Quantitative Research
Quantitative Research
Qualitative Research...
• Is any research conducted using an observational
technique or unstructured questioning.
• Often viewed as a “Soft-approach.” Conducted:
– when structured research is not possible,
– when true response may not be available [embarrassing
“touchy questions”]
– to explain quantitative research results.
• Should not be viewed as conclusive research.
• Qualitative and quantitative research are
complementary to each other.
2
A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Research
3
Classification of Qualitative Research Procedures
Q u a li t a t i v e R e s e a r c h
P ro c e d u re s
D ir e c t In d ir e c t
( N o n d is g u is e d ) ( D is g u is e d )
F o c u s G ro u p s D e p th In te r v ie w s P r o je c t i v e
T e c h n iq u e s
A s s o c ia tio n C o m p le t i o n C o n s tr u c tio n E x p r e s s iv e
T e c h n iq u e s T e c h n iq u e s T e c h n iq u e s T e c h n iq u e s
4
Qualitative research = Observation technique
Classification of Observation
• Direct vs indirect: • Structured vs unstructured
– Direct>> observing – Structured>>predetermine
behavior as it occurs what to observe
– Indirect >> observing the – Unstructured>>monitor all
effects of behavior behavior
• Disguised vs nondisguised • Human vs Mechanical
– Nondisguised>>Direct – Human>>observation done
– Disguised >> Indirect by human beings
– Mechanical>>observation
by machine
5
Observation I
• Appropriate Conditions
– The event must occur in a short time interval,
• avoid lag affect
– Must occur in a setting where the researcher can
observe the behavior
• Praying, cooking are not suitable things to observe
– Necessary under situations of faulty recall
• Faulty recall>>remembering things such as how many times
one looked at his wristwatch.
6
Observation:
Advantages and Limitations
• Advantages
– Greater data accuracy than direct questioning, in natural
settings people behave naturally,
– Problems of refusal, not at home, false response, non-
cooperation etc. are absent,
– No recall error,
– In some situations, only way
• Number of customers visiting a store
• Studying children’s behavior
• Limitations
– Time consuming, -- too many things to observe,
– may not be representative,
– difficulty in determining root cause of the behavior.
7
Focus Group I
• An interview conducted by a trained moderator
in a non-structured and natural manner with a
small group of respondents.
• Objectives:
– Generate new product or service ideas
– Understand consumer vocabulary
• Useful for ad campaigns
– Reveal consumer needs, motives, perceptions and
attitudes,
• Generating future research objectives
– Facilitate understanding of the quantitative studies
9
Focus Group Procedure
Determine the objectives of the Marketing Research Project
and define the problem
Specify the objective of qualitative research
State the objectives/questions to be answered by the focus
group
Write a screening questionnaire
Develop a moderator’s outline
Conduct the focus group interview
Review tapes and analyze data
Summarize the findings and plan follow-up research
10
The Focus Group Moderator
11
Traits of a Good Focus Group Moderator
• Major Advantages:
– Synergism, Snowballing, Stimulation,
Security, Spontaneity, Speed and Cost savings.
• Major Disadvantages:
– Lack of representativeness, Misuse, Misjudge,
Moderation problem, and Difficulty of
analysis
• A very promising technique.
13
Seven advantages of Focus Group I
15
Five Disadvantages of Focus Group
1. Lack of representativeness. Focus groups are not representative of the
general population. Hence, results of focus group discussions are not
projectable and should not be the only basis for decision making.
2. Misjudgement. Focus groups are generally susceptible to client and
researcher biases. As such, compared to the results of other data
collection techniques, focus group results could be easily misjudged.
3. Misuse. Focus groups can be misused and abused by considering the
results as conclusive rather than exploratory.
4. Moderation. Skills of the moderator is a major determinant of focus
group success and the quality of their results. But moderators with
desirable skills are rare.
5. Difficult to analyze. The unstructured nature of the responses in focus
group discussions makes coding, analysis, and interpretation difficult.
16
Other Qualitative Techniques
18
FREE WORD ASSOCIATION
In this technique, a list of carefully selected stimulus words or
phrases related to the topic of research are read out, one at a time,
to a respondent. The respondent is asked to respond with the first
word or phrase that comes to his/her mind. The list of words
should contain a mixture of test words and neutral words.
19
SENTENCE COMPLETION
This technique is an extension of the free-word association
test. In this technique, the respondent is presented with some
sentences containing incomplete stimuli and is asked to
complete them. Like the free-word association method,
interpreting and analysing data obtained from this technique
is also difficult.
Since Mr. Albert Lee had received a large commission by check just
before leaving home for a holiday trip, he wanted to deposit it in an
automatic teller machine, because ___________, but his friend Mr.
Wong told him that he should _____________, because
_____________.
21
CARTOON COMPLETION TEST
In the cartoon technique, the
respondent is shown a comic- Deposit
strip like cartoon with two this
cheque
characters in a conversation. nearest
ATM in
While the speech of one the
23