High Performance Chromatographic (GPC) Method For The Estimation of Diacerein in Solid Dosage Forms
High Performance Chromatographic (GPC) Method For The Estimation of Diacerein in Solid Dosage Forms
ABSTRACT: Diacerein is now widely used for the treatment of Osteoarthritis. The mechanism of action differs
from the Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs since it is not related to the inhibition of Prostaglandins. Anti-
osteoarthritis and cartilage stimulating properties have been demonstrated in vivo and in animal models. Diacerein
and Rhein have been shown to inhibit the production of interleukin-I- beta by human monocytes and the effects of
the cytokine onchondrocytes in vivo. Diacerein in therapeutic dose inhibit the stimulation of interleukin-1 beta-
production and production of nitrous oxide. It also significantly reduces severity of pathological changes of
osteoarthritis compared to placebo and increases the expression of transforming growth factor TGF-beta-1 and TGF
beta-2 with potential cartilage repairing properties. From the literature, Diacerein is seemed to be a safe and
promising drug. This research work has been taken up to develop and validate simple, accurate, sensitive and cost-
effective methods for the estimation of Diacerein in dosage forms. A new LC method with UV detection was
developed for the quantitative determination of Diacerein in pharmaceutical dosage forms. The chromatographic
separation was performed on GPC column with a mobile phase of tetra hydro furan. A flow rate of 1.2ml/minute was
used. The resulting chromatogram exhibited a retention time of 5.784 minute. The limit of detection and limit of
quantification was found to be 0.5µg/m land 1µg/ml. A linearity range of 1-10µg/ml was established. The correlation
coefficient was found to be 1. 007. The results of analysis were treated statically, as per ICH guidelines for
validation of analytical procedures and by recovery studies. The results were found to be accurate and not much
interferences from capsule excipients. The active pharmaceutical ingredient was extracted from its finished dosage
forms using tetrahydrofuran. The percentage recovery was found to be 99.9%w/w.
Key words: Diacerein, Rhein, Gel permeation, HPLC, Linearity, Recovery etc
I. INTRODUCTION
Diacerein is an anthraquinone derivative that has been used in Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis is a common
disease in the ageing population and results from a complex interplay of genetic, metabolic, biochemical and
biomechanical factors with secondary local inflammation. The process involves the interaction of degradation and
repair of articular cartilage, bone and synovium. The most important cells in the entire process are the
chondrocytes1,2. Primary Osteoarthritis (OA) which can be either localized or generalized , most often idiopathic,
except in rare cases in which a defective gene has been found to cause a familial form of osteoarthritis 3,4.Diacerein
does not alter renal or platelet cyclooxygenase activity and may therefore be tolerated by patients with
prostaglandin dependent renal function5,6.Diacerein and Rhein have been shown to inhibit the production of inter
leukin-1 beta by human monocytes and the effects of the cytokine on chondrocytes in vivo7. They exert
chondroprotective effects in cultured articular cartilage and reduced severity of cartilage, bone and synovial
membrane damage in osteoarthritis8. Studies inhibit that diacerein does not block the synthesis of prostaglandins,
thromboxane of leukotrienes but may actually stimulate prostaglandin synthesis, especially PGF-2 alpha, a
prostaglandin with cytoprotective effect on the gastric mucosa9.10 .Janhavi Rao reported HPLC method of diacerein
in capsule dosage forms by isocratic separation was achieved using a perfect target OD-3,250X4.6 mm id columns
and using UV detection at254nm.The mobile phase was selected phosphate buffer: acetonitrile(40:60)ratio with pH
4.0.Kannappan N, at et al describes validation of Diacerein by High performance liquid chromatography(RP-HPLC)
method using Zorbax CN column and the mobile phases were selected Acetonitrile and buffer pH-3.5,None of the
method gives correct values recoveries(approx. 80.30-118.14%w/w) and there it is necessary a method having
simple, good precision, lack of errors, relevant values for estimation of Diacerein in solid dosage form.
Inference: The calibration curve was found to be linear in the concentration range of 2-10µg/ml.
STATISTICAL EVALUTION OF CALIBRATION PLOT
The data above was used to derive a regression equation of the peak area Y on the concentration X and peak height
Y on the concentration X by the principles of least squares and the equation is as follows.
Y=aX +b
Peak area wise
Linear regression Y=100730 +533229
Correlation coefficient was found to be 1.0007
Accuracy
The accuracy of an analytical procedure is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true value.
In a method with high accuracy, a sample whose true value is known is analysed and measured value should ideally
be identical to the true value. Accuracy was determined by carrying out a recovery study and the method was found
to be accurate.
Limit of detection (LOD)
The detection, limit of an individual analytical procedure is the smallest level of analyte that gives a
measurable response. The limit of detection of Diacerein by proposed method was found to be 0.5µg/m/
Method
The content of 20 capsules was accurately weighed and the average weight calculated. A weight of the
powder equivalent to 10 mg was accurately weighed out and transferred to a stoppered flask. Extracted three times
successively with 2.5ml of Tetrahydrofuran HPLC grade and filtered through Whatman No. filter paper and the
combined extract was then made up to 10 ml with Tetrahydrofuran. The resulting solution had a concentration of 1
mg/ml (Solution A). From the resulting solution, pipetted 1 ml in to another 10ml standard flask and made up to the
volume with Tetra hydro furan. The resulting solution had a concentration of 100µg/ml (Solution B). From the
solute on B, accurately pipetted out 0.4,0.6,0.8 ml and transferred to three 10 ml standard flask and made up to the
volume with Tetrahydrofuran. The final solutions had concentrations of 4,6,8µg/ml respectively.
