Fa1f-Lecture Notes Fa1f Eng
Fa1f-Lecture Notes Fa1f Eng
ENGLISH – I
UNIT – I (PROSE)
LAW AND LANGUAGE
Unit I: ADVICE TO A YOUNGMAN INTERESTED IN GOING INTO LAW
- Felix Frankfurter
Introduction
Felix Frankfurter was born in Vienna, Austria, on Nov. 15, 1882. At the age of 12 he
and his six brothers and sisters were taken to the United States. Following graduation from
the College of the City of New York in 1902, Frankfurter entered Harvard Law School. He
became editor of the Harvard Law Review and earned his degree in 1906 with honors. Henry
Stimson, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, appointed Frankfurter an
assistant in 1906. When President William Howard Taft named Stimson secretary of war in
1911, Stimson took Frankfurter along as law officer of the Bureau of Insular Affairs.
Frankfurter was made a Supreme Court justice in 1939. As he had no children, he adopted
three English refugee children.
1
CLC/AM/R/05
Felix is expressing that, for a lawyer, he must develop his imaginative faculties by
reading poetry, seeing great paintings and listening to music. By doing the above-mentioned
things, one may get peace of mind, clear mindset and can do well in his duties.
Conclusion
He finally says that, he must read a lot and deposit that knowledge in his mind for the
future. By learning the mysterious of this universe, he can widen and deepen his feelings. If
he (Paul) follows the words of Felix, he may forget all about his future career, because, the
above things are the foundation for starting the good career.
Scientific English”, “Writing Prose”, “Writing Poetry”, and “Writing Plays”. But there is no
book available on the title “Writing Legal English”.
Length of Laws
The length of the law is also criticized by Lavery. The law is written in a very
decorative language and the length is also difficult to follow. H gives an example for this
from Constitution of the State of New York, Article- 8, and section- 10. This section’s first
line alone has 462 words. He feels that this first line is longer than the 10 Commandments of
Christianity.
Length of The Modern Law
The same style is being continued in the modern law also. For instance, the modern
law book of Foster, “Federal Practice” is having 352 words in a sentence. That sentence is
having 15 -16 main verbs and many phrases and clauses. Bentham, a famous law reformer
has written some books Law. His early books have been very simple and the later books
become unreadable. The only reason behind this is the language.
Usage of Jargons
It is criticized that the Lawyers are using more ‘jargons’ in their written documents. The
Cambridge Professor Arthur Quiller feels that this should be avoided. Because that can be
understood by the Justices and Lawyers but the laymen cannot understand the meaning. He
pointed out the two vices of Jargons.
They are,
1. They go round the things and not straight to the points.
2. Such usages are very vague and abstract.
Conclusion
Finally Lavery criticizes the faulty grammar of the lawyers in their documents. He has told
that, the Lawyers consult 100 Law books to prepare a legal document but not even a single
grammar book. He concludes the prose work by saying that, the legal writing of the Lawyers
should be clear and error free which should be understandable for all people including
common man.
THE LANGUAGE OF THE LAW
-Urban A. Lavery
Urban A. Lavery, in his essay “The Language of the Law” deals with the trifling facts
of a lawyer’s language. The ability of the lawyer to confuse others has been the subject of
3
CLC/AM/R/05
proverbs. Nevertheless, the author says that it is not the purpose of this paper to praise the
linguistic brilliance of the lawyer, but to consider some of his defects.
The author throws light on the general decline in the standards of legal writing. A
lawyer who speaks the Kings English better than other seems to lose his mastery when it
comes to writing. It is a difficult task to teach others the art of writing. There are books on
writing subjects like poetry, prose, scientific English, but none on writing legal English.
Laws are so abundant and common that they must be understood and obeyed by all
sections of the people. Ignorance of law excuses no man. Therefore laws must be drafted in
such a way that the language is simple and easily understandable to layman as well as
lawyers.
The sentence is the basic unit expression. As a general rule sentences should be short
because short sentences are more quickly and easily understood than long sentences. A
sentence, containing not more than fifteen words is called a short sentence. It is sad to note
that lawyers seldom look into grammar or composition books. They do not consider the use
of proper adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions etc., and the author even criticizes Jeremy
Bentham the greatest law reformer in England whose later writing’s became difficult to
read.
Another chief defect in the writing of lawyers is the fact that they use circumlocution
rather than straight blunt speech. They prefer to go round a subject with their words rather
than straight to it. Considering the complexities of the subject, it may be admitted that the
lawyer’s problem in writing is a difficult one. But the fact remains that they do not give due
attention to the art of writing. What is well spoken may not look nice when put into writing.
It is just the difference between oral and written words which makes that dictated brief
horrible. Such a document fails to realize the technique which lies in the art of writing legal
English. It is a technique which can only be acquired by persistent effort and it does not
come with the profession as many lawyers think.
IN THE COURT
- Anton Chekhov
Introduction
In the court was first published in 1886. The story relates to Chekhov’s experiences
from 1884- 1886, when he worked as a substitute country doctor in Zvenigorod. Chekov saw
patients, conducted autopsies, and testified in courts as an expert witness. A lawyer by the
name serpovsky wrote that Chekhov was keenly interested in the court proceedings and was
very well acquainted with the judicial procedures. Leo Tolstoy considered this story to be
one of the best that Chekhov wrote and called it “a true pearl.”
4
CLC/AM/R/05
The story is a satire on the Russian judiciary. Chekhov, as is true to his style, does not
give a realistic portrayal of the court proceedings. His aim through the story is to criticize the
incompetencies of the Russian judiciary. A system that fails in all aspects of serving justice.
His major tool in doing so is satire.
Case of Nikolay Harlamov
The case is that of a peasant called Nikolay Harlamov, who has been accused of
murdering his wife, on the evening of the ninth of June. She was found in the porch with her
broken skull lying in a pool of blood and an axe beside her. She had been spotted by her
neighbours and when they went to inform Nikolay about the calamity, he wasn’t to be
spotted anywhere. He in fact had disappeared and two days later, came on his own accord to
the police office, looking pale, in torn clothes, trembling all over. He was then put in a lock
up.
Description of the Court
Chekhov wants to highlight the apathy shown by the officials of the circuit court. He
starts the narrative, setting the background for the reader, wherein he brings out the general
dull appearance of the court even on a bright spring day. On clear moonlight nights, Chekhov
says that the court stood like an oppressive mass of stone above the modest landscape and
little dwelling houses which seemed plunged in quiet slumber.
The case was heard on a dull autumn day, where the court was described as an
unattractive bam coupled with the looks of a dismal barrack like appearance with dingy
windows and cinnamon colored filthy perspiring walls, noisy due to the whirring of the
ventilation wheels, in other words the noise of fan was deafening. All these accentuated the
unattractive state of the circuit court. The disgusting odour of fumigating candles gives the
reader a feeling that it must have been suffocating inside. Further Chekhov mentions that it
had no comforts internally or externally.
What added to the gloom of the court was the proceedings conducted by the most
disinterested officials, where the service is described as a church service without a choir. The
officials could not be bothered about the misfortunes, the truth, the lies spoken inside the
courtroom. It spilled over to Nikolay Harlamov’s case too, which came up for hearing at two
o’clock in the afternoon. The officials could not care less that a murder case had to be heard
and a man’s life was at stake. A man, who had been accused of murdering his wife, who had
denied the charges and was supported by his neighbours who testified that the man in
question, Nikolay Harlamov had been good to his wife, except perhaps when he was in an
inebriated state.
Evidences of the Case
The material evidences like the full-skirted coat, the sleeve which had dark brown
stain of blood, axe ect. were examined. Harlamov denied that the brown coloured stain was
5
CLC/AM/R/05
possibly his wife’s blood. When the question of the possession of an axe arouse, he first
denied that he had an axe; then he claimed that he did have a smaller one but was lost by his
son Prohor, two years before Prohor joined the army.
The Trial Process
During the entire prosecution process, all the officials were unmistakably detached
and showed no emotion. The officials included the secretary, who read the case in a
monotonous, bored voice, rapidly like a sacristan or a church officer, the president who was
more worried about his comforts and took a deep interest in the clothes of other members, the
Assistant Prosecutor who sat motionless as a statue, busy reading with full attention Bryon’s
Cain, lifting his head occasionally. Compounding the narcotic and still character of the
courtroom was the expression of the counsel for Harlamov, who had boredom written on his
face, an expression which is seen on the faces of school boys and men on duty, who are
forced from day to day to sit in the same place and see the same faces and walls everyday.
What added to the woes of the accused was the doctor’s tawdry investigation, where all the
possible witnesses had not been examined such as the accused’s brother or the elders of the
village; neither was the mental state of the accused examined. All they were interested was to
get done with the prosecution and wind up with the case as soon as possible.
Intially Harlamov looked with dull witted respectfulness at the judges uniforms at the
weary faces of the jurymen and blinked calmly thinking that would be given a proper
hearing. Later as the hearing proceeded, he was irritated that he was not properly heard.
When the trail came to a close and the prisoner was escorted back it was a painful moment,
which was felt by the audience too. Chekhov leaves it to the audience to draw their own
conclusion about the case, as he ends the case without the judgement being pronounced.
Conclusion
Chekhov’s objective is to bring out the boredom and apathy among the court officials
that was seen in Russian courts back then. That a man’s life was at stake did not emotionally
move them to their job diligently and sincerely. He presents this story in the most satirical
way to an audience that includes thinking readers who can very well empathize with the
accused and realise the importance of an efficient and accountable judiciary system.
IN THE COURT
- Anton Chekhov
“In the court’’ is a very vivid description of the trial of a peasant named Nikolay
Harlamov, charged with the murder of his wife. The author Anton Chekhov, at the outset,
gives a picture of the circuit court at the district town where the Justices of the peace, the
Rural Board, the Liquor Board, the Military Board and many others sat by turns. The
building is a very old one and it bears a dismal appearance without any kind of comfort.
6
CLC/AM/R/05
The sitting of the circuit court began between nine and ten. The cases came on one
after the other and ended quickly like a church service without a choir. At precisely two o’
clock the presiding officer announced that the case of Nikolay Harlamov could next be
heard. Harlamov, the prisoner, tall, thick-set peasant of about fifty five years was brought in.
The presiding officer, the assistant prosecutor, the counsel for the defense and all the
officials of the court wore a monotonous look in their routine work. No one seemed to have
any special interest in his particular case.
At this stage the author reveals the mental make-up of the prisoner who for the first
time got into the clutches of law. He looked with dull-witted respectfulness at the judges
uniforms and blinked calmly. The charge of murder hung over him and yet here he met with
neither threatening faces nor indignant looks. He did not understand that the men in the
court were accustomed to the dramas and tragedies of life.
In the meantime, after the customary questions to the prisoner, the charge against the
prisoner was read. The charge was that he murdered his wife on the evening of ninth June.
The presiding officer asked him whether he pleaded guilty. When the prisoner denied the
charge, the trial began. The court proceeded with the examination of witnesses. Two peasant
women, five men and the village policeman, who had made the inquiry, were examined. All
of them testified that Harlamov lived well with his wife. On the particular day the body of
the woman was found in the porch with her skull broken. An axe also lay beside her in a
pool of blood. Harlamov had disappeared and came to the police station after two days.
When asked by the president Harlamov told that he was wandering about the fields on
those two days as he was afraid that he might be judged guilty. The district doctor was also
examined. When the defense counsel tried to get an answer to his question from the doctor,
regarding the mental condition of the criminal, he could not get it. Then the material
evidences like the cloth, axe etc., were examined. Harlamov denied that he had an axe and
also he gave different reason for the blood stain in his coat. Harlamov was irritated that he
was not properly heard. The trail came to a close and the prisoner was escorted back and it
was a painful moment. The author ends the description without giving the judgment
pronounced.
Anton Chekov presents this story in the most satirical way that indulges readers to
think and empathize with the accused and realize the importance of an efficient and
accountable judiciary system. This Story is an attempt to bring out the boredom and
indifference peculiar to criminal trials. The attitude of a poor villager charged with a grave
offence is well described.
7
CLC/AM/R/05
Erwin N. Griswold in his essay “Educating Lawyers for a changing world” underlines
the need for change in the legal education to keep pace with the changes in the society. He
says stress on research in law as in other subjects of study.
