1

SCHOOL OF LEGAL STUDIES

CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR

SEMESTER BASED SYLLABUS FOR

MASTER OF LAWS (LL.M)

EFFECTIVE FROM 2012

 2

SCHEME AND SYLLABI OF DEGREE OF MASTER IN LAWS

There shall be the following course of study for LL.M First, Second, Third and Fourth
Semesters. In the First Semester there shall be two foundation courses and in Semesters II
and III there will be one foundation course in each. Third Semester shall comprise three
papers and one paper shall consist of Project Work. Last semester shall include teaching
practice and dissertation.
The break-up of the papers along with the credits and marks is given as under;

Foundation courses
1. Law and Social Transformation in India
2. Indian Constitutional Law: The New Challenges
3. Legal Education and Research Methodology
4. Judicial Process (Role of Judiciary in Criminal Procedure)
5. Internship
6. Dissertation
Group I
Criminal Justice System

1. Penal Laws and Theorization of Deviant Behaviour

2. Jurisprudence of punishment
3. Comparative Substantive Criminal Law
4. Comparative Perspectives of Criminal Procedure Law
5. Juvenile Justice System
6. Police & Criminal Justice System
7. Evidentiary Issues Relating to the Use of Modern Technology & Forensic in Criminal
Trials

Group II
Business Law
1. Law of Industrial and Intellectual Property
2. Legal Regulation of Economic Enterprises
3. Law of Export - Import Regulation
4. Banking Law
5. Insurance Law
6. Corporate Finance
7. Corporate Governance and Business Responsibility
 3

Group - I
First Semester
Course Code Subject Credits Total marks 100
Internal External
LLM-C101 Law and Social Transformation in India* 04 40 60
LLM-C102 Indian Constitutional Law: The New Challenges* 04 40 60
LLM-E101 Penal Laws and Theorization of Deviant Behaviour 04 40 60
LLM-E102 Jurisprudence of Punishment 04 40 60
Second Semester
LLM-C201 Legal Education and Research Methodology* 04 40 60
LLM-E201 Comparative Substantive Criminal Law 04 40 60
LLM-E202 Comparative Perspectives of Criminal Procedure 04 40 60
Law
LLM-E203 Juvenile Justice System 04 40 60

Third Semester
LLM-C301 Judicial Process* 04 40 60
(Role of Judiciary in Criminal Procedure)
LLM-C302 Project Work 04 40 (Presentation)
60 (Project Report)
LLM-E301 Police and Criminal Justice System 04 40 60
LLM-E302 Evidentiary Issues Relating to Modern 04 40 60
Technological Forensic in Criminal Trials

Fourth semester
Paper I Internship (Teaching Assignment) 08 Total Marks 200
Paper II Dissertation 08 Total Marks 200***

* Foundation Courses
** 40% marks will be allocated to the feedback and 60% marks will be awarded on the

basis of teaching material.

*** 75% marks are allocated for evaluation of Dissertation and 25% marks for viva-voice
of Dissertation.
 4

Group - II
First Semester
Paper Subject Credits Total marks 100
Internal External
Paper I Law and Social Transformation in India* 04 40 60
Paper II Indian Constitutional Law: The New Challenges* 04 40 60
Paper III Law of Industrial and Intellectual Property 04 40 60
Paper IV Legal Regulation of Economic Enterprises 04 40 60
Second Semester
Paper I Legal Education and Research Methodology * 04 40 60
Paper II Judicial Process* 04 40 60
Paper III Law of Export - Import Regulation 04 40 60
Paper IV Banking Law 04 40 60
Third Semester
Paper I Insurance Laws 04 40 60
Paper II Corporate Finance 04 40 60
Paper III Corporate Governance and Business
Responsibility 04 40 60
Paper IV Project Work 04 60(Project Report),
40 ( Presentation)

Fourth semester
Paper I Internship 08 Total Marks 200
Paper II Dissertation 08 Total Marks 200

* Foundation Courses
** 40% marks will be allocated to the feedback and 60% marks will be awarded on the

basis of teching material.

*** 75% marks are allocated for evaluation of Dissertation and 25% marks for viva-voice
of Dissertation.
 5

Group- I
FIRST SEMESTER
There are four papers in semester one with 4 credits and 100 marks each (4x4=16 credits &
4x100=400 marks). Two of the four papers are foundation courses and the other two are
optional courses. Every paper will compromise of 8 questions spread over four parts. Every part
will comprise of two questions. A candidate shall have to attempt one question from each part.

