TEXT SUMMARISATION

AND DOCUMENT UNDERSTANDING

Department of Computer Science & Engineering and Information

Technology

1
 ABSTRACT

Text summarization is basically summarizing of the given paragraph using natural

language processing and machine learning. There has been an explosion in the amount of
text data from a variety of sources. This volume of text is an invaluable source of
information and knowledge which needs to be effectively summarized to be useful. In
this review, the main approaches to automatic text summarization are described. We
review the different processes for summarization and describe the effectiveness and
shortcomings of the different methods. Two types will be used i.e.-extractive approach
and abstractive approach. The basic idea behind summarization is finding the subset of
the data which contains the information of all the set. There is a great need to reduce
unnecessary data. It is very difficult to summarize the document manually so there is the
great need of automatic methods. Approaches have been proposed inspired by the
application of deep learning methods for automatic machine translation, specifically by
framing the problem of text summarization as a sequence-to-sequence learning problem.

2
 TABLE OF CONTENT
Chapters Page
no.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction 1-2

1.2 Problem statement 2

1.3 Objectives 3

1.4 Methodology 3-5

1.6 Organization 5-6

2. LITERATURE SURVEY 7-23

3. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
3.1 NLP 24

3.2 Lesk Algorithm 25

3.3 About WordNet 26

3.4 Proposed System for Extractive approach 27-28

3.5 System Architecture for Extractive approach 28

3.6 Proposed System for Abstractive approach 29

3.7 Platform used 30

3.7.1 Windows 10 30-31

3.8 Python 33-34

4. Performance analysis
4.1 Approaches to Sentence Extraction
4.1.1 Frequency based approach 35-36
4.1.2 Feature-based approach 37-39

4.2 Approach using Deep learning

4.2.1 Recurrent Neural Network 41
4.2.2 LSTM 42
4.2.3 Encoders and Decoder 43-44
4.2.4 Attentive Recurrent Architecture 44

3
 4.3 Training Dataset 45

4.4 Training Snippet 46-49

4.5 Custom Input and Output 50

4.6 Loss Graph 50

4.7 Rogue Score 51

5. CONCLUSION
5.1 Conclusion 52

5.2 Future Scope 53

6. Reference 54-55

4
 Chapter-1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

With the developing measure of data, it has turned out to be hard to discover brief data.
In this way, it is critical to making a framework that could condense like a human.
Programmed content rundown with the assistance of Normal Dialect Handling is an
instrument that gives synopses of a given archive. Content Outline strategies is divided in
two ways i.e. - extractive and abstractive approach. The extractive approach basically
choose the various and unique sentences, sections and so forth make a shorter type of the
first report. The sentences are estimated and chosen based on accurate highlights of the
sentences. In the Extractive technique, we have to choose the subset from the given
expression or sentences in given frame of the synopsis. The extractive outline
frameworks depends on two methods i.e. - extraction and expectation which includes the
arrangement of the particular sentences that are essential in the general comprehension
the archive. What’s more, the other methodology i.e. abstractive content synopsis
includes producing completely new articulations to catch the importance of the first
record. This methodology is all the more difficult but on the other hand is the
methodology utilized by people.

New methodologies like Machine taking in procedures from firmly related fields, for
example, content mining and data recovery have been utilized to help programmed
content synopsis.

From Completely Mechanized Summarizers (FAS), there are techniques that assistance
clients doing rundown (MAHS = Machine Helped Human Synopsis), for instance by
featuring hopeful sections to be included the outline, and there are frameworks that rely
upon post-preparing by a human (HAMS = Human Supported Machine Rundown).

There are two types of extractive rundown errands which rely on the outline application
focuses. One is nonexclusive synopsis, which centres on getting a general rundown or
unique of the Archive (regardless of whether records, news stories and so on.). Another is
inquiry related synopsis, some of the time called question based outline, which abstracts
especially to the question. Outline strategies can make both inquiry related content
rundowns and conventional machine-created synopses relying upon what the client
needs.

Likewise, rundown strategies endeavour to discover subsets of items, which contain data
of the total set. This is otherwise called the centre set. These calculations demonstrate
experiences like inclusion, decent variety, data or representativeness of the outline.
Question based synopsis techniques, furthermore demonstrate for purpose of the outline
with the inquiry. A few techniques and calculations which specifically outline issues are
Text Rank and Page Rank, Sub modular set capacity, determinately point process,
maximal negligible significance (MMR) and so forth.

1.2 Problem Statement

In the new period, where tremendous measure of data is accessible on the Web, it is most
vital to give the enhanced gadget to get data rapidly. It is extremely intense for
individuals to physically pick the synopsis of expansive archives of content. So there is
an issue of scanning for vital reports from the accessible archives and discovering
essential data. Along these lines programmed content rundown is the need of great
importance. Content rundown is the way toward recognizing the most vital important
data in a record or set of related archives. What’s more, compact them into a shorter
rendition looking after its implications. .
1.3 Objectives

The objective of the project is to understand the concepts of natural language processing
and creating a tool for text summarization. The concern in automatic summarization is
increasing broadly so the manual work is removed. The project concentrates creating a
tool which automatically summarizes the document.

1.4 Methodologies

For obtaining automatic text summarization, there are basically two major techniques
i.e.-Abstraction based Text Summarization and Extraction based Text Summarization.

Extraction Based Extraction

The Extractive summaries are used to highlight the words which are relevant, from input
source document. Summaries help in generating concatenated sentences taken as per the
appearance. Decision is made based on every sentence if that particular sentence will be
included in the summary or not. For example, Search engines typically use Extractive
summary generation methods to generate summaries from web page. Many types of
logical and mathematical formulations have been used to create summary. The regions
are scored and the words containing highest score are taken into the consideration. In
extraction only important sentences are selected. This approach is easier to implement.
There are three main obstacles for extractive approach. The first thing is ranking problem
which includes ranking of the word. The second one selection problem that includes the
selection of subset of particular units of ranks and the third one is coherence that is to
know to select various units from understandable summary. There are many algorithms
which are used to solve ranking problem. The two obstacles i.e. - selection and coherence
are further solved to improve diversity and helps in minimizing the redundancy and
pickup the lines which are important. Each sentence is scored and arranged in decreasing
order according to the score. It is not trivial problem which helps in selecting the subsets
of sentences for coherent summary. It helps in reduction of redundancy. When the list is
put in ordered manner than the first sentence is the most important sentence which helps
in forming the summary. The sentence having the highest similarity is selected in next
step is picked from the top half of the list. The process has to be repeated until the limit is
reached and relevant summary is generated.
Abstraction Based summarization

People by and large utilize abstractive outlines. In the wake of perusing content,
Individuals comprehend the point and compose a short outline in their own particular
manner creating their very own sentences without losing any essential data. In any case,
it is troublesome for machine to make abstractive synopses. Along these lines, it very
well may be said that the objective of reflection based outline is to make a synopsis
utilizing regular dialect preparing procedure which is utilized to make new sentences that
are syntactically right. Abstractive rundown age is difficult than extractive technique as
it needs a semantic comprehension of the content to be encouraged into the Common
Dialect framework. Sentence Combination being the significant issue here offers ascend
to irregularity in the produced outline, as it's anything but an all around created field yet.

