The document discusses the differences between principles-based and rules-based accounting standards. In the early 2000s, there was concern about the complexity of accounting standards and increased use of rule-based standards. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 directed the SEC to study adopting principles-based standards. Principles-based standards are better able to adapt to changes and encourage judgment, while rules-based standards provide more guidance but can encourage financial engineering. International convergence efforts between the FASB and IASB aimed to reduce differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
739 views
Rule Based-Principal Based
The document discusses the differences between principles-based and rules-based accounting standards. In the early 2000s, there was concern about the complexity of accounting standards and increased use of rule-based standards. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 directed the SEC to study adopting principles-based standards. Principles-based standards are better able to adapt to changes and encourage judgment, while rules-based standards provide more guidance but can encourage financial engineering. International convergence efforts between the FASB and IASB aimed to reduce differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10
Principles Based vs Rules Based Accounting Standards
-The early 2000s, concern about the quality and
transparency of accounting information. - one of the main concern was the increasing complexity of FASB standards and the development of rule-based accounting standards. -Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ,SEC to examine the feasibility of a principles-based accounting standards. - in 2003, SEC published its study on adoption of a principle based standards. -The difference between between rule-based and principles-based standards , Continuum ranging from highly rigid standards on one end to to general definitions of economics-based concepts on the other end
Principle based Better able to cope with speed of change of business environment Less Voluminous Encourages use of professional judgment with focus on what is right Seen as possibly discouraging financial engineering
Rule based More workable in large, complex economies & countries Less room for interpretation Provides more guidance for practical implementation Less need for explanation in financial statements
The FASB issued an invitation to comment about this issue The AAA Committee was appointed to comment. The committee listed the characteristics that concept-based should possess. In 2003, SEC submitted study to congress about this issue that included the recommendations to FASB. In July 2004,FASB responded to the studys recommendations and noted that some of it were already being implemented The FASBs spesific responses to the recommendations : 1. Issuing Objectives-Oriented Standards 2. Conceptual Framework 3. One U.S. Standard Setter 4. GAAP Hierarchy 5. Access to Authoritative Literature 6. Comprehensive Review of Literature
International Convergence Sept 18, 2002 Norwalk Agreement (Achieve compatibility,Maintain compatibility) 3 Major aspects: 1. Financial Statements Presentation Project 2. Conceptual Framework Project 3. Standards Update Project In April 2004, FASB and IASB fiancial statement presentation project. Has 3 phases : phase A : What constitutes complete set of statements? Phase B : Fundamental issues for presentation of information Phase C : Presentation of interim financial information in U.S. GAAP
Feb 2006, Memorandum of understanding of FASB and IASB Convergence will progress : Boards to reach conclusion on major differences in focused areas (2008 goal) and FASB & IASB seek to make continued progress in other areas November 2009, published progress report : Milestone targets for each project, Commitment to reporting quarterly on progress, Host monthly joint board meetings FASB issued four new statements to bring U.S GAAP into IFRS : - 4 New SFASs(SFAS No. 151 (Superseded), SFAS No. 153 (Superseded),SFAS No. 154,SFAS No. 163) - SFAS No. 141 revised - IASB new standards on borrowing costs & segment reporting
October 2004, FASB and IASB conceptual framework project The eight phases of CFP -Objectives and qualitative characteristics -Definitions of elements, recognition and recognition -Measurement -Reporting entity concept -Boundaries of financial reporting, and presentation and disclosure -Purpose and status of framework -Application of framework to not-for-profit entities -Remaining issues, if any IASB and FASB also working on a numeral of individual standard issues
Conceptual Framework a coherent system of interrelated objectives and fundamentals that is expected to lead to consistent standards and that prescribes the nature, function and limits of financial accounting and reporting. The role of conceptual Framework : - A structured theory of accounting -States the scope and objective of financial reporting -Identifies and defines qualitative characteristics of financial information and the basic elements of accounting -Deals with principles and rules of recognition and measurement, and report disclosures
The Role of Conceptual Framework Issues: Do we need a general theory of accounting? Is current accounting too permissive? Are current accounting practices too inconsistent? Is there too much political interference in the neutrality of accounting reports?
Benefits consistent, logical reporting requirements greater compliance enhanced accountability fewer specific standards enhanced understanding of reporting requirements more economical standard setting
Objectives of conceptual framework Financial reporting should provide information that is useful to present and potential investors and creditors and other users in making rational investment, credit and similar decisions. Information should be useful in making economic decisions useful in assessing cash flow prospects about enterprise resources, claims to those resources and changes in them