Legal education in our country is only about eighty years old. During this period there
have been many changes and developments in the law schools and law teaching. These
changes reflect not merely growth and development in our law and society, but also, a
marked change in the legal profession. In the recent decades, the traditional role of a lawyer
has changed and his functional area has considerably expanded to business counseling,
public service labour law, administrative law, taxation etc. As a result of this, effective
teaching in these subjects is necessary to equip the lawyers to meet the challenges of the
profession.
Much of our legislation is piecemeal and for the most part drafted by part time
legislators with little or very limited opportunities for detailed discussion ‘The re-
examination and analysis of these laws has been a major task which practicing lawyers
cannot effectively do. This is an area where the law schools can make a major contribution.
The challenge put to the law schools in our times is that in addition to being effective
teaching agencies, they must become centers for carrying on research into the law, its
development and its application to the solution of current problems. Much of the legal
research of the past has become inadequate in view of the modern development in law.
Therefore, serious attempts must be made in the field of legal research. The research
activities contribute directly to the teaching. The findings of the research become available
for teaching. The students can often engage directly, in the research activities.
The importance given to research in subjects like medicine, engineering etc. is not
given to law. Natural science deals with phenomena that are measurable with accuracy.
Experiments are simple and can be conducted in a short interval of time, whereas, the
problems of the social science the adjustment of human relations in society are more
complex. Yet the problems are more important to mankind than anything related to natural
science. The basic problem confronting the society is whether it will be able to control the
forces that science has developed. This involves baffling questions relating to human nature,
Psychology, economics, political science law and other fields also. We have begun to
explore these areas, but the results are not encouraging. Still in certain areas we have made
progress.
We cannot predict the manner in which developments may take place in the future. We
must be prepared to face the challenges thrown by them. We cannot make progress in the
field of adjusting human relations unless we work at it intensively.
MR. HAVLENA’S VERDICT
- Karel Capek
8
CLC/AM/R/05
9
CLC/AM/R/05
- Arthur T. Vanderbilt
Lawyers in the modern society have multifarious roles to play According to Arthur T.
Vanderbilt, there are five important functions assigned to a great lawyer. They are
1. Counseling
2. Skill in advocacy
3. Improving the profession
4. Leading public opinion and
5. Accepting public office when called for.
First of all a truly great lawyer is a wise counselor to men in their crises. A lawyer
must possess a sound knowledge of the principles of law to render effective counseling. A
lawyer must also have a wide and deep knowledge of human nature and of modern society.
Secondly a lawyer must be skilled in the art of advocacy and well-trained in defending
the legal rights of his clients both in the trial courts and on appeal. A lawyer must be well-
experienced so that he can defend the cause of his client and help the court in setting the
course of law. Advocacy is not the gift of god it involves general distinct arts which must be
studied and mastered. Constant reading and assimilation of facts and modern trends in the
field of law will go a long way helping a lawyer to develop the skill of advocacy.
The third task of a lawyer is to improve his profession individually and as a member of
the organized Bar. Every man is under an obligation to build up the profession to which he
belongs. Indeed, this obligation is exactly what distinguishes a profession from business.
The advances in natural science and technology and the changes in business and in social
life are so startling that a lawyer must improve his profession to keep pace with them. The
law schools also must come forward to perform their task in equipping the young lawyers to
face the challenges of the profession.
The fourth function of a lawyer is to act an intelligent and unselfish leader of public
opinion. Sound public opinion is so indispensable that it can even change the course of
history. The author cites an example from Charles Lindbergh’s warning about the war
planes in Germany, over six months before the outbreak of wood war II. If the news of
Charles Lindbergh had been supported by strong public opinion, the course of history would
have been different.
In view of the deteriorating standards in public life the author makes very strong plea
for the lawyers to take up public office whenever there is a call. The professional thoughts
and brilliance of a lawyer should not end in his own private clients. A lawyer with his
10
CLC/AM/R/05
profound knowledge in human relations and social conditions can easily solve many of the
problems of the day.
These are the five important functions of a great lawyer. Education in these five
functions of the lawyer is partly the province of the college, partly the duty of the law
school, but in large measure it is the responsibility of the individual lawyer. The institutions
imparting legal education have realized their responsibilities and started planning the
curriculum accordingly.
COMPARATIVE LAW
- Rene David and John E.C. Brierley
The emergence of comparative law as an important subject of study is relatively
recent. Only from the second half of the 19th Century comparative law became an important
branch of study. The need for comparing laws slowly became more and more apparent.
Hearing, a German jurist proclaimed that it was the method of future jurist.
In many countries of the world, especially in France, the importance of comparative
Law came to be stressed in the early part of the 19th century. Comparative law under the
modest title of comparative legislation appeared at this time. France, which was following
Napoleonic codes for a Long time began to accept suggestions for improvement in
legislation. An “Office of Foreign legislation” to inform judges about foreign laws were
created in the year 1869.This simplified the comparison of laws by publishing translations
of foreign codes. This first international congress of comparative law was held in Paris in
1900. The principle idea that emerged from the discussion was the creation of a droit
common legislative, (Common Law) the law of the 20th century shared by all civilized
humanity The legislations of the different nations acting together by means of international
treaties were to promulgate the common law and make it the positive law of their countries
During, the period between 1918 and 1945 some attempts were made to promulgate
common law of all countries. But the growth in this area was hampered to some extent by
the international political climate prevailing then. However, a new thrust was given to the
development of comparative law after World War II. Technical discoveries profoundly
changed the conditions of life. Distances disappeared and national boundaries to a great
extent ceased to have any meaning. The economic and social developments and the impact
of globalization and liberalization in the present context have necessitated a fresh look at
law and legislation at the international level. The jurist cannot be blind to the new balance of
power which has been established in world polities & economics. The result is that the study
of law in the contemporary world has become international.
The uses of comparative law
1. Unification of Laws
11
CLC/AM/R/05
The idea of world unification of law through legislative agreements has become
relevant and very useful in new area such as space law atomic law, television law, maritime
law etc., where there is no rooted tradition. However, in other fields such as commercial law
also, uniformity is desired in the context of the different regional agreements throughout the
world, juristic efforts are on to verify the laws by means of legislation.
2. International understanding
Comparative law promotes international understanding of the basic principles of law
and the legislation. This ensures harmonious co -existence which is the condition precedent
for the preservation and progress of any nation. The world today is different from what it
was a century ago. The position of Western Europe and the thinking of the jurist’s Roman
tradition are not fully endorsed. International political and commercial relation must take
into account these new circumstances.
3. Better knowledge of national law :
Apart from unification and the other uses, comparative law has a new function. It
helps us to know; to understand and to probe our own legal system. It also helps us to show
how some questions can be more relevantly asked and how certain parts of our law are not
properly drafted. Judicial nationalism is provincialism and irreconcilable with the
development and even the application of a national law.
Thus, it has become imperative that Legal education must have its focus, on foreign
thought and experience so as broaden the outlook of the jurists.
THE HYPOTHESES OF FAILURE
- O. Henry
Introduction
This is a short story written by the American writer, O’ Henry. There are five
characters namely Lawyer Gooch, his assistant, Archibald, Mr. and Mrs. Billings and Henry
K. Jessup. The main theme is about the bungling and finally losing a case by lawyer Gooch
due to mistaking the identity of his clients. It probably has an underlying message that
lawyers first understand and estimate their clients to be a successful lawyer.
Ideals of Lawyer Gooch
Lawyer Gooch, despite being a divorce lawyer is portrayed as a conservative person
believing in the sanctity of marriage. When estranged couples approach him, he would try
his best to reunite them instead of breaking the marriage. At times he would train the
children to pull them together. Out of gratitude for saving their marriage, the rejoined couple
would pay the lawyer a fat fee. After few months due to differences cropping up again, the
12
CLC/AM/R/05
same couple would come back seeking a divorce, for which they have to pay his fee. In this
way, the lawyer gets paid twice for one case.
Description of the Office and the Clients
Lawyer Gooch has constructed his office like the bottom of a ship, each compartment
being water-tight. There are three rooms in his office in a row, connected to the central room
and the hallway. This is to ensure that clients do not mingle. The month of June is considred
to be a lean season for divorce lawyers as it is the month of Cupid, the god of love and
hymen, the goddess of marriage. One day in June, the lawyer was sitting in his office room
least expecting a client. A knock was heard on the outermost door and when Archibald
opened it, a visitor pushed him aside and entered the lawyer’s room. Before lawyer Gooch
could react the stranger who looked bold and arrogant asked the lawyer whether he was
Phineas C.Gooch. Offering the lawyer a cigar, the man stated a hypothetical case and
wanted the lawyer’s honest comments. He refused to reveal his name, despite the lawyer
asking him.
In a small town called Susanville, Mr. and Mrs. Billings lived. He was a businessman
who gave importance to earning money. The lady was more inclined towards academics and
enjoyed attending meetings, speaking about scientific developments, reading poetry etc.
They were not made for each other and there was no love lost between them. In such a
situation, Henry K. Jessup, a real estate agent came to Susanville to do some business. Mrs.
Billings falls in love with him and starts openly proclaiming her love. Startled by this,
Jessup leaves Susanville, but she leaves her home and follows him. The first client finishes
the hypothetical and asks the lawyer to get a divorce for that lady so that she can marry
Jessup. He assures the lawyer that Jessup will definitely take care of her once she gets her
divorce. He agrees to pay 500 dollars towards that. Before the lawyer could reply, Archibald
announces the arrival of a lady. Taking the first client to the adjoining room, he excuses
himself saying he has to write a will to a lady and that he will come back on finishing that.
Latching the door from outside the lawyer tells Archibald to send that lady.
A very good looking, well dressed lady with flowing robes and accessories is
welcomed by the lawyer. She also states the same hypothetical case. It is clear to the lawyer
that she is Mrs. Billings. Instead of coming to the point, she beats round the bush, irritating
the lawyer. When prodded to come to the point, the lady asks whether she can get a divorce
for 340 dollars, for her friend got one for that amount. Before the lawyer could discuss the
matter, Archibald announces the arrival of a client. Lawyer Gooch takes that lady to the
other empty room, and asks her to write a will for an old man. Coming to the middle office
room, he permits the third client to enter.
Client number three is a very irritated looking man, who seems to be having some
problem. Though he was wearing good quality clothes, it looked like he had travelled a lot
and seemed to be tired and worn out. He too without revealing his identity presented the
same hypothetical case. He looked disturbed and pleaded with the lawyer to see that the lady
13
CLC/AM/R/05
unites with her husband since only he knows how to handle her. He promised to pay one
thousand dollars to the lawyer that day she returned to her husband, who he claimed was
waiting for her.
Master plan of Lawyer Gooch – A Failure
This was a situation that pleased lawyer Gooch. He realized that all the three related
people in the hypothetical were with him and he was the master of their destinies. Asking
Archibald to close the outer door and not allow anyone, he enters the room where the first
client is waiting, to get the best deal. He demands a fee of 1500 dollars, which the first client
refuses to pay and he exits through the hall way without being able to see the other clients.
The lawyer now goes to the third client to clinch the deal. He assures the client that he will
definitely bring together the Billings couple and assuming him to be Mr. Billings, he
dramatically reveals the presence of Mrs. Billings in the adjoining room. On hearing that,
the startled third client gets up from his chair, runs to the open window and from the second
floor attempts to jump down. The shocked lawyer pleads with him to come back to his wife,
assuming him to be Mr. Billings and runs towards the window. Throwing the bag in his
hand, the client jumps down. It hits the lawyer on his face, who staggers back. The contents
of the bag spill out and it comes out that the man was not her husband as wrongly assumed
by the lawyer. The husband was asking for a divorce to his wife so she can marry Jessup,
while Jessup was willing to pay 1000 dollars so that the lady remains with her husband. So
both the men did not want the lady and were trying to pass her to the other.
Conclusion
Lawyer Gooch decided not to take up that case, asked Archibald to send her off by
telling her that Sir was gone to the Supreme Court. Thus due to wrong assumption made by
the lawyer, the case went out of his hand.
