Catalysis 8.9 Organocatalysis C4cy00033a
Catalysis 8.9 Organocatalysis C4cy00033a
Science &
Technology
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
4, 2708
Sergio Rossi, Maurizio Benaglia,* Elisabetta Massolo and Laura Raimondi
One of the most important chemical transformations is the reduction of multiple bonds, carbon–carbon as
well as carbon–heteroatom double bonds, since it leads very often to the generation of new stereocenters
in the molecule. The replacement of metal-based catalysts with equally efficient metal-free counterparts is
very appealing in view of possible future applications of non toxic, low cost, and environmentally friendly
promoters on an industrial scale. This perspective will focus specially, but not exclusively, on the enantio-
selective reduction of the carbon nitrogen double bond; despite the historical need for and continued interest
in chiral amines, their synthesis remains challenging. Three metal-free catalytic methodologies available for
the reduction of carbon–nitrogen double bond will be discussed: i) binaphthol-derived phosphoric acids catalyzed
Received 10th January 2014, reductions, with dihydropyridine-based compound as the reducing agent; ii) trichlorosilane mediated reductions,
Accepted 2nd April 2014
in the presence of catalytic amounts of chiral Lewis bases; iii) metal-free hydrogenation of imines through FLP
(Frustrated Lewis Pair) methodology, that involves the use of a combination of a strong Lewis acid with a variety
DOI: 10.1039/c4cy00033a
of sterically encumbered Lewis bases, for examples phosphines or tertiary amines, to activate hydrogen at
www.rsc.org/catalysis ambient conditions. Special attention will be devoted to the most recent applications of the last five years.
2708 | Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
technologies such as asymmetric hydrogenation.1 As stereo- multiple bonds, carbon–carbon as well as carbon–nitrogen
selective methodologies develop over time, declining costs double bonds, since it leads very often to the generation of
enable companies to access public-domain technologies. new stereocenters in the molecule. The outcome of a reduc-
Enantioselective catalysis has witnessed increased activity tion process is therefore the production of different stereo-
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
in terms of extensive academic and industrial investment. isomers and the control of the reaction, in the attempt to
Industries are keen on further growth in the market for obtain preferentially one stereoisomer over the others, which
“chiral technologies”, as new processes and reactions are dis- requires the use of a “chiral technology”. The replacement of
covered and applied in pharmaceutical synthesis. Further- metal-based catalysts with equally efficient metal-free counter-
more, the rising complexity of new chemical entities calls parts is very appealing in view of possible applications in the
for the evolution of advanced catalytic chemo- and stereo- future of non toxic, low cost, and environmentally friendly
selective technologies.2 promoters on industrial scale.
Open Access Article. Published on 04 April 2014. Downloaded on 4/18/2024 5:10:48 PM.
Indeed, the importance of catalysis to the pharmaceutical The perspective will focus specially, but not exclusively, on
industry has steadily increased over the past two decades.3 the enantioselective reduction of the carbon–nitrogen double
Catalysis in pharmaceutical R&D has been attracting con- bond. Despite the historical need for and continued interest
tinuously increasing attention due to increasing regulatory in chiral amines, their synthesis remains challenging.7 This
requirements that force companies to develop and study is especially true in the context of introducing nitrogen into
single-enantiomer drugs, environmental protection laws and a pharmaceutical compound, with all its complexity and
the pressure to reduce drug development cost and time; the multifunctionality, or into an advanced intermediate via an
picture is completed by the continued discovery of new prac- operationally simple, preferably one-step, procedure allowing
tical catalysts from both academia and industry, that make high chemo-, regio-, diastereo-, and enantiocontrol. It is obvi-
available possible new solutions for production.4 Catalysis is ous that catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation of prochiral
one of the solutions that companies are exploring to address unsaturated compounds, such as olefins, ketones, and imines,
the problem of the increasing complexity of chemical targets. has been intensively studied and is considered a versatile
The average number of manipulations required to synthesize method for access to chiral compounds. However, stereo-
an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) continues to grow selective hydrogenation of carbon–nitrogen double bonds,
and currently amounts to an average of 12 synthetic steps. including those inserted in heteroaromatic compounds, is
Finally catalysis plays a fundamental role in companies’ much less explored, presumably because of different prob-
strategies aimed to set up a second generation process to lems, the main being the deactivation and/or poisoning of
develop environmentally favorable API manufacturing pro- catalysts by compounds containing nitrogen and sulfur atoms.
