Indian Society Notes Sample
Indian Society Notes Sample
Sample Notes
1. Salient Features of Indian Society
5. Urbanization in India
7. Communalism
8. Regionalism
9. Secularism
Indian society is distinguished for its capacity for tolerance and acceptance, as
well as its social cohesion, which makes it exceptional in its ability to preserve its
culture. The preamble of the constitution places a strong emphasis on the
importance of brotherhood, making it a responsibility that falls on every citizen.
India from ancient times has thrived to create a nationality that is neither
governed by universalism nor by exclusivity to its interest groups. The multi-
cultural conundrum is a salient feature of Indian society that has been a boon and a
bane over the history of the country.
India’s long and sustained civilizations across the ages makes it a unique
society. The very diversity on all accounts from geography to religion to language to
caste to custom to cuisine to ethnicity etc., make it truly vibrant and vivid. Such myriad
magnitudes of diversities pose both challenges and opportunities. Nevertheless, the very
core character of Indianness such as tolerance for pluralism and multiculturalism make it
truly distinct from other civilizations.
India has been the land of immigrants and invaders from across the world which
has resulted in infusion of diverse cultures to this land which in turn made India
an integrated society. It can be seen in terms of its depiction as “salad bowl
model” unlike “melting pot” of the west society. The call of “Vasudhaiv
Kutumbkam”, “Sarva Dharma Sambhavah” and “golden mean” in all dealing make
Indian society most welcoming when there is increasing case of “clash of civilization”
across the globe.
Indian despite a glorious past has now become a “prismatic society” (sandwiched
between traditional and modern). There is simultaneous existence of poverty and
opulence, ascetic spiritualism and filthy materialism. Indian society being in transition
bears impact of external forces like globalization differentially.
Indian society comprises people living in rural, urban, tribal setting and all sections who
carry the ethos of Indianness. As India itself is a multi-colored canvas of multiple
identities, diverse custom, costume, cuisine, color, creed, caste etc., bound by
another “C” called consensus, its societal feature would be filled with
peculiarities.
• Caste System
• Religious Diversity
• Linguistic Diversity
• Ethnic and Racial Diversity
• Orthodoxy/Superstition
• Transitional Society
• Family and Kinship System
• Tribal Society
• Art and Culture
• Geography as a unit of diversity
• Philosophical/ldeological diversity
• Tolerance, love and compassion
• Interdependence
• Unity In Diversity
• The balance between spiritualism and materialism
• The balance between Individualism and collectivism
• Co-existence of traditionalism and modernity
Ironically the term ‘Caste’ itself is not an Indian one, coming from the Portuguese
‘Casta’ meaning, ‘race’ or ‘pure stock’. Indians, themselves, have no single term for
describing the caste system as a whole but use a variety of words referring to different
aspects of it, the two main ones being Varna and Jati.
Characteristics
This system had some characteristic elements, which are as follows:
• The four Varna classification is roughly three thousand years old. However,
the ‘caste system’ stood for different things in different time periods, so that it is
misleading to think of the same system continuing for three thousand years. In its
earliest phase, in the late Vedic period roughly between 900 — 500 BC, the
caste system was really a Varna system and consisted of only four major
divisions. These divisions were not very elaborate or very rigid, and they were not
determined by birth. Movement across the categories seems to have been not
only possible but quite common. It is only in the post Vedic period that caste
became the rigid institution that is familiar to us from well known definitions.
Colonial Times:
• The present form of caste as a social institution has been shaped very
strongly by both the colonial period as well as the rapid changes that have
come about in independent India. Initially, the British administrators began
by trying to understand the complexities of caste in an effort to learn how
to govern the country efficiently. Some of these efforts took the shape of very
methodical and intensive surveys and reports on the ‘customs and manners’ of
various tribes and castes all over the country.
