International Bills of Human

Rights
1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights
1948
Historical Background and Adoption
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the United
Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948, through Resolution 217A. It
emerged as a direct response to the atrocities committed during World War II
and represented the first global expression of rights to which all human beings
are inherently entitled.
The Declaration was drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural
backgrounds from all regions of the world, led by Eleanor Roosevelt, and was
proclaimed as a "common standard of achievement for all peoples and all
nations."

Legal Status and Significance

Although not legally binding, the UDHR has acquired significant moral and
political authority over time. It has inspired numerous international treaties,
regional human rights instruments, national constitutions, and laws. Many of its
provisions are now considered to have the status of customary international
law, binding on all states.

Structure and Content

The UDHR consists of a preamble and 30 articles setting forth the basic civil,
political, economic, social, and cultural rights that all human beings should
enjoy. The rights can be categorized as follows:

Civil and Political Rights (Articles 3-21)

Right to life, liberty, and security of person (Article 3)

Prohibition of slavery and torture (Articles 4-5)

International Bills of Human Rights 1

 Equality before the law and equal protection of the law (Articles 6-8)

Protection against arbitrary arrest, detention, or exile (Article 9)

Right to a fair trial (Articles 10-11)

Right to privacy and family life (Article 12)

Freedom of movement (Article 13)

Right to asylum (Article 14)

Right to nationality (Article 15)

Right to marry and found a family (Article 16)

Right to own property (Article 17)

Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion (Article 18)

Freedom of opinion and expression (Article 19)

Freedom of peaceful assembly and association (Article 20)

Right to take part in government (Article 21)

Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (Articles 22-27)

Right to social security (Article 22)

Right to work and to protection against unemployment (Article 23)

Right to rest and leisure (Article 24)

Right to an adequate standard of living (Article 25)

Right to education (Article 26)

Right to participate in cultural life (Article 27)

General Provisions (Articles 28-30)

Right to a social and international order (Article 28)

Limitations on rights and freedoms (Article 29)

Protection against misinterpretation (Article 30)

Implementation and Enforcement Mechanisms

The UDHR itself does not create legally binding obligations. However, it has led
to the development of various implementation mechanisms:

International Bills of Human Rights 2

 Inspiration for binding international treaties

Incorporation into national constitutions and laws

Use as interpretive guidance by courts

Basis for monitoring and reporting by UN bodies and NGOs

Educational and awareness-raising initiatives

Impact and Legacy

The UDHR has had profound impact on international human rights law and
policy:

It served as the foundation for the International Covenant on Civil and

Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights

It inspired regional human rights instruments in Europe, the Americas,

Africa, and the Arab world

It has been translated into more than 500 languages, making it the most
translated document in the world

It established human rights as a universal concern, transcending national

sovereignty

It provided a common language for human rights advocacy and diplomacy

2. International Covenant on Civil and

Political Rights
Historical Background and Adoption
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) was adopted by
the United Nations General Assembly on December 16, 1966, and entered into
force on March 23, 1976. It is one of the two treaties that give legal force to the
UDHR, forming part of the International Bill of Human Rights.

The ICCPR took nearly 20 years to draft, reflecting the complex negotiations
during the Cold War era. Unlike the UDHR, the ICCPR is a legally binding treaty
that creates specific obligations for states that ratify it.

International Bills of Human Rights 3

 Legal Status and State Obligations
As a treaty, the ICCPR creates legally binding obligations for states that have
ratified it. States parties must:

Respect and ensure the rights recognized in the Covenant to all individuals
within their territory and subject to their jurisdiction (Article 2)

Take necessary steps to adopt laws or other measures to give effect to

these rights (Article 2)

Ensure effective remedies for violations (Article 2)

Submit reports on measures taken to implement the Covenant (Article 40)

Structure and Content

The ICCPR consists of a preamble and 53 articles divided into six parts:

Part II (Articles 2-5)

Sets out general provisions regarding state obligations, equal rights of men and
women, permissible limitations and derogations, and prohibitions against abuse
of rights.