cesses, without compromising the safety, efficacy and quality Despite the difficulties cited above, the search for catalysts
of the final product.5 enabling efficient asymmetric hydrogenation of aromatic/
In this context, the advent of organocatalysis6 brought heteroaromatic compounds continues and it is driven by the
new attractive possibilities, to realize stereoselective cata- prospect of straightforward and efficient routes to optically
lytic synthesis of complex chiral molecules, bearing several active saturated or partially saturated chiral heterocyclic com-
functional groups, with metal-free processes. One of the most pounds.8 On the other hand enantioselective, metal-catalyzed
important chemical transformations is the reduction of hydrogenations suffer from other drawbacks: catalysts are
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 | 2709
View Article Online
2710 | Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 | 2711
View Article Online
2712 | Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 | 2713
View Article Online
the ester R′′ group; high e.e. were obtained for substrates
bearing bulky ester groups such as i-Pr and t-Bu, whereas only
33% e.e. was observed for the methyl ester substrate. As for
the scope of R′, several substituted phenyl isopropyl esters
containing either electron-donating or electron-withdrawing
groups all led to good yields and excellent e.e. (Scheme 7).
However, a low reactivity was observed in the case of the alkyl-
Open Access Article. Published on 04 April 2014. Downloaded on 4/18/2024 5:10:48 PM.
2714 | Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
Scheme 9 Catalytic oxidative kinetic resolution of indolines. enantioselectivities and with analogous mechanism. How-
ever, the mechanistic picture is quite different in the case of
3-substituted quinolones. The key step of the transfer hydro-
In contrast, the steric hindrance between the 3,3′-substituents genation of 3-substituted quinolines is the enantioselective
of the chiral phosphoric acid and the two aryl groups of the protonation of the intermediary enamine, which, after 1,2-hydride
substrates destabilizes the other possible transition states. addition, leads to 3-substituted tetrahydroquinolines with good
The phosphoric-acid-catalysed methodology was success- enantioselectivities (Scheme 10).36a Moreover, the strategy was
fully used also in the reduction of CN bonds of heterocyclic successful also in the reduction of 2,3-substituted quinolines,
systems. Examples of efficient catalysts for the asymmetric which allowed isolation of the octahydroacridine in good yield
hydrogenation of aromatic and heteroaromatic compounds and with excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivities.36b
are quite rare, even amongst the chiral Rh, Ru, and Ir com- At the end of this section it is worth mentioning that chi-
plexes. It was therefore an important breakthrough the ral phosphoric acids have been employed also for CO and
development by Rueping's group in 2006 of an enantioselective CC bonds stereoselective reductions. About the carbonyl
organocatalytic partial reduction of quinoline derivatives34 reduction, in 2011, Antilla reported the first example of
which are of great synthetic importance in the preparation of enantioselective reduction of ketones catalyzed by a chiral
pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals, as well a structural key phosphoric acid derivative.37 The reduction of variously
element of many alkaloids. This represented the first exam- substituted acetophenones with catecholborane promoted by
ple of a metal-free reduction of heteroaromatic compounds. a series of BINOL-derived phosphoric acids gave the desired
After screening of a variety of sterically congested phosphoric product with only modest enantioselectivity, catalyst 8 being
acids, (R)-(−)-9-phenanthryl-1,1′-binaphthyl-2,2′-diyl hydrogen- the best performing one.
phosphate was selected as catalyst of choice to generate However, it was found that an increase in the enantio-
2-phenyltetrahydroquinoline in 97% e.e. (Scheme 10). meric excess could be obtained by lowering the reaction tem-
The first step in the enantioselective cascade hydrogena- perature to −20 °C and by using 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine
tion is the protonation of quinoline through a Brønsted acid (DMAP) as an additive; this pyridine derivative is likely to
catalyst to generate the iminium ion, followed by the transfer form the corresponding pyridium phosphate salt, a very weak
of the first hydride from dihydropyridine to generate the cor- acid (species 13, Scheme 11). The substrates bearing either
responding enamine, which reacts in a second cycle with the electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups on the phe-
nyl ring furnished the resulting chiral alcohols with good
selectivity; labile functional groups, such as nitrile, nitro,
ester, iodide and bromide, were generally well tolerated.
The boron center is believed to act as a Lewis acid to acti-
vate the carbonyl, while the PO moiety can act as a Lewis
base to increase the nucleophilicity of catecholborane. Simulta-
neously, the hydride from unreacted catecholborane is added
to the activated carbonyl under the influence of a chiral envi-
ronment to form the hydroboration product and regenerate
the catalyst.
