Light Metals 2024 The Minerals Metals Materials Society Tms Instant Download
Light Metals 2024 The Minerals Metals Materials Society Tms Instant Download
https://ebookbell.com/product/light-metals-2024-the-minerals-
metals-materials-society-tms-55955528
Light Metal Systems Part 1 Selected Systems From Agalcu To Alcuer 1st
Edition G Effenberg
https://ebookbell.com/product/light-metal-systems-part-1-selected-
systems-from-agalcu-to-alcuer-1st-edition-g-effenberg-4942848
https://ebookbell.com/product/light-metals-2021-50th-anniversary-
edition-linus-perander-46225286
https://ebookbell.com/product/light-metals-2023-stephan-broek-47740678
https://ebookbell.com/product/light-metals-2011-1st-edition-stephen-j-
lindsay-2410952
Light Metals 2018 1st Edition Olivier Martin
https://ebookbell.com/product/light-metals-2018-1st-edition-olivier-
martin-43057166
https://ebookbell.com/product/light-metals-2022-dmitry-eskin-43067116
https://ebookbell.com/product/light-metals-2012-carlos-suarez-4307294
https://ebookbell.com/product/light-metals-2013-barry-sadler-4307296
https://ebookbell.com/product/light-metals-2020-alan-tomsett-43686622
Edited by
SAMUEL WAGSTAFF
The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series
Samuel Wagstaff
Editor
123
Editor
Samuel Wagstaff
Oculatus Consulting
Marietta, GA, USA
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or
part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation,
broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter
developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not
imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and
regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed
to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty,
expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been
made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
affiliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
It is with great pleasure and honor that I present to you the Light Metals 2024 proceedings.
This collection of manuscripts serves as a time capsule for later researchers to not only see
how we approach technical problems but also what we value and esteem as an industry. The
challenges the industry faces today around energy efficiency and sustainability represent
difficult obstacles not unlike those faced by our forefathers previously. By contributing to
these proceedings, authors have committed themselves to advancing the collective whole
of the industry over any individual gain. The problems we face today are more than any one of
us can handle individually. The key does not lie in a single technological breakthrough,
derivation, or calculation. Instead, as we look at the exciting breakthroughs happening around
us today, we can see that it is through cross-industry collaboration that the greatest strides are
made. This is largely the magic of TMS. Each year we gather as an industry to discuss
contributions we have all made to making things better than they were the year before.
The Light Metals 2024 proceedings embody countless hours of work supplied by the
volunteer Symposium Organizers, Session Chairs, Reviewers, and TMS staff who labor
tirelessly to bring this tome into fruition each year. Of course, this collection of articles would
be empty without the contribution of the individual authors, whose work brings us together
this year. Special thanks and acknowledgment also go out to the symposium chairs of the five
technical symposia assembled for 2024. I would like to offer my personal thanks to Michael
Coley, Nabeel Aljallabi, Julien Lauzon-Gauthier, Anne Kvithyld, Tao Wang, Christopher
Hutchinson, Sazol Das, and Timothy Langan. Without their invaluable help, none of this
would have happened. The consistent guiding efforts of TMS staff have been integral as
always this year. Patricia Warren and Trudi Dunlap were there every step of the way making
sure that neither deadlines nor quality were allowed to slip.
There are exciting times ahead. With unprecedented expansion projects, bold sustainability
targets, and expanding markets, I cannot wait to see the new developments about to touch off.
I invite you all to read these proceedings with a spirit of growth and collaboration in your
heart. As you seek to create partnerships and discuss these proceedings with colleagues, I hope
we will continue to see great leaps in science and innovation.
Samuel Wagstaff
v
Contents
vii
viii Contents
xix
Program Organizers
xxi
xxii Program Organizers
Chairperson
Stephen Broek, Kensington Technology Inc., Ontario, Canada
Vice Chairperson
Samuel Wagstaff, Oculatus Consulting, Georgia, United States
Past Chairperson
Dmitry Eskin, Brunel University, Middlesex, United Kingdom
Secretary
Kristian Etienne Einarsrud, Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Trondheim,
Norway
JOM Advisor
Anne Kvithyld, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway
Light Metals Division Chair
Eddie McRae Williams, Arconic, Pennsylvania, United States
xxvii
xxviii Aluminum Committee 2023–2027
Desilication products
Solubility Bauxite
Bayer process Sodalite with the sodium hydroxide to form the sodium metasilicate
solution. Once sufficiently supersaturated, the silicates then
re-precipitate as insoluble sodium aluminosilicate
DSP. Based on the different types of X anions and solution
temperature, DSP could be hydroxysodalite, Cl-sodalite and
Introduction cancrinite [1, 5, 6]. While DSP is costly, it plays a beneficial
role in the Bayer process in terms of purifying the liquor of
Since the Bayer process was patented in 1888 by Australian impurities such as sulphate, carbonate, and chloride, and
chemist Karl Bayer, this technology has been the major therefore a certain amount of DSP is helpful to ensure a high
industrial process for the producing of alumina from bauxite degree of recyclability of the Bayer liquor.
ores [1, 2]. Even after 135 years, this process remains
unchanged for four major key sections: digestion of alumina- Reactive Silica Dissolution
rich minerals (gibbsite, boehmite, and diaspore) into hot
caustic solution, clarification of the insoluble phases (bauxite Al2 O3 2SiO2 2H2 O
þ 6NaOH
kaolinite
H. Peng (&) J. Vaughan S. Wang J. Vogrin D. Seneviratne , 2Na2 SiO3 þ 2NaAlO2 þ 5H2 O ð3Þ
School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland,
Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
e-mail: [email protected]
Dissolved Silica Precipitation uncertainty ±10.4 with 95% confidence level. The major
contribution in the uncertainties was due to the uncertainty in
6Na2 SiO3 þ 6NaAlO2 þ Na2 X þ 12H2 O the Gibbs energy of formation of the DSP phase. Later,
Moloy et al. [20] reported the formation and hydration
DT 3ðNa2 O Al2 O3 2SiO2 nH2 OÞNa2 X
, þ 12NaOH enthalpies of the hydroxysodalite family by hydrothermally
Bayer sodalite synthesising the material from a zeolite phase. More
ð4Þ recently, Zeng and Li [21] determined the solubility of so-
X = OH−, Cl−, SO42− and CO32−. dalite in NaOH-NaAl(OH)4 solutions at temperatures
The principles of Bayer desilication have been described between 30 and 75 °C by dissolving synthetic sodalite into
in many studies [7, 8]. Impurities in bauxite dissolve and solution. By data regression, they reported sodalite enthal-
accumulate in the Bayer circuit, contributing to an array of pies and Gibbs energies of formation at standard conditions.
process issues thus making it difficult to operate and control For cancrinite, Kurdakova et al. [22] estimated the thermo-
[9] with silicate phases being a primary contributor. Silicates dynamic properties of synthetic sodium carbonate cancrinite
such as kaolinite, halloysite, chamosite, and quartz exhibit at 27 °C using the reported thermodynamic data for calcium
different solubilities and reaction kinetics [1, 10]. Quartz cancrinite by Liu et al. [23] and Ogorodova et al. [24]. In this
typically does not significantly dissolve during the extraction section, the solid (synthesised under hydrothermal condi-
of alumina from bauxite, unless the grain structure is fine tions) is different from the phases that would be formed
and the digestion temperature and residence time are high. during the Bayer process. No reports have been identified
However, if quartz does dissolve it is especially costly as it that include the enthalpies and Gibbs energies of formation
leads to additional loss of dissolved aluminium. Halloysite is for sodalite and cancrinite at Bayer process conditions.
reactive but tends to be a minor component if present at all. Furthermore, there is no reliable report of the heat capacity–
Kaolinite is the most commonly found reactive silica and temperature relationship for the high-alumina, semi-
dissolves readily in caustic soda [5, 11, 12]. In the absence crystalline DSPs forming in the Bayer process.
of crystallization seed, most of the reactive silica forms
soluble sodium silicate which then precipitates as DSP
during the predesilication and digestion stages of the Bayer Empirical Solubility Models
process [13].
This review summarises the factors that influence ther- The equilibrium concentration of sodium aluminosilicate in
modynamics solubility and kinetic DSP crystallisation, and sodium aluminate solutions has been the subject of a number
mineral phase transformation during Bayer processes. The of studies. There is a considerable amount of evidence in
objective is to bring together the relevant fundamental literature to suggest that the desilication kinetics are directly
information about reaction equilibrium and kinetics to proportional to the liquor SiO2 supersaturation ratio.
enable the optimisation or improvement of predesilication Therefore, in order to optimise desilication it is important to
and digestion in terms of economic and environmental accurately predict equilibrium SiO2 values. The supersatu-
outcomes ration ratio is defined in Eq. 5 [25]:
silicate precipitation behaviour and accurate prediction of the A later study by Park and Englezos modelled silicate
products could enable novel, efficient methods of desilica- solubility from a chemical-thermodynamics perspective at
tion to be realised. Table 1 outlines the correlations for SiO2 conditions applicable to Kraft pulp mills. In their model, a
solubility in open literature and their range of applicability. slightly different precipitation reaction was used to give the
As these are empirical models, they have expressed the corresponding equilibrium constant in Eq. 7 [19]:
equilibrium concentration of silicate as [SiO2]eq.