Abstractive arrangement to grouping models is by and large prepared on titles and

captions. The comparative methodology is embraced with archive setting which helps in
scaling. Further every one of the sentences is revamped in the request amid the inference.
Document synopsis can be changed over to regulated or semi-administered learning
issue. In directed learning methodologies, indications or signs, for example, key-phrases,
point words, boycott words, are utilized to recognize the sentences as positive or negative
classes or the sentences are physically labelled. At that point the parallel more tasteful
can be prepared for getting the scores or synopsis of each sentence. Anyway they are not
effective in removing archive explicit summaries. If the report level data isn't given then
these methodologies give same expectation independent of the record. Giving archive
setting in the models diminishes this issue.

1.5 Organization

Chapter 1: Includes a brief introduction to the project. A basic idea

of what we are doing and what we are trying to accomplish with this
Project has also been provided and technologies we are using in this
project have also been listed. .
Chapter 2: Includes literature survey. We have studied various papers
and journal from reputed sources on machine learning and artificial
neural network and have mentioned those in this chapter. .

Chapter 3: Includes details on system development. Explanation about

the project design, models implemented and formulas applied have been
mentioned.

Chapter 4: Includes result and result analysis. This section provides

the results are implemented models are yielding and accuracy of those
results have been scrutinized in this section. .

Chapter 5: Conclusion. Outcomes and the future scope of the project

have been discussed briefly. .
 Chapter-2

LITERATURE

SURVEY

2.1 Summary of Papers

2.2.1

Title Automatic Text Summarization Approaches[1]

Authors AhmadT. Al-Taani (Ph.D., MSc, BSc) Professor
of Computer Science (Artificial Intelligence) Faculty of
Information Technology and Computer Sciences
Yarmouk University, Jordan.
Year of August 2017
Publications
Publishing International Conference on Infocom Technologies and Unmanned
Details Systems (ICTUS'2017)
Summary Text summarization systems are important in many aspects in a
language like natural language processing. ATS creates the summary
of given document which save time and resources. There are single
and multi-document text summary. Only one document is extracted
in case of single document summarization whereas group of
documents is selected in multi document summarization.
On other hand, mathematics techniques makes the extractive
summarization language independent to theoretical ways. In this
analysis, we tend to the thought of the utilization of extractive
summarization methodology. There are two content-based summaries
i.e. - generic and query-based summaries. In the generic
summarization system if the user doesn’t have knowledge about text
then information measure equal level in information. Whereas in
query-based summarization, before starting of the summarization
technique, the topic is verified of the initial text. The system extracts
 that knowledge from the provision text and presents it defines. There
are three main approaches to summarization i.e.-
statistical, the graph-based, and machine learning approaches.
The other approach is a clustering approach.
In statistical approaches, researchers are based upon sentence
ranking and the important sentences are selected from the given
document, regarded as the important summary compression ratio.
Graph-based approaches concentrate on the semantic analysis and
relationship among sentences. The graph-based approach is used in
the representation for text inside documents.
Machine learning approaches helps in producing summary by
applying machine learning algorithms. This approach deals with the
summarization process as a classification problem. Based on the
characteristics sentences are divided for summary.

2.2.2

Title Automatic Text Summarization: Single and Multiple

Summarizations[2]
Authors Neelima Bhatia
Amity School of Engineering and Technology
(ASET)
Amity University Noida, India
Arunima Jaiswal
Amity School of Engineering and Technology
(ASET)
Amity University Noida, India
Year of May 2015
Publications
Publishing International Journal of Computer Applications
Details
Summary There is large amount of information available in internet.. The actual
results very long and hard to read . thus the demand of automatic
summarization increased. Automatic summarization collect the
important information from the given document and generate the
summary which is important and save time. The review is based on
single and multiple summarization methods. Automatic
summarization takes out the data from the document and save the
time. H.P. Luhn discovered automatic summarization of given text in
the year 1958. `NLP invented the subfield of summarization. In
automatic summarization important points are not lost. There are two
approaches-Abstraction and extraction approach.
Extraction is domain independent and provides summary.
Abstraction is domain dependent and understands the whole
document and produce the summary.
Two types of summarization-
Single document text summarization
Multi-document text summarization
The idea of single document summarization dropped and
the focus was on multi-document which helps in size reduction
, maintaining syntax and semantic relationship Abstractive seq to seq
models is generally trained on titles and subtitles. The similar
approach is adopted with document context which helps in scaling.
Further all the sentences are rearranged in the order during the
inference. Document summarization is changed to supervised or
semi-supervised problems. Hints are given like topic words; blacklist
words etc. in case of supervised learning approach which are used to
identify the sentences as positive or negative classes or the sentences
are manually tagged. Then the binary classifier helps in obtaining the
scores of each sentence. However they are not successful in providing
document specific summaries. The document helps in predicting if
the document level information is not provided.
Abstraction is domain dependent and understands the whole
document and produce the summary.
Two types of summarization-
 Single document text summarization
Multi-document text summarization
The idea of single document summarization dropped and
the focus was on multi-document which helps in size reduction
,maintaining syntax and semantic relationship

2.2.3

Title Text Summarization Techniques: A Brief Survey[3]

Authors Mehdi Allahyari, Seyedamin Pouriyeh, Mehdi Assefi, Saeid
Safaei, Elizabeth D. Trippe,
Juan B. Gutierrez, Krys Kochut

Year of November 2017

Publications
Publishing (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and
Details Applications
Summary This paper surveys the distinctive procedures for synopsis and
portrays the adequacy and inadequacies of the diverse strategies.
Content outline helps in shortening a content report into a packed
form keeping all the imperative data. Programmed content synopsis
is the undertaking of delivering a short rundown while protecting key
data
Substance and by and large meaning. There are numerous precedents
like web crawlers create pieces as the sneak peeks of the archives,
Different models helps in incorporating the new sites which helps in
delivering packed portrayals of news points more often than not as
features to encourage perusing. Programmed content synopsis is
troublesome and non paltry errand. Luhn et al presented a technique
to choose acclaimed sentences from the content utilizing highlights,
 for example, word and expression recurrence. The heaviness of the
sentence was proposed. High recurrence words were given high
inclination.
The two methodologies for programmed rundown is extraction and
reflection. Extractive outline strategies distinguish imperative
segments of the content and creating them precisely. Abstractive
synopsis techniques deliver
Imperative component recently. Characteristic dialect handling is
utilized to translate and inspect the content with the end goal to
create another shorter content. Extractive rundown gives preferred
outcomes over abstractive outline.

