Name of Employee:

Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE
per KRA
Outstanding Very Satisfactory
5 4

Learning outcomes across learning areas collected ,

Learning outcomes across learning areas collected , analyzed , and
analyzed , and utilized as basis for at least 1
Quality utilized as basis for at least 1 intervention/ research /CI Project
intervention/ research /CI Project /innovation
/innovation applied to address learning gap
Instructional Accounted and utilized completed to address learning gap
Leadership (30%) learning outcomes viz-a-viz
goals and targets across
learning areas for analysis
to address identified
learning gaps
at least 75% NAT-MPS (for sample schools)
Efficiency 81-99% of learners have a GPA of 75%-above
100% of learners achieved GPA of 75%-above

Grade sheets evaluated 3 weeks after the

Timeliness Grade sheets evaluated 2 weeks after the assessment
assessment

Performed the ff. tasks with evidences: a. Recommended localized

curriculum (mother tongue based) for instruction b. Developed
standards for outstanding teacher and pupil performance
c. Organized appopriate class programs, ADM, flexible learning
options as stop-gap measures d. Consolidated reports on learning
difficulties, home visitations and peculiar incidents used for planning
Quality and implementing apppropriate interventions at least 3 indicators are present

Performed instructional
supervision to
achieve learning outcomes

Observed 91% - 99% of the total number of teachers

Efficiency Observed 100% of the teachers at least 4 times a year
at least 4 times a year

Performed instructional supervision one day after

Timeliness Performed instructional supervision on the set schedule
planned schedule.

100% of teachersl needing TA in identified areas such as classroom 91%- 99% of teachers needing TA in identified areas
management, ,instructional competence, learning assessment (authentic ( classroom management, ,instructional competence,
Quality assessment), learning resource management, and action research given learning assessment, learning resource management, and
assistance action research) given assistance
Provided technical
assistance and guided
teachers on the efffective
instructional practices to
improve student learning
 Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE
per KRA
Provided technical Outstanding Very Satisfactory
assistance and guided 5 4
teachers on the efffective
instructional practices to
improve student learning 96-99% targets inTA Plan and Instructional
Efficiency 100% targets in TA Plan and Instructional Supervisory Plan achieved
Supervisory Plan achieved

Provided technical assistance 2 days before the planned schedule. Provided technical assistance one day before the
Timeliness planned schedule.

100% implementation of the ff. DEPED issuances /guidelines/Learner-

support programs with evidences : 1.Child-Friendly School 96-99% implementation of the ff. DEPED
System/standards 2. Child protection Policy /mechanisms and issuances /guidelines/programs : 1.Child-Friendly
Learning
Environment (20%) Quality processes 3.DRRM mobilization4. NDEP 5.OK sa DepED 6. Solid School System 2. Child protection Policy 3.DRRM 4.
Waste Management 7. Youth Formation Development Program 8. NDEP 5.OK sa DepED 6. Solid Waste Management
Learning Resources and facilities based on 21st century standards
Provided safe and child
friendly learning
environment for
students/learners

Efficiency School with zero accident reported School with 1 accident reported

Program Implementation Reports submitted 2 days before the Program Implementation Reports submitted 1 day
Timeliness deadline before the deadline

At least 1 school policy on student discipline formulated, At least 1 school policy on student discipline
Quality enacted,implemented, monitored and evaluated involving all formulated, enacted,implemented, and monitored
stakeholders involving all stakeholders

Implemented policy on Efficiency 100% complaints (on bullying etc.) resolved acted upon 91-99% complaints (on bullying etc.) acted upon
student discipline
formulated by the school
with all the stakeholders to
promote student
engagement and growth

Planned diffrentiated activities to address /support

Planned diffrentiated activities to address /support learners' multiple
Timeliness learners' multiple intelligences/preferences 2 days
intelligences/preferences conducted on set schedule
after the set schedule

Multi-hazard ocntingency plan formulated,

Multi-hazard contingency plan formulated, enacted,implemented,
Quality enacted,implemented, and monitored involving all
monitored, and evaluated involving all stakeholders
stakeholders

Ensured school safety,

 Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE
per KRA
Outstanding Very Satisfactory
5 4

Observed the 8 components of WinS:

