Basic Business Statistics
(9th Edition)
Chapter 18
Statistical Applications in
Quality and Productivity
Management
2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Chap 18-1
Chapter Topics
Total Quality Management (TQM)
Theory of Management (Demings
Fourteen Points)
Six Sigma Management Approach
The Theory of Control Charts
Common-cause variation versus specialcause variation
Control Charts for the Proportion of
Nonconforming Items
Chap 18-2
Chapter Topics
(continued)
Process Variability
The c Chart
Control Charts for the Mean and the
Range
Process Capability
Chap 18-3
Themes of Quality
Management
1. Primary Focus on Process Improvement
2. Most Variation in Process Due to System
3. Teamwork is Integral to Quality
Management
4. Customer Satisfaction is a Primary Goal
5. Organizational Transformation Necessary
6. Remove Fear
7. Higher Quality Costs Less
Chap 18-4
Demings 14 Points:
Point 1:
Point 1. Create Constancy of Purpose
Act
Plan
Study
Do
The Shewhart-Deming Cycle
Focuses on Constant Improvement
Chap 18-5
Demings 14 Points:
Points 2 and 3
Point 2. Adopt New Philosophy
Better to be proactive and change before
crisis occurs.
Point 3. Cease Dependence on Mass
Inspection to Achieve Quality
Any inspection whose
purpose is to improve
quality is too late.
Chap 18-6
Demings 14 Points:
Points 4 and 5
Point 4. End the Practice of Awarding Business on the
Basis of Price Tag Alone
Develop long term relationship between
purchaser and supplier.
Point 5. Improve Constantly and Forever
Reinforce the importance of the
Shewhart-Deming cycle.
Chap 18-7
Demings 14 Points:
Points 6 and 7
Point 6. Institute Training
Especially important for managers to understand
the difference between special causes and
common causes.
Point 7. Adopt and Institute Leadership
Differentiate between leadership and supervision.
Leadership is to improve the system and achieve
greater consistency of performance.
Chap 18-8
Demings 14 Points:
Points 8 to 12
8. Drive Out Fear
9. Break Down Barriers between Staff Areas
10. Eliminate Slogans
11. Eliminate Numerical Quotas for Workforce
and Numerical Goals for Management
12. Remove Barriers to Pride of
Workmanship
300
Chap 18-9
Demings 14 Points:
Points 13 and 14
Point 13. Encourage Education and Self-Improvement
for Everyone
Quality is
important
Improved knowledge of people
will improve the assets of
the organization.
Point 14. Take Action to Accomplish Transformation
Continually strive toward improvement.
Chap 18-10
Six Sigma Management
A Managerial Approach Designed to
Create Processes that Result in No More
Than 3.4 Defects Per Million
A Method for Breaking Processes into a
Series of Steps in Order to Eliminate
Defects and Produce Near Perfect Results
(1) Define: Define the problem along with
costs, benefits and the impact on customers
(2) Measure:
Measure Develop operational definitions
for each Critical-to-Quality characteristic and
verify measurement procedure to achieve
consistency over repeated measurements
Chap 18-11
Six Sigma Management
(continued)
(3) Analyze:
Analyze Use control charts to monitor
defects and determine the root causes of
defects
(4) Improve:
Improve Study the importance of each
process variable on the Critical-to-Quality
characteristic to determine and maintain the
best level for each variable in the long term
(5) Control:
Control Avoid potential problems that
occur when a process is changed and
maintain the gains that have been made in
the long term
Chap 18-12
Control Charts
Monitor Variation in Data
Exhibit trend - make correction before
process is out of control
A Process - A Repeatable Series of Steps
Leading to a Specific Goal
Chap 18-13
Control Charts
(continued)
Show When Changes in Data are Due to:
Special or assignable causes
Fluctuations not inherent to a process
Represent problems to be corrected
Data outside control limits or trend
Chance or common causes
Inherent random variations
Consist of numerous small causes of random
variability
Chap 18-14
Process Control Chart
Graph of sample data plotted over
time
Special
Cause
Variation
Common
Cause
Variation
80
60
40
20
0
X
UCL
Mean
LCL
Process
Average
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112
Time
Chap 18-15
Control Limits
UCL = Process Average + 3 Standard
Deviations
LCL
