A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master’s degree in
Management from the Nova School of Business and Economics.
CONSULTING 4.0: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE AND POTENTIAL
OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE CONSULTANCY OF TOMORROW
W
MARCO WALL
IE
EV
PR
Work project carried out under the supervision of:
Paulo Faroleiro
22/01/2024
Abstract
The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Generative AI (GenAI), has
catalyzed significant shifts across business sectors, revolutionizing traditional operational
models. This study focuses on the consulting industry, a key player in AI integration and
advancement. It explores AI's impact in four domains: establishment in consulting, application
areas, internal process effects, and ethical considerations. Utilizing triangulation, combining
Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and qualitative interviews, this analysis comprehensively
understands AI's diverse effects on the consulting industry. It reveals the current state of AI
deployment, highlighting its business value and transformative influence in the consulting
sector.
W
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Consulting; AI in Consulting; GenAI; Strategies with AI
IE
Acknowledgement
EV
I would like to acknowledge and give my warmest thanks to my supervisor Paulo Faroleiro,
who made this work possible. His guidance and advice carried me through all stages of
writing this thesis.
PR
This work used infrastructure and resources funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a
Tecnologia (UID/ECO/00124/2013, UID/ECO/00124/2019 and Social Sciences DataLab,
Project 22209), POR Lisboa (LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007722 and Social Sciences
DataLab, Project 22209) and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209).
1
1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3
2. Theoretical background ................................................................................................... 4
2.1. Artificial Intelligence & GenAI ................................................................................... 4
2.2. Consulting industry...................................................................................................... 5
2.3. AI usage at work .......................................................................................................... 6
3. Research methodology ...................................................................................................... 7
3.1. Research questions ...................................................................................................... 7
3.2. Triangulation ............................................................................................................... 7
3.3. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) ........................................................................... 8
3.3.1. Planning the review.................................................................................................. 8
3.3.2. Conducing the review ............................................................................................ 10
3.4. Qualitative research ................................................................................................... 10
W
3.4.1. Sample selection .................................................................................................... 11
3.4.2. Data collection ....................................................................................................... 12
3.4.3. Data analysis .......................................................................................................... 12
IE
4. Analysis and findings ...................................................................................................... 13
4.1. SLR results ................................................................................................................ 13
EV
4.1.1. RQ1 - Prevalence of AI technology ....................................................................... 13
4.1.2. RQ2 - Areas of consulting ..................................................................................... 15
4.1.3. RQ3 - Organizational effects on work processes ................................................... 16
4.1.4. RQ4 - Ethical governance in AI integration .......................................................... 17
PR
4.2. Qualitative research results ........................................................................................ 18
4.2.1. RQ1 - Prevalence of AI technology ....................................................................... 19
4.2.2. RQ2 - Areas of consulting ..................................................................................... 20
4.2.3. RQ3 - Organizational effects on work processes ................................................... 21
4.2.4. RQ4 - Ethical governance in AI integration .......................................................... 21
4.3. Triangulation results .................................................................................................. 22
5. Discussion......................................................................................................................... 23
5.1. Limitations and considerations .................................................................................. 23
5.2. Directions for future research .................................................................................... 24
5.3. Managerial implications ............................................................................................ 25
5.4. Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 25
6. References ........................................................................................................................ 26
7. Appendices ....................................................................................................................... 32
2
1. Introduction
The consulting industry is at the dawn of a new era in which artificial intelligence (AI) is
increasingly relevant. Through its explorative growth phase in 2023, Generative AI has ensured
that at least a third of companies use the technology in at least one business function (McKinsey,
2023). Large Language Models (LLM), such as Chat GPT, attracted a million users in five days
and 100 million requests in two months (Reuters, 2023). From another perspective, the
transition of topics from technical departments to the focus on corporate management is
becoming clear (McKinsey, 2023). In this context, the consulting industry plays a key role, as
it is an essential value driver for other industries (Cerruti et al., 2019).
W
Nevertheless, the question remains about how the consulting industry will deal with this
technological progress. Christensen et al. (2013) have already highlighted the change in the
IE
consulting industry, which manifests itself in a stronger focus on software- and technology-
based solutions. This development points to a fundamental transformation of the consulting
EV
industry, in which traditional approaches based on human expertise are increasingly
complemented and enhanced by innovative, technology-based methods (Lemus-Aguilar &
PR
Hidalgo, 2014).
Recent studies show that using AI impacts the business model (Kanbach et al., 2023). Using AI
in the consulting industry can increase efficiency (Dell'Acqua et al., 2023) but also entails
increased ethical risks (Genguta et al., 2023). However, there are currently only a limited
number of studies that look at the holistic impact of AI on the consulting industry. The purpose
of this research is to give a comprehensive overview of how AI influences the consulting
industry by examining four main areas: the degree of establishment of AI in consulting, areas
of application of AI in consulting, effects on internal processes, and effects on ethical risks and
concerns using AI.
