Statistical Quality Control (SQC) Final
Statistical Quality Control (SQC) Final
Content
Basics of Statistical Process Control Control Charts Control Charts for Attributes Control Charts for Variables Control Chart Patterns SPC with Excel Process Capability Six Sigma Design of Six Sigma System
Sample
subset of items produced to use for inspection
Control Charts
process is within statistical control limits
Variability
Random
common causes inherent in a process can be eliminated only through improvements in the system
Non-Random
special causes due to identifiable factors can be modified through operator or management action
SPC in TQM
SPC
tool for identifying problems and make improvements contributes to the TQM goal of continuous improvements
Quality Measures
Attribute
a product characteristic that can be evaluated with a discrete response good bad; yes - no
Variable
a product characteristic that is continuous and can be measured weight - length
Control Charts
A graph that establishes control limits of a process Control limits
upper and lower bands of a control chart
Types of charts
Attributes
p-chart c-chart
Variables
range (R-chart) mean (x bar chart)
Normal Distribution
95% 99.74% -3 -2 -1 =0 1 2 3
c-charts
uses number of defects in an item
The primary difference between using a p-chart and a c-chart is as follows. A p-chart is used when both the total sample size and the number of defects can be computed. A c-chart is used when we can compute only the number of defects but cannot compute the proportion that is defective.
p-Chart
UCL = p + zp LCL = p - zp
z = number of standard deviations from process average p = sample proportion defective; an estimate of process average p = standard deviation of sample proportion p(1 - p) n
p =
p-Chart Example
SAMPLE NUMBER OF DEFECTIVES PROPORTION DEFECTIVE
1 2 3 : : 20
6 0 4 : : 18 200
p(1 - p) = 0.10 - 3 n
Proportion defective
0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 2 LCL = 0.010 4 6 8 10 12 14 Sample number 16 18 20 p = 0.10
c-Chart
UCL = c + zc LCL = c - zc
where
c =
c-Chart (cont.)
Number of defects in 15 sample rooms
SAMPLE
NUMBER OF DEFECTS
1 2 3
12 8 16
: :
15
: :
15 190
12.67
24
UCL = 23.35
21
18 15 12 9 6 3
Number of defects
c = 12.67
c-Chart (cont.)
LCL = 1.99
10
12
14
16
Sample number
x-bar Chart
UCL X z LCL X z
standard deviation
z = standard normal variable (2 for 95.44% confidence, 3 for 99.74% confidence)
SAMPLE k
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
5.02 5.01 4.99 5.03 4.95 4.97 5.05 5.09 5.14 5.01
2
5.01 5.03 5.00 4.91 4.92 5.06 5.01 5.10 5.10 4.98
3
4.94 5.07 4.93 5.01 5.03 5.06 5.10 5.00 4.99 5.08
4
4.99 4.95 4.92 4.98 5.05 4.96 4.96 4.99 5.08 5.07
5
4.96 4.96 4.99 4.89 5.01 5.03 4.99 5.08 5.09 4.99
x
4.98 5.00 4.97 4.96 4.99 5.01 5.02 5.05 5.08 5.03 50.09
R
0.08 0.12 0.08 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.14 0.11 0.15 0.10 1.15
5.10 5.08 5.06 5.04 Mean 5.02 5.00 4.98 4.96 4.94 4.92 | 1 | 2 | 3 | | | | 4 5 6 7 Sample number | 8 | 9 | 10 = x = 5.01
UCL = 5.08
LCL = 4.94
R- Chart
UCL = D4R LCL = D3R
R R= k
where R = range of each sample k = number of samples
R-Chart Example
OBSERVATIONS (SLIP-RING DIAMETER, CM)
SAMPLE k
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
5.02 5.01 4.99 5.03 4.95 4.97 5.05 5.09 5.14 5.01
2
5.01 5.03 5.00 4.91 4.92 5.06 5.01 5.10 5.10 4.98
3
4.94 5.07 4.93 5.01 5.03 5.06 5.10 5.00 4.99 5.08
4
4.99 4.95 4.92 4.98 5.05 4.96 4.96 4.99 5.08 5.07
5
4.96 4.96 4.99 4.89 5.01 5.03 4.99 5.08 5.09 4.99
x
4.98 5.00 4.97 4.96 4.99 5.01 5.02 5.05 5.08 5.03 50.09
R
0.08 0.12 0.08 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.14 0.11 0.15 0.10 1.15
R 1.15 R= = = 0.115 k 10
It is possible for samples to have very narrow ranges, but their averages is beyond control limits.