THE HYPOTHESES OF FAILURE
- O. Henry
“The Hypotheses of failure” deals with the way a lawyer handles clients with
conflicting interests. Lawyer Gooch a leading practitioner mainly on matrimonial disputes
was fond of comparing his suite of office rooms with the bottom of a ship. Just as the water
tight compartments in the bottom of a ship, there were separate rooms for clients in his
office. When he was occupied with a client, if another client with a conflicting interest
called on him, he would be accommodated in another room with the help of the office boy.
Both the clients would not be allowed to meet each other. This way lawyer Gooch, a man of
humour used to settle disputes and to get huge amount as fees.
One day, in the ninth of June, when Gooch was sitting in his office almost idle, a man
called on him. He looked a bit arrogant and did introduce himself. He started asking many
questions about Gooch and wanted to state a hypothetical case. The case was that a fine-
14
CLC/AM/R/05
looking woman, wife of Thomas R. Billings ran away with Henry K. Jessup; a licentious
man. He asked Gooch whether a married woman, well educated in science and culture can
take the man she likes, when the matrimonial home becomes incompatible. Gooch answered
in the affirmative and agreed to get her divorce and the man agreed to pay fees of five
hundred dollars.
While the conversation was still on, a lady client called on Gooch and she was led into
a separate room. Gooch kept his first client waiting and entertained client number two, a tall
lady with wealthy appearance. She also wanted to state a hypothetical case and get divorce
for the woman. The facts of the case were the same as already stated by the first client.
At this stage the third client, a gentleman called on Gooch and he was also kept in a
separate room. He looked nervous and much worried. He also narrated a hypothetical case
the pathetic plight of a husband whose wife ran after another man, wrecking a matrimonial
home. The facts were the same but he did not want divorce for the woman, instead he
pleaded with Gooch to act as a mediator and reunite the estranged husband and wife. He
promised one thousand dollars as fee for the settlement.
Lawyer Gooch knew very well that the three individuals sitting in separate rooms were
the real parties in the hypothetical case, though they were not conscious of one another’s
presence within his reach. Gooch kept me third client waiting and went back to his first
client and demanded one thousand and five hundred dollars as fee for getting divorce. When
he refused to pay the amount he was shown the way out. Gooch is now hopeful of bringing
about a settlement between the husband and wife with the third party out of the scene.
Gooch tried to bring them together, but he could not succeed. The third client Mr. Billings,
on seeing his wife Mrs. Billings ran down the building through the open window without
even stopping to take his bag and hat. Mr. Billings also left the office in anger.
Thus the tricks of lawyer Gooch misfired and the good ship of his business wrecked.
THE MIND AND FAITH OF JUSTICE HOLMES
-Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
Justice Holmes analyses the different theories of punishment and concludes that the
‘Retributive Theory of punishment is still relevant despite the emergence of the other
modern theories. Satisfaction of the desire for vengeance continues to be one of the objects
of punishment. Where compensation to the victim is not possible, by reason of the
impossibility of estimating the worth of the suffering in terms of money is to the property of
the Criminal it may be said that one of its objects is to gratify the desire for vengeance. The
prisoner pays with his body. Sir James Stephen says “The Criminal law stands to the passion
of revenge in much the same relation as marriage to the sexual appetite”.
15
CLC/AM/R/05
However, the retributive -theory has been criticized on the ground that it does not
attach any purpose to punishment. According to the theory, punishment is an end in itself.
The theory does not care for the Criminal and so has no social content.
Justice Holmes has taken into account the merits of the other theories, such as the
preventive theory and the Reformative theory. The Preventive theory says that punishment
should be a means to an end. Therefore, prevention of Crime must be the end in punishing a
criminal Hegel, one of the exponents of this theory says that punishment must be equal in
the sense that it must be proportionate to the crime, because its only purpose is to prevent it.
It is objected that, the preventive theory is immoral because it does not furnish any measure
of punishment except the law giver’s subjective opinion in regard to the sufficiency of the
amount of punishment. In spite of all this, the preventive theory is accepted as a modern
theory
The Reformative theory of punishment is considered as the most modern one.
According to this theory, the purpose of punishment is to reform the criminal. This theory
advocates human approach towards the criminal to, reform him and to make him conform to
the social pattern. But Justice Holmes does not agree with this theory. He says that
according to this theory no criminal can be punished.
Justice Holmes maintains that there is an affirmative argument in favour of the theory
of retribution. The fitness of punishment following wrong doing is recognised by the
exponents of all theories. The feelings of fitness is in fact vengeance in disguise. Therefore
vengeance is an element though not the chief element of punishment. Neither of these
theories can be strictly applied in certain cases. For Example, self- Preference or the right of
private defense is recognized by criminal law administration in general. In this case a man
cannot be punished for talking the life of another man. On the other hand there is a doctrine
which says that Ignorance of law is no excuse for breaking it. Here, one can be punished for
doing an act without learning that it was violation of law.
Therefore, it follows that any theory of punishment must be based on a perfect
balancing of the competing and conflicting interests in the society, which lies in the people
interest and the public interest.
A PLEA FOR THE SEVEREST PENALTY UPON HIS CONVICTION FOR
SEDITION
- Mahatma Gandhi
Mahatma Gandhi was tried ‘or several political offences in India. In 1922 he was
arrested and charged with sedition for three of his articles in his magazine ‘Young India’. At
the conclusion of the trail Gandhiji was asked by the judge if he wished to make statement
before receiving sentence Gandhiji expressed his willingness to make a statement entirely
endorsing the learned Advocate General’s remarks. He said that it had become a passion
16
CLC/AM/R/05
with him to preach disaffection towards the existing system of government. He added that it
was his painful duty to admit before the court that it started much earlier than his connection
with ‘Young India’. He knew that he was playing with fire still he reiterated that he would
do the same thing if he was set free.
Gandhiji had a very strong faith in Nonviolence. To quote him, “I wanted to avoid
violence; Nonviolence is the first article of my faith. It is also the last article of my creed”.
He admitted that the people sometimes had gone mad and turned violent, but he felt sorry
for it and submitted himself to the highest penalty provided by law.
Gandhiji read out his statement which described the circumstances that turned him an
uncompromising disaffectionist and non-co-operator. Gandhiji’s public began in 1893 in
South Africa in troubled weather. Soon he realized that he had no rights as a man because he
was an Indian. Yet he did not wish the destruction of the system of the government. He
extended his full co-operation whenever the existence of the empire was threatened. When
the world war broke out in 1914, he stood by one British Empire and was acknowledged as
a true loyalist. In all his services to the Empire, he was actuated by the belief that it was
possible to gain status of full equality in the Empire for the Indian’s.
All his hopes were shattered by the Rowlatt Act of 1919, a law designed to rob the
people of all freedom. Gandhiji led a series of agitations against it. Then it was followed by
the Punjab horrors beginning with the massacre at Jalianwala Bagh. The British
administration became oppressive and the Indian’s were, subjected to public flogging and
humiliations of all sorts.
The British administration, through various measures fully exploited the masses. With
the result, India became poor and helpless with little power of resting famines. In ninety-
nine cases out a hundred, justice was denied to Indians as against Europeans in the courts of
India. Section 124-A of the Indian penal code was designed to suppress the liberty of the
citizen. Gandhiji told that he has no disaffection or ill-will against any single administrator
or against the king’s persons. But he was justified in being disaffected towards a
government which had done more harm to India than any previous system.
For the reasons stated above Gandhiji was of the opinion that non co-operation with
evil is as much a duty as co-operation with good. He admitted all the charges against him
and submitted cheerfully to the highest penalty that could be inflicted upon him by a law.
The statement of Mahatma Gandhi is one of the greatest treatises related to the chequered
history of the Indian freedom movement.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY CHARLESS RUSSELL OF PIGOTT BEFORE THE
PARNELL COMMISSION
- Sir Charles Russell
17
CLC/AM/R/05
Sir Charles Russel’s cross- examination of Pigott, was very dramatic and widely
acclaimed Pigott, was the chief witness in this case, which was an attack upon Charles
Parnell and sixty five Irish members of Parliament for belonging to a lawless and murderous
organization working for the overthrow of the rule in Ireland.
The cross-examination commenced with Sir Charles Russell asking Pigott to write
some words on a sheet of paper. The startled witness was forced to do what he was asked to
do. He wrote the word ‘hesitancy’ as ‘hesitency’. The committee was informed by Pat Egan,
an Irish politician that Pigott normally spelt the word wrongly, and so he suspected him to
have forged the letter. Pigott normally spelt wrongly, and so he suspected him to have forged
the letter. After the first round, Sir Charles Russell started intense rounds of questioning
about the publication of the articles, the date the content etc and Pigott’s knowledge about all
these. After Pigott gave the answers, Russel read a letter written by Pigott to the Archbishop
Walsh on 4th March 1887, 3 days prior to the publication of the letter by the Times. Pigott
said that he was not aware of the publication or the contents of the letter. But in his letter he
had written about the publication of certain statements hurting the prospects of Mr. Parnell
and his party men inviting criminal proceedings against them by the Government.
After every round of questioning, a part of Pigott’s letter was read out which clearly
revealed that he was lying. At the end of his battle, Russell was victorious, Pigott was beaten,
but he did not confess. His answers were nailed one after the other by Russell.
After Pigott’s cross-examination was finished he went to Paris without informing and
from there sent a letter confessing his guilt, admitting his perjury and giving the details of
how he had forged the letter by tracing words and phrases from genuine Parnell letters,
placed against the window pane and sold the forged letter for 605.
The confession was read and the commission declared it as a forgery. The Times
withdrew the letter and a warrant was issued for Pigott’s arrest on the charge of perjury. The
police went to his hotel in Madrid to arrest him. He went inside to collect his belongings and
committed suicide by shooting himself. The case served as a good example of how a skilful
cross-examiner can use a damaging letter to tear a dishonest witness’s defence to pieces and
expose his lies.
ON THE ENTIRELY REASONABLE MURDER OF A POLICE CONSTABLE
- George Bernard Shaw
George Bernard Shaw was asked to give his opinion on capital punishment with
reference to the murder of a police constable named Gutteridge. The murder was so
sensational that it was described as brutal and callous. The murder was committed in a
scientific manner. The Criminal in an encounter with the constable shot him dead. Knowing
that the last picture that was focused on the constable eye was that of him destroyed the two
eyes with two more shots. The criminal was a habitual offender. He was also sensitive and
19
CLC/AM/R/05
imaginative because only such people risk hanging to avoid penal servitude. The murder
gave no clue to him.
Bernard Shaw calls this the most reasonable murder and says that such crimes are very
dangerous. He says that such criminals threaten not only the police force but the whole body
of citizens whose only means is to call the police when confronted with the criminal.
The peculiarity of these murders has also’ an important bearing on the question of the
death penalty. According to Bernard Shaw the only excuse for capital punishment is that the
criminal gives more trouble to the community than he is worth. The state is justified in
taking away the life of a criminal only when the crime is so heinous that the repetition of
which cannot be even imagined of. The theories of retaliate punishment and expiatory
punishment are out-dated. If such theories are strictly applied we should spare some murders
and kill quite a number of intolerable nuisances whom we suffer in silence.
A criminal who shoots to escape detection as a matter of business is like a soldier. The
remedy in his case is to give up our cruel punishments and to give him a better chance for
the honest employment of his talents than what our present system offers. Shaw says that the
deterrent theory of punishment is only the judicial theory. He gives two objections to it. The
first is that no severity of punishment deters when detection is uncertain, as it must always
be. When pickpockets were hanged, pockets were picked under the gallows. Now that the
penalty is comparatively less severe, pockets are still picked, but never when a police man is
looking on. The second is that the deterrence theory leads to the conclusion that somebody
must be punished for every crime to deter others from committing it. Whether that
somebody has committed the crime or not is of no consequence. An innocent person also
may be punished.
For the reasons stated above Bernard Shaw pleads for a much liberal approach towards
criminals and punishment with a purpose and a human touch.
HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE IRISH FREE STATE
- LYNCH V. FITZGERALD AND OTHERS (1938) I.R. 382
The present prose work is a description of the case Lynch V. Fitzgerald & Others
which took place in Ireland’s High Court in 1938. A boy was killed by the detective service
agents repressing an attempt to disrupt a cattle sale in Cork. The trial took place in the court
of Justice Hanna.