Regarding CC reductions, the reduction of unsaturated
carbonyl derivatives was already described in 2006. The organic
salt of (R)-3,3′-bis(2,4,6-triisopropylphenyl)-1,1′-binaphthyl-2,2′-diyl
hydrogen phosphate 8 (TRIP) and morpholine was able to
promote transfer hydrogenation via Hantzsch dihydropyridine
of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes with high levels of enantio-
selectivity, ranging between 96% and >98% e.e. (Scheme 12).38
Scheme 10 Enantioselective reduction of heterocycles. The reaction proceeds via an iminium ion intermediate since
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 | 2715
View Article Online
(Scheme 12).40
The combination of (R)-(TRIP) (acid 8) and valine was
selected as best performing catalyst; the effect of the amino
acid seems to be important as corresponding glycine derived
catalyst gave significantly reduced enantioselectivity, as well
as the reaction promoted by the phosphoric acid alone.
When the opposite enantiomeric counteranion ((S)-TRIP) was
Open Access Article. Published on 04 April 2014. Downloaded on 4/18/2024 5:10:48 PM.
used, the same major enantiomer was formed but with much
lower enantioselectivity, thus demonstrating the existence of
a matched/mismatched catalyst–ion pair combination effect.
2716 | Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
role in determining the stereoselectivity of the catalyst, and imines and ketones in the presence of trichlorosilane.52
bulkier groups in the 3,5-positions of the aromatic ring Secondary alcohols could be synthesized with high enantio-
(diisopropyl and di-tert-butyl) have a positive effect on the selectivity (up to 97%) employing a catalytic amount of
enantioselectivity of the process. In the proposed transition N-formyl-α′-(2,4,6-triethylphenyl)-(S)-proline (catalyst 17). The
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
state coordination of the silicon atom by the two carboxyamide selection of the best performing compound was the result of
groups guarantees chemical activation of the reducing agent, the screening of a series of α′-arylproline derivatives. Both the
whereas the formation of a hydrogen-bond between the sec- carbonyl group at the α-position and a 2,4,6-triethylphenyl
ondary amide group of the catalyst and the substrate repre- group at the 5 position in the proline ring are crucial in
sents an element of stereocontrol. The N-aryl group is believed determining the high enantioselectivity. In a closely related
to play an important role in the stereocontrol because it should work,53 our group reported a similar use of chiral amino acids,
be involved in π–π stacking interaction between the catalyst whose ability to form hydrogen bonds with the substrate pro-
Open Access Article. Published on 04 April 2014. Downloaded on 4/18/2024 5:10:48 PM.
and the substrate (Scheme 13). The general applicability of vides an easy route to induce enantioselectivity. This approach
catalyst 14, known as Sigamide, was then successfully investi- was applied for the first time to the HSiCl3 mediated reduction
gated in the reduction of multifunctionalized ketimines bear- of carbon–nitrogen double bonds employing proline-derived
ing heterocyclic and aliphatic moieties.45 Lewis bases as catalysts (catalyst 18, Scheme 13), leading to
The popularity of this catalytic species is demonstrated high chemical yields and enantiomeric excess up to 75%. It is
also by the development of immobilized versions of 14 on important to point out that in 2009 Schreiner published a
different supports, in order to realize a recoverable system. detailed investigation of the influence that non aromatic
Heterogeneous materials were employed; Merrifield, Wang, groups in N-formylprolinamide may have on the enantio-
TentaGel and Marshall resins, were all employed to immobilize meric excesses of ketoimine reductions, also employing com-
the organocatalysts through an ethereal bond (catalyst type 15).46 putational methods in the attempt to get some mechanistic
By operating under the best experimental conditions, with the insights in the process.54 By working with a series of novel
Merrifield-anchored catalyst, the product was isolated in good chiral organocatalysts derived from proline, valine, and
yield and in an e.e. about 10% lower than the enantio- pipecolinic acid, the dominant role of the amino acid scaffold
selectivity obtained with the non-supported catalyst. Other in the enantiodifferentiating step was demonstrated. DFT
recovery strategies have been employed, including the use of mechanistic studies seem to confirm that the catalyst not only
gold nanoparticles,47 block polymethacrylate polymers48 and coordinates to trichlorosilane, but also reacts as a proton donor
a fluorous tag.49 in the crucial transition structure; indeed, the importance of
Later Sun and co-workers developed a N-formyl derivative the presence of acidic NH proton of a secondary amide group,
of (S)-pipecolinic acid (catalyst 16), able to promote the able to bind to the basic nitrogen of the reacting imine, has
reduction of N-aryl ketimines with trichlorosilane with high been demonstrated. Although the authors suggest that the
yields and good enantioselectivities.50 Switching from the stereoselective steps for proline, pipecolinic acid and valine-
five-membered ring of proline to a six-membered ring had a derived catalysts may be different, from computational studies
beneficial effect on enantioselectivity. The reduction of ali- they propose a general picture for the catalytic reduction of
phatic ketoimines51 was also accomplished in this work, where ketoimines with trichlorosilane, that could be described as a
the independence of the imine geometry on the selectivity of formal H+/H− transfer to the CN double bond. However other,
the reaction was demonstrated. more refined computational studies are needed to elucidate
It is interesting to note that in 2006 Matsumura reported further the mechanism of these reactions.
