Never: Everwhing
Never: Everwhing
.......................................................
7
Recovery ferrous metalsfrom refuse of means money. Here's a look at bow it can be done.
'4
'ft.
v.
4.
i
evenue from municipal solid waste (MSW2 processing plants is derived from sale of output products. Salable products include rem\-rrrd ferrous and non-ferrous metals, glass. am1 otl~rr materials u s r d for fuel, animal-feed constituents, and more. As in all processing systems, percentage recoven, grade of recovered product, per-ton recoven cost, and market demand govern the output product's marketability.
Figure One
Figure Two
.!
A Basic System for Recovery of Ferrous Metallics from Municipal Solid Waste
-..
U'
. I
.. ,
Figure One represents a basic system in which the the shredder's output passes directly under two magnetic drums. Note that these are designed to remove approxllnatel~~ of the ferrous metal-and, in the 95% system fflustratrd, no sizing d e ~ i c is in h e following r the shredder. Figure "wo displays a system that uses both sizing
110
WASTE AGE
JULY 1987
(a trommel) and gravity (nair classifier) on shredder a output, as well as the same magnet configuration , ~vn previously. .;lso shown is another magnet configuration (amagnetic head pulley), farther downstream. This accomplishes additional cleaning of the non-ferrous ia constituents prior to theirf n lseparation. Figure Three A Permanent Magnetic Head Pully Arrangemerit
-
db eo
Magnets used are usually either permanent magnetic u i s or electromagnetic units. Permanent magnets nt need no power, keeping maintenance and operational :sts quite low. Electromagnetics provide an advantage: one can vary magnetic field intensity. Generally, there are three configurations: pulleys,drums, and suspended magnets. Rgures Three through Five show typical respective arrangements; F'gureSix illustrates a variation of the suspended type shown in m e Five. Each of the three magnet configurations is discussed separately below.
i',
magnet assembly mounted insideof a rotating outer cylinder. The drum can be arranged for either overfeed or underfeed. As before, cleated drums provide positive discharge of the product. In the ove7feed method, material is fed onto the drum's top centerline from a relatively uniformly distributed waste bed. Magnetic material either holds to the drum through the magnetic arc's length or deflects sufficiently from the normal path to be taken onto the next processing step. A splitter device assures clean separation. In the underfed armngement., material is donveyed into position near the drum's base. Metals are attracted to the face of the drum, conveyed up and over the top (or deflected horizontally), and discharged ontoa con'veyor. Non-magnetics fall onto another conveyor. Generally, the overfeed anangement nets higher ferrous recovery and more entrapment of nonmagnetic material, e& plastics,papers, textiles, etc., wfiile the underfeed method provides a cleaner ferrous product at the expense of a somewhat lower recovery rate. A t y p i c a l concurrent, doubledrum anangement, shown in F'gure Four, generally results in an even '. cleaner ferrous product
Suspended magnet
These generally are supplied with a cleated belt,and mounted either in-line with or perpendicularto the material flow. h the latter case, t e & referred to as hy cross-belt units.
Figure Five An Inline Maanetie Separator Asngement
Magnetic drum
A magnetic drum usually consists of a stationary
111
Figure Six
f -\
A triplex magnet, a proprietary belt-driven,suspended separator, is itlustrated in Figure Six. This novel arrangement uses multiple magnets arrangedso the metals are agitated both laterally and transversely whde moving through the magnetic field; the -tation reduces the amount of material trapped with the metals. Stainless steel platesmay be installed along the center line of the cleated belt to minimize belt wear.
J
Best return
on investment
Suspended magnets are usually positioned shghtly above and ahead of the pulley delivenng the product. Large pieces of material may occasionally cause jams on cross-belt versions; in-line arrangements are not as susceptible to l h s problem. Attracted metals are lifted from the material flow, carried along the bottom of the cleated belt, and d w charged onto a second conveyor. Non-magnetic matter falls onto another conveyor. A common in-line, suspended arrangement is illustrated in Fgure Five.
Magnetic separation of ferrous metals from MSW is a here today, proven technology. Ithas a long-standmg history of generatlng profits, a resultof experience from applications in ore beneficiation, slag reclamation, automobile shreddmg, and scrap processmg industries. Magnetic separation equipment is generally the least costly of al the equipment needed in a waste processl mg facility. The return on investment for magnetic separators may well be among the m e s t in the entire plant. I
Many people in the field of ash handling have been talking about the advantages of European Style Submerged Orag Conveyorsand their recent introduction to the U.S. market. Beaumont Birch has been designing, manufacturingand installing Submerged Drag Conveyors in America for over 40years. Our first system went into operation in Atlanta, Ga. in 1940 and we have been supplying Submerged Drag Conveyors to American industries and utilities ever since. The advantages to Submerged Drag Conveyors are many. They offer rugged, long lasting components and low maintenance. The water filled trough seals the furnace from air infiltration, the water quenches the ash and the inclined portion automatically dewaters ash. the . The components used in Beaumont Submerged Drag our many years Conveyors have been developed through of experience enabling us to supply you with the b e s t components to suit your individual requirements. Beaumont Birch has over 75 years experience in mechanical, pneumatic and hydraulic ash handling and mechanical coalhandling. For more information ontheBeaumont Submerged Drag Conveyor or any other Beaumont Bulk Material Handling System contact the Beaumont Birch Co