X = Process Average - 3 Standard
UCL
Deviations
+ 3
Process
Average
- 3
LCL
TIME
Chap 18-16
Types of Error
First Type:
Belief that observed value represents special
cause when, in fact, it is due to common
cause
Second Type:
Treating special cause variation as if it is
common cause variation
Chap 18-17
Comparing Control Chart
Patterns
X
Common Cause
Variation: No Points
Outside Control
Limits
Special Cause
Variation: 2 Points
Outside Control
Limits
Downward Pattern:
No Points Outside
Control Limits but
Trend Exists
Chap 18-18
When to Take Corrective
Action
Corrective Action Should Be Taken When
Observing Points Outside the Control
Limits or when a Trend Has Been
Detected
Eight consecutive points above the center
line (or eight below)
Eight consecutive points that are increasing
(decreasing)
Chap 18-19
Out-of-Control Processes
If the Control Chart Indicates an Out-ofControl Condition (a Point Outside the
Control Limits or Exhibiting Trend)
Contains both common causes of variation
and assignable causes of variation
The assignable causes of variation must be
identified
If detrimental to quality, assignable causes of
variation must be removed
If increases quality, assignable causes must be
incorporated into the process design
Chap 18-20
In-Control Process
If the Control Chart is Not Indicating Any
Out-of-Control Condition, then
Only common causes of variation exist
It is sometimes said to be in a state of
statistical control
If the common-cause variation is small, then
control chart can be used to monitor the
process
If the common-cause variation is too large,
the process needs to be altered
Chap 18-21
p Chart
Control Chart for Proportions
Is an attribute chart
Shows Proportion of Nonconforming Items
E.g., Count # of nonconforming chairs & divide
by
total chairs inspected
Chair is either conforming or nonconforming
Used with Equal or Unequal Sample Sizes
Over Time
Unequal sizes should not differ by more than
25% from average sample size
Chap 18-22
p Chart
Control Limits
p (1 p )
LCLp p 3
n
Average Group Size
k
n
i 1
# of Samples
p (1 p )
UCL p p 3
n
Average Proportion of
Nonconforming Items
k
# Defective
Items in
Xi
Sample i
i 1
n
i 1
Size of
Sample i
Chap 18-23
p Chart
Example
Youre manager of a
500-room hotel.
You want to achieve
the highest level of
service. For 7 days,
you collect data on
the readiness of
200 rooms. Is the
process in control?
Chap 18-24
p Chart
Hotel Data
Day
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
# Rooms
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
# Not
Ready Proportion
16
0.080
7
0.035
21
0.105
17
0.085
25
0.125
19
0.095
16
0.080
Chap 18-25
p Chart
Control Limits Solution
n
n
i 1
16 + 7 +...+ 16
1400
200
7
X
i 1
k
n
i 1
121
.0864
1400
.0864 3
.0864 1 .0864
p3
200
n
.0864 .0596 or .0268,.1460
p 1 p
Chap 18-26
p Chart
Control Chart Solution
0.15
UCL
0.10
Mean p
0.05
LCL
0.00
1
3
4
Day
Individual points are distributed around
without any
p
pattern. Any improvement in the process must come
from reduction of common-cause variation, which is the
responsibility of the management.
Chap 18-27
p Chart in PHStat
PHStat | Control Charts | p Chart
Excel Spreadsheet for the Hotel Room
Example
Micros oft Excel
Works heet
Chap 18-28
Variability:
Red Bead Example
Four workers (A, B, C, D) spend 3 days to collect
beads, at 50 beads per day. The expected
number of red beads to be collected per day per
worker is 10 or 20%.
Worker
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
9 (18%)
11 (12%)
6 (12%)
26 (17.33%)
12 (24%)
12 (24%)
8 (16%)
32 (21.33%)
13 (26%)
6 (12%)
12 (24%)
31(20.67%)
7 (14%)
9 (18%)
8 (16%)
24 (16.0%)
Totals
41
38
34
All Days
113
Chap 18-29
Variability:
Example Calculations
Average
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
10.25
9.5
8.5
9.42
20.5%
19%
17%
18.83%
113
p
.1883
50(12)
All Days
p (1 p )
.1883(1 .1883)
p 3
.1883 3
n
50
.1883 .1659
LCL .1883 .1659 .0224
UCL .1883 +.1659 .3542
Chap 18-30
Variability:
Example Control Chart
UCL
.30
.20
.10
LCL
0
A1
B1
C1
D1 A2
B 2 C2
D2
A3
B3
C3
D3
Chap 18-31
Morals of the Example
Variation is an inherent part
of any process.
The system is primarily
responsible for worker
performance.
Only management can change the system.
Some workers will always be above
average,
and some will be below.