the activity of N-formyl proline derivatives in the reduction of A contribution by Matsumura in 2006 opened the way
towards the development of a novel class of catalysts for
trichlorosilane-mediated reductions, derived from chiral amino
alcohols, showing that N-picolinoylpyrrolidine derivatives were
able to activate trichlorosilane in the reduction of aromatic
imines.55 Catalyst 19 gave the best results, leading to enantio-
selectivities up to 80%. The authors proposed that both the
nitrogen atom of the picolinoyl group and the carbonyl oxygen
were involved in the coordination and activation of silicon
atoms. Based on these seminal works, our group has recently
focused on the design and synthesis of a wide class of catalysts
prepared by simple condensation of a chiral aminoalcohol
with picolinic acid derivatives. We56 and Zhang57 reported
independently in a preliminary communication the use of
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine-derived picolinamides in
the reduction of N-aryl and N-benzyl ketimines promoted by
trichlorosilane. The pyridine ring, the free hydroxyl group
Scheme 13 Enantioselective HSiCl3-mediated reductions of ketoimines. and N-alkyl substitution in the aminoalcohol portion were
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 | 2717
View Article Online
identified as key structural elements, necessary to secure good imidazole catalyst 21 derived from prolinol.59 This was
stereocontrol; the presence of two stereogenic centers on the employed in the reduction of a wide range of aromatics and
aminoalcohol moiety with the correct relative configuration, aliphatics ketimines with just 1 mol% of catalyst and a short
as in (1R,2S)-(−)-ephedrine, as well as of the methyl groups on reaction time, obtaining up to 96% yield and 87% e.e. The
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
the amide nitrogen and on the stereocenter in position 2 of same catalyst was then reported for the high selective reduc-
the amino alcohol chain are also necessary to direct efficiently tive amination of a large variety of ketones and aryl or ali-
the stereochemistry of the imine attack by trichlorosilane. In phatic amines.60
the proposed stereoselection model (Scheme 14), leading However the search for novel enantiomerically pure Lewis
to the experimentally observed preferred formation of the bases able to act as catalysts in enantioselective reduction pro-
R isomer of the product, the steric interaction between the cesses is endless. For example in Fig. 2 new organocatalysts,
pyridine ring and N-aryl group is much less significant than based on a different chiral scaffold developed by Malkov and
Open Access Article. Published on 04 April 2014. Downloaded on 4/18/2024 5:10:48 PM.
that observed in the model leading to the opposite enantio- Kočovský were reported. Chiral oxazolines containing isoquinoline
mer. 4-Bromo and 4-chloro picolinic derivatives showed 22 were employed in the reduction of both aromatic ketones
remarkable catalytic properties. Working at 0 °C with catalyst and imines with trichlorosilane.61 The best enantiomeric excess
20 the chiral amine was obtained in quantitative yield and reached in the reduction of ketones was 87%, while even better
88% enantiomeric excess; a further improvement was results were achieved in the ketimines’ reduction (92% e.e.).
observed by performing the reaction at −20 °C: enantio- The authors hypothesized coordination of trichlorosilane by
selectivity reached 95% e.e. and at the same time no erosion the catalyst would generate a hexacoordinated silicon species
of the chemical yield was observed, with the reduction that would act as the actual reducing species. When a ketone
product isolated in quantitative yield. Even by working with a is the reactive substrate, further activation would be provided
1% mol amount, catalyst 20 promoted the reduction in 90% by coordination of a molecule of trichlorosilane by the car-
yield after only 2 hours. Good results were also obtained in bonyl oxygen.