3
This paper is structured as follows: The theoretical background introduces the topic and
explains the most important definitions. Subsequently, the research questions are first answered
with the help of a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and then further illuminated and
expanded with in-depth qualitative interviews. Using triangulation, the results of both
methodologies are combined. The paper concludes with a discussion of the results, including
limitations and directions for future research. This study is one of the first to merge the
combinatorics of the consulting industry with AI technology.
2. Theoretical background
The theoretical background defines important terminologies and insights into the consulting
W
industry and the current state of AI usage at work.
2.1. Artificial Intelligence & GenAI
IE
The academic and management literature does not provide one clear definition of AI. The
academic consensus of AI can be seen as a new way of programming computers so that they
EV
ultimately think humanly (Sarker, 2022). Huang et al. (2019) defined AI as a field that uses
algorithms and computational approaches to machine intelligence that were previously only
used by humans. Sophisticated decision-making processes such as automatic control and
PR
predictive analytics utilize AI systems far superior to humans. In particular, machine learning,
including deep learning and neural networks, enables a system to learn without explicit
programming (LeCun et al., 2015).
The emergence and application of AI technology impact almost all areas of life and the
economy and are arguably one of the most significant phenomena in science and contemporary
history (Zhang & Aslan, 2021). The research literature also reflects an annual increase of 23%
in the number of publications on this topic (Baruffaldi et al., 2020). Interestingly, however,
building blocks of this phenomenon were developed many decades ago, in the mid-twentieth
century, when mathematician Alan Turing coined the concept of “intelligent machines”
(Turing, 1950, p. 459). The first academic paper on the subject of "artificial intelligence" was
4
published by McCarthy et al. (1955). An academic winter occurred between 1970 and 1990
(Caner & Bhatti, 2020). At the beginning of the 21st century, Generative AI, often abbreviated
as GenAI (Kanbach et al., 2023), revolutionized the progress of this technology as a subfield of
artificial intelligence. This branch was revolutionized with the introduction of Generative
Adversarial Networks (GANs) by Goodfellow et al. (2014), which have the remarkable ability
to generate highly realistic images, text, and other artifacts, often indistinguishable from
human-generated content, based on previously learned patterns and data inputs. Another
notable milestone on the road to GenAI has been the development of Large Language Models
(LLMs), such as the Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) series, which demonstrate an
impressive ability to understand and generate human-like text and assist in tasks ranging from
W
writing assistance to conversation simulation (Radford et al., 2019). These models learn from
IE
massive datasets, allowing them to capture nuances of language and a wide range of knowledge,
facilitating their use in various applications. As Generative AI continues to evolve, its potential
EV
to reshape industries and the nature of creativity is increasingly recognized. Ethical discussions
about authenticity, copyright, and potential for misuse are also intensifying, highlighting the
PR
need for responsible use and governance of GenAI technologies (Zhang & Aslan, 2021). The
development of GenAI is a step towards AI that analyzes data and enriches the human
experience with novel creations.
2.2. Consulting industry
Consulting is an intricate, adaptive, and innovative industry. The land of consulting as we know
it today dates back to the beginning of the 20th century when Frederick W. Taylor developed his
principles of scientific management (Kipping & Clark, 2012). Consulting, or management
consulting, is a professional service experienced consultants provide to an organization to
achieve operation performance objectives through complete and accurate analysis of all business
problems affecting organizations, thus making improvement plans (Kubr, 2002). Over the years,
the field has expanded and diversified to cover strategy consulting, management consulting,
5
operations consultancy services, IT consultancy services, and many more specializations.
Nowadays, the consulting industry is experiencing a digitalization turn – the changes that affect
all business spheres are occurring (Christensen et al., 2013). Innovation supported by artificial
intelligence is becoming the critical value-add of consulting firms whose clients’ demands are
growing and must be met (Davenport et al., 2020). Data analysis tools are seen as essential tools
in consulting, as they analyze large amounts of data quickly and, therefore, have the potential to
improve customer expectations where necessary (Bughin et al., 2017).
The consulting industry faces increased niche providers amidst the democratization of
information access and the requirement to consult in a world market (Greiner & Ennsfellner,
2010). Thus, consulting firms must improve their internal operations and develop inventive,
W
client-sensitive approaches to remain competitive.
IE
The prospects for the future development of the consulting industry hinge on more profound AI
and other high-tech integrations, transforming not just the content of consulting services but
EV
also the structures and strategies followed by consulting firms (Nissen, 2019).