2.2.4

Title Sentiment Analysis and Text Summarization of Online Reviews:

A Survey
Authors Pankaj Gupta, Ritu Tiwari and Nirmal Robert

Year of April 2016

Publications
Publishing International Conzatiference on Communication and Signal
Details Processing
Summary Content rundown has incited the enthusiasm of numerous specialists
in past few years, since the literary information is valuable for some
genuine applications and issues. These surveys are expanding step by
step and have turned out to be vital to condense the record. It is
extremely troublesome for person to abridge the archive. In Content
synopsis, significance of sentences is chosen dependent on correct
component of sentences. This paper provides a far reaching diagram
 of content outline and gives phenomenal queries about research and
methodologies for future appearances.
Content synopsis acquires valuable data from this expansive
information which can be utilized to make the summary. The
fundamental point is to look at how changed techniques have been
utilized to assemble rundown frameworks and perform surveys.

2.2.5

Title A Survey of Text Summarization Extractive Techniques

Authors Vishal Gupta University Institute of Engineering & Technology,
Computer Science & Engineering, Panjab University
Chandigarh, India
Gurpreet Singh Lehal Department of Computer Science,
Punjabi University Patiala, Punjab, India

Year of August 2010

Publications
Publishing JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN WEB
Details INTELLIGENCE, VOL. 2, NO. 3,
Summary Text Summarization flattens the document into summary which
maintain its important information. It becomes very difficult for
human beings to summarize the paragraph. There are basically two
approaches i.e.-extractive and abstractive summarization.
Extractive approach-The sentences which are important are
selected from the provided document and converts into summary.
Based on its statistical and semantic features the importance is
decided of the particular sentence.
Abstractive Approach - It consists of understanding the original
text and converting in summary. It checks the test and interprets it. It
describes by generating in shorter form which includes most
important information from the given document.
Therefore, a twofold problem is faced for important documents
through number of documents available, and it absorbs the large
quantity of important information. Automatic text
summarization is use to short the source text into a shorter version
protecting its information content and overall meaning. The
advantage of the summary is that the reading time is reduced. The
repetition is kept to be minimum. Summarization tools also search
for headings to identify the key points of a document. Microsoft
Word’s AutoSummarize function is example of text summarization.
Extractive text summarization process is divided into two steps
1) Pre Processing step
2)Processing step.
Pre Processing is a structured description of the original text. It
usually involves:
a) Sentences boundary identification- it is identified with the
appearance of dot at the end of decision.
b) Stop-Word Elimination-Common words with no semantics.
c) Stemming—The stemming is used to get the stem of every word,
that highlight its semantics.
In Processing step, the importance of given sentence is decided and
the weight is assigned using weight learning method. The score is
calculated using Feature-weight equation. The sentences containing
highest ranking are converted for summary.
2.2.6

Title Abstractive document summarization with a Graph-Based

attentional neural model
Authors Jiwei Tan, Xiaojun Wan,Jianguo Xiao
Institute of Computer Science and Technology,Peking University

Year of August 2017

Publications
Summary Document summarization helps in generating a fluent and short
summary of provided document and helps in keeping important
information as it is very difficult to read whole paragraph. People are
facing lot of problem in today’s era, document summarization has
been investigated. Two approaches are used for text summarization
i.e. - Extractive and Abstractive approach. In case of extractive
approach summary is generated by extracting sentences or paragraph
from provided document. It helps in preserving the meaning of
original text along with the important sentences but it has a drawback
of information redundancy and incoherence between sentences.
Hence the other approach is used for the text summarization i.e.-
abstractive method. It generates better summary with the help of
arbitrary words and understanding the expression. Although it is very
difficult approach as it involves various techniques including
meaning representation, content organization, and surface realization.
As the starting the abstractive approach cannot always guarantee
grammatical abstracts. RNN enable an end-to-end framework for
natural language generation. Although the approach is very
successful in machine translation and captioning of images.
Unfortunately, document summarization in case of abstractive
approach is not straight forward. Encoding and decoding of multiple
sentences, still does not provide relevant and satisfactory solutions.
In this paper, the review of document is done through key factors of
document summarization i.e.- the salience, fluency, coherence, and
novelty requirements of the generated summary.
 .Distraction mechanism is used to avoid the redundancy.
In this paper there is study of how neural summarization model
generate or get to know salient information of a particular document.
By studying and seeing graph-based extractive approach the novel
based approach is discovered in the encoder-decoder framework.
Seqtoseq model is also generated and discovered a new hierarchical
decoding algorithm is determined with a reference mechanism which
generate the abstractive summaries. The method helps to check
constraints of saliency The proposed method, non-redundancy,
information correctness, and fluency under various framework.
Experiments have been conducted on two large-scale corpora with
human generated summaries. Results are produced successfully that
outperforms previous neural abstractive Summarisation models, and
is also competitive with state-of-the-art extractive methods. Various
methods, experiments have been provided in given paper.

2.2.7

Title Framework of automatic text summarization using

Reinforcement learning
Authors Seonggi Ryang, Graduate school of Information science and
technology, University of Tokyo
Takeshi Abekawa, National institute of informatics

Year of August 2012

Publications
Summary Well organized summary is generated of single and multiple
documents. Multi-document summarization has become very
important part of our daily lives as there is lot of information about
one particular topic so it becomes very difficult to read. Summary of
document helps to easily understand about the topic and important
information is generated. The extractive approach is used which is
popular for document summary. Summary is generated by selecting
words and sentences from the provided document because it is
difficult to guarantee the linguistic quality. Marginal relevance
(MMR) is used which is used to score every textual unit and take out
the highest score. Greedy MMR algorithm is also used but due to its
greediness they don’t take into account the whole quality. Global
inference algorithm is also used for summary. However, these
algorithms create lot of problem in formulation of integer linear
programming for scoring and the time complexity is very hard. So
there is great need of efficient algorithms. In this paper the new
approach in generated called Automatic Summarization using
Reinforcement Learning (ASRL), where the summary is generated
within framework and scores the function of summary. The method
is used and adapts to problem with automatic summarization in
natural way. Sentence compression is also adapted as action of
framework. ASRL is evaluated which is comparable with the state of
ILP-style taking rouge score into consideration. Evaluation is done
on basis of execution time. State space is searched efficiently for sub
optimal solution underscore functions and the score function, and
produce a summary whose score denotes the expectation of the score
of the same features’ states. The quality of summary only depends on
score function.
2.2.8