the enantioselective reduction of N-alkyl imines, a transforma- Almost at the same time, Sun published a novel catalyst
tion only recently accomplished organocatalytically. featuring a sulfinamide group as the stereocontrolling ele-
A very convenient enantioselective organocatalytic three- ment.62 This family of organocatalysts was found to be able
component methodology was also developed; the reductive to activate trichlorosilane for the stereoselective reduction of
amination process, starting simply from a mixture of a N-aryl ketimines with good yields and enantioselectivities,
ketone and an aryl amine, opens an easy access to chiral catalyst 23 being the most successful compound in terms of
amines with a straightforward experimental methodology. stereoselection. Based on the assumption that the mecha-
The hydrosilylation of a range of substrates derived from nism would involve two molecules of Lewis base for the acti-
(R)-1-phenylethylamine was also examined (eq. (b), Scheme 14). vation of HSiCl3, a novel chiral bis-sulfinamide was then
When chiral picolinamide 20 was employed as a catalyst, the developed.63 After a screening of different derivatives, the
control of the stereoselectivity was total, as demonstration of compound of choice was found to be a bis-sulfinamide bear-
the presence of a cooperative effect between the Lewis basic ing a five-methylene linkage. Catalyst 24 promoted the reduc-
catalyst and the (R)-methyl benzyl residue at the imine nitro- tion of the model substrate, N-phenylimine of acetophenone,
gen.58 The approach was extended to the synthesis of several with 96% e.e. (Fig. 2).
enantiomerically pure secondary amines with C1 or C2 sym- The success of the trichlorosilane-mediated reduction meth-
metry. Also the imine derived from methyl isopropyl ketone odology is demonstrated by its application to the reduction of
was readily reduced in >98% yield, to afford an enantio- different classes of compounds, leading to the formation of
merically pure direct precursor of (R)-isopropyl methyl amine. highly functionalized chiral molecules. Indeed trichlorosilane
At the same time Jones reported the use of the N-methyl was used to reduce both α-and β-imino esters (Scheme 15).
Zhang recently reported the first highly efficient protocol
for the organocatalytic synthesis of α-amino esters.64 Notably
the prolinol-derived catalyst of choice, compound 25, exhibited
only moderate enantioselectivities in the hydrosilylation of
N-aryl β-enamino esters, but promoted the reduction of α-imino
esters with high enantioselectivities (up to 93% e.e.). The
introduction of a bulky group at C4 of the pyrrolidine ring
Scheme 14 Chiral picolinamides in HSiCl3-mediated enantioselective Fig. 2 Chiral Lewis bases in trichlorosilane-mediated enantioselective
reductions. reductions.
2718 | Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
was decisive in order to obtain high stereoselectivities. The were reduced in high yields and enantioselectivities typically
addition of small quantities of pentanoic acid was crucial for ranging from 90% to 95%.68 It is worth mentioning that
the efficiency of the process. N-acyl β-enamino esters were totally inactive in the present
More studies have been performed on the reduction of organocatalytic system. The reaction is supposed to proceed
β-imino esters. N-Sulfinyl L-proline amide 26 has been used for through the imine tautomer rather than its enamine counter-
the enantioselective reduction of a range of N-alkyl β-enamino part. In the proposed mechanism the nitrogen atom of the
esters.65 The use of water as an additive proved to be crucial pyridine ring and the carbonyl oxygen atom of the catalyst
to obtain high levels of reactivity and enantioselectivity, accel- are coordinated to HSiCl3, while the imine is activated by the
erating the enamine–imine tautomerization and increasing hydroxyl group of the Lewis base through hydrogen bonding.