Key Differences from the UDHR

Legal Status: Unlike the UDHR, the ICCPR is legally binding on states that
have ratified it

Specificity: The ICCPR provides more detailed provisions and clearer state
obligations

Implementation Mechanisms: The ICCPR establishes the Human Rights

Committee and monitoring procedures

Derogation Provisions: Article 4 allows for temporary suspension of certain

rights during public emergencies

Non-Derogable Rights: The ICCPR identifies certain rights that cannot be

suspended even in emergencies

Implementation and Enforcement Mechanisms

Human Rights Committee

International Bills of Human Rights 4

 The ICCPR established the Human Rights Committee, consisting of 18
independent experts who:

Review periodic reports submitted by states parties (Article 40)

Issue General Comments interpreting the Covenant's provisions

Consider interstate complaints when both states have made declarations

under Article 41

Examine individual complaints under the First Optional Protocol

Optional Protocols
Two Optional Protocols supplement the ICCPR:

First Optional Protocol (1966): Establishes an individual complaint

mechanism

Second Optional Protocol (1989): Aims at the abolition of the death penalty

Impact and Challenges

The ICCPR has significantly influenced national and international human rights
protection:

It has been ratified by over 170 states, demonstrating wide acceptance of

its norms

It has led to domestic constitutional and legal reforms in many countries

The Human Rights Committee's jurisprudence has clarified the scope of

protected rights

It has empowered individuals to seek redress for violations through the First
Optional Protocol

However, challenges remain:

Reservations by states that limit the applicability of certain provisions

Weak enforcement mechanisms relying primarily on political pressure

Resource constraints affecting the work of the Human Rights Committee

Tensions between universal standards and cultural diversity

Balancing security concerns with human rights protections

International Bills of Human Rights 5

 Relationship with Other Human Rights Instruments
The ICCPR operates within a broader framework of human rights protection:

Together with the UDHR and the International Covenant on Economic,

Social and Cultural Rights, it forms the International Bill of Human Rights

It complements specialized treaties on racial discrimination, women's

rights, children's rights, etc.

It interacts with regional human rights mechanisms in Europe, the Americas,

Africa, and elsewhere

Its norms influence the work of UN specialized agencies and the UN Human
Rights Council

3. International Covenant on Economic,

Social and Cultural Rights, 1966
Origin and Historical Development
Background Context
The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 16, 1966,
alongside the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Both
covenants entered into force on January 3, 1976, after receiving the required
35 ratifications.

The ICESCR emerged from the recognition that human dignity requires not only
civil and political freedoms but also economic, social, and cultural rights that
ensure basic human needs are met.

Drafting Process and Negotiations

The covenant underwent extensive negotiations from 1947 to 1966, reflecting
ideological divisions during the Cold War:

Western countries emphasized civil and political rights

Socialist countries prioritized economic and social rights

Developing countries sought recognition of the right to development and

self-determination

International Bills of Human Rights 6

 The drafting process involved:

The UN Commission on Human Rights

The Third Committee of the General Assembly

Input from specialized agencies like the ILO and UNESCO

Consultation with non-governmental organizations

Key Provisions and Structure

Preamble
The preamble establishes the fundamental principles:

Recognition of inherent dignity and equal rights of all members of the

human family

Connection between economic, social, cultural rights and civil, political

rights

State obligations under the UN Charter to promote human rights

Individual responsibilities to the community

Part I: Right to Self-Determination (Article 1)

Article 1 recognizes the right of all peoples to:

Freely determine their political status

Pursue economic, social, and cultural development

Freely dispose of natural wealth and resources

Not be deprived of means of subsistence

Part II: General Provisions (Articles 2-5)

Article 2: State Obligations

States parties undertake to:

Take steps to achieve progressive realization of rights using maximum

available resources

Guarantee rights without discrimination

Ensure equal rights for men and women

International Bills of Human Rights 7

 Article 3: Gender Equality
Ensures equal enjoyment of economic, social, and cultural rights for men and
women.

Article 4: Limitations Clause

Rights may only be limited by law for promoting general welfare in a democratic
society.

Article 5: Prohibition of Abuse

Prevents interpretation that would destroy recognized rights or limit them
beyond covenant provisions.

Part III: Substantive Rights (Articles 6-15)

Article 6: Right to Work

Right to freely chosen or accepted work

Technical and vocational training programs

Policies for full and productive employment

Article 7: Right to Just and Favorable Conditions of Work

Fair wages and equal remuneration for equal work

Safe and healthy working conditions

Equal opportunity for promotion

Rest, leisure, and reasonable working hours

Periodic holidays with pay

Article 8: Trade Union Rights

Right to form and join trade unions

Right of trade unions to function freely

Right to establish national and international federations

Right to strike (with lawful restrictions)

Article 9: Right to Social Security

International Bills of Human Rights 8

 Recognition of the right to social security, including social insurance.