a4H2 O ðm12
OH cOH Þ
12
K c ðT Þ ¼ ð7Þ
ðm8Na þ c8Na þ Þðm6AlðOHÞ c6AlðOHÞ Þðm6SiO2 c6SiO2 Þ
4 4 3 3
Thermodynamics Solubility Models
Although both models were reported to have good pre-
Outside of empirical correlations, only a few studies have dictions, they consistently predicted higher values than the
attempted to construct a silica solubility model from a measured data, especially at higher temperatures. When
thermodynamics perspective. The earliest thermodynamic- considering solubility from thermodynamic first principles,
based model found in literature was created by Jamialahmadi the equilibrium product Kp is dependent exactly on the
and Müller-Steinhagen [10]. They used the equilibrium nature of the chemical species. Given newly understood
constant for the precipitation reaction in Eq. 6 to provide a speciation, the equilibrium constant Kc can be written as
fit to experimental data. Eq. 8 which considers silicate species in terms of H2SiO42−
molality—the predominant silicon ion in Bayer process
½NaOH2 conditions [36]:
K c ðT Þ ¼ ð6Þ
½Na2 SiO3 ½NaAlO2 ½H2 O
12 12
a10
H2 O mOH cOH decrease in silicate solubility is inevitable as aluminate
K c ðT Þ ¼
m6Na þ c6Na þ m6H SiO2 c6H SiO2 m6AlðOHÞ c6AlðOHÞ mNa2 X cNa2 X concentration decreases [40]. As plant liquors typically do
2 4 2 4 4 4
not fall below 100 g/L Al2O3, the empirical correlations do
ð8Þ not parameterise a U-shaped curve and instead show only a
where a is the activity, m is the molality, and c is the activity positive relationship as shown in Fig. 2 Region III.
coefficient of the species. Problems arise when considering both Al and Si species
Considerable attention must be paid to speciation in in highly alkaline solution as neither Fig. 1 nor 2 adequately
Bayer liquors, especially at high ionic strength and temper- describe their co-existence. Pokrovski et al. were among the
ature. When considering Eq. 8 as the equilibrium constant first group to investigate Al-Si speciation in basic solutions
equation for DSP, good agreement has been observed with [41]. It found that the species AlSiO(OH)6− and its forma-
reported solubility values at extremely dilute conditions and tion through Eq. 9 accounted for at least 80% of the total
low temperature, however fails when increasing either of dissolved aluminium in the presence of silicate through 27Al
these conditions. Equally and perhaps more important to nuclear magnetic resonance measurements.
DSP modelling than the aluminium speciation is the speci-
H4 SiO04ðaqÞ þ AlðOHÞ
4 ðaqÞ $ AlSiOðOHÞ6 ðaqÞ þ H2 OðlÞ
ation of silicon. Problems associated with Si speciation
modelling can be traced back to its origins in geochemical ð9Þ
modelling [37]. It is generally accepted that the predominant
Gout et al. later conducted comprehensive Raman spec-
silicate species at high pH such as in the Bayer process is the
troscopic investigations on Al-Si complexation in ultrabasic
monomeric H2SiO42− although other polymeric and alumi-
solutions at 20 °C with higher OH− molality than previous
nosilicate species may exist. According to the speciation
studies [38]. Through measuring band intensities, they
diagram in Fig. 1, the H2SiO42− ion accounts for at least
derived the amounts of complexed Al and Si in solution
90% of the total silicate species in solution and is a gener-
shown in Fig. 3. The dimer species AlSiO3(OH)43− was
alised form of silicate ion shown in the equations as it is the
suggested to be the dominant complex formed through
dominant species [38, 39].
Eq. 10:
A systematic study undertaken by Smirnov [30] into
aluminate solutions that revealed three distinguishable 3
4 ðaqÞ þ AlðOHÞ4 ðaqÞ $ AlSiO3 ðOHÞ4 ðaqÞ þ H2 OðlÞ
H2 SiO2
regions in a characteristic ‘U’-shaped solubility curve as
shown in Fig. 2: (I) at low Al(OH)3 concentrations where a ð10Þ
decrease in the alumina concentration leads to a considerable Zeng and Li modelled silicate speciation using OLI’s
increase in solubility of DSP (higher SiO2); (II) an inter- mixed solvent electrolyte (MSE) [42] and the AlSiO3(OH)43−
mediate zone where the solubility is practically independent species proposed by Gout et al. [43]. Their model appeared to
of Al(OH)3 concentration; and (III) at high Al(OH)3 con- fit their low-temperature data well and suggested it to be the
centrations the equilibrium silica concentration increases predominant anion at Bayer conditions. However, even
with increasing alumina concentration. Note that at gibbsite sophisticated electrolyte solubility calculations such as that
precipitation conditions (3.3–3.8 M Al(OH)3), a sharp often do not always predict the unusually high Al and SiO2
Fig. 1 Distribution of solution silicate species in a 0.001 M Si solution at T = 25 °C a by Raman spectra [38]; b by geochemical modelling
software using IUPAC data (solid line) and HSC data (dashed line) [39]
Chemical Thermodynamics and Reaction Kinetics of Bayer Process Desilication 7
dm dm
¼ k d Að c c i Þ ¼ k r Að c i c Þ ! ¼ K G Aðc c Þg
dt dt
ð11Þ
The nucleation and crystal growth of DSP can be deter-
mined from the desilication rate and the supersaturation
order. Smith et al. proposed that the order of the reaction
(n) depends on the supersaturation ratio, with n equal to 1 at
lower ratios and 2 or 3 at higher ratios [34]. However, even
when the initial silicate concentration is the same, the seed
mass or surface area can also affect the order of the reaction.
Ruan et al. suggest that desilication with a third-order or
Fig. 3 Complexed Al and Si concentration as a function of the product
of concentrations of the free silicate and aluminate [38] greater dependence on Si supersaturation is due to nucle-
ation, either primary heterogeneous or secondary, while less
than third-order dependence is predominantly due to alu-
concentrations of Bayer liquors and nuclear waste tank con- minosilicate crystal growth [47, 48]. The nucleation and
centrates [44]. With the abundance of conflicting species, crystal growth rates of DSP during Bayer process vary with
further studies into the system at elevated temperature are kaolinite dissolution in caustic solutions [11, 12]. As shown
required for accurate modelling. in Fig. 4, kaolinite from bauxite completely dissolves into
The chemical-thermodynamic approach for estimating caustic solutions within hours, which is coupled with an
solubility can be a powerful predictive tool, provided the early increase of SiO2 concentration in the solutions. The
model is based on a complete and accurate data set. There is SiO2 concentration starts to decrease after complete disso-
limited data available for certain aqueous species such as lution of kaolinite due to precipitation of DSP which con-
aluminate-silicate polyanions and the heat capacity–tem- sumes the SiO2 component in the solution [49]. Nucleation
perature relationships have not been established for some and growth rate for DSP have historically been studied in
important components, including sodalite. Reliably relating terms of changes in silicate supersaturation, but not in terms
the thermodynamic predictions to practical solution phase of fundamental parameters. Furthermore, evidence of growth
concentrations requires an estimate of the activity coefficient rate dispersion and growth as a function of particle size has
for the aqueous species which is also currently lacking for not been investigated for DSP.
aqueous silicates. The systems are further complicated when The reactivity of kaolinite on the precipitation step to
considering the wide range of other solution components and form DSP has also been studied. Kotte states that experi-
ion substitutions in the DSP. ments have shown that kaolinite from most bauxites will
8 H. Peng et al.
dissolve rapidly (less than 15 min) provided the temperature dependent on temperature and conversion rates. This phase
is kept close to the atmospheric boiling point [49]. However, transformation sequence has received support from several
this is dependent on the particle size and kaolinite form research groups [1, 62, 63] and is regarded as the ‘correct’
present. Smith et al. similarly found that DSP precipitation phase transformation sequence in synthetic Bayer liquor.
rate is limited by the dissolution of kaolin [50]. Kaolinite can Radomirovic et al. [64] and Peng et al. [60] also observed
also be heat treated to form meta-kaolin, which reacts rapidly DSP formation beginning with an amorphous phase under
forming DSP phases seen under similar conditions using a Bayer conditions. In most of the studies investigating phase
soluble silicate source [11, 12, 51, 52]. transformation, a soluble silicate source such as sodium
metasilicate pentahydrate or waterglass was used. Some
studies have concluded that the starting silicate source
Desilication Products Phase Transformation influences the precipitating phase, implying that the true
phase transformation pathway originating from kaolin is still
The DSPs have much lower solubility than the kaolinite in unknown. It is suggested that DSP is initially heteroge-
Bayer liquor. Many researchers have investigated the neously nucleated on the kaolin and as kaolin further dis-
structure of DSP [6, 13, 50, 53–56]. Depending on the solves, these nuclei are released, allowing for secondary
solution chemistry and plant operating conditions, various nucleation. Vogrin et al. recently concluded that the DSP
types of DSP can be formed. The silicon-oxygen tetrahedron formed at alumina digestion concentrations directly precip-
is a basic structural element of most DSPs. Based on the itates as a high-alumina cancrinite-type structure that can
different types of anion incorporation and solution temper- remain stable at equilibrium [65]. This was the proposed
ature, the structure of DSP could be either that of a sodalite phase of DSP in bauxite residues compared to heat
(Na6(AlSiO4)6*2NaOH*2H2O) or cancrinite (Na6(Al- exchangers. Generally, in the Bayer liquor, truncated octa-
SiO4)6*Na2CO3*2H2O) [1, 5, 6] with molar soda to a sili- hedral cages (toc units) are formed by crosslinking AlO4 and
cate ratio (Na2O/SiO2) of 2/3. These two types of DSPs, on SiO4 tetrahedral blocks [66] and these are the fundamental
the other hand, are known to form as a result of a series of building blocks of the different DSP phases after kaolinite
solution-mediated silica-rich phase transformations (e.g., dissolution at temperature less than 100 °C [11, 67, 68].
kaolinite) [45, 57–59]. This sequence was explained by Peng
et al. in the context of thermodynamic driving forces and the
observed crystallization pathway occurs via the Ostwald Anion Effects on the Formation of DSPs
successive transformation step rule, which was proposed as
amorphous sodium aluminosilicate ! zeolite Linde Type A Anion impurities present in Bayer liquors are known to have
(LTA) ! sodalite ! cancrinite [39, 60, 61]. It suggests that a detrimental effect on the efficiency of the Bayer process.
