LIBRO Asterious Applied Econometrics 387 392
LIBRO Asterious Applied Econometrics 387 392
A straightforward generalization of the above definition can be made for the case of n
variables, as follows:
Definition 2 If Zt denotes an n×1 vector of series Z1t , Z 2t , Z3t , . . . , Znt and (a) each
Zit is I(d); and (b) there exists an n × 1 vector β such that Zt β ∼
I(d − b), then Zt˜CI(d, b).
For empirical econometrics, the most interesting case is where the series transformed
with the use of the cointegrating vector become stationary; that is, when d = b, and the
cointegrating coefficients can be identified as parameters in the long-run relationship
between the variables. The next sections of this chapter will deal with these cases.
Yt = β1 + β2 Xt + ut (17.6)
In this case, the regression model may give us correct estimates of the â1 and â2 parame-
ters and the spurious equation problem has been resolved. However, what we have from
Equation (17.7) is only the short-run relationship between the two variables. Remember
that, in the long-run relationship:
Yt∗ = β1 + β2 Xt (17.8)
so Yt is bound to give us no information about the long-run behaviour of our model.
Knowing that economists are interested mainly in long-run relationships, this consti-
tutes a big problem, and the concept of cointegration and the ECM are very useful to
resolve this.
Cointegration and Error-Correction Models 359
Cointegration (again)
We noted earlier that Yt and Xt are both I(1). In the special case that there is a linear
combination of Yt and Xt (that is, I(0)), then Yt and Xt are cointegrated. Thus, if this
is the case, the regression of Equation (17.6) is no longer spurious, and it also provides
us with the linear combination:
which will now have the advantage of including both long-run and short-run infor-
mation. In this model, b1 is the impact multiplier (the short-run effect) that measures
the immediate impact a change in Xt will have on a change in Yt . On the other hand,
π is the feedback effect, or the adjustment effect, and shows how much of the dise-
quilibrium is being corrected – that is the extent to which any disequilibrium in the
previous period affects any adjustment in Yt . Of course ût−1 = Yt−1 − β̂1 − β̂2 Xt−1 , and
therefore from this equation β2 is also the long-run response (note that it is estimated
by Equation (17.7)).
Equation (17.10) now emphasizes the basic approach of the cointegration and
error-correction models. The spurious regression problem arises because we are using
non-stationary data, but in Equation (17.10) everything is stationary, the change in
X and Y is stationary because they are assumed to be I(1) variables, and the residual
from the levels regression (17.9) is also stationary, by the assumption of cointegration.
So Equation (17.10) fully conforms to our set of assumptions about the classic linear
regression model and OLS should perform well.
3 A third, very important, advantage of ECMs is the ease with which they can fit into
the general to specific approach to econometric modelling, which is in fact a search
for the most parsimonious ECM model that best fits the given data sets.
4 Finally, the fourth and most important feature of the ECM comes from the fact that
the disequilibrium error term is a stationary variable (by definition of cointegration).
Because of this, the ECM has important implications: the fact that the two variables
are cointegrated implies that there is some adjustment process preventing the errors
in the long-run relationship from becoming larger and larger.
We can then derive the ECM, which is a reparametrization of the original Equation
(17.11) model:
and by rearranging and cancelling out terms that are added and subtracted at the
same time we get:
Yt = a0 + a1 Yt −1 + γ0 Xt + γ1 Xt −1 + ut (17.20)
What is of importance here is that when the two variables Y and X are cointegrated,
the ECM incorporates not only short-run but also long-run effects. This is because the
long-run equilibrium Yt−1 − β0 − β1 Xt−1 is included in the model together with the
short-run dynamics captured by the differenced term. Another important advantage is
that all the terms in the ECM model are stationary, and standard OLS is therefore valid.
This is because if Y and X are I(1), then Y and X are I(0), and by definition if Y and
X are cointegrated then their linear combination (Yt−1 − β0 − β1 Xt−1 ) ∼ I(0).
A final, very important, point is that the coefficient π = (1 − a1 ) provides us with
information about the speed of adjustment in cases of disequilibrium. To understand
this better, consider the long-run condition. When equilibrium holds, then (Yt−1 −
β0 − β1 Xt−1 ) = 0. However, during periods of disequilibrium, this term will no longer
be zero and measures the distance the system is away from equilibrium. For example,
suppose that because of a series of negative shocks in the economy (captured by the
error term ut ) Yt increases less rapidly than is consistent with Equation (17.14). This
causes (Yt−1 − β0 − β1 Xt−1 ) to be negative, because Yt−1 has moved below its long-run
steady-state growth path. However, since π = (1 − a1 ) is positive (and because of the
minus sign in front of π) the overall effect is to boost Yt back towards its long-run path
as determined by Xt in Equation (17.14). The speed of this adjustment to equilibrium
is dependent on the magnitude of (1 − a1 ). The magnitude of π will be discussed in the
next section.
362 Time Series Econometrics
n
m
Yt = µ + ai Yt−i + γi Xt−i + ut (17.21)
i=1 i=0
We want to obtain a long-run solution of the model, which would be defined as the
point where Yt and Xt settle down to constant steady-state levels Y ∗ and X ∗ , or more
simply when:
Y ∗ = β0 + β1 X ∗ (17.23)
X ∗ = Xt = Xt−1 = · · · = Xt−m
So, putting this condition into Equation (17.21), we get the long-run solution, as:
µ γ
Y∗ = + i X ∗
1− ai 1 − ai
µ (γ1 + γ2 + · · · + γm ) ∗
Y∗ = + X (17.24)
1 − a1 − a2 − · · · − an 1 − a1 − a2 − · · · − an
or:
Y ∗ = B0 + B1 X ∗ (17.25)
Y ∗ = B0 + B1 Xt (17.26)
Here there is an obvious link to the discussion of cointegration in the previous section.
Defining et as the equilibrium error as in Equation (17.4), we get:
et ≡ Yt − Y ∗ = Yt − B0 − B1 Xt (17.27)
n−1
m−1
Yt = µ + ai Yt−i + γi Xt−i + θ1 Yt−1 + θ2 Xt−1 + ut (17.28)
i=1 i=0
Cointegration and Error-Correction Models 363
Note: for n = 1 the second term on the left-hand side of Equation (17.28) disappears.
From this equation we can see, with a bit of mathematics, that:
m
θ2 = γi (17.29)
i=1
n−1
m−1
1 θ
Yt = µ + ai Yt−i + γi Xt−i + θ1 Yt−1 − − 2 Xt−1 + ut (17.31)
θ1 θ1
i=1 i=0
n−1
m−1
Yt = µ + ai Yt−i + γi Xt−i − θ1 (Yt−1 − β̂0 − β̂1 xt−1 ) + ut (17.32)
i=1 i=0
where θ1 = 0. Furthermore, knowing that Yt−1 − β̂0 − β̂1 xt−1 = et , our equilibrium
error, we can rewrite Equation (17.31) as:
n−1
m−1
Yt = µ + ai Yt−i + γi Xt−i − π êt−1 + εt (17.33)
i=1 i=0
(a) If π = 1 then 100% of the adjustment takes place within a given period, or the
adjustment is instantaneous and full.
(b) If π = 0.5 then 50% of the adjustment takes place in each period.
(c) If π = 0 then there is no adjustment, and to claim that Yt∗ is the long-run part of
Yt no longer makes sense.