Title Neural Abstractive text summarization with sequence-to -

sequence models
Authors Tian shi, Yaser Keneshloo, Naren ramakrishnan, Chandan K.
Reddy, Senior member, IEEE

Year of August 2018

Publications
Summary It is very difficult and challenging to generate the summary of large
number of textual data. Automatic text summarization helps in
generating the summary. The basic task is to convert long paragraph
into short summary. It conserver all the important information and
meanings. In General two approaches are used. Extractive approach
helps in producing correct summary. Abstractive summarization
produces novel words using language generation models. It produces
great quality of summary and includes external knowledge. Many
evaluation measures have been used for better performance.
In this paper concentration is on sequence-to-sequence models.
SeqtoSeq have been used in natural language processing tasks for
example machine translation, Generation of headlines and summary
of given text. They first worked on a neural attention seq2seq model
by concentrating on encoder and neural network language model
(NNLM) decoder to the abstractive sentence. Various elements were
used to RNN encoder-decoder architecture for difficult problems in
case of abstractive approach that further includes encoder to capture
keywords, switching generator-pointer to model out-of-vocabulary
(OOV) word and the hierarchical attention to capture hierarchical
document structures.
There were various drawbacks as well for multi sentence documents
like the salient information was not generated correctly and could not
handle OOV words. It was very difficult to determine word and
sentence repetitions. The pointer generator is used which helps in
copying the words from text via pointer with the help of pointing
 important information is generated accurately and OOV words are
also taken into consideration while summarizing a paragraph.
Coverage mechanism, intra-decoder attention mechanisms and many
more approaches have been used.

2.2.9

Title Neural Summarization by extracting sentences and words

Authors Jianpeng Cheng,ILCC,school of informatics,University of
Edinburgh
Mirella Lapata,10 crichton street, Edinburgh

Year of July 2016

Publications
Summary It is very difficult to digest huge amount of data which has provided
stimulus to generate automatic summarization where the main focus
is on generating summary from given document. Focus is on
sentence extraction. It helps to create the summary by identifying
salient text units. The extractive approach involves the different
words in title, nouns, word frequency, action nouns etc. There are
various methods selected to generate summary like graph based
algorithms, sentences ranging from binary classifiers, integer linear
programming. The data driven approach has been used in this paper
with the help of neural networks and sentence features. Machine
translation has become very important part. Encoder Decoder is used
by recurrent neural network. The encoder helps in reading the source
sequence into the list whereas decoder helps in generating the target
sequence. Framework is developed for single documents
summarization which helps in extracting the sentences. The model
includes neural network-based hierarchical document reader or
encoder and an attention-based content extractor. Reader helps in
telling the meaning of paragraph based on sentences. Model include
different neural network to extract sentences. The model directly
focuses on selecting sentences to generate output summary. Neural
arch. Have also been used for geometry reasoning. With the help of
number of transformation and scoring algorithms, highlights to
document content are matched and two large training data sets are
constructed. One is generated for sentence extraction and the other
one is generated through word extraction. They viewed
summarization as a problem analogous to statistical machine
translation and generate headlines using statistical models for
selecting and ordering the summary words. Model keeps on
operating representations and helps in producing multi-sentence
output and organizes summary words into sentences so that it is easy
for reader to read. Meaning of sentences is also determined and
employs neural network directly to generate actual summarization.
Neural attention model is generated for abstractive sentence
compression which is trained in on different pairs of headlines and
different sentences in article. Rather than selecting whole vocabulary
the decoder selects output symbols.
Model helps in accommodating both generation and extraction. The
evaluation is done by both the ways i.e. - automatically and by
humans on both the datasets.
2.2.10

Title A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence

summarization
Authors Alexander M. rush, Facebook AI research/ Harvard SEAS
Sumit Chopra, Facebook AI research
Jason Weston, Facebook AI research

Year of sep. 2015

Publications
Summary It has become very important to summarize the document as it
becomes very easy to get whole information in summary. The basic
aim is to grasp the main and important meaning of the original
document. Extractive summarization is very successful approach
which crop out and combine whole portion to produce better version.
Whereas, abstractive summarization produces bottom up summary.
The focus is on task of sentence level summarization. From the
previous work either linguistic-inspired constraints or with syntactic
transformation of input text. Full data driven approach is used for
generating abstractive summary. There is the combination of neural
language model with a contextual input encoder. Both the models are
trained on jointly on sentence summarization task. It also
incorporates beam search decoder. It incorporates less linguistics
structure than other approaches. Since the system does not make any
assumption about the vocabulary of the summary so it is trained
directly on any document summary pair.
 Chapter-3

System

Development

3.1 Natural Language Processing

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is the intersection of Computer Science, Linguistics
and Machine Learning that is involved with the interaction between computers and
humans in natural language.

NLP is way toward empowering PCs to comprehend and deliver human dialect. Uses of
NLP systems are utilized in separating of text, machine interpretation and Voice Agents
like Alexa and Siri. NLP is one of the fields that are profited from the advanced
methodologies in Machine Adapting, particularly from Profound Learning strategies.

Regular Dialect Preparing method utilize the characteristic dialect toolbox for making the
principle arrange in python tasks to work with human dialect data. This is simpler to-use
by giving the interfaces to at least one than 40 corpora and dictionary resources, for
portrayal, for part passages sentences and to get the words in its unique frame Marking,
parsing, and glossary thinking for current reasoning quality basic dialect dealing with
libraries, and for dynamic discourse. The NLTK will utilize a colossal instrument area
and will make some help for individuals with the whole basic dialect taking care of
system. This will assist individuals with part sentences from sections, to part up words,
seeing the syntactic segments of those words, denoting the fundamental subjects, doing
this it serves to your machine by acknowledging the main thing to the substance.
3.2 Lesk Algorithm
NLP is the way toward empowering PCs to comprehend and deliver human dialect. Uses
of NLP systems are utilized in separating of text, machine interpretation and Voice
Agents like Alexa and Siri. NLP is one of the fields that are profited from the advanced
methodologies in Machine Adapting, particularly from Profound Learning strategies.

