Phil 3. SJMS
Phil 3. SJMS
ON
PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
1
WEEK ONE
1. Introduction
All men by nature desire to know………an unexamined life is not worth living. The importance
of Education in one's life and society cannot be over emphasized. Philosophy and education are
two sides of the same coin as they play a complimentary role. Philosophy is theory while education
is the practical. Philosophy provides education with the theoretical framework needed in the
classroom.
In education, philosophy uses its tool of metaphysics, epistemology, and logic to address questions
about pedagogy, education policy, curriculum, as well as educational theory and practice. It
examines the definitions, goals, chains of meaning used in education by teachers or administrators
of policymakers. It studies what constitutes upbringing in education, the nature of the learner, role
of the teacher in influencing learning and method used by teachers in teaching processes. It also
questions why a learner cannot process what was thought and the factors involved in the learning
processes. Education plays a fundamental role in shaping individuals and societies. However, to
understand the purpose and nature of education, we must first explore philosophy—a discipline
that provides a framework for questioning and evaluating knowledge, truth, and values.
The word “philosophy” comes from the Greek words "philo" (love) and "sophia" (wisdom),
meaning "love of wisdom." Philosophy involves deep thinking about fundamental issues
concerning life, knowledge, morality, and reality.
2
• Logical reasoning: It seeks clarity and coherence in thoughts and arguments.
• Reflective inquiry: It involves thinking deeply about issues rather than accepting them at
face value.
• Universal relevance: It applies to various aspects of life, including politics, science, ethics,
and education.
Philosophy is not about memorizing facts but about asking “Why?”, “How?”, and “What if?”
This is especially important in education, where teachers and students must think critically about
knowledge and its application in real-life situations.
Education began in prehistory, as adults trained the young in the knowledge and skills deemed
necessary in their society. In pre-literate societies, this was achieved orally and through imitation.
Story-telling passed knowledge, values, and skills from one generation to the next. As cultures
began to extend their knowledge beyond skills that could be readily learned through imitation,
formal education developed. Schools existed in Egypt at the time of the Middle Kingdom. Plato
founded the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in Europe.
What is Education?
Education is the key to success, opportunities and societal advancement. It is also the engine room
and strength of a nation. Education frequently takes place under the guidance of educators also
known as teachers; however, learners can also educate themselves. Education can take place in
formal or informal settings. According to the first black president of South Africa, Dr.Nelson
Mandela, education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world. Thus,
we are able to shape a better society to live in by knowing and respecting rights, laws, and
regulations and live in harmony especially in this 21st century.
There is a general agreement among educationists and educators that education involves a
desirable change in human behaviour through the process of teaching and learning. This means
that a human being who exhibits undesirable behaviours from the point of view of the acceptable
3
societal norms cannot be adjudged an educated person, despite the fact that he had passed through
the four walls of an educational institution. The society, generally, expects a kind of change from
an educated person.
Education, as a process of initiating the child into cherished norms and skills, is designed and
implemented by the more matured or the adult members of the society to effect the desirable
changes in the younger ones, from one generation to the other. Fafunwa (1974) defined education
as what each generation gives to its younger ones, which makes them to develop attitudes, abilities,
skills and other behaviours which are of positive value to the society in which they live. This
position reflects the sociological perspective. Education, is a social service, provided world-wide
with multiple objectives in mind. The objectives vary from the acquisition of basic skills required
for a more rapid growth of the economy and the basic knowledge for the individual to function
effectively in the society.
Etymologically, education derived its meaning from two Latin words ‘educare’ and ‘educere’
respectively. The word ‘educare’ is interpreted to mean; to train or to form or to mould. Education
here seems to be sociologically biased. In other words, educare implies that the society trains,
forms or moulds the individual to achieve the societal needs and aspirations. This perspective of
education has little to consider on the natural potentialities of the individual child.
On the contrary, the word ‘educere’ is interpreted to mean: to build, to lead or to develop. This
perspective of the concept is mostly favoured by the humanists, who insist that the function of
education is to develop the natural potentialities in the child to enable him function in the society
according to his abilities, interest and needs. This perspective of the concept education is child-
centred, whereas the former is society-centred or subject matter-centred. From the ongoing
discussion, therefore, education could be understood to mean the total development of the
individual child, through acceptable methods and techniques, according to his abilities and
interests, as well as the needs of the society, to take his rightful place and contribute adequately to
the advancement of his society. (Amaele 2003). Generally, education is the instrument used for
the development of human beings in the cognitive, affective, psychomotor and psycho productive
domains. This is achieved through the process of teaching and learning.