the electrophilicity of the imine through protonation of the More recent studies from this group have focused on
nitrogen atom. At the same time our group employed success- α-substituted-β-enamino esters. It should be mentioned that
fully ephedrine-derived catalyst 20 to reduce a series of N-benzyl a few years ago catalyst 14 had been used to develop a new
and N-α-methylbenzyl-β-enaminoesters. Then, hydrogenolysis protocol for the enantioselective synthesis of β-aminoacids
of the enantiomerically enriched N-benzyl-β-aminoesters, followed derivatives from enamine precursors.69 Treatment of the
by LDA-promoted ring closure, afforded enantiomerically pure β-ketoester or β-ketonitrile with p-anisidine afforded enamines,
4-aryl or 4-alkyl substituted β-lactams.66 Furthermore, we reported which as such cannot be reduced by HSiCl3. Since the
a novel class of chiral prolinol derivatives to promote the enamine–imine equilibration is facilitated by Brønsted acids,
hydrosilylation of α-imino and β-imino esters.67 In nearly all a number of acid additives were examined, among which
cases, catalyst 27 was the most effective in the reduction of a AcOH (one mol equivalent) emerged as a good compromise
range of electron rich and electron deficient substrates. Good between reactivity and selectivity. Enamine was reduced to give
results were obtained also with catalyst 28 at −30 °C for 48 h. the amino ester in high yield and 89% e.e. More recently, a
In the presence of 10 mol% of Lewis base, β-enamino esters novel class of chiral Lewis base catalysts, prepared from a readily
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 | 2719
View Article Online
available chiral source, was developed by Zhang (catalyst 29).70 methodology is the addition of one equivalent of water to
A wide variety of N-aryl β-aryl and -heteroaryl substrates were react with HSiCl3 to generate a controlled amount of strong
reduced in very good yields (up to 98%) and selectivity (up to Brønsted acid, HCl. In this way the reaction proceeds through
99 : 1 syn/anti and 99% e.e.). This methodology was used in the the generation of electrophilic indolenium ions by C3 proton-
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
synthesis under very mild reaction conditions of both the ation with the in situ formed HCl, and subsequent chiral
taxol C13 side chain and of a potent hypocholesterolemic agent; Lewis base 31 catalyzed enantioselective hydrosilylation with
the removal of water and oxygen from the reaction system was HSiCl3 (Scheme 16). The same group has recently studied the
not necessary, suggesting the generation of a Brønsted acid reduction of 3-aryl-1,4-benzooxazines,73 that compares favor-
that promoted enamine tautomerisation. Lewis base-catalyzed ably with the phosphoric acid-based approach. The catalyst of
asymmetric hydrosilylation of α-acetamido-β-enamino esters was choice was found to be the N-sulfinyl L-phenylalanine derived
also reported in the presence of catalyst 30, to afford amide 32, which allowed the production of a broad range of
Open Access Article. Published on 04 April 2014. Downloaded on 4/18/2024 5:10:48 PM.
smoothly the corresponding products with high yields (up to 3-substituted 3,4-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzooxazines in very good
99%), excellent enantioselectivities (up to 98% e.e.) and chemical yield and high enantioselectivity, even with a low
moderate diastereoselectivities (up to 80 : 20 d.r.).71 The lower catalyst loading (2 mol%). A stereochemical match between
diastereocontrol observed in this study is ascribed by the the carbon and the sulfur stereogenic centers is crucial for the
authors to the role of the hydrogen of the α-acetamide group. enantiocontrol. The stereoselective synthesis of chiral hetero-
Indeed, the enamine isomerization forms preferentially the cyclic building blocks such as dihydrobenzodiazepinones was
E-imine; however in this case the Z-imine can be stabilized also accomplished, by using picolinamides 25.74 The corre-
by hydrogen bonding between the hydrogen of the sponding products were obtained in excellent yields (up to 99%)
α-acetamide group and the nitrogen of the imine. In this and enantioselectivities (up to 98%).
way, considerable amounts of Z-imine could be generated,
resulting in lowers levels of diastereoselectivity. 5. Outlook and perspectives
Finally it is worth mentioning that the methodology has
been already applied to the reductions of heterocyclic sys- The advent of organocatalysis brought new attractive possi-
tems. For example, Sun reported the first direct enantio- bilities, to realize stereoselective catalytic synthesis of com-
selective hydrosilylation of prochiral 1H-indoles by combined plex chiral molecules, even bearing several functional groups,
Brønsted acid/Lewis base activation.72 The key factor for this with metal-free processes. The enantioselective organocatalytic
2720 | Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 | 2721
View Article Online
T. Mahdi, Z. Heiden, S. Grimme and D. W. Stephan, J. Am. 38 S. Mayer and B. List, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45,
Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 4088–4091. 4193–4195.
21 Reviews: (a) K. Brak and E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem., Int. 39 J. W. Wang, M. T. Hechavarria Fonseca and B. List,
Ed., 2013, 52, 534–561; (b) M. Mahlau and B. List, Angew. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 6660–6662. Immediately
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 518–533. after, reduction of β,β-disubstituted aldehydes was described,
22 For recent reviews see: (a) T. Akiyama, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, see: J. W. Wang, M. T. Hechavarria Fonseca and B. List,
5744–5758; (b) M. Terada, Synthesis, 2010, 12, 1929–1982; (c) Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 108–110; S. G. Ouellet,
J. Yu, F. Shi and L. Gong, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, J. B. Tuttle and D. W. C. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1156–1171; (d) For mechanistic studies, see: C. Zheng and 2005, 127, 32–33.
