Problem Solving
Problem Solving
1
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Session Objectives
1. Overview of Thinking Dimensions LLC and KEPNERandFOURIE methodology 2. Overview recent research in the filed of Problem Solving and Decision Making language for critical thinking 3. Demonstration of one of the Thinking Dimensions (Decision Making) via a case study
2
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Approach
Bring proven decision making and thinking methodologies to assist clients battling growth, cost, productivity and innovation challenges Our collaborative strategy, process improvement and KEPNERandFOURIE Thinking Technologies guide the development of effective corporate strategies, operational improvements, innovation and L&D solutions
About KEPNERandFOURIE
Dr. Chuck Kepner
4
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
5
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
1. RATIONAL THINKING
Uses information from direct observation and information that has been gathered from reliable sources considered most reliable and valid
2. INTUITIVE THINKING
What a person has seen and experienced over the years
3. CREATIVE THINKING
Putting known elements together to form new ideas and visions
7
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
PUZZLE Exercise
Everybody is an expert
Appreciation of the differences
9
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Process
What first?
Output
Business Results Clarified Situations Prioritized Issues Problems Solved Decisions Made Plans Protected
Intuitive
Quality
Quality
Quality
Questioning is key Makes your Thinking Visible Provides a Consistent Common Language
10
Copyright 2007 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
11
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Ohio State University 356 Corporate American Decisions 228 implemented Only 90 still in force after 2 years
356
Decisions
228
90
2 years
Implement
12
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Decisions by decree
100%
271 Decisions taken by decree Only 143 (53%) implemented Only 10 (7% of 143) successful
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
271
Decree
143
Implem't
10
Success
13
85
Part'ion
85
Implem't
80
Success
14
Three blunders
Rush to judgment Pressure from the top Take first solution being presented Failure is 4 times more likely Misuse of resources (Spending time and money on the wrong things) Not exploring the reasons or background to the decision situation No stakeholder analysis vested interest Not finding an all-inclusive answer Failure to use any decision process methodologies Poor collaboration and/or participation Using an incomplete process Using power and/or persuasion Will take too long
15
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Nature is to compare alternatives against each other Recipe for disaster First sort out the purpose Then get the requirements Compare alternatives to requirements
Requirements
16
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
17
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Improving:
Looking beyond the immediate fix to make fixes less frequent by making things better
Innovating: Thinking creatively about cause and effect (the old way is not good enough)
Avoiding:
Thinking of how to get around the situation to remove or neutralize the cause
18
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Rules:
Develop
19
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
20
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Rules:
How:
Internal
Company Customers
External
Competitors Suppliers Influencers (activists, media, associations) Facilitators (Govt, Regulators, Licensing authorities)
22
Copyright 2007 Thinking Dimensions www.thinkingdimensions.com
Employees
Marketing Vice-President Suppliers IT Division Head
23
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
What main and secondary results do you want to achieve with this solution?
Risks to Avoid
What money, time and other resources are you permitted to spend, preserve and/or minimize? Any requirements out of your control? (e.g. time, money, legal, political)
Intuitive approach: List stakeholders, brainstorm requirements in general and then check whether all stakeholders were considered Analytical approach: List stakeholders, brainstorm all requirements for each individual stakeholder 24
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
25
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Rules:
27
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Risks to avoid
28
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
29
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
30
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
31
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
32
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
33
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
34
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
35
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
36
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
37
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
How:
Rules:
Adverting
3.6%
Some will remember after initial period 5 months
Credit
2.4%
Lock-in for at least 2 years 7 months or longer
Direct
3.6%
Convenience will make them stay longer Within 2 months Learning how to do it
Contest
3%
Short burst only
3 months
No effect
None at all
No effect
65K
74.6K
54K
60K
No effect
More complicated
Minor effect 40
Rule:
2. Market and issue Credit Cards to existing client base. Couple this to an internal and external contest for suggesting a friend or family member to the banks credit card campaign.
42
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
43
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
KEPNERandFOURIE tools have helped us to substantially improve our project lead time by providing the missing link for us in resolving special cause problems by leveraging systematic critical thinking. These are the tools and methodologies that Black Belts and Green Belts cannot afford to go without.
Don Lynch, Master Black Belt, SKF USA
44
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
"The KEPNERandFOURIE RCA is a powerful process that helps us think through and resolve problems in a structured and visible manner. I strongly endorse this training. Significantly, it helps our Green and Black belts to implement their Lean Six Sigma initiatives." Doug Smith, MBB, Dean of NAVSEA College
45
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
CauseWise Why?
Purpose: To find the true cause(s) of a deviation
Steps:
46
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Problem Definition
STANDARD DEVIATION
ACTUAL
Past
Now
95% not having the correct people around the table Dealing with suspect information Average time to resolution is six (6) + months
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
1Q
2Q
3Q
4Q
Problem solved
48
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
B ud
ge t
- Ineffective 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1st Qtr Purpose 2nd Qtr Requirements 3rd Qtr Alternatives 4th Qtr Risks 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1st Qtr Purpose
- Effective -
49
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Blame Fixing
Pitfall is looking for the people reason first First look for the technical reason True Cause Once verified, then look for the people reason Root Cause
Deviation
EVENT
True Cause
TECHNICAL
Root Cause
PEOPLE
50
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
60 50
# Solved
51
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Questions/Comments
Thinking Dimensions LLC
(f) 703-865-6701
[email protected] www.thinkingddimensions.com
52
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
53
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
IS
1 Credit cards
BUT NOT
Savings cards
WHY (NOT)
New supplier More frequently used
Embossing flattened
Dont know
55
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
IS
4 80% r/h/s 20% l/h/s
BUT NOT
Random or any specific place
WHY (NOT)
Half of the card every time Plastic wallet defect
10 days ago
Before/after
Dont know
56
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
IS
4 80% r/h/s 20% l/h/s
BUT NOT
Random or any specific place
WHY (NOT)
Half of the card every time Plastic wallet defect
10 days ago
Before/after
Dont know
Continuous
Sporadic or periodic
Dont know
58
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Alternative Questions 1. When in the sequence of events of the object was the fault first noticed? 2. What was happening to the object in its sequence of events when the fault was first noticed? 3. When in the life cycle of the object was the fault first noticed? 4. Any other cycles?
Question to the void Technique 1. Identify in which phase of the objects life cycle the deviation occurred 2. Once you have identified the phases in the life cycle, it is often useful to identify when specifically in this phase did the deviation occur.
59
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
IS
4 80% r/h/s 20% l/h/s
BUT NOT
Random or any specific place
WHY (NOT)
Half of the card every time Plastic wallet defect
10 days ago
Before/after
Dont know
Continuous
Sporadic or periodic
Dont know
Before 6 months
Dont know
60
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
How:
Rule:
1. The sub-standard plastic card embossed letters, supplied by the new supplier cannot withstand the pressure caused by the manual processing machines.
62
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
1. The sub-standard plastic card embossed letters, supplied by the new supplier cannot withstand the pressure caused by the manual processing machines. 2.The plastic wallet reacts with the embossed letters of the card in some way, making it soft and causing it to go flat.
63
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
Rules:
Must explain both the IS and BUT NOT Test destructively Note all assumptions
64
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.
YES
YES
YES
NO
2.The plastic wallet reacts with the embossed letters of the card in some way, making it soft and causing it to go flat.
YES
YES
YES
A1
A2
YES
YES
A1: Only if some people put the card in the wallet the other way round A2: Only if the reaction takes up to 6 months to take effect
65
Copyright 2008 Thinking Dimensions/KEPNER AND FOURIE All Rights Reserved.