1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

Rationale

Wheelchairs are essential mobility aids designed to assist individuals with

physical disabilities, medical conditions, or injuries that prevent them from

walking. These devices help users maintain independence, participate in daily

activities, and improve their overall quality of life. While wheelchairs come in

different types, including manual and powered models with various features,

most focus solely on mobility and lack integrated safety mechanisms for

emergencies.

People with mobility impairments may experience accidents, sudden

health issues, or other emergency situations where immediate assistance is

required. However, conventional wheelchairs do not have built-in systems to

provide first aid support, making users more vulnerable in critical moments. This

highlights the need for an improved mobility solution that combines both

movement assistance.

This study aligns with the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 - Good

Health and Well-Being, Which promotes access to health care and safety for all

individuals. In response to this need, the researchers propose CareWheel: A

Mobility Solution with First Aid, a wheelchair innovation designed to enhance

user safety. By integrating basic first-aid features, CareWheel aims to provide a

more secure and responsive mobility aid for individuals who require assistance.
 2

Through this capstone, we seek to develop a practical solution that

improves both mobility and safety for wheelchair users. The findings of this study

will contribute to the advancement in promoting inclusivity and better health care

accessibility for people with disability

Statement of the Problem

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Care Wheel in

providing enhanced assistance to individuals in need, particularly in emergency

situations. Specifically, this research seeks to answer the following questions:

1.How accessible is the Care Wheel for users?

2.What is the impact of the Care Wheel in emergency situations?

3.How does the Care Wheel compare to a conventional wheelchair in terms of

cost?

Statement of Hypothesis

1. There is no significant difference in the safety and emergency response

efficiency between conventional wheelchairs and CareWheel, a mobility

solution with first aid kit.

2. The integration of a first-aid features in a wheelchair does not significantly

improve the response time during emergencies.

3. There is no significant difference in user perception regarding the usability,

functionality, and reliability of CareWheel compared to traditional

wheelchair
 3

Significance of the Study

The results of this study will benefit by the following:

Industry Professionals. This study can benefit manufacturers and suppliers

involved in the development of built-in first aid kits designed specifically for

wheelchairs. The findings may guide improvements in the design, integration,

accessibility, and overall quality of materials—such as fiberglass and related

components—used in these kits. Enhancing these aspects can help ensure the

kits are efficient, user-friendly, and practical for emergency situations

encountered by wheelchair users.

Community. Communities benefit from the inclusion of built-in first aid kits in

wheelchairs by promoting safety, independence, and preparedness for

individuals with mobility challenges. Quick and convenient access to first aid

resources empowers users to respond promptly to injuries or health concerns

without relying on others. In educational or public settings, this feature supports

inclusivity and fosters a safer environment that minimizes disruptions and

improves well-being for all.

Future Researcher. Future researchers can explore the effectiveness and

impact of wheelchair-integrated built-in first aid kits in improving emergency

response and personal safety. This study provides foundational data that may

inform future innovations in assistive technologies and health-related equipment.

Further investigation may reveal how accessible first aid solutions contribute to
 4

userconfidence, emergency preparedness, and the overall quality of life for

people with disabilities

 5

Scope and Limitations

The investigation analyzes CareWheel: A Mobility Solution with First Aid

Kit which represents a wheelchair seeking to enhance safety capabilities for

users with mobility disabilities. Users can have essential supplies readily

accessible through the medical bag that comes with CareWheel. These safety

features on the wheelchair provide increased emergency response time while

making emergency supplies more accessible to users and boosting their

confidence in safety.

The research approach entails creating and developing CareWheel

through functional examinations of its wheelchair and emergency medical

services abilities. The research examines CareWheel against traditional

wheelchairs by listing its beneficial aspects although it addresses technical

limitations. User feedback will examine both CareWheel functionality and

reliability as well as its user interface. Participants in the study include wheelchair

users with their caregivers along with health service providers for obtaining an

extensive evaluation of the device's practical performance.

However, the study has several limitations. The integration of additional

components may result in a heavier and more complex wheelchair compared to

conventional models. While the wheelchair includes a medical bag, the storage

capacity may not be sufficient for all medical necessities. Additionally, the

inclusion of advanced features may increase production costs, and regular

maintenance will be required to ensure proper functionality.