• First begun in the 1860s, the census became a regular ten-yearly exercise
conducted by the British Indian government from 1881 onwards. The 1901
Census under the direction of Herbert Risley was particularly important as
it sought to collect information on the social hierarchy of caste -i.e., the
Download Full
Notes
Click Here
• Indian Independence in 1947 marked a big, but ultimately only partial break with
the colonial past. In pre-independence period Caste considerations had
inevitably played a role in the mass mobilisations of the nationalist
movement. Efforts to organise the “depressed classes” initiative taken from
both ends of the caste spectrum – by upper caste progressive reformers as well
as by members of the lower castes such as Mahatma Jotiba Phule and
Babasaheb Ambedkar in western India, Ayyankali, Sri Narayana Guru,
lyotheedass and Periyar (E. V . Ramaswamy Naickar) in the South.
Both Mahatma Gandhi and Babasaheb Ambedkar began organising protests
against untouchability from the 1920s onwards. Anti-untouchability
programmes became a significant part of the Congress agenda so that, by the
time Independence was on the horizon, there was a broad agreement across the
spectrum of the nationalist movement to abolish caste distinctions. The dominant
view in the nationalist movement was to treat caste as a social evil and as a
colonial ploy to divide Indians. But the nationalist leaders, above all, Mahatma
Gandhi, were able to simultaneously work for the upliftment of the lowest castes,
advocate the abolition of untouchability and other caste restrictions, and, at the
same time, reassure the landowning upper castes that their interests, too, would
be looked after.
• The post-Independence Indian state inherited and reflected these contradictions.
On the one hand, the state was committed to the abolition of caste and explicitly
wrote this into the Constitution. On the other hand, the state was both unable and
unwilling to push through radical reforms which would have undermined the
economic basis for caste inequality. At yet another level, the state assumed that if
it operated in a caste-blind manner, this would automatically lead to the
undermining of caste based privileges and the eventual abolition of the institution.
For example, appointments to government jobs took no account of caste, thus
leaving the well-educated upper castes and the ill-educated or often illiterate
lower castes to compete on “equal” terms. The only exception to this was in the
form of reservations for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. In other
words, in the decades immediately after Independence, the state did not make
Jajmani System
• India has a remarkable tradition of inter-dependence which has kept it united for
centuries. And , this is despite the fact that ours is a caste ridden society where
there are practices of societal stratification. Such example is the Jajmani System
or functional interdependence of various castes. Jajman or Yajman is the
recipient of certain services. Jajmani system is an socio-economic and
ritual arrangement in which one caste secures the service of another caste.
This system initially developed in the villages between the food producing
families and the families which supported them with other goods and services.
• The entire gamut of social order developed with Jajmani links with multiple
types of payments and obligations. None of the caste was self sufficient and it
depended for many things on other castes. Thus, each caste worked as a
functional group and was linked with other caste via the mechanisms of Jajmani
system.
• Though Jajmani system represented the inter-linking of Hindu caste yet, in
practice this system crossed the boundary of religion and provided linkages
between different religions also. For example, Hindu’s dependence on Muslim
weaver or washer man or Muslim’s dependence on Hindu trader / tailor /
Goldsmith etc. is a manifestation of that mechanism only, though not called so.
• However, various development like westernization, Globalisation, dilution of caste
system, expansion of education and in turn employment have metamorphed
Jajmani system transcending the traditional base of interdependence.
Functions of Jajmani system
• Exploitation: Jajmani system has been a tool for exploitation in some society
due to its restrictive nature. The kamin is used as a worker in landlord’s family
and they are made to perform degraded jobs. The system has given rise to
problems such as bonded labourers.
• Social boundations: The Jajmani system puts boundations on people of a
particular caste from venturing into other occupation. In addition, the descendent
of a caste is made to perform the same duty regardless of the situation. In
addition, the Kamin cannot provide services to people other than the Jajman.
Dominant Caste
• ‘Dominant caste’ is a term used to refer to those castes which had a large
population and were granted landrights by the partial land reforms effected
after Independence. The land reforms took away rights from the erstwhile
claimants, the upper castes who were ‘absentee landlords’ in the sense that they
played no part in the agricultural economy other than claiming their rent. They
frequently did not live in the village either, but were based in towns and cities.
• These land rights now came to be vested in the next layer of claimants, those
who were involved in the management of agriculture but were not themselves the
cultivators. These intermediate castes in turn depended on the labour of the
lower castes including specially the ‘untouchable’ castes for tilling and tending the
land.