Regular Dialect Preparing method utilize the characteristic dialect toolbox for making the
principle arrange in python tasks which work with human language data. This is simpler
to-use by providing the interfaces to at least one than 40 corpora and dictionary
resources, for portrayal, for part passages sentences and to get words in its unique frame.
marking, parsing, and glossary thinking for current reasoning quality basic dialect
dealing with libraries, and for dynamic discourse. The NLTK will utilize a colossal
instrument area and will make some help for individuals with the whole basic dialect
taking care of system. This will assist individuals with role sentences from sections,
seeing the syntactic segments of those words, denoting the fundamental subjects, doing
this it serves to the machine by acknowledging the main thing to the substance.

3.3 About WordNet

The wordnet is arranged semantically which creates the electronic database of verbs,
adjectives etc. Similar words are grouped together to form the synonym sets. The
algorithm is used which removes the words that belong to at least one synset and is
known as wordnet words. Synsets are interrelated by semantics and lexical relation.
Word net not only links the words but also the senses of the words. It group together all
the English words and provides the short definitions. It is accessible to human users via a
web browser and is used in automatic text review and artificial intelligence utilizations
 prepositions and other function words and includes nouns, verbs etc. All Synsets are
connected by semantic relation.

Step 3: Summarization this is the last stage for automatic summarization. The last outline of
the particular stage is evaluated the introductions of the yield and survey is done at the time
when all the sentences are arranged. Firstly, it will select the onceover of sentences with
weight and are planned in jumping demand which is concerned by the increasing weights.
Various numbers of sentences are picked from the rate of summary. Further the sentences
which are picked are recomposed by the gathering in information. Further, the sentences
which are selected are gathered without any dependence of any particular object rather than
the denotative erudition lying in the sentence. Restrained matter once- over is without spoken
language.

3.4 System Architecture for Extractive Approach

1. Extractive Text Summarization Approach:

The project focuses on extractive summarization, which involves selecting the most important sentences from the
original text rather than generating new sentences (as done in abstractive summarization).
The selected sentences form a concise summary while retaining the main ideas and concepts of the document.

2. BERT-Based Feature Extraction:

Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), a state-of-the-art deep learning model, is used
for sentence embedding.
BERT captures the contextual meaning of words in sentences by analyzing the text bidirectionally, i.e., both left-to-
right and right-to-left.
The BERT model encodes sentences into dense vectors (embeddings) that represent their semantic meanings,
enabling the system to identify the most important sentences within a document.
This approach significantly improves the system's ability to capture relationships between sentences, even in long
documents.

3. Cosine Similarity for Sentence Comparison:

The system calculates the cosine similarity between pairs of sentences to determine how similar they are.
The cosine similarity score is a measure of the angle between the sentence vectors obtained from BERT
embeddings. Sentences with higher similarity scores are likely to contain similar information.
This step helps in building a similarity matrix that serves as the foundation for ranking the importance of each
sentence.

4. Graph-Based Sentence Ranking Using PageRank Algorithm:

A graph-based model is used to represent the sentences as nodes and their relationships (similarity scores) as
edges between them.
The PageRank algorithm, originally developed for ranking web pages, is adapted to rank sentences. Sentences that
are highly interconnected with other important sentences in the document are given higher importance scores.
This algorithm ensures that the most relevant sentences are selected for the final summary based on their relative
importance in the context of the entire document.

5. Preprocessing of Text Data:

Before summarization, the system performs extensive preprocessing on the input text:
Tokenization: The document is split into sentences.
Stop-word Removal: Common but uninformative words (like "and," "the") are removed to focus on the core
content.
Lemmatization: Words are reduced to their base forms (e.g., "running" becomes "run"), which helps in
standardizing the data.
Punctuation Removal: Unnecessary punctuation is removed to clean the text.
These preprocessing steps ensure that the summarization model works on a clean and standardized dataset,
improving accuracy.

6. Summarization Workflow Visualization:

The project includes a flowchart-based visualization of the summarization workflow, helping users understand how
the text is processed, ranked, and summarized.
Key steps in the workflow, including preprocessing, feature extraction, sentence ranking, and final summary
generation, are illustrated in detail to explain the system's functionality.

7. Evaluation and Metrics (ROUGE Scorer):

The system's performance is evaluated using the ROUGE metric (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting
Evaluation), which is a standard evaluation measure for summarization tasks.
ROUGE compares the generated summary to reference summaries (created by humans) and measures the overlap
between them in terms of precision, recall, and F-score.
This metric ensures that the system produces summaries that are not only concise but also close to human-level
summarization quality.

8. Scalability and Flexibility:

The system is designed to handle large volumes of textual data efficiently, making it suitable for a wide range of
applications like news summarization, academic research, and social media content.
The architecture can be easily scaled to process multiple documents or even large datasets, such as news article
databases or research archives.

9. Multilingual Support (Potential for Future Expansion):

While the project focuses on summarization in English, the methodology (especially BERT, which has multilingual
variants) can be extended to support other languages, including those that require specialized handling, such as
Marathi and Punjabi.
This flexibility opens up possibilities for future enhancements to support multilingual summarization.

10. Accessibility and User-Focused Design:

The summarization system has potential applications in accessibility, particularly for users with visual impairments.
By combining the summarization system with text-to-speech technology, it can offer audio summaries for visually
impaired users, making textual content more accessible.
11. Application in Various Domains:

The summarization system is designed to be domain-independent, meaning it can be applied to various types of
text documents:
News articles for generating quick summaries of daily news.
Research papers for assisting scholars in quickly grasping the core ideas of lengthy academic publications.
Educational content for condensing large textbooks or course materials into digestible pieces of information.

12. Use of Python and Popular NLP Libraries:

The project uses Python, a highly popular language for machine learning and NLP, along with libraries like NLTK (for
text processing), Sklearn (for cosine similarity), TensorFlow Hub (for downloading BERT models), and
NumPy/Pandas (for dataset handling).
This setup makes the project modular, easily maintainable, and extensible, allowing for future improvements.

13. Dataset Integration:

For training and evaluation, the system integrates datasets like news summary datasets from Kaggle, which
provide a wide variety of real-world text documents to test the summarization model.
The model is designed to work with various types of datasets, making it adaptable to multiple sources of text data.

14. Robust Handling of Information Overload:

The summarization system is specifically designed to address the information overload problem that exists in fields
such as journalism, research, and social media.
By condensing large texts into essential summaries, it helps users quickly extract the most relevant information,
saving time and enhancing productivity.

