King County Lawsuit Documents
King County Lawsuit Documents
17
COMES NOW Plaintiff King County (“King County” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its
18
attorneys of record, alleges and claims against Defendants as follows:
19
I. PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
20
1. Plaintiff, King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington as a
21
home rule charter county, is the owner of the real property in King County, Washington,
22
identified as Grand Ridge Park, Parcel Number 252406-9107 (“Plaintiff’s Property” or the
23
“Property”), which is the subject of this Complaint.
Leesa Manion (she/her)
COMPLAINT FOR TIMBER TRESPASS, Prosecuting Attorney
DAMAGES, PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND CIVIL DIVISION
701 5th Avenue, Suite 600
ENFORCEMENT OF PENALTIES - 1 Seattle, Washington 98104
(206) 477-1120/FAX (206) 296-0191
1 2. Defendants Vlad Popach and Jessica Popach are residents of King County,
2 Washington and own real property located in King County, Washington, which adjoins
3 Plaintiff’s Property. Defendants are believed to be husband and wife, agents of Defendant
4 Compass Real Estate, LLC and/or Compass Real Estate Investors Corp., and all acts or
5 omissions of either of them was done for the benefit of marital property.
6 3. Defendants Sam Cunningham and Laura Brice Cunningham are residents of King
7 County, Washington and own real property located in King County, Washington, which adjoins
8 Plaintiff’s Property. Defendants are believed to be husband and wife, agents of Defendant
9 Compass Real Estate, LLC and/or Compass Real Estate Investors Corp., and all acts or
10 omissions of either of them was done for the benefit of marital property.
12 registered agent and governor of Hsieh Investments Washington, III, LLC, a limited liability
13 company incorporated in the state of Washington that owns real property located in King
16 Cunningham, Laura Brice Cunningham, Julie Hsieh, and Hsieh Investments Washington, III,
18 6. Compass Real Estate, LLC is a limited liability company, incorporated in the state
19 of Washington, who employ or retain Defendants Vlad Popach, Sam Cunningham, and Laura
20 Brice Cunningham as agents of Compass Real Estate, LLC that offer their services within King
21 County, Washington.
2 contracted, paid, or requested to perform work on Plaintiff’s Property within King County,
3 Washington at the behest of the Neighbor Defendants collectively, or at the behest of one or
4 more of them individually, without authorization or permits from King County, but at this time
5 are currently unknown to the Plaintiff. These Defendants are hereinafter collectively referred to
7 9. Jane and John Does 1-20 may reside in King County, Washington, may have
8 hired Doe Company 1-10 or otherwise participated in the cutting and/or damaging of trees on
9 Plaintiff’s Property, or may themselves have cut or damaged trees on Plaintiff’s Property, but at
10 this time are currently unknown to the Plaintiff. These Defendants are hereinafter collectively
12 10. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims in this action.
13 11. The Court has personal jurisdiction over all defendants because this action arises
15 12. Venue is proper in this action because the property at issue is located within King
16 County, Washington and at least two of the defendants reside in King County, Washington.
18 13. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all of the allegations in the preceding
20 14. Plaintiff’s Property is part of Grand Ridge Park, a lush 1,200-acre forest in King
21 County, Washington, maintained as a natural resource preservation space for passive recreation
22 including hikers, equestrians, mountain bikers, naturalists, and other recreational activities and
23 environmental benefits.
2 located at 7050 270th Place Southeast, Issaquah, Washington 98029; King County Parcel
3 Number 2524069099.
4 16. Defendant Vlad Popach is a real estate agent or broker for Compass Real Estate,
5 LLC, Compass Real Estate Investment Corp, and/or Popach Real Estate, LLC.
6 17. Jessica Popach is the chief operating officer of the Popach Real Estate, LLC, a
7 limited liability corporation for Vlad Popach’s real estate business through Compass Real Estate,
9 18. Defendants Sam Cunningham and Laura Brice Cunningham are owners of real
10 property located at 7062 270th Place Southeast, Issaquah, Washington 98029; King County
12 19. Sam Cunningham and Laura Brice Cunningham are both real estate agents or
13 brokers for Compass Real Estate, LLC and/or Compass Real Estate Investment Corp.