1. Oral hygiene and proper handwashing;
Ensured school safety, 2.Provision of safe and adequate water supply;
disaster preparedness 3.Provision of toilet, handwashing, and drainage facilities;
and resiliency for 4.Environmental sanitation (including the elimination of breeding grounds
Observed the 6-7 components of WinS
learning continuity at all Efficiency for mosquitoes that carry the dengue virus) and solid waste management;
times 5.Food sanitation;
6.Menstrual Hygiene Management;
7.Deworming; and
8..Hygiene and sanitation education

Uploading of WinS Self- Assessment in the Online

Uploading of WinS Self- Assessment in the Online Monitoring System
Timeliness Monitoring System (OMS) 3 days before the set
(OMS) 1 week before the set schedule
schedule

ESIP is crafted based on the ff.guiding principles:

1.ESIP is anchored on DepeD vision, mission ad core values.
School 2.ESIP is evidence and results-based.
Leadership, 3.ESIP is learner-centered.
absence of 1 indicator
Management, and Quality 4 ESIP is the. result of innovative and systems-thinking
Operations (20%) 5. ESIP is deveoped based on CI methodology
Developed and 6.ESIP is formulated with the active participation of all education
implemented the new stakeholders.
cycle of ESIP including THE
School BE-LRCP (Basic
Education Learning
Recovery and Continuity
Plan) for SY 2022-2023
100% of the school targets in AIP Year 1 & BE-LRCP achieved (with 80-99% of the school targets in AIP Year 1 & BE-LRCP
Efficiency evidence contained in school report card) achieved

ESIP/AIP & BE-LRCP submitted two 2 days before deadline ESIP & BE-LRCP submitted one day before deadline

Timeliness

AIP,PPMP, APP submitted 2 days before August 1 st week submitted 1 day1 before August 1st week

Financial report prepared, reviewed, signed,submitted, posted in Financial report prepared, reviewed, signed, submitted,
Quality transparency board and updated quarterly and posted in transparency board

Managed and utilized 100% of downloaded funds utilized and liquidated monthly 91-99% of downloaded funds utilized and
school MOOE based on Efficiency
approved plan (IUs)/ Quarterly (Non-IUs) liquidated monthly (IUs)/ Quarterly (Non-IUs)
 Performance Indicators
Managed and utilized Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES
school MOOE based on TIME LINE
per KRA
approved plan
Outstanding Very Satisfactory
5 4

Liquidation report submitted (for Non-IUs)/ URS updated (for Ius) 2 Liquidation report submitted 1 day before the
Timeliness days before the deadline deadline

Inputs in LIS, BEIS, NSBI are 100% accurate, reliable and without Inputs in LIS, BEIS, NSBI are 100% accurate, reliable
Quality errors. and with 1 error.

Managed web-based school

data on learning resources
and physical facilities as Communicated results of SMEA to 100% of the external stakeholders Communicated results of SMEA to 96-99% of the
relevant inputs to school Efficiency quarterly external stakeholders quarterly
planning and generation of
support from stakeholders

SMEA results and School Report Card are submitted two 2 days SMEA results and School Report Card are submitted
Timeliness before deadline one day before deadline

Human Resource
Management
Development (15%) . Quality School is 100% compliant to the standards based on Training Needs School is 91-99% compliant to the standards based
Assessment (TNA) on Training Needs Assessment (TNA)

Managed the learning and

development program of
the school to improve 100% of non-teaching Personel , and teaching personnel with 91-99% of non-teaching Personel , and teaching
performance of the school Efficiency prioritized needs indicated in respective Individual Development personnel with prioritized needs indicated in
personnel Plans Trained respective Individual Development Plans Trained

School Professional Development Plan (SPPD) submitted 2 days School Professional Development Plan (SPPD)
Timeliness before the deadline submitted 1 day before the deadline
 Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE
per KRA
Outstanding Very Satisfactory
5 4