Course Code: LLM-C101

Law and Social Transformation in India
Objective of the course:
This course is designed to offer the teacher and the taught an opportunity to discuss, explore and
analyze the issues regarding;
a) Indian approaches to social and economic problems in the context of law as a means of
social control and change; and
b) Law and legal institutions as a means to achieve development within the framework of
law.
The basic endeavour is to make the students aware of the role law has played and has to play in
the contemporary Indian society.

Unit 1: Law and Public Opinion

a) Law as the product of traditions and culture
b) Law as an instrument of social change
c) Caste disabilities, Child Marriage and Sati
d) Criticism and evaluation in the light of colonization and the introduction of common law
system and institutions in India and its impact on further development of law and legal
institutions in India.
Unit 2: Religion and the Law
a) Religion as a divisive factor and secularism as a solution to the problem
b) Problems in reforming law on secular lines
c) Freedom of religion and non-discrimination on the basis of religion
d) Religious minorities and the law
Unit 3: Community and the Law
a) Constitutional guarantee of equality before law
b) Protective discrimination: Scheduled castes, tribes and backward classes
c) Empowerment of women: Constitutional and other legal provisions
d) Problems related to children (adoption, child labour and sexual exploitation): Legal
provisions
 6

Unit 4: Modernisation and the Law

a) Modernisation as a value: Constitutional perspectives reflected in the fundamental
duties
b) Modernisation of social institutions through law
c) Criminal law: Plea bargaining; compounding and payment of compensation to victims

Select Bibliography:
 D.D. Basu, Constitution of India, Prentice-Hall of India (P) Ltd., 1996.
 Duncan Derret, The State, Religion and Law in India, OUP, New Delhi, 1999.
 Flavia Agnes, Law and Gender Inequality: The Politics of Women’s Rights in India,
Oxford, 1999.
 Freedman, Law in Changing Society, 1959.
 H.M. Seervai, Constitutional Law of India, Tripathi, 1996.
 Indian Law Institute, Law and Social Change: Indo-American Reflections, Tripathi
Publications, 1988.
 Julius Stone, Social Dimension of Law and Justice,
 Marc Galanter (ed.), Law and Society in Modern India, Oxford, 1997.
 Robert Lingat, The Classical Law of India, Oxford, 1998.
 Savitri Gunasekhare, Children, Law and Justice, Sage Publications, 1997.
 Sunil Deshta and Kiran Deshta, Law and Menace of Child Labour, Anmol Publications,
2000.
 Upendra Baxi, The Crisis of the Indian Legal System, Vikas Publications, 1982.
 A.V.Dicey, Law and Public Opinion in 19th Century England.
 Morris Ginsberg, Law and Public Opinion in 20th Century England.
 P. Ishwar Bhatt, Law and Social Transformation, Eastern Book Company, Lucknow,
2008.
 Stones, Social Dimensions of Law and Justice.

********
 7

Course Code: LLM-C102

Indian Constitutional Law: The New Challenges

Objective of the course:

The Constitution, a living document, is said to be always in the making. The judicial process of
constitutional interpretation involves a technique of adapting the law to meet changing social
mores. Constitution being the fundamental law, an insight into its new trends is essential for a
meaningful understanding of the legal system and processes. The post graduate students in law,
who had the basic knowledge of Indian Constitutional Law at LL.B. level, shall be exposed to
the new challenges and perspectives of constitutional developments.

Unit 1: Federalism

a) Creation of new states

b) Allocation and share of resources – distribution of grants in aid
c) The inter-state disputes on resources
d) Rehabilitation of internally displaced persons
e) Centre‟s responsibility and internal disturbance within states
f) Directions of the centre to the state under Articles 356 and 365
g) Federal comity – relationship of trust and faith between centre and state
h) Special status of certain states

Unit 2: Emerging regime of new rights and remedies

a) Freedom of speech and right to broadcast and telecast
b) Right to strikes, hartal, and bandh
c) Reading Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties as Fundamental Rights
d) Right to education; Commercialization of education and its impact; and Brain drain by
foreign education market
Unit 3: Separation of Powers: Stresses and strain
a) Judicial activism, judicial restraint and judicial independence
b) Appointment, transfer and removal of judges
c) Accountability of executive and judiciary
d) Implementation of Public-interest litigation
e) Tribunals

Unit 4: Democratic Process

a) Nexus of politics with criminals and the business
b) Election: Status of election commission, electoral reforms
c) Coalition government: „stability, durability, and corrupt practice‟
d) Grass root democracy
Select Bibliography:
 8

No specific bibliography is suggested for this course since the course materials obviously depend
upon the latest developments. These developments in the areas specified in the course can be
gathered from the recent materials such as case law, changes and amendments of laws, critical
comments, studies and reports, articles and research papers and lastly contemporary emerging
ethos impacting on constitutional values. However, the following books are recommended: -
 D.D. Basu, Constitutional Law of India, 1991.
 H.M. Seervai, Constitutional Law of India, 1996.
 M. Hidayatullah, Constitutional Law of India, Bar Council of India Trust, 1989.
 M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law, 2003.
 S.G. Mishra, Constitutional Law of India, 1993.