It was described that the Sheriff of Cork seized number of Cattle under a warrant
from the Irish Land Commission and attempted to sell them with a force of about 200 Guards
with about 12 armed detectives was placed outside the yard, and 40 Guards including 10
ordinary detectives were placed inside the place of sale. The security was there in Marsh’s
Yard in Copley Street, Cork due to a threatened demonstration against the sale of cattle.
20
CLC/AM/R/05
Only the prospective buyers were there to take part in the sales as it was said that the
buyers and their representatives were only allowed in the yard. For some time before the hour
fixed for the sale, a large crowd of about 1500 people had collected in Anglesea Street which
was the main street into which Copley Street opened. By the time, a lorry filled with men
carrying sticks came through the crowd in Anglesea Street, turned into Copley Street. It was
driven against the several barriers of the Guards and crashed into the gates of the yard
breaking through it. After a few moments, the crowd outside the yard was held in check with
the exception of one or two, who succeeded in entering into the yard. Immediately, the three
detectives of the Special Branch of the Civic Guards Moore, Condon, and Rodgers opened
fire which killed Lynch, who had followed the lorry to see what was happening.
Against this unlawful event, the father of killed boy filed a case against three
detectives of the Special Branch of the Civic Guards Moore, Condon, and Rodgers as the
first three defendants and the fourth defendant was Mr. Fitzgerald, the Chief Superintendent
of Civic Guards who was in charge of the Civic Guards at Cork and he claimed damages
under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1846.
Justice Hanna expressed his views on this case in the trial that there is no case or
authority dealing with the position of an uncontrolled body of men in the employment of the
State left to use their firearms at their own discretion. He further quoted Case of Arms (1596),
‘a cry of made for weapons to keep the peace’ and in later cases, with instances where the
soldiers of the regular Army have fired upon civilians either with or without orders. In
addition, he mentioned Curwood’s Hawkins’ Pleas of the Crown in which the regulation of
firearms was given. Apart from the above he cited various acts, reports, legal papers with
regard to the same.
The justice expressed the three defendants did not follow the instructions issued to the
Civic Guards on the use of firearms, dated November 24 th, 1932, copies of which the Chief
Commissioner had sent for the use of the Court. The justice said that, according to law,
armed forces could use firearms only against an unlawful or riotous assembly only where
such a course was necessary as a last resort to preserve life. But what was done by the
defendants was not so and they violated the law. The Justice came to the conclusion that the
shot was done not to protect lives of buyers and others and completely was an unjustifiable
act and they (the three defendants) were acted as a group with a common unlawful purpose.
So, the Justice imposed a damage of 300 Pounds in favor of the Plaintiff under the Fatal
Accidents Act, 1846. Further, the Justice ordered for the criminal liability against the three
defendants.
21
CLC/AM/R/05
The current topic “Opinion and Dissenting Opinion in Repouille V. United States” is
the description of the opinions expressed by two Circuit Judges namely Judge Learned Hand
& Judge Jerome Frank in the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit on 05 th December,
1947.
THE OPINION
The opinion expressed by the judge Learned Hand given below as the first. The
District Attorney, on behalf of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, appealed from an
order, naturalizing the appellee, Louis Loftus Repouille who was a refuge. The ground of the
objection in the District Court and the Circuit Court of Appeals was that he (Repouille) did
not show himself to have been a person of “good moral character” for five years which
preceded the filing of his petition.
The facts of the case were that the petition was filed on September 22, 1944 and on
th
12 October 1939, he had deliberately put to death his son, a boy of thirteen by means of
Chloroform. The said reason for this was that the child had suffered from birth from a brain
injury which destined him to be an idiot and a physical monstrosity malformed in all four
limbs. The child was blind, mute, and deformed. Repouille had other four children at that
time and having responsibility of caring the burden of fifth. Initially, he was charged for
manslaughter in the first degree and because of clemency, the judge brought in a verdict of
manslaughter in the second degree. The judge sentenced him to not less than five years nor
more than ten. He conducted himself as a person of “good moral character” during the five
years before he filed his petition.
The Judge said that “good moral character” in the Nationality Act was like a test
which was very similar to a Gallup Poll. The killing of child was not deliberate but the moral
standards should properly be applied and followed in the society. He compared this case with
of a similar offender in Massachusetts who was not executed but imprisoned for life. Thus,
the judge Learned Hand dismissed the petition of Repouille for the citizenship.
22
CLC/AM/R/05
the data for both the petitioner’s side and Government side and to put them in record. Based
on those records, the judge should reconsider his decision and arrive at a conclusion. He
finally said that public opinion in this regard (for such cases) was not necessary. By giving
such verdict, Judge Frank recommended for a reconsideration of Repouille’s petition.
Joseph W Planck (1915-2004) was a former President of the State Bar of Michigan
(1951-1952) and was a member of the Michigan Board of Bar Examiners. A native of Union,
Michigan, he received his A.B from the University of Michigan in and later did his LL.B. He
was practicing in Lansing ever since being graduated from law school.
Joseph W Planck refutes the statement that the Law is a jealous mistress, which was a
popular proverb among the Anglo-American law fraternity. He believed that the statement
was a libelous one on a great profession like law and was utterly false or a fallacy. He put
forward the views of lawyers and litterateurs who were eminent authorities in their respective
fields, who agreed to and disagreed to the fundamentals of this statement/proverb.
He believed that the Lady Common Law does not like to lie alone, as believed by a
few eminent professionals. Instead he proposed that this venerable ghost be laid to rest. He
believed that law cannot be mastered in isolation. He said that the Lady of Common Law
requires a host of bedfellows. Some of them are decidedly practical. He was driving home
the point that ultimately the purpose of law is to attain social justice and therefore, it must be
mastered along with other disciplines such as History, Anthropology, Natural Science, Social
Science, Political Science, Economics, Psychology, and the like, which will help a student of
law integrate the philosophy of learning and life with practicing law.
Merely memorizing statues and law reports without paying attention to the subject of
Jurisprudence or Literature or Science is to give a poverty stricken meaning to the subject of
law. A lawyer must not merely store the precedents of law in his knowledge bank but must
possess the width of comprehension, the serenity of a broad overall outlook of life and the
catholicity of compassion, which can be attained by gaining an overall knowledge of all
aspects by interacting with subject matter experts from all fields like Philosophy, Economics
or History to name a few.
In this piece of prose, he put forward the thoughts and views expressed by many
eminent lawyers and specialists from Juvenal, a powerful Roman poet to Dean Leon Green
of North-Western University of the United States to Sir Frederick Macmillan, a British
Publisher, widely respected names in the literary circles and among the fraternity of lawyers.
He concluded by saying that it is time for the law fraternity to bury the popular fallacy that
the Law is a Jealous Mistress and an epitaph reading ‘Requiescat in pace!’ must be put on the
tombstone.
23
CLC/AM/R/05
UNIT – II
GRAMMAR & USAGE
1. COMMON ERRORS
a. Of all the countries in that area of the world, perhaps Nigeria ___the most potential.
(have/has)
b. Houses built in Victoria less than those in New South Wales. (cost/costs)
c. As most sports magazines can attest, playing sports such as tennis and basketball
____not only mental ability but also physical strength. (require/requires)
d. Common knowledge to anyone who studies science, the earth on its own axis once
every 24 hours. (revolve/revolves)
e. Of all the grammar points I have studied in my seven years of English, the most recent
unit me the most for a variety of reasons. (confuse/confuses)
Incorrect: It was not until a sociological view of the situation was combining with a
psychological approach that some progress was made.
24
CLC/AM/R/05
Revised: It was not until a sociological view of the situation combined with a
psychological approach that some progress was made.
Activity: Correct Verb Form
a. After I had eaten my lunch, I to her while she was eating hers. (was talking/have
talked/talked)
b. He has a party every weekend and his friends to it without fail. (come/are
coming/came)
c. He told me that the sun with a beautiful display of colours. (rises/rose/is rising)
d. She was late and he on the corner long before she came. (has been standing/had
been standing/is standing)
Incorrect: Tourism have been considered one of the most important factor in the
town’s economic development.
Revised: Tourism has been considered one of the most important factors in the town’s
economic development.
Note: Uncountable nouns such as knowledge, information, advice, progress, research
and machinery can be problematic
• Unclear pronoun reference makes sentences confusing, vague, and difficult to understand.
25
CLC/AM/R/05
Incorrect: The meeting ended with a call for humanitarian approach to be taken over a
plight of the refugees around the globe.
Revised: (general – around the globe) The meeting ended with a call for a
humanitarian approach to be taken over the plight of refugees around the globe.
Revised: (specific place – in East Timor) The meeting ended with a call for a
humanitarian approach to be taken over the plight of the refugees in East Timor.
Note: if a word begins with a consonant, but sounds as if it begins with a vowel it
should be treated as if it starts with a vowel, i.e. an hour, an heir
Activity: Articles
1) Are you shopping for health club to join so you can get in shape?
2) Shop wisely! You could end up choosing wrong club and losing more money
than pounds.
3) You may find that European vacation is just what you need.
4) When you undertake a research, you will need to gather data samples.
5) Doctors often use information manuals to keep up to date with new medications.
26
CLC/AM/R/05
Using the wrong preposition is a common error as most prepositions are not stressed or
pronounced clearly in speech. They are also often left out accidentally in writing.
Incorrect: The study emphasised on the need of further research to ascertain the
influence by television violence to young children.
Revised: The study emphasised on the need of further research to ascertain the
influence of television violence on young children.
6. Omitted commas
Apostrophes indicate possession for nouns, omissions in contractions and are, in general,
not used to indicate plurals.
Incorrect: In the current conflict, it’s uncertain who’s borders they are crossing.
Revised: In the current conflict it is uncertain whose borders they are crossing.
27
CLC/AM/R/05
Using a word with the wrong meaning often due to similar spelling or pronunciation can
occur when using spell check!
29
CLC/AM/R/05
Note: There are 144 patterns totally. They can be formed adding “Adjunct” to
the basic patterns.
ADJUNCT is the optional element in the sentence.
It answers the questions How? Why? When? Where?
VI. SVA ( Subject + Verb + Adjunct )
30
CLC/AM/R/05
31
CLC/AM/R/05
32
CLC/AM/R/05
main clause 'I will go to the market' and a subordinate clause 'if you come with me'. The
main clause 'I will go to the market' makes complete sense on its own. But, the subordinate
clause 'if you come with me' does not make complete sense on its own and depends on the
main clause for its complete meaning.
Based on the function they perform in the sentence, clauses can be categorized as:
• Noun Clause- is a group of words which contains a Subject and Predicate of its own, and
does the work of a noun. For example, "I like what I see" as a way of saying "I like cakes".
The highlighted portion is a clause that is functioning as noun.
• Adjective Clause-usually comes after the noun it qualifies and is made up of several
words which, like all clauses, will include a subject and a verb. It answers the adjective
questions 'What kind? How many? Or Which one?" For example, "The umbrella which has a
broken handle is mine”. The highlighted portion is a clause that is functioning as an
adjective.
• Adverb Clause-is a group of words which contains a Subject and Predicate of its own,
and does the work of an adverb. It answers the adverb questions How? When? Where? Or
Why? For example, "You may sit wherever you like." The highlighted portion is a clause that
is functioning as an adverb.
Identify the clauses and point it whether it is a Noun Clause, Adjective Clause, Adverb
Clause.
a. The bankers need to know what they should do.
b. The books, which are lost, are not really necessary.
c. Whether you like it or not, you have to go to bed now.
d. Students who are intelligent get good grades.
e. No one knows he is.
f. When I was younger, I thought so.
g. He laughs best who laughs last.
h. I went to see what had happened.
i. He met a girl whose eyes were blue.
j. I shall remain where I am.
UNIT – II 2. (C) ‘WH’ QUESTIONS AND OTHER QUESTIONS
34
CLC/AM/R/05
Indirect question (that includes an embedded question): Could you tell me where the
station is?
2. We can also use embedded questions as part of statements. The embedded question is a
noun clause and can be used in a similar way to a noun. For example, we can use it as the
subject or the object of the main clause.
