0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views22 pages

One-Dimensional Continuous Groups

This document discusses continuous one-dimensional groups and their representations. It begins by introducing the rotation group SO(2) and its generator. SO(2) has a single generator J that determines the irreducible representations of SO(2). The representations are labeled by an integer m and take the form Um(φ) = e-imφ. The document also discusses finding an invariant integration measure on the group to satisfy rearrangement theorems and establish orthonormality and completeness relations.

Uploaded by

sunsukurian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views22 pages

One-Dimensional Continuous Groups

This document discusses continuous one-dimensional groups and their representations. It begins by introducing the rotation group SO(2) and its generator. SO(2) has a single generator J that determines the irreducible representations of SO(2). The representations are labeled by an integer m and take the form Um(φ) = e-imφ. The document also discusses finding an invariant integration measure on the group to satisfy rearrangement theorems and establish orthonormality and completeness relations.

Uploaded by

sunsukurian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

6.

One-Dimensional Continuous Groups

6.1 The Rotation Group SO(2)


6.2 The Generator of SO(2)
6.3 Irreducible Representations of SO(2)
6.4 Invariant Integration Measure, Orthonormality and
Completeness Relations
6.5 Multi-Valued Representations
6.6 Continuous Translational Group in One Dimension
6.7 Conjugate Basis Vectors
Introduction
• Lie Group, rough definition:
Infinite group that can be parametrized smoothly &
analytically.
• Exact definition:
A differentiable manifold that is also a group.
• Linear Lie groups = Classical Lie groups
= Matrix groups
E.g. O(n), SO(n), U(n), SU(n), E(n), SL(n), L, P, …
• Generators, Lie algebra
• Invariant measure
• Global structure / Topology
6.1. The Rotation Group SO(2)

2-D Euclidean space E2  span  e1 , e2 


Rotations about origin O by angle  :
R   e1  e1 cos  e2 sin 
R   e2  e1 sin   e2 cos

 cos   sin  
R   ei  e j R   R    
j
i
 sin  cos  

 cos   sin  
 R   e R   e2    e1 e2  
cos  
 sin 
1
x  ei x i  x  E2

R   : E2  E2
x  R   x  R   ei x i  e j R   i x i  e j x j
j
by x

x  j  R  
j
 i
xi
Rotation is length preserving:
x  x j xj  R   x i R   j xk  x  x i xi
2 j k 2
i

R   i R   j   i k R   RT    E 
j k

det R     1 i.e., R() is special orthogonal. SO  2    R   


If O is orthogonal, O OT  E  OT O

det O det OT  det O   1


2
 det O   1
O  n    All n  n orthogonal matrices 
Theorem 6.1:
There is a 1–1 correspondence between rotations in En & SO(n) matrices.

Proof: see Problem 6.1

Geometrically: R 2  R 1   R 1  2   R 1  R 2 

and R  2 n     R    nZ

Theorem 6.2: 2-D Rotational Group R2 = SO(2)

R2  SO  2 is an Abelian group under matrix multiplication with

identity element E  R   0

and inverse R1    R     R  2   


Proof: Straightforward.

SO(2) is a Lie group of 1 (continuous) parameter 


SO(2) group manifold
6.2. The Generator of SO(2)
Lie group: elements connected to E can be acquired by a few generators.

For SO(2), there is only 1 generator J defined by


R  d  0   E  i d J J is a 22 matrix

R() is continuous function of  


d R  
R   d  R    d
d
 R   R  d   R    i d R   J

d R  
  i R   J with R  0  E
d
Theorem 6.3: Generator J of SO(2)

R    ei  J
Comment:
• Structure of a Lie group ( the part that's connected to E ) is
determined by a set of generators.
• These generators are determined by the local structure near E.
• Properties of the portions of the group not connected to E are
determined by global topological properties.

 cos d  sin d   1 d 


R  d     E  i d J
 sin d cos d   d
 1 

  0 i 
J   y Pauli matrix
 i 0 
J is traceless, Hermitian, & idempotent ( J2 = E )
   2 j     2 j 1
 j  j 1

R    ei  J  E i  J
j  0  2 j ! j  1  2 j  1 !

