Slide Ch 11s
Slide Ch 11s
1 / 33
Macaulay and Modified Durations II
Definition
For a given cash flow {(ak , tk ) : k ∈ N}, the Macaulay duration is
defined by P ak P ak
k tk (1+i)tk k tk (1+i)tk
dmac = P ak =
k (1+i)tk p(i)
and the modified duration is defined by
P ak
−p ′ (i) k tk (1+i)tk +1
dmod = = .
p(i) p(i)
Clearly
dmac
dmod = .
1+i
2 / 33
Macaulay and Modified Durations III
From the definition we can see that if there are two cash flows
A = {(tk , ak )} and B = {(tk , bk )}, then the Macaulay duration of
the cash flow A + B satisfies
P ak +bk
k tk (1+i)tk
dmac,A+B =
pA (i) + pB (i)
P ak P bk
k tk (1+i)tk k tk (1+i)tk
pA (i) pA (i) + pB (i) pB (i)
=
pA (i) + pB (i)
pA (i)dmac,A + pB (i)dmac,B
=
pA (i) + pB (i)
3 / 33
Macaulay and Modified Durations IV
So we have
pA (i)dmac,A + pB (i)dmac,B
dmac,A+B = .
pA (i) + pB (i)
4 / 33
Macaulay and Modified Durations V
Definition
For a given cash flow {(ak , tk ) : k ∈ N}, the Macaulay convexity
is defined by P 2 ak
k tk (1+i)tk
cmac (i) = .
p(i)
and the modified convexity is defined by
P ak
p ′′ (i) k tk (tk + 1) (1+i)tk +2
cmod (i) = = .
p(i) p(i)
5 / 33
Macaulay and Modified Durations VI
6 / 33
Macaulay and Modified Durations VII
7 / 33
Macaulay and Modified Durations VIII
8 / 33
First Order Macaulay and Modified Approximations I
9 / 33
First Order Macaulay and Modified Approximations II
and
∂c X
lim (i, t) = lim ak (t − tk )(1 + i)t−tk −1 > 0,
t→∞ ∂i t→∞
k
10 / 33
First Order Macaulay and Modified Approximations III
∂c
there exists a T > 0 such that ∂i (i, T ) = 0. Let
∂c
(i, T ) = T (1 + i)T −1 p(i) + (1 + i)T p ′ (i) = 0.
∂i
Then
p ′ (i)
T (i) = −(1 + i) = (1 + i)dmod (i) = dmac (i).
p(i)
12 / 33
First Order Macaulay and Modified Approximations V
13 / 33
First Order Macaulay and Modified Approximations VI
14 / 33
First Order Macaulay and Modified Approximations VII
15 / 33
Cash-flow Matching I
16 / 33
Cash-flow Matching II
17 / 33
Cash-flow Matching III
18 / 33
Redington Immunization I
p(i) = 0
20 / 33
Redington Immunization III
21 / 33
Redington Immunization IV
Redington Immunization
Let {(Lj , tj ) : j = 1, . . . , n} be the liabilities. The Redington
immunization strategy is to arrange the assets providing cash
inflows {(Ak , sk ) : k = 1, . . . , m} so that:
1) A1 v s1 + · · · + Am v sm = L1 v t1 + · · · + Ln v tn ,
2) s1 A1 v s1 + · · · + sm Am v sm = t1 L1 v t1 + · · · + tn Ln v tn , or the
durations (either Macaulay or modified) of the assets and
liabilities are equal.
2 A v sm > t 2 L v t1 + · · · + t 2 L v tn , or the
3) s12 A1 v s1 + · · · + sm m 1 1 n n
convexity of the assets is greater than the convexity of the
liabilities,
1
where v = 1+i0 is the current discount factor.
22 / 33
Redington Immunization V
23 / 33
Redington Immunization VI
24 / 33
Redington Immunization VII
25 / 33
Full Immunization I
26 / 33
Full Immunization II
1) p(i0 ) = 0, i.e.,
2) p ′ (i0 ) = 0, i.e.,
or
aA(1 + i0 )a − bB(1 + i0 )−b = 0
27 / 33
Full Immunization III
Full Immunization
Let L be a liability at the time t. The full immunization strategy is
to arrange the assets providing cash inflows A and B at the times
t − a and t + b, a, b > 0, respectively, so that:
1) Au a + Bu −b = L,
2) aAu a − bBu −b = 0, where u = 1 + i0 is the current
accumulation factor.
28 / 33
Full Immunization IV
To see that the full immunization achieves the desired result, let’s
re-write p(i) as
30 / 33
Full Immunization VI
Since
a 1+i
p(i) = A(1 + i0 ) f
1 + i0
we have
p(i0 ) = 0 and p(i) > 0 for all i ̸= i0 .
31 / 33
Full Immunization VII
32 / 33
Full Immunization VIII
33 / 33