100% found this document useful (1 vote)
563 views

Docking With ArgusLab

Mark Thompson from Planaria Software describes Argusa!, a molecular docking software. It uses two docking engines (ShapeDock and GADock) and an empirical scoring function (AScore) to predict ligand-protein binding in under 30 seconds. ShapeDock approximates an exhaustive search similar to other docking programs. GADock uses a genetic algorithm. AScore is based on terms from the DrugScore scoring function and was optimized using a training data set. Planaria has used Argusa! to accurately dock inhibitors to the binding site of influenza virus neuraminidase.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
563 views

Docking With ArgusLab

Mark Thompson from Planaria Software describes Argusa!, a molecular docking software. It uses two docking engines (ShapeDock and GADock) and an empirical scoring function (AScore) to predict ligand-protein binding in under 30 seconds. ShapeDock approximates an exhaustive search similar to other docking programs. GADock uses a genetic algorithm. AScore is based on terms from the DrugScore scoring function and was optimized using a training data set. Planaria has used Argusa! to accurately dock inhibitors to the binding site of influenza virus neuraminidase.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

Mark Thompson

Planaria Software
Seattle, WA
http://www.planaria-software.com
Molecular Docking With Argusa!
"in# the optimal ligan#/protein configurations an# accuratel$ %at least
consistentl$& pre#ict their !in#ing free energ$ without using formal
statistical mechanics approaches.
igan# is fle'i!le.
Protein !in#ing site is fle'i!le %si#e chains an# protein !ack!one&.
Do this in un#er () secon#s on a commo#it$ processor %i#eall$ un#er
* secon# or faster&.
Molecular Docking
Molecular Docking
A complicated search problem
A complicated search problem
We ha+e #e+elope# two #ocking engines an# an empirical scoring function in
Argusa! ,.-.
.
ShapeDock: shape-!ase# metho#, appro'imates e'hausti+e search.
.
GADock: amarckian genetic algorithm similar to AutoDock.
.
AScore: scoring function !ase# on /Score of Wang an# coworkers.
T$pical ShapeDock times for ligan#s with *--*) torsions are 0 1- secon#s on
a 2., 345 Pentium laptop computer.

6ur #ocking co#e is implemente# for !oth interacti+e #ocking an# screening
of ligan# #ata!ases.
Abstract
Abstract
Molecular mo#eling application runs on Win#ows platforms.
ArgusLab 4.0
ArgusLab 4.0

1. Ligand is described as a torsion tree
7o#es are groups of !on#e# atoms that #o not ha+e rotata!le !on#s8
connections !etween no#es are torsions. Topolog$ of tree is crucial to
efficient #ocking. A !alance# tree with a large central no#e is !est.

2. Construct two grids that overlay the binding site
3ri# points marke# as insi#e or outsi#e the free +olume of !in#ing site.
"ine gri# use# to #etermine if atoms of a pose fragment are insi#e or
outsi#e the !in#ing site. 9oarse gri# is use# to esta!lish the search points
insi#e the !in#ing site.

3. At each search point o! interest"
igan#:s root no#e is place# on a search point an# a set of #i+erse an#
energeticall$ fa+ora!le rotations is create#. Translations near the search
point are allowe# to remo+e !umps with the target.
ShapeDock
ShapeDock
Approximates an exhaustive search Approximates an exhaustive search
( (similarities to Fred Dock and !lide" similarities to Fred Dock and !lide"
#. $or each rotation% construct the torsions in breadth&!irst order
;se pre-#efine# torsion +alues !ase# on !on# or#er of central !on#.
;se fine gri# to test newl$ a##e# atoms for !umps with protein an#
intra-ligan# contacts to accept or re<ect pose fragment. Allow small
torsion a#<ustments to minimi5e !umps. %rings are treate# as rigi#&
'. Score pose candidates
Poses can#i#ates are those that sur+i+e the torsion search. The$ are
ranke# to maintain set of 7-lowest energ$ poses %7 t$picall$ )--*)-&.
9lustering poses as the$ are foun# maintains #i+ersit$ in the final set.

(. )pti*i+e the !inal set o! poses
.
9oarse minimi5ation of all poses.
.
=e-cluster an# rank using more aggressi+e cluster cutoff.
.
Minimi5e 2) lowest energ$ poses more aggressi+el$.
.
Stochastic search of 2) lowest poses to fin# near!$ minima.