 cos   sin  
 E cos   i J sin  
 sin  cos  
6.3. IRs of SO(2)
Let U() be the realization of R() on V.
 U 2 U 1   U 1  2   U 1  U 2  U  2 n     U  

U  d   E  i d  J U    e i  J

U() unitary  J Hermitian


SO(2) Abelian  All of its IRs are 1-D

The basis |   of a minimal invariant subspace under SO(2) can


be chosen as
J     so that U      e i  

U  2 n     U    e i  2 n     e i      m Z
IR Um : J m  m m U m   m  m e i  m

m = 0: U 0    1  Identity representation
m = 1: U 1    ei  SO(2) mapped clockwise onto unit circle in C plane
m = 1: U 1    e i  … counterclockwise …

m = n: U  n    e i n
SO(2) mapped n times around unit circle in C plane

Theorem 6.4: IRs of SO(2)


Single-valued IRs of SO(2) are given by U m    e i m  m Z

Only m = 1 are faithful

 cos   sin  
Representation R      is reducible
 sin  cos  
 0 i  1
J   has eigenvalues 1 with eigenvectors e   e1  i e2 
 i 0  2

 J e   e R   e   e e i
R  U 1  U 1
Problem 6.2
6.4. Invariant Integration Measure,
Orthonormality & Completeness Relations
Finite group g  Continuous group  dg
Issue 1: Different parametrizations
f  g    dφ f  g  φ  dφ  d1 d n
Let G = { g() } & define  d g

where  = ( 1, …n ) & f is any complex-valued function of g.

Changing parametrization to  = (), we have,


ξ
 d ξ f  g  ξ    dφ  φ f  g  φ  ξ  1 , , n 

 φ  1 , , n 
  dφ f  g  φ 

Remedy: Introduce weight : d g    φ dφ

so that  d ξ   ξ  f  g  ξ    dφ  φ f  g φ  analytic ξ  φ & f


ξ
   φ   ξ  φ  
φ
( Notation changed ! )
Issue 2: Rearrangement Theorem

d g f  g    d g f  g g   g   g  ξ g   G

G G

Since  d g f  g    1
d g f  g g    d gg f  g g  M G
M g M M

R.T. is satisfied by setting M = G if dg is (left) invariant, i.e.,

d g  d g  g  g  G

Let d g    ξ g  d ξ g

 d g g    ξ g g  d ξ g g g  ξ g g   g  ξ g   g  ξ g 

d g  d g g    ξ g  d ξ g    ξ g g  d ξ g g
  0  d ξ e    ξ g  d ξ g  g  e, ξe  0 
From g  ξ g g   g  ξ g   g  ξ g  one can determine the (vector) function  :

ξ g g  χ  ξ g  ; ξ g  ξ g  χ 0 ; ξ g   g  e

 d ξ g  J ξ g  d ξe where J  ξ g   det J  ξ g 
i

  i  ξ g ; ξ g 
J ξ g 
i

j   gj
ξg  0

d ξe  0
 g  ξ g   e  0  e
d ξg J ξ g  e(0) is arbitrary

Theorem 6.5: SO(2) d g  d 

Proof: R   R   R       ;     

    ;  
J    1 Setting e(0) = 1 completes proof.
   0
Theorem 6.6: Orthonormality & Completeness Relations for SO(2)
2
d †
 U n   U m     nm Orthonormality
0
2


n  
U n
  U n        

  Completeness

Proof: These are just the Fourier theorem since U n    ei n 

Comments:
• These relations are generalizations of the finite group results with
g   dg
• Cf. results for Td ( roles of continuous & discrete labels reversed )
6.5. Multi-Valued Representations

Consider representation R   U1/ 2    ei  / 2

U1/ 2  2     ei  / 2  U1/ 2  


U1/ 2  4     e  U1/ 2  
i  / 2 2-valued representation

m-valued representations :

R   Un / m    ei n / m ( if n,m has no common factor )