 6

CareWheel delivers an innovative answer that unites disability mobility

needs with emergency readiness even though it has specific operational

constraints. This research initiative advances assistive technology through the

development of a safer distinct mobility solution which presents higher

responsiveness and enhanced user-friendliness for disabled users.

Definition of terms

To ensure clarity and a better understanding of the study, the following

key terms are defined:

Emergency an emergency is an urgent, sudden, and serious event or an

unforeseen change in circumstances that necessitates immediate action to

remedy harm or avert imminent danger to life, health, or property.

First Aid Kit a set of basic medical supplies and tools that allow users or

caregivers to administer immediate medical assistance in case of emergencies.

Mobility the ability to move or be moved freely and easily.

Wheelchair a manually or electrically powered chair with wheels,

designed for individuals who have difficulty walking due to illness, injury, or

disability.
 7

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

Wheelchair

The application of virtual reality (VR) technology for self-teaching first aid

training is examined in this article. Phatichon, B., & Chantrapornchai, C. (2024)

VR is proven to give people realistic training experiences. Using the Unity engine

and a VR interaction framework, we developed interactive first aid training that

offered hands-on practice and assessments based on real-world tasks. Ten

lectures and seven tests made up the VR application materials, which included

first aid information compiled from numerous government and medical sources.

After 14 students evaluated the lessons, the average overall satisfaction score

was 9.1. Compared to pre-course levels, the post-training first aid knowledge

exam results rose by 35%. With their practical exam results increasing by an

average of 22% following numerous tests, all students reported feeling more

confident, indicating that the program could be utilized successfully for practice

and learning.

Comfortability

Khalid and Hassan (2021) conducted a study on the design and analysis

of an ergonomic office chair to improve comfort and productivity. They found that

the key factors affecting chair comfort and productivity were seat height, seat
 8

depth, backrest angle, armrest height, and lumbar support. The authors used

computer-aided design (CAD) and finite element analysis (FEA) to optimize

these design parameters and evaluate the stress and strain distribution in the

chair. They found

that the optimized chair design led to reduced stress on the body and

improved comfort and productivity. Based on their findings, Khalid and Hassan

suggested that the use of CAD and FEA in chair design can lead to the

development of more comfortable and ergonomic chairs that promote productivity

and reduce the risk of musculoskeletal disorders. They emphasized the

importance of considering both subjective and objective measures of comfort and

productivity when evaluating chair design.

Kim, Lee, and Park (2021) conducted a study on the effect of seat shape

on seat comfort in automotive seats. They found that the shape of the seat has a

significant impact on the distribution of pressure on the buttocks, thighs, and

lower back, which affects seat comfort. The authors also noted that seat shape

affects the natural posture of the body, which can contribute to discomfort and

pain. Based on their findings, Kim, Lee, and Park suggested that optimizing seat

shape to promote natural posture and reduce pressure on the body can lead to

the design of more comfortable and ergonomic automotive seats. They

emphasized the importance of considering both subjective and objective

measures of comfort when evaluating seat design.

 9

Kim and Park (2020) developed a chair comfort evaluation model based

on user satisfaction. Their study included a survey of 194 participants who were

asked to evaluate the comfort of chairs based on six factors: seat comfort,

backrest comfort, armrest comfort, adjustability, aesthetics, and overall

satisfaction. The authors found that seat comfort was the most important factor

for overall chair comfort, followed by backrest comfort and adjustability. They

also noted that armrest comfort and aesthetics had a relatively small impact on

user satisfaction. Based on these findings, Kim and Park suggested that future

chair designs should prioritize seat and backrest comfort, as well as adjustability,

to promote user satisfaction and comfort.

Durability

Metals are commonly used in various applications due to their strength

and durability. The durability of metals refers to their ability to resist degradation,

corrosion, and wear over time. It is an important factor to consider in the

selection of materials for different applications, as it affects the serviThe studies

discussed focus on identifying the key factors that affect the comfortability of

chairs, and using advanced methods to optimize these factors in the design

process. For instance, Kim and Park (2020) emphasize the importance of seat

comfort, backrest comfort, and adjustability in promoting user satisfaction, while

Liu, Zhao, and Jiang (2021) highlight the importance of considering factors such

as seat height, seat depth, and lumbar support to accommodate the natural

posture of the human body. Weng and Lee (2020) take it a step further by using

finite element analysis and design of experiments to identify and optimize the key
 10

design parameters that affect chair comfort, such as seat cushion thickness,

maintenance requirements, and safety of the structures or devices. Several

studies have investigated the durability of metals and factors that affect it.

