Analysis of Miss Call Issue V2 0
Analysis of Miss Call Issue V2 0
Problem Description
Customer complained that many Missingcall messages were received in building usually. The scenario was recurred by frontline,
eNodeB had sent CS paging message at 12:45 on 22th October, but UE did not receive CS paging as is shown below. Missing
paging message caused MT user received Missingcall message.
eNodeB UU trace
UE Probe trace
Problem Analysis
1.The Paging Cycle Mismatch Between UE
and eNodeB
Based on live logs, the PagingDRX MME send to
eNodeB by S1-AP PAGING is v32, as the figure 1.
Problem Analysis
2.Protocol Analysis of Paging Cycle
Based on 3GPP protocols:
UE know Default Paging DRX= rf128 which eNodeB configure
by SIB2. From UE log, UE has no specific paging cycle, so it is
infinite.
UE take min(rf128, specific paging cycle at UE side)= rf128 as
paging cycle to compute PF(Paging Frame) and PO(Paging
Occasion) as occasion UE receive paging.
UE send specific Paging DRX to MME by NAS message when
UE attach.
Problem Analysis
2.Protocol Analysis of Paging Cycle
MME is expected to decide paging DRX based on UE specific Paging cycle. If UE doesnt specify the DRX parameter in ATTACH
REQUEST message, the MME is expected not to contain the PagingDRX IE in S1-AP Paging. So the protocol revises the presence of the IE
from Mandatory to Optional.
Though the Default Paging DRX value eNodeB send to MME at S1 SETUP REQUEST is v32, this value is for an eNodeB level, not a cell
level (Paging is a cell level procedure for smarter paging). This value is paging timeout timer for MME. However, the protocol doesnt
specify the MME should use it as a PagingDRX Cycle in paging procedure.
However, MME uses this value as PagingDRX in S1AP-Paging message. Then ENB takes min (PagingDRX, DefaultPagingCycle,) =min
(32,128) =rf32 as paging DRX parameters.
In conclusion, the misunderstanding of MME causes the mismatch paging parameters between UE and ENB. This mismatch causes the
paging failure and missing call.
Root Cause
ZTE MME misunderstands in taking Default Paging DRX=rf32 contained in message S1 SETUP REQUEST as
DefaultPagingCycle and send it to eNodeB. In fact, MME is expected to decide paging DRX based on UE specific paging
cycle reported. If UE doesnt specify the DRX parameter in ATTACH REQUEST message, the MME is expected not to
contain the PagingDRX IE in S1-AP Paging.
This makes a mismatch of paging parameters between UE and ENB. This would result in the failure of Mt-Access.
Corrective Action
Workaround:
Modify MML configuration: DefaultPagingCycle=rf32
Solution:
MME is expected not to contain the PagingDRX IE in S1-AP Paging
THANK YOU!