0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views22 pages

ARC Micro Nano Spacecraft and Missions Where's The Sweet Spot?

This document discusses trends and opportunities for micro-nano spacecraft and missions at NASA-Ames Research Center. It summarizes two previous NASA nanosatellite missions, GeneSat-1 and PharmaSat-1, which demonstrated the ability to perform biological experiments on small spacecraft. The document explores next-generation nanosatellite configuration options and payloads. It also examines the need for standardization across different perspectives in space exploration, including NASA, DoD, industry and academia.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views22 pages

ARC Micro Nano Spacecraft and Missions Where's The Sweet Spot?

This document discusses trends and opportunities for micro-nano spacecraft and missions at NASA-Ames Research Center. It summarizes two previous NASA nanosatellite missions, GeneSat-1 and PharmaSat-1, which demonstrated the ability to perform biological experiments on small spacecraft. The document explores next-generation nanosatellite configuration options and payloads. It also examines the need for standardization across different perspectives in space exploration, including NASA, DoD, industry and academia.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

NASA-Ames Research Center … in Silicon

ARC Micro­Nano Spacecraft 
and Missions

Trends and Opportunities
Where’s the Sweet Spot?
John W. Hines
Chief Technologist, Engineering
Directorate
Technical Director, Nanosatellite
Projects
NASA-Ames Research Center
NASA-Ames Nanosa tellite

GeneSat-
PharmaSat-
1
1

Nanosail-
D O/OREOS
GeneSat­1 System/Mission Overview
Launched 16 Dec 2006 aboard USAF Minotaur­1
•Secondary Payload with Tacsat-2
primary
•45° orbit inclination; 390 km altitude
•Spacecraft mass 7.1 kg (4.1 kg + 3 kg
adapter)
•4-5 W on-orbit average power
•60 day mission duration; 96 hr
Biology exp.
•Measured GFP and Optical Density w

Genesat Performed Flawlessly: First Biological Nanosatellite


Pharmasat­1
Microsatellite ­ Free Flyer Project
– Science goal: measure effects of antifungal agent
on yeast
• clinically accepted, well-controlled test
protocols
– Manifested to launch w/ USAF Tacsat-3 1°
spacecraft
• Minotaur-1 launch vehicle, Wallops Flight
facility; Jun08
– µSat Free Flyer: ESMD-funded, 4 mission, 5 year
effort
• develop nanosat-class autonomous space
60-well BioFluidics platforms & technologies
card
• validate key biological responses indicative of
space environmental conditions, human
medical risks

Fluidics/Sample Handling Block


Next Generation Nanosatellite Options

Triple Cube baseline with Beacon or Aux Payload Cylinder


and Deorbit capability (per Pharmasat/OOREOS form
factor).

– Maximum 2.0 kg per cube equiv or 6.0 kg.


– Triple cube equiv baseline designated as 1N, configs = 1N,
2N, 3N, 4N.
– 4N quad = 1Q; 1Q =4 ea 1N in 2x2 (or 1x4) form factor;
– Configs = 1Q, 2Q, 3Q (Special cases only right now).
– Maybe also 1.5 Q (= 32N). (Special cases only)
One Approach for the low end:
Suggesting the NanoSpace Works
Architecture
• Triple Cube baseline with Beacon or Aux Payload
Cylinder and Deorbit capability.

– Maximum 2.0 kg per cube equiv or 6.0 kg.


– Triple cube equiv baseline designated as 1N, therefore
configs = 1N, 2N, 3N, 4N.
– 4N quad = 1Q; therefore 1Q =4 ea 1N in 2x2 form factor;
– Configs = 1Q, 2Q, 3Q (Special cases only right now).
Space Mission Architecture*
(Basic Elements)

Command, Control, Subject


Communications
Architecture

Mission
Concep
t

Mission Orbit and


Operations Constellation

Payload,
Instruments

Space
Element

Ground
Element Launch
* Adapted from W. Larson andJ.Wertz; Spacecraft
Element
“Space Mission Analysis and Design”; Microcosm Bus
Ada pter s, Ada pter s,
Payload Survey
Mass/Power Correlation

UnServ
ed

Negotiated Rideshare

NMP
▲NSTC
♦SER
B
□SmallS
at

ESPA
SIV Limits
CubeSat Limits
1-3x Limits

Excerpt from “Form Follows Function: A Pragmatic Approach to Access-To-Space (ATS) for Space Technology
Experiments” Herrell, 2008 Cubesat Workshop, Logan,
MacNeal/Herrell 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference Utah
Many Different
Perspectives re
• NASA = Science/Research
• DoD = Operational Space
• NRO = National Security
• Industry = Business Advantage
(profit)
• Academia = Education/ Training

• Re Standards… one size may not


fit all
Premise/Hypothesis/Rationale
• Nanosats are getting serious...lots of players...limited
• Launches are becoming available...need more 
interfaces and aggregation
• lots of good technologies and subsystems in 
development...fragmented
• managers and investigators are getting more 
interested
• big spacecraft and LV guys are getting into the game
• need to to define next generation platforms, 
interfaces, and mechanisms
Micro-Nano Spacecraft
Candidates

jwh
090107
NASA’s Missions
Exploration
• Local space
environment
• Return to the Moon
• Manned presence on
Mars (future)
• Space Biology/Human
Health
Science
• Understand the nature
of the solar system and
universe
• Near Earth Objects
(NEO)
• Lunar sciences
• Astrobiology

You might also like