2.3. AI usage at work
Artificial intelligence adoption is common in different industries like manufacturing (Rizvi et
PR
al., 2021), marketing (Martínez-López & Casillas, 2013), entertainment (Nader et al., 2022),
medicine (Paul et al., 2021), and finance (Guo & Polak, 2021) among others. Such keywords,
e.g., neural networks, machine learning, or deep learning, are often associated with business
terms like decision-making, industry 4.0, or business transformation (Ruiz-Real et al., 2021).
Adopting these technologies typically aims to improve efficiency by streamlining business
processes or enhancing company decision-making. (Borges et al., 2021).
This is achieved by transforming traditional work processes to incorporate AI, including
automating routine tasks and affecting decision-making (Davenport et al., 2020). The
technological shift gives rise to the automation of unskilled jobs, replaced by new roles calling
for different skills and creating new workplace dynamics (Kapoor & Ghosal, 2022).
6
Nevertheless, it is very difficult to implement the technology with these kinds of non-routine
tasks since such tasks demand creativity, problem-solving, and complex communication (Priya
et al., 2022).
Generally, it is evident that AI, as a developmental force, offers both an opportunity to associate
workers and risks. AI integration effectively balances possible technical approaches and
corresponding morals (Sidorenko et al., 2021). This work depicts these factors and how they
are now reflected in the consulting industry.
3. Research methodology
This section describes the methodology used to answer research questions through
W
triangulation, including a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and qualitative interviews.
3.1. Research questions
IE
This research is based on several well-defined research questions (RQs) that seek to answer the
varied functions of AI in the consulting practice. The questions are crafted to capture the core
EV
issues surrounding AI inclusion into consultancy that relate to contemporary problems and
forthcoming trends in the field:
• RQ1: How established is artificial intelligence adoption within the consulting industry?
PR
• RQ2: In which areas of consulting is artificial intelligence most prominently applied?
• RQ3: How does artificial intelligence affect inner processes inside consulting
companies and the demand for their offerings?
• RQ4: What ethical risks and concerns are associated with integrating AI in consulting?
The aim of each of these questions is to ensure that this study encompasses as comprehensive
an understanding of the role and potential of AI in shaping the consulting industry as possible
and covers all aspects of AI influence in a business context.
3.2. Triangulation
The study utilizes the methodology of triangulation, which refers to using multiple methods or
data sources in qualitative research to develop a comprehensive understanding of complex
7
phenomena (Patton, 1999). Due to the multifaceted nature of the AI impact on the consulting
industry, it is necessary to create a theoretical foundation and comprehensive overview of the
existing literature using an SLR and obtain in-depth and detail from practitioners' opinions
through qualitative interviews (Jack & Raturi, 2006). Both data and method triangulation are
used to ensure a comprehensive and robust research process (Guion et al., 2011). Data
triangulation is achieved using diverse information, including scientific literature and expertise.
The triangulation method combines insights from the SLR and qualitative interviews to create
a holistic understanding and utilize the two methodological logics (Patton, 1990). This approach
aligns with the recommendations of Denzin (1978), who emphasizes the importance of using
multiple data sources for a comprehensive analysis.
3.3. Systematic Literature Review (SLR)
W
The method of conducting SLR is adaptive, as used by Tranfield et al. (2003) and Gough et al.
IE
(2013). This methodology has been previously applied in some information systems (Al-Emran
EV
et al., 2018), technology applications (Ali et al., 2018; Gupta et al., 2018), and operations
research studies (Martins et al., 2019). For example, Caner and Bhatti (2020) adopted this
method to identify AI strategies deployed in the business industry. The SLR consists of three
PR
steps: "Planning the review," "Conducting the review," and "Reporting on the review." The
initial stage involves finding whether there is a necessity for responding to the abovementioned
research questions. There is a need to review what is currently known in the area due to the
transformative nature of artificial intelligence (AI) in diverse business domains (Caner & Bhatti,
2020), including consulting, and the increasing interest in professional services firms to adopt
AI capabilities (Bezuidenhout et al., 2022). Especially given the new requirements, technological
opportunities, and ethical considerations facing consulting firms (Christensen et al., 2013).
3.3.1. Planning the review
Informed by the research questions and drawing from the theoretical background of AI,
information technology, and the consulting industry, this study focuses on the following key
8
terms: "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "deep learning", "neural networks",
"consulting", "consultancy", "professional service firms", "KIBS", "digital transformation",
"change management", "digital strategy", "digital", "demand" and “ethics”. The search was
conducted at the title level, combining title, abstract, and keywords. The specific combinations
of the key terms are detailed in Table 1 of the Appendix.