The studies discussed focus on identifying the key factors that affect the

comfortability of chairs, and using advanced methods to optimize these factors in

the design process. For instance, Kim and Park (2020) emphasize the

importance of seat comfort, backrest comfort, and adjustability in promoting user

satisfaction, while Liu, Zhao, and Jiang (2021) highlight the importance of

considering factors such as seat height, seat depth, and lumbar support to

accommodate the natural posture of the human body. Weng and Lee (2020) take

it a step further by using finite element analysis and design of experiments to

identify and optimize the key design parameters that affect chair comfort, such as

seat cushion thickness.

Metals can corrode when exposed to harsh environments, such as high

temperatures, humidity, or corrosive chemicals. The corrosion resistance of

metals can be improved by applying protective coatings or using alloys with

higher corrosion resistance (Azimi et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2021).The processing

and manufacturing of metals can also affect their durability. For example, heat

treatment can improve the strength and hardness of metals, but it can also

increase their susceptibility to corrosion (Zhang et al., 2021). Surface treatments,

such as shot peening or electroplating, can also affect the surface properties and

durability of metals (Wang et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020).

 11

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Assistive Technology Theory (ATT)

This theory ATT has been created with the objective of assisting the

elderly, the physically challenged or the people who have limited movement

capability so that their quality of living can be improved and they can be more

independent. The theory pays attention to accessibility-enhancing, mobility-

enhancing, and safety-enhancing assistive devices through proper user-centered

design, which is custom made with respect to precise requirements. Cook and

Hussey (1995) defined assistive technology as that which is functional, adaptive,

and challenge responsive while still allowing the user to perform activities of daily

living without much difficulty. ATT is critical in the creation of CareWheel as it

concerns the device's aim of enhancing mobility while integrating first-aid

assistance and emergency alert systems for safe and immediate action during

emergencies.

Person-Environment-Occupation (PEO) Model (Law et al., 1996)

The PEO Model shows how an individual's environment and physical

health affect their success in performing day-to-day actions. This thing [or

concept] stops being something stable and static and becomes something
 12

dynamic that takes place during the interaction of individuals with them, their

environment, and in their context, with their tools to help them achieve a better

quality of life. Law et al. (1996) has suggested that a perfect assistive device fits

user needs and environmental requirements, allowing both access and

independence. In the case of CareWheel, this model suggests that an

appropriately implemented wheelchair with first-aid and emergency features

would

Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory (SCDNT) (Dorethea Orem, 1971)

As Dorothea Orem (1971) established through her Self-Care Deficit

Nursing Theory people with health problems or physical limitations require help

to maintain their self-care abilities. The theory focuses on helping people who are

physically disabled accomplish daily activities for movement as well as

maintaining safety along with their health needs. According to the theory one

should receive appropriate care which enables self-sufficient independence. The

theory promotes utilization of assistive tools together with equipment which

supports the autonomous performance of basic everyday tasks.

By integrating these theoretical perspectives, this study aims to develop a

mobility solution that is both functional and user-friendly, ultimately contributing to

the advancement of assistive technology and the improvement of the lives of

individuals with disabilities.

 13

Theoretical Background

CAREWHEEL: A
MOBILITY SOLUTION
WITH BUILT-IN FIRST
AID KIT

Assistive Technology
Aly gwapa
Theory (ATT)

Person-Environment- Self-Care Deflict

Occupation (PEO) Nursing Theory
Model (SCDNT)

1.How accessible is the Care

Wheel for the users?
2. What is the impact of Care
Wheel in emergency
situations?
3. How does the Care Wheel
 14

Wheelchair with fastened first aid

bag for easy access

Fig. 1. Schematic Presentation of the Theoretical Background of the Study

CHAPTER III

METHODOLOGY

CareWheel Prototype Assembly

When making a first aid kit box begin by selecting from plastic metal or

wood materials that will maintain durability. Building the box from raw materials

requires precise cutting of panels for each part of base sides and lid while

maintaining polished edges. The assembly process requires the use of

appropriate fasteners to permanently connect sides to the base. For a hinged lid

you should install appropriate hinges which enable opening and closing

functions. The addition of a locking mechanism provides extra security to

maintain closed box conditions when it is away from use.After construction of the

box body, dividers and foam can be added to create organizational

compartments. Place a visible “First Aid” label combined with an identified

medical safety symbol on the outer box surface for instant recognition. Check the

box for its strength and simple opening mechanisms and proper closure abilities.