14 20. Defendant Julie Hsieh purchased the real property 7070 270th Place Southeast,
15 Issaquah Washington 98029 through Hsieh Investments Washington III, LLC, which was
17 21. Defendant Hsieh Investments Washington III, LLC made an offer to purchase the
19 22. The purchase of 7070 270th Place Southeast, Issaquah, Washington 98029 by
20 Defendant Hsieh Investments Washington III, LLC closed on March 14, 2025.
21 23. Skyline Properties acted as agent for the seller and buyer of real property located
22 at 7070 270th Place Southeast, Issaquah Washington 98029, sold to Defendant Julie Hsieh
2 hired or contracted with Doe Company 1-10 to cut down, remove, top, trim, limb up, debark or
4 25. On or about March 22, 2025, Neighbor Defendants, and/or their agents, Doe
5 Company 1-10, and Jane and John Does 1-20 were observed entering onto Plaintiff’s Property
6 and performed unauthorized work by cutting down, removing, topping, trimming, limbing up,
7 debarking, felling, and otherwise damaging approximately one hundred and forty-two (142) trees
9 26. Of the approximately 142 affected trees, at least seventy-two (72) were limbed up,
10 forty-five (45) were cut, eighteen (18) were topped, and seven (7) others were damaged in a
11 combination of methods, including but not limited to being limbed up, cut and damaged, split
12 trunk, debarked, branches broken off, or topped and damaged; all of which are hereinafter
14 27. “Limbed up” refers to the damaging practice of removing lower branches on a
15 tree, leaving only the crown of the tree, which impacts the structural integrity of the tree,
17 28. Tree “topping” refers to the damaging practice of removing the central leader
18 branch of the tree’s crown, impacting the tree’s natural form, shortening the tree’s life, creates
19 higher probability of dangerous or hazardous trees, and often results in a slow death to the tree
20 itself.
21 29. “Debarking or stripping” refers to the damaging practice of removing tree bark
22 that reduces stability of the trees structure and exposes trees to more disease, pests, or other
23
3 30. The species of the Trees affected include, but are not limited to, Douglas Fir,
4 Western Redcedar, Sitka Spruce, Grand Fir, Western Hemlock, Madrone, and Big Leaf Maple
5 trees.
8 32. During the cutting of the Trees, at least one negligently felled tree flew down the
9 steep slope of Plaintiff’s Property at a high rate of speed and nearly crossed 272nd Avenue
10 Southeast, posing a risk of serious injury or death to innocent bystanding pedestrians and
11 vehicles.
12 33. As a result of the unauthorized removal and damage of the Trees, at least one of
13 the Neighbor Defendants has substantially improved their view of West Tiger Mountain. Upon
14 information and belief, other properties owned by Neighbor Defendants also now enjoy
16 34. At all times material to this action, Neighbor Defendants and/or Jane or John
17 Does 1-20 knew or should have known, that they, their agents, and Doe Company 1-10 did not
19 35. At all times material to this action, Neighbor Defendants and/or Jane or John
20 Does 1-20 knew or should have known that they, their agents, and Doe Company 1-10 did not
21 have the consent, permission, or authorization to enter Plaintiff’s Property, nor to cut down,
22 remove, top, trim, limb up, debark or strip, fell, or otherwise damage Trees on Plaintiff’s
23 Property.
2 Does 1-20 never sought any such consent, permission, permit, or authorization from Plaintiff to
3 cut down, remove, top, trim, limb up, debark or strip, fell, or otherwise damage Plaintiff’s Trees.
4 37. Plaintiff’s stewardship of Grand Ridge Park benefits all of King County and its
6 38. The cost to repair the damaged Trees includes, but is not limited to, debris
7 removal, habitat restoration, slope stabilization, tree and vegetation replanting and restoration,
10 Plaintiff’s Property and its dense forest to its previously undisturbed and mature state.
12 40. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all of the allegations in the preceding
15 42. Doe Company 1-10 knew or should have known that Plaintiff’s Property did not
17 43. In violation of RCW 64.12.030, Defendants’ or their agents cut down timber on
18 Plaintiff’s Property without lawful authority and are liable for timber trespass.
19 44. Defendants are responsible for the acts of their agents, contractors, or other
20 individuals who Defendants made arrangements with to remove, cut, or damage Plaintiff’s Trees.