S.-L. You, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 2498–2518; (e) L. Simon 40 N. J. A. Martin and B. List, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128,
and J. M. Goodman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 8741–8747; 13368–13369.
Open Access Article. Published on 04 April 2014. Downloaded on 4/18/2024 5:10:48 PM.
T. Marcelli, P. Hammar and F. Himo, Chem. – Eur. J., 41 Review: M. Benaglia, S. Guizzetti and L. Pignataro, Coord.
2008, 14, 8562–8571. Chem. Rev., 2008, 252, 492–512. For a comprehensive review
23 M. Rueping, E. Sugiono, C. Azap, T. Theissmann and on Lewis bases see: S. E. Denmark and G. L. Beutner, Angew.
M. Bolte, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 3781–3784. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 1560–1638.
24 S. Hoffmann, A. M. Seayad and B. List, Angew. Chem., Int. 42 (a) S. Guizzetti and M. Benaglia, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
Ed., 2005, 44, 7424–7427. 2010, 5529; (b) S. Jones and C. J. A. Warner, Org. Biomol.
25 R. I. Storer, D. E. Carrera, Y. Ni and D. W. C. MacMillan, Chem., 2012, 10, 2189–2200.
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 84–86. 43 F. Iwasaki, O. Onomura, K. Mishima, T. Maki and
26 T. B. Nguyen, H. Bousserouel, Q. Wang and F. Guéritte, Y. Matsumura, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 7507–7511.
Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 4705–4707. 44 A. V. Malkov, A. Mariani, K. N. MacDougal and P. Kočovský,
27 G. Li and J. C. Antilla, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 1075–1078. Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 2253–2256.
28 Q. Kang, Z. Zhao and S. You, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2007, 349, 45 A. V. Malkov, M. Figlus, S. Stončius and P. Kočovský, J. Org.
1657–1660. Chem., 2009, 74, 5839–5849.
29 G. Li, Y. Liang and J. C. Antilla, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 46 A. V. Malkov, M. Figlus and P. Kočovský, J. Org. Chem.,
5830–5831. 2008, 73, 3985–3995.
30 D. Enders, A. Rembiak and B. A. Stockel, Adv. Synth. Catal., 47 A. V. Malkov, M. Figlus, G. Cooke, S. T. Caldwell, G. Rabani,
2013, 355, 1937–1942. M. R. Prestly and P. Kočovský, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7,
31 S. Hoffmann, M. Nicoletti and B. List, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1878–1883.
2006, 128, 13074–13075. 48 M. Figlus, S. T. Caldwell, D. Walas, G. Yesilbag, G. Cooke,
32 V. N. Wakchaure, J. Zhou, S. Hoffmann and B. List, Angew. P. Kočovský, A. V. Malkov and A. Sanyal, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 4612–4614. 2010, 8, 137–141.
33 K. Saito, Y. Shibata, M. Yamanaka and T. Akiyama, J. Am. 49 A. V. Malkov, M. Figlus, S. Stoncius and P. Kočovský, J. Org.
Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 11740–11743. Chem., 2007, 72, 1315–1325.
34 M. Rueping, A. P. Antonchick and T. Theissmann, Angew. 50 Z. Wang, X. Ye, S. Wei, P. Wu, A. Zhang and J. Sun, Org. Lett.,
Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 3683–3686. 2006, 8, 999–1002.
35 M. Rueping and A. P. Antonchick, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 51 S. Guizzetti, M. Benaglia and G. Celentano, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2007, 46, 4562–4565. 2009, 3683–3687.
36 (a) M. Rueping, T. Theissmann, S. Raja and J. W. Bats, Adv. 52 Y. Matsumura, K. Ogura, Y. Kouchi, F. Iwasaki and
Synth. Catal., 2008, 350, 1001–1006. For a recent contribution O. Onomura, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 3789–3792.
on the reduction of benzodiazepinones see: M. Rueping, 53 M. Bonsignore, M. Benaglia, L. Raimondi, M. Orlandi and
E. Merino and R. Koenigs, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2010, 352, G. Celentano, Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 2013, 9, 633–640.
2629–2634; (b) other selected recent contributions for the 54 Z. Zhang, P. Rooshenas, H. Hausmann and P. R. Schreiner,
same group: M. Rueping, C. Brinkmann, A. P. Antonchick and Synthesis, 2009, 9, 1531–1544.