Chap 18-32
The c Chart
Control Chart for Number of
Nonconformities (Occurrences) in a Unit
(an Area of Opportunity)
Shows Total Number of Nonconforming
Items in a Unit
Is an attribute chart
E.g., Count # of defective chairs manufactured
per day
Assume that the Size of Each Subgroup
Unit Remains Constant
Chap 18-33
c Chart Control Limits
LCLc c 3 c
UCLc c 3 c
Average Number of
Occurrences
k
c
i 1
# of Occurrences in Sample i
# of Samples
Chap 18-34
c Chart: Example
Youre manager of a
500-room hotel.
You want to achieve
the highest level of
service. For 7 days,
you collect data on
the readiness of
200 rooms. Is the
process in control?
Chap 18-35
c Chart: Hotel Data
Day
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
# Rooms
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
# Not
Ready
16
7
21
17
25
19
16
Chap 18-36
c Chart:
Control Limits Solution
k
c
i 1
16 7 L 19 16
17.286
7
LCLc c 3 c 17.286 3 17.285 4.813
UCLc c 3 c 29.759
Chap 18-37
c Chart:
Control Chart Solution
30
UCL
20
10
LCL
0
1
3
4
Day
Individual points are distributed around
without any
pattern. Any improvement in the process must come
from reduction of common-cause variation, which is the
responsibility of the management.
Chap 18-38
Variables Control Charts:
R Chart
Monitors Variability in Process
Characteristic of interest is measured on
numerical scale
Is a variables control chart
Shows Sample Range Over Time
Difference between smallest & largest values
in inspection sample
E.g., Amount of time required for luggage to
be delivered to hotel room
Chap 18-39
R Chart
Control Limits
UCLR D4 R
From
Table
LCLR D3 R
k
R
i 1
Sample Range at
Time i or Sample i
# Samples
Chap 18-40
R Chart
Example
Youre manager of a
500-room hotel.
You want to analyze
the time it takes to
deliver luggage to
the room. For 7
days, you collect
data on 5 deliveries
per day. Is the
process in control?
Chap 18-41
R Chart and Mean Chart
Hotel Data
Day
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sample
Average
5.32
6.59
4.88
5.70
4.07
7.34
6.79
Sample
Range
3.85
4.27
3.28
2.99
3.61
5.04
4.22
Chap 18-42
R Chart
Control Limits Solution
k
R
i 1
3.85 4.27 L 4.22
3.894
7
UCLR D4 R 2.114
3.894 8.232
LCLR D3 R 0
3.894 0
From Table
(n = 5)
Chap 18-43
R Chart
Control Chart Solution
Minutes
8
6
4
2
0
1
2
UCL
_
R
LCL
4
Day
Chap 18-44
Variables Control Charts:
X
Mean Chart (The
Chart)
Shows Sample Means Over Time
Compute mean of inspection sample over
time
E.g., Average luggage delivery time in hotel
Monitors Process Average
Must be preceded by examination of the R
chart to make sure that the process is in
control
Chap 18-45
Mean Chart
UCLX X A2 R
LCLX X A2 R
k
X
i 1
Computed
From
Table
Sample
Mean at
Time i
k
and R
R
i 1
Sample
Range
at Time i
# Samples
Chap 18-46
Mean Chart Example
Youre manager of a
500-room hotel. You
want to analyze the
time it takes to deliver
luggage to the room.
For 7 days, you collect
data on 5 deliveries
per day. Is the process
in control?