School LAC is consistent withonly 6 of the following

areas of discussion: 1. Learner Diversity and Student
School LAC is consistent with the following areas of discussion: 1. Learner
Inclusion 2. Content and Pedagogy of the K to 12 Basic
Diversity and Student Inclusion 2. Content and Pedagogy of the K to 12
Education Program 3.Assessment and Reporting in the K
Basic Education Program 3.Assessment and Reporting in the K to 12 Basic
to 12 Basic Education Program 4. 21st Century Skills and
Quality Education Program 4. 21st Century Skills and ICT Integration in Instruction
ICT Integration in Instruction and Assessment 5.
and Assessment 5. Curriculum Contextualization, Localization, and
Curriculum Contextualization, Localization, and
Indigenization 6. How community linkages can support the curriculum 7.
Indigenization 6. How community linkages can support
Emerging and urgent issues or concerns affecting teaching and learning
the curriculum 7. Emerging and urgent issues or concerns
Led and guided the conduct affecting teaching and learning
of School Learning Action
Cells (SLACs) based on
approved School LAC plan.

100% of planned SLACs/INSETbased on the School LAC Plan 91-99% of planned SLACs/INSETbased on the School
Efficiency conducted LAC Plan conducted

Timeliness School LAC Plan submitted 2 days before the deadline School LAC Plan submitted 1 day before the deadline

91-99% of teachers provided with technical

Provided technical 100% of teachers provided with technical assistance with assistance with corresponding evidences: teacher
assistance to teachers on corresponding evidences: teacher portfolio containing observation portfolio containing observation reports LDNA
matters pertaining to reports LDNA results, performance analysis and recommendations for results, performance analysis and recommendations
enhancement of development interventions, performance contracts, and for development interventions, performance
classroom management, performance evaluation results in prescribed tools contracts, and performance evaluation results in
skills and instructional Quality prescribed tools
competence and to non-
teaching personnel for
support services within
the RPMS cycle
 Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE
per KRA
Outstanding Very Satisfactory
5 4

Efficiency 100% of teachers rated at least Very Satisfactory

91-99% of teachers rated Very Satisfactory

Conducted the 4 RPMS phases3 days behind the

Conducted the 4 RPMS phases on schedule with school personnel
schedule with school personnel supported with the
supported with the following as evidences:performance contracts, and
Timeliness following as evidences:performance contracts, and
performance evaluation results in prescribed tools and proposed
performance evaluation results in prescribed tools and
development plans
proposed development plans

100% participation of the identified parents and other stakeholders in the 96-99% participation of the identified parents and other
PARENTS Quality PAPs planning, implementation, monitoring, evaluation , feedbak-giving , stakeholders in the PAPs planning, implementation,
LEADERSHIP and validation monitoring, evaluation , feedbak-giving , and validation
& COMMUNITY Engaged parents, SGC, and
PARTNERSHIP the school community in
the improvement and
(15%) accreditation of the school
and implementation of
PAPs for continuous
improvement
Efficiency Elevated to a higher SBM level of practice Validated by the Regional Office for SBM Level of Practice

GPTA assembly and other organized programs with

GPTA assembly and other organized programs with stakeholders, esp. for
stakeholders, esp. for academic and other purposes (esp.
Timeliness academic and other purposes (esp. Strategic planning) conducted on set
Strategic planning)conducted 1 day after the set
schedule
schedule
 Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE
per KRA
Outstanding Very Satisfactory
5 4

Stakeholders partnership and mobilization plan prepared,

Stakeholders partnership and mobilization plan prepared, reviewed, signed,
reviewed, signed, implemented, and monitored
Quality implemented, monitored, and evaluuated quarterly
quarterly (complete with reports and documentations of
(complete with reports and documentations of meetings, agreements)
meetings, agreements)

Established school and at least ___ MOUs/MOAs signed for the obtained
___ MOUs/MOAs signed for the obtained resources for the school through
family and Efficiency resources for the school through stakeholders
stakeholders partnership
community partnership for partnership
school performance

Recognition of stakeholders conducted quarterly 1 day

•- Timeliness Recognition of stakeholders conducted aon set schedule
after the set schedule

at least ____ potential donors explored to address school

Quality at least ____ potential donors explored to address school gap
gap
Accepted donations,
gifts, bequests, grants ,
and any form of supprot
from stakeholders to
enhance teachers' at least ____ turn-over ceremonies conducted
Efficiency at least __ turn-over ceremonies conducted /launched
competencies, provide /launched
instructional materials
and equipment, and
improve physical facilities