I. Atodiresei, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 4604; M. Rueping, E. Sugiono, 55 O. Onomura, Y. Kouchi, F. Iwasaki and Y. Matsumura,
A. Steck and T. Theissmann, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2010, 352, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47, 3751–3754.
281–287; M. Rueping, B. J. Nachtsheim, R. M. Koenigs and 56 S. Guizzetti and M. Benaglia, European Patent, Application
W. Ieawsuwan, Chem. – Eur. J., 2010, 16, 13116–13126; (c) For November 30 2007; PCT/EP/2008/010079, WO2009068284,
other recent works in the field of reduction of heteroaromatic Nov. 27, 2008; S. Guizzetti, M. Benaglia, R. Annunziata and
systems see, among others: J. Zhou and B. List, J. Am. Chem. F. Cozzi, Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 6354–6363.
Soc., 2007, 129, 7498–7499; Z.-Y. Han, H. Xiao and L.-Z. Gong, 57 H. Zheng, J. Deng, W. Lin and X. Zhang, Tetrahedron Lett.,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2009, 19, 3729–3733; Q. Yin, 2007, 48, 7934–7937.
S. G. Wang and S. L. You, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 2688–2691. 58 S. Guizzetti, M. Benaglia and S. Rossi, Org. Lett., 2009, 11,
37 Z. Zhang, P. Jain and J. C. Antilla, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2928–2931.
2011, 50, 10961–10964. See also: D. Enders, A. Rembiak and 59 F. M. Gautier, S. Jones and S. J. Martin, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
M. Seppelt, Tetrahedron Lett., 2013, 54, 470–473. 2009, 7, 229–231.
2722 | Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
60 S. Jones and X. Li, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 69 A. V. Malkov, S. Stončius, K. Vranková, M. Arndt and
7860–7866. P. Kočovský, Chem. – Eur. J., 2008, 14, 8082–8085.
61 A. V. Malkov, A. J. P. S. Liddon, P. Ramírez-López, 70 Y. Jiang, X. Chen, Y. Zheng, Z. Xue, C. Shu, W. Yuan and
L. Bendová, D. Haigh and P. Kočovský, Angew. Chem., Int. X. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 7304–7307.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.
Ed., 2006, 45, 1432–1435. 71 Y. Jiang, X. Chen, X. Hu, C. Shu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zheng,
62 D. Pei, Z. Wang, S. Wei, Y. Zhang and J. Sun, Org. Lett., C. Lian, W. Yuan and X. Zhang, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2013, 355,
2006, 8, 5913–5915. 1931–1936.
63 D. Pei, Y. Zhang, S. Wei, M. Wang and J. Sun, Adv. Synth. 72 Y.-C. Xiao, C. Wang, Y. Yao, J. Sun and Y.-C. Chen, Angew.
Catal., 2008, 350, 619–623. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 10661–10664.
64 Z.-Y. Xue, Y. Jiang, W.-C. Yuan and X.-M. Zhang, Eur. J. Org. 73 X. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Yan, Y. Wang and J. Sun, J. Org. Chem.,
Chem., 2010, 616–619. 2013, 78, 6276–6280.
Open Access Article. Published on 04 April 2014. Downloaded on 4/18/2024 5:10:48 PM.
65 X. Wu, Y. Li, C. Wang, L. Zhou, X. Lu and J. Sun, Chem. – 74 X. Chen, Y. Zheng, C. Shu, W. Yuan, B. Liu and X. Zhang,
Eur. J., 2011, 17, 2846–2848. J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76, 9109–9115.
66 S. Guizzetti, M. Benaglia, M. Bonsignore and L. Raimondi, 75 For a recent review on the use of chiral phosphine oxides as
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 739–743. organocatalysts, see M. Benaglia and S. Rossi, Org. Biomol.
67 M. Bonsignore, M. Benaglia, R. Annunziata and Chem., 2010, 8, 3824–3830.
G. Celentano, Synlett, 2011, 8, 1085–1088. 76 M. Sugiura, N. Sato, S. Kotani and M. Nakajima, Chem.
68 H.-J. Zheng, W.-B. Chen, Z.-J. Wu, J.-D. Deng, W.-Q. Lin, Commun., 2008, 4309–4311.
W.-C. Yuan and X.-M. Zhang, Chem. – Eur. J., 2008, 14, 77 A. Genoni, M. Benaglia, E. Massolo and S. Rossi, Chem.
9864–9867. Commun., 2013, 49, 8365–8367.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2708–2723 | 2723