Stat
Stat
1
Background
Thermodynamic parameters of stable
molecules can be found. However,
those for radicals and transition
state species cannot be readily
found. Need a way to calculate these
properties readily and accurately.
2
The Boltzmann Factor
fE E
Physical Quantity exp
const x fT T
ni i ni i j / kT
i j exp
nj j nj
3
Average basis of the behaviour of matter
ni
i j / kT
exp
nj
E ...
a b c d i
i 5
Statistical weights
At any instant the distribution of particles
among energy states involve n0 with energy 0, n1
with energy 1, n2 with energy 2 and so on. We
call the instantaneous distribution the
configuration of the system.
At the next moment the distribution will be
different, giving a different configuration with
the same total energy.
These configurations identify the way in which
the system can share out its energy among the
available energy states.
6
Statistical weights
A given configuration can be reached in a
number of different ways. We call the number
of ways the statistical weight of that
configuration. It represents the probability
that this configuration can be reached, from
among all other configurations, by totally
random means.
For N particles arriving at a configuration in
which there are n0 particles with energy 0, n1
with etc, the statistical weight is:
N!
n0 !n1!n2 !n3! ... 7
Principle of equal a priori probabilities
Each configuration will be visited exactly
proportional to its statistical weight
N ni E ni i
i i
We must find the most probable configuration
How likely is this to dominate the assembly?
For an Avogadro number of particles with an average change of
configuration of only 1 part in 10 10 reduces the probability by:
ni i
e
N
where and are constants under the
conditions of constant temperature
9
ni i
e
N
The lowest state has energy 0 = 0 and
occupation number n0
n0
e
N
which identifies the constant , and enables us
to write:
ni i n0 i
e e e
N N
ni i
e
n0 10
ni i
e
n0
this is a temperature dependent ratio since
the occupation number of the states vary
with temperature
N n0 n0 e 1 n0 e 2 n0 e 3 ... n0 e i
all states
N
n0
e i
all states
Ne i
ni or writing q
e i
e i
all states
all states
Ne i
ni
q 13
Molecular partition function, q
Determines how particles distribute (or partition)
themselves over accessible quantum states.
1 2 3 1
q 1 e e e ... 0 0,
kT
g e
j
q j
all levels
16
The partition function explored
The total number of particles in our
assembly is N or, expressed intensively, NA
per mole
N A ni g j n j n0 q
all states all levels
NA
q
n0
If q/NA is large
there are many accessible states and molecules are
well spread over the energy states of the system
20
Canonical partition function
ln q
Em L
Molecular molar level V
states
ln QN
with energy: Em Ei
V 24
The Molar energy
ln QN
Em Ei
V
N q ln q
E N
q V V
25
The Molar energy
If we are able to calculate thermodynamic
properties for assemblies of N
independent particles using q and for N
non-independent particles using QN, then,
in the limit of the particles of QN,
becoming less and less strongly
interdependent, the two methods should
eventually converge.
26
The Molar energy
Note that the expressions:
ln q ln QN
N and
V V
Q exp ...
1
a
2
b
3
h
4
f
5
c
6
k
7
c
8
t
i
j
29
Distinguishable and indistinguishable
particles
If particles are indistinguishable the number of
accessible system states is lower than it is for
distinguishable ones. A system i
i 1a 2b 3h ...
differs from a state j
j 1a 2 h 3b ...
if particles are distinguishable, because of the
interchange of particles 2 and 3 between states b
and h. However, i is identical to j if particles are
indistinguishable
30
Distinguishable and indistinguishable
particles
In systems which are not at too high a density and
are also well above 0 K, the correction factor for
this over-counting of configurations is 1/N!
Q q N
( for distinguishable particles)
qN
Q ( for indistinguishable particles)
N!