The chromatogram was generated after injection of 20µl of each solution to the column, under the same
chromatographic conditions as mentioned above. The peak arears and peak heights obtained from the chromatogram
are tabulated.
Table.2: showing Calibration of Diacerein capsule
SL CONC Peak Peak Concentration Active Average
NO. µg/ml area height from calibration content/capsule Content/capsules
curve
CALCULATIONS:
Label Claim = 50 mg
Average weight of the capsule content = 0.3925 g
Weigh equivalent to 10 mg = 0.0785 g
Weight taken = 0.0785g
Average content of Diacerein determined by the proposed method = 49.9 mg
Percentage Label Claim = 49.9X 100
50 = 99.9 %W/W
Standard deviation =0.1529
Coefficient of variation= 0.3079
Standard error = 0.0882.
with Tetrahydrofuran. The resulting solution had a concentration of 1mg/ml (Solution A). From the resulting
solution pipetted 1 ml in to another 10 ml standard flask and made up to the volume with tetrahydro furan. The
resulting solution had a concentration of 100µg/ml (Solution B). From the solution B, accurately pipetted out
0.4,0.6,0, 0.8 ml and transferred to three 10 ml standard flask and made up to the volume with tetrahydrofuran. The
final solution had a concentration of 4,6,8µg/ml respectively. Chromatogram generated after injection 20µl each of
4,6, and 8µg/ml solution to column, under the same chromatographic conditions were evaluated and the peak area
obtained from the chromatogram are tabulated.
Table.3: showing Concentration v/s Peak area of Dy cerein
Serial No. Concentration Peak Area Percentage
(µg/ml) Standard Sample recovery
(Dyce rein)
1 4 360172 361368 100.3
2 6 492748 491588 99.8
3 8 749588 745895 99.5
CALCULATIONS
Weight equivalent of Diacerein in Capsule powder taken = 5 mg
Weight of Diacerein R.S taken = 5 mg
Total amount of Diacerein theoretically =10 mg
Average value of percentage Recovery = 99.87%
The following statistical parameters were evaluated
Standard deviation = 0.3512
Coefficient of variation = 0.3518
Standard error = 0.2028
Table.7:
COMPARISON OF THE PROPOSED METHOD WITH THE PUBLISHED METHOD
Method Content % Label % Recovery
(mg) claim
HPLC
49.9 99.90 99.85
Published method
a) Peak area wise 45.30 91.4 -
b) Peak height wise 45.96 92.2 -
suggest that the method may extended to determine the concentration of Diacerein in body fluids also, after
optimization of system parameters and revalidation.
V. CONCLUSION
The efficient development and validation of Analytical methods are critical elements in the development of
pharmaceuticals he desirable characteristics for an analytical method include high sensitivity and selectivity,
accuracy, precision and robustness.
The HPLC method demonstrated herein are applicable to the estimation of Diacerein in pure as well as in
existing dosage forms. In order to ensure that the data generated with each of the above methods are accurate and
precise, the experiments have been performed on calibrated equipment using suitable reference standards. To prove
and document the reliability of the methods, validation as per ICH guidelines has been carried out to a possible
extent.
The proposed HPLC method provides simple, accurate and reproducible quantitative method for routine in vitro
tests of Diacerein dosage forms. Finally, as mentioned no pharmacopoeial methods for determination of Diacerein in
dosage forms have been reported yet. Hence the proposed method can be considered as simple and specific method
for the estimation of Diacerein in pure and dosage forms.
HPLC
Diacerein 49.9 99.90 100.20 - 1-10 1.007 0.5
50 ±0.4500 µg/ml µg/ml
REFERENCES
[1]. Miller D.R, Osteoarthritis: Pharmacotherapy self-assessment program.4th Edition, American
College of Clinical Pharmacy 2007:225-227.
[2]. Christelle Boileau, Steeve Kwan Tat, Jean-Pierre Pelletier, Sarnette Cheng and Johnne Martel- Pelletier,
Arthritis Research &Therapy 2008,10, R71 doi:1186/ar2444.
[3]. http//www.Medlineindia.com /musculoskeletal/Diacerein.html.
[4]. APLAR, Journal of Rheumatology Volume 9, issue1, p.64-69.
[5]. www.ncbi.nih.gov/PubMed/11037895, html.
[6]. www.Jkscience.org/archive/volume83/Diacerein.html.
[7]. satoskar R.S, Bhandarkar S.D, Nirmala N, Rege, Pharmacology and pharmacotherapeutics: popular
Prakashan: Mumbai,2002.
[8]. Fidelix T.S, Soares B.G, Trivashani V.F, Diacerein for Osteoarthritis, Cochrane Data base
Syst.Rev.2006;(1):CD005117.
[9]. Reynolds J. E, Prasad B. A, Martindale-The extra Pharmacopoeia,30th Edition, pharm. press: London,1993,
pp-2.
[10]. http//www.cimasia.com.
[11]. Harry J Mycek, Richard A Harvey, Pamela C Champe, Pharmacology, second edition,475.
[12]. Merk index 13th edition. Merk &Co.2001,1228-1229.
[13]. Cartidin monograph-Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd.
[14]. N. Kannappan, Madhukar A.R, Srinivasan R, L.A Srinivas, C.H Naveen Kumar, Mannavalan - Analytical
method development and validation of Diacerein tablets by RP-HPLC.
[15]. Dycerin monograph Orbit life sciences, Pvt. Ltd.,
[16]. Wate S. P, Tajne A.M, Karande M, Dixit M.R, -Determination of Diacerein Glucosamine
In combined formulation.