Scribd
Upload
221 views

Literature Review

The document provides guidance on writing an effective literature review. It discusses the purpose and characteristics of a literature review, including establishing the context of a topic, surveying previous research, and identifying gaps. It also offers tips for critical reading, analyzing sources, planning a structure, and drafting and revising the literature review.

Uploaded by

Megha Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
221 views

Literature Review

The document provides guidance on writing an effective literature review. It discusses the purpose and characteristics of a literature review, including establishing the context of a topic, surveying previous research, and identifying gaps. It also offers tips for critical reading, analyzing sources, planning a structure, and drafting and revising the literature review.

Uploaded by

Megha Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW

OBJECTIVES

 To know about the purpose of a literature review


 To think about what your own literature review will look like
 Critical thinking, reading and writing
 Planning and structuring options.
LITERATURE REVIEW

 A critical analysis of existing research in your field; it highlights both the strengths and weaknesses
of existing research

 Allows you to gain a critical understanding of your field

 Opportunity to think about what has been done in your field; opportunity to think about the
similarities, patterns, trends and also differences across the existing research

 By identifying strengths and weakness, you will be able to think about what has not/needs to be
done in your field

 The gap in the literature is your justification for your research


WHAT IS A LITERATURE REVIEW (FOR)?

 Establishes the terms and context. How else will you define exactly what you’re looking at and where its
limits are?
 Presents a survey of preceding literature on the topic. How else will you know what’s been done
already?
 Explores ways that others have solved similar questions/problems. How else will you select an
appropriate methodology and approach?
 Outlines the relationship of these texts to each other. How else will you know what the different
perspectives and debates are, and where you are coming from?
 Evaluates the quality and relevance of the literature. How else will you be able to build on or reject it?
 Establishes the gaps or inadequacies. How else will you justify your own contribution?
 Demonstrates your scholarly rigor. How else can I have faith in your conclusions?
MORE THAN JUST A CHAPTER…

 A literature review is a process as well as an outcome!

 Literature review as an outcome: appears in the final draft of your


thesis as part of your introduction or as a separate chapter.

 Literature review as a process: critical engagement (thinking, reading


and writing) with relevant research on your topic. It is a crucial and
formative stage of your thesis journey.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

 Please note that a Literature Review is NOT an annotated bibliography.


 An annotated bibliography is the following:
 1) The full References/Bibliography/Works Cited citation for a source;
 2) A brief summation of the major points of the work;
 3) A brief indication of how this research is helpful to your project;
 4) And at times, any indications of weaknesses that are in the source that could
compromise using it.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT.)

 So, in a nutshell, an Annotated Bibliography is a list of sources, their content, and how
you will use them in a paper.

 A literature review, on the other hand, is an ESSAY that covers the major findings of a
field, how they relate to or are dissimilar from other findings, and major
methodological and informational problems in the research.
CHARACTERISTICS OF
EFFECTIVE LITERATURE REVIEWS

 Outlining important research trends


 Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of existing research
 Identifying potential gaps in knowledge
 Establishing a need for current and/or future research projects
READING CRITICALLY
Think about:

 What were the research aims of the paper/book?


 Is the research aim achieved? If so, how did they do it?
 Are there any problems with their methodology?
 Was it a strong or a weak research model?
 How will this research help with your own research?
 What can you take from it?
 What needs to be avoided?
 What are you doing differently?
CRITICAL THINKING
(A THREE-YEAR-OLD’S GUIDE)

 Why?
 How does that work?
 What’s that made of?
 What’s that for?
 What does that mean?
 But X says…
 How do you know?
 So what?
 Says who?
 What happens if…
WHAT CRITICAL THINKING CAN MEAN IN TERMS OF THE
LITERATURE REVIEW

 Understanding research on its own terms – testing its viability

 Understanding research in relation to other arguments

 Critiquing research in relation to what you want to do


STARTING TO THINK ABOUT YOUR OWN LITERATURE REVIEW

 Who are the key players in my field? This could be anything from academics, medics,
governing bodies, schools of thought etc. (Sources!)

 What are the main ideas/debates in my field?

 How have these ideas changed over time?

 What are some of the problems with these ideas/debates? Is there a problem with the
methodology?

 What are you going to do differently?


KEY PLAYERS AND SOURCES

 First stage of the literature review is to identify the key people in your field and
collate all relevant sources about your topic.

Ask yourself:
 What research and theory is there on my topic?
 What are the key sources (books, articles) on my topic?
 Who are the main theorists and researchers in this area?
 How has the topic/problem been investigated over time?
WHERE TO START?!

YOU DON’T NEED TO READ


EVERYTHING – you can’t!

 You don’t need to read every text

 You don’t need to read every word


MAIN IDEAS/DEBATES

 Once you have the relevant sources you can begin to think about what the key ideas,
debates, methodologies etc. are in your field.
 You can also think about how these ideas have changed over time.

Ask yourself:
 How has the topic or problem been defined?
 Are there any trends and patterns across the literature?
 What methodological assumptions and approaches have been used?
 What are the agreements and disagreements between theorists on my topic?
THINKING ABOUT YOUR LITERATURE REVIEW

 What is your topic?


 Who are the key people in your field? What are the key resources?
 What are the key ideas in your field? What methodologies have been used?
 What are some of the strengths and weaknesses of existing research?
 What will your contribution be? How will it be different?

(NB: If you can’t answer some of these question, make a note of this. It will come in
handy later!)
STEPS FOR WRITING A LIT REVIEW

 Planning
 Reading and Research
 Analyzing
 Drafting
 Revising
PLANNING THE REVIEW

 Planning is about organising the structure of your literature review


 How to organise the information?
 Chronologically?
 Thematically?
 By trends/approaches/techniques?
 Major debates/controversies?
 Probably a combination of these
WRITING THE REVIEW

 Start with an overview


 Decide on organising principles (themes, trends, methodology, chronology,
controversies – usually a combination of some of these)
 Use headings for the different sections of the review
 Provide summative signposts of where your argument is leading
 Summarise your review/highlight ‘gap’ in research
READING AND RESEARCHING
 Collect and read material.
 Summarize sources.
 Who is the author?
 What is the author's main purpose?
 What is the author’s theoretical perspective? Research methodology?
 Who is the intended audience?
 What is the principal point, conclusion, thesis, contention, or question?
 How is the author’s position supported?
 How does this study relate to other studies of the problem or topic?
 What does this study add to your project?
 Select only relevant books and articles.
ANALYZING SOURCES

 A literature review is never just a list of studies—it always offers an


argument about a body of research

 Analysis occurs on two levels:


 Individual sources
 Body of research
SUMMARY AND SYNTHESIS

In your own words, summarize and/or synthesize the key findings relevant to your study.

 What do we know about the immediate area?

 What are the key arguments, key characteristics, key concepts or key figures?

 What are the existing debates/theories?

 What common methodologies are used?


FOUR ANALYSIS TASKS OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW

TASKS OF
LITERATURE
REVIEW

SYNTHESIZE CRITIQUE COMPARE


SUMMARIZE
SOME GENERAL GUIDELINES

 Start with the MOST RECENT and WORK BACKWARDS to the oldest. Many books
suggest using a five-year span from the present for sufficient coverage.

 Read through abstracts to identify if an article would be good

 Look for MAJOR figures in the field and MAJOR studies/articles.


USE OF CITATIONS IN THE LITERATURE REVIEW

Two types of citations:

 Integral: The author’s name appears in the sentence.

 Non-integral: The author’s name appears outside sentence.

You might also like