To maintain its readiness for emergencies the box needs scheduled upkeep that

preserves its operational integrity.

Test Done
 15

The result shows that the most scale that they answer the assessment of

the CareWheel’s first aid kit accessibility, derived from ten specific evaluation

statements, resulted in an average score of 3.72. This corresponds to a

classification of “good accessibility,” which has a verbal interpretation of the

CareWheel has an accessibility that is generally satisfactory, with only minor

limitations that do not significantly hinder usability. suggesting that the device is

largely accessible and functional, with only minor limitations that have minimal

impact on overall usability.

Table 4

This table is about the scoring procedure for accessibility to built-in first aid

kit

Scale Numerical Descriptive Rating Verbal Interpretation

Rating

5 4.21 - 5.00 Excellent The CareWheel has an

accessibility that is

outstanding, with minimal

to no barriers. The system,

service, or environment is

highly inclusive and user-

friendly.

4 3.41 - 4.20 Good Accessibility The CareWheel has an

accessibility that is

generally satisfactory, with

only minor limitations that

 16

do not significantly hinder

usability.

3 2.61 - 3.40 Moderate The CareWheel has an

Accessibility accessibility that is fair but

has noticeable limitations.

Some users may

experience challenges,

requiring occasional

assistance or adaptation.

2 1.82 - 2.60 Poor Accessibility The CareWheel

accessibility is inadequate,

with significant barriers that

make it difficult for many

users to fully access or

utilize the system.

1 1.00 - 1.81 Very Inaccessibility The CareWheel

accessibility is extremely

poor, with severe

limitations that prevent

most users from accessing

or using the system

effectively.

The data collected was then treated to a paired t-test in a mini tab comparing the

built in first aid kit before and after

 17

CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents the findings from the evaluation of the accessibility

of the built in first aid kit into the wheelchair. The data collected from users

feedback and performance assessment provide insights into the effectiveness of

the CareWheel and how accessible to the users.

Table 1

Showed the mean rating of the accessibility of the CareWheel using the

scoring procedure

Evaluation Statement Mean

1. How satisfied are you with the ease of accessing the first aid kit 3.8

when needed (e.g., can you reach it easily, even in emergency

situations)?

2. How easy is it for you to access the first aid kit when needed 3.8

(e.g., can you reach it easily, even in an emergency situation)?

3.9
3. How satisfied are you with how easy it is for a caregiver or
 18

assistant to access the first aid kit when needed?

4. How easy is it for the user to access the first aid kit while seated 4.0

in the wheelchair?

5. Can the user retrieve medical supplies with minimal effort, even 3.6

with limited arm reach?

6. Can the user access the first aid kit without needing to 3.6

reposition themselves in the wheelchair?

7. Is the first aid kit accessible to users with different levels of 3.5

upper body mobility?

8. Does the compartment opening mechanism require significant 3.7

strength or dexterity to open?

9. Does the first aid kit compartment allow for quick, one-handed 3.5

access?

10. Is the compartment positioned in a way that does not interfere 3.8

with other wheelchair functions, such as braking or armrest

adjustments?

The evaluation of the CareWheel’s first aid kit accessibility, based on ten

individual statements, produced a mean rating of 3.72, indicating an overall

 19

“good accessibility” classification. According to the scoring procedure applied,

this score signifies that the accessibility of the CareWheel is generally

satisfactory, with only minor limitations that do not significantly hinder usability.

People assigned mean scores between 3.5 and 4.0 on every statement

indicating consistent accessibility of the first aid kit regardless of usage

conditions. The scoring of 4.0 on Evaluation Statement 4 (“How easy is it for the

user to access the first aid kit while seated in the wheelchair”) indicates optimal

usability in critical real-world conditions. The accessibility of the device towards

caregivers received a mean score of 3.9 in Statement 3 which demonstrates the

device effectively meets needs from both parties.

Stated scores at 3.5 for statements dealing with first aid kit accessibility to

diverse users with upper body conditions and one-handed convenience suggest

improvements would enhance inclusiveness (Questions 7 and 9). The test results

show that product accessibility meets “good” criteria which ensures compatibility

with users who have physical limitations.