31
Two-level systems
The simplest type of system is one which
comprises particles with only two
accessible states in the form of two non-
degenerate levels separated by a narrow
energy gap :
nu 0
nl 0
At temperatures that are comparable to /k only
the ground state and first excited state are
appreciably populated
32
Effect of increasing Temperature
The average population ratio of the two
levels is an assembly of such two-level (or
two-state) particles is given by:
nu 2 L / T
e e
nl
where the two-level temperature (2L) is defined as:
2L
k
33
Temperature Dependence of the populations
Comparing energy gap 2 L Comparing characteristic T
with background thermal (2L) with Temperature (T)
energy kT T
if T 5 2 L (high T )
nu
then e e 2 L / T e 1/ 5 0.82 (1)
nl
if T 0.5 2 L (low T )
nu
then e 1/ 0.5 0.14 ( 0)
nl
34
T dependence of populations
nl e nu
but total number of particles is constant nl nu N
1 e n
u N
1 e
nu
N
N
1 e e 1
e 1
nl
N
N
1 e e 1
35
T dependence of populations (Fig. 6.2)
1.0
nl
number of particles / N
0.5
nu
0 T T
0.0
0.1 1 10
Reduced temperature T/ 2L 36
Two-level Molecular partition function
The effect of q2 L e i
e 0
e ( 0 )
increasing T both
states
only two energy
states to consider e 0 (1 e )
if 0 0 q2 L (1 e )
High T Low T
T = 52L T = 0.52L
q2L = 1 + 0.82 q2L = 1 + 0.14
q2L 2 q2L 1
Both states equally only lower state
accessible accessible 37
The energy of a two-level system
E2 L ni ei nl x 0 nu x nu
i
1
N x
1 e
N
1 e
N 1 e
1
At high T, half the particles occupy the
upper state and the total energy takes the
value N 38
Two-level heat capacity, CV
The spacing of energy levels in discussing
two-level systems is not affected by
changes in volume, so the relevant heat
capacity is CV not CP
U U
CV
T V T
Variation of CV with T is a measure of how
accessible the upper states becomes as T
increases.
39
Two-level heat capacity, CV
Low T
kT is small
small T has little tendency to excite particles
overall energy remains constant => CV low
Intermediate T
kT is comparable to
small T has larger effect in exciting particles
CV is somewhat larger
High T
Almost half particles in excited state
small T causes very few particles excited to upper
Overall energy remains constant => CV low
40
Two-level heat capacity, CV
E2 L N 1 e
1
dE
dT
N 1 e
2
e 2
kT
2 e
CV Nk ( )
e 1
2
41
0.5 1.0
0.44Nk
0.4 0.8
E/Emax
0.2 0.4
0.1 0.2
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.42 1 10
Reduced temperature (T/ )
q2 L ( g 0 g1e )
43
The effect of degeneracy
Energy of the degenerate two-level system:
g1
N
g0
E
g1
e
g 0
and the heat capacity: g1
e
CV 2
g0
Nk 2
g1 e
g 0
44
Toolkit equations
1. Massieu bridge :
A A(0)
k ln Q
T
ln Q
2. Internal energy : U U (0) kT 2
T V
ln Q
3. Equation of state : p kT
V T
ln Q 2 2 ln Q
4. Heat capacity : CV 2kT kT
T V T
2
V
ln Q
5. Entropy : S k ln Q kT
T V
45
Toolkit equations
ln Q ln Q
6. Enthalpy : H H (0) kT 2
kTV
T V V T
ln Q
7. Gibbs free energy : G G (0) kT ln Q kTV
V T
47
Translational partition function, qtrs
qtrs , x e n x2 h 2 / 8 ml x2
all n
N N
3
3
N
q 1 2m 2 1 2mkT
2 V
2
Qtrs trs
V
N! N! h N! h2
53
Testing the continuum approximation
At its boiling temperature of 4.22 K, one mole of He
occupies 3.46 x 10-4 m3. How many translational
energy states are accessible at this very low
temperature, and determine whether the virtual
continuum approximation is valid.
3
2k
2 3
qtrs 2 ( MT ) 2 V
h NA
5 3 5 3
(5.942 x 1030 / mol m 3 kg K
2 2 2
) ( MT ) V
2
3
(5.942 x 1030 )(4.003 x 10 3 x 4.22) (3.46 x 10 4 )
2
4.5 x 10 24 (unitless) 54
Ideal monatomic gas: thermodynamic
functions
3 3
ln Qtrs N ln(2m) N ln T N ln V 3 N ln h ln N !