Timeliness DPDS updated every end of the month DPDS updated 2 days after the end of the month
 Name of Rater:
Position:

G TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating Score

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Learning outcomes across learning

areas collected , analyzed , and
Learning outcomes across learning areas collected ,
utilized as basis for at least 1 Learning outcomes across learning areas
analyzed ,and utilized as basis for at least 1 intervention/
intervention/research /CI Project collected , and analyzed
research /CI Project /innovation developed
/innovation conceptualized/proposed
to address learning gap

61-79% of learners have a GPA of 51-69% of learners have a GPA of 75%-

71-89% of learners have a GPA of 75%-above
75%-above above

Grade sheets evaluated 6 weeks after

Grade sheets evaluated 4 weeks after the assessment Grade sheets evaluated 5 weeks after
the assessment
the assessment

at least 2 indicators are present at least 1 indicator is present none of the given indicators is present

Observed 81-90% of the total number of teachers at least Observed 71-80 of the total number Observed 61-70% a of the total number
4 times a year of teachers at least 4 times a year of teachers at least 4 times a year

Performed instructional supervision two days after the Performed instructional supervision 3
Performed instructional supervision 4
planned schedule days after planned schedule.
days after the planned schedule

71-80 % of teachers needing TA in 61-70% of teachers needing TA in identified

81-90% of teachers needing TA in identified areas identified areas ( classroom areas ( classroom
( classroom management, ,instructional competence, learning management, ,instructional competence, management, ,instructional competence,
assessment, learning resource management, and action learning assessment, learning resource learning assessment, learning resource
research) given assistance management, and action research) given management, and action research) given
assistance assistance
Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating Score

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

3 2 1 Q E T Ave

86-90% targets in TA Plan and

81-85% targets in TA Plan and
91-95% targets in TA Plan achieved Instructional Supervisory
Instructional Supervisory Planachieved
Planachieved

Provided technical assistance as planned. Provided technical assistance one day after Provided technical assistance two days
planned schedule. after the planned schedule.

86-90% implementation of the ff.

DEPED issuances 81-85% implementation of the ff. DEPED
91-95% implementation of the ff. DEPED issuances
/guidelines/programs : 1.Child- issuances /guidelines/programs :
/guidelines/programs : 1.Child-Friendly School System 2.
Friendly School System 2. Child 1.Child-Friendly School System 2. Child
Child protection Policy 3.DRRM 4. NDEP 5.OK sa DepED 6.
protection Policy 3.DRRM 4. NDEP protection Policy 3.DRRM 4. NDEP 5.OK
Solid Waste Management
5.OK sa DepED 6. Solid Waste sa DepED 6. Solid Waste Management
Management

School with 2 accidents reported School with 3 accidents reported School with 4 accidents reported

Program Implementation Reports Program Implementation Reports

Program Implementation Reports submitted on time
submitted 1 day after the deadline submitted 2 days before the deadline

At least 1 school policy on student At least 1 school policy on student

At least 1 school policy on student discipline formulated,
discipline formulated, and enacted discipline formulated involving all
enacted, and implemented involving all stakeholders
involving all stakeholders stakeholders

71-80% complaints (on bullying etc.) 61-70% complaints (on bullying etc.) acted
81-90% complaints (on bullying etc.) acted upon
acted upon upon

Planned diffrentiated activities to Planned diffrentiated activities to

Planned diffrentiated activities to address /support
address /support learners' multiple address /support learners' multiple
learners' multiple intelligences/preferences 3 days after
intelligences/preferences 2 days after intelligences/preferences 1 day after the
the set schedule
the set schedule set schedule

Multi-hazard ocntingency plan

Multi-hazard ocntingency plan formulated, enacted, and Multi-hazard ocntingency plan
formulated, and enacted involving all
implemented involving all stakeholders formulated involving all stakeholders
stakeholders
Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating Score

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Observed the 4-5 components of WinS Observed the 2-3 components of WinS Observed only 1 component of WinS