The product design follows principles of universal design because (Mace,

1998) showed its goal to establish accessibility that serves all users regardless of

physical capability. The CareWheel demonstrates strong accessibility but specific

design optimizations to compartment placement and dexterity needs would

improve it to a level exceeding “good” ratings.

User satisfaction consistency at the mean scores of 3.8 in Statements 1,

2, and 10 demonstrates a design strategy that follows best practices for assistive
 20

technology design because accessibility and comfort remain essential design

factors according to Story et al (1998).

Evaluation Statement 1: How satisfied are you with the ease of accessing the

first aid kit when needed after evaluation has a mean of 3.8. From the scoring

procedure, this numerical rating has an good accessibility evaluation, which

means the CareWheel has an Accessibility is generally satisfactory, with only

minor limitations that do not significantly hinder usability.

Evaluation Statement 2: How easy is it for you to access the first aid kit when

needed after evaluation has a mean of 3.8. From the scoring procedure, this

numerical rating has an good accessibility evaluation, which means The

CareWheel has an Accessibility is generally satisfactory, with only minor

limitations that do not significantly hinder usability.

Evaluation Statement 3: How satisfied are you with how easy it is for a caregiver

or assistant to access the first aid kit when needed after evaluation has a mean

of 3.9. From the scoring procedure, this numerical rating has an good

accessibility evaluation, which means The CareWheel has an Accessibility is

generally satisfactory, with only minor limitations that do not significantly hinder

usability.

Evaluation Statement 4: How easy is it for the user to access the first aid kit while

seated in the wheelchair after evaluation has a mean of 4.0. From the scoring

procedure, this numerical rating has an good accessibility evaluation, which

 21

means The CareWheel has an Accessibility is generally satisfactory, with only

minor limitations that do not significantly hinder usability.

Evaluation Accessibility 5: Can the user retrieve medical supplies with minimal

effort, even with limited arm reach after evaluation has a mean of 3.6. From the

scoring procedure, this numerical rating has an good accessibility evaluation,

which means The CareWheel has an Accessibility is generally satisfactory, with

only minor limitations that do not significantly hinder usability.

Evaluation Accessibility 6: Can the user access the first aid kit without needing to

reposition themselves in the wheelchair after evaluation has a mean of 3.6. From

the scoring procedure, this numerical rating has an good accessibility evaluation,

which means The CareWheel has an Accessibility is generally satisfactory, with

only minor limitations that do not significantly hinder usability.

Evaluation Accessibility 7: Is the first aid kit accessible to users with different

levels of upper body mobility after evaluation has a mean of 3.5. From the

scoring procedure, this numerical rating has an good accessibility evaluation,

which means The CareWheel has an Accessibility is generally satisfactory, with

only minor limitations that do not significantly hinder usability.

Evaluation Accessibility 8: Does the compartment opening mechanism require

significant strength or dexterity to open after evaluation has a mean of 3.7. From

the scoring procedure, this numerical rating has an good accessibility evaluation,

which means The CareWheel has an Accessibility is generally satisfactory, with

only minor limitations that do not significantly hinder usability.

 22

Evaluation Accessibility 9: Does the first aid kit compartment allow for quick, one-

handed access after evaluation has a mean of 3.5. From the scoring procedure,

this numerical rating has an good accessibility evaluation, which means The

CareWheel has an Accessibility is generally satisfactory, with only minor

limitations that do not significantly hinder usability.

Evaluation Accessibility 10: Is the compartment positioned in a way that does not

interfere with other wheelchair functions, such as braking or armrest adjustments

after evaluation has a mean of 3.8. From the scoring procedure, this numerical

rating has an good accessibility evaluation, which means The CareWheel has an

Accessibility is generally satisfactory, with only minor limitations that do not

significantly hinder usability.