• However, once they got land rights, they acquired considerable economic power.
Their large numbers also gave them political power in the era of electoral
democracy based on universal adult franchise. Thus, these intermediate castes
became the ‘dominant’ castes in the country side and played a decisive role
in regional politics and the agrarian economy. Examples of such dominant
castes include the Yadavs of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, the Vokkaligas of
Contemporary Trends
The caste system in its attempts to adjust itself to the changed conditions of life,
in the present times has assumed new roles. Besides, industrialization and
urbanization, other factors such as Westernization, Sanskritisation, reorganization
of Indian states, spread of education, socio-religious reforms, spatial and
occupational mobility and growth of market economy have greatly affected the
caste system.
Religious Diversity
In a general sense religion is a set of beliefs, feelings, dogmas and practices that define
the relations between human being and the sacred or divinity. India, over the centuries,
has witnessed the evolution of a number of religious tenets and people of various faiths
from across the world have made it their homeland. Thus, it is a quintessential land of
religious diversity where almost all the major religions of the world are practiced by their
respective followers.
Among the major religions in India are: Hinduism, Islam Christianity, Sikhism, Buddhism
and Jainism. Zoroastrianism, Judaism and Bahaism are the religions with lesser
following. At the same time the country is home to several indigenous faiths which have
survived the influence of major religions for centuries and are holding the ground firmly.
Regional con-existence of diverse religious groups in the country makes it really unique.
The Constitution of India recognizes the religious diversity of India and thus proclaims it
to be a secular republic, guaranteeing freedom of practice and propagation of religion to
all its citizens without any distinction.
However, this religious diversity has posed constant challenges to the country in form of
communalism and communal violence. Beginning during the British period,
communalism is one of the greatest challenges to the country’s unity.
Language is one of the principal powerful symbols of identity in India. States in the
Indian Union are demarcated on the basis of the principal language spoken. People are
identified with certain linguistic, ethnic, religious or cultural groups through ones mother
tongue. Moreover, language has been basis for many of the ethnic movements in the
country.
This linguistic diversity , however, poses a lot of challenges which keep surfacing in the
form of demand of new sates based on language, regionalism, linguistic chauvinism and
prominently Hindi has been found to be the eye of storm since Independence.
Ethnic Conflicts
Racial Diversity
A race is a group of people with a set of distinctive physical features such as skin colour,
type of nose, form of hair, etc. Prominent racial types in India are :
• Negrito: Negritos are the people who belong to the black racial stock as found in
Africa. In India some of the tribes in South India, such as the Kadar, and the
Paniyan.
• Proto-Australoids: Consist of an ethnic group, which includes the Australian
aborigines and other peoples of southern Asia and Pacific Islands. Some of these
tribes are the Ho of Singhbhum, Jharkhand and the Bhil of the Vindhya ranges,
MP.
• Mongoloid: are a major racial stock native to Asia, including the peoples of
northern and eastern Asia. In India, the North Eastern regions have tribes of
Mongoloid strain.
• Nordic: belong to the physical type characterized by tall stature, long head, light
skin and hair, and blue eyes. In India, they are found in different parts of north of
the country, especially in Punjab and Rajputana.
All such racial differentials have implication in terms collective identity which is asserted
to have hand on “political pie”. This in turn does create conflict, however, race based
conflict is not so stark. Nevertheless, episode of Nido Tania, a resident of Arunachal
Pradesh beaten to death in Delhi on account of racial outrage, puts Article 15 of Indian
constitution in poor light. Bezbaruah committee constituted thereafter for assessing the
problems of North Easterns vis a vis such racial discrimination is a positive move.
The flip side of such orthodoxy or superstition is discrimination with women, disables,
few animals, conflict in society, clash of religion and even personal harm owing to
practice of old rituals.
Women are alleged to be witch, omen in rural areas which in many cases become
reason for their ostracization from the village and even misbehavior, naked parade ,
violence against them.
Also, desire for son child, who is believed to be performing rites for his parents, also put
girl child at margin, so the practice of female infanticide, female feticide and a gamut of
discrimination, subjugation perpetuated to women which is reflected in neglect for their
education, health etc.
