Structural Considerations & Types of Structure
Structural Considerations & Types of Structure
INTRODUCTION
We usually conceive of organisation
structure as a chart consisting of boxes In
which the name of position or designation of
personnel is written in a hierarchical order
along with the depiction of relationship that
exist between various positions.
To a strategist, an organisation structure is
not only a chart but much more.
WHAT IS ORGANISATION
STRUCTURE?
A organisation structure is the way how
tasks and sub-tasks required to implement a
strategy are arranged.
The diagrammatical representation of
structure could be an organisation chart but
chart shows only the skeleton.
The flesh and blood that bring to life an
organisation are several mechanisms that
support the structure.
STRUCTURAL
MECHANISMS
DEFINITION
Orgaisation structure is the formal
system of task and authority
relationships that control how people
coordinate their actions and use
resources to achieve organisational
goals.
-Gareth R. Jones.
Orgaisational Theory
TYPES OF ORG.
STRUCTURE
MERITS
Quick decision making.
Ability to change with market signals.
Power is centralised.
Informal and simple org. systems.
Control of all the bss activities.
DEMERITS
Ignore strategic decisions
Taking everything on ones head has its
own risks and disadvantages.
It does not encourage the development
of future managers.
This structure becomes Inadequate as
the bss expands.
FUCTIONAL STRUCTURE
In this structure, the organisation is
designed on the basis of the basic
functions, namely, production, finance
and accounting, marketing and personnel.
the need arises for specialised skills and
delegation of authority to managers who
can look after different functional
areas.
MERITS
Efficient disribution of work through
specialisation.
Provides clear definition of functions
and responsibilities.
Delegation of day-to-day operations.
Time for Focus on strategic decisions.
Improve development of functional
expertise.
Simplifies training.
DEMERITS
Crates difficulty in coordination among
different functional areas.
Leads to functional, and line and staff
conflicts .
Promotes narrow specialisation and
potential rivalry or conflict.
DIVISIONAL STRUCTURE
As organisation structure expands and
diversifies, divisional structure comes
into existence.
Functional structure is inadequate when
growth and complexity increasing in terms
of geographic expansion, market
segmentation and diversification.
These types of organisations divide the
functional areas of the organisations to
division.
MERITS
Each product line gets concentrated
attention.
It places responsibilities for profits at
the divisional level.
It facilitates measurement of unit
performance.
Good training ground for strategic
managers.
Encourages general management
development.
DEMERIS
If there are too many divisions, coordination
becomes complex and difficult.
Problem with the extent of authority given
to division managers.
Potential for policy inconsistencies between
divisions.
Increase the problems of top management
control.
It may give rise to conflicts between various
divisions.
SBU STRUCTURE
A SBU has been defined by sharplin, as
any part of bss orgaisationn which is
treated separately for strategic
management purposes.
When organisations face difficulties in
managing divisional structure, it
becomes difficult for the top
management to exercise strategic
control.
MERITS
Advantages of decentralization.
Improve coordination between divisions.
Channels accountability to distinct bss
units.
Encourages general management
development.
Facilitates distinct and in-depth bss
planning at a corporate & bss level.
DEMERITS
MATRIX STRUCTURE
Matrix structure is a combination of
structures, so it becomes popular.
It may take the form of combining
product and geographical divisions or
functional and divisional structure.
Such type of structure is created by
assigning functional specialists, who
normally work in a department in their
area of specialisation.
MERITS
It promotes development to the
managers through increased involvement
in decision making.
Combination of advantages of different
alternative structures.
Allow individual specialists to be
assigned where their talent is the most
needed.
Provides good exposure to specialists in
general management.
DEMERITS
Dual accountability creates confusion
and difficulty.
Requires a high level of vertical and
horizontal coordination.
Shared authority may create
communication problems.
Scope for conflicts.
It may take more time for decision.
NETWORK STRUCTURE
A network design is a cluster of
different organizations whose actions
are coordinated by contracts and
agreements rather than through a
formal hierarchy of authority.
More often one organization takes the
lead in creating the network as it
searches for a way to increase
effectiveness.
OTHER
ORGANISATIONAL
STRUCTURES
PRODUCT-BASED
STRUCTURE
The grouping of activities on the basis
of the product or product lines is
followed by organisation where there is
a need to delegate to a division all
function related to that particular
product or product line.
Such a need arises when the strategy
adopted requires exclusive attention to a
product or a group of product.
CUSTOMER-BASED
STRUCTURE
In some organisatations division may be
created on the basis of the customer group
served.
The rationale foe customer based structure
is that grouping of activities on the basis of
customer would enable the organisatation
to provide exclusive attenntion to separate
and distinict customer group.
PROCESS-BASED
STRUCTURE
In organisations where production
or service is
organised on the basis of processes (or
equipments), a process-based structure
is feasible.
GEOGRAPHIC
STRUCTURE
ITREPRENEURIAL
STRUCTURE
The interpreneurial
structure offers