2 2
55
Ideal monatomic gas: thermodynamic
functions
ln Qtrs 3N
T V 2T
ln Qtrs
2
3N
2
T
2
V
2T
ln Qtrs N
V T V
56
The translational energy, Etrs
For a monatomic gas, the translational kinetic
energy, Etrs, is the only form of energy that the
monatomic particles possess, so we can equate
it directly to the internal energy, U, and
substitute the value of the derivative:
ln Qtrs 3
Etrs U kT 2
NkT
T V 2
(for one mole N = NA, NAk = R)
3
U m RT
2
57
The equation of state
This can be derived using:
ln Qtrs NkT
p kT
V T V
(for one mole N = NA, NAk = R)
RT
p or pVm RT
Vm
58
The heat capacity, CV
This can be derived using:
ln Qtrs ln Qtrs
2
CV 2kT kT 2
T T
2
V V
3 3
3 Nk Nk Nk
2 2
(for one mole N = NA, NAk = R)
3
CV , m R
2
59
Entropy of an ideal monatomic gas
All of the simplifying factors that result from
taking partial derivatives of ln Qtrs no longer hold
ln Qtrs
S k ln Qtrs kT
T V
3 3
ln Qtrs N ln(2m) N ln T N ln V 3 N ln h ln N !
2 2
lnQtrs is a direct term and so all variables appear
1 N
k ln Qtrs k ln q
N!
1 N
k ln ln q k ( N ln q ln N !)
N! 60
Entropy of an ideal monatomic gas
Next, using Stirlings approximation (lnN! NlnN N)
q
k ln Qtrs k ( N ln q N ln N N ) Nk 1 ln
N
q 3 5 q
S Nk 1 ln Nk Nk ln
N 2 2 N
3
5 2mkT 2 V
S Nk ln
2 h 2
N
One mole: (N = NA, NAk = R, NAm = M and V = RT/p
3
5 2MkT 2 RT
S m R ln
2
NA p
2 h NA
61
Entropy of an ideal monatomic gas
gathering together all experimental variables (M. T, p)
3 5
3
M T
2 2 2 2 5
S m R ln R ln (ek )
2
2
p N Ah
3
3
1 2 1
S m / R ln M / kg mol (T / K ) ( p / Pa) 20.723
2
Some calculated and measured entropies
Argon Krypton
Tb / K 87.4 120.2
Scalc / R 15.542 17.451
Scalor / R 15.60 17.43
63
Using the Sackur-Tetrode equation
The Sachur-Tetrode equation can also be written
as using ln p-1 = ln V ln R ln T
3 3
S m R ln V R ln T R ln M 18.605 R
2 2
where the variables are expressed in SI units (V/m 3, T/K, and M/kg
mol-1)
64
Significance of Sackur-Tetrode equation
3 3
S m R ln V R ln T R ln M 18.605 R
2 2
volume temperature
dependence dependence
V2 3 T2
ST R ln SV R ln the first two terms are
V1 2 T1
known from classical
T2 thermodynamics
CV ln
T1
the last two terms (3/2 R lnM and 18.605 R) could not
have been foreseen from classical thermodynamics 65
Change in conditions
Effect of increase in T, V, or M on:
D() Q U p CV S
T nil nil
69
Internal modes: separability of energies
j
tot
j
trs
j
rot j
vib j
el
70
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
Admits there is some energy interchange
in order to establish and maintain thermal equilibrium
But allows us to assess each energy mode as if it
were the only form of energy present in the
molecule
Molecular partition function can be formulated
separately for each energy mode (degree of
freedom)
Decide later how individual partition functions
should be combined together to form the overall
molecular partition function
71
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
Imagine an assembly of N particles that can store
energy in just two weakly coupled modes and
Each mode has its own manifold of energy states
and associated quantum numbers
A given particle can have:
- -mode energy associated with quantum number k
- -mode energy associated with quantum number r
tot k r
72
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
The overall partition function, qtot:
e
( i r )
qtot
all states
expanding we would get:
qtot e ( 0 0 ) e ( 0 1 ) e ( 0 2 ) e ( 0 3 )
( 1 0 ) ( 1 1 ) ( 1 2 ) ( 1 3 )
e e e e
( 2 0 ) ( 2 1 ) ( 2 2 ) ( 2 3 )
e e e e
e ( 3 0 ) e ( 3 1 ) e ( 3 2 ) e ( 3 3 )
... 73
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
but e(a+b) = ea.eb, therefore:
0 0 0 1 0 2
qtot e .e e .e e .e ...