4
3. The Relationship Between Philosophy and Education
Education is not just about acquiring skills and facts; it is about shaping individuals’ worldviews
and preparing them to contribute to society. Philosophy helps determine:
1. Defining Educational Goals – Philosophical ideas shape the aims of education. For
example, should education focus on personal growth, preparing workers for the economy,
or fostering moral values?
2. Shaping Teaching Methods – Philosophy influences whether teachers use rote learning
(memorization) or critical thinking approaches.
3. Determining Curriculum Content – What subjects should students learn? Should they
focus on science, the arts, or a mix of both?
4. Understanding the Role of the Teacher – Should teachers be authoritative figures or
facilitators who encourage students to think independently?
Thus, philosophy helps educators think critically about how they teach and how students learn.
5
4. Branches of Philosophy and Their Relevance to Education
Philosophy is divided into several branches, each with an impact on education. The main branches
are:
• Metaphysics deals with questions about what is real and the nature of existence.
• In education, it helps define what knowledge is important and what should be included
in the curriculum.
• Example: Should schools focus on teaching abstract subjects like mathematics and
philosophy, or should they emphasize practical skills like agriculture and technology?
Educational Application:
Educational Application:
• Rationalism (knowledge comes from reason) supports logic and critical thinking in
education.
• Empiricism (knowledge comes from experience) promotes hands-on learning.
6
4.3 Axiology (The Study of Values – Ethics and Aesthetics)
Educational Application:
Educational Application:
• Philosophy is the love of wisdom and involves critical thinking, reasoning, and deep
inquiry.
• Philosophy and education are closely related because philosophy shapes the goals,
methods, and content of education.
7
• Metaphysics helps define reality and what knowledge is important.
• Epistemology guides how students learn and acquire knowledge.
• Axiology determines the values and ethics in education.
• Logic ensures clear thinking and reasoning in learning.
Philosophy is essential to education because it provides a framework for understanding what and
how we teach. Educators who understand philosophy can make better decisions about curriculum
design, teaching methods, and student engagement.
WEEK TWO
8
1. Introduction
Schools of philosophy refer to distinct approaches or perspectives that thinkers use to examine
fundamental issues about reality, knowledge, and values. These schools influence education by
shaping what is taught, how it is taught, and why it is taught.
Definition:
9
• Idealism is based on the belief that ideas and knowledge are the ultimate reality.
• It emphasizes spiritual, intellectual, and moral development over material objects.
• Knowledge exists independently of human experience and must be discovered through
reasoning and reflection.
Key Proponents:
• Plato (427–347 BC) – Believed that reality is found in ideas rather than the physical world.
• Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) – Stressed the importance of the mind in shaping
knowledge.
Educational Implications:
• Curriculum: Focuses on subjects that develop the mind and moral character (e.g.,
philosophy, literature, religion).
• Teaching Methods: Encourages discussion, debate, and reflection rather than
memorization.
• Role of the Teacher: Acts as a moral and intellectual guide who helps students discover
truth.
• Role of the Student: Learns through reasoning and guided reflection.
Definition:
• Realism argues that the world exists independently of human thought and that
knowledge should be based on observation and experience.
• It emphasizes facts, logic, and scientific methods.
10
Key Proponents:
Educational Implications:
• Focuses too much on facts and ignores emotional and moral development.
• Can lead to rigid and standardized learning.
Definition:
Key Proponents:
Educational Implications:
11
• Teaching Methods: Uses project-based learning, hands-on activities, and group
discussions.
• Role of the Teacher: A facilitator who guides students in discovering solutions.
• Role of the Student: Actively participates in learning through experiments and practical
experiences.
Definition:
Key Proponents:
• Jean-Paul Sartre (1905–1980) – Believed that individuals create their own purpose in life.
• Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) – Stressed personal choice and faith.
Educational Implications:
• Curriculum: Flexible and focused on students' interests. Encourages subjects like art,
music, and creative writing.
• Teaching Methods: Uses self-directed learning, open discussions, and exploration.
• Role of the Teacher: A mentor who helps students discover their own values.
• Role of the Student: Actively explores personal beliefs and interests.
12
• Can be too unstructured.
• Some argue it does not prepare students for real-world expectations.
Focus on
Learns
observable Observation, Science, math, Subject
Realism through logic
facts and experimentation history expert
and facts
science
Learning Practical
Hands-on learning, Active
Pragmatism through knowledge, Facilitator
problem-solving participant
experience social sciences
Focus on Arts,
Self-directed Learns
personal humanities,
Existentialism learning, open Mentor through self-
meaning and personal
discussions discovery
freedom exploration
WEEK THREE
LEADING PHILOSOPHERS IN EDUCATION
1. Introduction
Education has been deeply influenced by the thoughts and writings of great philosophers
throughout history. These philosophers explored questions such as:
13
• What is the role of the teacher in learning?