Comments:
• Multi-connected manifold  multi-valued IRs:
• For SO(2): group manifold = circle  Multi-connected because
paths of different winding numbers cannot be continuously deformed
into each other.
• Only single & double valued reps have physical correspondence in
3-D systems ( anyons can exist in 2-D systems ).
6.6. Continuous Translational Group in 1-D
R() ~ translation on unit circle by arc length 
 Similarity between reps of R(2) & Td

Let the translation by distance x be denoted by T(x)

Given a state | x0  localized at T  x  x0  x0  x is localized at x0+x


x0,
T  x T  x  x0  T  x x0  x  x0  x  x  T  x  x x0  x0

 T  x T  x   T  x  x 
T  0 x0  x0  0  x0  E x0  x0  T  0  E

T xT  x  T x  x  T  0  E  T  x  T x


1

 
T1  T  x  x  R  is a 1-parameter Abelian Lie group

= Continuous Translational Group in 1-D


Generator P: T  dx   E  i dx P
dT
T  x  dx   T  x   dx dT  x 
dx   i P T  x 
 T  x  T  dx   T  x   i dx P dx

 T  x   ei P x

For a unitary representation T(x)  Up(x), P is Hermitian with real


eigenvalue p. Basis of Up(x) is the eigenvector | p  of P:

P p  p p U p  x  p  p ei p x pR

Comments:
1. IRs of SO(2), Td & T1 are all exponentials: e–i m , e–i knb & e–i p x, resp.
Cause: same group multiplication rules.
2. Group parameters are
continuous & bounded for SO(2) = { R() }
discrete & unbounded for Td = { T(n) }
continuous & unbounded for T1 = { T(x) }
Invariant measure for T1: d g  C dx

dx †

 2 p
U  x  U p
 x     p  p  Orthonormality


dp p
 2 U  x  U p x    x  x 

  Completeness

C = (2)–1 is determined by comparison with the Fourier theorem.

SO(2) Td T1
Orthonormality mn (k–k) (p–p)
Completeness (–) nn (x–x)
6.7. Conjugate Basis Vectors
Reminder: 2 kind of basis vectors for Td.
• |x localized state T  n  x  x  nb
• |Ek extended normal mode T  n  E k  E k ei k n b

uE , k  x   x Ek H Ek E Ek

For SO(2):
• |   = localized state at ( r=const,  ) U   0    0
• | m  = eigenstate of J & R() U   m  m ei m 

  U   0    m m 
m  

 U   m 

m   m U   0 †
0  m 0 ei m 
Setting m 0 1 gives m   ei m  m
 transfer matrix elements  m |   = representation function e–i m 

  
m  
m ei m  m   ei m 

2 2 
d i m  
d i  mm   
 2
e    m  2
e 
m  
m  m m  m
0 m   0

2 ways to expand an arbitrary state |   :


 2
d
  
m  
m m 
 2
   
0

        m m    ei m m
m m

2 2
d d  i m 
m  m    m      e   
0
2 0
2
 
J    J m ei m    m m ei m   i    
m   m   
1  1 
J is Hermitian:  J   J        
i  i 
1 
 J in the x-representation
i 

 J = angular momentum component  plane of rotation


For T1:
• | x  = localized state at x T  x  x0  x  x0
• | p  = eigenstate of P & T(x) T  x  p  p ei p x

x  p T  x 0
T is unitary
p  ei p x p 0  ei p x
 
 p | 0  set to 1
dp dp
x  

2
p p x  

2
p ei p x

   
d p
p   p  p  p
i  p  p  x


d x ei p x x  

2
p 

dx e  

d p

 
dp d p i p  x  x 
x x   x p e  i p x   e    x  x 

2 
2
 

  d x ei  p p  x  2   p  p 

p p  dx e i px
p x 
 
2 ways to expand an arbitrary state |   :
 
   dx x x    dx x   x
 
 
dp
 

2
p p   
dp
2
p   p

 
dp
  x  x    p  d p i px
e   p

2
x p  

2
 
  p  p    x  d x e i p x   x 

dx p x  


dp 

i p x
P x  P p e  i x

2 x
1  1 
P+ =P: x P   Px   x     x
i x i x
1 
P on V = span{ | x  }  P = linear momentum
i x

You might also like