Article 10: Protection of Family, Mothers, and Children

Protection and assistance to families

Free consent for marriage

Special protection for mothers before and after childbirth

Protection of children and young persons from exploitation

Article 11: Right to Adequate Standard of Living

Right to adequate food, clothing, and housing

Continuous improvement of living conditions

Freedom from hunger with specific programs for:

Improving food production and distribution

Equitable distribution of world food supplies

Article 12: Right to Health

Right to highest attainable standard of physical and mental health

Measures for:

Reduction of infant mortality

Improvement of environmental and industrial hygiene

Prevention and treatment of diseases

Medical service and attention

Article 13: Right to Education

Compulsory and free primary education

Generally available secondary education

Equally accessible higher education

Fundamental education for those who missed primary education

Development of school systems and improvement of teaching conditions

Article 14: Implementation of Primary Education

International Bills of Human Rights 9

 States without free compulsory primary education must adopt detailed
implementation plans within two years.

Article 15: Cultural Rights and Scientific Progress

Right to participate in cultural life

Right to enjoy benefits of scientific progress

Right to protection of intellectual property

Freedom for scientific research and creative activity

Part IV: Reporting and Monitoring (Articles 16-25)

Reporting Obligations (Articles 16-22)

States must submit reports on implementation measures

Reports reviewed by the Economic and Social Council

Transmission to specialized agencies

General recommendations and technical assistance

International Cooperation (Articles 23-25)

Methods include conventions, recommendations, and technical assistance

Respect for UN Charter provisions

Protection of peoples' rights to natural resources

Part V: Final Provisions (Articles 26-31)

Cover signature, ratification, entry into force, amendments, and authentic texts.

Nature of State Obligations

Progressive Realization
Unlike the immediate obligations in the ICCPR, the ICESCR recognizes
progressive realization of rights:

States must take steps to achieve full realization over time

Using maximum available resources

No justification for indefinite deferral

International Bills of Human Rights 10

 Non-retrogression principle - states cannot deliberately move backwards

Core Obligations
Despite progressive realization, states have immediate core obligations:

Ensure minimum essential levels of each right

Non-discrimination in access to rights

Take deliberate and concrete steps toward full realization

Implementation and Monitoring Mechanisms

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Established in 1985 by ECOSOC Resolution 1985/17:

18 independent experts serving 4-year terms

Reviews state reports every 5 years

Issues General Comments interpreting covenant provisions

Conducts constructive dialogue with states

Optional Protocol (2008)

Provides individual complaint mechanism:

Allows individuals to petition the Committee

Requires exhaustion of domestic remedies

Strengthens accountability for ICESCR violations

Significance and Impact

Legal Development
Established economic, social, and cultural rights as legally binding human
rights

Influenced national constitutions worldwide

Contributed to development of international human rights law

Recognized indivisibility and interdependence of all human rights

International Bills of Human Rights 11

 Contemporary Relevance
The ICESCR remains highly relevant for:

Sustainable Development Goals implementation

Addressing inequality and poverty

Climate change and environmental protection

Digital rights and technological advancement

Global health challenges including pandemics

Challenges and Criticisms

Vague formulations of some rights make implementation difficult

Resource constraints limit progressive realization

Weak enforcement mechanisms compared to civil and political rights

Cultural relativism debates over universal applicability

Justiciability questions about enforcing economic and social rights in

courts

Relationship with Other Human Rights Instruments

International Bill of Human Rights
Forms part of the trilogy with:

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)

Specialized Treaties
Complemented by specific instruments addressing:

Racial discrimination (CERD, 1965)

Women's rights (CEDAW, 1979)

Children's rights (CRC, 1989)

Disability rights (CRPD, 2006)

Regional Systems

International Bills of Human Rights 12

 Influenced regional human rights instruments:

European Social Charter

Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights (Protocol

of San Salvador)

African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Current Status and Future Directions

Ratification Status
171 states parties as of 2024

Near-universal acceptance demonstrates global commitment

Some notable non-parties affect global implementation

Contemporary Challenges
Business and human rights obligations

Extraterritorial obligations of states

Climate change impacts on economic and social rights

Digital divide and access to technology

COVID-19 pandemic effects on social protection

Emerging Interpretations
The Committee's recent work addresses:

Right to water (implicit in Article 11)

Right to adequate housing and forced evictions

Sexual and reproductive rights

Rights of indigenous peoples

Environmental dimensions of human rights

4. Right to Self-Determination under

International Human Rights Law

International Bills of Human Rights 13

 Origin and Historical Development
Early Political Origins (18th-19th Century)
The concept of self-determination has deep political roots dating back to:

Declaration of Independence (1776): Proclaimed that governments derive

"their just powers from the consent of the governed"

