APL 113
God as the
Ultimate Value:
Theism
DR. ALLAN C. ORATE
DR. ALLAN C. ORATE, UE
GOD
=
VALUE
THEISM God exists.
ATHEISM God does not exist.
MONOTHEISM There is only one God.
POLYTHEISM There are many gods.
PANTHEISM Everything is God.
AGNOSTICISM God cannot be known by
the human mind.
FIDEISM God cannot be known
rationally but only by faith.
DEISM God created the world then
abandoned it completely.
θθθθ POLYTHEISM
Greek and Roman
θθθθ Mythology/Religion
Hinduism
MONOTHEISM
Judaism
Christianity
(Unitarian or Trinitarian)
Islam
PANTHEISM
Baruch Spinoza
θ=
Augustine
AGNOSTICISM
GOD
Infinite
HUMAN
MIND
Finite
ANSELM
Credo ut intelligam.
“I believe so that I may understand.”
FIDEISM
Faith
God
Reason
THEISM
TYPES OF PROOFS
FOR GOD’S EXISTENCE
Ontological
Cosmological
Teleological
Moral
Mystical
ONTOLOGICAL PROOFS
FOR GOD’S EXISTENCE
Anselm of
Canterbury
Rene
Descartes
ANSELM of Canterbury
1033-1103 AD
Doctor Mirabilis
Father of Scholasticism
Monologion
Proslogion θ
“The fool said in his heart:
there is no God above.”
Φ
ANSELM
Ontological Proof
God is the greatest thought
the human mind can conceive.
A being that exists in reality
is greater than a being that
exists only in the mind.
Therefore,
God exists in reality.
RENE
DESCARTES
1596-1650
Father of Modern Philosophy
Rationalism and Innatism
Meditations on First Philosophy
Discourse on Method
DESCARTES
Rationalist Method of Knowing
World
Things
ASCERTAINING
Sense Data
DOUBTING
Other Selves
Things God
Self
World
Mind
Thought
INDUBITABLE
“I think, therefore I exist.”
DESCARTES
Ontological Proof
I have in my mind a clear
and distinct idea of God
as a perfect being.
Therefore,
God exists in reality
(because if God does not exist
in reality, then God is
not perfect).
STRUCTURE OF THE
ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
MIND WORLD
Logical Ontological
God as God as
“ideal being” “real being”
EXISTENTIAL FALLACY
Illicit transition from idea into reality
COSMOLOGICAL
ARGUMENTS FOR
GOD’S EXISTENCE
BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE
COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
OUTSIDE
WORLD
THE WORLD
Things as God as
“real beings” “real being”
Immanent Trancendent
FIVE WAYS
(QUINQUE VIAE)
for Demonstrating
God’s Existence by
Thomas Aquinas
Summa Theologica
Part 1
Question 2
Article 3
LOGICAL STRUCTURE
OF THE FIVE WAYS
STEP 1 Observation Method of
by the Senses Knowing
STEP 2 Facts in the Reality of
World Things
STEP 3 Consideration Ultimate
of First Cause Reality
STEP 4 Logical Therefore,
Conclusion God exists.
FIRST WAY
Argument from Motion
STEP 1 Observation “Things move and they
by Senses are moved by another.”
STEP 2 Facts in the “There are movements
World and movers of things.”
STEP 3 Consideration “There must be the
of First Cause unmoved mover.”
STEP 4 Logical
Conclusion “Therefore, God exists.”
SECOND WAY
Argument from Cause
STEP 1 Observation “Things exist as they
by Senses are caused by another”
STEP 2 Facts in the “There are causes of
World things.”
STEP 3 Consideration “There must be the
of First Cause uncaused cause.”
STEP 4 Logical
“Therefore, God exists.”
Conclusion
THIRD WAY
Argument from Contingency
STEP 1 Observation “It is possible for
by Senses things not to be.”
STEP 2 Facts in the “Things in the world
World are contingent.”
STEP 3 Consideration “There is a
of First Cause necessary being.”
STEP 4 Logical
Conclusion “Therefore, God exists.”
FOURTH WAY
Argument from Gradation of Being
STEP 1 Observation “There are things better
by the Senses than others.”
STEP 2 Facts in the “There is hierarchy of
World beings in the world.”
STEP 3 Consideration “There must be an
of First Cause absolute perfect being.”
STEP 4 Logical
Conclusion “Therefore, God exists.”
FIFTH WAY
Argument from Design
STEP 1 Observation “Things move in orderly
by the Senses and purposive way.”
STEP 2 Facts in the “There is an intelligent
World design in the world.”
STEP 3 Consideration “There must be supreme
of First Cause director of all things.”
STEP 4 Logical
Conclusion “Therefore, God exists.”
θ
SUMMARY OF THE FIVE WAYS
Fact First Conclu
Principle sion
First Motion Unmoved God
Way Mover
Second Cause Uncaused God
Way Cause
Third Contingent Necessary God
Way Being Being
Fourth Gradation Absolutely God
Way of Being Perfect Being
Fifth Design in Intelligent God
Way the Universe Supreme Being
MORAL PROOF FOR
GOD’S EXISTENCE
Based on
Immanuel Kant’s
Moral Postulates
IMMANUEL KANT
1724 -1804
Integration of
Rationalism and Empiricism
Critique of Pure Reason
Critique of Practical Reason
Critique of Judgment
KANT
Moral Postulates
Freewill
Existence of God
Immortality of the Soul
KANT
God’s Existence as Moral Postulate
Morality is possible if
good people are rewarded and
evil doers are punished (Justice).
Since complete justice
is not rendered in this world,
there must be a being who delivers
eternal justice in the afterlife.
Therefore by practical reason,
it is assumed that God exists as
the supreme giver of justice.
TELEOLOGICAL PROOF
Pragmatic
Justification for
God’s Existence
MEANS END
Belief Practical
in God Result
PRAGMATIC
JUSTIFICATION FOR
GOD’S EXISTENCE
William James
Blaise Pascal
WILLIAM JAMES
1842-1910
PRAGMATISM
Varieties of Religious Experience
“The Will to Believe”
PRAGMATISM
Gk. Praxis = Practice
PRAGMATIC THEORY OF TRUTH
“Truth happens to an idea.”
Practice Experience Theory
PRAGMATIC
THEORY OF VALUE
VALUE
Anything relevant
to human life
Practical solution
to a problem
Act that works in producing
practical result
JAMES
The Will to Believe
Meaningful
Belief in
Life/ Solution
God
Put into to Problem
Means Practice Result
θ Justification
of Suffering
World Peace
National Unity
Belief in God
Personal
Contentment
Having a Job
BLAISE PASCAL
1623-1662 The Pensees
Pascal’s Gamble
OBJECTIVE
PASCAL’S
GAMBLE God God does
exists. not exist.
All Gain: No Loss:
1
SUBJECTIVE
I believe. Eternal
Salvation
2
“So what?”
I don’t All Loss: No Gain:
believe. 3
Eternal 4
“What a
Damnation waste!”
DEISM
θ God created the world,
then abandoned it completely.
God is totally trancendent
and self sufficient.
DEISM
θ EPICURUS
Hedonism
LUCRETIUS
De Rerum Natura
God does not
meddle with the
world and with
human affairs.
DEIST INTERPRETATION IN
AMERICAN CONSTITUTION
“The Congress shall
make no law respecting any
religion and prohibiting the
free exercise thereof.”
STATE CHURCH
Politics Religion
Citizens God
AMERICAN EMPIRIALISM BASED
θ
ON DEIST IDEOLOGY
Economy
Politics
Military