Uploading of WinS Self- Assessment in Uploading of WinS Self- Assessment in

Uploading of WinS Self- Assessment in the Online
the Online Monitoring System (OMS) the Online Monitoring System (OMS) 1
Monitoring System (OMS) on the set schedule (November)
3 days after the set schedule week after the set schedule

absence of 2 indicators absence of 3 indicators absence of 4 indicators

60-79% of the school targets in AIP Year 1 & BE-LRCP 40-59% of the school targets in AIP 20-39% of the schol targets in AIP Year 1
achieved Year 1 & BE-LRCP achieved & BE-LRCP achieved

ESIP & BE-LRCP submitted one day ESIP & BE-LRCP submitted two days
ESIP & BE-LRCP submitted on time
after deadline after deadline

AIP,PPMP, APP submitted 1st week of August Submitted 1 day after set timeline Submitted 2 days after set timeline

Financial report prepared, reviewed, and

Financial report prepared, reviewed, signed and submitted Financial report prepared and reviewed
signed

71-80% of downloaded funds 61-70% of downloaded funds

81-90 % of downloaded funds utilized and
liquidated monthly (IUs)/ Quarterly (Non-IUs) utilized and liquidated monthly utilized and liquidated monthly
(IUs)/ Quarterly (Non-IUs) (IUs)/ Quarterly (Non-IUs)
Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating Score

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Liquidation report submitted 1 day Liquidation report submitted 2 days

Liquidation report submitted on time
after the deadline before the deadline

Inputs in LIS, BEIS, NSBI are 100% accurate, reliable and Inputs in LIS, BEIS, NSBI are 100% Inputs in LIS, BEIS, NSBI are 100%
with 2 errors. accurate, reliable and with 3 errors. accurate, reliable and with 4 errors.

Communicated results of SMEA to 86- Communicated results of SMEA to 81-

Communicated results of SMEA to 91-95% of the external
90% of the external stakeholders 85% of the external stakeholders
stakeholders quarterly
quarterly quarterly

SMEA results and School Report Card SMEA results and School Report Card
SMEA results and School Report Card submitted on time
are submitted one day after deadline are submitted two days after deadline

School is 71-80% compliant to the School is 100% compliant to the

School is 81-90 % compliant to the standards based on
standards based on Training Needs standards based on Training Needs
Training Needs Assessment (TNA)
Assessment (TNA) Assessment (TNA)

71-80% of non-teaching Personel ,

61-70% of non-teaching Personel , and
81-90% of non-teaching Personel , and teaching personnel and teaching personnel with
teaching personnel with prioritized
with prioritized needs indicated in respective Individual prioritized needs indicated in
needs indicated in respective Individual
Development Plans Trained respective Individual Development
Development Plans Trained
Plans Trained

School Professional Development Plan School Professional Development Plan

School Professional Development Plan (SPPD) submitted
(SPPD) submitted 1 day after the (SPPD) submitted 2 days before the
on time
deadline deadline
Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating Score

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

3 2 1 Q E T Ave

School LAC is consistent with the only 4

School LAC is consistent with only 3 of the
of the following areas of discussion: 1.
following areas of discussion: 1. Learner
Learner Diversity and Student Inclusion 2.
School LAC is with only 5 of the following areas of discussion: 1. Diversity and Student Inclusion 2. Content
Content and Pedagogy of the K to 12
Learner Diversity and Student Inclusion 2. Content and and Pedagogy of the K to 12 Basic Education
Basic Education Program 3.Assessment
Pedagogy of the K to 12 Basic Education Program 3.Assessment Program 3.Assessment and Reporting in the
and Reporting in the K to 12 Basic
and Reporting in the K to 12 Basic Education Program 4. 21st K to 12 Basic Education Program 4. 21st
Education Program 4. 21st Century Skills
Century Skills and ICT Integration in Instruction and Assessment Century Skills and ICT Integration in
and ICT Integration in Instruction and
5. Curriculum Contextualization, Localization, and Instruction and Assessment 5. Curriculum
Assessment 5. Curriculum
Indigenization 6. How community linkages can support the Contextualization, Localization, and
Contextualization, Localization, and
curriculum 7. Emerging and urgent issues or concerns affecting Indigenization 6. How community linkages
Indigenization 6. How community
teaching and learning can support the curriculum 7. Emerging and
linkages can support the curriculum 7.
urgent issues or concerns affecting teaching
Emerging and urgent issues or concerns
and learning
affecting teaching and learning