Chap 18-47
R Chart and Mean Chart
Hotel Data
Day
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sample
Average
5.32
6.59
4.88
5.70
4.07
7.34
6.79
Sample
Range
3.85
4.27
3.28
2.99
3.61
5.04
4.22
Chap 18-48
Mean Chart
Control Limits Solution
k
X
i 1
k
k
R
i 1
5.32 6.59 L 6.79
5.813
7
From
3.85 4.27 L 4.22
3.894
7
Table E.9
(n = 5)
UCLX X A2 R 5.813 0.577
3.894 8.060
LCLX X A2 R 5.813 0.577
3.894 3.566
Chap 18-49
Mean Chart
Control Chart Solution
Minutes
8
6
4
2
0
1
2
UCL
__
X
LCL
4
Day
Chap 18-50
R Chart and Mean Chart
in PHStat
PHStat | Control Charts | R & Xbar
Charts
Excel Spreadsheet for the Hotel Room
Example
Micros oft Excel
Works heet
Chap 18-51
Process Capability
Process Capability is the Ability of a Process
to Consistently Meet Specified CustomerDriven Requirements
Specification Limits are Set by Management
in Response to Customers Expectations
The Upper Specification Limit (USL) is the
Largest Value that Can Be Obtained and
Still Conform to Customers Expectation
The Lower Specification Limit (LSL) is the
Smallest Value that is Still Conforming
Chap 18-52
Estimating Process
Capability
Must Have an In-Control Process First
Estimate the Percentage of Product or
Service Within Specification
Assume the Population of X Values is
Approximately Normally Distributed with
Mean Estimated
X by and Standard
Deviation Estimated
by
R / d2
Chap 18-53
Estimating Process
Capability
(continued)
For a Characteristic with an LSL and a
USL
P(an outcome will be within specification)
P(LSL X USL)
LSL X
USL X
= P
Z
R / d2
R
/
d
2
where Z is a standardized normal random
variable
Chap 18-54
Estimating Process
Capability
(continued)
For a Characteristic with Only a LSL
P(an outcome will be within specification)
P(LSL X )
LSL X
= P
Z
R / d2
where Z is a standardized normal random
variable
Chap 18-55
Estimating Process
Capability
(continued)
For a Characteristic with Only a USL
P(an outcome will be within specification)
P(X USL)
USL X
= P Z
R
/
d
2
where Z is a standardized normal random
variable
Chap 18-56
Process Capability Example
Youre manager of a
500-room hotel. You
have instituted a policy
that 99% of all luggage
deliveries must be
completed within 10
minutes or less. For 7
days, you collect data
on 5 deliveries per day.
Is the process capable?
Chap 18-57
Process Capability:
Hotel Data
Day
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sample
Average
5.32
6.59
4.88
5.70
4.07
7.34
6.79
Sample
Range
3.85
4.27
3.28
2.99
3.61
5.04
4.22
Chap 18-58
Process Capability:
Hotel Example Solution
n5
X 5.813
R 3.894 and d 2 2.326
P(A delivery is made within specification)
= P(X 10)
10 5.813
= P Z
3.894 / 2.326
= P( Z 2.50) .9938
Therefore, we estimate that 99.38% of
the luggage deliveries will be made
within the 10 minutes or less
specification. The process is capable of
Chap 18-59
Capability Indices
Aggregate Measures of a Process Ability
to Meet Specification Limits
The larger (>1) the values, the more capable
a process is of meeting requirements
Measure of Process Potential Performance
USL LSL specification spread
Cp
process spread
6 R / d2
Cp>1 implies that a process has the potential
of having more than 99.73% of outcomes
within specifications
Chap 18-60
Capability Indices
(continued)
Measures of Actual Process Performance
For one-sided specification limits
X LSL
CPL
3 R / d2
USL X
CPU
3 R / d2
CPL (CPU) >1 implies that the process mean is
more than 3 standard deviations away from
the lower (upper) specification limit
Chap 18-61
Capability Indices
(continued)
For two-sided specification limits
C pk min CPL, CPU
Cpk = 1 indicates that the process average is 3
standard deviations away from the closest
specification limit
Larger Cpk indicates larger capability of
meeting the requirements
Chap 18-62
Process Capability Example
Youre manager of a 500room hotel. You have
instituted a policy that all
luggage deliveries must
be completed within 10
minutes or less. For 7
days, you collect data on
5 deliveries per day.
Compute an appropriate
capability index for the
delivery process.
Chap 18-63
Process Capability:
Hotel Data
Day
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sample
Average
5.32
6.59
4.88
5.70
4.07
7.34
6.79
Sample
Range
3.85
4.27
3.28
2.99
3.61
5.04
4.22
Chap 18-64
Process Capability:
Hotel Example Solution
n5
X 5.813
R 3.894
and d 2 2.326
USL X
10 5.813
CPU
0.833672
3 R / d 2 3 3.894 / 2.326
Since there is only the upper specification limit,
we need to only compute CPU. The capability
index for the luggage delivery process is .8337,
which is less than 1. The upper specification
limit is less than 3 standard deviations above
Chap 18-65
the mean.
Chapter Summary
Described Total Quality Management
(TQM)
Addressed the Theory of Management
Demings 14 Points
Described the Six Sigma Management
Approach
Discussed the Theory of Control Charts
Common-cause variation versus specialcause
variation
Chap 18-66
Chapter Summary
(continued)
Computed Control Charts for the
Proportion of Nonconforming Items
Described Process Variability
Described c Chart
Computed Control Charts for the Mean
and the Range
Discussed Process Capability
Chap 18-67