Lesson 4 - Kinds of Obligations, Part 1 (1)
Lesson 4 - Kinds of Obligations, Part 1 (1)
LESSON 4
KINDS OF OBLIGATIONS
Learning Outcomes: At the end of this module, you are expected to:
LEARNING CONTENT
Pure Obligation
An obligation whose performance does not depend upon a future or uncertain event, or upon a
past event or upon a past event unknown to the parties, demandable at once (NCC, Art. 1179).
One without a condition or a term (hence, demandable at once), provided there will be no
absurdity.
Examples:
a. I promise to pay you P 1million. [this is demandable at once, unless a period was really
intended, as when a loan has just been contracted (Floriano v. Delgado, 11 Phi.. 154), when
some time is reasonably necessary for the actual fulfillment of the obligation, as when a
person binds himself to pay immediately for the subscription of corporate shares of stock.
(Paul Schenker vs. William F. Gemperle, L-16449, August 31, 1962)]
The most distinctive characteristic of a pure obligation is its immediate demandability. This
quality, however, must not be understood in such a way as to lead to absurd interpretations
which would literally require the obligor or debtor to comply immediately with his obligation. A
distinction must be made between:
Conditional Obligation
Condition
A condition is an event which is future and uncertain, upon which the efficacy or extinguishment
of an obligation depends. It has two requisites: first, futurity; and second, uncertainty.
Suspensive Condition
A condition the fulfillment of which will give rise to the acquisition of a right. While the condition
has not arrived yet, in the meantime, the rights and obligations of the parties are suspended.
NOTE: In suspensive condition or condition precedent, the efficacy or the obligatory force is
subordinated to the happening of a “future and uncertain event”; if the suspensive condition
does not take place the parties would stand as if the conditional obligation never existed (Gaite
v. Fonacier, GR L-11827, July 31, 1961; Cheng v. Genato, 300 SCRA 722, GR 129760, December
29, 1998; Pineda, 2000).
WITHOUT
BASIS WITH DEBTOR’S FAULT
DEBTOR’S FAULT
A condition which requires a positive act on the part of the obligor that gives rise to the
acquisition of rights.
In case of a contract to sell, the obligation to deliver the subject properties becomes
demandable only upon the happening of the positive suspensive condition (payment of full
purchase price). Without full payment, there can be no breach of contract to speak of because
the seller has no obligation yet to turn over the title (Reyes v. Tuparan, G.R. No. 188064, June 1,
2011).
Resolutory Condition
A condition where the rights already acquired are lost upon fulfillment of the condition. It is also
known as condition subsequent.
SUSPENSIVE RESOLUTORY
BASIS CONDITION CONDITION
An act, which if not done, would give rise to a cause of action against the obligor. It
contemplates a situation where rights are already acquired but subject to an obligation, the
non- fulfillment of which does not affect the rights already acquired but merely gives a cause of
action in favor of the other party. In a contract of sale, the buyer‟ s non-payment of the price is
a negative resolutory condition. In such case, the seller has lost and cannot recover the
ownership of the property unless he takes action to set aside the contract of sale (Heirs of
Atienza v. Espidol, G.R. No. 180665, August 1, 2010).
Potestative Condtion
A condition which depends upon the will of one of the contracting parties (NCC, Art. 1182).
If the condition is potestative in the sense that its fulfillment depends exclusively upon the will
of the debtor, and the same is suspensive, both the condition and obligation are VOID.
However, if the condition is a pre-existing one or the condition is resolutory, only the condition
is void, leaving the obligation itself valid because what is left to the sole will of the debtor is not
the existence or the fulfillment of the obligation but merely its extinguishment.
If the condition is potestative in the sense that its fulfillment depends exclusively upon the will
of the creditor, the obligation shall be valid. This is so because the provision of the first sentence
of Art. 1182 extends only to conditions which are potestative to the obligor or debtor. Besides,
the creditor is naturally interested in the fulfillment of the condition since it is only by such
fulfillment that the obligation arises or becomes effective (Jurado, 2009 citing NCC, Art. 1181
and Manresa).
Casual Condition
It is the performance or the fulfillment of the condition which depends upon chance and/or the
will of a third person.