Bayer process heat exchanger scale is in fact possibly made These anions originate from partial dissolution of sulphur- or
up of all phases including amorphous material, zeolite A, carbonate-containing minerals, organic material, process
sodalite, and cancrinite, but their proportions will be additives, as well as the diffusion of atmospheric carbon
Chemical Thermodynamics and Reaction Kinetics of Bayer Process Desilication 9
dioxide [69]. The presence of different anions can impact the sequence. For example, Seimiya et al. discovered DSP in
phase transformation rates [50, 52, 61, 70, 71] and trace bauxite residue transformed from zeolite A to sodalite after
amounts of impurities (*10–3 M) can cause significant desilication with the addition of NaCl, Na2CO3, and Na2SO4
effects on the crystal formation process. As Bayer liquor is [80]. Breuer et al. demonstrated that the addition of sodium
recirculated in the process there is a tendency for impurity salt such as sodium oxalate, carbonate, and sulphate pro-
levels to build up, reducing liquor productivity by affecting moted formation of cancrinite over sodalite at 200 °C [7].
alumina solubility, yield, liquor density, and viscosity [72]. However, other studies have found that specific salts might
As a result, they require purging to maintain reasonable inhibit the transformation of zeolite A to other phases [62].
steady-state concentration in the process. Although generally In summary, it is critical to understand the behaviour of each
considered undesirable, the precipitation of sodium alumi- anion influencing secondary nucleation rates, crystal growth,
nosilicate shows that various anions can become enclath- and agglomeration processes under Bayer DSP precipitation
rated within the framework, including Cl−, CO32−, SO42−, conditions.
etc. DSP is both paradoxically problematic and useful as the
inclusion can actually remove significant amounts of impu-
rities from Bayer liquors [73]. It has been reported that in- Conclusions and Outlook
clusions in DSP may account for up to 75% of Na2SO4
exiting the Bayer circuit, while chloride and carbonate are This review summarizes both chemical and physical prop-
seemingly lower at about 25% [72]. As anions are able to erties of DSPs and reviewed key issues relating to current
replace the hydroxide ion, the potential to reduce caustic challenges faced by the alumina industries for silica con-
losses by charging sodium salts after digestion has been tamination in the Bayer liquor, thermodynamics and solu-
suggested and patented in the literature [74, 75]. bility of DSPs, phase transformation, and crystallization
Only a few studies have been conducted into anion enlargement of DSPs during Bayer process that may affect
incorporation in DSP that are relevant to Bayer process the refinery aluminium grade or subsequent separation of
temperatures, caustic and sodium aluminate concentrations DSP with other minerals in bauxite residue.
[7, 76, 77]. Fundamental studies by Seimiya et al. into The concentration of NaOH and NaAl(OH)4 is a primary
desilication in the presence of impurities revealed that the factor that affects the concentration of silicate in Bayer
percentage of anions enclathrated in DSP increases with liquor. The solubility of silicate in aluminate-free solutions is
higher synthesis temperatures and longer times [78–80]. higher than in aluminate-bearing solutions under Bayer
Sodalite synthesised with added Na2CO3 contained up to liquor conditions, and the relationship between silicate
300% more CO32− than control tests without impurity concentration and caustic concentration is positively corre-
addition. The results also suggested that there is some lated while the equilibrium silicate concentration decreases
preference to incorporate not only CO32−, but also Cl− and with decreasing aluminate concentration. The temperature
SO42− into the crystal lattice over OH− and Al(OH)4− [80]. has minimal impact on solubility within a range of 30–75 °C
Comprehensive studies on anion impurities and their but has been shown to intensify at Bayer digestion temper-
effects on DSP were conducted over two decades [13, 52, atures. The crystalline phase also affects silica levels in the
54, 61, 71, 81]. The composition of sodalite formed after Bayer liquor, with the early amorphous phase formed during
predesilication and digestion in liquors containing added the Bayer process contributing to higher silica concentration.
sodium salts such as NaCl, Na2CO3, or Na2SO4 salts was For mineral phase transformation during the Bayer pro-
investigated, which shows that the magnitude of anion cess, sodalite and cancrinite are common types of DSPs
incorporation into sodalite under pseudo-Bayer conditions (digestion-soluble products) formed during the process from
follows the trend: OH− < Al(OH)4− < Cl− < CO32− < SO42 kaolinite. These DSPs are known to form because of
−
. The incorporation of chloride (Cl−) and sulphate (SO42−) solution-mediated silica-rich phase transformations, and the
was also observed to follow a Langmuir-type isotherm with crystallization pathway occurs via the Ostwald successive
increasing anion concentration, which was later supported transformation step rule. Anion impurities present in Bayer
by Whittington et al., Smith et al., and Vogrin et al. [13, 81, liquors can impact the phase transformation rates and trace
82]. These studies were beneficial as they modelled quanti- amounts of impurities can cause significant effects on the
tative anion incorporation into DSP, although they did not crystal formation process. Future studies need to be done to
relate to other fundamental factors such as reaction kinetics. clarify the chemical composition and mineral structures of
In addition to being incorporated into the DSP structure, DSPs formed during Bayer process in the presence of anion
anions can promote or suppress the phase transformation impurities.
10 H. Peng et al.
Acknowledgements The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial 18. Mostafa, A.G., J.M. Eakman, and S.L. Yarbro, Prediction of
support from Rio Tinto and the Alumina Workshop Scholarship for this standard heats and Gibbs free energies of formation of solid
project. We acknowledge the facilities and the scientific and technical inorganic salts from group contributions. Industrial & Engineering
assistance of the Australian Microscopy and Microanalysis Research Chemistry Research, 1995. 34(12): p. 4577–4582.
Facility at the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The Univer- 19. Park, H. and P. Englezos, Thermodynamic modeling of sodium
sity of Queensland. aluminosilicate formation in aqueous alkaline solutions. Industrial
& Engineering Chemistry Research, 1999. 38(12): p. 4959–4965.
20. Moloy, E.C., Q. Liu, and A. Navrotsky, Formation and hydration
enthalpies of the hydrosodalite family of materials. Microporous
References and Mesoporous Materials, 2006. 88(1): p. 283–292.
21. Zeng, L. and Z. Li, Solubility and Modeling of Sodium
1. Smith, P., The processing of high silica bauxites—review of Aluminosilicate in NaOH–NaAl (OH)4 Solutions and Its Applica-
existing and potential processes. Hydrometallurgy, 2009. 98(1): tion to Desilication. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,
p. 162–176. 2012. 51(46): p. 15193–15206.
2. Misra, C. and C. Misra, Industrial alumina chemicals. Vol. 17. 22. Kurdakova, S., et al., Thermodynamic properties of synthetic
1986: American Chemical Society Washington, DC. calcium-free carbonate cancrinite. Physics and Chemistry of
3. Peng, H. and J. Vaughan. In-Situ XRD Investigation of Bauxite Minerals, 2014. 41(1): p. 75–83.
Dehydroxylation. in TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition. 2018. 23. Liu, Q., H. Xu, and A. Navrotsky, Nitrate cancrinite: Synthesis,
Springer. characterization, and determination of the enthalpy of formation.
4. Faulstich, F.R.L., et al., Raman spectroscopic analysis of real Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2005. 87(2): p. 146–152.
samples: Brazilian bauxite mineralogy. Spectrochimica Acta Part 24. Ogorodova, L., et al., Cancrinite and cancrisilite in the
A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2011. 80(1): Khibina-Lovozero alkaline complex: Thermochemical and thermal
p. 102–105. data. Geochemistry International, 2009. 47(3): p. 260–267.
5. Laws, M.P., Reactions of Kaolinite in the Predesilication 25. LaMacchia, R., Toward a better understanding of desilication
Processing of Bauxite Ores. 2005: University of Melbourne, product (DSP) precipitation kinetics, in Ninth International
School of Chemistry. Alumina Quality Workshop. 2012, AQW Incorporated: Perth,
6. Lowe, J.L. and C.U.o.T.D.o.A. Chemistry, DSP in the Bayer Western Australia. p. 214–218.
Process: A Fundamental Study of Its Precipitation and Role in 26. Gasteiger, H.A., W.J. Frederick, and R.C. Streisel, Solubility of
Impurity Removal. 2007: Curtin University of Technology. aluminosilicates in alkaline solutions and a thermodynamic
7. Breuer, R., L. Barsotti, and A. Kelly, Behavior of silica in sodium equilibrium model. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,
aluminate solutions. Extractive Metallurgy of Aluminum, 1963. 1: 1992. 31(4): p. 1183–1190.
p. 133–157. 27. Staker, W., Internal Communication. 2017.
8. Oku, T. and K. Yamada, The dissolution rate of quartz and the 28. Königsberger, E., P.M. May, and G. Hefter, A comprehensive
rate of desilication in the Bayer liquor. Essential Readings in Light physicochemical model of synthetic Bayer liquors, in Seventh
Metals: Alumina and Bauxite, Volume 1, 1971: p. 247–254. International Alumina Quality Workshop. 2005, AQW Incorpo-
9. Gilkes, R., et al. Caustic insoluble aluminium containing nanomin- rated: Perth, Western Australia. p. 74–77.
erals in bauxite from South Western Australia. in Proceedings of 29. Adamson, A.N., E.J. Bloore, and A.R. Carr, Basic principles of
the 9th International Alumina Quality Workshop. 2012. Bayer process design, in Extractive Metallurgy of Aluminum, G.
10. Jamialahmadi, M. and H. Müller-Steinhagen, Thermodynamic Gerard and P.T. Stroup, Editors. 1963, Interscience: NY. p. 23–58.
relationships for the solubility of silica in Bayer process liquor. 30. Smirnov, M.N., The metastable solubility of silica in aluminate
Aluminium (Forschung), 1992. 68(3): p. 230–234. solutions. The Soviet Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals, 1964. 37(1):
11. Peng, H., et al., The effect of leaching temperature on kaolinite and p. 16–22.
meta-kaolin dissolution and zeolite re-precipitation. Minerals 31. Leiteizen, M.G., Kinetics of converting bauxite silica to sodium
Engineering, 2021. 170: p. 107071. aluminosilicate. The Soviet Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals, 1972.