1 0 1 1 1 2
e .e e .e e .e ...
2 0 2 1 2 2
e .e e .e e .e ...
...
each term in every row has a common factor of
in the first row, in the
second,
1 and so on. Extracting
e 0
these factors row by row: e
74
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
0 0 1 2 3
qtot e (e e e e ...)
1 0 1 2 3
e (e e e e ...)
2 0 1 2 3
e (e e e e ...)
e 3 (e 0 e 1 e 2 e 3 ...)
...
the terms in parentheses in each row are
identical and form the summation:
j
e
all states 75
Weak coupling: factorising the energy modes
qtot e 0
e 1
e 2
e 3
e
...
j
all states
j j
e x e
all states all states
qtot q x q
76
Factorising translational energy modes
Total translational energy of molecule j:
j
trs , tot j
trs , x j
trs , y j
trs , z
which allows us to write:
e e
trs , tot ( trs , x trs , y trs , z )
qtrs
all states all states
e e e
trs , x trs , y trs , z
qtrs x x
all x states all y states all z states
Qtot
qtrs
N
qrot qvib qel
N N N
N!
and thus: 1
Qtot qtrs .qrot .qvib .qel
N
N!
This conclusion assumes weak coupling. If
particles enjoy strong coupling (e.g. in liquids
and solutions) the argument becomes very
complicated!
81
Ideal diatomic gas: Rotational
partition function
Assume rigid rotor for which we can write
successive rotational energy levels, J, in terms
of the rotational quantum number, J.
h2
E J 2 J ( J 1) joules
8 I
EJ h
J 2 J ( J 1) cm 1
hc 8 Ic
BJ ( J 1) cm 1
where I is the moment of inertia of the
molecule, is the reduced mass, and B the
rotational constant. 82
Ideal diatomic gas: Rotational
partition function
Another expression results from using the
characteristic rotational temperature, r,
h2 hcB
r 2 k r hcB
8 Ik k
E J J ( J 1)k r ( joules )
qrot g J e J / kT
(2 J 1)e J ( J 1) r / T
T 8 2 IkT
qrot
r h2
This equation works well for heteronuclear
diatomic molecules.
For homonuclear diatomics this equation
overcounts the rotational states by a factor of
two.
85
Ideal diatomic gas: Rotational partition
function
When a symmetrical linear molecule rotates through
180o it produces a configuration which is
indistinguishable from the one from which it started.
all homonuclear diatomics
symmetrical linear molecules (e.g. CO2, C2H2)
Include all molecules using a symmetry factor
T
qrot
r
= 2 for homonuclear diatomics, = 1 for heteronuclear diatomics
= 2 for H2O, = 3 for NH3, = 12 for CH4 and C6H6 86
Rotational properties of molecules at 300 K
r/K T/r qrot
H2 88 2 3.4 1.7
CH4 15 12 20 1.7
HCl 9.4 1 32 32
HI 7.5 1 40 40
N2 2.9 2 100 50
CO 2.8 1 110 110
CO2 0.56 2 540 270
I2 0.054 2 5600 2800
87
Rotational canonical partition function
Qrot q N
rot
N N N
T T 8 IkT
2
Qrot
r h
2
hcB
88
Rotational Energy
8 2 Ik
ln Qrot N ln T N ln 2
h
this can differentiated wrt temperature, since the
second term is a constant with no T dependence
ln Qrot 2
U rot kT 2
NkT ln T
T V T
U rot NkT (for diatomic molecules)
89
Rotational heat capacity
U rot NkT (for diatomic molecules)
U rot , m RT
Crot ,m R (linear molecules)
90
Rotational entropy
ln Q U rot
S rot kT k ln Q k ln Q
T V T
N
NkT 8 IkT 2
k ln
h
2
T
IT 8 2 k
S rot Nk 1 ln ln 2
h
Srot is dependent on (reduced) mass (I = r2), and there
is also a constant in the final term, leading to:
S rot / R ln I / kg m T / K
2
1
106.53
91
Rotational entropy
Typically, qrot at room T is of the order of hundreds
for diatomics such as CO and Cl2. Compare this with
the almost immeasurably larger value that the
translational partition function reaches.