********
 9

Course Code:LLM-E101:
Penal Laws and Theorizations of Deviant Behaviour

Objectives:

Unit 1: Concept of Crime/Deviance and Criminal Justice System

a) Crimes in primitive, medieval and Kingship/State organized societies
b) Consensus and Conflict Perspectives in Crime
c) Philosophical/Rational versus Historical/Contextual Approaches to Crimes

Unit 2: Prominent Criminological Thought Currents

a) Pre-classicalism
b) Classicalism
c) Positivism
d) Radicalism
e) Neo-classicalism
Unit 3: Classifications of Crime in Traditional and Modern Societies
a) Protection of Traditional interests by Criminal Law
-Bodily interest
-Property interest
-State and Religion
-Social institutions and Traditions
b) Power and Crime
c) Gender and Crime

Unit 4: Special Forms of Modern Criminalities-Upper Class/Privileged Class Deviance

a) Corruption
b) Drug and Human Trafficking Trade
c) Food Adulteration and Black-marketing in Essential Commodities
d) Professional Malpractices

Selected Bibliography:
 Alan Norrie, Crime, Reason and History, (1993), Weidenfeld Anderson Nicholson,
England.
 H.S. Beeker, Outsiders; The Studies in Sociology of Deviance Series, (1966).
 Upendra Baxi, Crisis of Indian Legal System.
 Upendra Baxi, Liberty and Corruption: The …………… and Beyound, EBC (1989)
 A.R.Desai, Violation of Democratic Rights in India (1986)
 Mehraj Uddin, Socio-Legal Dimensions of Drug Addiction.
 10

 Taylor, Walton and Yonng, New Criminology, Routledge Kagen Paul, U.K.
 Ahmad Siddique‟s, Criminolgy, Eastern Book Company,
 Pande, B.B., “Privileged Class Deviance-Nature and Dimensions” in K.S.Shukla (Et.),
The Other side of Development (1987), Sage India
 Steven Box, Law,Crime and Mystification, Tevistok Publictions London (1983)
 11

Course Code:LLM-E102
Jurisprudence of Punishment

Objective of the course:

This course offers a specialist understanding of criminal policies including theories of
punishment, their supposed philosophical and sociological justifications and the problematic of
discretion in the sentencing experience of the „developing‟ societies, a focus normally absent in
law curricula so far.
The expert work of the U.N. Committee on Crime Prevention and Treatment of Offenders will
be availed of in this course. Especially, at each stage, the three „D‟s will be explored as offering
a range of alternatives: decriminalization, dependization, and deinstitutionalization.

Unit 1: Jurisprudential Issues and Theories of Punishment

a) Trancendentalists versus Utilitarians
b) Kelsonites versus Benthamites
c) Retribution
- Limiting Retributivists
- Rule Retributivists
d) Deterence-General Deterence and Specific Deterence
e) Incapicitation: Behavior Prevention
f) Reformation and Rehabilitation
g) Traditional Hindu and Islamic Approaches- Expiation and Atonement
h) Western Ideas of Restorative Justice or Braithwastes „Reintegrative Shaming‟
Unit 2: Legislative and Judicial Regulation of Punishment/Sentencing
a) Right to Pre-sentence hearing U/S 235(2) and 248(2) Cr.P.C.
b) Limited Legislative Guidance on Sentencing -Maximum provided for a majority of
offences- For few offences minimum also provided- for a few graded sentence provided
c) Sentencing accords a wide discretion to judiciary without any kind of guidelines
– Sentencing disparity
– Subjective, judge-centric sentencing
d) Simple Imprisonment, rigorous imprisonment and life imprisonment
Unit 3: Prison as an Agency of Punishment
a) Prison as a system
b) History and evolution of Indian Prisons
c) Prisoners rights and duties
d) Prison Reforms