12. Peng, H., J. Vaughan, and J. Vogrin, The effect of thermal 13(5): p. 37–40.
activation of kaolinite on its dissolution and re-precipitation as 32. Cresswell, P., Factors affecting desilication of bayer process
zeolites in alkaline aluminate solution. Applied Clay Science, liquors. Proceedings of Australian Chemical Engineering Annual
2018. 157: p. 189–197. Conference, Chemeca 84, 1984. 12: p. 285–292.
13. Whittington, B., B. Fletcher, and C. Talbot, The effect of reaction 33. Hewett, K.J., A.J. White, and G.I.D. Roach, Silica solubility in
conditions on the composition of desilication product plant liquors, in AJW23/MDR (Confidential Report). 1987.
(DSP) formed under simulated Bayer conditions. Hydrometal- 34. Smith, P.G., B.L. Fletcher, and C.C. M., Silica equilibrium in
lurgy, 1998. 49(1): p. 1–22. caustic aluminate solutions, in CSIRO Minerals Products Com-
14. Barnes, M.C., J. Addai-Mensah, and A.R. Gerson, The solubility of munication MPC/P-019. 1992.
sodalite and cancrinite in synthetic spent Bayer liquor. Colloids 35. Sizgek, G.D. and D.D. Aguila, Silica equilibrium equation for a
and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1999. full range of QAL plant liquors, in Queensland Alumina Limited.
157(1): p. 101–116. 1994.
15. Müller-Steinhagen, H., Determining silica solubility in Bayer 36. Sipos, P., The structure of Al(III) in strongly alkaline aluminate
process liquor. JOM, 1998. 50(11): p. 44–49. solutions - A review. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2009. 146(1):
16. Komada, N., et al., Thermodynamic properties of sodalite at p. 1–14.
temperatures from 15 K to 1000 K. The Journal of Chemical 37. Anderson, G.M. and D.A. Crerar, Thermodynamics in geochem-
Thermodynamics, 1995. 27(10): p. 1119–1132. istry: the equilibrium model. 1993: Oxford University Press, USA.
17. Mostafa, A.G., et al., Prediction of heat capacities of solid 38. Gout, R., et al., Raman spectroscopic study of aluminum silicate
inorganic salts from group contributions. Industrial & Engineering complexes at 20°C in basic solutions. Journal of Solution
Chemistry Research, 1996. 35(1): p. 343–348. Chemistry, 2000. 29(12): p. 1173–1186.
Chemical Thermodynamics and Reaction Kinetics of Bayer Process Desilication 11
39. Peng, H., J. Vaughan, and M. Zieba, The thermodynamic 59. Subotić, B., et al., Transformation of zeolite A into hydroxyso-
approach to predicting silicate solubility. 2015. dalite: I. An approach to the mechanism of transformation and its
40. Peng, H. and J. Vaughan, Aluminate effect on desilication product experimental evaluation. Journal of Crystal Growth, 1980. 50(2):
phase transformation. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2018. 492: p. 84–91. p. 498–508.
41. Pokrovski, G., et al., Structure and stability of aluminium-silica 60. Peng, H., D. Seneviratne, and J. Vaughan, Role of the amorphous
complexes in neutral to basic solutions: Experimental study and phase during sodium aluminosilicate precipitation. Industrial &
molecular orbital calculations. Mineralogical Magazine A, 1998. Engineering Chemistry Research 2018. 57(5): p. 1408–1416.
62: p. 1194–1195. 61. Peng, H., M. Ding, and J. Vaughan, The Anion Effect on Zeolite
42. Zeng, L. and Z. Li, Dissolution Behavior of Al, Si and Fe of Linde Type A to Sodalite Phase Transformation. Industrial &
Diaspore Concentrate in NaOH−NaAl (OH) 4 Solutions at Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018. 57(31): p. 10292–10302.
Elevated Temperature. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 62. Reyes, C.A.R., C. Williams, and O.M.C. Alarcón, Nucleation and
Research, 2013. growth process of sodalite and cancrinite from kaolinite-rich clay
43. Gout, R., et al., Raman spectroscopic study of aluminum silicate under low-temperature hydrothermal conditions. Materials
complexes at 20 C in basic solutions. Journal of Solution Research, 2013. 16(2): p. 424–438.
Chemistry, 2000. 29(12): p. 1173–1186. 63. Shi, L., et al., Desilication of low alumina to caustic liquor seeded
44. Agnew, S.F. and C.T. Johnston, Aluminum solubility in complex with sodalite or cancrinite. Hydrometallurgy, 2017. 170: p. 5–15.
electrolytes, in WM2013: Waste Management Conference: Inter- 64. Radomirovic, T., et al., Crystallization of sodalite particles under
national collaboration and continuous improvement. 2013: United Bayer-type conditions. Hydrometallurgy, 2013. 137: p. 84–91.
States. 65. Vogrin, J., et al., Synthesis of zeolites using kaolin in concentrated
45. Subotic, B. and J. Bronic, Theoretical and practical aspects of sodium hydroxide-aluminate solutions. Applied Clay Science,
zeolite crystal growth. Handbook of Zeolite Science and Tech- 2023. 244: p. 107106.
nology, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York–Basel, 2003: p. 129. 66. Baur, W.H. and R.X. Fischer, LTN-type zeolite framework as an
46. Duecker, H.C., A. Weiss, and C.R. Guerra, Synthetic crystalline interpenetrating net of KFI-and SOD-type parts homeomorphic to
zeolite. 1971, Google Patents. cuprite, Cu2O. Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural
47. Ruan, S., et al., Desilication of hematite, goethite and iron powder Science, 2007. 63(2): p. 229–234.
seeded low alumina to caustic liquors. Hydrometallurgy, 2017. 67. Abdullahi, T., Z. Harun, and M.H.D. Othman, A review on
169: p. 297–305. sustainable synthesis of zeolite from kaolinite resources via
48. Ruan, S., The Mechanism and Kinetics of Sodium Aluminosilicate hydrothermal process. Advanced Powder Technology, 2017. 28
Crystallisation in Synthetic Bayer Spent Liquor. 2015, University (8): p. 1827–1840.
of South Australia. 68. Johnson, E. and S.E. Arshad, Hydrothermally synthesized zeolites
49. Teas, E.B. and J.J. Kotte. The effect of impurities on process based on kaolinite: a review. Applied Clay Science, 2014. 97:
efficiency and methods for impurity control and removal. in p. 215–221.
Bauxite Symposium IV, Kingston. 1980. 69. Zheng, K., et al., The influence of sodium carbonate on sodium
50. Smith, P., et al. Understanding growth of DSP in the presence of aluminosilicate crystallisation and solubility in sodium aluminate
inorganic ions. in Proceedings of the 6th International Alumina solutions. Journal of Crystal Growth, 1997. 171(1): p. 197–208.
Quality Workshop. 2002. Brisbane Convention & Exhibition 70. Bosnar, S., et al., Influence of anions on the kinetics of zeolite A
Centre Queensland, Australia. crystallization:: a population balance analysis. Journal of crystal
51. Vogrin, J., et al., Influence of chloride on sodium aluminosilicate growth, 2004. 267(1–2): p. 270–282.
solubility in Bayer liquor. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 71. Wang, S., et al., Revealing the effect of anions on the formation
2020. 299: p. 110086. and transformation of zeolite LTA in caustic solutions: an in-situ
52. Vogrin, J., et al., The anion effect on sodium aluminosilicates synchrotron PXRD study. Crystal Growth & Design, 2023. 23(5).
formed under Bayer process digestion conditions. Hydrometal- 72. Riley, G., et al., Plant impurity balances and inclusion in DSP, in
lurgy, 2020. 192: p. 105236. Fifth International Alumina Quality Workshop. 1999, AQW
53. Xu, B. and P. Smith, The effect of iron sources on caustic and Incorporated: Bunbury, Western Australia. p. 404–414.
alumina recovery from synthetic bayer DSP (sodalite). Hydromet- 73. Lowe, J.L., DSP in the Bayer process: A fundamental study of its
allurgy, 2012. 129: p. 26–29. precipitation and role in impurity removal, in Department of
54. Lowe, J., et al., Incorporation of impurity anions into DSP: insights Applied Chemistry. 2007, Curtin University of Technology.
into structure and stability from computer modelling. Molecular 74. Flint, E.P., L. Shartsis, and L.S. Wells, Method of reducing the
Simulation, 2006. 32(01): p. 35–44. concentration of silica in sodium aluminate solutions (US2519362
55. Lowe, J., et al. Morphology and crystallinity: Insights into the A). 1950.
mechanism of growth of DSP. in 7th International alumina quality 75. Feher, I., et al., Reducing or compensating for sodium hydroxide
workshop. 2005. loss produced during alumina manufacture. Fr Demande, 1973. 2:
56. Whittington, B. and T. Fallows, Formation of lime-containing p. 166–188.
desilication product (DSP) in the Bayer process: factors influenc- 76. Teas, E.B. and J.J. Kotte, The effect of impurities on process
ing the laboratory modelling of DSP formation. Hydrometallurgy, efficiency and methods for impurity control and removal, in
1997. 45(3): p. 289–303. Proceedings of Bauxite Symposium, No. IV. 1980, Journal of the
57. Barnes, M.C., J. Addai-Mensah, and A.R. Gerson, The mechanism Geographic Society of Jamaica. p. 100–129.
of the sodalite-to-cancrinite phase transformation in synthetic 77. Whittington, B.I., B.L. Fletcher, and C. Talbot, The effect of
spent Bayer liquor. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 1999. reaction conditions on the composition of desilication product
31(3): p. 287–302. (DSP) formed under simulated bayer conditions. Hydrometal-
58. Barnes, M.C., J. Addai-Mensah, and A.R. Gerson, The kinetics of lurgy, 1998. 49(1–2): p. 1–22.
desilication of synthetic spent Bayer liquor and sodalite crystal 78. Seimiya, S. and M. Shietoshi, Studies on sodalite compounds in
growth. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineer- the Bayer process (2nd report). Journal of Japan Institute of Light
ing Aspects, 1999. 147(3): p. 283–295. Metals (Keikinzoku), 1962. 12(5): p. 286–291.