It is possible for sample averages to be in control, but ranges might be very large.
A Process Is in Control If
1. no sample points outside limits 2. most points near process average 3. about equal number of points above and below centerline 4. points appear randomly distributed
LCL
Only remove points for which you can determine an assignable cause
Variable
Variable
Controllable Inputs
Variable How Measured When Measured
X1
X2 X3
Quality Characteristics: Outputs
LSL
USL
Hi Hi Lo Lo Hi Hi Lo Lo
Hi Hi Hi Hi Lo Lo Lo Lo
3 4
Means
2 .5 2 .0 1. 5 S ubgr 0 .9 1 2 3 4
1. 5
2 .5
3 .5
U C L =0 .9 6 2 1
No rm a l P ro b P lo t
Ranges
0 .6 0 .3 0 .0
R =0 . 5 16 2
L C L =0 .0 7 0 2 7 1.5 2 .5 3 .5
N1
N2 N3
6 7 8
L a st 4 S u b g ro u p s
3 .0
Ca p a b ility P lo t
P ro c e ss To le ra n c e
1.8 3 17 5 2 .9 19 5 8 I I 1 I I I I 4
2 .5 2 .0 1. 5 1 2 3 4
C p : 2 .7 6 C P U : 2 .9 9 C P L : 2 .5 3 C p k : 2 .5 3 Su b g ro u p N u m b e r
Uncontrollable Inputs
Values
Sp e c if ic a t io n s St D e v : 0 .18 13 0 6
PrimWdth
ScrewRPM
X1
X2 X3
Quality Characteristics: Outputs Y1, Y2, etc.
X
Inputs: Raw Materials, components , etc.
LSL
USL
The Process
X
N1 N2 N3
Uncontrollable Inputs
LSL
USL
Process Capability
Tolerances
design specifications reflecting product requirements
Process capability
range of natural variability in a process what we measure with control charts
Process Capability
Design Specifications (a) Natural variation exceeds design specifications; process is not capable of meeting specifications all the time.
Process Design Specifications (b) Design specifications and natural variation the same; process is capable of meeting specifications most of the time. Process
Computing Cp
Net weight specification = 9.0 oz 0.5 oz Process mean = 8.80 oz Process standard deviation = 0.12 oz upper specification limit lower specification limit Cp = 6 9.5 - 8.5 = = 1.39 6(0.12)
Precision
Lesser the standard deviation of the process, more precise or consistent is the process
From a sigma process we come to know that at what distance, in terms of the standard deviation, the specification limits are placed from the target value.
3 Sigma Vs 6 Sigma
The goal of Six Sigma program is to reduce the variation in every process to such an extent that the spread of 12 sigmas i.e. 6 Sigmas on either side of the mean fits within the process specifications. The figure on next slide shows what this looks like.
3 Sigma Vs 6 Sigma
6 Sigma curve
LSL USL
3 Sigma curve
10
11 12 13
14
15
16
In a 3 sigma process the values are widely spread along the center line, showing the higher variation of the process. Whereas in a 6 Sigma process, the values are closer to the center line showing less variation in the process.
Why 6 sigma?
LSL
1.5SD
USL
By shifting 3 sigma process 1.5 SD, we create 66,807 defects per billion opportunities
1.5SD
By shifting 6 sigma process 1.5 SD, we create 3.4defects per billion opportunities
Sigma Level
Sigma level 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DPMO 691,462 308,538 66,807 6,210 233 3.4 0.019 Percent defective 69% 31% 6.7% 0.62% 0.023% 0.00034% 0.0000019% Percentage yield 31% 69% 93.3% 99.38% 99.977% 99.99966% 99.9999981% Cp 0.33 0.67 1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33