• How should society educate its citizens?
By studying their ideas, we can understand the foundations of modern education and how
different educational philosophies have shaped teaching and learning practices.
Socrates was a Greek philosopher from Athens, widely regarded as the father of Western
philosophy. He did not write down his ideas; instead, his thoughts were recorded by his students,
particularly Plato. Socrates lived during a time of political instability in Athens and was ultimately
sentenced to death for allegedly corrupting the youth and questioning traditional beliefs.
• The chaotic political situation in Athens led him to question truth and morality.
14
• He believed that true wisdom comes from questioning rather than blindly accepting
authority.
• He rejected rote learning and emphasized critical thinking and self-examination.
Implications on Education
Practical Examples
• Law schools and philosophy classes often use the Socratic Method to develop reasoning
skills.
• Modern classroom discussions and debates are influenced by Socratic questioning.
• Socrates did not write any books, but his student Plato recorded his ideas in:
o The Apology (Socrates' defense before his trial)
o The Republic (explores justice and education)
Plato was a student of Socrates and the teacher of Aristotle. He founded The Academy, one of
the first formal institutions of higher learning in the Western world.
15
Influences on His Thoughts
• Socrates’ ideas inspired him to believe that knowledge is discovered through reasoning.
• He was influenced by political instability in Athens and sought to create a just society.
• He believed that education shapes the moral character of individuals.
• Proposed the Theory of Forms, where true knowledge exists beyond the physical world.
• Advocated for a structured education system based on talent and ability.
• Believed in lifelong learning, especially for rulers and philosophers.
Implications on Education
Practical Examples
Biography
Aristotle was a student of Plato and the tutor of Alexander the Great. He founded The Lyceum,
where he emphasized empirical research and observation.
16
Influences on His Thoughts
• Unlike Plato, Aristotle believed that knowledge comes from experience and observation.
• He was influenced by the natural world and the study of biology, physics, and ethics.
Aristotle believed that the purpose of education was not just to fill your head with facts, but to
shape your character. In his book “Nicomachean Ethics”, he talks about virtue—being a good,
moral person—as the highest goal of life. So, the aim of education, in his view, was to help people
become virtuous citizens.
Think of a young boy who loves sweets. If he eats too many, he gets sick. But if he learns
moderation—eating just enough to enjoy without harm—he is developing a virtue. Aristotle saw
education as a way to teach people these life-balancing skills: courage, honesty, kindness, patience,
and wisdom.
He believed these virtues were not inborn, but learned through habit. And who teaches these
habits? Parents first, then teachers.
Aristotle said, “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.”
He saw the early years of a child's life as a golden time to build good habits. If you teach a child
to share, be respectful, and think before acting, they grow into adults who naturally live that way.
Just like learning to ride a bicycle, Aristotle believed learning starts with doing things again and
again, until they become second nature. So, he emphasized practice and routine in education.
17
3. Education Should Match the Stages of Life
One of Aristotle’s most powerful ideas was that people learn differently at different ages. He
divided life into three main stages:
• Early Childhood (up to 7 years): This is the time for learning basic habits, like obedience,
cleanliness, and play. Children at this stage learn best through imitation—they copy what
they see.
• Youth (7 to 21 years): This is when the mind starts to open up to reason. Here, children
can begin to study logic, mathematics, and science. But they also need strong moral
guidance.
• Adulthood (21 and above): Now, people can explore philosophy, ethics, and deep
thinking. They are ready to reflect on life and make wise decisions.
Imagine trying to teach algebra to a toddler—it wouldn’t work. But if you teach them to count
cookies, they’ll understand numbers naturally. Aristotle's age-based approach made sure education
followed the natural development of the human mind.
For Aristotle, a healthy mind and a healthy body go together. He stressed that education must
include physical training as well as mental growth. He admired balance.
Think of a student who only reads books all day but never plays or exercises. Aristotle would say
this person is missing half of life. He supported gymnastics and sports in schools because they
taught discipline, courage, and teamwork.
This idea lives on today in physical education classes, sports teams, and the value we place on
exercise.
18
5. Education for the Good of Society
Aristotle believed that education wasn’t just personal—it was political. A well-educated person
contributes to a better society. He wrote that “The citizen should be molded to suit the form of
government under which he lives.” In other words, education should prepare people to become
responsible citizens.
For example, in a democracy, education should teach people how to think critically, debate, vote
wisely, and respect different views. In this way, education builds not just individuals, but whole
communities.
Aristotle made a clear difference between liberal education—which is about thinking, reasoning,
and understanding the world—and vocational training, which is about learning a trade or skill.