Normal question: Where does she work?
Embedded question in a statement: I don’t know where she works. (Here ‘where she
works’ is the object.)
Embedded question in a statement: Where she works is very far. (Here ‘where she
works’ is the subject.)
3. We use normal sentence grammar (so we don’t need ‘do / does / did’).
4. We use normal sentence word order (subject + verb, not the opposite).
5. We use a full stop and not a question mark at the end of the sentence.
Here are some examples of verbs that we often use with embedded questions:
Wonder I wonder why she said that.
Find out Let’s find out what time the show starts.
Subject questions
If you start with a subject question, you don’t need to change the grammar much, because it
is already similar to a statement.
Normal subject question: Who loves Julie?
36
CLC/AM/R/05
37
CLC/AM/R/05
38
CLC/AM/R/05
The question tag of an affirmative imperative sentence is both affirmative- ‘will you?’ and
negative – ‘won’t you?’; as,
Switch on the radio, will you?
Switch on the radio, won’t you?
Please give me money, will you?
Please give me money, won’t you?
Kindly post this letter, will you?
Kindly post this letter, won’t you?
Rule (5)
The question tag of a negative imperative sentence is affirmative – ‘will you?’; as,
Don’t open the window, will
you? Don’t spit here, will you?
Don’t switch off the light, will you?
Don’t be late tomorrow, will you?
Don’t make a noise, will you?
Rule (6)
If an affirmative imperative sentence is used to express the sense of ‘more urgency’, the
negative question tag – ‘won’t you?’ is used; as,
Remember to shut the window, won’t you?
Be careful while solving the sums, won’t you?
Rule (7)
If the verb used in an imperative sentence denotes the sense of reprimand, the question tag-
‘can’t you?’ is used; as,
Use your own mind, can’t you?
Use your own book, can’t you?
Rule (8)
39
CLC/AM/R/05
If the imperative sentences begins with ‘Let us’ or ‘Let’s’, it denotes ‘proposal’ or
‘suggestion’ and the question tag – ‘shall we?’ is used for it; as,
Let us dance together, shall we?
Let us help her, shall we?
Let us do this work, shall we?
Let’s go there, shall we?
Let’s read the Gita, shall we?
Rule (9)
If the imperative sentence begins with ‘Let me’, ‘Let him’, ‘Let her’, ‘Let them’, ‘Let
Karan’; as,
Let me do this work, will you?
Let her be my beloved, will you?
Let him go, will you?
Let them do their homework, will you?
Let Aman watch, TV will you?
Rule (10)
If the verb – ‘used to’ is used in a sentence, the negative verb- ‘usedn’t’ or ‘didn’t’ is used in
a question tag; as,
He used to come here, usedn’t he?
He used to come here, didn’t he?
They usedn’t to come here, used they?
They used n’t to come here, did they?
Rule (11)
If the marginal Auxiliary verbs- ‘dare not’ or ‘daren’t’ and ‘need not’ or ‘needn’t’ are used in
a sentence, the affirmative question tag structure; as,
He daren’t come here, dare he?
40
CLC/AM/R/05
41
CLC/AM/R/05
42
CLC/AM/R/05
43
CLC/AM/R/05
I. SIMPLE SENTENCE
A simple sentence, which is really just an independent clause, contains a subject and a
predicate and expresses a complete thought.
Examples:
A. Roses are red.
Notes:
In example C, there are two verbs (like and hate) but only one subject (I). In example
D, there are two subjects (Robert and Martha) but only one verb (are). These are
known as compound verbs and compound subjects, respectively.
“Simple” does NOT mean the same thing as “short.” This is a simple sentence:
Charles, my seven-year-old dog, is really lethargic and doesn’t like doing anything
besides sleeping all day, barking at family members but not strangers, chasing after
the cat, and waiting for his steak dinner.
Examples:
A. Bring your No. 2 pencil. (Understood: You bring your No. 2 pencil.)
B. Get the check. (Understood: You get the check.)
II.COMPOUND SENTENCE
A compound sentence contains two independent clauses that are joined together by a comma
and a coordinating conjunction. These coordinating conjunctions are: for, and, nor, but, or,
yet, and so. (Together, they spell FANBOYS.)
Examples:
44
CLC/AM/R/05
Notes:
The coordinating conjunction that you use (yes, that one little word) can have a
dramatic impact on the meaning of your sentence. Consider these examples:
You need both the comma and the coordinating conjunction to join two independent
clauses. Without the comma, it would be a run-on sentence. Without the coordinating
conjunction, the sentence would have a comma splice. (We will discuss these errors
at the “Common Errors” workshop).
Notes:
We use a comma if the dependent clause comes before the independent clause. We
don’t use one if the dependent clause comes after the independent clause.
Even though each clause in example A contains a subject and a verb, we cannot put a period
after “When the sun is down” because it is not a complete thought on its own. It leaves us
hanging and makes us want to ask, “When the sun is down, then what happens?”.
45
CLC/AM/R/05
State which of the following sentences are Compound, and which are Complex.
1. The horse reared and the rider was thrown.
2. Walk quickly; else you will not overtake him.
3. The town in which I live is very large.
4. I called him, but he gave me no answer.
5. I agree to your proposals, for I think them reasonable.
46
CLC/AM/R/05
Past Tense
Future Tense
Present Tense
(1) Simple Present- It is used to denote scientific facts, universal truths and work
done on daily basis.
47
CLC/AM/R/05
(2) Present Continuous– It is used to express an action taking place at the time of
speaking.
(3) Present Perfect– It is used to show an action that started in the past and has
just finished.
48
CLC/AM/R/05
(4) Present Perfect Continuous– This tense show the action which started in the
past and is still continuing.
INTERROGATIVE NEGATIVE RULE --- has/have + she + not + been + v1 + ing + object
Past Tense
49
CLC/AM/R/05
Tense symbolizes the ever moving, non-stop wheel of time which is forever busy gathering
moments of future and throwing them into the dustbin of past
Past (before
now)
1. Simple Past
Used to indicate an action completed in the past. It often occurs with adverb of time.
Sometimes it is used without an adverb of time.
Used for past habits.
Eg. I played football when I was a child.
Rule: Subject + V2
Eg She wrote a letter
1. Assertive Sentences – Subject + V2 + Object + (.)
50
CLC/AM/R/05
51
CLC/AM/R/05
Time and tide wait for no man. So, a period of time following the moment of speaking or
writing is called as future tense.
For e.g. - She will write a letter.
Tense
Simple Future
This tense tells us about an action which has not occurred yet and will occur after saying or
in future
Rule: Will/Shall + Verb (1st form)
In Future Tense helping verb ‘Shall’ is used with ‘I’ and ‘We’. Helping verb ‘Will’ is used
with all others. When you are to make a commitment or warn someone or emphasize
something, use of 'will/shall' is reversed. ‘Will’ is used with ‘I’ & ‘We’ and 'shall' is used
with others.
In general speaking there is hardly any difference between 'shall & will' and normally ‘Will’
is used with all.
Now, let us use this rule in various forms of sentences;
1.Positive / Affirmative Sentences –
54
CLC/AM/R/05
3.Interrogative Sentences-
55
CLC/AM/R/05
2. Negative Sentences-
Subject + Will/Shall + Not + Have been + Verb (1st form) + Ing + Object+ (.)
She will not have been writing a letter.
3. Interrogative Sentences-
Will/Shall + Subject + Have been + Verb (1st form) + Ing + Object +(?)
Will she have been writing a letter?
56
CLC/AM/R/05
Will/Shall + Subject + Not + Have been + Verb (1st form) + Ing + Object +(?)
Will she not have been writing a letter?
UNIT – II 3. (ii) CONCORD
Introduction
Concord literally means harmony, agreement. Thus, it means harmony between different
members of a group. When we talk of sentences, concord means harmony or agreement
between different parts of a sentence, specially the subject and the verb.
Every sentence says something about a person or thing. The part of a sentence that names the
person or thing is called Subject or the part, which gives us information about the Subject is
called Predicate.
It should be noted that the article is used only once if the two nouns refer to the same person.
If different persons were referred to, the article would be used before each noun and the verb
would be plural.
E.g., The orator and the statesman are dead.
• If two subjects together express one idea, the verb will be in the singular,
E.g., Early to bed and early to rise makes a man healthy, wealthy and wise.
Slow and steady wins the race.
• If singular subjects have ‘each’ or ‘every’ before them, the verb is usually singular.
E.g., Every man, woman and child was lost.
Each day and each hour brings its duty.
• Two or more singular subjects connected by ‘or’, ‘nor’, ‘either’, ’neither’ or ‘nor’ take a
verb in the singular,
E.g., Neither Hari nor Ravi has come.
No nook or corner was left unexplored.
• When the subjects joined by ‘or’, ‘nor’ are of different numbers, the verb must be plural,
and the plural subject must be placed next to the verb. e.g.,
Hari or his brothers have done this.
Either the boy or his parents have gone there.
57
CLC/AM/R/05
• When the subjects joined by ‘or’, ‘nor’ are of different persons, the verb agrees in person
with the one nearest to it,
E.g., Either he or I am mistaken.
Neither you nor he is to blame.
• A collective noun takes a singular verb when the collection is thought of as a whole.
E.g., The counsel has chosen its president.
The fleet has set sail.
• It should however be kept in mind that if the individuals of which the collective noun is
composed of are thought of, it can take a plural verb.
E.g., The military work called out.
The crews were taken prisoners.
• Some nouns which are plural in form, but singular in meaning, take a singular verb,
E.g., The news is true.
Physics is a branch of natural science.
• When a plural noun counts between a singular subject and its verb, the verb used is singular
in form.
E.g., Each of the sisters is clever.
A variety of objects charms the eye.
The quality of the mangoes was not good.
• Words joined to a singular subject by with, together with, in addition to or as well as are
parenthetical and therefore do not affect the number of verb.
E.g., The chief, with all his men, was killed
Justice as well as mercy, allows.
• When the subject of the verb is a relative pronoun, care should be taken to see that the verb
agrees in number and person with the antecedent of the relative.
E.g., I, who am your friend, will guard you interest.
You, who are my friend, should not worry me.
58
CLC/AM/R/05
• The title of a book, play, story, musical composition and the name of a country, even
though plural in form take a singular verb,
E.g., Sons and Lovers is an interesting Novel.
The United States of America is a developed country.
Assessment Questions
Fill in the blanks with correct form of the verb:
1. Two and two ……………… four.
2. Bread and butter ……………. take wholesome food.
3. Gulliver’s travels ……………. written by swift.
4. A good man and useful citizen ……………passed away.
5. Each of the boys…………………….rewarded.
6. The jury…………………divided in their opinion.
7. He is one of the authors who…………………destined to be immortal.
8. Neither of the boys…………….quite at his ease.
9. The cost of these articles……………risen.
10. Every leaf and every flower……………..stripped off the tree.
11. The horse and trap………………………been waiting for a long time.
12. The Arabian Nights……………delighted many generations.
13. Kindness as well as justice……………..to be our guide.
14. No news …………………good news.
15. Forty yards ………………a good distance.
16. The meeting …………………..chosen a president.
17. The public……………….requested not to walk on the grass.
18. Iron as well as gold……………………..found in India.
59
CLC/AM/R/05
When the verb in a sentence shows that the subject is not the doer of the action, the verb is in
the passive voice. (Generally you will find “by” in the sentence. If “by” is not there, you can
put a question “Who?”, you will get an answer.)
Examples:
60
CLC/AM/R/05
1. These pictures were painted by children: (pictures – subject; painted – verb; children -
object
5. If the subject or the object in an active voice sentence is a pronoun (I, we, you, he,
she, they, it) it changes: (I-me; we-us; you-you; he-him; she-her; they-them; it-it) and
vice-versa. E.g. I wrote a letter – A letter was written by me. The prefect does keep
accusing me daily – I am being accused by the prefect daily.
7. If the verb in the active voice sentence has a modal in it, the verb is changed to –
modal + be + the past participle. E.g. Rajesh can lift this box. This box can be lifted
by Rajesh. We should obey the rules. The rules should be obeyed.
8. When there are two objects, only one object is interchanged. The second object
remains unchanged. (He told me a story – He- subject; me – object 1; a story – object
2) (I was told a story by him; a story was told to me by him).