Advantages
1. Time Efficiency:
The project enables users to quickly obtain key information from large texts without having to read
through entire documents. This is particularly beneficial in time-sensitive environments like newsrooms,
research, and businesses, where decisions often rely on fast access to information.
By condensing long documents into concise summaries, users can review multiple pieces of content in a
fraction of the time.
2. Improved Document Understanding:
The system enhances document comprehension by focusing on the most relevant sentences. This
ensures that even in cases where users skim through content, they get a clear understanding of the
document's main ideas.
The use of BERT embeddings ensures that the summaries maintain the context and meaning of the
original document, leading to more accurate document understanding.
3. Handling Information Overload:
With the increasing volume of data available online and in industries like journalism, academia, and
social media, this system provides a practical solution to information overload.
The summarization tool reduces large blocks of text into digestible summaries, allowing users to filter out
irrelevant or redundant information more effectively.
4. Enhanced Productivity:
The project improves productivity for professionals who need to review large amounts of text daily, such
as journalists, researchers, analysts, and students.
By offering summaries that retain essential information, users can focus on the key insights without
getting bogged down by excessive detail, improving decision-making processes.
5. Accessibility for Diverse Users:
The system can be integrated with text-to-speech (TTS) technologies, making it highly beneficial for
visually impaired individuals by converting summarized text into audio.
Summarization also benefits elderly users or those with cognitive impairments who might struggle with
reading long documents.
6. Cross-Domain Application:
The summarization system can be applied across different domains, such as:
News aggregation: Summarizing multiple news articles into key points.
Academic research: Summarizing long research papers and journal articles.
Legal documents: Condensing legal documents into key points for faster comprehension.
Educational content: Summarizing textbooks or course materials for students.
This flexibility makes the system useful for a wide variety of professional fields and industries.
7. Improved Decision-Making:
By providing concise summaries of important documents, the system helps users make informed
decisions quickly. This is especially useful in fields like business intelligence, where quick access to critical
data can impact strategic decisions.
8. Better Information Retention:
Summarizing large documents allows users to focus on and retain the most important information,
enhancing overall learning and comprehension. Summaries also act as reference points for future
retrieval, allowing users to revisit key ideas without re-reading entire documents.
9. Scalability for Large Datasets:
The system is designed to handle large volumes of data, making it suitable for large datasets such as
news databases, research archives, and corporate document repositories.
This makes the system scalable for enterprise use, where organizations deal with extensive content that
requires summarization.
10. Higher Summarization Accuracy:
The use of BERT embeddings and PageRank ensures that the system identifies the most important
sentences accurately, leading to high-quality summaries.
By incorporating deep contextual understanding through BERT and ranking sentences based on cosine
similarity and PageRank, the system produces more reliable and coherent summaries than traditional
methods.
11. Customization and Personalization:
The project can be adapted to specific user needs or industries, allowing for customized summarization
based on the type of content (e.g., news, scientific papers, or business reports).
By tailoring the system to specific domains, it becomes possible to enhance the relevance and usefulness
of the generated summaries for particular user groups.
12. Better Evaluation Metrics:
The system uses ROUGE scoring to evaluate the quality of the generated summaries, ensuring that the
summaries produced are close to human-generated summaries in terms of relevance and accuracy.
This helps maintain a consistent standard of summarization quality and allows for continuous
improvement of the system.
13. Resource Optimization:
The project saves resources (time and effort) that would otherwise be spent on manually reading and
summarizing large volumes of text.
Organizations, researchers, and media outlets can reduce the need for human resources dedicated to
manual summarization, optimizing operational efficiency.
14. Multilingual and Multidisciplinary Potential:
While the current system is focused on English, its methodology can be expanded to support multilingual
text summarization, making it valuable for non-English content in various global markets.
The approach can also be fine-tuned for domain-specific summaries, such as medical, legal, or technical
documents, enhancing its utility across multiple disciplines.
15. Adaptable for AI Applications:
The summarization techniques used in this project (such as BERT and PageRank) can be integrated into
broader AI systems for tasks like chatbot development, question answering systems, and document
classification.
This adaptability makes the system a core component for future AI-powered applications focused on text
analysis and understanding.
16. Cost-Effective:
Automating the summarization process can significantly reduce the costs associated with manual
content summarization, such as hiring human summarizers or outsourcing the task.
Over time, this cost-saving potential is especially beneficial for companies or institutions that manage a
high volume of textual data.

Proposed system for Abstractive Approach

The proposed approach uses machine and deep learning concepts. The flow chart for this
approach is as follows:
3.8 Platform Used

3.8.1 Windows 10

Windows 10 is defined as the Microsoft which works with the particular framework for
PCs, tablets, and inserted gadgets etc. Microsoft discharged Windows 10 is follow-up to
Windows 8. It was said on July that the window 10 will be refreshed instead of
discharging it and framework as a successor.

When the window 10 is selected or received can be updated by inheritance

straightforwardly from window 7, 8 or window 10. Without performing meddling and the
framework redesign methodology. For maintenance clients run the windows 10 which
helps in exchanging the application on the past operating system and setting to window
10. Clients pickup and fill or refresh window 10. With the help of window refresh partner
window 10 can be redesigned to physically start an overhaul for Windows.

Windows 10 is used to highlight work in capacities which through which IT offices

enables to utilize mobile phones the board (MDM) programming to anchor and control
gadgets helps in running working framework. For given boarding programming For
example, Microsoft Framework Centre Arrangement Chief. Microsoft Windows 10 is
used for multifaceted validation advances, for example, smart cards and tokens. Further,
Windows Hi has the biometric verification to Windows 10, where clients can sign in with
a unique finger impression, or facial acknowledgment.

The framework is used to incorporate virtualization-based security tools, for example,

Secluded Client Mode, Windows Safeguard Gadget Watch and Windows Protector
Qualification Monitor. The Windows 10 is used to keep the highlights of particular
information, procedures and client certifications separated trying to resolve the problem
from any strike. Windows 10 is newer version for Bit Locker encryption to confirm
information between clients' gadgets, stockpiling equipment, messages and cloud
administrations.
Windows 8 came up with the new idea and gave touch-empowered motion driven UI
like those on cell phones and tablets, but there was not much interpretation of well to
customary work area and workstation PCs, particularly in big business settings. In
Windows 10, Microsoft venture to address this issue and different behaviour of Windows
8, for example, an absence of big business neighbourly highlights.

The declaration of Windows 10 in September 2014 from Microsoft was made and
window insider was made that time. There was the discharge from Microsoft to Windows
10 by seeing the total population in July 2015. After that clients observed that Windows
10 is cordial than Windows 8 because it was more conventional interface, which echoes
the work area engaging format of Windows 7.

The Windows 10 consecrate Refresh, which turned out in August 2016, made some
modifications to the assignment bar and Begin Menu. It additionally presented program
augmentations in Edge and gave client’s access to Cortana on the bolt screen. In April
2017, Microsoft discharged the Windows 10 Makers Refresh, which made Windows Hi's
facial acknowledgment innovation quicker and enabled clients to spare tabs in Microsoft
Edge to see later.

The Windows 10 Fall Makers Refresh appeared in October 2017, adding Windows
Safeguard Adventure Monitor to secure against zero-day assaults. The refresh likewise
enabled clients and IT to put applications running out of sight into vitality productive
mode to safeguard battery life and enhance execution.

3.9 Python

Python is termed as interpreted, object-oriented, high-level programming language with

dynamic semantics. The high-level is made in data structures, in combination with
dynamic typing and binding, which helps in making it very attractive for Rapid
Application Development. It helps in scripting languages where the components are
together. Python is termed as very simple, easy to learn and has simple syntax. It helps in
reducing the cost. Python supports packages which encourages program code reuse. The
extensive standard library is available in source and can be freely distributed.
Often, programmers like coding in Python because it provides productivity. Editing
testing and debugging cycle is very fast. Debugging is very easy in python. Whenever the
interpreter finds an error it generates the exception. If this does not happen then
interpreter prints a stack trace. A source level debugger helps in inspection of local and
global variables, evaluation of arbitrary expressions, setting breakpoints, stepping
through the code a line at a time, and so on. The fastest way to debug a program is by
adding few print statements to the source.
 Chapter-4

Performance Analysis

4.1 Approaches to Sentence Extraction

The basic idea of extractive-summarization is to distinguish and extricate vital record
sentences and set up them collectively as a rundown; for example produced rundown is
an accumulation of unique sentences. There are many ways to deal with sentence
extraction. The accompanying subsections will depict three methodologies, in particular,
recurrence based methodology, include based methodology and machine learning based
methodology.

4.1.1 Frequency based approach

In each work based on content summarization, which was spearheaded, it was expected
that vital words in the record are rehashed ordinarily contrasted with the different words
in the record. Along these lines, demonstrate of the significance of sentences in the
record by utilizing word recurrence. From that point forward, a considerable lot of the
summarization frameworks utilize recurrence of the approaches in the extraction of the
sentences. Two procedures that utilization recurrence as an essential frame measures in
the content summarization is: word likelihood what's more, term recurrence reverse
record recurrence.

4.1.1A Word Probability

It was expected that one of the least complex methods for utilizing recurrence is done by
including the crude recurrence of the word i.e., by essentially including every word event
the archive. Nonetheless, the actions are enormously affected by the report length. One
approach is to get the modification for the report length is by processing the word
likelihood. The equation 1 shows the probability of the particular word:
The discoveries from the examination conveyed based on human-composed outlines
demonstrate that individuals will, in general, utilize word recurrence to decide the key
subjects of an archive. In case of summarization framework that misuses word likelihood
to make outlines. The Sum Basic framework initially processes the word likelihood from
the information archive. Each sentence Sj, it processes the sentence weight as a capacity
of word likelihood. Best scoring is picked up on the basis of sentence weight.

4.1.1 B Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency

Term frequency-inverse document frequency is customarily utilized in data recovery to

manage visit happening terms in a corpus comprising the similar documents. The
motivation is to inscribe the accompanying inquiry: Are on the whole substance words
that as often as possible show up in documents are similarly vital? For example, an
accumulation of news articles investigating seismic tremor fiasco will clearly contain the
word 'quake' in all documents. In this manner the possibility of tf-idf is to diminish the
weight age of visit happening words by looking at its corresponding frequency in the
document gathering. This property has made the tf-idf to be one of the generally utilized
terminologies in extractive synopsis. The frequency is defined as:-
Every word is partitioned and standardized from aggregate number of the various words
in document j. The term is used to weight the calculation is like the word likelihood
calculation given in Condition 1. The inverse document frequency of a word I is
processed:

Where, the total number is further divided in various number of the document in the
corpus which has different words. Based on Condition 3 and 4, the of word I in document
j is calculated:

4.1.2 Feature-based approach

The characteristic method to decide the importance of the particular sentence to

recognize the highlights that mirror the importance of that sentence. The three highlights
are characterized considered characteristic to sentence significance i.e., sentence position,
the nearness of title word and prompt words. For instance, the starting sentences in a
archive, as a rule, depicts the primary data concerning the archive. Along these lines,
choosing sentences in view of the position can be the sensible methodology. The
following highlights are typically determining sentence pertinence.
Sentence Position

The starting sentences in a record as a rule depict the primary data concerning the
archive.

Title/Headline Word

Title words showing up in a sentence could recommend that the sentence contains critical
data.

Term Weight

Words with high event inside the record are utilized to decide the significance of the
document.

Sentence Length

Sentences which are very short contain very less data and the sentences which are long
are not proper to speak to outline.

Based on Figure it delineates the basic model of an element based on the summarizer.
The scores are registered for each and every element what's more, joined for sentence
scoring. Before scoring of the sentence, the highlights are offered weights to decide its
dimension of significance. For this situation, highlight weighting will be connected to
decide the weights related to each highlight and the sentence score is then registered
utilizing the direct mix of each component score duplicated by its comparing weight:
Binwahlan et al. (2009) proposed a content synopsis display dependent on Molecule
Swarm Enhancement to decide component weights. The scientists utilized hereditary
calculation of rough the best weight blend for the multiple record summary. Different
development calculation is additionally been utilized to scale the pertinence of highlight
weights. Examination on the impact of various element mix was conveyed by Hariharan
where it was discovered that better outcomes were gotten to consolidating term
recurrence weight with position and hub weight.

4.2 Approach Using Deep learning

In this project we are going to use the concept of Deep Learning for abstractive
summarizer based on food review dataset. So before developing the model, let’s
understand the concept of deep learning. The basic structures of neural network with its
hidden layer are shown in the following figure.
Neural Networks (NN) are also used for Natural Language Processing (NLP), including
Summarizers. Neural networks are effective in solving almost any machine learning
classification problem. Important parameters required in defining the architecture of
neural network (NN) are total amount of hidden layers used, number of hidden units to be
present in each layer, activation function for each node, error threshold for the data, the
type of interconnections, etc. neural networks can capture very complex characteristics of
data without any significant involvement of manual labour as opposed to the machine
learning systems. Deep learning uses deep neural networks to learn good representations
of the input data, which can then be used to perform specific tasks.

4.2.1 Recurrent Neural Network (RNN)

Recurrent Neural Networks was formed in the year 1980’s but is very popular helps in
increasing the power which is computational from GPU. They are useful in terms of
sequential data because neuron can use its internal memory. It helps in maintaining the
information about the past input. This is great because in cases of language, “I had
washed my house” is very different than “I had my house washed”. The network helps in
gaining deep understanding of the given statement. A RNN contain loops in them where
the information is taken across neurons while reading the given input.

Here xt is the i/p, A is termed as a part of the RNN and ht is the o/p. The words are feed
from given sentences. Or even various characters from a string as xt and will come
upwards with ht. The ht is used as o/p and the comparison is done to given test data.
Hence, the error rate will be determined. After the comparison with o/p from test data the
back propagation technique is used. BPTT checks again with the help of network and
check and adjusts the weight depending on error rate.RNN is used to handle context from
the starting of the sentence where the prediction is correct.

4.2.2 Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) Units

The LSTM is RNN architecture which can remember past contextual values. These
stored values do not change over time while training the model. There are four
components in LSTM which are LSTM Units, LSTM Blocks, LSTM Gates and LSTM
Recurrent Components. LSTM Unit store values for long time or for short time. LSTM
has no activation functions for their recurrent components. Since there are no activation
function the values of units does not change for some period until the context is changed.
A LSTM Block contains such many units. LSTM’s are considered as deep neural
networks. These LSTM’s are implemented in parallel systems. LSTM blocks have four
gates to control the information flow. Logistic functions are used to implement these
gates, to compute a value between 0 and 1. To allow or deny information flow into or out
of the memory, multiplication of values with these logistic functions is done. To control
the flow of new values into memory, input gate plays key role. The extent to which a
value remains in memory is controlled by forget gate. Output gate helps in controlling the
extent where the value in given memory helps in computing o/p. activation of the block.
In some cases, the input and forget gates are merged together into a single gate, hence we
can see even 3 gate representations of LSTM. When new value which is worth
remembering is available then we can forget the old value. This represents the combining
effect of input and forget gate of LSTM.
4.2.3 Encoders and Decoders
For predicting sequence to sequence problems which is effective is known as Encoder-
Decoder LSTM. It contains two models: “one for reading the input sequence and
encoding it into a fixed-length vector, and a second for decoding the fixed-length vector
and outputting the predicted sequence”. Encoder-Decoder LSTM is designed specifically
for sequence to sequence problems. It was developed for NLP problems where it gave
state-of-the-art performance, majorly in translation of text called statistical machine
translation. The method for this thing is sequence embedding. During the task translation,
when the i/p sequence was reversed then model was more effective and it was effective
on long i/p sequences. This approach has also been used with image inputs.

The approach involves implementation of Bi-directional Encoders. The following figure

shows the structure of Bi-directional LSTM’s.

4.2.4 Attentive Recurrent Architecture

While designing Decoder we will implement Bahdanau Attention. Let, x be the i/p
sentence which consists of a sequence of “M words where x = [x1, . . . ,xM], where each
word xi is part of vocabulary V, of size |V| = V . Our task is to generate a target sequence
y = [y1, . . . , yN], of N words, where N < M, such that the meaning of x is preserved: y =
argmaxy P(y|x)”, y is termed as a random variable which denotes a sequence of N words.
Conditional probability is modelled by a parametric function with parameters θ: P(y|x) =
P(y|x; θ). We need to find θ that helps in maximizing the conditional probability of
sentence-summary pairs in the training corpus. If models generates the next word then
conditions can be factorized into a product of individual conditional probabilities:
Conclusion

As with time internet is growing at a very fast rate and with it data and information is
also increasing. it will going to be difficult for human to summarize large amount of data.
Thus there is a need of automatic text summarization because of this huge amount of
data. Until now, we have read multiple papers regarding text summarization, natural
language processing and lesk algorithms. There are multiple automatic text summarizers
with great capabilities and giving good results. We have learned all the basics of
Extractive and Abstractive Method of automatic text summarization and tried to
implement extractive one. We have made a basic automatic text summarizer using nltk
library using python and it is working on small documents. We have used extractive
approach to do text summarization.

We have successfully implemented state-of-the-art model for abstractive sentence

summarization to recurrent neural network architecture. The model is a simplified
version of the encoder-decoder framework for machine translation. The model is trained
on the Amazon-fine-food-review corpus to generate summaries of review based on the
first line of each review. There are few limitations of the model which can be improved
in further work. First limitation is that it sometimes generates repeated words in the
summary, the other problem is it takes too much time to generate a summary if the input
text size is large enough, the other issue is that for large text input it sometimes miss
interpret the context and generates exactly opposite context summary.
5.1 Future Scope

We have implemented Automatic text summarization using abstractive method. Further,

after using RNN and LSTM the accuracy is still very low for summarizer. Furthermore,
we will be using machine learning for semantic text summarization for more accurate
summaries and will try to make a grader which will grade the document according to
English grammar. There are many text summarizers available but all does not give
appropriate result. Thus we will be using machine learning algorithm to increase the
effectiveness of the automatic summarizer.
References
[1] Ahmad T. Al-Taani. “,Automatic Text Summarization Approaches” International
Conference on Infocom Technologies and Unmanned Systems (ICTUS'2017)

[2] Neelima Bhatia, Arunima Jaiswal, “Automatic Text Summarization: Single and
Multiple Summarizations ”, International Journal of Computer Applications

[3] Mehdi Allahyari, Seyedamin Pouriyeh, Mehdi Assefi, Saeid Safaei, Elizabeth D.
Trippe, Juan B. Gutierrez, Krys Kochut, “ Text Summarization Techniques: A Brief
Survey”, (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and
Applications

[4]Pankaj Gupta, Ritu Tiwari and Nirmal Robert,”Sentiment Analysis and Text
Summarization of Online Reviews: A Survey”International Conzatiference on
Communication and Signal Processing,August 2013

[5]Vishal gupta,Gurpreet Singh Lehal,”A Survey of Text Summarization Extractive

Techniques.”JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN WEB
INTELLIGENCE, VOL. 2, NO. 3, AUGUST 2010

[6]Jiwei Tan, Xiaojun Wan,Jianguo Xiao Institute of Computer Science and

Technology,Peking University “Abstractive document summarization with a Graph-
Based attentional neural model. ”

[7]Seonggi Ryang, Graduate school of Information science and technology, University of

Tokyo Takeshi Abekawa, National institute of informatics “Framework of automatic text
summarization using Reinforcement learning”
[8]Tian shi, Yaser Keneshloo, Naren ramakrishnan, Chandan K. Reddy, Senior member,
IEEE “ Neural Abstractive text summarization with sequence-to -sequence models”

[9]Jianpeng Cheng,ILCC,school of informatics,University of Edinburgh Mirella

Lapata,10 crichton street, Edinburgh “Neural Summarization by extracting sentences and
words”

[10]Alexander M. rush, Facebook AI research/ Harvard SEAS Sumit Chopra, Facebook

AI research Jason Weston, Facebook AI research “ A Neural Attention Model for
Abstractive Sentence summarization”