12 H. Peng et al.
79. Seimiya, S. and S. Mori, Study on sodalite compounds in the bayer 81. Smith, P.G., et al., The composition of DSP formed under
process (3rd Report): Dissolution phenomenon of sodalite com- predesilication and high temperature Bayer digestion conditions.
pounds in sodium aluminate solution. Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals, 2001. 1: p. 5–11.
Light Metals, 1962. 12(6): p. 351–354. 82. Vogrin, J., et al., The influence of sodium sulphate on sodium
80. Seimiya, S., Some properties of sodalite in red mud, in Extractive aluminosilicate solubility in Bayer liquor aiding the desilication
Metallurgy or Aluminum, G. Gerard and P.T. Stroup, Editors. process. Hydrometallurgy, 2023. 219: p. 106079.
1963, Interscience: NY. p. 115–132.
Challenges with Characterizing
and Processing Goethite-Rich Jamaican
Bauxites
Abstract Introduction
Low-temperature alumina plants in Jamaica traditionally
process hematite-rich ores with manageable concentra- The Bayer process uses high-pressure digestion conditions
tions of mineral impurities. As these ores become scarce, to extract alumina minerals from bauxite [1]. During the
the new bauxite mines have lower available alumina, process, a variety of impurities often dissolve and eventually
higher goethite, and higher concentrations of phosphorus, impact the liquor characteristics, alumina yield, and quality,
chromium, and manganese contaminants. Since the often making the alumina unsuitable for smelter operations
minerals associated with some of the minor impurities [2]. Traditionally mined Jamaican bauxites are gibbsitic, red
have not been identified, this paper explores whether the in colour, and contain hematite as the main iron mineral.
contaminants accumulate in the coarse or fine bauxite These ores, generally found at low altitudes, contain low
fractions. Samples of hematite-rich bauxite from the concentrations of phosphorus and metal impurities. As
traditional mining areas and also goethitic ores from the supplies of these ores decline, new mining areas with goe-
new mines were wet-sieved into three size fractions thitic bauxite having lower available alumina and higher
(+200, −200/+325, and −325 mesh). Each fraction was concentrations of chromium, zinc, and phosphorus are being
investigated using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and X-ray explored [3]. These yellow bauxites are mainly found in
diffraction (XRD) spectroscopies. Following digestion, hillside locations that are dominated by pocket deposits with
their caustic soluble concentrations of phosphorus, highly variable mineral compositions [4, 5].
chromium, and zinc were also determined. The traditional The local Bayer plants have well-established methods for
bauxites had no correlation between size fraction and the processing hematite-rich ores containing 0.1–0.4% P2O5.
alumina, iron, calcium, or phosphorus concentrations in However, as the use of goethitic bauxites becomes immi-
the ore, however larger particles had slightly more nent, plants require new strategies to manage bauxite blends
manganese impurities. In contrast, larger particles from with higher concentrations of phosphorus (1–2.5% P2O5),
the new mines had higher concentrations of iron and zinc (0.02–0.06% ZnO), and chromium (0.06–0.20%
chromium impurities while smaller particles contained Cr2O3). High P2O5 concentrations in bauxite have significant
marginally more alumina. During digestion, the new implications for soluble phosphorus control and lime
bauxites gave higher caustic soluble P, Zn, and Cr and requirements; liquor viscosity and alumina yield and purity
will be more challenging and costly to process into may also be impacted [3]. Poorly controlled soluble phos-
alumina that meet the required specifications. phorus may reduce mud settling rates, lower filtration effi-
ciency, cause scale formation, and increase fines production
Keywords during precipitation [6].
Jamaican bauxite Hematite
Caustic soluble phosphorus
Goethite Size fraction The main phosphorus mineral in goethitic bauxite is cran-
dallite (CaAl3(PO4)2(OH)5H2O), however apatite (Ca5(PO4,
CO3)3 (F, OH, Cl), wavellite (Al3(PO4)2(OH)3(H2O)5, and
variscite (AlPO42H2O) may also be present. These minerals
M. Coley (&) A. Greenaway A. Buckley K. Henry J. James dissolve differently in caustic, for example, apatites are spar-
J. Brown ingly soluble while crandallite dissolves quite readily. Hence,
Department of Chemistry, The University of the West Indies, unless the phosphorus mineralogy is known, it is difficult to
Mona, Kingston, 7, Jamaica establish the lime requirements needed for phosphorus control
e-mail: [email protected]
during predesilication and digestion [7, 8]. Managing the metal concentration ranges of P2O5 (0.11–0.95%), ZnO (0.003–
impurities (Cr2O3, ZnO, and MnO) is also challenging as their 0.140%), and Cr2O3 (0.09–0.19%) within the traditional
low concentrations in the ore make it difficult to identify their mining area. In selecting samples from the new mining area,
source minerals using traditional X-ray diffraction (XRD) the concentrations of impurities within the different ore
techniques. It is also difficult to predict their caustic soluble bodies (P2O5, 0.32–24.6%; ZnO, 0.018–0.308%; and Cr2O3,
concentrations and to design protocols for their control [7, 9]. 0.06–0.37%) were also taken into consideration [11]. The
Jamaican bauxites are mainly fine particles but these may samples selected included processable bauxites and also a
aggregate to form larger units. The presence of sand, lime- few with unusually high or low impurity concentrations. The
stone, and a variety of other minerals often results in crushed extreme samples were included to enhance detection of
bauxites having a fairly wide range of particle size. differences in the mineral concentrations of each bauxite
This paper compares the characteristics of traditionally fraction.
mined, red, hematite-rich Jamaican bauxite with samples of Six bauxite samples were selected from the traditional
yellow, goethitic ores that are slated for mining in the near mining area and six from the new mines. The metal oxide
future. These new bauxites have high phosphate and metal concentrations of exploration samples from each mining area
impurity concentrations. Crushed exploration samples from are shown in Tables 1 and 2. These XRF concentrations
both mines were wet-sieved and fractioned into three typical were not confirmed in this study and were only used as
categories: >75 lm (+200 mesh), 45–75 lm (−200/+325 guides for sample selection. Data in the tables are organized
mesh), and <45 lm (−352 mesh). Selected fractions from based on the % P2O5 concentrations.
each mining area were analysed using XRF to investigate
metal oxide concentrations. XRD was used to explore
potential differences in mineralogy and following digestion, Bauxite Analysis
caustic soluble P2O5, Cr2O3, and ZnO were measured to
assess dissolved impurity concentrations in the process Bauxite samples (100 g) were spread out over the surface of
liquors. The study seeks to determine whether there are a #200 mesh sieve (Fisher Scientific). The mesh and sample
distinct differences in the concentrations of bauxite impuri- were then partially submerged in distilled water and the
ties in the different fractions of bauxite samples taken from sieve shaken for four minutes to allow particles capable of
the current and future mining areas. Since the processing of exiting the mesh to escape. Particles retained on the sieve
goethitic bauxites has been associated with slow mud set- were transferred, dried at 100 °C, weighed, and subsequently
tling and low alumina productivity, the study will also analysed. The filtrate suspension was further wet-sieved
explore process challenges that might impact use of the new using a #325 mesh and particles retained on this sieve were
bauxites to produce smelter-grade alumina [3, 10]. treated as described above. The fine bauxite particles that
exited the #325 sieve were allowed to settle overnight and
were then filtered using Whatman #1, #40, and #42 filter
Materials and Methods papers. The #42 filter paper (2.5 µm pore size) was fitted in
the Büchner funnel first, followed by the #40 (8 µm pore
Sample Selection size) while the #1 filter paper (24 cm) was cupped within the
filter funnel to ensure that all the −325 fraction particles
Composite exploration samples of traditionally mined were captured. After filtration, the sample was dried as
bauxites were studied alongside the ore samples that domi- previously described.
nate the future mining area. Samples having comparable Pressed pellets were produced from each bauxite fraction
Al2O3, Fe2O3, SiO2, and TiO2 concentrations were selected and elemental concentrations were determined using a
from both mines. Samples were selected to span the PANalytical Magix Pro XRF operating at 40 kV and 60 mA.
Mineralogy of selected samples was examined using a standard solutions via flame atomic absorption spectropho-
Bruker Analytical D5005 X-ray diffractometer operated at tometry (FAAS) at 231.9 nm for Zn and 357.9 nm for Cr.
45 kV and 40 mA. Scans were collected between 4 and 75°
2h [11].
The XRF elemental data and the measured loss of mass Results and Discussion
(LOM) values were combined with data on peak intensities
from the XRD scans using the X-ray database programme Bauxite samples from a currently mined hematite-rich area
(XDB Powder Diffraction Phase Analytical System version and from a new potential replacement mine were studied to
3.107) [12, 13]. The XDB software creates a full-profile fit compare their characteristics and to evaluate their
of the XRD and quantifies the minerals identified based on low-temperature processabilities. Bauxites were compared in
the XRF and LOM measurements. Minerals that are unde- terms of their bulk particle size, elemental concentrations,
tected in the XRD scans are sometimes identified using the mineralogy, and the caustic solubilities of key contaminants
XDB software and their concentrations are estimated [14]. (P2O5, Cr2O3, and ZnO).