The table below shows how the verb is changed into its passive voice form in different
tenses.
The present perfect He has eaten an apple. An apple has been eaten
61
CLC/AM/R/05
by him.
The past continuous He was eating an apple An apple was being eaten
by him
The past perfect He had eaten an apple An apple had been eaten
by him
The Future continuous He will be eating an apple. An apple will have been
eaten by him.
The Future in the past He would have eaten an An apple would have been
apple eaten by him
Note: Some of the sentences like – sentences constructed using auxiliary verbs ( Hariharan is
a good boy); perfect continuous tenses ( in all the three time periods – Present, Past, Future)
(My roommate has been copying my homework) and intransitive verbs ( I go to temple or
she has gone to the market) cannot be converted into passive form .
UNIT – II 4. REPORTED SPEECH
TENSE CHANGES
62
CLC/AM/R/05
DIRECT INDIRECT
• Present Simple • Past Simple
63
CLC/AM/R/05
Note:
1. The Past perfect Simple and Past Perfect Continuous do not change in reported speech.
2. The modals should, could, would, might and ought to do not change.
3. When we report questions, we also change the word order to that of a regular sentence.
64
CLC/AM/R/05
Peter. Sally told Peter that she had given him her
notebook.
66
CLC/AM/R/05
EXERCISES
I. Write these sentences in Reported Speech. Use as many specifying verbs as
possible.
1. “If I had spoken to my father as you speak to me he’d have beaten me,” he said to me.
___________________________________________________________________
2. “Will you help me, please?” she said. “I can’t lift it by myself”.
___________________________________________________________________
3. Tom: I’ll pay.
___________________________________________________________________
5. The detective inquired, “What was the time of death?”
___________________________________________________________________
6. “How can I possibly run in this tight skirt?” she inquired.
___________________________________________________________________
7. She explained, “It’s very cold in here. The heater must have broken down.”
___________________________________________________________________
8. “It’s seven”, he said. “She’ll be at home now. What about ringing her up?”
___________________________________________________________________
II. Fill the gaps using the verbs in the box. Use each verb only once.
He ________________ to do it.
8. You should have lessons,” she said.
III. Put the following into direct speech with the appropriate punctuation.
1. My employer hoped I would not be offended if he told me that, in his opinion, I would do
better in some other kind of job.
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
2. He said that two days previously an enormous load of manure had been dumped at his
front gate and that since then he hadn’t been able to get his car out.
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
3. They offered me some more wine and I accepted.
___________________________________________________________________
4. He said that if I found the front door locked I was to go round to the back.
___________________________________________________________________
5. He suggested that Tom and I should go ahead and get the tickets.
___________________________________________________________________
6. He said that if I didn’t like escalators I could go up an emergency staircase. I thanked him
and said that I would do that.
________________________________________________________________________
7. I asked him if he had enjoyed doing his military service and he said that he hadn’t.
___________________________________________________________________
8. I asked if she had looked everywhere and she said that she had.
___________________________________________________________________
69
CLC/AM/R/05
70
CLC/AM/R/05
A B
1. I’m not going to answer your a) They accused her of…
questions.
b) He admitted that…
2. I didn’t do anything wrong.
c) The doctor advised me not to…
3. I’ll lend you the money when you need
it. d) She agreed to…
16. If you don’t pay me the money, I’ll s) She warned them not to… because…
take you to court.
t) They wondered what…
17. You shouldn’t smoke so much.
71
CLC/AM/R/05
weekend?
Match the purposes in A with the sentences in B and write the reported sentences.
72
CLC/AM/R/05
A B
a) accusation 1. Would you like to go to the cinema with me this
evening?
b) admission
2. I’d rather have Chinese food than a hamburger.
c) advice
3. If you do that again, McDonald, do you know what I’m
d) agreement going to do to you?
e) apology 4. Would you like me to lift it for you, Mum?
f) begging / a 5. I didn’t do it, I tell you! I didn’t kill him!
request
6. You won’t forget to post the letter, will you, dear?
g) complaint
7. Well, in a situation like this, I always say it’s better to
h) denial tell the truth and pay the fine.
i) exclamation 8. I’m terribly sorry I said that.
j) information 9. I’ll wear this ring till the day I die!
k) invitation 10. Get out! Get out of my sight!
l) offer 11. Waiter! There’s a fly in my soup.
m) order 12. Why don’t you write her a letter?
n) preference 13. What a horrible dress you’re wearing, dear!
o) promise 14. I’m afraid I did it. I took it. It’s my fault.
p) refusal 15. The next train leaves at five o’clock, madam.
q) reminder 16. No! I don’t see why I should do your work for you.
r) suggestion 17. Please Mum, please, can I stay up late and watch the
s) threat film?
t) warning 18. You did this, Burkin. You stole the money!
73
CLC/AM/R/05
74
CLC/AM/R/05
Comparative: Subhas Bose was greater than most (many) other patriots of India.
Positive: Very few patriots of India were so great as Subhas Bose.
5) Positive: Some girls in the class are at least as beautiful as Sita.
Comparative: Sita is not more beautiful than some other girls in the class Or
Some girls in the class are not less beautiful than Sita.
Superlative: Sita is not the most beautiful of all the girls in the Class.
Bits for practice
1) This summer is _________ than the previous summer. (hot)
2) Harsha is the _________ boy in the class. (intelligent)
3) Her doll is _________ than yours. (pretty)
4) Name the _________ city in the world. (big)
5) He is the _________ friend I have. (good)
6) Iron is _________ than any other metal. (useful)
7) Ram’s work is bad, Hari’s is _________, but Govind’s work is the _________. (bad)
8) Silver is _________ than gold. (cheap)
9) The Eiffel Tower is _________ than the Qutub Minar. (tall)
10) Akbar was the _________ Mughal Emperor. (great)
11) Prevention is _________ than cure. (good)
12) Mathematics is the _________ subject. (difficult)
13) Apples are _________ than oranges. (Costly)
14) Mr. Sharma is the _________ person I have ever seen. (fat)
15) This suitcase is _________ than that one. (heavy)
16) The number of boys present was _________ than the number of girls present in the class.
(many)
17) Sita was the _________ tired of them all. (little)
76
CLC/AM/R/05
Exercise IV:
1) Sharukh Khan is not greater than Dilip Kumar. (Use ‘as great as’)
2) My house is at least as big as yours. (Use ‘not bigger than’)
3) The Taj Mahal is at least as famous as the Statue of Liberty. (Use ‘not more famous than’)
4) Sanjeev is not fatter than Veeru. (Use ‘as fat as’)
5) This tree is as old as that tree. (Use ‘not older than’)
Exercise V:
1) Tennyson is not greater than some other poets. (Use ‘not the greatest)
2) Some boys are at least as industrious as Suresh (use ‘not more industrious than’)
3) This is not the best college in the city. (use ‘as good as’)
4) Rohan is not the dullest boy in the class. (Use ‘not duller than’)
5) Some students are at least as clever as Rani. (Use ‘not the cleverest’)
Answer Key
Exercise I:
1) Mount Everest is higher than any other peak in the world.
2) No other drama in Sanskrit is as good as Shakunthala.
3) Malacca is the oldest town in Malaysia.
4) No other animal is as ferocious as the lion.
5) He is the richest man in the village.
Exercise II:
1) The cow is one of the most useful animals.
2) Very few boys are as hard working as Latif.
3) Ashoka was more powerful than many other emperors.
4) India is one of the hottest countries.
5) Keats is greater than many other poets.
78
CLC/AM/R/05
Exercise III:
1) Gold is more precious than silver.
2) The sword is not as mighty as the pen.
3) A horse doesn’t run as fast as a deer.
4) My knife is sharper than yours.
5) A wise enemy is better than a foolish friend.
Exercise IV:
1) Dileep Kumar is not as great as Sharukh Khan.
2) Your house is not bigger than mine.
3) The Statue of Liberty is not more famous than the Taj Mahal.
4) Veeru is as fat as Sanjeev.
5) That tree is not older than this tree.
Exercise V:
1) Tennyson is not the greatest poet.
2) Suresh is not more industrious than some other boys.
3) Some colleges in the city are at least as good as this.
4) Rohan is not duller than some other boys in the class.
5) Rani is not the cleverest student.
UNIT – III
VOCABULARY
1. PREFIXES AND SUFFIXES
is also a letter or a group of letters, but it appears at the end of any word. It is used to change
the word so that it can fit into a sentence grammatically. Like forget and forgetful “ful” is the
suffix here.
Collectively, if suffix and prefix are combined then it is known as affixes. Both prefix
and suffix are not words in general, but the addition of either of them can make or break a
word. When you use only suffix or prefix in a sentence than it would not make sense. To
denote the incompletion of a word, we put a hyphen to denote them.
We need to study prefix and suffix so that we can be comfortable with the English
language. Further, you develop an ability to easily recognize the word that you do not know
of or you are not familiar with. It is already known that confidence with vocabulary goes a
long way in speaking, listening, reading, and writing. There are a few things you need to
understand while learning prefixes and suffixes.
Important Points on Prefixes
1. Different prefixes which are used in the English language can also have the same
meaning. For example, in-, un-, not- all have the same meaning which is, ‘opposite
of’ or ‘not’. Similarly, the prefix is- and mis- means incorrectly or wrongly.
2. Repetition of letters is also possible. That is to say that when im- or unto word and if
the word starts with ‘m’ and ‘n’ respectively then the double letters are also possible.
For example immeasurable and unnoticeable.
3. You need to be careful while seeing the words which starts with the prefix but do not
contain the prefix. For example, the word uncle is a whole word. It does not have any
prefix at the beginning.
4. The addition of prefix should not change the spelling of the base word. For example,
when you add ‘un’ to the word happy the spelling will be unhappy which is the same
spelling as the base word.
2. For suffixes, the spelling of the base word can change when you add a suffix at the
80
CLC/AM/R/05
end. This is mostly true for the words ending with ‘y’ at the end. For example, when a
suffix is added to the word crazy it will change into crazier or craziness.
3. The above statement is also true for the base words which end with a silent ‘e’. For
example, make and manage will change into making and managing when you add the
suffix ‘ing’ to both the words. But not all words ending with ‘e’ will have a different
spelling.
Practice Questions
Type I: Use prefix in the below words to find out its opposite word.
1. Sense
2. Happy
3. Wrap
4. Connect
Answer:
1. Nonsense
2. Unhappy
3. Unwrap
4. Disconnect
Type II: Use the prefix or suffix to the given word provided in the bracket in its
appropriate form.
1. You can’t just believe it. The plot was _____ (believable)
2. I saw her just a few days ago, still, I miss her. It looks like she just _______
(appeared)
3. I am sorry; I didn’t mean to hurt you. I must have ______ you. (Understood)
Answer:
81
CLC/AM/R/05
1. Unbelievable
2. Disappeared
3. Misunderstood
4. A person who starves the body for the good of soul.- Ascetic
8. A person who believes that the pursuit of pleasure is the most important thing in life –
Hedonist
13. A person who lives a solitary life and tends to avoid other people- Recluse
82
CLC/AM/R/05
18. A person who looks at the bright side of the things – Optimist
27. One who leaves his native place to settle in another – Emigrant
29. The practice of having two wives of husbands at same time – Bigamy
49. A man with characteristics what are more often associated with females – Effeminate
54. A man employed to look after the horses of people staying at an inn – Ostler
72. Violence activity to damage public property without any good reason – Vandalism
86. A disease that spreads over a whole country or the world – Pandemic
86
CLC/AM/R/05
us take the example of the word “jump”. The words leap, bounce, hop are all synonymous to
jump, i.e. they have the same (or very similar) meanings.
At sometimes there are cases where the word has more than one meaning. The meaning
of the word can only be judged by the context in which it has been used as a sentence. In
such a case the synonyms of the word will also differ according to the context. Let us take
the example of the word “free”.
One meaning of the word free is to be without restrictions, and in this case, the
synonym would be ‘independent’.
Another meaning of the word free is to be free of charge, and so here the synonym
would be ‘complementary’ or ‘gratuitous’.