Transitional Society
India is called a “prismatic society” or a society in transition which is undergoing a lot of
change. Here, there is confluence of modernity as well as primordial values. It is a
developing society where modern values like secularism, value pluralism etc. as well as
traditional values based on caste, language, region, religion are coexisting.
Here, democracy based on popular election having ethos of people as sovereign as well
as institutions like “khap panchayat’’ exist together. Such heterogeneity add diversity to
Indian life. Nevertheless, India is moving fast with modern values which have regard for
human rights, respect for women, equality, socioeconomic justice etc. The Industrialized
part of the country has elements and values derived from the west, and hence
appreciation for globalization and exchange of civilzational values, whereas Agrarian
society being diffused and inward looking does not appreciate the external values.
However, there is invariable existence of both society.
In the industrial society the family is limited to husband, wife and their children which is
referred as “nuclear family”.
Characteristics of Family
The Family has the following features:
• Universality
• Social environment which Influence the Individual’s early life.
• Affective basis, emotionality
• Limited size
• Central position in social structure
• Sense of responsibility among the members.
• Social regulation of behavior.
• With regard to the rule of residence, some societies are matrilocal in their
marriage and family customs while others are patrilocal. In the first case, the
newly married couple stays with the woman’s parents, whereas in the second
case the couple lives with the man’s parents.
• With regard to the rules of inheritance, matrilineal societies pass on property from
mother to daughter while patrilineal societies do so from father to son.
• With regards to authority and dominance: A patriarchal family structure exists
where the men exercise authority and dominance, and matriarchy where the
women play a similarly dominant role. However, matriarchy – unlike patriarchy –
has been a theoretical rather than an empirical concept. There is no historical or
anthropological evidence of matriarchy – i.e., societies where women exercise
dominance. However, there do exist matrilineal societies, i.e., societies where
women inherit property from their mothers but do not exercise control over it, nor
are they the decision makers in public affairs.
• Feminisation of work: Today many couples are working in service sectors like
in banking and insurance find very little time for child care. In such cases old
parents take care of children
• Increasing Cost of Living in Urban Areas: With problem of finding
accommodation and limited space available for living in cities, similarly, rising
cost of living in urban areas especially in slums force the people to share
residence among other family members.
• Resilience in Joint Family Ideology: Families which have migrated to cities still
retain their bonds to joint family in village and town. This is evident from the
physical presence of relatives at a time of events like birth, marriage, death,
illness. Sometimes members of the families living in cities go to the village for
these events. The joint family ethic is very much evident in the performance of
certain role obligations. A family in the city has the duty to give shelter to all
immigrants from the rural family, (Young men in pursuit of education or work, or
relatives seeking medical treatment).
• Industrialization: Industrialization serves to strengthen the joint family because
an economic base has been provided to support it because more hands are
needed in a renewed family enterprise or because kin can help one another in
the striving for upward mobility. Similarly, joint families continue to be the norm
among industrial entrepreneurs.
No clear cut distinction between the family of No member from ego’s family of orientation (i.e. of father,
birth (i.e family of orientation) and family of mother, brother and sister) can also become a member of his
marriage (i.e family of procreation) family of marriage; but this is possible in the south
Bride giver-inferior to bride takers Bride giver is at similar level with bride taker
Tribal Society
Among the diversified population a significant portion is comprised of the tribal people,
the original inhabitants of the land. The tribal culture of India and their traditions and
practices pervade almost all of the aspects of Indian culture and civilization. Tribal
people in India are called Adivasi. Adivasi is an umbrella term for a heterogeneous set of
ethnic and tribal groups considered the “aboriginal “population of India. Although terms
such as vanavasi (“forest dwellers”), or girijan (“hill people”) are also used for the tribes
of India, Adivasi carries the specific meaning of being the original.
• Definite Common Topography: Tribal people live within a definite topography and
it is a common place for all the members of a particular tribe occupying that
region. In absence of a common but definite living place, the tribals will lose other
characteristics of a tribal life, like common language, way of living and community
sentiment etc.
