Scribd
Upload
32 views1 page

Contract Subjective Test-1

The document is a subjective test for the Indian Contract Act, 1872, consisting of various questions related to contract law, including topics such as offers, acceptance, consideration, and free consent. Students are required to attempt any ten questions within a time limit of 180 minutes for a maximum of 100 marks. The questions cover theoretical aspects and legal principles with references to case laws and provisions.

Uploaded by

ANJALI MISHRA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
32 views1 page

Contract Subjective Test-1

The document is a subjective test for the Indian Contract Act, 1872, consisting of various questions related to contract law, including topics such as offers, acceptance, consideration, and free consent. Students are required to attempt any ten questions within a time limit of 180 minutes for a maximum of 100 marks. The questions cover theoretical aspects and legal principles with references to case laws and provisions.

Uploaded by

ANJALI MISHRA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

AMBITION LAW INSTITUTE

ID No. : ____________________ Date : _____________________


Name : _____________________

INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872


Subjective Test - 1 [Sections 1 to 19]

Time : 180 Minutes Maximum Marks : 100


Note : Attempt any ten questions.
1. If certain goods are displayed either in a show window or inside the shop and such goods bear price tags,
discuss whether such display amounts to an offer to sell. Explain the distinction between offer and invitation
to offer with the help of decided cases. (Marks 10)
2. “An offer is to an acceptance what a lighted match-stick is to a train of gunpowder. It produces something
which cannot be recalled or undone”—Anson. Explain. (Marks 10)
3. Distinguish between the following, citing relevant provisions/case laws. Limit your answers to about 200
words each.
(a) ‘Specific offer’ and ‘General offer’. (Marks 10)
4. “The test of contractual intention is objective, not subjective.” Discuss. (Marks 10)
5. “Though offer and acceptance bring the parties together and constitute the outward semblance of contract,
yet most systems of law require some further evidence of the intention of the parties and in default of such
evidence refuse to recognize obligation.” (Marks 10)
6. “Revocation of proposal is death of the proposal.” Explain the statement and mention the manners of revocation.
(Marks 10)
7. What are the difficulties that arise in the application of the rule that “acceptance” must be absolute, and must
correspond with the terms of the offer? (Marks 10)
8. Minor’s contracts is ‘void ab initio’. Comment. (Marks 10)
9. “An agreement without consideration is void.” Is there any exception to it? Discuss by giving suitable illustrations.
(Marks 10)
10. “Insufficiency of consideration is immaterial but an agreement without consideration is void.” Comment.
(Marks 10)
11. In an action to avoid a contract on the ground of undue influence, the plaint has to prove two points. Explain
those points and different kinds of relations leading to presumption of undue influence which vitiates free
consent. (Marks 10)
12. Explain the meaning of ‘free consent’ as an essential element of a valid contract and enumerate the factors
vitiating ‘free-consent’. (Marks 10)

___________

Since 2001
OUR WEBSITE BUY BEST BARE ACTs. WE ARE
ambitionlawinstitute.com Ambitionpublications.com ALSO ON
1

You might also like