The available alumina concentrations were determined on
each bauxite fraction using a proprietary FTIR analytical
method. Size Fraction
Table 3 Size fraction and % available alumina of bauxite samples from the traditional and new mining areas
Traditional hematite-rich mining area New goethitic mining area
Goethitic bauxites Sample % % available Goethitic bauxites Sample % % available
fractions mass alumina fractions mass alumina
DCS11A +200 68.7 47.9 DCN30A +200 38.6 40.3
−200/+325 8.6 47.0 −200/+325 11.8 40.5
−325 22.7 44.7 −325 49.5 37.6
DCS10B +200 39.8 42.6 DCN47A +200 47.1 47
−200/+325 9.3 41.3 −200/+325 8.0 47.1
−325 51.0 40.2 −325 44.9 44.2
DCS21B +200 67.6 46.7 DCN10A +200 38.7 43.6
−200/+325 9.7 46.0 −200/+325 6.4 41.2
−325 22.7 43.1 −325 55.0 39.2
DCS08B +200 61.1 40.1 DCN16A +200 34.4 40.9
−200/+325 11.5 41.1 −200/+325 6.0 41
−325 27.4 37.4 −325 59.5 37.7
DCS14B +200 39.9 43.0 DCN21 +200 56.1 40.4
−200/+325 9.6 43.4 −200/+325 11.9 40.2
−325 50.5 41.5 −325 32.0 36.9
DCS16A +200 73.1 38.6 DCN29 +200 58.6 39.1
−200/+325 7.5 39.1 −200/+325 7.8 41
−325 19.4 37.5 −325 33.7 37.8
Average size +200 58.4 43.2 Average size +200 45.6 41.9
fractions −200/+325 9.4 43.0 fractions −200/+325 8.6 41.8
−325 32.3 40.7 −325 45.8 38.9
XRD Analysis of Al2O3, SiO2, CaO, P2O5, and ZnO are roughly similar
within the three size fractions for each bauxite (Table 4).
Figure 1 shows the overlaid diffractograms of the unsieved Figure 2 shows that the MnO concentrations increase with
DCN21A bauxite sample and its +325 and −325 fractions. particle size for all but one sample (DCS11A). Significant
DCN21A is from the new mining area. Scans of the sieved differences in MnO concentrations are observed for the
and unsieved samples are similar which suggests that their fractions of samples DCS21B and DCS14 and it would be
mineralogies are also similar. The broad peak at values >15° worthwhile to probe these fractions to explore whether there
2h concealed the boehmite peaks. This broad peak was is improved opportunity to identify the Mn minerals in each.
characteristic of all the scans recorded on the instrument Similar differentiation was not observed for any other element
during the time and resulted from interferences due to the within the traditional bauxite mines.
sample holder. Fractions of the traditionally mined bauxites
were not examined via XRD. The New Bauxite Mines
The % Fe2O3 and % Cr2O3 in goethitic bauxites from the
new mining area occur in higher concentrations in the +200
XRF Analysis bauxite fractions (Table 5). The % Fe2O3 were lowest in the
−325 bauxite fractions except maybe for sample DCN21A.
Traditional Bauxite Mines The fine fractions tended to have higher % P2O5, however
The XRF data for bauxites from the traditional mines are in the trends were not always consistent (Fig. 3). The % P2O5
Table 4 and those for the new mining area are in Table 5. As in fractions of DCN29 from the new mining area (Fig. 3) are
with previous tables, samples are organized based on the XRF well differentiated and are potentially useful for identifying
concentrations of P2O5 in the original unsieved samples. Data the phosphorus minerals in each. Studies of their caustic
for the traditionally mined ores show that the concentrations soluble concentrations could also be pursued. No defined
Challenges with Characterizing and Processing Goethite-Rich Jamaican Bauxites 17
4 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2-Theta - Scale
Table 4 XRF data for fractions of bauxite samples from the traditional mining area
Sample % Al2O3 % Fe2O3 % SiO2 % CaO % P2O5 % Cr2O3 % ZnO % MnO
DCS 11A +200 47.2 18.2 0.8 0.03 0.11 0.164 0.014 0.16
DCS 11A +325 47.3 17.7 0.8 0.04 0.09 0.137 0.014 0.16
DCS 11A −325 47.9 18.2 0.82 0.04 0.1 0.139 0.016 0.16
DCS 10B +200 47.3 19.5 2.49 0.27 0.15 0.147 0.023 0.34
DCS 10B +325 47.0 18.4 2.38 0.21 0.14 0.110 0.023 0.21
DCS 10B −325 47.1 18.4 2.4 0.19 0.15 0.105 0.024 0.17
DCS 21B +200 46.6 19.6 0.58 0.04 0.15 0.113 0.028 1.11
DCS 21B +325 46.2 19.1 0.57 0.04 0.15 0.108 0.021 0.76
DCS 21B −325 46.7 19.6 0.61 0.04 0.15 0.110 0.022 0.71
DCS 8B +200 47.1 18.3 2.34 0.08 0.16 0.079 0.027 0.53
DCS 8B +325 47.1 18.5 2.34 0.06 0.16 0.078 0.024 0.37
DCS 8B −325 47.7 19.2 2.44 0.06 0.17 0.082 0.025 0.34
DCS 14 +200 47.9 16.0 2.6 0.11 0.18 0.121 0.102 2.53
DCS 14 +325 47.8 16.4 2.59 0.10 0.19 0.120 0.071 1.64
DCS 14 −325 47.9 16.6 2.61 0.10 0.19 0.121 0.045 0.90
DCS 16A +200 46.0 18.0 3.48 0.15 0.77 0.121 0.089 0.38
DCS 16A −325 46.5 18.5 3.44 0.19 0.81 0.114 0.093 0.36
trends were observed between the % Al2O3, SiO2, CaO, It is probable that the characteristics of bauxite fractions of
MnO, and ZnO in relation to the particle size of samples each sample are mainly determined by small constituent
from the new mining area. bauxite particles that aggregate together. The data so far are
An assessment of the XRF data for bauxite samples from not conclusive however they suggest that fractioning bauxite
both mining areas shows that some metal species concentrate samples followed by use of conventional XRF, XRD or other
in the coarse or fine bauxite particles but this is not widespread. traditional techniques will not concentrate mineral species
18 M. Coley et al.
3.0
2.5
2.0
% MnO
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
11A 11A 11A - 10 B 10B 10B - 21B 21B 21B - 8B 8B 8B - 14 14 14 - 16A 16A -
+200 +325 325 +200 +325 325 +200 +325 325 +200 +325 325 +200 +325 325 +200 325
Fig. 2 % MnO in fractions of bauxite samples from the traditional hematite-rich mining area. (DCS precedes the name of each sample in the chart)
Table 5 XRF data for fractions of bauxite samples from the new mining area
Sample % Al2O3 % Fe2O3 % SiO2 % CaO % P2O5 % Cr2O3 % ZnO % MnO
DCN 30A +200 46.2 22.9 0.34 0.09 0.85 0.316 0.080 2.19
DCN 30A +325 48.0 17.4 0.32 0.09 0.8 0.169 0.100 2.35
DCN 30A −325 48.4 16.1 0.32 0.10 0.81 0.141 0.105 2.32
DCN 10A (+200) 46.0 18.6 0.45 1.02 3.08 0.241 0.106 1.17
DCN10A (−325) 46.1 16.8 0.47 1.16 3.15 0.139 0.090 0.75
DCN 16A +200 42.9 25.8 1.17 0.24 1.62 0.711 0.041 0.06
DCN 16A −325 47.9 16.4 1.4 0.40 1.98 0.198 0.033 0.04
DCN 21 +200 46.0 14.8 1.83 3.21 5.12 0.169 0.097 0.29
DCN 21 +325 46.6 14.7 1.89 3.03 5.28 0.128 0.098 0.34
DCN 21 −325 46.3 14.2 1.98 2.95 4.85 0.113 0.100 0.33
DCN 29 +200 44.8 21.8 0.36 1.87 6.03 0.391 0.053 0.24
DCN 29 +325 47.0 16.0 0.36 2.58 7.63 0.208 0.053 0.22
DCN 29 −325 47.0 12.2 0.36 3.65 10.20 0.135 0.054 0.16
12
10
8
% P2O5
0
30A 30A 30A 10A 10A 16A 16A 21 21 21 29 29 29
(+200) (+325) (-325) (+200) (-325) (+200) (-325) (+200) (+325) (-325) (+200) (+325) (-325)
Samples Names - New goethite-rich mine
Fig. 3 % P2O5 in fractions of bauxite samples from the new mining area (DCN precedes the name of each sample in the chart)
Challenges with Characterizing and Processing Goethite-Rich Jamaican Bauxites 19
enough to provide improved mineralogy information. The The plots below are for fractions of the bauxite samples
approach seems promising for samples with unusually high from each mining area. Figures 4a, c, and e are for currently
impurity concentrations such as DCN29 however. mined bauxites while Figs. 4b, d, and f are for the new ores.
A plot of % MnO versus % ZnO for bauxite fractions from the
Elemental Correlations traditional mine (Fig. 4a) shows a strong correlation with only
The mineral impurities in bauxites are typically at low one bauxite (DCS16A) deviating significantly from the line.
concentrations and are difficult to identify using traditional Feret and See identified lithiophorite ((Al,Li)(Mn4+,Mn3+)
XRD. Simple plots of the elemental concentrations of spe- O2(OH)2) as the main manganese mineral in Jamaican bauxite.
cies in the ore may give clues about their mineral associa- They proposed that Zn2+ substitutes for Li+ and results in a
tions [15]. This approach is useful where distinct minerals of strong correlation between the Zn and Mn [16]. They proposed
the low-concentration species do not exist or where the that zinchophorite, a zinc-enriched lithiophorite, is the
mineral concentrations are extremely low. zinc-contaminating mineral in Jamaican bauxite.
