Lab Module 05
Lab Module 05
Lab Module 05
Entity Routing
Copyright 2013 - Jeffrey S. Smith and Simio LLC | All Rights Reserved
Lab Outline
Video 1 Using Selection Weights for probabilistic routing Video 2 Using Selection Weights for conditional routing Video 3 Using Node Lists for dynamic routing Video 4 Assignments
Copyright 2013 - Jeffrey S. Smith and Simio LLC | All Rights Reserved
Arrive
Adjust
Inspect
80% Pass
Depart
1-p
= + =
1
4
Copyright 2013 - Jeffrey S. Smith and Simio LLC | All Rights Reserved
Selection Weights
w1 w2
wn
=1
5
Arrive
Adjust
80% Pass
Approx. 10 minutes
Server1
Approx. 5 minutes
Depart
Server3
Approx. 1 minute
Copyright 2013 - Jeffrey S. Smith and Simio LLC | All Rights Reserved
Video 4 - Assignment
Using the TV Adjust/Inspect model:
Fix the issue where the TVs are adjusted the 4th (and inspected) time even though we know that they will be rejected after inspection. Hint: Start by inserting a Basic Node in the path from the Inspect server back to the Adjust server. Create a reference property for the maximum number of adjustments allowed and develop an experiment that compares the configurations with values 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 100.
Copyright 2013 - Jeffrey S. Smith and Simio LLC | All Rights Reserved
Video 4 - Assignment
Using the dynamic routing model (from the third video):
Develop an experiment with 25 replications using a run length of 500 hours with a 250 hour warmup and responses for the three server utilizations, the entity time in system (TIS) and entity number in system (NIS) Using the base model, compare the 5 performance metrics using the following routing alternatives: 1. Probabilistic routing using the selection weights 6/78, 12/78, and 60/78 2. Preferred order with capacity 5 buffers at each server 3. Using AssociatedStationOverload with no buffers (capacity 0 buffers) 4. Using AssociatedStationOverload with capacity 5 buffers 5. Using the shortest queue length with infinite capacity buffers
Copyright 2013 - Jeffrey S. Smith and Simio LLC | All Rights Reserved