Scribd
Upload
10 views5 pages

Peer Evaluation

The document outlines a peer evaluation process for faculty at Sree Narayana Guru College of Engineering and Technology, consisting of three forms to be filled out before, during, and after a teaching observation. The first form is for pre-observation details, the second captures the observer's comments on the session, and the third is for post-observation reflection with the Head of Department. Overall, the observed faculty received positive feedback for their effective teaching methods and communication with students.

Uploaded by

hod.ee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views5 pages

Peer Evaluation

The document outlines a peer evaluation process for faculty at Sree Narayana Guru College of Engineering and Technology, consisting of three forms to be filled out before, during, and after a teaching observation. The first form is for pre-observation details, the second captures the observer's comments on the session, and the third is for post-observation reflection with the Head of Department. Overall, the observed faculty received positive feedback for their effective teaching methods and communication with students.

Uploaded by

hod.ee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

SREE NARAYANA GURU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

AND TECHNOLOGY PAYYANUR


PEER EVALUATION FORM

FORM 1
[TO BE FILLED BY THE OBSERVER AND THE OBSERVEE AFTER DISCUSSION]

PEER SUPPORT FOR LEARNING & TEACHING THROUGH

OBSERVATION PART 1: PRE-OBSERVATION MEETING

The faculty being observed should complete this form in preparation for a short meeting
with their peer observation group / observer prior to the session to be observed.

Peer Observation Group:

1. Name & Department –

2. Name & Department ………………………………………………………………

Details of Teaching / Learning Session to be observed:

Observed: Observer:

Day/ Date / Time: ………………………… Group / Location:

Session / Duration: ………………………… No of Students: ………………

Topic / Title of Session:

What are the objectives for the session (both for you and for the students)?
What would you like feedback on? (e.g. use of visual aids / the white board, your
voice, interaction with the students, pace, use of examples, use of new techniques
etc.)

Black board and Power point Presentation

Are there any factors which the observer needs to be aware of? (e.g. problems
relating to the group or individual students, you are trying out something new
etc.)

No such Problems
FORM 2
[TO BE FILLED BY THE OBSERVER AND THE OBSERVEE AFTER THE OBSERVATION IS
DONE]
PEER SUPPORT FOR LEARNING & TEACHING THROUGH
OBSERVATION PART 2: OBSERVER’S COMMENTS
The observer should complete this form during / following the observation (in preparation
for meeting with the lecturer and giving feedback).

 Observed positive things about the lecture:

His explanation was clear and maintained good communication with students
asking them quizzes in between the lecturer ,also students where much
enthusiastic in learning

 Things that could have be improved in future:

No such things noticed

 Any other Comments / suggestions:


No
FORM3
[TO BE FILLED BY THE HOD BASED ON THE COMMENTS FROM THE OBSERVER]

PEER SUPPORT FOR LEARNING & TEACHING THROUGH OBSERVATION

PART 3: POST OBSERVATION MEETING - REFLECTION & DISCUSSION with HOD

This form should be completed and signed by both the observer and the HoD following
discussion of Part 2. (Observer should not disclose the matter that are confidential with the
observed and the observer as discussed in Form 2)

Date / Time / Location of meeting: 18/05/2022- 11am-Hod

chamber The comments on the following have been mentioned here:

 The comments noted in Part 2 (Observer’s comments).


 Feedback or good practice that could be shared with others.
 Possible ways that things could be developed & improved.
 The peer observation process.
 Proposals for future staff development.

Comments of HoD: it was came to know that the faculty delivered lecturer effectively and
efficiently to the students

Signature – Observer: ………………………………………………………………

Signature – Observed: ……..………………………………………………………..

Note: Copies of Part 1 and Part 3 should be passed to the HoD. Part 2 is confidential and
can be retained by the faculty.
HoD

You might also like