The CareWheel accessibility evaluation shows that the product offers

generally good accessibility although minor accessibility limitations exist that do

not impede its use substantially. Caretakers and users agreed that accessing

their first aid kit was satisfactory but faced minimal access hurdles as shown

through ratings of 3.8 and 3.9. Customers using wheelchairs received an

excellent score 4.0 for their ability to access the first aid kit while seated. Users

report the CareWheel maintains accessibility when using their limited arm reach

to recover medical supplies or accessing the kit without wheelchair movement

yet some wheelchair users with severe arm mobility issues may encounter minor

complications. People with different levels of upper body mobility gave an

average rating of 3.5 indicating a satisfactory level of access but some

individuals with severe disabilities may encounter issues. Users found the
 23

mechanism for opening compartments and accessing the first aid kit with one

hand to be mainly accessible although the efforts required or needed dexterity

skills earned mean ratings of 3.7 and 3.5 respectively. The wheelchair

compartment maintains an acceptable rating of 3.8 regarding its placement

relative to braking mechanisms and armrest controls since it avoids creating any

interaction or obstruction with these functions. The CareWheel provides

satisfactory accessibility through its stable set of ratings which fall between 3.5

and 4.0. The wheelchair shows overall strong performance but users with

reduced mobility and people requiring single-hand operations might face small

obstacles with its use. These minor limitations, however, do not significantly

affect the product’s overall usability.

 24

CHAPTER V

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary of Findings

The CareWheel displays satisfactory accessibility through minor usability

constraints which do not interfere with utility. First aid kit accessibility proved

satisfactory according to both caretakers and users yet they faced minor access

hurdles. Assessment of the kit from seated positions remains feasible for

wheelchair users while individuals with restricted arm range or those who need to

avoid changing position can maintain access to the product. People who

experience significant limitations in arm or upper body mobility could find the

CareWheel challenging to use. Users found the compartment opening

mechanism and one-handed access usable though they required some extra

effort. This compartment placement does not restrict standard wheelchair

operations in any way. Use of the CareWheel shows positive results but petite

users or users operating with single hands might experience limited accessibility

challenges that affect the device's usability minimally.

Conclusion
 25

The findinds of the CareWheel presents excellent accessibility features

that satisfy most user requirements effectively. The product has minor

operational limitations which impact users with severe mobility difficulties and

those who need one-hand usage although these problems do not affect basic

usage effectiveness. Users with restricted reach can quickly reach the first aid kit

through the wheelchair which maintains functionality of all essential wheel

operations. Users of the CareWheel experience a satisfactory product operation

but specific needs of certain users require additional optimization.

Recommendation

While the CareWheel demonstrates overall satisfactory accessibility and

functionality, minor improvements are recommended to enhance usability for

users with limited upper body mobility or petite stature. Specifically, redesigning

the compartment opening mechanism to require less effort and adjusting

placement for improved reachability could significantly reduce minor access

hurdles. These enhancements would ensure more inclusive usability without

compromising the device's core functionality or wheelchair compatibility.

The Locks: Enhance the locking mechanism by finding another locking

mechanism.

The position: Put it in the comfortable place where the users can move

easily.
 26

Reference
 27

Azimi, M., Moghaddam, A., & Zhang, T. (2020). Improving corrosion resistance of
metals: Methods and material selection. Corrosion Science, 103(1),
12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.02.003

Khalid, S., & Hassan, S. (2021). Design and analysis of an ergonomic office chair
to improve comfort and productivity. Journal of Ergonomics and
Workplace Design, 24(3), 212–227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jewd.2021.01.005

Kim, S., & Park, J. (2020). Chair comfort evaluation model based on user
satisfaction. Ergonomics Journal, 29(2), 134–150.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.02.004

Kim, S., Lee, Y., & Park, J. (2021). Effect of seat shape on seat comfort in
automotive seats. Journal of Automotive Design, 45(1), 36–44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jautodes.2021.01.009

Liu, Y., Zhao, L., & Jiang, X. (2021). Design optimization of ergonomic chair
parameters: A finite element approach. Applied Ergonomics, 52(4), 104–
116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.01.008

Mace, R. L. (1998). Universal design in housing. Assistive Technology, 10(1),

21–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1998.10131957

Pan, Y., Yang, J., & Zhao, L. (2021). Enhancement of metal durability through
protective coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology, 383(7), 217–230.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.02.009
 28

Phatichon, B., & Chantrapornchai, C. (2024). First aid training using virtual
reality. Science, Engineering and Health Studies, 24020001.
https://doi.org/10.69598/sehs.18.24020001

Story, M. F., & Mace, R. L. (1998). The Universal Design File: Designing

for People of All Ages and Abilities.