81-90% of planned SLACs/INSETbased on the School LAC 71-80% of planned SLACs/INSETbased 61-70% of planned SLACs/INSETbased
Plan conducted on the School LAC Plan conducted on the School LAC Plan conducted

School LAC Plan submitted 1 day after School LAC Plan submitted 2 days
School LAC Plan submitted on time
the deadline before the deadline

71-80% of teachers provided with

61-70% of teachers provided with
technical assistance with
technical assistance with corresponding
81-90% of teachers provided with technical assistance corresponding evidences: teacher
evidences: teacher portfolio containing
with corresponding evidences: teacher portfolio portfolio containing observation
observation reports LDNA results,
containing observation reports LDNA results, performance reports LDNA results, performance
performance analysis and
analysis and recommendations for development analysis and recommendations for
recommendations for development
interventions, performance contracts, and performance development interventions,
interventions, performance contracts,
evaluation results in prescribed tools performance contracts, and
and performance evaluation results in
performance evaluation results in
prescribed tools
prescribed tools
Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating Score

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

3 2 1 Q E T Ave

71-80% of teachers rated Very 61-70% of teachers rated Very

81-90 % of teachers rated Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory Satisfactory

Conducted the 4 RPMS phases 9 days Conducted the 4 RPMS phases 12 days
behind the schedule with school behind the schedule with school
Conducted the 4 RPMS phases 6 days behind the schedule with
personnel supported with the following personnelsupported with the following as
school personnel supported with the following as
as evidences:performance contracts, and evidences:performance contracts, and
evidences:performance contracts, and performance evaluation
performance evaluation results in performance evaluation results in
results in prescribed tools and proposed development plans
prescribed tools and proposed prescribed tools and proposed development
development plans plans

86-90% participation of the identified

81-85% participation of the identified
91-95% participation of the identified parents and other parents and other stakeholders in the
parents and other stakeholders in the PAPs
stakeholders in the PAPs planning, implementation, monitoring, PAPs planning, implementation,
planning, implementation, monitoring,
evaluation , feedbak-giving , and validation monitoring, evaluation , feedbak-giving ,
evaluation , feedbak-giving , and validation
and validation

Recommended by the SDO to the Regional Office for SBM Level Validated by the SDO for SBM Level of Recommended by the PSDS to the SDO for
of Practice validation Practice SBM Level of Practice validation

GPTA assembly and other organized GPTA assembly and other organized
GPTA assembly and other organized programs with programs with stakeholders, esp. for programs with stakeholders, esp. for
stakeholders, esp. for academic and other purposes (esp. academic and other purposes (esp. academic and other purposes (esp. Strategic
Strategic planning) conducted 2 days after the set schedule Strategic planning) conducted 3 days planning) conducted 4 days after the set
after the set schedule schedule
Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating Score

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Stakeholders partnership and

Stakeholders partnership and mobilization
Stakeholders partnership and mobilization plan prepared, mobilization plan prepared, reviewed,
plan prepared, and reviewed quarterly
reviewed, signed,and implemented quarterly (complete with and signed quarterly (complete with
(complete with reports and documentations
reports and documentations of meetings, agreements) reports and documentations of meetings,
of meetings, agreements)
agreements)

at least ___ MOUs/MOAs signed for the at least ___ MOUs/MOAs signed for the
at least ___ MOUs/MOAs signed for the obtained resources for
obtained resources for the school obtained resources for the school through
the school through stakeholders partnership
through stakeholders partnership stakeholders partnership

Recognition of stakeholders conducted quarterly 2 days after Recognition of stakeholders conducted Recognition of stakeholders conducted
the set schedule quarterly 3 days after the set schedule quarterly 4 days after the set schedule

at least ____ potential donors explored to at least ____ potential donors explored to
at least ____ potential donors explored to address school gap
address school gap address school gap

at least ___ turn-over ceremonies conducted /launched at least ____ turn-over ceremonies at least ____ turn-over ceremonies
conducted /launched conducted /launched

DPDS updated 6 days after the end of DPDS updated 8 days after the end of
DPDS updated 4 days after the end of the month
the month the month