• Sense of Unity: Sense of unity is an invariable necessity for a true tribal life. The
very depends upon the tribal’s sense of unity during the times of peace and war.
• Endogamous Group: Tribal people generally do not marry outside their tribe and
marriage within the tribe is highly appreciated and much applauded
• Common Dialect: Members of a tribe exchange their views in a common dialect.
This element further strengthens their sense of unity.
• Ties of Blood-relationship: Blood-relation is the greatest bond and most powerful
force inculcating sense of unity among the tribals.
• Protection Awareness: Tribal people always need protection from intrusion and
infiltration and for this a single political authority is established and all the powers
are vested in this authority.
• Common Culture: Common culture of a tribe springs out from the sense of unity,
common language, common religion, common political organization.
• Importance of Kinship: Kinship forms the basis of tribal social organization. Most
tribes are divided into exogamous clans and lineages. The marriage among
tribals is based on the rule of tribal endogamy. Marriage is viewed as a contract
and there are no prohibition on divorce and remarriage.
• Egalitarian Values: There are no institutionalized inequalities like the caste
system or sex based inequalities. Thus men and women enjoyed equal status
and freedom. However, some degrees of social inequality may be found in case
of tribal chiefs or tribal kings who enjoy a higher social status, exercise political
power and posses wealth.
• Rudimentary Religion: Tribes believe in certain myths and a rudimentary type of
religion
Indian Music
The best example of India’s composite culture is our music , particularly the Hindustani
Classical Music . It has ancient origins, yet emergence of a highly developed and
enriched music of northern India could not have been possible without Muslim
contributions and its patronage. Emergences of Khayal from Dhrupad, Tabla from
Pakhawaj / Mridangam are some of the key examples. Indian Veena and Persian
Tambura merged to emerge as Sitar. Similarly, Ghazals and Qawwalis have played a
unifying factor among the people of Indian sub-continent.
Painting
Coming from nook and corner portraying the lives of people ranging from court to tribal
to local folklore depict the richness, diverseness and idiosyncrasies of Indian
sociocultural lives. Madhubani, Manjusha paintings of Bihar to Rajput painting of
Rajsthan to Thanjavur painting of chola empire etc. portray life style, famous act,
practices etc of the respective regions.
Similarly, Puppetry, Theatre, Nukkad- Natak, Circus etc . being performed in various part
of corner have their important role reflecting diverse way of Indian life.
All these texts portray the diverse socioeconomic, cultural and political set up as pwer
their own geographical and historical set up.
Despite of this diversity, India has been defined as a distinct geographical unit since
ages. A sloka in Vishnu Purana defines Bharata as the land which is south of snowy
mountains and north of ocean. The country was time and again unified by different
imperialist forces taking into consideration its geographical distinctness.
Philosophical/Ideological Diversity
Indian philosophy, the systems of thought and reflection that were developed by the
civilizations of the Indian subcontinent. They include both orthodox (astika) systems,
namely, the Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva-Mimamsa (or Mimamsa), and
Vedanta schools of philosophy, and unorthodox (nastika) systems, such as Buddhism
and Jainism.
Indian thought has been concerned with various philosophical problems, significant
among which are the nature of the world (cosmology), the nature of reality
(metaphysics), logic, the nature of knowledge (epistemology), ethics, and the philosophy
of religion. Such philosophical diversity has given way for tolerance, righteousness, love,
recognition of various differences, Vasudhaiv kutumbkam and sarva dharma sambhavah
like notions.
This is well reflected in our soft power diplomacy and good will at global level..
Coexistence of Indian society despite of innumerable fundamental differences can be
owed to only such ideological resilience.
Interdependence
India has a remarkable tradition of inter-dependence which has kept it united for
centuries. And, this is despite the fact that ours is a caste ridden society where there are
practices of societal stratification. Such example is the Jajmani System or functional
interdependence of various castes. Jajman or Yajman is the recipient of certain services.
This system initially developed in the villages between the food producing families and
the families which supported them with other goods and services.
The entire gamut of social order developed with Jajmani links with multiple types of
payments and obligations. None of the caste was self sufficient and it depended for
many things on other castes. Thus, each caste worked as a functional group and was
linked with other caste via the mechanisms of Jajmani system.
