Merchandise Planning
Merchandise Planning
The store type can be product group specific, for example a it
could be a Type A Menswear store but a Type B Ladieswear
store depending on the local trading conditions. It is generally
not practical to have more than three store types.
Performance Data
Evidence supporting a prediction improves confidence
and reduces risk
Conversely if the market suggests one thing but
performance data proves another you know to proceed
with caution
Performance Data Gives you THE FACTS !
Performance Data is inconvertible evidence of your
customers preferences
Performance Data
Performance Data is the root of Profitable Decision
Making
Intake Margin
The Margin achieved if the Product is sold at its original
Label Price
Intake Margin % = ( Label Price Exc Tax – Delivered Cost
Prx) / Label Price
Intake Margin % = Intake Margin Value / Buy Value
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Intake Margin is a KRA of a Buyer
Intake Margin achievement is critical to your ability to
achieve planned Margin on Sales – Under Achievement
against plan will put pressure on your markdowns
Look for Opportunitites to Increase intake margin % by
reducing the cost Price or Increasing the label Price
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Stock Cost of Markdown
The Cost of a Stock revaluation resulting from the price
changes
Stock Cost of MD Value = ( Current Price – New Price ) *
Units in Stock
Stock Cost of MD % = Cost of MD Value / Sales Value
There are two reasons why cost of MD will be higher than
planned
Planned Full Price sales were not achieved
The Average Price reduction was higher than Planned
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
A high cost of MD is not necessarily bad – Compare actual
to plan and check the margin on sales achievement
A Markdown that is significantly below the plan is not
necessarily good :
If Full Price Sell Thru is also high, Sales Potential may have
been missed
If terminal stocks are high there may be an future MD
problem
Markdown % can only be reduced by improving Full Price
sell Through % or decreasing the avg Price reduction %
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Average Rate of Sale
Average rate Unit sales per Option per outlet per week for
all outlets Stocking the Option
Rate Of Sale ( ROS ) = Sales Units / Outlets in Stock /
Weeks on sale
Rate of sale is a key indicator , together with the number of
weeks cover of the demand for a product – Higher the ROS
in relation to its NWC the higher the demand
Rate of Sale is a better measure of relative performance
than the absolute sales since it accounts for differences in
distribution
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Rate of Sale is a good measure for asessing the potential of
limited distribution trials
Rate of Sale comparisons by options within products are
useful to assess if there are colour rather than Product
Problems
Where rate of sale is high for a Product across all options you
should look at the increasing the number of options
( colours ) in the same product and at trailing similar non –
competitive lines
You would generally try to replace products that have a low
rate of sale
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
FULL PRICE SELL THROUGH %
The amount of total buy in units that you have sold at a full
price
Full Price Sell Through % = Full Price Sales Units / Total Buy
Units
Planned Full Price Sell Through will tend to be lower for
higher risk products with shorter product life cycles
If the actual sell through is high compared to the plan you may
have missed potential – Overall sales would have been higher
if you had bought more due to increased markdown sales
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Number of Weeks Cover ( NWC)
The Number of weeks current sales represented by the
current stock holding
NWC = Closing Stock / Sales
Lower the number of weeks cover the harder the stock is
working and the higher the relative demand for the product or
category
If NWC is too low there may be missed potential caused by
stock outs
If NWC is too high there may be an increased markdown risk
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Optimum NWC is determined by comparing relative
performance ; Eg – Option A is performing 10 weeks cvr
If the average is 6 weeks, the option performance is
unacceptable
If the average is 15 weeks, the option performance is doing well
BUT if there are several options on 4 weeks cover then may be
the average is too high….
The average number of weeks cover is the number of weeks of
average sales represented by the average stock holding over a
period
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Forward Cover
Number of weeks of future sales represented by the current
stock holding
Used in conjunction with the NWC to assess risk –
Stock Turn
The number of times throughout the year which your stock is
completely replaced
Stock Turn = 52 / Average Weeks Cover
Stock Turn = ( Annual Sales / Sum of Closing Stock) * 52
Low NWC = High Stock Turn & Vice Versa
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Stock Turn is a measure of asset management – Higher
the Stock turn the harder you are working on your asset
Stock turn will be higher for higher demand and
frequently purchased products
Objective is to increase the stock turn buy decreasing the
average NWC without affecting the availability
Outlet Trading Surplus
Margin Delivered by each outlet after the costs
Outlet Trading Surplus = Margin on Sales – Outlet Costs
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Availability
Measures whether an option or a SKU is available during its
primary selling phase
Availability % = ( Avg Actual Stock / Avg Model Stock)%
Other Indicators – Sudden increase in NWC, Slow moving
SKU Stocks at the DC , size imbalances
Poor availability generally equates to poor performance or
missed potential
Availability can be improved by better intake planning ,
better size planning and through Size Balancing
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Sales ( Margins ) per sq ft per week
The Sales or margin realised per square foot of selling
space per week
Measurable at category level or above
Sales ( Margin ) per sq ft = Sales ( Margin ) / sq ft /
Weeks
Sales and Margin per sq ft is a key indicator of your outlet
productivity and of the productivity of individual category
within a outlet
Analysing Performance –
Key Measures
Like to Like ( LTL) performance
Like to like performance is a key indicator of Retail Health
LTL growth represents real growth as opposed to that
delivered by new or refurbished outlets
Like to Like outlet is one which has been open in its present
format for at least one trading year
Like to like outlets tend to be the lowest cost to the business
since all set up cost have been incurred – and therefore tend
to be the most profitable
LTL growth expectation is your starting point
Analysing Performance –
Check List
Range Performance
Attribute Performance
Range Mix
Flow & Volume Lines
Promotions
Outlet Performance
Option Performance – Pricing, Product Life Cycle, Size
performance, Buy Quantity,
Timing, Distribution
Analysing Performance
Area Concern Indicators Action Point
Range Were there any All Options in a range Try to establish the
Performance range failures? performed badly reasons for failure –
pricing, timing,fit, colour,
etc
Attribute Are there any Attributes which Check Option
Performance attribute failures? perform consistently performance for
below average contributing factors.
