MKT 465 ch2 Seh
MKT 465 ch2 Seh
Brand Equity
and
Brand Positioning
2
h
C
:
5
6
4
MKT
Ch s
d
a
He
1. Customer-based
Brand Equity
(CBBE)
2. Sources of Brand
Equity
3. Brand Positioning
4. Establishing
Positioning
5. Positioning
Guidelines
6. Brand Mantra
Negative Equity:
unfavorable Response
3 constructs of Brand
Equity
Creating the
Brand Differential
Effect : Generic
(price based
competition) vs
Brand (Value
based competition)
Creating Brand
Knowledge
Ensuring Positive
Response:
reflected on
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
Inv ld be
u
o
sh sed on
u
c
fo
y
t
i
l
t
a
u
qu ing b y
t
d
l
i
i
t
n
bu
a
t
u
n
q
e
e
m
th vest
n
i
f
o
Better Perceptions
Greater Loyalty
Larger Margins
Less vulnerability to
Competitive Marketing
Actions and Market Threats
Inelastic response to price
increase and Elastic
response to price decrease
Brand Extension and
Expansion opportunities
Greater Trade/ Gvt Support
awareness
y
t
i
r
a
i
l
i
m
a
f
d
an
nd
a
d
n
a
r
b
e
h
t
h
it
w
,
g
n
o
r
t
s
e
m
o
s
s
B. hold
favorable and
unique brand
associations in
memory
n
w
o
n
k
o
ls
a
e
r
a
These
omponents of
3. Brand Positioning
Brand Positioning
Positioning is designing companys oferings and
image in such a way that is occupies a distinctive
place in the minds of the target customers.
You must establish a mission for the brand and a vision
of what the brand must be and do!
3 levels of Positioning:
A. Positioning by Product Attributes: Pampers,
Colgate, Comtrex, Ritz Carlton Hotel (luxury), Motel
6 (economy) etc
B. Positioning by Product Benefts: Fair and
Lovely, Nike (performance), Volvo (safety)
C. Positioning by creating Values and Beliefs:
Starbucks, Cadbury, Coke, GP.
II. Co
III. Points of Parity
mpet
itors
N
a
t
u
and
(POPs) and Points of
r e of
Comp
Difference (PODs)
etitio
n
Category
Frame
Competitive
of Ref
shoul
d both erences
Co-relational
marke
indus
t
ry com
t an d
PODs : USP based
p titts
ors
and requires proof I. Market Segmeen
a re
s
t
n
e
m
g
e
points/ reasons to Behavioral S
e in
l
b
a
u
l
a
v
t
s
believe (RTB)
often mo
di n g
n
a
r
b
g
n
i
d
understan
ave
h
y
e
h
t
s
a
issues
gi c
II. Nature of
Competition
Direct vs indirect
Multiple frames of ref
Shampoo with Hair Oil
Starbucks : DD,
Nescafe, Local Caf
III. POPs/PODs
PODs: unique value:
IKEA, SONY, British
Airways
POPs: Category: basic
VP s for Caf
POPs: Competitive : BE
at some VP+ some
II.
Ds
O
P
g
n
i
Choos
e
d
i
c
e
d
ons
i
s
t
D
a
r
O
e
P
d
i
e
s
th
e
v
r
3 con
e
s
o
hat
t
t
s
s
e
e
t
t
u
u
rib
t
t
at t r i b
a
t n
(
n
y
a
t
i
t
l
r
i
o
b
p
Desir a r desires: im
e
custom
m)
e
h
t
o
t
t
es
i
n
n
a
a
v
p
e
l
m
e
r
co
d
(
n
a
e
l
s
b
P
a
r
eV
v
r
e
s
D e l i ve
o
t
he
t
s
e
e
i
t
c
i
l
n
i
e
en i
v
n
ca pab
o
c
to
y
c
n
e
i
c
eff i
o
s )
t
r
e
e
v
i
m
t
o
a
t
rel
cus
(
g
n
i
t
le
tia
b
n
a
e
n
r
i
e
a
f
t
f
us
Di
s
n
n
o
i
t
r to
i
e
t
t
e
t
p
a
m
m
co
st
u
m
s
e
nc
e
r
e
f
f
i
d
rs)
e
m
u
s
con
POPs
Dev
e
Pos loping
itio
n
I.
Def ing
n
and ing
Com
atin munic
g
Com the
e Fr petitiv
a
Ref me of
:
II.
Cho
o
POD sing
III.
Est s
a
g P blishin
O
and Ds
IV.
Stra POPs
Pos ddle
itio
ns
e
l
d
d
tra
on
i
t
i
s
Po
ut
b
D
O
S
P
.
n
V
I
s.
P
n
O
o
P
i
s
tit
u
e
o
p
e
om
an
t
c
l
t
u
n
e
r
Si m
e
f
if
d
h
t
wi
6. Brand Mantra: