Received: 13 May 2021 Revised: 3 September 2021 Accepted: 27 September 2021

DOI: 10.1002/wene.420

ADVANCED REVIEW

Thermodynamic cycles for solar thermal power plants:

A review

Marta Muñoz | Antonio Rovira | María José Montes

ETS Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad

Nacional de Educaci

on a Distancia
Abstract
(UNED), Madrid, Spain Solar thermal power plants for electricity production include, at least, two
main systems: the solar field and the power block. Regarding this last one, the
Correspondence
María José Montes, ETS Ingenieros particular thermodynamic cycle layout and the working fluid employed, have
Industriales, Universidad Nacional de a decisive influence in the plant performance. In turn, this selection depends
Educaci
on a Distancia (UNED), C/Juan
on the solar technology employed. Currently, the steam Rankine cycle is the
del Rosal 12, Madrid 28040, Spain.
Email: [email protected] most widespread and commercially available option, usually coupled to a para-
bolic trough solar field. However, other configurations have been implemented
Funding information
Regional Research and Development in
in solar thermal plants worldwide. Most of them are based on other solar tech-
Technology Programme 2018, Grant/ nologies also coupled to a steam Rankine cycle, although integrated solar com-
Award Number: P2018/EMT-4319; bined cycles have a significant level of implementation. In the first place, power
Spanish Ministry of Economy and
Competitiveness, Grant/Award Number: block configurations based on conventional thermodynamic cycles—Rankine,
PID2019-110283RB-C31 Brayton, and combined Brayton–Rankine—are described. The achievements
and challenges of each proposal are highlighted, for example, the benefits
Edited by: Manuel Romero, Associate
involved in hybrid solar source/fossil fuel plants. In the second place, proposals
Editor and Peter Lund, Co-Editor-in-Chief of advanced power block configurations are analyzed, standing out: supercritical
CO2 Brayton cycles, advanced organic Rankine cycles, and innovative integrated
solar combined cycles. Each of these proposals shows some advantages
compared to the conventional layouts in certain power or source temperature
ranges and hence they could be considered attractive options in the medium
term. At last, a brief review of proposals of solar thermal integration with other
renewable heat sources is also included.

This article is categorized under:

Concentrating Solar Power > Systems and Infrastructure
Energy Efficiency > Systems and Infrastructure
Energy Research & Innovation > Systems and Infrastructure

Abbreviations: B-HRB, balance-hybrid Rankine–Brayton; CC, combined cycle; CCGT, combined cycle gas turbine; CR, central receiver; CSP,
concentrated solar power; DSG, direct steam generation; HRSG, heat recovery steam generator; HTF, heat transfer fluid; ISCC, integrated solar
combined cycle; ISCC-PR, ISCC with partial recuperation in gas turbine; ISCC-R, ISCC with recuperation in gas turbine; DRDE, double recuperated
and double expanded cycle; LCOE, levelized cost of energy; LFC, linear Fresnel collector; ORC, organic Rankine cycle; PTC, parabolic trough
collector; RDE, recuperated and double expanded cycle; SEGSs, solar electric generation systems; STPP, solar thermal power plant; sCO2, CO2 at
supercritical conditions; TES, thermal energy storage.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
© 2021 The Authors. WIREs Energy and Environment published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

WIREs Energy Environ. 2022;11:e420. wires.wiley.com/energy 1 of 19

https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.420
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
2 of 19 MUÑOZ ET AL.

KEYWORDS
advanced organic cycles, Brayton cycle, integrated solar combined cycle, Rankine cycle,
solar thermal power plant, supercritical CO2 cycle

1 | INTRODUCTION

The thermal use of solar radiation has two main applications: it can be used directly as heat, both at domestic and
industrial level (solar heat for industrial processes, SHIP); and it can be used in solar thermal power plants (STPPs) for
electricity production. The total capacity of STPPs worldwide is 9267 MWe at the end of 2020 according to
SolarPACES (2021), divided in turn into 6128 MWe of operational power, 1547 MWe under constructions and 1592
MWe, under development.
A STPP includes, at least, two main systems: the solar field and the power block. There are basically four concen-
trating solar technologies that can be coupled to a power cycle: linear Fresnel collector (LFC), parabolic trough collector
(PTC), central receiver (CR) systems, and parabolic dish (PD) (Zarza-Moya, 2018). Regarding the power block, it is com-
mon knowledge that the cycle performance is directly affected by the maximum cycle temperature, improving as that
temperature increases. Nevertheless, the solar field efficiency is lower as the working temperature increases, as the heat
loss also increases. Therefore, a thermal optimization is necessary to optimize the global efficiency of the STPP
(Breeze, 2016). Besides that, there are several technological challenges associated with high working temperatures:
materials, the working fluid (degradation in oils or corrosion in molten salts) and limitations due to the solar technol-
ogy itself (Mehos, 2017), as will be explain later.
Regardless the concentrating technology used, STPPs powered only by solar energy, show several important
drawbacks: the need of large extensions for the concentration mirrors, due to the low energy density of the solar
irradiation; lack of dispatchability as a consequence of the discontinuous nature of solar radiation; and the usual
requirement of an intermediate medium to transfer the thermal energy to the working fluid of the power block
(except in direct absorption receivers). The last drawback leads to a limitation on the maximum cycle temperature,
due to the maximum allowed temperature in the material, which is lower compared to temperatures reached in
combustion.
Regarding dispatchability, STPPs usually include a third important component, a thermal energy storage (TES) that
allows the energy surplus to be stored for its subsequent management, thanks to the solar multiple higher than 1 (over-
sizing of the solar field). There are several storage technologies: thermocline tank, dual-tanks with a high density fluid
(e.g., molten salts) or particles (Rovense et al., 2019), phase change materials (PCMs) and solid storage in bedrocks, this
latter one suitable when the working fluid is a gas (Steinmann, 2015).
Another possibility to improve the dispatchability is to arrange a hybrid layout with auxiliary boilers, natural
gas, or biomass (Powell et al., 2017). The hybridization provides a double benefit: the improvement in the manage-
ment of the plant and the possible increase in the working temperature at the power block inlet and, therefore, the
upgrade of the STPP global efficiency. If the hybrid configuration is based on a biomass boiler, the renewable
nature is kept.
In summary, the main advantage of the STPPs is its sustainability and renewable nature, while the main drawbacks
are the requirement of large land area for the concentrating mirrors, the dispatchability and the high cost of the tech-
nology compared to other energy sources.
STPPs can be classified according to different criteria, mainly the type of thermodynamic cycle the power
block is based on, the solar field technology, and the type of heat transfer fluid (HTF) employed. This work
focuses on the analysis of different configurations of the power block, describing the state of the art and its evolu-
tion over time, and putting forward advanced proposals. Section 2 is devoted to a brief description of the four
concentrating solar technologies usually employed in STPPs. In Section 3, the conventional configurations in
operational plants are described and classified according to the basic thermodynamic cycle employed: Rankine,
Brayton, or combined Brayton–Rankine. Finally, some advanced proposals are described in Section 4, in search
of solutions to increase efficiency and achieve lower generation costs. These proposals are either in a conceptual
development state or in a prototype phase, but preliminary research studies show some advantages over the con-
ventional configurations under certain conditions, and hence, they could be considered attractive options in the
medium term.
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MUÑOZ ET AL. 3 of 19

2 | CONCENTRATING S OLAR TECHNOLOGIES FOR STPPs

This section describes the four concentrating solar technologies usually employed in STPPs, paying special attention to
the maximum temperatures they can provide.
The PTC technology is the most common option in the commercially developed STPPs (Fern
andez-García
et al., 2010). Consist of a set of linear collectors with one-axis solar tracking and medium-high concentration factor
(between 50:1 and 100:1) that allows to reach maximum temperatures as high as 600
C approximately. The HTF in the
solar field, which transfers the solar heat to the power cycle, is usually synthetic oil, although it can also be molten salts,
water–steam in the case of designs of direct steam generation (DSG) or even air. The maximum working temperature of
PTCs is limited by the HTF degradation temperature—400
C in the case of Therminol VP1-, or by the selective coating
of the absorber tube—550
C in advanced tubes—(Montes et al., 2010). This technology is very mature and there are
multiple commercial designs, as well as different technologies for the absorber tube in the receiver.
CR plants consist of a field of heliostats, with two-axes solar tracking that concentrate solar radiation onto a receiver
(Romero et al., 2002) that can be designed as: (i) direct-absorption receiver on solid particles or a fluidized bed;
(ii) atmospheric or pressurized volumetric receiver; (iii) or indirect-absorption receiver by means of an intermediate sur-
face to transfer the thermal energy to the working fluid. The concentration factor is higher than in PTC, between 200:1
and 1000:1, yielding to higher temperatures in the receiver. Thus, the thermal efficiency of the receiver is lower than in
PTC while the conversion efficiency in the power cycle is higher, which may overcome the decrease of the receiver effi-
ciency. The search for innovative HTFs able to work at high temperatures has become an important research field.
Among the most promising ones, stand::advanced molten salts (Benoit et al., 2016; Turchi et al., 2018), pressurized


gases (Avila-Marín, 2011; Ho et al., 2014), liquid metals (Pacio & Wetzel, 2013), and solid particles (Chen et al., 2021;
Ho, 2016).
A LFC system consists of linear mirrors with one-axis solar tracking, with maximum concentration values similar to
those of a PTC, although lower at yearly-average basis. These systems were developed later than the PTC and CR tech-
nologies. LFC presents some advantages related to the land requirements and robustness. Lower investment, operation,
and maintenance costs can lead to savings of 11% in the electricity production (Morin et al., 2012). In addition, LFC
technology has many degrees of freedom in both the optical and thermal designs, which can be optimized (Montes
et al., 2016). Over a period of time, while the number of plants under construction was lower than that of PTC and CR
technologies, the number of studies was higher, due to the clear economic advantages of LFC. However, the promising
potential of CR technology has reduced again the interest on LFC, which has remained in a marginal niche compared
to CR (Wang, 2019).
Finally, the PD technology, with the highest concentration ratio, is suitable for driving small engines, commonly
stirling or micro-gas turbines, using air as the HTF. These systems allow large-scale generation (hundreds of MWe) by
replicating as many power unit as required (Hafez et al., 2016).

3 | S OLAR P LANTS BAS ED ON CONVENTIONAL POWER CYC LES

3.1 | Solar plants based on Rankine cycle

3.1.1 | Steam Rankine cycle solar plants

Steam Rankine cycles (SRCs), in several regenerative and reheating layouts, have been widely used in fossil or nuclear
thermal plants. The steam at the turbine inlet is usually superheated in the first and saturated in the second ones. These
cycles generally work with pressures below the critical pressure. The first STPPs were based on this conventional
scheme, coupling a PTC solar field to a SRC. SEGSs (Solar Electric Generation Systems) plants, built in California in
the 1980s, are an example of them. Figure 1 shows the layout of SEGS-VIII and SEGS-IX plants, that is very similar to
current PTC plants. The power block is a regenerative SRC with reheat. Superheated steam at the turbine inlet is at
371
C and 100 bar, and the reheating conditions are 371
C and 17.2 bar (Lippke, 1995).
At the early stages of STPP deployment, the research was focused on improving the solar field performance (Montes
et al., 2009). Despite of keeping a conservative power block configuration, some optimization studies were carried out,
for example, the optimal number of extractions or the influence of different cooling options in the condenser (Blanco-
Marigorta et al., 2011; Deng & Boehm, 2011).
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
4 of 19 MUÑOZ ET AL.

F I G U R E 1 Simplified scheme of the steam Rankine cycle coupled to a parabolic trough solar power plant. This layout is similar to
SEGS-VIII, SEGS-IX, and current plants (Montes et al., 2009)

Currently, the SRC is the most widespread and commercially available power block option, either coupled to a PTC
solar field working with thermal oil, and generating steam at 370–390
C and 100 bar or coupled to a CR solar field
working with molten salts and generating steam at 550–600
C and 180 bar.
In this type of STPPs, solar-to-electricity efficiencies are around 25%, since the power block is limited and its ther-
mal performance is in a range between 35% and 38% and the solar field efficiency is around 65%.

3.1.2 | Organic Rankine cycle solar plants

When the temperature of the heat source is in a low-to-moderate range (80
C< Tmax <300
C), organic Rankine cycles
(ORCs) are regarded as a suitable option. Organic fluids can condense at pressures above the ambient one and have low
boiling conditions that make them especially adequate to operate at low temperatures and pressures, either in subcriti-
cal or transcritical cycles, depending on the specific organic fluid selected.
ORC installations are smaller than conventional SRCs, due to the higher density of the organics fluids
compared to water; and simpler, as a consequence of the thermodynamic behavior of numerous organic
fluids, that present a positive gradient of the saturated vapor curve in the temperature–entropy diagram
(dry fluids), as seen in Figure 2. This behavior implies that the ORC expanders can operate with saturated
conditions at the inlet, increasing the mean heating temperature and ensuring that the expansion proceeds
and finalizes in the vapor region. This property involves a twofold technological benefit: superheating is not
always required to avoid humidity in the expander, although it may present advantages in some cases; and
the thermal heat associated to the expander outlet can be used to the recuperative preheating of the liquid,
without the need for more complex steam bleedings from the turbine (Figure 1). Therefore, compared with
water, the selection of dry organic working fluid brings significant benefits in terms of a reduction of costs,
bound to the absence of humidity. The lack of moisture increases the turbine thermal efficiency and reduces
its maintenance costs (Desai & Bandyopadhyay, 2016).
It is important to highlight that in order to select a suitable dry fluid for a specific use, the cycle performance is more
favorable when the fluid critical temperature is higher than the maximum cycle temperature or, at least, not much
lower (Desai & Bandyopadhyay, 2016; Lai et al., 2011). Provided that there is not availability of dry or isentropic fluids
with critical temperatures above 400
C, together with suitable condensing pressures, and keeping in mind the decisive
influence of turbine inlet temperature over cycle efficiency, ORCs have an important limitation, compared to SRCs,
when the heat source implies working fluid temperatures close to 400
C or higher.
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MUÑOZ ET AL. 5 of 19

FIGURE 2 Layout of a recuperative superheated organic Rankine cycle and T–s diagram

In consequence, ORCs have been generally proposed to be coupled to low-medium temperature renewable sources
(from 80 to 300
C) and for limited power rates, like biomass, geothermal, heat recovery, and nonconcentrated solar sys-
tems (Braimakis & Karellas, 2017; Zhai et al., 2016). Manufacturers have been present on the market since the begin-
ning of the 1980s, with many plants installed worldwide that use the low-medium temperature heat sources mentioned
above. Currently, this technology is being also proposed for concentrated solar systems, although its share is still very
low, with less than 1% of the total installed power. According to (SolarPACES, 2021), there are three commercial grid-
connected plants, located in Arizona (1 MWe), Morocco (3 MWe), and Denmark of (12 MWe) (Macchi & Astolfi, 2017;
Rodríguez et al., 2016).
In operating ORC plants, the fluids commonly employed are: toluene, R134a, R245fa, solkatherm, pentane, and
octamethyltrisiloxane, among others; several initially promising fluids were discarded due to their high inflammability
(Desai & Bandyopadhyay, 2016).
The research on the performance of ORCs coupled to a concentrating solar technology as heat source has been very
active lately. In (Astolfi et al., 2017), authors highlight its suitability for low-moderate temperatures. Petrollese and
Cocco (2019) also evaluate a recuperative ORC of 630 kWe, conected to a LFC solar field and operating under different
scenarios of HTF mass flow and temperature. Subsequently, in (Petrollese et al., 2020), they study a STPP based on an
ORC coupled to a LFC and a concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) solar field.
There are also various studies addressing the performance of ORC plants with power rates more similar to those of
plants based on the Rankine steam cycle. For example, in Desai and Bandyopadhyay (2016), a thermo-economic evalua-
tion model is developed to analyze the behavior of a 1 MWe ORC coupled to two different solar technologies, namely,
PTCs and LFRs. The use of several working fluids (i.e., natural hydrocarbons, siloxanes, R245fa, and R113) is analyzed,
including water as fluid for comparison purpose. In this study, when using PTC as solar field, the organic working fluid
that results in the lower levelized cost of energy (LCOE) is R113, while the use of Toluene implies the highest cycle effi-
ciency (31.2%). However, the former presents environmental problems, whereas the latter costs are still significantly
high. The LCOE results for water compete closely with those of R113. In the case of selecting LFC, Toluene also pre-
sents the highest efficiency (28%) and LCOEs are slightly higher for all 12 fluids analyzed. To sum up, it can be con-
cluded that ORCs are a good option in the case of low-medium power plants (less than 2 MWe) and distributed
generation. ORCs working with dry fluids offer higher nominal and off-design efficiencies at temperatures lower than
400
C, compared to SRCs. In those power and temperature ranges, steam Rankine plants lose the advantage of its
higher efficiency, characteristic of high power steam Rankine plants. The higher capital cost per kW of SRCs compared
to ORCs, at the considered power rates, is another drawback to be thought through.

3.2 | Brayton cycle solar plants

The coupling of solar energy to Brayton cycles is relatively new and less mature compared to Rankine-based cycles. The
main advantage of Brayton cycles over Rankine ones is the simpler and lighter installation as steam Rankine facilities
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
6 of 19 MUÑOZ ET AL.

are complex, with large equipment, such as the bulky condenser. However, the Brayton cycle presents lower efficiency
when operated with medium temperature heat sources, as it is the case of PTC solar technology with synthetic oil.
Really, to attain a competitive performance, the maximum temperature should be higher than 400
C up to 1000
C.
Therefore, they are generally proposed for high concentration systems like CR or PD (Figure 3a), where the combustion
chamber is replaced by the concentrated solar receiver. Hybrid fossil-solar configurations have been also proposed,
requiring systems of lower solar concentration ratios. The solar contribution may be employed, either to preheat the
combustion air, adding up to the recuperative contribution, as shown in Figure 3b, or to increase the production of
water–steam in parallel with the exhaust gas source in steam injection gas turbine, for power and efficiency augmenta-
tion (Livshits & Kribus, 2012).
Brayton solar plants coupled to CR systems are intended for medium-high power levels. For example, Rovense
et al. (2019) propose a design for a plant of 20 MWe based on a regenerative closed air Brayton cycle, with intercooled
compression, joined to a pressurized air CR. This design allows a turbine inlet temperature of 800
C and the possibility
to integrate a high temperature TES system. On the other hand, PD concentration systems are proposed for distributed
electricity generation (Meas & Bello-Ochende, 2017; Semprini et al., 2016). The integration of a micro gas turbine with
a solar dish has been analyzed as a promising option for several end use applications, in a power range between
100 kWe and 1 MWe (Al-attab & Zainal, 2015).
Finally, there is another configuration based on a closed Brayton cycle, characterized by the use of CO2 as working
fluid, which has also been proposed for concentrated solar power (CSP) applications (Kumar & Srinivasan, 2016),
among others. Since this option is still in a low technological readiness level, a detailed description of its special features
will be included in Section 4, devoted to innovative advanced configurations.

3.3 | Solar combined cycles

Combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) technology had an important development and implementation for high
power generation plants, that began at the 1990s. The heat recovery from the exhaust gas is used to generate
steam in a Rankine bottoming cycle, which entails a high global energy conversion efficiency. From the beginning
of its commercial deployment, the possibility of solar integration has been analyzed, either the solar-only option,
or the option with fossil hybridization. However, as the fossil heat source is introduced in the topping gas turbine
cycle, the solar-only alternative entails the replacement of the combustion chamber by the solar receiver, and the
use of high concentration solar systems, as explained in the previous section. Therefore, the option of fossil
hybridization has been preferred.
There is a wide consensus in the technical literature regarding the synergies between fossil and solar technologies.
Since the production of conventional combined cycle plants decreases those days/hours of high solar radiation, due to
the higher ambient temperature, the fossil-solar hybridization can take advantage, because it is just when the solar field
performs best (Rovira et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2015). Thus, the yearly operation comes up with higher values of solar-to-
electric efficiency.

FIGURE 3 (a) Solar only open Brayton cycle and (b) hybrid solar-fossil Brayton cycle with solar contribution to preheat combustion air
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MUÑOZ ET AL. 7 of 19

3.3.1 | Combined cycles with solar integration into the Rankine bottom cycle

The term ISCC (integrated solar combined cycle) generally refers to the particular configuration of combined cycles
with solar integration into the Rankine bottom cycle, as shown in Figure 4. This configuration was initially proposed by
the company Luz Solar International, and took advantage of the previous expertise gathered by the commercial opera-
tion of the SEGS plants, being nowadays the most used solar combined cycle configuration. Early studies proposed an
ISCC plant with two gas turbines and a SRC. The solar energy was incorporated in parallel to the boiler, by means of
heat exchangers that evaporated the preheated water before returning to the steam drum (Allani et al., 1997). Those
early studies discussed the advantages of the system, established the parameters of the boilers, designed the heat
exchangers in the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) and the solar generator, and carried out initial economic anal-
ysis. Finally, the economic unfeasibility of the layout, in its contemporary costs scenario, was highlighted and, there-
fore, it was concluded that there was need for economic incentives (Kane et al., 2000; Kane & Favrat, 1999).
At the beginning of this century, the research in ISCCs increased, mainly due to the installation of some facilities in
developing countries such as Argeria, Egypt, or Morocco, granted by the Global Environment Facility Agency. These
studies were focused on the economic feasibility and the production cost of different layouts (Dersch et al., 2004;
Mechthild Horn et al., 2004).
Nowadays, several ISCC plants have been installed, some of them thanks to the above-mentioned grants. Among
them, stand plants installed in the Aïn Beni Mathar (Morocco), Hassi R'mel (Algeria), Kuraymat (Egypt), Martin Next
Generation Solar Energy Center (USA), Archimede (Italy), and Yazd (Iran). There are other plants planned or under
construction, such as Agua Prieta II in Mexico, Al-Abdaliyah in Kuwait or Duba 1, and Waad Al Shamal, both in
Saudi Arabia.
Most of the plants, built or under development, consist of configurations with a solar field that provides heat in par-
allel with the HRSG, as mentioned before. PTC technology is the most used technology in ISCCs (Dersch et al., 2004;
Franchini et al., 2013), and the solar energy is transferred to the water/steam using an additional steam generator, fed
by synthetic oil coming from the solar field (Tmax = 390
C), except for Archimede, in which the HTF is a molten salt
(Tmax = 550
C; Falchetta et al., 2009). Therefore, solar energy contributes to evaporate water, like in Hassi R'Mel and
Yazd plants (Behar et al., 2011), although in some plants, solar heat provides a certain degree of steam superheating
(Aïn Beni Mathar and Kuraymat) and water preheating (Archimede).
Other solar concentration technologies have been also considered in theoretical studies, namely, CR (Reyes-
Belmonte et al., 2016, 2019) or LFC (Rovira et al., 2016). For example, Manente et al. (2016) compare ISCC plants using

FIGURE 4 Layout of integrated solar combined cycle based on parabolic trough collector (Rovira, Abbas, Muñoz, et al., 2020)
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
8 of 19 MUÑOZ ET AL.

PTC, LFC, and CR, concluding that it is not necessary a solar concentration factor as high as in CR to achieve 30%
solar-to-electric efficiency. Although the use of a HTF is more reliable compared to DSG, due to the difficult of control-
ling the two-phase fluid in the solar field, the latter has been also studied, considering the advantage of not requiring
an additional steam generator. For example, Rovira et al. (2018) compare the annual performance of ISCCs using the
three solar concentration technologies, PTC, LFC, and CR, in every case with DSG in parallel with the high pressure
evaporator of HRSG. Results show better performance in the case of PTC for both locations analyzed, with solar-to-
electric efficiency up to 37%.
When the plant includes a HRSG with 2 or 3 pressure levels, usual in conventional CCGT plants, a very important
issue is the selection of the optimal point in the cycle to integrate the solar energy. Many works have addressed this
analysis; for example, Calise et al. (2018) carry out a dynamic study of an ISCC with solar integration in the low-
pressure level of the HRSG. Brodrick et al. (2017) study the behavior of the ISCC layout with integration in the
intermediate-pressure level, and Li and Xiong (2018) working with DSG, propose to incorporate the solar heat simulta-
neously in parallel with both evaporators, at the high-pressure and the low-pressure levels. Similarly, Bonforte
et al. (2018) analyze the case of integration at the three pressure levels, including a management system to distribute
the solar heat source between the three evaporators. They conclude that the installation cost increase significantly,
whereas the fuel saving of the proposal is negligible. Rovira et al. (2013) compare four different layouts of integration in
a dual pressure HRSG, considering preheating and superheating as well as evaporation, both with HTF and DSG. They
work out that a lower HRSG irreversibility is reached when solar heat is used for evaporation at the high-pressure level,
compared to water preheating. Finally, Mabrouk et al. (2018) propose a layout that initially includes 11 heat
exchangers, each of them in parallel with the corresponding HRSG exchanger, but placed in series regarding the HTF
flow. Those exchangers are selected o discarded, deciding the optimal network for different values of the solar thermal
power. The performance study concludes that solar integration in high temperature exchangers is the most favorable
choice.
If the ISCC is specifically designed for boosting operation (solar plus full heat recovery), the turbine, as well as the
superheaters and economizers of the HRSG, must be oversized. That design would imply a lower turbine efficiency dur-
ing nonsolar irradiation periods, partially compensated by a higher steam production in the oversized heat exchangers.
Besides that, lower ambient temperatures, that could occur during nonirradiation periods, benefit gas turbine perfor-
mance, also mitigating the previous effect. However, if the plant is designed to operate in a fuel-saving mode, this over-
sizing would not be necessary. To perform a consistent analysis, this issue must be taken into account, when
comparing conventional CCGT and ISCC performances.

3.3.2 | Combined cycles with solar integration into the gas turbine

Although the most common scheme of solar integration in CCs is the solar heat supply into the SRC, particularly
at the high-pressure level (ISCC technology), the option of integration into the gas turbine has been explored as
well. Some layouts regarding the integration into the Brayton cycle have been already described in Section 3.2.
In the case of CCTG, for example, Amelio et al. (2014) propose to heat up the combustion air by passing it
through PTCs, managing without an intermediary HTF. Thus, the pressurized air coming out of the compressor
is sent to the solar field where is preheated up to 580
C, prior to enter the combustion chamber. As expected, the
fuel required to achieve a predetermined turbine inlet temperature is reduced. The authors estimated a fossil fuel
saving of 22% at design conditions, and 15.5% evaluating the annual performance. Duan et al. (2017) propose a
configuration that integrates solar contribution to preheat the combustion air, but with the peculiar feature of a
prior use of the air exiting the compressor to preheat water, that is then incorporated to the HRSG. Although the
air is thus previously cooled, the temperature achieved, the solar contribution is finally higher, which results in
a greater power generation and fossil fuel saving. Other designs also propose the use of a CR, to preheat the com-
bustion air (Okoroigwe & Madhlopa, 2016).Rovira et al. (2018) compare the annual performance of a reference
CCTG with the performance of two ISCC layouts that differ in the solar heat integration option: a conventional
ISCC scheme, in which solar heat is used to directly evaporate water (DSG) at the high pressure level of the SRC,
and a second scheme in which the solar heat is used to preheat the Brayton cycle combustion air. In both cases,
three different solar concentration technologies (LFC, PTC, and CR) are analyzed. Results show that ISCC with
combustion air preheating suffer a reduction in yearly energy production in comparison to the reference CCTG,
as a consequence of the pressure drop in the solar heat exchanger. On the contrary, DSG increases the yearly
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MUÑOZ ET AL. 9 of 19

production. Nonetheless, the former option entails notable higher solar-to-electricity efficiencies, with values
above 40% in the case of PTC and CR.

4 | S OLAR P LANTS BAS ED ON ADVANCED POWER CYCLES

4.1 | Innovative organic cycles

4.1.1 | Balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle

Rovira, Muñoz, et al. (2015) proposed a configuration named balance-hybrid Rankine–Brayton (B-HRB) cycle for mod-
erate temperatures heat sources, in a range between 350 and 400
C, as it is the case of moderate concentration factor
solar technologies. In that study, the proposed cycle was compared to several other cycles and/or different working
fluids, among them, different configurations of SRCs, ORCs (Acetone, R125), and sCO2 cycles. As can be observed in
Figure 5, the configuration implies the hybridization of a transcritical Rankine with a Brayton cycle, combination that
allows a low and constant temperature for heat rejection and a high mean temperature for heat supply. This configura-
tion also includes a single recuperator and a compressor to divert a fraction of the total mass flow in order to achieve a
quasi-balanced behavior of the recuperator, and very low irreversibility. These features lead to a potentially high cycle
efficiency, as well as a simpler facility, but require the use of a working fluid with specific properties. For example, dry
organic fluids, such as isobutane, propane, and R125, fulfill those requirements, namely: high critical temperature, that
allows condensation at adverse high ambient conditions; and low critical pressure (roughly below 25% of the maximum
fluid pressure), which implies a more constant specific heat during the heating process (Rovira, Muñoz, et al., 2015). As
a consequence, the B-HBR cycles working with either isobutane, acetone or R141b, reach higher efficiencies than the
transcritical ORCs analyzed under the boundary conditions of the study. In comparison with SRC, efficiencies are very
much alike, but with the considerable advantage of being a less complex facility, that includes a single recuperative heat
exchanger instead of the typical regenerative SRC layout (Figure 1). In (Muñoz et al., 2017), the study was extended to
analyze off-design operation, assuming that heat supply comes from a PTC solar field, with a maximum temperature of
397
C. The annual performance simulation is based on hourly meteorological data, corresponding to Almeria (Spain).
Among the various working fluids analyzed, the study concludes that propane and R125 are the most suitable, even
under adverse conditions. In the case of propane, cycle efficiency varies along the year between 41.37% and 30.2%,
whereas in the case of R125 cycle, efficiencies are slightly lower.
As depicted in the temperature–entropy diagram of this cycle (Figure 5), the working fluid temperature at the inlet
of the heat source exchanger (state point 4) is quite high, which in turn implies a high HTF return temperature to the
heat source system, that is just what is desirable to work with so-called closed sources. That is the case of the PTC solar
fields, that require a synthetic oil return temperature above a minimum value to guarantee a high solar thermal
efficiency.

F I G U R E 5 Balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle configuration and corresponding T–s diagram, in this case: p1 ¼ 1:2 MPa; p2 ¼ 17 MPa
working with propane (Rovira, Muñoz, S
anchez, et al., 2020)
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
10 of 19 MUÑOZ ET AL.

4.1.2 | Unconventional organic Rankine cycles (RDE and DRDE)

The B-HRB cycle described in the previous section is not adequate to be used as power block in heat recovery applica-
tions (open heat sources), where it is desirable to considerably reduce the temperature of the heat transfer fluid, associ-
ated to the waste heat source, to recover as much residual thermal energy as possible. Having this in mind, Rovira,
Muñoz, S
anchez, et al. (2020) propose a new configuration, derived from the previous B-HRB, but more suitable for this
kind of application. This configuration may have a role in solar plants with novel designs, as will be explained in the
following section. Figure 6 presents the layout and temperature–entropy diagram of the proposal that consist of a Ran-
kine cycle with two heating lines, owing to the split of the flow exiting the pump in two streams. The main one is
heated by the heat source, and then proceed to the expander or turbine. Given that the inlet temperature of this stream
is very low (state point 2), it is possible to recover a large percentage of the thermal energy from the main source. A
secondary stream makes use of the thermal energy associated to the main expander exhaust by means of the
recuperator. Since the fluid leaving this recuperator at supercritical pressure has a high thermal energy (point 6), a
secondary expander is incorporated downstream, thus increasing the power generation. Considering that this layout
includes a single recuperator and two expanders, it will be referred to as recuperated and double expanded (RDE) cycle.
Propane has been identified as a very good option as the working fluid in this cycle.
When the thermal heat of the secondary expander exhaust is significant (point 7), a secondary recuperator could be
used to preheat the main stream before entering the source heater; configuration that could be more convenient to
prevent excessively low HTF exhaust temperatures that may entail, for instance, acid condensation problems. This
configuration is named double recuperated and double expanded cycle (DRDE), and it has been proposed as the bot-
toming cycle in the configuration shown in Figure 9, that will be explained in Section 4.3.3.

4.2 | Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle

In recent years, the use of CO2 operating at supercritical conditions (sCO2) in recuperative closed Brayton cycles, has
gained notable consideration for power generation. This may be imputed to the specific characteristics of CO2, with
relatively low values of both temperature and pressure at supercritical conditions (30.98
C, 73.77 bar) and its very high
density, that implies a much smaller size of the equipment involved. In the case of the compressor, if the inlet condi-
tions are selected near the critical point (e.g., pressures between 75 and 90 bar and temperatures between 35 and 55
C)
the power required for compression is very low in comparison to the power generated by the turbine expansion. This
characteristic, together with a recuperative configuration, allows to achieve values of thermal cycle efficiency even
higher that those obtained with conventional superheated SRCs, with a simpler configuration. Two important draw-
backs must be mentioned: the lack of proven-commercially available technology for equipment working with supercrit-
ical CO2 (turbomachinery and heat exchangers); and, the peculiar behavior of CO2 specific heat near the critical point,
very dependent both on pressure and temperature. This latter feature makes it difficult to design the recuperator,

F I G U R E 6 Recuperative double expansion cycle (RDE) and T–s diagram (p1 ¼ 1:2 MPa; p2 ¼ 17 MPa; working fluid propane; Rovira,
Muñoz, S
anchez, et al. (2020))
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MUÑOZ ET AL. 11 of 19

because the specific heat of the two streams (i.e., the high temperature-low pressure stream and the low temperature-
high pressure stream), are very different. This problem is overcome by means of the use of a second recuperator
(low temperature recuperator [LTR]) and an auxiliary compressor (re-compressor). At the exit of the high temperature
recuperator (HTR) the flow is split, diverting a fraction through the re-compressor. The lower mass flow that circulates
through the higher pressure-lower temperature side of the (LTR) allows the balance of the specific heat capacities of
both streams. Figure 7 presents the layout and temperature–entropy diagram of the recompression supercritical CO2
cycle.
It can be said that the recompression sCO2 power cycle is one of the most studied cycles lately. As the maximum
temperatures of the working fluid are in a range from 500
C up to 1000
C, this cycle achieves thermal efficiencies that
can compete advantageously with other conventional options (Kumar & Srinivasan, 2016; Rovira et al., 2014; Wang &
He, 2017). Apart from CSP, this technology has been proposed for nuclear plants, geothermal systems, fuel cells and
high temperature heat recovery systems.
In relation with different sCO2 Brayton configuration options, Zhu et al. (2017) analyze the recompression configu-
ration together with other sCO2 layouts that do not include the bypass recompressor; instead they incorporate a
precompressor or partial cooling. Coco-Enríquez et al. (2017) compare the performance of a solar plant, based on a
SRC, with four solar sCO2 cycles configurations, all of them with reheating: the basic regenerative cycle and three
recompression layouts (the standard, the partial cooling, and the intercooling). In this work, several cycle parameters
are optimized by means of multivariable algorithms, for example: the bypass fraction, the main compressor total pres-
sure ratio and the intercooling pressure. The study concludes that a considerable efficiency enhancement is obtained,
compared to the conventional Rankine cycle option, if a recompression sCO2 cycle is selected as power block. Other
studies carry out optimization analyses of the recompression cycle parameters, aiming to increase the cycle efficiency.
Each study considers a specific solar technologies, mainly CR. In this line, Wang & He (2017) optimize a recompression
cycle with reheating; Binoti et al. (2017) optimize and compare additional layouts, considering main compressor inter-
cooling, partial cooling, and the conventional recompression cycle; Monjurul et al. (2020) study the off-design and
annual performance of a standard recompression cycle coupled to CR, comparing dry and water cooling; and Chen
et al. (2021) compare six different configurations, four of them with recompression, also considering the essential aspect
of the off-design performance. In this case the STPP includes a dry cooling system, a particle-based high temperature
receiver, and uses hot particles as the storage medium in TES. In this study the recompression cycle and the simple
regenerative cycle obtain a better off-design performance.

FIGURE 7 Recompression sCO2 cycle layout and corresponding T–s diagram, in this case: p1 ¼ 8:1 bar; p2 ¼ 20 MW;α ¼ 0:31
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
12 of 19 MUÑOZ ET AL.

An important issue to consider is the high value of the maximum pressure in sCO2 cycles. The compression ratio
must be higher than 2.5 to achieve an optimum cycle efficiency. That means pressures as high as 200 bar or even
300 bar, and heat exchangers that must work with a high pressure difference between both streams. For this reason,
printed circuit heat exchangers (PCHEs), designed to support a high mechanical stress, are commonly selected.
However, their design imply the flow through very small channels, so clogging problems can arise when using, for
example, molten salts as heat transfer fluid. To overcome this problem, Linares et al. (2020) propose a novel layout
where the heat power is supplied downstream of the turbine and, therefore, at the low pressure side of the cycle
(typically 80–90 bar). This option allows the use of a shell and tube design for the source heat exchanger when molten
salts are used, as it is often the case of CR solar systems.
Lately, important research programs, as the Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap from the National Renew-
able Energies Laboratory (NREL; Mehos, 2017) or the Australian Solar Thermal Research Initiative (ASTRI) (Gurgenci
et al., 2014), have selected the recompression sCO2 cycle for the power block of CR systems. The objective is to achieve
efficiencies higher than 50% while using simpler facilities, thus lower LCOE values. Numerous studies establish that it
is possible to reach that high efficiency with some of the layouts previously described and referenced, as long as the
inlet turbine temperature reach a value of at least 700
C. This value, that appears modest in a context of fossil Brayton
cycles, entails a challenge in the case of CSP. CR plants in operation use conventional molten salts (nitrate salts) as
HTF for the receiver and the TES, coupled to a conventional SRC. The HTF operational temperature is 565
C, therefore
below the maximum of 600
C that guarantees the stability of the conventional solar salts. However, CR operating
with sCO2-Brayton cycle requires the use of alternative high-temperature salts, able to operate at temperatures up to
750–800
C. At present, chloride ternary salts are considered a promising option; anyhow, in addition to adequate
thermophysical properties, the potential salt options must show good compatibility with possible alloys to manufacture
the equipment (particularly the receiver and TES hot tank) with essential properties, such as: sufficient strength,
corrosion resistance, as well as a non-negligible issue—admissible cost. Another promising technology to overcome the
problem to operate at 700–800
C maximum temperatures, is the use of solid particles in the receiver and TES, that has
been already mentioned in some of the referenced studies (e.g., Chen et al., 2021). In this case, also arise quite a few
of technological challenges, for example, efficient particle heating, fluidized-bed flow control, materials to endure
abrasion, among others.
In search of other options to increase efficiency, the integration of a bottoming ORC cycle to recover the rejected
heat of the sCO2 cycle has been explored, although the advantage of simplicity is compromised in that case. Along that
research line, Song et al. (2018) explore the potential of adding a bottoming ORC in the sCO2 cycle to improve its ther-
mal performance, carrying out a parametric optimization of that combined cycle, and Singh and Mishra (2018) analyze
a solar PTC plant feeding a similar combined cycle (a recuperative sCO2 and bottoming ORC). In both cases the sCO2
cycle do not include recompression and the maximum temperature is lower than 400
C.
Hou et al. (2018) carry out the optimization of a combined sCO2 recompression cycle (Tmax = 750
) with a regenera-
tive ORC using a zeotropic mixture fluid. On the other hand, Mohammadi et al. (2020) propose a layout for a hybrid
CR-GT-sCO2 solar plant, reaching high maximum temperatures (1000
C). The gas turbine exhaust gases feed two sCO2
cycles in series: a recompression cycle followed by a sCO2 partial cooling cycle. This configuration obtains lower LCOE,
because the sCO2 cycles include smaller components, expected to entail lower costs than those required in steam
Rankine bottoming cycles. However, the global thermal efficiency obtained was lower.

4.3 | Innovative configuration proposals for integrated solar combined cycles

4.3.1 | Integrated solar combined cycle using gas turbine with partial recuperation

The idea of CC with a recuperative gas turbine has been explored in several works, always in search of layouts that
would increase plant thermal efficiency (Carcasci & Facchini, 2000; Franco & Casarosa, 2002). However, this con-
figuration has not been implemented in commercial operating plants, because the advantages are not particularly
relevant. The improvement in gas turbine efficiency is balanced out by the lower temperature of the exhaust gases
that feed the HRSG, downstream of the recuperator. That lower temperature entails a lower steam production,
leaving aside the greater complexity of the layout. However, further studies follow this research line, but based on
the concept of partial recuperation and extended it to ISCC (Liu et al., 2018; Rovira et al., 2017; Rovira, S
anchez,
et al., 2015).
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MUÑOZ ET AL. 13 of 19

Having in mind the high solar-to-electricity efficiency obtained with the integration of the solar heat in
the gas turbine, Rovira, Abbas, S
anchez, et al. (2020) propose a layout of ISCC plant where the gas turbine
integrates a heat exchanger for Partial Recuperation (ISCC-PR). This layout, showed in Figure 8, aims to save
an amount of fuel equivalent to the solar input, without requiring any variation in the turbine inlet tempera-
ture.This proposal keeps the integration of the solar source in the bottoming cycle, as in standard ISCC, with
the advantage of using this reliable technology that ensures a constant steam production. However, in this
proposal the gas turbine exhaust is not sent in full to the HRSG. In periods of solar irradiation, when solar
heat contributes to the high pressure water evaporation, a fraction of the exhaust gases is sent to the gas
turbine recuperator, thus achieving a reduction of fuel consumption. That fraction reduces its temperature
and must be introduced downstream in the HRSG, at the high pressure superheater inlet, where it is mixed
with the main stream. When the partial recuperation takes place, the gas mass flow through the HRSG is
affected, and therefore, the fraction sent to the recuperator must be modified in each case, to maintain the
steam mass flow generated, as well as its temperature. This proposal achieves a solar-to-electricity efficiency
above 50%, using a proven technology for solar integration in the bottoming cycle, as in conventional ISCC
(Rovira, Abbas, S
anchez, et al. (2020)).

4.3.2 | Integrated solar combined cycle configurations based on ORC as the bottoming cycle

As other alternatives for ISCC, Chacartegui et al. (2009) propose a low temperature ORC, instead of SRC, as the bot-
toming cycle in medium and large power combined cycle plants. They conclude that while modern conventional CCGT
plants make use of gas turbines in the topping cycle with very high inlet temperatures, to achieve an efficiency close to
60%, combined cycle plants including a toluene ORC as bottoming cycle may reach similar global efficiency with a
more moderate turbine inlet temperature, that entails inferior values of NOX emissions, and lower manufacture and
maintenance costs.
In this research line, Cao et al. (2016) study the coupling of a ORC cycle to a low power gas turbine (12 MWe) and
Shaaban (2016) analyze the performance of a peculiar solar integrated combined cycle plant including two low temper-
ature cycles: a SRC and a ORC. The SRC is fed in the conventional way, by both heat sources: the solar heat and the
gas turbine exhaust. However, as in this proposal the gas turbine includes compressor intercooling, the ORC gets its
heat source from the cooler rejected heat. In (Zare & Hasanzadeh, 2016), authors analyze a configuration with two low
temperature ORCs and a recuperative gas turbine as topping cycle.

FIGURE 8 Layout of integrated solar combined cycle with partial recuperation in gas turbine (Rovira, Abbas, S
anchez, et al., 2020)
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
14 of 19 MUÑOZ ET AL.

F I G U R E 9 Layout of integrated solar combined cycle with recuperative gas turbine and double recuperation & double expansion
(DRDE) as bottoming cycle (Rovira, Abbas, Muñoz, et al., 2020)

4.3.3 | Other integrated solar combined cycles

These proposals seek to obtain new and more advanced hybrid configurations to integrate and manage both heat
sources: the solar source and the gas/biogas. The aim is to develop ISCC plants where, if possible, the solar contribution
becomes more important than the gas contribution. In (Rovira, Abbas, Muñoz, et al., 2020), different layouts with and
without solar integration, are analyzed and compared. This study includes a novel cycle that combines a topping recu-
perative gas turbine, aiming a reduction in fuel consumption, with an unconventional ORC (DRDE), as shown in
Figure 9. The recuperative configuration of the gas turbine entails a drop of at least 100
C in the turbine exhaust
temperature, which in turn means a reduction of the bottoming cycle power. The annual performance of all the
configurations considered is carried out in two different locations: Almeria and Las Vegas. These two locations present
different values of the mean annual ambient temperature (lower in Almería) and solar irradiation (higher in Las
Vegas), and those parameters have a significant influence in the annual performance.
The ISCC-R-DRDE presents a superior performance compared to the state-of-the-art CCGT and to ISCC, with a
higher annual mean efficiency. The results show that the fuel saving is more important in the colder site (4% vs. 2.5%),
whereas the solar irradiation level does not have a significant effect. From the thermodynamic point of view, the
authors conclude that the combination of a recuperative gas turbine and a double recuperative double expansion
organic cycle shows promising results.

5 | P R O P O S A L S O F I N T E G R A T I O N W I T H O T H E R RE N E W A B L E H E A T
SOUR CES

Several studies propose the integration of the solar source with other renewable sources. For example, Cakici
et al. (2017) analyze the performance of a supercritical regenerative ORC that integrates a geothermal heat source with
the heat from a solar field of PTCs. Jiang et al. (2017) consider those two renewable energy sources, geothermal and
solar, each of them individually coupled to a sCO2 recompression cycle, but with an integrated operation: the base-load
power is supplied by the geothermal plant whereas the solar thermal plant generates supplementary power to cover the
peak electricity demand. In relation to hybridization with biomass, Pantaleo et al. (2017) propose a combined cycle
composed of a biomass external fired gas turbine and a superheated recuperative ORC. The novelty of this proposal is
the use of a thermal storage system between the topping and the bottoming cycle, and the integration of a solar field of
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MUÑOZ ET AL. 15 of 19

PTCs connected in parallel with the thermal storage. Morrone et al. (2019) study a proposal of a transcritical ORC
driven by a PTC solar field and a conventional biomass boiler connected in series. The boiler operates if the solar
radiation does not satisfy the energy request. The study concluded that the biomass integration raises the annual net
solar-to-electric efficiency. Finally, integration with waste heat coming from industrial processes has also been
analyzed. For example, Bellos and Tzivanidis (2018) study the performance of an ORC driven by a solar field of PTCs,
with synthetic oil as HTF and an intermediate storage tank. In this proposal, the waste heat of low-medium grade
temperature (150–300
C) is mainly supplied to the economizer of the ORC steam generator. However, it may contribute
to the evaporation process, depending on the waste heat temperature and the working fluid employed.

6 | C ON C L U S I ON

This work has been focused on the analysis of different configurations of the power block in STPPs, describing the
state-of-art and its evolution over time; putting forward advanced proposals, highlighting their drawbacks and their
challenges. Currently, the SRC is the most widespread and commercially available power block option, usually coupled
to a PTC solar field working with synthetic oil. The hybridization is a valuable option, because it involves a double
benefit: the improvement in the management of the discontinuous solar source, and the possible increase in the maxi-
mum temperature of the working fluid in the power block, yielding higher STPP global efficiency. ISCC plants are good
examples of these advantages, and several projects worldwide have chosen this configuration. In this review, several
advanced alternative layouts of solar integrated combined cycle plants have been described (e.g., ISCC-PR, ISCC-R-
DRDE), proposed to further increase the plant thermal efficiency with a better management of both heat sources, solar
and fossil, and, if possible, increasing the solar source annual contribution. As CR technology is gaining prominence,
other power block options, that require high maximum working fluid temperatures, have been considered, as it is the
case of sCO2 Brayton cycles. This solar-only proposal presents the advantage of a high efficiency with a simpler facility
compared to conventional options. Other configurations, suitable to operate with moderate temperature heat sources
(ORCs, B-HRB) have been described as well, presenting promising results in specific ranges of temperature and power,
showing cycle efficiencies comparable to the SRCs but with the noteworthy advantage of being a less complex facility.
In summary, it can be stated that the current solar thermal electricity scenario consists of multiple available alterna-
tives, both for solar technologies and for power conversion, including hybrid systems. An economic assessment and
comparison of the different alternatives has not been addressed, because the results provided by authors, although
promising, involve high uncertainties, as new technologies need to make use of some components still under develop-
ment and not yet available commercially. Among the challenges to promote the advances power cycle, stands the devel-
opment of the involved turbomachinery and heat exchangers, which should work with nonconventional fluids and/or
under unconventional ranges of pressure, so currently their technological readiness level is low. Besides that, there are
several additional technological challenges associated with operation at high working temperatures (800
C), concerning
CRs and the TES systems. Different technologies are being proposed to tackle the problem, each one with their
own challenges, and in all the cases it is essential to find alternative HTFs with adequate properties, compatible with
materials to manufacture the equipment at an admissible cost.

A C K N O WL E D G M E N T
This work has been developed in the frame of the ACES2030-CM project, funded by the Regional Research and Devel-
opment in Technology Programme 2018 (ref. P2018/EMT-4319) and supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy
and Competitiveness through the PID2019-110283RB-C31 project.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

A U T H O R C ON T R I B U T I O NS
Marta Muñoz: Conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); methodology (equal);
resources (equal); software (equal); writing – original draft (lead). Antonio Rovira: Conceptualization (equal); data
curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); project administration (equal); resources (equal); software (equal); writing –
review and editing (equal). María José Montes: Conceptualization (equal); methodology (equal); resources (equal);
supervision (equal); writing – review and editing (equal).
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
16 of 19 MUÑOZ ET AL.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

ORCID
Marta Muñoz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-1236
Antonio Rovira https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6810-3757
María José Montes https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-8242

R EL ATE D WIR Es AR TI CL ES
Solar thermal CSP technology

FURTHER READING
Blanco, M., & Ramirez Santigosa, L. (Eds.). 2017. Advances in concentrating solar thermal research and technology, Woodhead Publishing
series in energy. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford.
Zhang, Y., & Li, P. (2017). Minimum system entropy production as the FOM of high temperature heat transfer fluids for CSP systems. Solar
Energy, 152, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.021

R EF E RE N C E S
Al-attab, K. A., & Zainal, Z. A. (2015). Externally fired gas turbine technology: A review. Applied Energy, 138, 474–487. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.049
Allani, Y., Favrat, D., & von Spakovsky, M. R. (1997). CO2 mitigation through the use of hybrid solar-combined cycles. Energy Conversion
and Management, 38, S661–S667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(97)00012-5
Amelio, M., Ferraro, V., Marinelli, V., & Summaria, A. (2014). An evaluation of the performance of an integrated solar combined cycle plant
provided with air-linear parabolic collectors. Energy, 69, 742–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.068
Astolfi, M., Lasala, S., & Macchi, E. (2017). Selection maps for ORC and CO2 systems for low-medium temperature heat sources. Energy
Procedia, 129, 971–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.217


Avila-Marín, A. L. (2011). Volumetric receivers in solar thermal power plants with central receiver system technology: A review. Solar
Energy, 85(5), 891–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.02.002
Behar, O., Kellaf, A., Mohamedi, K., & Belhamel, M. (2011). Instantaneous performance of the first integrated solar combined cycle system
in Algeria. Energy Procedia, 6, 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.05.022
Bellos, E., & Tzivanidis, C. (2018). Investigation of a hybrid ORC driven by waste heat and solar energy. Energy Conversion and Management,
156, 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.058
Benoit, H., Spreafico, L., Gauthier, D., & Flamant, G. (2016). Review of heat transfer fluids in tube-receivers used in concentrating solar ther-
mal systems: Properties and heat transfer coefficients. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
rser.2015.10.059
Binotti, M., Astolfi, M., Campanari, S., Manzolini, G., & Silva, P. (2017). Preliminary assessment of sCO2 cycles for power generation in CSP
solar tower plants. Applied Energy, 204, 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.121
Blanco-Marigorta, A. M., Victoria Sanchez-Henríquez, M., & Peña-Quintana, J. A. (2011). Exergetic comparison of two different cooling
technologies for the power cycle of a thermal power plant. Energy, 36(4), 1966–1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.033
Bonforte, G., Buchgeister, J., Manfrida, G., & Petela, K. (2018). Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis of an integrated solar gas
turbine/combined cycle power plant. Energy, 156, 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.080
Braimakis, K., & Karellas, S. (2017). Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source
types and capacities. Energy, 121, 570–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.042
Breeze, P. (2016). Solar thermal power generation. In Solar Power Generation (pp. 17–24). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-
804004-1.00003-8
Brodrick, P. G., Brandt, A. R., & Durlofsky, L. J. (2017). Operational optimization of an integrated solar combined cycle under practical time-
dependent constraints. Energy, 141, 1569–1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.059
Cakici, D. M., Erdogan, A., & Colpan, C. O. (2017). Thermodynamic performance assessment of an integrated geothermal powered supercrit-
ical regenerative organic Rankine cycle and parabolic trough solar collectors. Energy, 120, 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.
2016.11.083
Calise, F., d'Accadia, M. D., Libertini, L., & Vicidomini, M. (2018). Thermoeconomic analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle power
plant. Energy Conversion and Management, 171, 1038–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.005
Cao, Y., Gao, Y., Zheng, Y., & Dai, Y. (2016). Optimum design and thermodynamic analysis of a gas turbine and ORC combined cycle with
recuperators. Energy Conversion and Management, 116, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.073
Carcasci, C., & Facchini, B. (2000). Comparison between two gas turbine solutions to increase combined power plant efficiency. Energy
Conversion and Management, 41(8), 757–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00150-8
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MUÑOZ ET AL. 17 of 19

Chacartegui, R., S
anchez, D., Muñoz, J. M., & S
anchez, T. (2009). Alternative ORC bottoming cycles for combined cycle power plants.
Applied Energy, 86(10), 2162–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.02.016
Chen, R., Romero, M., Gonz
alez-Aguilar, J., Rovense, F., Rao, Z., & Liao, S. (2021). Design and off-design performance comparison of
supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles for particle-based high temperature concentrating solar power plants. Energy Conversion and
Management, 232, 113870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113870
Coco-Enríquez, L., Muñoz-Ant
on, J., & Martínez-Val, J. M. (2017). Dual loop line-focusing solar power plants with supercritical Brayton
power cycles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(28), 17664–17680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.128
Deng, H., & Boehm, R. F. (2011). An estimation of the performance limits and improvement of dry cooling on trough solar thermal plants.
Applied Energy, 88(1), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.027
Dersch, J., Geyer, M., Herrmann, U., Jones, S. A., Kelly, B., Kistner, R., Ortmanns, W., Pitz-Paal, R., & Price, H. (2004). Trough integration
into power plants—A study on the performance and economy of integrated solar combined cycle systems. Energy, 29(5), 947–959.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00199-3
Desai, N. B., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2016). Thermo-economic analysis and selection of working fluid for solar organic Rankine cycle. Applied
Thermal Engineering, 95, 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.11.018
Duan, L., Qu, W., Jia, S., & Feng, T. (2017). Study on the integration characteristics of a novel integrated solar combined cycle system.
Energy, 130, 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.118
Falchetta, M., Mazzei, D., Crescenzi, T., & Merlo, L. (2009). Design of the Archimede 5 MW molten salt parabolic trough solar plant. Proceed-
ings of SolarPACES 2009 Conference, 15–18 September 2009, Berlin.
Fern
andez-García, A., Zarza, E., Valenzuela, L., & Pérez, M. (2010). Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(7), 1695–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.012
Franchini, G., Perdichizzi, A., Ravelli, S., & Barigozzi, G. (2013). A comparative study between parabolic trough and solar tower technologies in
solar Rankine cycle and integrated solar combined cycle plants. Solar Energy, 98, 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.09.033
Franco, A., & Casarosa, C. (2002). On some perspectives for increasing the efficiency of combined cycle power plants. Applied Thermal
Engineering, 22(13), 1501–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(02)00053-4
Gurgenci, H., Stein, W., Beath, A., Blanco, M., & Sauret, E. (2014). The case for supercritical CO2 radial turbine development within the
Australian Solar Thermal Research nitiative (ASTRI) program. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Conference. Melbourne: Australian Solar
Energy Society (Australian Solar Council).
Hafez, A. Z., Soliman, A., El-Metwally, K. A., & Ismail, I. M. (2016). Solar parabolic dish Stirling engine system design, simulation, and
thermal analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 126, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.067
Ho, C. K. (2016). A review of high-temperature particle receivers for concentrating solar power. Applied Thermal Engineering, 109, 958–969.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.103
Ho, C. K., Conboy, T., Ortega, J., Afrin, S., Gray, A., Christian, J. M., Bandyopadyay, S., Kedare, S. B., Singh, S., & Wani, P. (2014).
High-temperature receiver designs for supercritical CO2 closed-loop Brayton cycles. Volume 1: Combined Energy Cycles, CHP, CCHP,
and Smart Grids; Concentrating Solar Power, Solar Thermochemistry and Thermal Energy Storage; Geothermal, Ocean, and Emerging
Energy Technologies; Hydrogen Energy Technologies; Low/Zero Emission Power Plants and Carbon Sequestration; Photovoltaics; Wind
Energy Systems and Technologies. V001T02A003. https://doi.org/10.1115/ES2014-6328
Hou, S., Cao, S., Yu, L., Zhou, Y., Wu, Y., &
Zhang, F. (2018). Performance optimization of combined supercritical CO2 recompression cycle and regenerative organic Rankine cycle
using zeotropic mixture fluid. Energy Conversion and Management, 166, 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.025
Jiang, P.-X., Zhang, F.-Z., & Xu, R.-N. (2017). Thermodynamic analysis of a solar–enhanced geothermal hybrid power plant using CO2 as
working fluid. Applied Thermal Engineering, 116, 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.12.086
Kane, E. H. M., Favrat, D., Ziegler, K., & Allani, Y. (2000). Thermoeconomic analysis of advanced solar-fossil combined power plants.
International Journal of Applied Thermodynamics, 3, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.48
Kane, M., & Favrat, D. (1999). Approche de conception et d'optimisation de centrale solaire intégrée à cycle combiné inspirée de la méthode
du pincement (partie II: Réseau d'échangeurs de chaleur). International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 38(6), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.
1016/S1290-0729(99)80024-6
Kumar, P., & Srinivasan, K. (2016). Carbon dioxide based power generation in renewable energy systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 109,
831–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.082
Lai, N. A., Wendland, M., & Fischer, J. (2011). Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles. Energy, 36, 199–211. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.051
Li, Y., & Xiong, Y. (2018). Thermo-economic analysis of a novel cascade integrated solar combined cycle system. Energy, 145, 116–127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.128
Linares, J. I., Montes, M. J., Cantizano, A., & S
anchez, C. (2020). A novel supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton power cycle for power
tower concentrating solar plants. Applied Energy, 263, 114644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114644
Lippke, F. (1995). Simulation of the part-load behavior of a 30 MWe SEGS plant. United States: N. P. doi:https://doi.org/10.2172/95571.
Liu, T., Zhang, G., Li, Y., & Yang, Y. (2018). Performance analysis of partially recuperative gas turbine combined cycle under off-design
conditions. Energy Conversion and Management, 162, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.01.075
Livshits, M., & Kribus, A. (2012). Solar hybrid steam injection gas turbine (STIG) cycle. Solar Energy, 86, 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
solener.2011.09.020
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
18 of 19 MUÑOZ ET AL.

Mabrouk, M. T., Kheiri, A., & Feidt, M. (2018). A systematic procedure to optimize integrated solar combined cycle power plants (ISCCs).
Applied Thermal Engineering, 136, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.098
Macchi, E., & Astolfi, M. (Eds.). (2017). Organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems: Technologies and applications. Woodhead Publishing is
an Imprint of Elsevier.
Manente, G., Rech, S., & Lazzaretto, A. (2016). Optimum choice and placement of concentrating solar power technologies in integrated solar
combined cycle systems. Renewable Energy, 96, 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.066
Meas, M. R., & Bello-Ochende, T. (2017). Thermodynamic design optimisation of an open air recuperative twin-shaft solar thermal Brayton
cycle with combined or exclusive reheating and intercooling. Energy Conversion and Management, 148, 770–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.enconman.2017.06.043
Mechthild Horn, M., Führing, H., & Rheinländer, J. (2004). Economic analysis of integrated solar combined cycle power plants. A
sample case: The economic feasibility of an ISCCS power plant in Egypt. Energy, 29, 935–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442
(03)00198-1
Mehos, M. (2017). Concentrating solar power Gen3 demonstration roadmap. (Technical Report NREL/TP-5500-67464).
Mohammadi, K., Ellingwood, K., & Powell, K. (2020). Novel hybrid solar tower-gas turbine combined power cycles using supercritical carbon
dioxide bottoming cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 178, 115588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115588
Monjurul Ehsan, M., Guan, Z., Gurgenci, H., & Klimenko, A. (2020). Novel design measures for optimizing the yearlong performance of a
concentrating solar thermal power plant using thermal storage and a dry-cooled supercritical CO2 power block. Energy Conversion and
Management, 216, 112980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112980
Montes, M. J., Ab
anades, A., & Martínez-Val, J. M. (2010). Thermofluidynamic model and comparative analysis of parabolic trough collectors
using oil, water/steam, or molten salt as heat transfer fluids. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 132(2), 021001. https://doi.org/10.1115/
1.4001399
Montes, M. J., Ab
anades, A., Martínez-Val, J. M., & Valdés, M. (2009). Solar multiple optimization for a solar-only thermal power plant,
using oil as heat transfer fluid in the parabolic trough collectors. Solar Energy, 83(12), 2165–2176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.
08.010
Montes, M. J., Barbero, R., Abbas, R., & Rovira, A. (2016). Performance model and thermal comparison of different alternatives for the
Fresnel single-tube receiver. Applied Thermal Engineering, 104, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.015
Morin, G., Dersch, J., Platzer, W., Eck, M., & Häberle, A. (2012). Comparison of linear Fresnel and parabolic trough collector power plants.
Solar Energy, 86(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.06.020
Morrone, P., Algieri, A., & Castiglione, T. (2019). Hybridisation of biomass and concentrated solar power systems in transcritical organic
Rankine cycles: A micro combined heat and power application. Energy Conversion and Management, 180, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.enconman.2018.11.029
Muñoz, M., Rovira, A., S
anchez, C., & Montes, M. J. (2017). Off-design analysis of a hybrid Rankine-Brayton cycle used as the power block
of a solar thermal power plant. Energy, 134, 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.014
Okoroigwe, E., & Madhlopa, A. (2016). An integrated combined cycle system driven by a solar tower: A review. Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, 57, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.092
Pacio, J., & Wetzel, T. (2013). Assessment of liquid metal technology status and research paths for their use as efficient heat transfer fluids in
solar central receiver systems. Solar Energy, 93, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.03.025
Pantaleo, A. M., Camporeale, S. M., Sorrentino, A., Miliozzi, A., Shah, N., & Markides, C. N. (2017). Solar/biomass hybrid cycles with
thermal storage and bottoming ORC: System integration and economic analysis. Energy Procedia, 129, 724–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.egypro.2017.09.105
Petrollese, M., Cau, G., & Cocco, D. (2020). The Ottana solar facility: Dispatchable power from small-scale CSP plants based on ORC systems.
Renewable Energy, 147, 2932–2943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.013
Petrollese, M., & Cocco, D. (2019). Robust optimization for the preliminary design of solar organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems. Energy
Conversion and Management, 184, 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.060
Powell, K. M., Rashid, K., Ellingwood, K., Tuttle, J., & Iverson, B. D. (2017). Hybrid concentrated solar thermal power systems: A review.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.067
Reyes-Belmonte, M. A., Sebasti
an, A., Romero, M., & Gonz
alez-Aguilar, J. (2016). Optimization of a recompression supercritical
carbon dioxide cycle for an innovative central receiver solar power plant. Energy, 112, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.
2016.06.013
Reyes-Belmonte, M. A., Sebasti
an, A., Spelling, J., Romero, M., & Gonz
alez-Aguilar, J. (2019). Annual performance of subcritical Rankine
cycle coupled to an innovative particle receiver solar power plant. Renewable Energy, 130, 786–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.
2018.06.109
Rodríguez, J. M., S
anchez, D., Martínez, G. S., Bennouna, E. G., & Ikken, B. (2016). Techno-economic assessment of thermal energy storage
solutions for a 1 MWe CSP-ORC power plant. Solar Energy, 140, 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.11.007
Romero, M., Buck, R., & Pacheco, J. E. (2002). An update on solar central receiver systems, projects, and technologies. Journal of Solar
Energy Engineering, 124(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1467921
Rovense, F., Reyes-Belmonte, M. A., Gonz
alez-Aguilar, J., Amelio, M., Bova, S., & Romero, M. (2019). Flexible electricity dispatch for CSP
plant using un-fired closed air Brayton cycle with particles based thermal energy storage system. Energy, 173, 971–984. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.135
 2041840x, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.420, Wiley Online Library on [21/04/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
MUÑOZ ET AL. 19 of 19

Rovira, A., Abbas, R., Muñoz, M., & Sebasti
an, A. (2020). Analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle with recuperative gas turbine and
double recuperative and double expansion propane cycle. Entropy, 22(4), 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22040476
Rovira, A., Abbas, R., S
anchez, C., & Muñoz, M. (2020). Proposal and analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle with partial recupera-
tion. Energy, 198, 117379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117379
Rovira, A., Barbero, R., Montes, M. J., Abbas, R., & Varela, F. (2016). Analysis and comparison of integrated solar combined cycles using
parabolic troughs and linear Fresnel reflectors as concentrating systems. Applied Energy, 162, 990–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
apenergy.2015.11.001
Rovira, A., Montes, M. J., Varela, F., & Gil, M. (2013). Comparison of heat transfer fluid and direct steam generation technologies for
integrated solar combined cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 52(2), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.12.008
Rovira, A., Muñoz, M., S
anchez, C., & Barbero, R. (2020). Advanced thermodynamic cycles for finite heat sources: Proposals for closed and
open heat sources applications. Applied Thermal Engineering, 167, 114805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114805
Rovira, A., Muñoz, M., S
anchez, C., & Martínez-Val, J. M. (2015). Proposal and study of a balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle for low-to-
moderate temperature solar power plants. Energy, 89, 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.128
Rovira, A., Rubbia, C., Valdés, M., & Martínez-Val, J. M. (2014). Thermodynamic cycles optimised for medium enthalpy units of concentrat-
ing solar power. Energy, 67, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.029
Rovira, A., S
anchez, C., Fern
andez, S., Muñoz, M., & Barbero, R. (2017). Integrated solar combined cycles using gas turbines with partial
recuperation and solar integration at different pressure levels. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1850(1), 060004. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.
4984412
Rovira, A., S
anchez, C., & Muñoz, M. (2015). Analysis and optimisation of combined cycles gas turbines working with partial recuperation.
Energy Conversion and Management, 106, 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.10.046
Rovira, A., S
anchez, C., Valdés, M., Abbas, R., Barbero, R., Montes, M. J., Muñoz, M., Muñoz-Ant
on, J., Ortega, G., & Varela, F. (2018).
Comparison of different technologies for Integrated solar combined cycles: Analysis of concentrating technology and solar integration.
Energies, 11(5), 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051064
Semprini, S., S
anchez, D., & De Pascale, A. (2016). Performance analysis of a micro gas turbine and solar dish integrated system under
different solar-only and hybrid operating conditions. Solar Energy, 132, 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.012
Shaaban, S. (2016). Analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle with steam and organic Rankine cycles as bottoming cycles. Energy Con-
version and Management, 126, 1003–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.075
Singh, H., & Mishra, R. S. (2018). Performance analysis of solar parabolic trough collectors driven combined supercritical CO2 and organic
Rankine cycle. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 21(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2018.03.015
SolarPACES. (2021). https://www.solarpaces.org/csp-technologies/csp-projects-around-the-world/
Song, J., Li, X., Ren, X., & Gu, C. (2018). Performance analysis and parametric optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) cycle
with bottoming organic Rankine cycle (ORC). Energy, 143, 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.136
Steinmann, W.-D. (2015). Thermal energy storage systems for concentrating solar power (CSP) technology. In Advances in thermal energy
storage systems (pp. 511–531). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782420965.4.511
Turchi, C. S., Vidal, J., & Bauer, M. (2018). Molten salt power towers operating at 600–650
C: Salt selection and cost benefits. Solar Energy,
164, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.063
Wang, K., & He, Y.-L. (2017). Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a molten salt solar power tower integrated with a recompression
supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle based on integrated modeling. Energy Conversion and Management, 135, 336–350. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.enconman.2016.12.085
Wang, Z. (2019). Design of solar thermal power plants (1st ed.). Elsevier.
Zare, V., & Hasanzadeh, M. (2016). Energy and exergy analysis of a closed Brayton cycle-based combined cycle for solar power tower plants.
Energy Conversion and Management, 128, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.080
Zarza-Moya, E. (2018). Concentrating solar thermal power. In A comprehensive guide to solar energy systems (pp. 127–148). Elsevier. https://
doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811479-7.00007-5
Zhai, H., An, Q., Shi, L., Lemort, V., & Quoilin, S. (2016). Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 790–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.076
Zhu, G., Neises, T., Turchi, C., & Bedilion, R. (2015). Thermodynamic evaluation of solar integration into a natural gas combined cycle power
plant. Renewable Energy, 74, 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.073
Zhu, H.-H., Wang, K., & He, Y.-L. (2017). Thermodynamic analysis and comparison for different direct-heated supercritical CO2 Brayton
cycles integrated into a solar thermal power tower system. Energy, 140, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.067

How to cite this article: Muñoz, M., Rovira, A., & Montes, M. J. (2022). Thermodynamic cycles for solar
thermal power plants: A review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 11(2), e420. https://doi.
org/10.1002/wene.420