The digital databases consulted for this study include Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct,
and Emerald, each widely used in previous literature (Agarwal et al., 2019; Busalim, 2016; Rekik
et al., 2018). A supplementary search was conducted using Google Scholar to cover broader
scholarly perspectives.
Aligning with the guidelines by Kitchenham et al. (2009), the inclusion criteria for this review
W
were as follows: (i) Journal and conference papers that discuss artificial intelligence and
IE
consulting or cover topics related to digital transformation even without explicitly mentioning
AI, containing the terms in title, abstract, or keywords, (ii) Peer-reviewed articles, ensuring the
EV
research has undergone quality assessment (iii) Papers published since 2009 to align with
emerging trends in AI and consulting (López-Robles et al., 2019). Exclusion criteria were
PR
established to exclude: (i) Studies that mention artificial intelligence only tangentially without
direct relevance to consulting, (ii) Non-peer-reviewed sources, such as blogs or opinion pieces,
and (iii) Full articles not available electronically.
The PRISMA approach (Moher et al., 2015) was used for quality assessment, providing a
standardized method for evaluating the relevancy and credibility of the studies reviewed. Data
extraction was planned to align with the research questions and highlight differences and
similarities among study outcomes. The extracted elements include the source of publication,
year of publication, author(s), functions of AI technology in the consulting context, ethical
considerations in AI application, method of research, impacts of AI, target consulting sub-
industry, and challenges to AI adoption if available.
9
For the research synthesis phase, the studies were examined through the lens of the established
research questions. Methods for synthesizing and integrating the findings from different studies
were tailored to highlight how each addresses or relates to the specific research questions. This
approach aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the role and impact of AI in the consulting
industry.
3.3.2. Conducing the review
The search aimed to systematically identify and summarize the fragmented literature on the role
of AI in the consulting industry. The process involved the following stages:
• Initially, search terms were applied to titles, abstracts, and keywords without constraints.
The metadata—the title, authors, abstract, publication year, keywords, source title,
W
document type, and language—were exported directly into EndNote for efficient duplicate
removal.
IE
• After this preliminary step, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were stringently applied.
EV
Now, meeting the requirements, the selected articles were exported from EndNote to
Microsoft Excel for additional analysis. This involved screening the abstracts and forming
further classifications to identify the relevance to the research questions.
PR
• Finally, data extraction was based on the full content of each selected article. A star-rating
system was used to gauge the relevance of each article to the research questions: 1 Star for
general relevance based on all inclusion criteria; 2 Stars for potential to answer a research
question indirectly; 3 Stars for direct relevance to a research question.
3.4. Qualitative research
For this review to suffice in exploring the deeply embedded nature of AI within the consulting
industry, it must exceed what is currently available in ambition and insight (Myers, 2019).
Though there is some incorporation of insights from SLR, a lack of explicit research on the
augmentation of AI and consulting still exists. In particular, qualitative approaches are
especially well-suited to the research of these emerging and rapidly evolving industries and
10
firms such as AI and consultancy (Neuman, 2014). This research applies an interview-based
methodology to seek consultation with the experts on how AI has specifically impacted their
work and experiences (Taylor et al., 2015). This study applies the inductive coding
methodology from the Grounded Theory perspective (Glaser & Strauss, 2017) since AI
implementation is nascent in the consulting industry. Although primarily inductive, the research
questions, informed by the theoretical background, introduce a structured, deductive element to
the interview guide, ensuring a comprehensive approach. This approach was instrumental in
guiding the development of themes and in understanding the role played by AI through data
analysis (Gioia et al., 2013). Applying an inductive technique in this study is expected to
uncover findings and unique patterns, including AI applications in consultancy. The findings of
W
this study using the Gioia Methodology are presented in the present paper, which offers a
IE
comprehensive analysis of how AI is shaping up in management consultancy.
3.4.1. Sample selection
EV
This study selected a set of interviewees who could capture the impact of AI on consulting. In
line with Patton's (1990) suggestion to choose a heterogeneous sample of participants,
professionals from AI Strategy Consulting, Strategy Consulting, Management Consulting,
PR
Pricing Consulting, M&A Consulting, and Foresight Consulting were selected. Figure 1
Appendix shows how the interviews were conducted targeting junior and senior executives to
explore the impact of AI across the organization. The individual semi-structured interviews
provided an opportunity to go into depth about personal experiences and opinions; thus, this
approach could better explore the nature of the topic. For example, Guinan et al. (2019) show
that they could measure the effects of digital disruption on consulting (Guinan et al., 2019). This
paper uses the recommendations of Marshall et al. (2013) regarding the selection of interview
partners so that it collects data up to reaching data saturation.
11
Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.