Mixed Condition
It is the performance or fulfillment of the condition which depends partly upon the will of a party
to the obligation and partly upon chance and or the will of a third person.
NOTE: Casual and mixed conditions are valid, unlike purely potestative conditions.
GR: Impossible conditions annul the obligation which depends upon the parties but not of a
third person.
XPNs:
1. Pre-existing obligation;
2. Obligation is divisible;
3. In simple or remuneratory donations;
4. In case of conditions not to do an impossible thing; and
5. In testamentary dispositions.
NOTE: In the foregoing, the obligations remain valid, only the condition is void and deemed to
have not been imposed. it is applicable only to obligations not to do and gratuitous obligations.
Obligations for whose fulfillment a day certain has been fixed, shall be demandable only when
that day comes (NCC, Art.1193).
A certain length of time which determines the effectivity or the extinguishment of the
obligations.
1. Future;
2. Certain; and
3. Possible, legally and physically (Paras, 2008).
“Day certain”
It is understood to be that which must necessarily come, although it may not be known when.
1. Ex die – This is a term or period with suspensive effect. The obligation begins only from a
day certain, in other words upon the arrival of the period.
2. In diem – A period or term with a resolutory effect. Up to a certain extent, the obligation
remains valid, but upon the arrival of said period, the obligation terminates.
3. Legal – A period granted under the provisions of the law.
4. Conventional or voluntary – The period agreed upon or stipulated by the parties.
5. Judicial – The period or term fixed by the courts for the performance of an obligation or
for its termination.
6. Definite – The exact date or time is known and given.
7. Indefinite – It is something that will surely happen but the date of happening is unknown.
e.g. “I will pay when my means permit me to do so.” When the debtor
When the debtor binds himself to pay when his means permit him to do so, the obligation is
deemed with a period (NCC, Art. 1180). This is valid because it is not the payment itself that is
dependent upon the will of the debtor, but the moment of payment.
As the time of payment is not fixed, the court must fix the same before any action for collection
may be entertained, unless, the prior action of fixing the term or period will only be a formality
and will serve no purpose but delay (Tiglao v. Manila RailroadCo., 98 Phil. 181, GR. L-7900,
January 12, 1956).
ALTERNATIVE OBLIGATIONS
Alternative obligation
It is one where the debtor is alternatively bound by different prestations but the complete
performance of one of them is sufficient to extinguish the obligation.
Facultative obligation
It is one where the debtor, who has a reserved right to choose another prestation or thing, is
bound to perform one of the several prestations due or to deliver a thing as substitute for the
principal.
Conjunctive obligation
One where the debtor has to perform several prestations; it is extinguished only by the
performance of all of them.
G.R: The right of choice belongs to the debtor XPN: Unless it has been
expressly given to the creditor (NCC, Art. 1200).
• The debtor must absolutely perform the prestation chosen. He cannot compel the
creditor to receive part of one and part of the other undertaking;
The choice made takes effect only upon communication of the choice to the other party and
from such time the obligation ceases to be alternative (NCC, Art. 1201; NCC, Art. 1205).
NOTE: The notice of selection or choice may be in any form provided it is sufficient to make the
other party know that the election has been made (Tolentino,2002).
NOTE: The choice made by the debtor does not require the concurrence of the creditor.
Otherwise, it would destroy the very nature of the right to select given to the debtor.
When choice is rendered impossible through the creditor‟ s fault, the debtor may bring an
action to rescind the contract with damages (NCC, Art. 1203).
Plurality of parties
When there are various debtors or creditors and the obligation is joint, the consent of all is
necessary to make the selection effective, because none of them can extinguish the entire
obligation.
If the obligation is solidary and there is no stipulation to the contrary, the choice by one will
binding personally upon him, but not as to the others. Thus, if A and B solidarily bind themselves
to deliver a horse or a carabao to C, the selection of A of the horse, when communicated to C will
REFERENCES
Soriano, Fidelito (2016). Notes in Business Law. Manila, Philippines: GIC Enterprises & Co., Inc.
Domingo, A. (2015). Obligations and Contracts; Laws, Principles, and Jurisprudence. Benguet,
Philippines: Coaching for Results Publishing
De Leon, Hector (2014). The Law on Obligations and Contracts. Manila: Rex Book Store