ShapeDock
ShapeDock

Translation

=igi#-!o#$ rotation

Torsions

Population of in#i+i#uals

"itness of each is #ocking


score

>ach generation:

Select !ree#ing in#i+i#uals

Mutation

9rosso+er

ocal minimi5ation

>litism

9heck for con+ergence


3enetic Degrees of "ree#om Search proce#ure
!ADock
!ADock
Lamarckian !enetic Algorithm
Lamarckian !enetic Algorithm
#ompare
#ompare
!ADock $ ShapeDock
!ADock $ ShapeDock

=o!ust ? 3eneral

Slow, har# to #efine


con+ergence

7ot repro#uci!le
%Stochastic&

9an get caught in a local


minima

Some ligan#/!in#ing site


t$pes still cause pro!lems

"ast@

=epro#uci!le

"ormall$ e'plores all


minima
3ADock ShapeDock
igan#
4$#rogens a##e#
4$!ri#i5ation an# AScore atom t$pes assigne#

Target
9r$stal waters remain
4$!ri#i5ation an# AScore atom t$pes assigne#

Miscellaneous
Atom charges not reAuire#

All steps are #one automaticall$ insi#e Argusa! %no user inter+ention
reAuire#&. 4owe+er, manual mo#ifications to a!o+e ma$ !e #one if #esire#.

,unning the docking calculation:
Select the ligan# an# !in#ing site. Accept #efault parameters %gri# si5e an#
resolution& or mo#if$ them. =un the #ocking.
Sample %reparation and &un
Sample %reparation and &un
2., 345 Pentium%=& , Dell Bnspiron laptop
ShapeDock' ()pical (imings
ShapeDock' ()pical (imings
Target igan# Torsions Time
%sec&
*4PC C/,DE *, 2*
*4C= /F2G1 E *G
,D"= Methotre'ate H 1
*B>P 3lee+ec D **
*9I/ Ien5$lsuccinate ) )
*STP Iiotin ) 1
1PTI Ien5ami#ine - *

AScore
AScore
an empirical scoring *unction an empirical scoring *unction
AScore is !ase# on terms taken from the 4PScore piece of /Score
J*K
J*K L"urther #e+elopment an# +ali#ation of empirical scoring functions for structure-!ase# !in#ing affinit$ pre#ictionM Wang, =, ai, , an# Wang, S. N. 9omp. Ai#e# Mol.
Design *G, **-2G, 2--2
3
!in#
O 3
+#w
P 3
h$#ropho!ic
P 3
4-!on#
P 3
4-!on# %chg&
P 3
#eformation
P 3
-

3
+#w
O 9
CDW
CDW
3
h$#ropho!ic
O 9
h$#ropho!ic
4P
3
4-!on#
O 9
4-!on#
4I
3
4-!on# %chg-chg ? chg-neutral&
O 9
4-!on#%chg&
4I
3
#eformation
O 9
rotor
=T
3
-
O 9
regression

AScore
AScore
Sum is o+er h$#ropho!ic ligan#-protein atom pairs
f%#
i<
& O *.- # 0 #
i<,-
P -.)Q
O 2/1 %#
-
P 2 R #& #
i<,-
P -.) Q 0 # 0O #
i<,-
P 2.- Q
O - # S #
i<,-
P 2.- Q
-. O
( )

protein
j
ij
ligand
i
d f
/D0 O

>
1
1
]
1

,
_

,
_

+
1
1
]
1

,
_

,
_

ligand
i
ligand
i j
ij
ij
ij
ij
protein
j
ij
ij
ij
ij
ligand
i
r
d
r
d
r
d
r
d
,
- ,
E
- ,
,
- ,
E
- ,
2 2
#
i<,-
is sum of +#W ra#ii of atoms i,<
intra-ligan# CDW e'clu#es *-2, *-1 !on#e# pairs.
AScore
AScore
,1 O

RT
i
O - atom i not in+ol+e# in an$ torsion.
O -.) atom i in+ol+e# in * torsion.
O *.- atom i in+ol+e# in 2 torsions.
O -.) atom i in+ol+e# in S 2 torsions.