Unit4: Special Forms of Punishment/Sentencing

A. Probation
a) Probation under the Probation of Offenders Act 1958- Sections 3,4,6 &12
b) Probation under Cr.P.C.- Sections 360, 361, 256E(a) & (b)
c) Probation and Judicial Process
B. Death Penalty
a) Trend of Abolition world over
 12

b) Retentionist Countries use it as a „rarest of rare‟ sentence

c) Death Penalty and Judicial Process

Select Bibliography:
 H.L.A. Hart, Punishment and Responsibility, 1968.
 Herbert L. Packer, The Limits of Criminal Sanction, 1968.
 S. Chhabbra, The Quantum of Punishment in Criminal Law, 1970.
 Siddique, Criminology, Eastern: Lucknow, 1984.
 Andrew Ashworth, The Sentencing Function, OUP (2010)
 Nigel walker, Sentencing-Theory and Practice, Butterworths London,1996
 Nigel walker, Sentencing in a Rational Society, 1972
 Mehraj Uddin, Crime and Criminal Justice System in India, 1984

********
 13

SECOND SEMESTER
Every paper will compromise of 8 questions spread over four parts. Every part will comprise of
two questions. A candidate shall have to attempt one question from each part.

Course Code: LLM-C201

LEGAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Objectives of the course:

A post-graduate student of law should get an insight into the objectives of legal education. He
should have an exposure to programmes like organisation of seminars, publication of law
journals and holding of legal aid clinics.
Law is taught in different ways in different countries. The LL.M course, being intended also to
produce lawyers with better competence and expertise, it is imperative that the student should
familiarise himself with the different systems of legal education. The lecture method both at
LL.B level and LL.M level has many demerits. The existing lacunae can be eliminated by
following other methods of learning such as case methods, problem method, discussion method,
seminar method and a combination of all these methods. The student has to be exposed to these
methods so as to develop his skills.
Growth of legal science in India depends on the nature and career of legal research. The syllabus
is designed to develop also skills in research and writing in a systematic manner.

Unit 1 Research Methods

a) Socio-legal research
b) Doctrinal and non-doctrinal
c) Relevance of empirical research
d) Induction and deduction

Unit 2 Identification of Research Problem

a) Meaning of research problem
b) Review of literature and bibliographical research
c) Legislative materials including subordinate legislation notification and policy
statements
d) Decisional materials including foreign decisions; methods of discovering the “rule of
the case” tracing the history of important cases and ensuring that these have not been
over-ruled; discovering judicial conflict in the area pertaining to the research problem and
the reasons thereof
e) Juristic writings: A survey of juristic literature relevant to select problems in India and
foreign periodicals
f) Compilation of list of reports or special studies conducted relevant to the problem

Unit 3 Preparation of the Research Design

a) Formulation of the research problem
 14

b) Devising tools and techniques for collection of data: Methodology

c) Methods for the collection of statutory and case materials and juristic literature
d) Use of historical and comparative research materials
e) Use of observation studies
f) Use of questionnaires/interview schedules
g) Use of case studies
h) Sampling procedures: Design of sample, types of sampling to be adopted
i) Use of scaling techniques
j) Jurimetrics

Unit 4 Processing and classification of Data

a) Rules for tabulation
b) Explanation of tabulated data
c) Analysis of data

Bibliography:
 High Brayal, Nigel Dunean and Richard Crimes, Clinical Legal Education: Active
Learning in your Law School, (1998) Blackstone Press Limited, London
 S.K.Agrawal (Ed.), Legal Education in India (1973), Tripathi, Bombay.
 N.R. Madhava Menon, (ed) A Handbook of Clinical Legal Education, (1998) Eastern
Book Company, Lucknow.
 M.O.Price, H.Bitner and Bysiewiez, Effective Legal Research (1978)
 Pauline V. Young, Scientific Social Survey and Research, (1962)
 William J. Grade and Paul K. Hatt, Methods in Social Research, Mc Graw-Hill Book
Company, London
 H.M.Hyman, Interviewing in Social Research (1965)
 Payne, The Art of Asking Questions (1965)
 Erwin C. Surrency, B.Fielf and J. Crea, A Guide to Legal Research (1959)
 Morris L. Cohan, Legal Research in Nutshell, (1996), West Publishing Co.
 Havard Law Review Association, Uniform System of Citations.
 ILI Publication, Legal Research and Methodology.
 15

Course Code:LLM-E201
Comparative Substantive Criminal Law
Objective of the course:
The course has been designed with a specific consideration that criminal Justice system can be
understood only after having a broad knowledge of the basic principles of substantive criminal
laws. The particular emphasis shall be on such topics which are relevant for the contemporary
socio-legal issues as well as research. The idea is to inculcate a wider vision among the students
of LL.M. regarding the basic principles of substantive criminal laws.