3.0 2.5
% MnO % MnO - DCS 16A y = 19.34x - 0.71
2.0
2.0 y = 26.05x - 0.16 R² = 0.34
% MnO
R² = 0.88
% MnO
1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.00 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
a % ZnO b % ZnO
1.0 12
y = 1.09x + 0.11 10 y = 1.93x + 1.07
0.8 R² = 0.777
R² = 0.14
8
% P2O5
0.6
% P 2O 5
6
0.4
4
0.2 2
0.0 0
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
c % CaO d % CaO
0.20
0.8
0.15 y = 0.037x - 0.41
0.6
R² = 0.824
% Cr2O3
% Cr2O3
0.10 0.4
Fig. 4 Correlation of selected elemental oxides in bauxites from the traditional (a, c and e) and new goethitic mining areas (b, d and f)
20 M. Coley et al.
Although the number of samples in this study is small, the samples and has an extensive database on the minerals found in
strong correlation observed between % MnO and % ZnO in bauxites across the world. For a given bauxite, the programme
the hematitic bauxites suggests occurrence of a single mineral apportions the metal species to their natural host minerals such
that contains both metals. A plot of % MnO versus % ZnO for that they are distributed to match the XRD profile while
the goethitic bauxites suggests that the mineral associations of achieving a balance with the XRF concentrations [14].
zinc and manganese are much more complex. Zinc concen- Only one bauxite sample was studied via XDB in this pre-
trations in these ores are also consistently higher and more liminary work. Fractions of the unsieved and sieved portions of
than one mineral sources might be present. The higher zinc sample DCN21A (+200, −200/+325, and −325) were exam-
concentrations and possibly the presence of uncharacteristic ined. The XDB output (Table 6) predicts the distribution of the
zinc-bearing contaminants might have implications for the metal oxides among the various bauxite minerals in the sieved
management of soluble Zn in the new bauxite. and unsieved fractions of DCN21A. The programme identified
Figure 4c shows a very weak correlation between % P2O5 gibbsite as the main alumina mineral in all the samples. All
and % CaO. This contrasts with the fairly strong relationship samples had additional alumina in boehmite, crandallite, and
observed in Fig. 4d which shows the plot for the new aluminous goethite; however, nordstrandite was only detected
bauxite mine. Previous work has identified crandallite as the in the −325 fraction. Based on the XDB analysis, crandallite
main P mineral in the new mine [6, 11]. Bauxites from both was the only P mineral detected in the unsieved DCN21A.
mines will likely have very different caustic soluble P2O5 Analysis of the +200 mesh DCN21A fraction identified both
concentrations. crandallite and hydroxyapatite however.
Figure 4e plots % Cr2O3 against % Fe2O3 for the cur- While the predictive ability of XDB relies heavily on the
rently mined ore while Fig. 4f gives a similar plot for the quality of the XRD scans and the accuracy of the XRF data,
new mine. Clear differences in the mineral associations are the results obtained for DCN21A demonstrate the potential
again observed. This suggests need for careful study of of using XDB to study fractions of bauxite samples, espe-
caustic soluble chromium in the new bauxites. Based on the cially those with unusually high concentrations of mineral
strong correlation in Fig. 4f, the chromium impurity is impurities. Further work is required to determine whether
probably associated with the iron mineral in the new mine. these approaches can eventually identify the presence of
low-concentration mineral species, especially those associ-
ated with Cr or Zn.
XDB Analysis
The XDB software was applied to fractions of the bauxite Caustic Soluble Concentrations
samples to predict their mineral constituents by relating their
measured XRF and LOM data with the XRD scan obtained in The concentrations of caustic soluble P2O5, Cr2O3, and ZnO
each case. The programme was specially developed for bauxite were studied for three bauxite samples from the new mining
Table 6 XDB predictions of the mineral species in the unsieved and sieved fractions of sample DCN21A (new mining area)
Table 7 % caustic soluble P2O5, Cr2O3, and ZnO in different size fractions of bauxite samples from the new mining area
Sample % P2O5 % caustic soluble % Cr2O3 % caustic soluble % ZnO % caustic soluble
(XRF) P2O5 (XRF) Cr2O3 (XRF) ZnO
DCN21 (+200) 5.12 55.0 0.169 14.8 0.097 12.1
DCN21 (+325) 5.28 52.5 0.128 17.2 0.098 10.6
DCN21 (−325) 4.85 55.0 0.113 15.5 0.100 11.0
DCN16A(+200) 1.62 88.0 0.711 10.0 0.041 1.2
DCN16A (−325) 1.98 80.5 0.198 21.8 0.033 1.7
DCN30A (+200) 0.85 99.5 0.316 25.0 0.080 6.2
DCN30A (+325) 0.80 100.5 0.169 35.0 0.100 6.35
DCN30A (−325) 0.81 101 0.141 38.5 0.105 5.05
area (Table 7). DCN30A is a typical low P bauxite but its Management of Caustic Soluble P2O5, ZnO,
low % CaO suggests presence of a non-crandallite P mineral, and Cr2O3 from the New Mining Area
possibly variscite (Table 5). DCN21A has excess % CaO
beyond that due to crandallite alone; however, for sample Of the three impurities studied in this work, the management
DCN16A, the %CaO:%P2O5 ratio suggests that crandallite is of P2O5 will likely require the most significant effort and
likely the only P mineral that is present (Table 5) [11]. The possibly will incur the greatest cost. The solubilities of the
caustic soluble concentrations of bauxite fractions from the P2O5 minerals in this work (52.5–100%) are much higher
currently mined areas were not studied as their soluble than those observed for the Zn (1.2–12.1%) and Cr impu-
concentrations in plant liquors are typically low and are well rities (10.0–38.5%) (see Table 7). Bauxite blending has long
known. Strategies to manage their build-up in the traditional been used as an option for managing high concentrations of
low-temperature process are well established. On the other bauxite impurities, hence this section explores the use of
hand, the solubility characteristics of P2O5, Cr2O3, and ZnO blending to manage the high % P2O5 in the new bauxite.
from the new bauxite mines are unclear and the extent to Samples of currently mined bauxites were digested by
which they dissolve from each bauxite fraction has not been themselves and in blends with the goethitic ores. The mg/L
reported. caustic soluble P2O5 was measured in each case and is
Based on data from the three bauxites, there are no major reported in Table 8.
differences in the extraction of phosphorus from the fractions When bauxite from the traditional mines (0.22% P2O5)
of each ore (Table 7). There were major differences however was digested under low-temperature conditions, the average
between each sample. Several factors could be responsible P2O5 concentration was 169 mg/L. In contrast, separate
for the differences, for example, the nature of the P mineral digestions of unsieved ores from the new mines containing
(e.g., in DCN30A) or the presence of excess CaO in the 1.0%, 2.0%, and 3.0% P2O5 gave soluble P2O5 concentra-
bauxite (e.g., in DCN21A), among others [11]. On average, tions of 981 g/L (75% caustic soluble P2O5), 2287 mg/L
about 70% of the P2O5 that enters with the bauxite is (85.5% caustic soluble P2O5), and 3019 mg/L P2O5 (74.9%
expected to end up in the liquor [11]. The results in this caustic soluble P2O5), respectively (Table 8). Separate
study, however, show a much wider range and illustrate the blends comprising 25, 50, and 75% ore from the new mines
difficulties that will be encountered in managing process (1, 2, and 3% P2O5) were combined with the matching
impurities from these ores. proportions of the traditionally processed ore (i.e., 75, 50,
As seen for soluble phosphorus (Table 7), there is no and 25% of traditional ore; 0.22% P2O5).
significant differentiation in the soluble Zn concentrations The soluble phosphorus concentrations (mg/L P2O5) of
among the different bauxite fractions. Cr2O3 was more digest liquors from each goethitic bauxite sample and its
extractable from the finer fractions of DCN16A and blends with the low P ore (from current mines) were plotted
DCN30A, however there is insufficient data from which to against the % P2O5 in the bauxite. The plots gave linear
draw conclusions. relationships with R2 > 0.995 (Table 8). As the total % P2O5
22 M. Coley et al.
Table 8 Caustic soluble P2O5 based on digests of a traditional hematite-rich bauxite, digests of a goethitic bauxite, and digests of blends from
both ores
Blends 1% P2O5 (new bauxite) with 2% P2O5 new bauxite) with 3% P2O5 new bauxite) with
0.2% P2O5 (traditional bauxite) 0.2% P2O5 (traditional bauxite) 0.2% P2O5 (traditional bauxite)
Total mg/L % caustic Total mg/L % caustic Total mg/L % caustic
P2O5 P2O5 soluble P2O5 P2O5 P2O5 soluble P2O5 P2O5 P2O5 soluble P2O5
(%) (%) (%)
100% 0.22 165 57.5 0.22 186 64.8 0.22 157 54.9
traditional bxt
(TB)
75% TB, 25% 0.42 387 70.9 0.68 592 67 0.94 836 68.4
NB
50% TB, 50% 0.63 615 75.1 1.13 1150 78.3 1.66 1527 70.8
NB
25% TB, 75% 0.83 914 84.7 1.59 1697 82.1 2.37 2245 72.9
NB
100% new 1.03 981 75.2 2.04 2227 85.5 3.09 3019 74.9
bauxite (NB)
Equation and y = 1005.9x − 49.4; R2 = 0.999 y = 1139.8x − 120; R2 = 0.997 y = 994.7x − 90.4; R2 = 0.999
R2
impact production costs and also alumina yield and purity. If 10. Kirwan L., Lawson D., Rijkeboar A., Hodnett K., Mooney A.,
the process slurries settle slowly, this will further complicate Walker R. (2009) Characterisation of iron mineralogy in Jamaican
Bauxite and associated aspects of alumina and soda losses. Light
the processing operations. Metals, 133–138
11. Henry, K., Coley, M., Greenaway, A., (2018) The dissolution of
Phosphorus from Jamaican bauxites under low temperature Bayer
References conditions, Hydrometallurgy, 179, 132–140.
