate the knowledge
environment
People Content
Technology
19
Technical Layer of the KM System
1 User Interface
(Web browser software installed on each user’s PC)
Knowledge-enabling applications
4 (customized applications, skills directories, videoconferencing, decision support systems,
group decision support systems tools)
Transport
5 (e-mail, Internet/Web site, TCP/IP protocol to manage traffic flow)
Middleware
6 (specialized software for network management, security, etc.)
21
Technical Access Layer
• Intranet: The internal network of
communication systems modified around the
Internet
• Extranet: An intranet with extensions that
allow clearly identified customers or suppliers
to reach company-related technical
educational information (see Figure 4.9)
22
Technical Access Layer
Internet Intranet
Extranet
Cloud Company employees
Suppliers
Vendors
Partners
PUBLIC Customers
AT LARGE
25
Criteria for an Effective
Collaborative Layer
• Security—very critical
• Portability across platforms
• Integration with existing systems
• Scalability, flexibility, and ease of use
26
Expert Systems
• Emulate the reasoning of a human expert in a
problem domain
• Can help a person become wiser, not just better
informed
Components include:
• Justifier: explains how and why an answer is given
• Inference engine: problem-solving mechanism for
reasoning and inferencing
• Scheduler: coordinates and controls rule processing
(See Fig. 4.12)
27
Knowledge-Enabling Application
Layer
• Often referred to as value-added layer
• Creates a competitive edge for the learning
organization
• Provides knowledge bases, discussion databases,
sales force automation tools, imaging tools, etc.
• Ultimate goal: show how knowledge sharing
could improve the lot of employees
28
Transport Layer
• Most technical layer to implement
• Ensures that the company will become a
network of relationships
• Includes LANs, WANs, intranets, extranets,
and the Internet
• Considers multimedia, URLs, graphics,
connectivity speeds, and bandwidths
29
Middleware Layer
• Focus on interfacing with legacy systems and
programs residing on other platforms
• Designer should address databases and applications
with which KM system interfaces
• Contains a cluster of programs to provide
connections between legacy applications and existing
systems
• Makes it possible to connect between old and new
data formats
30
Repositories Layer
• Bottom layer in the KM architecture
• Represents the physical layer where
repositories are installed
• Includes intelligent data warehouses, legacy
applications, operational databases, and
special applications for security and traffic
management
31
Build In-House, Buy, or
Outsource?
• Trend is toward ready-to-use, generalized
software packages
• Outsourcing is also a trend, releasing
technological design to outsiders
• Regardless of choice, it is important to set criteria
for the selection
• Question of who owns the KM system should be
seriously considered
32