French Revolution: Established doctrine of popular sovereignty and

renunciation of wars of conquest

19th Century Nationalism: The "principle of nationalities" - each nation had

the right to constitute an independent state

Emergence as International Legal Principle

World War I Era

Fourteen Points of Wilson (1918): Championed self-determination as basis
for peace negotiations

Paris Peace Treaties: Limited realization through plebiscites in disputed

areas

League of Nations: Self-determination remained a political rather than

legal concept

Åland Islands Case (1921): Commission characterized self-determination

as "a principle expressed by a vague and general formula"

World War II and UN Charter

Atlantic Charter (1941): Proclaimed right of peoples to "choose the form of
government under which they will live"

UN Charter (1945): First legal incorporation of self-determination

Article 1(2): Develop friendly relations "based on respect for the

principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples"

Article 55: Economic and social cooperation based on self-

determination

Articles 73-76: Implicit references regarding non-self-governing

territories

International Bills of Human Rights 14

 Development through UN Practice
Decolonization Era (1960s)

Declaration on Granting Independence (1960)

UNGA Resolution 1514 (XV): First comprehensive statement of self-
determination as right

Proclaimed all peoples have right to self-determination

Called for immediate transfer of powers to colonial territories

Resolution 1541 (XV): Elaborated principles for determining non-self-

governing territories

International Covenants (1966)

Common Article 1 of ICCPR and ICESCR:

"All peoples have the right to self-determination"

Right to "freely determine their political status"

Right to "pursue their economic, social and cultural development"

Right to "freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources"

Friendly Relations Declaration (1970)

UNGA Resolution 2625 (XXV): Most authoritative formulation of self-
determination

Established three modes of implementation:

Establishment of sovereign independent state

Free association with independent state

Integration with independent state

Any other political status freely determined

Legal Status and Characteristics

Nature of the Right
Self-determination exhibits four key characteristics:

International Bills of Human Rights 15

 1. Dynamic Evolution
Transformed from political principle to binding legal right

Evolved from external (independence) to internal dimensions

Expanded from colonial peoples to all peoples, including indigenous

peoples

2. Multifaceted Application
Not synonymous with independence or secession

General principle requiring respect for "freely expressed will of peoples"

Specific rules for different situations (colonial, occupied, indigenous)

3. Relational Nature
Concerns relationships between peoples and states/other entities

Addresses situations of "alien subjugation, domination and exploitation"

Creates correlative obligations for duty-bearers

4. Remedial Character
Provides redress for ongoing domination and exploitation

Continuous process - one exercise doesn't exhaust the right

Adapts to new situations requiring remedy

Contemporary Legal Framework

International and External Self-Determination

Colonial Context
Firmly established for colonized peoples

Right to independence through free expression of will

Protected by prohibition of use of force against colonial peoples

Guided by uti possidetis principle (maintaining colonial boundaries)

Post-Colonial Applications

International Bills of Human Rights 16

 Palestinian people: ICJ confirmed right to self-determination

Occupied territories: Recognized in East Timor, Western Sahara cases

Peoples under alien domination: Extended beyond traditional colonialism

Internal Self-Determination

Core Elements
Right to democratic governance and political participation

Equitable representation in legislative, executive, and judicial institutions

Right to choose political and economic systems

Cultural and linguistic rights

Autonomy arrangements within existing states

Constitutional Implementation
Examples from comparative practice:
Ethiopia (1995):

Article 39: Unconditional right to self-determination including secession

Defines peoples by common culture, language, territory

Ethnic federalism based on self-determination

Mexico (1917):

Article 2: Indigenous peoples' right to self-determination "within

constitutional framework"

Specific autonomy rights including legal systems, cultural preservation,

land rights

Canada:

22+ self-government agreements with indigenous peoples

Recognition of "inherent right to self-government"

Implementation through various autonomy arrangements

Greenland-Denmark:

Self-Government Act (2008): Recognition of Greenlandic people's right to

self-determination

International Bills of Human Rights 17

 Progressive autonomy within Danish constitutional framework

Jurisprudential Development
International Court of Justice

Key Cases and Advisory Opinions

Namibia Advisory Opinion (1971):

Confirmed self-determination as legal foundation for decolonization

Established applicability to trust and non-self-governing territories

Western Sahara Advisory Opinion (1975):

Right of population to freely determine political status

Emphasized importance of free expression of will

Demonstrated complexities of determining "who constitutes the people"

East Timor Case (1995):

Self-determination has erga omnes character

All states have obligations regarding violations

Recognition of East Timorese people's right

Israeli Wall Advisory Opinion (2004):