Wang, R., Zhang, C., & Liu, D. (2020). Effects of shot peening on metal surface
durability. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 276, 116–125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.06.004

Weng, X., & Lee, H. (2020). Optimization of key design parameters for
ergonomic chairs using finite element analysis and design of experiments.
Journal of Furniture Design, 35(3), 224–233.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.furn.2020.06.005

Xu, P., Wang, Q., & Li, M. (2020). Electroplating and its effects on metal
durability. Journal of Surface Engineering, 56(6), 89–98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.001

Zhang, S., Li, G., & Sun, H. (2021). Heat treatment effects on metal strength and
corrosion resistance. Materials Science and Engineering A, 800, 341–352.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.03.022
 29

APPENDICES
30
 31

Curriculum Vitae
 32

Zac Wayne M. Navaja

San Josemaria Village, Camp 10 Toledo City, Cebu

[email protected]

09959617949

Personal Information

Age: 17

Nationality: Filipino

Civil Status: Single

Date of Birth: July 27, 2007

Place of Birth: Mandaue City

 33

Language: Cebuano, Filipino, English

Religion: Roman Catholic

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Elementary: West Bay Learning Center

Address: San Josemaria Village Toledo City Cebu

Year Graduated: 2019

Junior High School: De La Salle Andres Soriano Memorial College

Address: Don Andres Soriano, Toledo City

Year Graduated: 2023

 34

Fernando B. Navales III

Luray 1, Poblacion, Toledo City
[email protected]
09278719447

Personal Information

Age: 18

Nationality: Filipino

Civil Status: Single

Date of birth: March 3, 2007

Place of birth: Toledo City

Language: Cebuano, Filipino, English

Religion: Roman Catholic

 35

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Elementary: De La Salle Andres Soriano Memorial College

Address: Don Andres Soriano, Lutopan, Toledo City

Year Graduated: 2019

Junior High School: De La Salle Andres Soriano Memorial College

Address: Don Andres Soriano, Lutopan, Toledo City

Year Graduated: 2023

 36

Art Jake Soroño

Das Village 2, Toledo City, Cebu City

[email protected]

09638851354/09812622282

Personal Information

Age: 18

Nationality: Filipino

Sex: Male

Civil Status: Single

Date of Birth: January 10, 2007

Place of Birth: Cebu City

 37

Language: Cebuano, Tagalog, English

Religion: Roman Catholic

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Elementary: Don Andres Soriano Elementary School

Address: Don Andres Soriano, Toledo City

Year Graduated: 2019

Junior High School: Don Andres Soriano National High School

Address: Don Andres Soriano, Toledo City

Year Graduated: 2023

 38

RYLE A. ROLDAN

Purok Acasia, ULING CITY OF NAGA, CEBU CITY

[email protected]

09623044772

Personal Information

Age: 18

Nationality: Filipino

Civil Status: Single

Date of birth: June 13, 2006

Place of birth: Cebu City

Language: Cebuano, Filipino, English

 39

Religion: Roman Catholic

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Elementar Uling Elementary School

Address Uling, City of Naga, Cebu

Year Graduated 2019

Junior High School De La Salle ASMC (Gr. 7-10)

Address Don Andres Soriano, Toledo City

Year Graduated 2023

 40

Raven Abaño Tura

Don Juan Climaco Sr., Magdugo, Toledo City

09150415445

[email protected]

PERSONAL DATA

Age: 18

Nationality: Filipino

Sex: Male

Civil Status: Single

Date of Birth: December 19,2006

Place Of Birth: Toledo City

Language: Cebuano,Tagalog, and English

Religion: Roman Catholic

 41

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUNDS

Elementary: St. Miguel Agustine Pro Learning Center

Address: Don Andres Soriano, Toledo City

Year Graduate: 2019

Junior High School: De La Salle Andres Soriano Memorial College

Year Graduate: 2023

 42

Dear [Sir. Remar Bacula],

This message extends warm regards to you. We want to show our profound

appreciation for your constant support which guided our capstone project since

the beginning until the end.

Your combination of expertise and patience and dedication has transformed our

project and allowed us to develop academically as well as personally. Your

dedication to us has brought us immense gratitude which we cherish doubly

because you served as our inspiring mentor through every part of our journey.

We generously thank God for directing us throughout our journey while supplying

our project with strength and wisdom. Under divine leadership we achieved our

current level of success because we would have struggled to deal with the

obstacles that came our way.

With sincere gratitude,

[Group 3 CAREWHEEL: A MOBILITY SOLUTION WITH BUILT-IN FIRST AID

KIT]