Cancel Commitments
where possible amend
attribute mix in Future
ranges
Are there any Atributes with a NWC Check Option
under potentialised or ROS significantly performance for
attributes? higher than the avg contributing factors. Re
Buy and balance range
where Possible. Amend
attribute mix for future
ranges
Analysing Performance
Area Concern Indicators Action Point
Range Mix Was performance Significant Ensure the learnings are
distorted by poor variations between included in future range
mix of products? attribute sales and plans. Re Buy or cancel to
stock participation balance the range inseason
by week wherever possible
Flow Lines Is the line going to The Sales trend for Identify & Trial possible
need replacing ? the line declining replacements
from its norm
Volume Have the Key Good rate of sale & Evolve or repeat existing
Lines Volume lines for Steady NWC for all lines as appropriate
the coming season options
identified?
Are the current Selecting new Trial Additional Options of
volume lines still volume lines is very potential new lines
relevant ? much a matter of
judgement
Sub Category Plan
It is summary of your overall expectations from the coming
season
It is used to enter the total sales, Markdown & Margin
Protections which will then be phased by week on the WSSI
OTB can be taken from the Subcat plan but is always better
that it is taken from WSSI
Process
Where reqd enter last years sales data
Deteremine LTL performance based on previous season
data/ trends
Component Calculation Example Shrink Shrin
Shrink Incl excl k Incl
Taxes Deduction Tax Rate 10% 10%
Sales Value As Planned 2,000 2,000
Plan Tax on sls Plan Sls Val * Sls tax% 2,000 * 10% 200 200
Plan Sls exc tax Plan sls val – plan tax on sls 2,000 – 200 1,800 1,800
Plan sls val v LY % (plan sls val/ LY sls Val) – 1
Cost of MD% As Planned 13.6% 13.6%
Plan cost of MD val Sales Val * Cost of MD % 2,000 * 13.8% 272 276
Shrink % Buy Val As Planned 0.0% 1.2%
Plan Buy val (Plan Sls Val+Plan cost of MD val)/ (2,000+276)/(1- 2,272 2,304
( 1- shrink %Buy val) 1.2%)
Plan Shrinkage Val Plan Buy Val–Plan Sls Val-plan MD 2304 -2000-276 0 28
Plan Tax onBuy Plan Buy Val * Sales Tax % 2,304 *10% 227 230
Val
Plan buy Ex Plan Buy-Plan Tax on Buy Val 2,304 – 230 2,045 2,073
TaxVal
Sub Category Plan-
Calculations
Component Calculation Example Shrink Shrink
Excl incl
Plan Intake Plan Buy Val * Plan Intake 2,304*50% 1,136 1,152
Margin Val Margin %
Plan Buy at Cost Plan Buy ex Tax Val-Plan 2,073–1,152 906 927
Val Intake margin val
Plan Margin on Plan Margin on Sales Value / 879 / 2,000 44.5% 43.9%
Sales % Plan Sales Value
Component Calculation Example Shrink Shrink
( Shrink incl) Excl Incl
Avg Label Price As Planned 26 25
Plan Buy Units (Plan Buy Val*1000)/Plan Av 2,304*1000/25 90,880 92,146
Label Price
Avg Price Redn As Planned 40% 40%
%
Shrinkage %Buy Shrink%of Buy Val/(1-Avg prx 1.2%/( 1-40%) 0% 2%
Units redn %)
Plan Shrinkage Plan Buy Units * Shrinkage % 92,146 * 2.0% 0 1,483
Units of Buy Units
Plan Total Sales Plan Buy Units – Plan 92,146 – 1,483 90,880 90,303
Units Shrinkage Units
FP Sell Thru % As Planned 70.0% 70.0%
Plan FP Sales Plan Buy Units * Plan FP Sell 92,146 * 70% 63, 516 64,502
Units Thru %
Buy Options As Planned 100 100
Avg Total Sales Plan Total Sales Units/Plan Buy 92,148 / 100 909 921
Per Option Options
Avg FP Sales per Plan FP Sales Units / Plan Buy 64,502/ 100 636 645
Option Options
Category WSSI
WSSI is the main tool used for Planning and managing the
weekly performance and open to buy for a category
Weekly Sales Stock and Intake
Pre season used to ensure weekly stock and performance
plans are robust and that sufficient OTB when required
In season used to identify the actions needed to ensure that
the sales and margin plans are achieved
Ideally operates at sub category / stock identity level
Responsibility of merchandising with inputs from the buyer
Category WSSI
INPUTS
Historical Performance
Outlet Opening Schedule & Planned sales by week
Promotional Plans
Initial Sales and Margin Projections
Stock Guidelines
Output
Sales, Margin, Markdown, Stock and Intake projections
for the week
Should be reconciled with Option management