First post-colonial application by ICJ

Palestinian people's right to self-determination

Erga omnes obligations:

Non-recognition of illegal situations

No aid or assistance to violations

Obligation to end impediments to self-determination

Key Legal Issues and Challenges

Definition of "Peoples"
No universally agreed definition in international law

Contextual determination: Often uncontested in specific cases

International Bills of Human Rights 18

 Distinguishing factors:

Colonial territories (territorial basis)

Indigenous peoples (ethnic/cultural basis)

Occupied populations (political basis)

Composition and Participation

"Who belongs to the people?" - Critical for referenda

Individual vs. collective rights nexus

Challenges from population movements and demographic changes

Examples: Western Sahara referendum disputes, Montenegro referendum

(2006)

Modes of Exercise
Preference for referenda in decolonization contexts

Various democratic processes acceptable

Continuing right - not exhausted by single exercise

Free, informed consent essential

Contemporary Developments and Challenges

Indigenous Peoples' Rights

UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)

Article 3: "Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination"

First widespread recognition that self-determination extends beyond

colonial peoples

Addresses historical exclusion from decolonization processes

Participation in International Law-Making

Theoretical Foundation (Natalie Jones' Framework):

Self-determination creates right to participate in international forums

Structural domination by international organizations and state collectives

International Bills of Human Rights 19

 Remedial obligation to enable meaningful participation

Current UN Process:

Indigenous peoples seeking enhanced status beyond NGO consultative

status

UN Resolution 70/232 (2015): Initiated consultation process

Ongoing negotiations for separate indigenous peoples' status

Internal Self-Determination Evolution

Democratic Governance Dimension

Emerging principle that state power requires legitimacy from people's will

International community's conditional recognition of new states

Requirements: democracy, human rights protection, rule of law

Federal and Autonomy Solutions

"Anti-secessionist cure": Internal self-determination as alternative to
secession

Examples:

Philippines: Autonomous regions for Muslim Mindanao

Bangladesh: Chittagong Hill Tracts Peace Accord

Bolivia: Indigenous autonomy within state unity

South Africa: Self-determination as associational right

Contemporary Challenges

Kosovo Precedent and Secession

2008 Declaration of Independence: Challenged territorial integrity
principle

ICJ Advisory Opinion (2010): Did not explicitly endorse self-determination

basis

High threshold for remedial secession:

Massive human rights violations

International Bills of Human Rights 20

 Government not representing whole people

Exhaustion of internal remedies

Minorities-within-Minorities
Complex intersectionality: Women, disabled persons, religious minorities
within ethnic groups

Constitutional safeguards: Bills of rights, human rights commissions

Hierarchy of rights: International human rights as limits on self-governing

authority

Erga Omnes Character and State Obligations

Nature of Obligations
Universal obligation not to recognize illegal situations

Duty not to assist in maintaining violations

Positive obligation to end impediments to self-determination

Interpretive principle for UN Charter and international law

Implementation Mechanisms
UN monitoring through specialized agencies and bodies

Regional organizations: OSCE, Council of Europe, African Union

International courts and tribunals

Civil society and peoples' organizations advocacy

Future Directions and Emerging Issues

Participation Rights
Right to participate in international law-making affecting peoples

Enhanced status in international organizations

Collective vs. individual participation rights balance

Environmental and Climate Dimensions

International Bills of Human Rights 21

 Traditional territories and climate change impacts

Indigenous knowledge in environmental governance

Resource rights and sustainable development

Digital Age Challenges

Cultural preservation in digital environments

Access to technology and digital rights

Online participation in governance processes

Global Governance Evolution

Supranational integration and shared sovereignty

Functional governance structures beyond state system

Multilevel governance and peoples' representation

Conclusion: Self-Determination as Living Principle

The right to self-determination continues to evolve as a dynamic, multifaceted,
relational, and remedial principle in international human rights law. From its
origins in 18th-century political philosophy through decolonization to
contemporary indigenous rights and global governance challenges, self-
determination remains a fundamental organizing principle of the international
legal order.
Key Insights:

Self-determination is not limited to independence but encompasses

various forms of autonomy and participation

Internal self-determination increasingly important as alternative to

secession

Peoples' participation in international law-making emerging as new

dimension

Remedial nature allows adaptation to new forms of domination and

exclusion

Constitutional implementation varies but requires meaningful autonomy

and representation

International Bills of Human Rights 22

 The principle's flexibility and adaptability ensure its continued relevance in
addressing emerging challenges to peoples' dignity, autonomy, and self-
governance in an increasingly interconnected world.

International Bills of Human Rights 23