ligand
i
i
RT
-2 O

protein
j
ligand
i
HB
i<
-2
i<
O f%r
i<
& f%
*,i<
& f%
2,i<
&
r
i<
#istance !etween #onor/acceptor atoms

*,i<
angle !etween #onor root-#onor-acceptor

2,i<
angle !etween #onor-acceptor-acceptor root
>ach term +aries from *.- to -.-
#epen#ing on how close to i#eal
+alue. Ma'imum num!er of 4-
!on#s per #onor/acceptor atom
impose#.
AScore e'ten#s /Score to allow it to !e use# as the #ocking o!<ecti+e
function.
Separate 4-!on# term in+ol+ing charge# #onor an#/or acceptor groups.
Ma'. num!er of 4-!on#s per #onor/acceptor impose# !$ uniforml$ scaling
total foun# to the ma'imum num!er allowe# for an$ gi+en ligan# atom.
igan# has h$#rogens a##e#.
4$#rogens inclu#e# in the CDW term.
9r$stal waters retaine# %!ut h$#rogens not a##e#&. 4-!on#s with cr$stal
waters treate# as ha+ing i#eal 4-!on# geometr$ !ut with a scaling factor fit to
e'periment.
4-!on#s with target metals treate# as i#eal geometr$, !ut with scaling factor fit
to e'periment.
S4 treate# as 4-!on# #onor/acceptor, SS treate# as 4-!on# acceptor.
Bntra-ligan# CDW energ$ inclu#e#.
AScore
AScore
Di**erences +ith ,Score Di**erences +ith ,Score
.Iegin with the pu!lishe# /Score parameters.
J*K
.Iegin with Wang:s #ata set of *-- protein-ligan# structures.
J2K
.=emo+e incorrect structures to get a final training set of E, structures:
1H h$#rophilic, 2- h$#ropho!ic, 2) mi'e#
.Mo#if$ 4-!on# parameters ? other new parameters to impro+e correlation of score of '-ra$
pose an# e'periment !in#ing free.
J*K L"urther #e+elopment an# +ali#ation of empirical scoring functions for structure-!ase# !in#ing affinit$ pre#ictionM Wang, =, ai, , an# Wang, S. N. 9omp. Ai#e# Mol.
Design *G, **-2G, 2--2
J2K L9omparati+e >+aluation of ** Scoring "unctions for Molecular DockingM =en'iao Wang, Tipin u, an# Shaomeng Wang. J. Med. Chem. 2333, 46, 22ED-21-1
Structure
1ype
Correlation
3
!in#
with
3
e'periment

,4SD
2inding
A!!inity
%kcal/mol&
4$#rophilic -.)1 2.1
4$#ropho!ic -.E, 2.-
Mi'e# -.D- 2.*
All Structures 3.53 2.2

%arameteri-ation $ .alidation
%arameteri-ation $ .alidation
(in progress" (in progress"
Dock the training set using the ShapeDock engine.
Structure
1ype
Correlation
3
!in#
with
3
e'periment

,4SD
2inding
A!!inity
%kcal/mol&
Ave.
,4SD%Q&
4$#rophilic -.,1 2., *.,
4$#ropho!ic -.E- 2.2 *.H
Mi'e# -.G* 2., *.D
All
Structures
3.(# 2.3 1.(

%arameteri-ation $ .alidation
%arameteri-ation $ .alidation
J*K LThe >ffect of Small 9hanges in Protein Structure on Pre#icte# Iin#ing Mo#es of Fnown Bnhi!itors of Bnfluen5a Cirus 7eruamini#ase: PM"-Scoring in Dock,M Bngo
Muegge, Med. Chem. Res. 9, *HHH, ,H--)--.
(rial Stud)'
(rial Stud)'
/n*luen-a .irus 0euraminidase
/n*luen-a .irus 0euraminidase
J*K
.
3l$coprotein en5$me clea+es sialic aci# resi#ues from maturing +irus particles.
.
>le+en conser+e# resi#ues make up the !in#ing site.
.
Dominate# !$ 4-!on#ing ? charge-charge group interactions %e.g. car!o'$l :
guani#ino&
DA7A 3A7A
*--,--- ' increase
in !in#ing affinit$
-*-.2 kcal/mol -**.E kcal/mol ( 1' enhancement
0euraminidase Dockings
0euraminidase Dockings
ShapeDock
ShapeDock
6 o! the 13 structures reproduced the e7peri*ental binding *ode.
Correlation of predicted and measured binding affinities
&
1
2 0.30
Ave. &MSD 2 4.55 Angstroms
641
644
640
67
640 67 68 63 69 65 64 6: 61
log IC50
A
S
c
o
r
e

