本⽂件为浓缩模板，请仔细理解本⽂件的⽤途

看着字数不少，但实际上就是⼀篇模板

本⽂件将discuss类的模板通过调整之后形成了agree和优缺点，⼀个类型的模板在三个类型
题⽬下的具体运⽤。三个类型加⼀起覆盖了⼋九成的题⽬，等于说背诵⼀篇搞定⼏乎全部

但有⼏个问题需要注意：

1.浓缩不包括任务类，也就是类似于原因解决⽅式的类型，这个要在讲义⾥看
2.浓缩类型的改写在减少背诵量的同时增加了观点数量，难度有所提⾼
3.⽤模板⼀定要看看我们安排的讲解视频，可以更⾼效率的掌握

Discuss

The discussion surrounding xxx (主题或议题, 短语) has provoked intense debate between
supporters and detractors. While some argue that xxx (⼀⽅⽴场, 句⼦), others maintain the
opposite, claiming that xxx (另⼀⽅⽴场, 句⼦). Having weighed both perspec ves, I am inclined
to side with the former/la er posi on (你的⽴场).

The ra onale bolstering this stance is rooted in compelling empirical evidence, clearly showing
that xxx (⽀持该⽴场的原因, 句⼦). This view is addi onally a rmed by the widespread
agreement that xxx (前⼀个空的解释, 句⼦). For instance, studies concluding that xxx (相关研究
举例, 句⼦) have repeatedly lent credibility to this argument. Moreover, the fact that xxx (⽀持该
⽴场的额外理由, 句⼦) further jus es endorsing this perspec ve, as it exempli es xxx (前⼀个
空的解释, 短语).

Conversely, skep cs suggest that xxx (反⽅⽴场合理性, 句⼦), predicated on the assump on
that xxx (反⽅⽴场合理性的解释, 句⼦). However, a closer look reveals that this line of
reasoning may be more fragile than it rst appears, par cularly considering that xxx (反⽅论点的
不⾜之处, 句⼦). This is largely because xxx (前⼀个空的解释, 句⼦), illustrated by data showing
that xxx (举例论证, 句⼦).

In conclusion, a er thoroughly evalua ng both arguments, my convic on that xxx (你的⽴场, 句

⼦) stands rm in light of the evidence presented.

Agree

The discussion surrounding xxx (主题或议题, 短语) has provoked intense debate between
supporters and detractors. Having weighed both sides, I am inclined to side with suppor ng/
opposing the view that xxx(题⽬观点).

The ra onale bolstering this stance is rooted in compelling empirical evidence, clearly showing
ti
ti
fi
ft
ti
tt
ti
ti
fi
ti
fi
ti
ti
ti
ffi
ti
ti
fi
ti
ti
 that xxx (⽀持该⽴场的原因, 句⼦). This view is addi onally a rmed by the widespread
agreement that xxx (前⼀个空的解释, 句⼦). For instance, studies concluding that xxx (相关研究
举例, 句⼦) have repeatedly lent credibility to this argument. Moreover, the fact that xxx (⽀持该
⽴场的额外理由, 句⼦) further jus es endorsing this perspec ve, as it exempli es xxx (前⼀个
空的解释, 短语).

Conversely, skep cs suggest that xxx (反⽅⽴场合理性, 句⼦), predicated on the assump on
that xxx (反⽅⽴场合理性的解释, 句⼦). However, a closer look reveals that this line of
reasoning may be more fragile than it rst appears, par cularly considering that xxx (反⽅论点的
不⾜之处, 句⼦). This is largely because xxx (前⼀个空的解释, 句⼦), illustrated by data showing
that xxx (举例论证, 句⼦).

In conclusion, a er thoroughly evalua ng both arguments, my convic on that xxx (你的⽴场, 句

⼦) stands rm in light of the evidence presented.

Advantages/Posi ve

The discussion surrounding xxx (主题或议题, 短语) has provoked intense debate between
supporters and detractors. It is palpable and noteworthy that xxx. Having weighed both sides, I
am inclined to treat it posi ve/nega ve.

The ra onale bolstering my stance is rooted in compelling empirical evidence, clearly showing
that xxx (⽀持该⽴场的原因, 句⼦). This view is addi onally a rmed by the widespread
agreement that xxx (前⼀个空的解释, 句⼦). For instance, studies concluding that xxx (相关研究
举例, 句⼦) have repeatedly lent credibility to this argument. Moreover, the fact that xxx (⽀持该
⽴场的额外理由, 句⼦) further jus es endorsing my perspec ve, as it exempli es xxx (前⼀个
空的解释, 短语).

Conversely, those who put more weights on its downsides/upsides(与⽴场相反) suggest that xxx
(反⽅⽴场合理性, 句⼦), predicated on the assump on that xxx (反⽅⽴场合理性的解释, 句
⼦). However, a closer look reveals that this line of reasoning may be more fragile than it rst
appears, par cularly considering that xxx (反⽅论点的不⾜之处, 句⼦). This is largely because
xxx (前⼀个空的解释, 句⼦), illustrated by data showing that xxx (举例论证, 句⼦).

In conclusion, a er thoroughly evalua ng both arguments, my convic on that xxx (你的⽴场, 句

⼦) stands rm in light of the evidence presented.

Discuss范⽂
ti
fi
fi
ti
ft
ft
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
fi
fi
ti
ti
fi
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ffi
ffi
ti
ti
fi
fi
ti
fi
 Some people believe that schools should focus on teaching prac cal skills to children, while
others argue that academic subjects are more important. Discuss both views and give your
opinion.