Antonyms
Now as opposed to a synonym, an antonym is a word whose meaning is exactly
opposite to another word, in the same language. It originates from the Greek word “anti”
which stands for opposite and “onym” which stands for “name”. For example the antonym
for hot is cold, and the antonym for up is down.
Antonyms are actually quite useful in the English language. At times it is easy to
understand the meaning and the context of a difficult word, by knowing what the opposite of
the word means. Take for example the word “mundane” whose synonym is “humdrum”. The
antonym of mundane is “extraordinary” or “imaginative”. Now the word mundane has much
better clarity.
Even while writing, one may be using the same words too often making the prose drab
and boring. Using antonyms, without changing the meaning of a sentence, can be a good way
to make things interesting.
Examples of Synonyms and Antonyms
87
CLC/AM/R/05
UNIT – IV
COMPREHENSION
Passage: 01
Read the passage and answer the questions that follow:
Mike and Morris lived in the same village. While Morris owned the largest jewelry
shop in the village, Mike was a poor farmer. Both had large families with many sons,
daughters-in-law and grandchildren. One fine day, Mike, tired of not being able to fed his
family, decided to leave the village and move to the city where he was certain to earn enough
to feed everyone. Along with his family, he left the village for the city. At night, they stopped
under a large tree. There was a stream running nearby where they could freshen up
themselves. He told his sons to clear the area below the tree, he told his wife to fetch water
and he instructed his daughters-in-law to make up the fire and started cutting wood from the
88
CLC/AM/R/05
tree himself. They didn’t know that in the branches of the tree, there was a thief hiding. He
watched as Mike’s family worked together and also noticed that they had nothing to cook.
Mike’s wife also thought the same and asked her husband, “Everything is ready but what
shall we eat? ” Mike raised his hands to heaven and said, “Don’t worry. He is watching all
this from above. He will help us.”
The thief got worried as he had seen that the family was large and worked well
together. Taking advantage of the fact that they did not know he was hiding in the branches,
he decided to make a quick escape. He climbed down safely when they were not looking and
ran for his life. But, he left behind the bundle of stolen jewels and money which dropped into
Mike’s lap. Mike opened it and jumped with joy when he saw the contents. The family
gathered all their belongings and returned to the village. There was great excitement when
they told everyone how they got rich.
Morris thought that the tree was miraculous and this was a nice and quick way to earn
some money. He ordered his family to pack some clothes and they set off as if on a journey.
They also stopped under the same tree and Morris started commanding everyone as Mike had
done. But no one in his family was willing to obey his orders. Being a rich family, they were
used to having servants all around. So, the one who went to the river to fetch water enjoyed a
nice bath.
The one who went to get the wood for fire went off to sleep. Morris’s wife said ”
Everything is ready but what shall we eat ?” Morris raised his hands and said, “Don’t worry.
He is watching all this from above. He will help us.” As soon as he finished saying, the thief
jumped down from the tree with a knife in hand. Seeing him everyone started running here
and there to save their lives. The thief stole everything they had and Morris and his family
had to return to the village empty handed having lost all their valuables that they had taken
with them.
Question 1: Why did Mike and his family decide to rest under the thief’s tree?
A) Being a large family, they knew that they could easily defeat the thief
B) It was a convenient spot for taking a halt at night
C) There was a stream nearby and wood enough to build a house
D) That was the only large tree that could shelter their large family
Solution: B) It was a convenient spot for taking a halt at night
89
CLC/AM/R/05
Question 5 : How did the fellow villagers react to Mike getting rich overnight?
A) They were jealous of him
B) They were very excited
C) They followed his example
D) They envied him
Solution: B) They were very excited.
Passage: 02
The Economic transformation of India is one of the great business stories of our time.
As stifling government regulations have been lifted, entrepreneurship has flourished, and the
country has become a high-powered centre for information technology and pharmaceuticals.
Indian companies like Infosys and Wipro are powerful global players, while Western firms
like G.E. and I.B.M. now have major research facilities in India employing thousands.
India’s seemingly endless flow of young, motivated engineers, scientists, and managers
offering developed-world skills at developing-world wages is held to be putting American
jobs at risk, and the country is frequently heralded as “the next economic superpower.”
But India has run into a surprising hitch on its way to superpower status: its
inexhaustible supply of workers is becoming exhausted. Although India has one of the
youngest workforces on the planet, the head of Infosys said recently that there was an “acute
shortage of skilled manpower,” and a study by Hewitt Associates projects that this year
salaries for skilled workers will rise fourteen and a half per cent, a sure sign that demand for
skilled labor is outstripping supply.
90
CLC/AM/R/05
How is this possible in a country that every year produces two and a half million
college graduates and four hundred thousand engineers? Start with the fact that just ten per
cent of Indians get any kind of post-secondary education, compared with some fifty per cent
who do in the U.S. Moreover, of that ten per cent, the vast majority go to one of India’s
seventeen thousand colleges, many of which are closer to community colleges than to four-
year institutions. India does have more than three hundred universities, but a recent survey by
the London Times Higher Education Supplement put only two of them among the top
hundred in the world. Many Indian graduates, therefore, enter the workforce with a low level
of skills. A current study led by Vivek Wadhwa, of Duke University, has found that if you
define “engineer” by U.S. standards, India produces just a hundred and seventy thousand
engineers a year, not four hundred thousand. Infosys says that, of 1.3 million applicants for
jobs last year, it found only two per cent acceptable.
There was a time when many economists believed that post-secondary education
didn’t have much impact on economic growth. The really important educational gains, they
thought, came from giving rudimentary skills to large numbers of people (which India still
needs to do—at least thirty per cent of the population is illiterate). They believed that, in
economic terms, society got a very low rate of return on its investment in higher education.
But lately that assumption has been overturned, and the social rate of return on investment in
university education in India has been calculated at an impressive nine or ten per cent. In
other words, every dollar India puts into higher education creates value for the economy as a
whole. Yet India spends roughly three and a half per cent of its G.D.P. on education,
significantly below the percentage spent by the U.S., even though India’s population is much
younger, and spending on education should be proportionately higher.
The irony of the current situation is that India was once considered to be
overeducated. In the seventies, as its economy languished, it seemed to be a country with too
many engineers and Ph.D.s working as clerks in government offices. Once the Indian
business climate loosened up, though, that meant companies could tap a backlog of hundreds
of thousands of eager, skilled workers at their disposal. Unfortunately, the educational
system did not adjust to the new realities. Between 1985 and 1997, the number of teachers in
India actually fell, while the percentage of students enrolled in high school or college rose
more slowly than it did in the rest of the world. Even as the need for skilled workers was
increasing, India was devoting relatively fewer resources to producing them.
Since the Second World War, the countries that have made successful leaps from
developing to developed status have all poured money, public and private, into education.
South Korea now spends a higher percentage of its national income on education than nearly
any other country in the world. Taiwan had a system of universal primary education before
its phase of hypergrowth began. And, more recently, Ireland’s economic boom was spurred,
in part, by an opening up and expansion of primary and secondary schools and increased
91
CLC/AM/R/05
funding for universities. Education will be all the more important for India’s well-being; the
earlier generation of so-called Asian Tigers depended heavily on manufacturing, but India’s
focus on services and technology will require a more skilled and educated workforce.
India has taken tentative steps to remedy its skills famine—the current government
has made noises about doubling spending on education, and a host of new colleges and
universities have sprung up since the mid-nineties. But India’s impressive economic
performance has made the problem seem less urgent than it actually is, and allowed the
government to defer difficult choices. (In a country where more than three hundred million
people live on a dollar a day, producing college graduates can seem like a low priority.)
Ultimately, the Indian government has to pull off a very tough trick, making serious changes
at a time when things seem to be going very well. It needs, in other words, a clear sense of
everything that can still go wrong. The paradox of the Indian economy today is that the more
certain its glowing future seems to be, the less likely that future becomes.
Questions:
1. Which of these could you infer according to the passage?
a. Wages in the Developing countries are less as compared to wages in the developed
countries.
b. Wages in the Developing countries are more as compared to wages in the developed
countries.
c. Wages in the Developing countries are same as wages in the developed countries.
d. None of these.
2. What does “American jobs” in the last line of the first paragraph of the passage
imply?
92
CLC/AM/R/05
a. Democratic.
b. Liberal.
c. Impeding.
d. Undemocratic.
5. What is an appropriate title to the passage?
a. The economic progress is impressive, but the poor (earning one dollar per day) are not
benefited.
b. The economic progress is impressive disallowing the government to take tough decisions.
c. There is not enough skilled workforces and the government does not realize this.
d. Government is not ready to invest in setting up new universities.
8. Why are salaries for skilled workers rising?
93
CLC/AM/R/05
UNIT – V
COMPOSITION
1. PRECISE WRITING
94
CLC/AM/R/05
There are no rigid rules regarding the length of a precise. But as a general rule, it
should not contain more than a third of the total number of words in the original passage.
Uses of Precise writing
Most people read carelessly and fail to fully comprehend the meaning of the passage.
Precise writing forces them to pay attention to what they read because no one can write a
summary of a passage unless they read it carefully. So summarizing teaches one to read with
concentration.
Precise writing also improves your overall writing skills. It teaches you how to express
your thoughts clearly, concisely and effectively. You learn to choose your words carefully
and construct your sentences in a logical and concise manner.
Features of a Good Precise
A good Precise:
is not just lifting of the sentences from the original. It should be written in the
precise writer's own words.
must have coherence; must use linking devices such as so, therefore, and,
because further etc. and must follow the
Do's in a Precise:
Start your précis by highlighting the main idea of the passage and you should
create contextual environment where you can place the necessary points. Once
the main idea is established in the précis, you can present the methods, points,
facts etc. used by the author of the passage.
95
CLC/AM/R/05
Remove what is superfluous and retain the core essence of the work.
State the purpose of the research or piece of writing (why was it important to
conduct this research or write on this topic?)
Don'ts in a Precise:
Do not insert any question in your précis. Its significance, if essential, may be
expressed by a statement.
Do not be jerky. This suggests that most probably, you have not understood
the sense of the passage properly.
Look-out for the total number of words. If the number is not provided, quickly
calculate the number using approximations.
In order to understand the passage clearly, make sure that you read the passage
closely, and give it a couple of reads before you start writing the precise.
96
CLC/AM/R/05
Highlight the most important points in the passage, and make notes. Leave out all
non-essential information from the precise.
Note making is an essential task for writing précis. You should try to arrange the
points in most logical order, and ensure the order of thought is the same as the
original.
The three grammatical rules you need to follow while writing a precise are: write it in
third person, indirect form and appropriate past tense.
It is advisable to provide designations of officials rather than names and titles. In case
the official designation is not provided, you can use the personal name. Kindly be
consistent with the pattern you adopt.
Make sure you review your rough draft, remove the chinks and ensure that you have
made no language related errors.
Before writing your precise, make sure you have a glance over the original to make
sure you have not missed anything.
Finally, a wise policy would be a count the words of your precise and put them down
in a bracket at the end.
Passage:
There is an enemy beneath our feet - an enemy more deadly for his complete impartiality.
He recognizes no national boundaries, no political parties. Everyone in the world is
threatened by him. The enemy is the earth itself. When an earthquake strikes, the world
trembles. The power of a quake is greater than anything man himself can produce. But today
scientists are directing a great deal of their effort into finding some way of combating
earthquakes, and it is possible that at some time in the near future mankind will have
discovered a means of protecting itself from earthquakes.
An earthquake strikes without warning. When it does, its power is immense. If it strikes a
modern city, the damage it causes is as great as if it has struck a primitive village. Gas mains
burst, explosions are caused and fires are started. Underground railways are wrecked.
Buildings collapse, bridges fall, dams burst, and gaping crevices appear in busy streets. If the
quake strikes at sea, huge tidal waves sweep inland. If it strikes in mountain regions,
avalanches roar down into the valley.