S
c
o
r
e

(
k
c
a
l
/
m
o
l
)
.
ShapeDock an# 3ADock engines %BDock>ngine interface, Dock>ngine"actor$, etc&.
.
AScore scoring function with mo#ifia!le parameter set %BScore interface&.
.
>as$ to make the ligan# an# !in#ing site groups with one mouse click.
.
Dock ligan# as fle'i!le, rigi#, or using onl$ selecte# torsions.
.
Score current pose, optimi5e current pose, an# full #ocking.
.
Scoring function pre-e+aluate# on a scoring gri#%s&.
.
Data!ase #ocking supports SD" file as ligan# #ata!ase %BDataSource&.
.
>fficient reuse of scoring an# #ocking gri#s allows user to interacti+el$
mo#if$ ligan# or choose new ligan# an# Auickl$ #ock new structures.
.
=esults summari5e# in e'ternal file an# in a tree-+iew. ;ser can click on
poses to +iew #etails.
Docking in ArgusLab 4.0
Docking in ArgusLab 4.0
.
3D interactive *olecule builder 8 viewer
.
Co*putational e7peri*ents
.UM: >'ten#e# 4uckel, Semi-empirical %M7D6, AM*, PM1&, VB7D6, an# ab initio %+ia interface
to 3aussian HE/-1&.
.MM: ;ni+ersal "orce "iel# %;""&, 9C"", AMI>=, custom force fiel#s for research. Polari5a!le
molecular mechanics, =appe ? 3o##ar#:s charge eAuili!ration scheme for ;"".
.3eometr$ optimi5ations, electronic e'cite# states, MD simulations, free-energ$ pertur!ation, an#
potential of mean force.
.UM/MM an# UM/MMpol.
.Molecular Docking.
.
.roperties 8 *isc. #ipole moments, atom-charges, transition properties, surface properties,
animate normal mo#es, +iew #ock poses, ri!!ons, sol+ent-accessi!le surfaces, S9=" sol+ent effects,
e'plicit sol+ent, perio#ic !oun#ar$ con#itions, >wal# sums, etc.
.
4anage9organi+e results: tree+iew tool for e#iting structures an# +iewing results. =esults
an# structures can !e sa+e# in Argusa! /M file.
ArgusLab #apabilities
ArgusLab #apabilities

.
Multi-#ocument interface, multi-threa#e#.
.
Written in 9PP %some ol# legac$ 9-co#e is wrappe# in 9PP&
.
;ses 6pen3 for graphics, Win12 APB for win#owing s$stem.
.
3ar!age collection for graphics o!<ects, e+ents, etc.
.
9ustom hash-ta!les ? containers in a##ition to use of ST.
.
9ustom Mo#el-Ciew-9ontroller %MC9& transport la$er.
.
1D e#itor !uilt on a comman# processor mo#el %support un#o/re#o&.

:nstalled ;ser 2ase
.
(2-,--- #ownloa#s/licenses.
.
Popular in uni+ersit$ teaching programs an# with stu#ents. %free &
.
;se# in se+eral in#ustrial settings.
Arguslab Architecture
Arguslab Architecture
Score the %D;bind Database
Score the %D;bind Database
Score the DEG structures from the PDI!in# #ata!ase
J*K

%*, incorrect structures were remo+e# from the original E-- in #ata!ase&
J*K LThe PDI!in# Data!ase: 9ollection of Iin#ing Affinities for Protein-igan# 9omple'es with Fnown Three-Dimensional StructuresM =en'iao Wang, /ueliang "ang, Tipin
u, an# Showmeng Wang. J. Med. Chem. 233#, 47, 2HDD-2HE-
.D2bind
Database
Correlation
3
!in#
with
3
e'periment

,4SD
2inding
A!!inity
%kcal/mol&
DEG Structures -.,D 2.H

You might also like