ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN VALUES EDUCATION

Values education is an essential aspect of the education system that aims to instill a sense of
morality, ethics, and civic responsibility in students. Assessment tools in values education are
used to measure the effectiveness of this education and to identify areas for improvement. Here
are some of the commonly used assessment tools in values education:
Self-reflection: This is a simple and effective tool for assessing students' values education.
Students are asked to reflect on their actions and behaviors and identify areas where they have
demonstrated positive values and where they need to improve.
Observation: Teachers can observe students in the classroom, playground, and other settings
to assess their values education. Observations can help identify students who demonstrate
positive values such as kindness, empathy, and honesty, and those who need additional support
in these areas.
Surveys: Surveys can be used to assess students' attitudes, beliefs, and values. Surveys can
be used to measure the effectiveness of values education programs and identify areas where
students need additional support.
Interviews: Interviews can be used to gain insight into students' values education. Teachers can
conduct individual or group interviews to explore students' attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors.
Portfolios: Students can create portfolios that showcase their values education. These
portfolios can include written reflections, artwork, and other projects that demonstrate their
understanding and application of values.
Assessments: Formal assessments, such as multiple-choice tests or essays, can be used to
measure students' understanding of values education concepts.
A combination of assessment tools can provide a more comprehensive picture of students'
values education, which can inform instructional practices and improve the overall effectiveness
of values education programs.
Pre and post-tests: These are used to measure students' understanding of values education
concepts at the beginning and end of a unit or course.
Observation and interviews: These methods involve observing students' behavior and
attitudes in relation to values education concepts and conducting interviews to gather information
about their experiences.
Rubrics and checklists: These tools are used to evaluate students' performance on specific
tasks or assignments related to values education.
Portfolios: Students can create portfolios that showcase their learning and application of values
education concepts.
Surveys and questionnaires: These tools can be used to gather data on students' attitudes
and beliefs about values education.
Peer and self-assessments: These methods involve students assessing their own and their
peers' behavior and attitudes in relation to values education concepts.

Specific assessment tools in values education along with their pros and cons:
Ethical dilemma scenarios: This involves presenting students with ethical dilemmas and
asking them to identify the best course of action based on their values.
Pros: It allows students to practice decision-making and ethical reasoning.
Cons: It may not reflect real-life situations accurately, and students may provide responses that
do not reflect their actual behavior.
Role-playing exercises: Students are given a scenario and asked to act out a role-playing
exercise to demonstrate their understanding of values education concepts.
Pros: It is engaging and allows students to practice applying values education concepts.
Cons: It may not be suitable for all students, and some may feel uncomfortable or unwilling to
participate.
Value sorting cards: Students are given a set of cards with different values and asked to sort
them into categories based on their personal values.
Pros: It encourages self-reflection and can be a useful discussion starter.
Cons: It may not accurately reflect students' actual values, and students may struggle to
categorize values.
Peer and self-assessments: Students are asked to assess their own and their peers' behavior
and attitudes in relation to values education concepts.
Pros: It encourages self-reflection and peer feedback.
Cons: It may not provide accurate assessments, and students may be biased in their
assessments.
Reflective writing: Students are asked to write reflective essays or journals about their values
education experiences.
Pros: It allows for in-depth reflection and can help students articulate their values.
Cons: It may not be suitable for all students, and some may struggle with writing skills.
Projects and presentations: Students are asked to create projects or presentations that
demonstrate their understanding and application of values education concepts.
Pros: It allows for creativity and can be a more engaging assessment tool.
Cons: It may not accurately reflect students' understanding of values education concepts.
Different assessment tools have their advantages and disadvantages, and it is important to
choose the appropriate tool based on the learning objectives, student needs, and instructional
context. Combining different assessment tools can provide a more comprehensive assessment
of students' values education.

Assessment tools are crucial in values education for a variety of reasons:

Helps to measure learning outcomes: Assessment tools allow educators to measure
students' understanding of values education concepts and how they apply them in real-life
situations.
Provides feedback to students: Assessment tools provide students with feedback on their
progress and areas where they need to improve, helping them to develop self-awareness and
motivation to learn.
Guides instruction: Assessment tools provide teachers with valuable information that can
help guide their instruction and improve their teaching strategies.
Demonstrates accountability: Assessment tools help to demonstrate accountability and
transparency to stakeholders such as parents, administrators, and policymakers.
References:

Lovat, T., Clement, N., Dally, K., Toomey, R., Crotty, R., & Nielsen, W. (2010). International
research handbook on values education and student wellbeing. Springer.
Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (Eds.). (2008). Place-based education in the global age:
Local diversity. Routledge.
Nucci, L. P., Narvaez, D., & Krettenauer, T. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of moral and character
education. Routledge.
Ryan, K. (2010). A review of the literature on values education. Centre for Applied Educational
Research, University of Tasmania.
Schaps, E., & Lewis, C. (1999). How to assess your school's values education program.
Character Education Partnership.
Soutter, A. K. (2016). Values education in Australian schools: An exploration of teachers'
beliefs and practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 1-15.
Martin, J. R., & Johnson, D. R. (2016). Impact of Values Education on Student Achievement: A
Comprehensive Meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 322–339.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000087
Borovcnik, M., & Ferreira, M. P. (2015). Assessment of values education: Results of a
Portuguese study. Educational Research, 57(2), 168–182.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1025649
O’Connor, K. E., & Amos, A. (2019). Assessing character education: Tools and techniques.
International Journal of Education and Social Science Research, 9(1), 31–37.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijessr.2019.01005.14
Tucker, B. (2013). The role of the portfolio in assessing values learning outcomes. In D. G.
Creamer & A. Ylijoki (Eds.), Enhancing Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Engaging
with the Dimensions of Practice (pp. 177–190). Open University Press.
Darling, R. B., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2016). Empirically evaluating values-based assessment
in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 330–343.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116649711
Gray, E. M., & Ryan, J. J. (2017). Peer and self-assessment in values education: Effects on
ethical reasoning and behavior. Journal of Moral Education, 46(2), 131–143.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1303602
Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community Programs to Promote Youth
Development. National Academies Press (US).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK99456/
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems.
Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational
Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-
9068-5
Stiggins, R. J. (2007). Assessment through the student's eyes. Educational Leadership, 64(8),
22–26. https://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el200705_stiggins.pdf

DEVIN DUMLAO
MENTOR
TOP 4 | SEPT. 2021 LET | VAL ED
https://web.facebook.com/devindumlao