qrot 10 2
but qtrs 10 28
92
Extension to polyatomic molecules
In the most general case, that of a non-linear
polyatomic molecule, there are three independent
moments of inertia.
Qrot must take account of these three moments
Achieved by recognising three independent characteristic
rotational temperatures r, x, r, y, r, z corresponding to the
three principal moments of inertia Ix, Iy, Iz
With resulting partition function:
1
T T T 2
qrot
r, y
r, z
r , x
93
Conclusions
Rotational energy levels, although more widely
spaced than translational energy levels, are still
close enough at most temperatures to allow us to
use the continuum approximation and to replace
the summation of qrot with an integration.
95
The diatomic SHO model
We start by modelling a diatomic molecule on a
simple ball and spring basis with two atoms, mass
m1 and m2, joined by a spring which has a force
constant k.
The classical vibrational frequency, oscis given
by:
1 k
osc Hz
2
There is a quantum restriction on the available energies:
1
vib v hosc ( v 0, 1, 2, ...)
2 96
The diatomic SHO model
1
The value hosc is know as the zero point energy
2
97
Vibrational partition function, qvib
98
Vibrational partition function, qvib
The assumption (0 = 0) allows us to write:
1 h , 2 2h , 3 3h , 4 4h , ...
Under this assumption, qvib may be written as:
qvib e vib
1 e h
e 2 h
e 3 h
...
a simple geometric series which yields q vib in closed
form:
1 1
qvib h
vib / T
1 e 1 e
where vib = h/k = characteristic vibrational
temperature 99
Vibrational partition function, qvib
Unlike the situation for rotation, vib, can be
identified with an actual separation between
quantised energy levels.
101
Vibrational partition function, qvib
Light diatomic molecules have:
102
Vibrational partition function, qvib
Thus:
appreciable vibrational excitation resulting in:
population of the first (and to a slight extent higher)
excited vibrational energy state
qvib > 1
103
Vibrational partition function, qvib
Situation in polyatomic (qvib)
species is similar Species vib/K (@ 300 K)
complicated only by the CO2 3360 1.091
existence of 3N-5 or 3N-6 1890
normal modes of vibration. 954(2)
NH3 4880(2) 1.001
1
At high temperature the equation qvib
1 e vib / T
gives a linear dependence of qvib with temperature.