Unit 1: Concept and Development of Criminal

a) Historical Development of Indian Penal Code
b) Extend and Operation of the Penal Code
c) Development of Criminal Law in J&K State
d) Significant reform areas and trends
Unit 2: Elements or Conditions of Criminal Liability
a) Actus reus or the Harm Principle
b) Mens rea or the Guilty mind or Blame worthiness principle
c) Concurrence or the Concurrence Principle
Unit 3: Complicit Criminality and Incomplete or Inchoate Crimes
a) Abetment
b) Conspiracy
c) Group or Joint Liability U/Ss 34 or 149 IPC
d) Attempts under the Indian Penal Code
Unit 4: General Exceptions or Conditions for Negativing Liability
a) Defence of Mistake
b) Defence of Insanity and Intoxication
c) Defence of Necessity and bonafide action
d) Private defence of body and property

Selected Bibliography:
 Sir H.S. Gour, Commentaries on the Indian Penal Code.
 Ratan Lal and Dhirajlal, Indian Penal Code 33rd Edt (2011)
 P.S.A. Pillia, Criminal Law, Revised by K.I.Vibhute, 2012 Edn., Lexis Nexis
Butterworths
 Essays on the Indian penal Code, Pub. By Indian Law Institute (1962)
 K. Chandrashakeran Pillai (Ed), Essays on the Indian Penal, ILI (2005)
 Mehraj Uddin, Crime and Criminal Justice System in India.
 Andrew Ashworth, Principles of Criminal Law (2008)
 16

 Nicola Lacey and Celia Wells (Ed.) Reconstructing Criminal Law, Butterworths, London
(1998)

Course Code: LLM-E202

COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAW

Objective of the course:

Criminal Procedure is being taught as a compulsory paper at the level of LL.B. today. However,
a jurisprudential thrust has to be given to this subject at the post-graduate level as this is a subject
which has constitutional undertones and jurisprudential importance. A study of comparative
criminal procedure helps students develop an ecumenical approach and broadens their vision. It
inspires them renew and revise their laws to be in tune with developed systems. The paper is
taught with reference to India, England, France and China.

Unit 1: Diverse systems and Models of Criminal Proceedings

a) Adversarial / Accusatorial and Inquisitorial Systems
- Core features of inquisitorial and adversarial systems
- Trends of borrowing the best under both systems
b) Crime Control Model and Due Process Model
- Common elements
- Differing points of emphasis
c) Indian system of Justice Administration and its challenges

Unit 2: Pre-trial Processes

a) Bringing information about crime incident before the formal system (Police or
Magistrate) Ss 154 & 155 and 190 (complaint)
b) Investigation of Crime- Ss 157 to 173
c) Bail and Remand
d) Rights of Accused and Victim
e) Right to Counsel and Legal Aid

Unit 3: Trial Processes

a) Taking Cognizance by courts and committal proceedings
b) Hierarchy of Criminal Courts and types of trials
 17

c) Framing of Charge and Discharge Proceedings

d) Acquittal or Conviction
e) Revision, Appeal and transfer of case for trial

Unit 4: Sentence Process

a) Pre-sentence hearing Ss 235(2) and 248(2)
b) Reformative Sentence
c) Withdrawal from prosection
d) Plea Bargaining
e) Compounding of Offences

Select bibliography

 Hebert L Pecker, Limits of Criminal Sanctions, Chs. 5, 8 & 9, Stanford Univ. Press (1968
 K.N.Chandrasekharan Pillai(ed.), R.V. Kelkar's Outlines of Criminal Procedure (2010),
Eastern,Lucknow.
 Patric Devlin, The Criminal Prosecution in England
 American Series of Foreign Penal Codes Criminal Procedure Code of People's Republic
of China.
 Christina Van Den Wyngart, Criminal Procedure Systems in European Community
 Rene David, Comparison between English and French Criminal Justice System, Tygore
Law Lectures (1981)
 Celia Hampton, Criminal Procedure
 14th and 41st Reports of Indian Law Commission.
The Paper will be taught with reference, wherever necessary, to the procedures in India, England,
US, France, Russia and China.
 18

Course Code: LLM-E203

JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM

Objectives of the course

Juvenile delinquency is considered and important branch of criminology. The impact of juvenile
delinquency upon the formation of Indian criminology tradition does not seem to be noticeable.
No understanding of crimes and treatment of offenders can be complete without a sure grasp of
causes, carrots, and cures of juvenile delinquency.
Increasingly, it is being also realized that young offenders require a wholly different centre of
criminal justice system and should not be treated in the same way as the adult offenders. Juvenile
Justice System, although a part of the criminal justice system has now its own autonomous
characteristics.
In addition, the state and the law have to deal with juveniles in certain situations, as parens
patriae. The category of 'neglected children' defines the burdens of care which state and society
have to assume for neglected children. Most categories of neglected children are also themselves
the victims of crime. The institutional care of children poses its own distinctive dilemmas. These,
too, should be discussed, especially, at the level of resource investment compared with the extent
of need.