21 45. Defendants’ or their agents’ actions have resulted in damages to Plaintiff, for
22 which Plaintiff is entitled to recover treble damages in an amount to be proven at trial because
23
2 stripping, felling, and otherwise damaging the Plaintiff’s Trees were not causal or involuntary.
3 46. Defendants’ or their agents’ actions have diminished the value of Plaintiff’s
5 47. The overall value of the Trees was preliminarily estimated at a value over two and
6 a third million dollars. The specific value of the Trees will be proven at trial, and those damages
8 48. The Plaintiff is entitled to damages, including but not limited to compensation for
9 the appraised loss of value of the Trees, restoration costs, loss of property value, emotional
10 damages, arborist fees, court costs, and all other allowed damages, all of which should be
13 49. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all of the allegations in the preceding
15 50. In violation of RCW 4.24.630, Defendants or their agents wrongfully cut down
16 Trees and vegetation on Plaintiff’s Property, resulting in damage to the land, understory, and
17 property itself.
19 damaging 142 Trees and other vegetation, they made landslides on a steep sloped property more
20 likely.
21 52. Defendants or their agents knew or should have known that they were not
22 authorized to cut, remove, top, trim, limb up, debark or strip, fell, or otherwise damage the Trees
23
2 slope integrity.
3 53. Defendants’ actions have resulted in damages to Plaintiff, for which Plaintiff is
5 54. Plaintiff is entitled to damages to the land resulting from the cutting, including but
6 not limited to the costs associated with restoration of the land, reestablishing slope integrity over
7 many years, animal habitat restoration, and reasonable costs including investigation costs,
10 55. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates herein the preceding paragraphs of this
12 56. Defendants or their agents entered without permission onto Plaintiff’s Property
13 and caused damage thereto by cutting, removing, topping, trimming, limbing up, debarking or
15 57. Defendants’ or their agents’ actions have resulted in damages to the Plaintiff, for
16 which Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages to be proven at trial as well as the costs of this
19 58. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates herein the preceding paragraphs of this
21 59. Defendants or their agents owe Plaintiff a duty to refrain from the acts herein
22 alleged, including duties to refrain from cutting, removing, topping, trimming, limbing up,
23 debarking or stripping, felling, and otherwise damaging the Plaintiff’s Trees. Defendants or their
2 up, debark or strip, fell, or otherwise damage Trees in a King County Park that they did not own,
3 breached their duty, and proximately caused injury and damage to Plaintiff’s Trees and Property.
2 Defendants are also subject to the additional civil penalty at an amount determined by the King
3 County Department of Natural Resources for the redress of ecological, recreational, and
4 economic values lost or damaged due to their unlawful action under KCC 23.32.040 or at an
5 amount of the economic benefit derived by the violation, including but not limited to any
6 increased value of their homes in unlawfully creating improved views of West Tiger Mountain.
8 67. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates herein the preceding paragraphs of this
11 permanently enjoined from coming upon the Plaintiff’s Property, or cutting or otherwise
12 damaging any trees or vegetation located on the Plaintiff’s Property, or from committing
15 69. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend its Complaint pursuant to CR 15.
23
4 agents, representatives, tenants, or contractors from coming upon the Plaintiff’s Property, cutting
7 D. Awarding Plaintiff reasonable attorney’s fees and litigation costs, including the
8 expense of hiring a Certified Arborist and Surveyor to assess the damage caused by the
9 Defendants or their agents, provided by RCW 4.24.630 or other such statutes and authority upon
11 E. Awarding Plaintiff any additional statutory fees and costs permitted by law;
12 F. Awarding Plaintiff any additional damages or relief, including all relevant civil
13 penalties allowed under King County Code, other damages permitted by law, or that the Court
15
23