The discussion surrounding the balance between prac cal skills and academic subjects in school
curricula has provoked intense debate between supporters and detractors. While some argue
that emphasizing hands-on abili es be er prepares students for real-life challenges, others
maintain the opposite, claiming a solid grounding in theore cal knowledge is crucial for
intellectual development. Having weighed both perspec ves, I am inclined to side with the
la er posi on.

The ra onale bolstering this stance is rooted in compelling empirical evidence, clearly showing
that strong academic founda ons equip students with cri cal thinking and problem-solving
skills. This view is addi onally a rmed by the widespread agreement that pro ciency in subjects
like mathema cs and science fosters analy cal abili es essen al for higher educa on and
compe ve job markets. For instance, studies concluding that students with solid theore cal
knowledge o en adapt more quickly to complex professional roles have repeatedly lent
credibility to this argument. Moreover, the fact that in-depth academic study cul vates
innova on and crea vity further jus es endorsing this perspec ve, as it exempli es the
intellectual growth gained through rigorous schooling.

Conversely, skep cs suggest that focusing on prac cal skills meets immediate workforce
demands, predicated on the assump on that hands-on experience increases employability in
voca onal se ngs. However, a closer look reveals that this line of reasoning may be more fragile
than it rst appears, par cularly considering that jobs requiring only basic manual skills are
increasingly automated. This is largely because technological advancements diminish the need
for certain prac cal tasks, illustrated by data showing that industries relying on unskilled labor
face rapid automa on.

In conclusion, a er thoroughly evalua ng both arguments, my convic on that a strong academic

curriculum is ul mately more bene cial stands rm in light of the evidence presented.

Discuss范⽂
Some people believe that schools should focus on teaching academic subjects. Do you agree or
disagree?.

The discussion surrounding the balance between prac cal skills and academic subjects in school
curricula has provoked intense debate between supporters and detractors. Having weighed
both sides, I am inclined to side with suppor ng/opposing the view that schools should
focus on teaching academic subjects.

The ra onale bolstering this stance is rooted in compelling empirical evidence, clearly showing
that strong academic founda ons equip students with cri cal thinking and problem-solving
skills. This view is addi onally a rmed by the widespread agreement that pro ciency in subjects
like mathema cs and science fosters analy cal abili es essen al for higher educa on and
compe ve job markets. For instance, studies concluding that students with solid theore cal
knowledge o en adapt more quickly to complex professional roles have repeatedly lent
credibility to this argument. Moreover, the fact that in-depth academic study cul vates
innova on and crea vity further jus es endorsing this perspec ve, as it exempli es the
intellectual growth gained through rigorous schooling.

Conversely, skep cs suggest that focusing on prac cal skills meets immediate workforce
tt
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
fi
ti
ti
ti
ft
ft
tti
ti
ti
ft
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ffi
ffi
ti
fi
ti
ti
ti
ti
fi
fi
tt
ti
ti
fi
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
fi
fi
ti
ti
fi
fi
ti
ti
ti
ti
 demands, predicated on the assump on that hands-on experience increases employability in
voca onal se ngs. However, a closer look reveals that this line of reasoning may be more fragile
than it rst appears, par cularly considering that jobs requiring only basic manual skills are
increasingly automated. This is largely because technological advancements diminish the need
for certain prac cal tasks, illustrated by data showing that industries relying on unskilled labor
face rapid automa on.

In conclusion, a er thoroughly evalua ng both arguments, my convic on that a strong academic

curriculum is ul mately more bene cial stands rm in light of the evidence presented.

Advantage范⽂
Many schools are focusing on teaching academic subjects instead of prac cal skills. Does its
advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

The discussion surrounding the balance between prac cal skills and academic subjects in school
curricula has provoked intense debate between supporters and detractors. It is palpable and
noteworthy that many schools are focusing on teaching academic subjects instead of prac cal
skills. Having weighed both sides, I am inclined to treat it posi ve.

The ra onale bolstering my stance is rooted in compelling empirical evidence, clearly showing
that strong academic founda ons equip students with cri cal thinking and problem-solving
skills. This view is addi onally a rmed by the widespread agreement that pro ciency in subjects
like mathema cs and science fosters analy cal abili es essen al for higher educa on and
compe ve job markets. For instance, studies concluding that students with solid theore cal
knowledge o en adapt more quickly to complex professional roles have repeatedly lent
credibility to this argument. Moreover, the fact that in-depth academic study cul vates
innova on and crea vity further jus es endorsing my perspec ve, as it exempli es the
intellectual growth gained through rigorous schooling.

Conversely, those who put more weights on its downsides suggest that focusing on prac cal
skills meets immediate workforce demands, predicated on the assump on that hands-on
experience increases employability in voca onal se ngs. However, a closer look reveals that
this line of reasoning may be more fragile than it rst appears, par cularly considering that jobs
requiring only basic manual skills are increasingly automated. This is largely
because technological advancements diminish the need for certain prac cal tasks, illustrated by
data showing that industries relying on unskilled labor face rapid automa on.

In conclusion, a er thoroughly evalua ng both arguments, my convic on that a strong academic

curriculum is ul mately more bene cial stands rm in light of the evidence presented.
ti
ti
ti
ti
fi
ti
ft
tti
ti
ft
ft
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ffi
fi
fi
ti
ti
ti
ti
fi
ti
ti
fi
fi
fi
tti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
fi
ti
fi
ti
ti
ti
ti