vib / T
If we expand 1 e , we get:
1 T
qvib High T limit
1 1 ( vib / T ) ... vib
106
T dependence of vibrational partition
function
As T increases, the
2.0 linear dependence of
qvib upon T becomes
1.8 increasingly obvious
1.6
qvib
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Reduced Temperature T/ 107
The canonical partition function, Q vib
N
1
Qvib q N
vib vib / T
1 e
Using U kT 2 ln Q we can find the first
T V
differential of lnQ with respect to temperature
to give:
ln Q Nk vib
U vib kT 2
vib / T
T V e 1
108
The vibrational energy, Uvib
R vib
U vib , m vib / T
(e 1)
3
U trs , m kT
2
U rot , m RT linear molecules
109
The vibrational energy, Uvib
R vib
U vib , m vib / T
(e 1)
This does reduce to the simple form at
equipartition (at very high temperatures) to:
U vib , m RT (equipartition)
Normally, at
room T:
3000 R 1
U vib , m 10 R
(e 1) 7 110
The zero-point energy
So far we have chosen the zero-point energy
(1/2h) as the zero reference of our energy scale
Thus we must add 1/2h to each term in the
energy ladder
For each particle we must add this same amount
Thus, for N particles we must add U(0)vib, m = 1/2Nh
R vib
U vib , m vib / T U (0) vib , m
(e 1)
R vib 1
vib / T N A h
(e 1) 2 111
Vibrational heat capacity, Cvib
The vibrational heat capacity can be found using:
U vib , m
2 vib / T
vib e
Cvib , m R vib / T
T 1) 2
V T (e
The Einstein Equation
u e 2 u
vib
FE u u
(e 1) 2
T
The Einstein function
113
The Einstein heat capacity
1.0
FE
0.5
low T High T
0.0
0.1 1 10
Reduced temperature T/
114
The Einstein function
The Einstein function has applications beyond
normal modes of vibration in gas molecules.
It has an important place in the understanding
of lattice vibrations on the thermal behaviour
of solids
It is central to one of the earliest models for
the heat capacity of solids
115
The vibrational entropy, Svib
U vib U vib (0) Avib Avib (0)
S vib
T T
U vib U vib (0)
k ln Qvib
T
We know Qvib qvib
Nand N = N for one mole, thus:
A
vib / T
ln 1 e
S vib , m vib / T
vib / T
R (e 1) 116
Variation of vibrational entropy with
reduced temperature
3.0
2.5
2.0
Svib/R
1.5
1.0
0.5
0 T T
0.0
0.1 1 10
Reduced temperature T/
117
Electronic partition function
Characteristic electronic temperatures, el,
are of the order of several tens of thousands
of kelvins.
Excited electronic states remain unpopulated
unless the temperature reaches several
thousands of kelvins.
Only the first (ground state) term of the
electronic partition function need ever be
considered at temperatures in the range
from ambient to moderately high.
118
Electronic partition function
It is tempting to decide that qel will not be a
significant factor. Once we assign 0 = 0, we
might conclude that:
qel e
el , i / kT 0
e 0 (higher terms ) 1
i
To do so would be unwise!
One must consider degeneracy of the ground
electronic state.
119
Electronic partition function
The correct expression to use in place of the
previous expression is of course:
qel g i e
el , i / kT
g 0 e 0 0 (higher terms) g 0
i
121
Electronic partition function
spectroscopic atom ground state = J
(2S+1)
122
Electronic partition function
For diatomic molecules the term symbols are
made up in much the same way as for atoms.
Total orbital angular momentum about the
inter-nuclear axis.
Determines the term symbol used for the
molecule ( etc. corresponding to S, P, D,
etc. in atoms).
As with atoms, the term multiplicity (2S+1) is
added as a superscript to denote the
multiplicity of the molecular term.
123
Electronic partition function
In the case of molecules it is this term
multiplicity that represents the degeneracy of
the electronic state.
For diatomic molecules we have:
spectroscopic molecular ground state = (2S+1)
124
Electronic partition function
Term
Species Symbol gn el/K
Li 2
S1/2 g0 = 2
C 3
P0 g0 = 1
N 4
S3/2 g0 = 4
O 3
P2 g0 = 5
F 2
P3/2 g0 = 4
2
P1/2 g1 = 2 590
NO 2
1/2 g0 = 2
2
3/2 g1 = 2 178
O2 3
-g g0 = 3
1
g g1 = 1 11650 125
Electronic partition function
Where the energy gap between the ground and
the first excited electronic state is large the
electronic partition function simply takes the
value g0.
When the ground-state to first excited state
gap is not negligible compared with kT (el/T is
not very much less than unity) it is necessary
to consider the first excited state.
The electronic partition function becomes:
el / T
qel g 0 g1e
126
Electronic partition function
For F atom at 1000 K we have:
el / T
qel g 0 g1e 4 2e 590 /1000 5.109
el / T
qel g 0 g1e 2 2e 178 /1000 3.674
127