Unit 1:Rationale for Separate and Distinct System of Justicing in Cases Relating to
Children
a) History and evolution of juvenile justice
b) Jurisprudential foundations of Juvenile Justice
- Aristotle
- Jown Rawls
- UN Declaration of the Rights of Children 1959 and finally UN Convention on Rights
of the Child 1989 (ratified by the Government of India in 1992)
c) Provincial Children Acts, the Children Act 1960 (Central), Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 and
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2000 (as amended in 2006) and the
JJ (Model) Rules 2007
Unit 2: Definitions of ‘Child’, Distinct Apprehensions, Adjudication and Custodial
Agencies.
a) Two distinct categories, namely „juveniles in conflict with law‟ and „child in need of care
and protection. All persons (both sexes) below 18 years „child‟
b) Juvenile Police Unit to perform apprehending function-informal and social investigatory
role
c) „Juvenile Justice Board‟ instead of Juvenile Court and „Child Welfare Committee‟ to
distinct categories of children
d) Observation Homes, Children‟s Home instead of Prisons. „Fit Person Institutions‟ and
„Fit Person‟ contemplated under the Juvenile Justice Act for pre-adjudication custody.
 19

Unit 3: Apprehension (instead of arrest) Bail, adjudication (instead of trial) and disposition
(instead of Sentence)
a) Limited authority to apprehend Rule 11(7)
b) Extensive Bail right both in Bailable and Non-bailable Offences- S.12 JJ Act.
c) Informal, Summary Inquiry (instead of a formal adversarial trial) that requires only
satisfaction of the Board (S. 15)
d) Expeditious proceedings under Ss. 7A and 14 (four months time)

Unit 4: Role of the Family Police, Role of the NGOs and Role of the Media in Juvenile
Justice
a) Role of the family in delinquency prevention
b) Dual role of police- as an agency of Criminal Judicial Administration and as protector of
Juvenile interest
c) NGO‟s role in custodial institutions and as a friend of every child in need of care
d) Media to expose instances of child exploitation and abuse in public domain as well as
remain sensitive to privacy of children and their families

Select bibliography:
 Myron Weiner, The Child and State in India (1990)
 UN Convention on Right of the Child, 1989
 UN Standard Minimum Rules for Juvenile Justice (Beijing Rules) 1985
 Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (as amended in 2006)
 Juvenile Justice (Model) Rules, 2007
 Savitri Gunasakhare, Children, Law and Justice, Sage Publication, India
 21

THIRD SEMESTER

Course Code: LLM-C301

Judicial Process (Role of the Judiciary in Criminal Procedure)

Objectives of the Course:

A lawyer, whether academic or professional, is expected to be competent to analyse and evaluate
the legal process from a broader juristic perspective. Hence a compulsory paper on Judicial
Process is essential in the LL.M curriculum. The objective of this paper is to study the nature of
judicial process as an instrument of social ordering. It is intended to highlight the role of court as
policy maker, participant in the power process and as an instrument of social change. This paper
further intends to expose the intricacies of judicial creativity and the judicial tools and techniques
employed in the process.
Since the ultimate aim of any legal process or system is pursuit of justice, a systematic study of
the concept of justice and its various theoretical foundations is required. This paper, therefore,
intends to familiarise the students with various theories, different aspects and alternative ways, of
attaining criminal justice.

Unit 1: Role of Judiciary in Pre-Trial Process

a) Monitoring and Supervision of investigatory process

b) Ensuring the collection of best evidence and presence of relevant witness
c) Securing the rights and personal liberty of accused through bail and remand proceedings
and through habeas Corpus petition before the constitutional courts
d) Ensuring speedy disposal of matters at primary stages

Unit 2: Role of Judiciary in Trial Process

a) Ensuring equal access to justice and legal aid to needy party

b) Ensuring fair trial to accused and victims
c) Arriving at impartial verdict of acquittal or conviction
d) Allowing parties to exercise their legitimate rights of revision, appeal etc.
e) According consent to reasoned withdrawal applications and plea of compounding
permitted by law

Unit 3: Role of the Judiciary in Sentencing Process

a) In the event of conviction provide the accused right to hearing before passing sentence
b) Pass a reasoned sentencing order
c) Explore possibilities of according plea Bargaining opportunity to the parties
d) Ensuring „real‟ justice to parties through sentencing decision