12. Sajó, I.E. X-Ray diffraction quantitative phase analysis of Bayer
process solids. In Proceedings of the10th International Congress of
1. Ostap, S., Effect of Bauxite Mineralogy on its Processing. In ICSOBA, Bhubaneshwar, India, 28–30 November 2008; pp. 71–
Bauxite Proceedings of 1984 Bauxite Symposium. The Society of 76.
Mining Engineers of the American Institute of Mining, Metallur- 13. Sajó, I.E. XDB Powder Diffraction Phase Analytical System,
gical and Petroleum Engineers Inc.: Los Angeles CA. pp 651–671. version3.107; Software, Copyright Sajó, I.E. 1987–2016; Sajó, I.
2. Teas, E.B. and J.J. Kotte. The effect of impurities on process E.: Budapest, Hungary, 2005.
efficiency and methods for impurity control and removal. In 14. Feret, F., Martin, M., Sajo, I. (1997) Quantitative Phase Analysis
Bauxite Symposium IV, Kingston. 1980. of Bidi-koum Bauxites (Guinea). Clays Clay Miner. 45, 418–427.
3. Lawson D., Rijkeboer A., Andermann L.J., Mooney A. Impact of 15. Greenaway, A.M., Bucknor, A.N., Henry K. and Coley, M.D.
Jamaican bauxite mineralogy on plant operations. Light Metals (2013) Identifying possible associations of minor and trace
2008, 113–118. elements with major elements in Jamaican hillside and catchment
4. Libby, S.C., Grubbs, D.K., Rodenburg, J.K., Wefers, K.A. (1980); bauxites using multivariate analysis tools; Minerals Engineering
The Geology, Mineralogy and Clarification Properties of Red and 53, 124–135
Yellow Jamaican Bauxites. Jamaica. Jour. Geol. Soc. Jamaica, 16. Feret, F.; See, J. (2006) Occurrence and Craracterization of Zn and
176–186. Mn in Bauxite. Light Metals 41–45.
5. Grubbs, D.K. (1982) The Iron and Phosphate Mineralogy of the 17. Lindsay, S. J. (2005) SGA requirements in coming years. Light
Bauxites in Harmons Valley and the Mocho Mountains, Jamaica. Metals 2005, 117–122.
Jour. Geol. Soc. Jamaica, 55–61 18. Powell KA, Kirwin LJ, Hodnett, K, Lawson D, Rijkeboer A.
6. Young N, Coley M, Greenaway A (2019) Mineralogical investi- Characterisation of Alumina and soda losses associated with the
gations of Jamaican hematite-rich and goethite-rich bauxites using processing of geothitic rich Jamaican bauxite. Light Metals 2009,
XRD and solid state 27Al and 31P MAS NMR spectroscopy, 151–156.
Journal of Geochemical Exploration, Vol. 200, 54–76 19. Lawson, D., Rijkeboer, A., Dajkovich, D., Jackson, M., Lawrence,
7. Authier-Martin, M., Forté, G., Ostap, S., See, J. (2001) The H. Approaches to the Processing of Jamaican Bauxite with High
Mineralogy of Bauxite for Producing Smelter-Grade Alumina. Goethite Content. In: Grandfield, J. (eds) Light Metals 2014, 11–
JOM Journal of Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 53, 36–40 14.
8. Whittington B (1996) The Chemistry of CaO and Ca(OH)2 20. Coley, M.D., Greenaway, A. M., Henry-Herah, K. E. Impacts of
Relating to the Bayer Process. Hydrometallurgy, 43, 13–35. Mineralogy on Soluble Phosphorus Concentrations during Low
9. Vind, J.; Vassiliadou, V.; Panias, D. Distribution of trace elements Temperature Temperature Processing of Jamaican Bauxite. In:
through the Bayer process and its by-products. In Proceedings of Tomsett, A (ed) Light Metals 2020, 3–11.
the 35th International ICSOBA Conference (Travaux46), Ham-
burg, Germany, 2–5 October 2017; pp. 255–267.
Sugar-Derived Causticization Additives
for the Bayer Process
Abstract Introduction
Bauxite digestion in the Bayer process results in a buildup
of sodium carbonate in the caustic liquor, which reduces Bayer process liquors are inevitably contaminated with
the efficiency of alumina production. This effect is carbonate, which arises from base-catalyzed oxidation of
mitigated by lime causticisation, during which carbonate organic compounds and dissolution of inorganic carbonate
is removed, preferably as calcium carbonate. The extent from the bauxite, and absorption of CO2 from the air [1, 2].
and efficiency of causticisation in Bayer liquors are The carbonate content of Bayer liquor is conventionally
limited by the formation of tricalcium aluminate expressed as the caustic to soda ratio, C/S, where
(TCA) and alumino-carbonates, which also reduce overall C = [NaOH] in units of g/L of Na2CO3 and S = C + [
plant productivity due to the consequent loss of alumina Na2CO3] in the same units. C/S = 1 for pure NaOH.
from the liquor. We demonstrate that TCA formation can Lime causticisation is used to limit the carbonate content
be minimized or eliminated by using sugar-derived of the liquor and thus maintain its productivity. Improve-
molecules, specifically gluconic acid, a mixture of ments in the causticization process therefore lead to better
gluconic and glucaric acids, and sodium gluconate. This liquor productivity, and hence higher alumina production, as
reduction in TCA formation improves the efficiency of well as lower lime consumption. The C/S of the main liquor
causticisation by three to four times as determined by the stream in Bayer refineries is generally in the range of 0.80–
rate constants for carbonate consumption or by the 0.95, depending on carbonate inputs and the efficiency of the
relative increase of C/S ratio. This in turn reduces causticisation process. The desired solid product of causti-
alumina and caustic losses in the causticiser, with the cisation (calcium carbonate) is rarely formed directly in
potential to improve the plant liquor C/S and hence the Bayer liquors, but mostly via alumino-carbonate intermedi-
overall productivity of the Bayer circuit. ates, with tricalcium aluminate (TCA) as the undesired
byproduct. TCA formation not only reduces causticisation
Keywords and increases lime usage but also results in alumina loss that
directly reduces the overall alumina yield of the Bayer plant.
Bayer process Causticization Organic acids and salts The relative proportions of calcium carbonate and TCA
Tricalcium aluminate inhibition depend on a range of equilibrium and kinetic factors [3, 4].
Approaches to limiting TCA formation include causticising
at high temperature (e.g., at 145 °C) in a single stage [5] or
multiple stages [6], or at normal temperatures (<105 °C)
using chemical additives such as phosphate [7] or gluconate
[8] as ‘TCA inhibitors’.
In this paper, we describe preliminary results on
A. Desai (&) J. S. An L. Tan sugar-derived molecules as TCA inhibitors or causticization
Solugen Inc., 14549 Minetta Street, Houston, TX 77035, USA additives. The inhibitors tested are gluconic acid, a mixture
e-mail: [email protected]
of gluconic and glucaric acid, and sodium gluconate. These
J. S. An molecules were produced by oxidizing sugars using Solu-
e-mail: [email protected]
gen’s proprietary, carbon-negative chemienzymatic process.
L. Tan
e-mail: [email protected]
BJUDNINGSBREF (Invitations).
Bjudningsbref böra besvaras så skyndsamt som möjligt. Intet svar
erfordras på inbjudning till en “mottagning” (reception) eller till “té.”
Bjudning till en bal bör utsändas omkring tre veckor i förväg, bjudning
till andra festligheter minst en vecka före den för samkvämet bestämda
tiden.
Inbjudningar till dansnöjen och baler utfärdas i värdinnans namn och
böra vara affattade i följande ordalag:
“Mr. Smith accepts with pleasure Mrs. Brown’s kind invitation for
Wednesday evening, December tenth.”
“Herr Smith mottager med nöje fru Browns vänliga inbjudning till
Onsdags afton, den tionde December.”
“Herr Smith är ledsen att icke vara i stånd att mottaga fru Browns
vänliga inbjudning till Onsdags afton, den tionde December.”
Form of Acceptance.
Skulle inbjudningen behöfva afböjas böra orden “äro ledsna att icke
kunna mottaga” (“regret that they cannot accept”) insättas i stället för
orden “mottaga med nöje” (“accept with pleasure”).
Inbjudningar till bröllop böra utsändas minst två veckor före
bröllopsdagen. De böra vara tryckta på papper af mindre format
(“biljett-papper”) samt bära föräldrarnes och brudens namn; de kunna
hafva följande utseende:
Reception
Mottagning
No. 24 Vernon Place, klockan half nio.
Tea
Té
Herr och fru George anhålla om nöjet af Fru Putnams sällskap till
middag Torsdagen, den 19 December, klockan sex.
Riversham Park den 10 December.
Accepting.
Mottagande svar.
Fru Putnam har det stora nöjet att mottaga Herr och Fru Georges
inbjudning till middag den 19 December.
31 Russell Square den 11 December.
The Same.
Dear Louis:
Come and dine with us on Thursday next, to meet a few old and
valued friends, whose names I shall not here mention, but I assure
you it will give you great pleasure to see them. Pray let me have a
favorable reply, and
Believe me, Yours ever sincerely,
Lucy Gordon.
The Elms, Hornsey, June 4.
En liknande inbjudning.
Käre Ludvig!
Kom och ät middag med oss nästkommande Torsdag, då du får
träffa några gamla, värderade vänner, hvilkas namn jag icke nu vill
uppenbara, men hvilka du säkerligen skall finna stort nöje i att
träffa. Var god och låt mig hafva ett gynsamt svar och var försäkrad
om, att jag förblifver
Din alltid uppriktiga vän,
Lucy Gordon.
The Elms, Hornsey, den 4 Juni.
Liknande inbjudning.
Accepting.
Mottagande Svar.
Answer Accepting.
Mottagande svar.
Declining.
Afböjande svar.
ebookbell.com