97
CLC/AM/R/05
Consider the terrifying statistics from the past 1755: Lisbon, capital of Portugal - the city
destroyed entirely and 450 killed. 1970: Peru: 50,000 killed. In 1968 an earthquake struck
Alaska. As this is a relatively unpopulated part, only a few people were killed. But it is likely
that this was one of the most powerful quakes ever to have hit the world. Geologists estimate
that during the tremors, the whole of the state moved over 80 feet farther west into the Pacific
Ocean. Imagine the power of something that can move an entire subcontinent! This is the
problem that the scientists face. They are dealing with forces so immense that man cannot
hope to resist them. All that can be done is to try to pinpoint just where the earthquake will
strike and work from there. At least some precautionary measures can then be taken to save
lives and some of the property. Based on the above paragraph, we-arrive at the following
theme sentences for the four paragraphs:
Earthquake - the deadly enemy of mankind.
The above four theme sentences can be developed into the following outline:
Earthquake - the deadly enemy of mankind.
Scientists are trying to find out means to combat earthquakes; they will find
some way to protect themselves from earthquakes.
Quake strikes plains, seas and mountains causing all round destruction.
In 1968, Alaska hit, subcontinent moved 80 feet into the Pacific Ocean.
They can predict the place of origin of the quake so that precaution can be
taken to save man & property
Based on the above outline, we can make the following rough draft:
Earthquake- The Great Destroyer
Earthquake is the mankind's deadly enemy. Earthquake strikes all without a distinction
of nationality or political affiliation. The power of a quake is greater than that of any man-
made weapon of destruction. An earthquake strikes mankind without a warning. A modern
city when struck is reduced -to a nibble. A quake strikes plains, seas and mountains causing
all round destruction. The quake struck Lisbon in 1755 killing 450; Peru in 1970 killing
50,000; Alaska in 1968 moving it 80 feet into the Pacific Ocean. Scientists are trying to find
out means to combat earthquakes, to predict the origin of the quake so that precaution can be
taken to save man and property from destruction.
99
CLC/AM/R/05
100
CLC/AM/R/05
Conclusions.
A report is designed to lead people through the information in a structured way, but
also to enable them to find the information that they want quickly and easily.
Reports usually, therefore, have numbered sections and subsections, and a clear and
full contents page listing each heading. It follows that page numbering is important.
Modern word processors have features to add tables of contents (ToC) and page
numbers as well as styled headings; you should take advantage of these as they update
automatically as you edit your report, moving, adding or deleting sections.
Report Writing
Getting Started: prior preparation and planning
The structure of a report is very important to lead the reader through your thinking to a
course of action and/or decision. It’s worth taking a bit of time to plan it out beforehand.
Step 1: Know your brief
You will usually receive a clear brief for a report, including what you are
studying and for whom the report should be prepared.
First of all, consider your brief very carefully and make sure that you are clear who the
report is for (if you're a student then not just your tutor, but who it is supposed to be written
for), and why you are writing it, as well as what you want the reader to do at the end of
reading: make a decision or agree a recommendation, perhaps.
Step 2: Keep your brief in mind at all times
During your planning and writing, make sure that you keep your brief in mind:
who are you writing for, and why are you writing?
All your thinking need to be focused on that, which may require you to be ruthless in
your reading and thinking. Anything irrelevant should be discarded.
101
CLC/AM/R/05
As you read and research, try to organise your work into sections by theme, a bit like
writing a Literature Review.
Make sure that you keep track of your references, especially for academic work.
Although referencing is perhaps less important in the workplace, it’s also important that you
can substantiate any assertions that you make so it’s helpful to keep track of your sources of
information.
The Structure of a Report
Like the precise content, requirements for structure vary, so do check what’s set out in
any guidance.
However, as a rough guide, you should plan to include at the very least an executive
summary, introduction, the main body of your report, and a section containing your
conclusions and any recommendations.
Executive Summary
The executive summary or abstract, for a scientific report, is a brief summary of the
contents. It’s worth writing this last, when you know the key points to draw out. It should be
no more than half a page to a page in length.
Remember the executive summary is designed to give busy 'executives' a quick
summary of the contents of the report.
Introduction
The Introduction sets out what you plan to say and provides a brief summary of the
problem under discussion. It should also touch briefly on your conclusions.
Report Main Body
The main body of the report should be carefully structured in a way that leads the
reader through the issue.
You should split it into sections using numbered sub-headings relating to themes or
areas for consideration. For each theme, you should aim to set out clearly and concisely the
main issue under discussion and any areas of difficulty or disagreement. It may also include
experimental results. All the information that you present should be related back to the brief
and the precise subject under discussion.
If it’s not relevant, leave it out.
Conclusions and Recommendations
102
CLC/AM/R/05
The conclusion sets out what inferences you draw from the information, including any
experimental results. It may include recommendations, or these may be included in a
separate section.
Recommendations suggest how you think the situation could be improved, and
should be specific, achievable and measurable. If your recommendations have financial
implications, you should set these out clearly, with estimated costs if possibl
LETTER WRITING
A letter is a written message that can be handwritten or printed on paper. It is usually sent to
the recipient via mail or post in an envelope, although this is not a requirement as such. Any
103
CLC/AM/R/05
such message that is transferred via post is a letter, a written conversation between two
parties.
Now that E-mails and texts and other such forms have become the norm for communication,
the art of letter writing has taken a backseat. However, even today a lot of our
communication, especially the formal kind, is done via letters. Whether it is a cover letter for
a job, or the bank sending you a reminder or a college acceptance letter, letters are still an
important mode of communication. In which it is important that we know the intricacies of
letter writing.
Types of Letters
Let us first understand that there are broadly two types of letter, namely Formal Letters, and
Informal Letters. But then there are also a few types of letters based on their contents,
formalities, the purpose of letter writing etc. Let us have a look at the few types of letters.
Formal Letter: These letters follow a certain pattern and formality. They are strictly
kept professional in nature, and directly address the issues concerned. Any type of
business letter or letter to authorities falls within this given category.
Informal Letter: These are personal letters. They need not follow any set pattern or
adhere to any formalities. They contain personal information or are a written
conversation. Informal letters are generally written to friends, acquaintances, relatives
etc.
Official Letter: This type of letter is written to inform offices, branches, subordinates
of official information. It usually relays official information like rules, regulations,
procedures, events, or any other such information. Official letters are also formal in
nature and follow certain structure and decorum.
Social Letter: A personal letter written on the occasion of a special event is known as
a social letter. Congratulatory letter, condolence letter, invitation letter etc are all
social letters.
104
CLC/AM/R/05
Employment Letters: Any letters with respect to the employment process, like
joining letter, promotion letter, application letter etc.
Once you start writing, make sure to get to the point as soon as possible. Especially in formal
letters, it is important to immediately make clear the purpose of the letter.
Be careful of the language
A letter is always supposed to be polite and considerate. Even if it is a complaint letter, the
point must be made in a careful and courteous manner. So it is necessary to use polite
expressions and civil language in all types of letters.
Length of the letter
And the other important factor to be considered is the length of the letter you are writing. It
should be kept in mind that formal letters are generally to the point, precise and short.
105
CLC/AM/R/05
Lengthy formal letters tend to not have the desired effect on the reader. The length of an
informal letter is determined by the message in the letter and the relation to the recipient.
FORMAL LETTER
A formal letter must follow certain rules and conventions. Such a format helps in relaying the
information in a professional way. It must be remembered that there are various such formats
for formal letters that people follow. The one explained here is the one most commonly used
for formal communication these days.
Sender’s Address: The sender’s address is usually put on the top right-hand corner of the page.
The address should be complete and accurate in case the recipient of the letter wishes to get in
touch with the sender for further communication.
Date: The sender’s address is followed by the date just below it, i.e. on the right side of the
page. This is the date on which the letter is being written. It is important in formal letters as they
are often kept on record.
Receiver’s Address: After leaving some space we print the receiver’s address on the left side
of the page. Whether to write “To” above the address depends on the writer’s preference. Make
sure you write the official title/name/position etc., of the receiver, as the first line of the address.
Greeting: This is where you greet the person you are addressing the letter to. Bear in mind that
it is a formal letter, so the greeting must be respectful and not too personal. The general
greetings used in formal letters are “Sir” or “Madam”. If you know the name of the person the
salutation may also be “Mr. XYZ” or “Ms. ABC”. But remember you cannot address them only
by their first name. It must be the full name or only their last name.
Subject: After the salutation/greeting comes the subject of the letter. In the centre of the line
write ‘Subject” followed by a colon. Then we sum up the purpose of writing the letter in one
line. This helps the receiver focus on the subject of the letter in one glance.
Body of the Letter: This is the main content of the letter. It is either divided into three Para or
two Para if the letter is briefer. The purpose of the letter should be made clear in the first
paragraph itself. The tone of the content should be formal. Do not use any flowery language.
Another point to keep in mind is that the letter should be concise and to the point. And always
be respectful and considerate in your language, no matter the subject of your letter.
106
CLC/AM/R/05
Closing the Letter: At the end of your letter, we write a complimentary losing. The words
“Yours Faithfully” or “Yours Sincerely” are printed on the right side of the paper. Generally, we
use the later if the writer knows the name of the person.
Signature: Here finally you sign your name. And then write your name in block letters beneath
the signature. This is how the recipient will know who is sending the letter.
Write a letter to the editor of a daily newspaper complaining about the construction work
on your road in the middle of monsoon season causing inconveniences to the people of
your locality.
From,
XYZ,
To,
The Editor-in-Chief,
Hindustan Times,
Main Street,
Sir,
107
CLC/AM/R/05
Subject: Construction work in our locality during monsoon season causing us difficulties.
Through the medium of your esteemed and respected daily, I wish to inform the municipal
authorities of the difficulties the residents of my locality are facing due to the construction and
repair work currently happening in our area. Monsoon season has started a few days ago and is
compounding our problems.
The repair work has been ongoing for five weeks now and is falling way behind schedule. And
now with the current weather conditions, we are having persistent problems of water logging
and flooding in our area. Another worry is about the accidents that may occur due to the debris
lying around the road. Diseases caused due to waterlogging are another one of our concerns.
Therefore I wish to draw the attention of the concerned authorities with the help of your
newspaper. Hopefully, you will be able to help us in drawing their attention and resolving this
matter at the earliest.
Thanking You,
Your Sincerely,
**signature**
[Mr. XYZ]
INFORMAL LETTER
Informal letters are written to close acquaintances of the writer, their friends, family,
relatives etc. Since they are written to close relations the letters have an informal and personal
tone. Casual language is used while writing informal letters. And sometimes the letters may
even have an emotional undertone.
Informal letters are mainly used for personal communication. So they do not have to
follow any specific pattern, format or conventions. They can be written as per the writer’s
wishes and the requirement of the situation. So the letter is written in a personal fashion in
casual unassuming language.
108
CLC/AM/R/05
As we discussed earlier there is no set format when writing an informal letter. But there
is a general pattern, some conventions that people usually follow. We will be looking at this
pattern and certain tips on how to write effective and attractive informal letters. These can act as
guidelines when you are drafting a letter, they are not hard and fast rules. Let us begin.
Address
The first thing to write is your address, i.e. the address of the writer. We usually write
the address on the left-hand side of the page at the very top. The address should be accurate and
109
CLC/AM/R/05
complete. Even when writing to close friends or relatives the address must be written, so they
can reply back to the letter with ease. If the recipient of the letter is in another country, do not
forget to write your country as well in the address.
Date
Next just below the address we write the date. This allows the reader to have a reference
as to when the address was written. He can then relate better to the contents of the letter.
Greeting
Now since you know the person you are writing to, the greeting can be informal as well.
If it is a friend or someone close to your age you can greet them by their first name, like “Dear
Alex”. If you are writing to your relative like your mother/father/aunt/uncle etc, you may greet
them as such, for example, “Dear Mom”. And if you are writing to an elder person, someone
you respect greatly you can address them as Mr or Mrs. Like say for example you were writing
a congratulatory letter to your teacher, it can be addressed as “Dear Mrs. Alex”.
Introduction Paragraph
And now we begin writing the actual letter. The introductory paragraph sets the tone for
the whole letter. You might begin by asking the recipient about their well being. Or you may say
that you hope the letter finds them in good health and great spirits. The opening of informal
letters should be casual and comforting. It must not be formal and direct as in business letters.
110
CLC/AM/R/05
Lots of Love
Best,
Best Wishes,
Kind Regards,
Kindly,
Pick the one that best suits the occasion and then simply sign your name below the greeting.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
111