Unit 4: Constitutional Court Special Obligation in Safeguarding Citizens Rights

a) Enforcing constitutional and Human Rights of Parties

b) Evolving Public Interest Litigation Strategy to expand judicial remedial reach
c) Developing new compensatory jurisprudence to protect citizen‟s Constitutional Rights
 22

Selected Bibliography:
1. Cordozo, The Nature of Judicial Process (1955), Universal Book, Delhi
2. Henry J. Abraham, Judicial Process (1998) Oxford
3. Upendra Baxi, Indian Supreme Court and Politics (1980) EBC
4. Rajeev Dhavan, The Supreme Court of India- A Socio-legal Critique of its Juristic
Techniques, N.M.Tripathi, Bombay
5. Selected Supreme Court Readings.

Course Code: LLM-C302

PROJECT WORK

The Student shall have to select an important current issue with socio-legal dimensions
and undertake field work. He shall also be required to submit a detailed report of his
work and conclusions drawn and make a power point presentation in the School in
presence of the experts.
 23
Every paper will compromise of 8 questions spread over four parts. Every part will comprise of
two questions. A candidate shall have to attempt one question from each part.

Course Code: LLM-E301

Police and Criminal Justice System

Objectives of the Course:

The course has been designed with a specific consideration that criminal Justice system can be
understood only after having a broad knowledge of the basic principles concerning one of the
important wings of the government. The particular emphasis shall be on such topics which are
relevant for the contemporary socio-legal issues as well as research. The idea is to inculcate a
wider vision among the students of LL.M. regarding the basic principles of police functions.
Further due emphasis had been laid on investigation process, police powers and compliance with
the constitutional and human rights guarantees. After giving a deep insight in working of the
police functioning, the course is framed with an objective to inculcate investigative aptitude of
policing among the students.

Unit 1: The Police System

a) History and evolution of Modern Policing in India
b) Structure and organization of Police
c) Relationship of Police with CBI and other Para-Military Forces and Military
d) Structure and Organization of Police in J&K State

Unit 2: Powers and Functions of Police

a) Investigatory powers of Police
- Collection of evidence
- Forming an opinion
- Filing a police report U/S 173
b) Law and order maintenance function of Police
c) VIP security and crime prevention function
d) Police and prosecution relationship
e) Police Community relationship

Unit 3: Police and Compliance with constitutional and Human Rights Guarantees
a) Policing in a democratic society
b) Policing as guarantor of protection of citizens
c) Police and Victims

Unit 4: Police Reforms

a) Dharmveera Committee Report
b) Padmanabhayya Committee Report
c) Malimath Committee Report and Police Reforms
 24

Selected Bibliography:
 Chaturvedi, S.K., Role of Police in Criminal Justice System.
 Arvind Verma and K.S.Subraminiam, Documentation and Understanding the Police in
India
 S. Verma Gopal Rao, Criminal Justice: Problems and Perspectives in India
 The Indian Police Act, 1861 and the Bombay Police Act, 1951

Course Code: LLM-E302

Evidentiary Issues Relating to the Use of Modern Technology & Forensic in
Criminal Trials

Objectives of the Course:

In the era of technology it is inevitable that the students of LL.M shall be kept abreast with
various forms of crmes related to modern technologies. This subject has been incorporated with a
view to impart to students knowledge of crimes and laws related to cyber world. Care has been
taken to incorporate certain important topics related to forensic sciences and their evidentiary
values in criminal jurisprudence.

Unit 1: Crucial Role of Evidence in Criminal Trials

a) Need for violent and admissible evidence in terms of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
b) Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Criminal Trials
c) Need for investigation and prosecution agencies to appreciate the special value of use of
modern technology in collection and presentation of evidence

Unit 2: Cyber Crimes and Modern Technology

a) Nature and Definition of Cyber Crime

b) Offence and Penalties under the IT Act 2000
c) Cyber Policing in India: Legal Status

Unit3: Forensic Evidence and Criminal Trials

a) Kinds of Forensic Evidence

 25

- Blood sample, saliva and other evidence from the person of victim and accused
- Finger prints
- Ballistic evidence
- Post mortem report
- DNA evidence
b) Probative Value of Forensic Evidence
c) Processes Involved in Collecting Forensic Evidence

Unit 4: Technology as A Means of Better Crime Prevention

a) Intercepting potentially dangerous crime information
b) Use of Technology Tools in Neutralizing and rendering harmless actual designs of
infiltration and attack
c) Preventing violation of Intellectual Property Rights by techniques of Passwords‟,
Firewalls‟, Encryption, Digital Signature, Clipper Chip, Reuters and Gateways
d) Ensuring Data Safety