Though Jajmani system represented the inter-linking of Hindu caste yet, in practice this
system crossed the boundary of religion and provided linkages between different
religions also. For example, Hindu’s dependence on Muslim weaver or washer man or
Muslim’s dependence on Hindu trader / tailor / Goldsmith etc. is a manifestation of that
mechanism only, though not called so. However, various development like
westernization, globalization, dilution of caste system, expansion of education and in
turn employment have metamorphed Jajmani system transcending the traditional base
of interdependence.
Unity in Diversity
As we have just seen in the foregoing discussion that India is a land of diversity (i.e.
variety of races, of religions, of languages, of castes and of cultures). However, despite
such variety it exhibits a sense of oneness, a sense of weness which holds the members
of the society together. This has earned it the moniker “Unity in Diversity”. The Indian
society has bonds of unity underlying all this diversity located in a certain underlying
uniformity of life as well as in certain mechanisms of integration. Around the world this
diversity gets accommodated in 3 ways. Let’s discuss some of the bonds of unity of the
Indian society.
• Despite this diversity, India has been defined as a distinct geographical unit since
ages. A sloka in Vishnu Purana defines Bharata as the land which is south of
snowy mountains and north of ocean. The country was time and again unified by
different imperialist forces taking into consideration its geographical distinctness.
Geography as a Source of Conflict:
• Geography in itself does not act as a divisive element. However, when combined
with the ideology of aggressive regionalism, it will act as a divisive factor. For
example, son of the soil movement in maharastra is targeted towards people of
particular region.
• Indian philosophy, the systems of thought and reflection that were developed by
the civilizations of the Indian subcontinent. They include both orthodox (astika)
systems, namely, the Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva-Mimamsa (or
Mimamsa), and Vedanta schools of philosophy, and unorthodox (nastika)
systems, such as Buddhism and Jainism. Indian thought has been concerned
with various philosophical problems, significant among which are the nature of
the world (cosmology), the nature of reality (metaphysics), logic, the nature of
knowledge (epistemology), ethics, and the philosophy of religion.
Ideology as a Source of Unity:
• Such philosophical diversity has given way for tolerance, righteousness, love,
recognition of various differences, Vasudhaiv kutumbkam and sarva dharma
sambhavah like notions.
• This is well reflected in our soft power diplomacy and good will at global level.
Coexistence of Indian society despite of innumerable fundamental differences
can be owed to only such ideological resilience.
Ideology as a Source of Conflict:
• India has no state religion, it is a secular state. It is the land where almost all the
major religions of the world are practiced by their respective followers.
Nevertheless the religious diversity has been a major source of disunity and
disharmony in the country. This is because in India religious affiliation appears to
be overemphasized and many a time people seem to forget the national unity
and express their loyalty more towards their own religion.
Religion as a Source of Unity:
• Every religion when interpreted in liberal form preaches Religious pluralism and
Tolerance, Love and Compassion. Tolerance, the ability or willingness to tolerate
the existence of opinions or behaviour that one dislikes or disagrees with, has
been one of the prime reasons for sustenance and continuity in the Indian society
over the millennia. This tolerance was coupled by love and compassion, for both
the humans and animals, as preached by some the religions that evolved on its
land, especially Buddhism and Jainism. Ashoka, the Mauryan King, preached
tolerance towards people of all religion and forsook war in the 3rd century BC.
• He was followed by other tolerant kings like Samudragupta and Harshvardhana.
During the Medieval ages the Bhaktj and Sufi saints preached tolerance, love and
compassion. Akbar, the Mughal ruler of the 16th century, also deserves mention
for his tolerance for people of all religion. Thus, the present Indian society is a
result of ages of tolerance, love and compassion among the people, who lived
and made this country their homeland.
Religion as a Source of Conflict
• However, this religious diversity has posed constant challenges to the country in
the form of communalism and communal violence. Beginning during the British
period, communalism is one of the greatest challenges to the country’s unity. This
has ultimately led to Partition of our country due to the development of the two
nation theory.