Selected Bibliography:
 Dr. Jaishanker and Amin, Forensic Science and Criminal Investigation.
 Sharma, Forensic Science in Criminal Investigation.
 Harry Soderman & John O. Conell, Modern Criminal Investigation, Fung and Wangnalls
Co. New York
 UN (1997) UN Mnaual on the Prevention and Control of Computer Related Crime,
International Review of Criminal Policy NOs 43 & 44, UN, New York.
 Barkha and U Rammohan, Cyber Law and Crimes
 Albert J. Marcella & Robert S Greenfield (Eds), Cyber Forensics, A Field Manual For
Collecting, Examining and Preserving Evidence of Computer Crimes (2002)
 Pease. K., “Crime Futures and Foresight: Challenging Criminal Behaviour in
Information Age” in D.Wall (Ed.) Crime and Internet, Routledge:London (2001)
 McQuade, Samuel C, Understanding and Managing Cyber Crime, Allyn and Bacon,
U.S.A (2005)
 26

FOURTH SEMESTER

Paper II TEACHING ASSIGNMENT

Paper III DISSERTATION

 27

Statutes

1. LL.M programme shall comprise of four semesters which shall be spread over the two
academic years.
2. Each semester shall have 16 credits. There shall be 64 credits in total for the entire LL.M
course.
3. There shall be six foundation or core papers and seven optional papers to be taught in
whole LL.M programme
4. First and Second Semesters shall comprise of four theory papers each, with two core
papers and two optional papers. The student shall be required to take two compulsory
papers and with the permission of the School shall have the choice to select two optional
papers from any of the optional groups. Each theory paper carries 4 credits and 100
marks.

5. Third semester shall comprise of three theory papers with 4 credits and 100 marks each
and the fourth paper shall be confined to a project work assigned to the student with the
weightage of credits and marks similar to theory papers.

6. Fourth semester shall comprise two papers with 8 credits and 200 marks each. Paper I in
fourth semester shall be based on Internship, i.e. teaching assignment and Paper II shall
be based on writing a dissertation on a topic to be identified by the School in consultation
with the teacher in charge and student concerned.

7. The duration of the examination in each paper shall be three hours.

8. The student must clear a course within the stipulated period. However, the University on
the recommendation of the School may grant extension for a maximum period of one
year, provided the student due to illness or any other justifiable cause is not in a position
to complete the course within the stipulated period.

9. A student shall be continuously evaluated for his/her academic performance in a course

through Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) [tutorials, practicals, home assignments,
class assignments, term papers, field work, seminars, periodical tests etc.] and End
Semester Examination, as prescribed in the examination scheme of the respective course
duly approved by the authority concerned. The distribution of marks for specialized
papers like Clinical Courses and Project Work shall be prescribed by the concerned
School Board.
10. The marks distribution for theory courses shall be as under:
End Semester Examination (ESE) : 60 Marks
Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) : 35 Marks
Attendance : 05 Marks
 28

The breakup of Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) shall be as follows: -

Best of 2 out of 3 presentations : 20 marks
Group Discussion : 10 marks
Assignment Test : 05 marks
Total : 35 marks

11. Dissertation
 Four copies of dissertation written under the guidance of a teacher of the
School to be nominated by the Head shall be submitted to the Head of the
School with a certificate that dissertation was written under the guidance
of the supervisor and consists of original piece of work.
 The dissertation shall be submitted within the period of three months from
the date of commencement of LL.M 4th semester.
 The dissertation shall be got evaluated by the external examiner to be
appointed by the Vice-Chancellor from the panel of the examiners
submitted by the supervisor and duly recommended by Head and Dean of
the School.
 The viva-voce shall be conducted by the Board comprising of Dean of the
School, Head of the School, Supervisor and External examiner.
12. Attendance
a) A candidate to be eligible to appear in the Continuous Internal Assessment/End
Semester Examination of a course or a complete semester shall have to put in a
minimum of 75% attendance in that course/semester in addition to satisfying all other
relevant conditions laid down in the Regulations.
b) Provided in exceptional cases, the Dean of the School, on the recommendations of the
HoD concerned, shall condone the shortage of attendance to a maximum of 5% if the
claim is justified and supported by valid documents.
c) Condonation of shortage of more than 5% & up to 10% may be recommended by the
Dean of the School to the Vice Chancellor with full justification whose decision shall
be final.
d) Marks break-up for attendance:
Up to 75% : No marks
76% to 80% : 1 mark
81% to 85% : 2 marks
86% to 90% : 3 marks
91% to 95% : 4 marks
96% to 100% : 5 marks