He believed that liberal education was the higher goal because it prepared people to live wisely
and make moral choices. But he didn’t completely ignore practical skills; he just thought they were
not enough on their own.
It’s like knowing how to build a house versus knowing how to make a home filled with love and
beauty. The first is skill; the second is wisdom.
Unlike his teacher Plato, who believed in learning through pure thought, Aristotle believed that all
knowledge starts with the senses. We learn by seeing, hearing, touching, and then thinking about
what those experiences mean.
He was a keen observer of nature—watching how animals behave, how plants grow, how people
talk and live. He encouraged students to look closely at the world around them and ask questions.
19
If a child sees water turning into vapor when boiled, and then asks “why?”—that’s pure Aristotle.
Curiosity plus observation equals learning.
Aristotle saw the teacher not as someone who forces knowledge into students but as someone who
guides them gently, helping them discover truths for themselves.
Even though he lived over 2,000 years ago, Aristotle’s educational ideas are still alive today.
Modern systems that emphasize:
• Character education
• Age-appropriate learning
• Physical education
• Civic education
• Critical thinking
• Inquiry-based learning
When a teacher helps a student not just pass a test but also become a better human being, that’s
Aristotle at work. When we teach our kids to ask why and not just accept answers blindly, we’re
carrying his torch.
20
Aristotle once said, “Educating the mind without educating the heart is no education at all.” And
that may be the greatest lesson of all. His philosophy teaches us that education is not just about
books and exams—it’s about becoming fully human.
Whether you’re a teacher, a parent, or just someone trying to grow, Aristotle’s message is simple
and deep: Learn with purpose. Live with virtue. Grow with wisdom.
Implications on Education
Practical Examples
Biography
John Dewey was an American philosopher and educator who championed experiential learning.
He believed that education should focus on problem-solving, creativity, and social engagement.
Born in 1859 in Vermont, USA, Dewey grew up at a time when education was all about discipline,
memorization, and obedience. But Dewey saw a different vision. He believed that learning should
be active, joyful, practical, and above all, connected to real life. His ideas reshaped how schools
operate around the world—even to this day.
21
Influences on His Thoughts
Most people think school is a place you go to get ready for life—like a waiting room. But Dewey
believed school should be a part of life right now. He wanted children to solve real problems, work
on real projects, and experience the world through their learning.
Example:
Instead of reading about farming in a textbook, a Dewey-style class might grow vegetables in a
school garden. Children would measure soil quality (science), calculate plant growth (math), write
about their experience (language arts), and discuss food systems (social studies).
By doing real things, students learn not just facts, but also how to think, question, and act in the
real world.
For Dewey, learning wasn’t about sitting still and listening—it was about doing. He called this
approach experiential learning.
22
Children are naturally curious. Give them tools and a problem to solve, and they’ll jump right in.
Dewey believed teachers should provide hands-on activities that connect with students’
experiences.
Example:
Instead of memorizing the definition of gravity, children might drop objects of different weights
and observe what happens. From there, they’d explore why the heavier object doesn’t fall faster.
This builds not just knowledge, but understanding.
Before Dewey, schools were teacher-centered—the teacher was the boss, and students obeyed.
Dewey flipped this idea.
"The child is the starting point, the center, and the end."
This doesn’t mean letting kids do whatever they want. It means that lessons should start from the
child’s interests, needs, and questions.
Example:
If a child is fascinated by trains, a teacher might design lessons around transportation—bringing
in math (timing), geography (maps), history (railroads), and language (stories about travel).
This approach keeps children engaged and makes learning feel relevant and exciting.
In Dewey’s world, the teacher isn’t a ruler on a throne handing out knowledge. Instead, the teacher
is a guide—someone who helps students explore, think, and reflect.
23
He believed that teachers should observe, ask questions, suggest ideas, and provide materials—
but let students make discoveries on their own.
Example:
Instead of lecturing about how seeds grow, a teacher might ask, “What do you think would happen
if we planted this bean in sand instead of soil?” Then, they’d help the children explore, observe,
and record the results.
Dewey wasn’t just an educator; he was a philosopher of democracy. He believed that schools were
the heart of a democratic society.
"Democracy must be born anew in each generation, and education is its midwife."
In his view, schools should teach not just reading and math—but also how to be a good citizen.
That means learning how to:
• Listen to others
• Work in groups
• Respect different opinions
• Make decisions together
Example:
In a Dewey-inspired classroom, students might vote on class rules or work in groups to solve
problems. This teaches responsibility, cooperation, and leadership.
6. Integration of Subjects
Dewey didn’t like breaking education into isolated parts—like science at 10am, math at 11am, and
reading at noon. He wanted learning to be integrated, like in real life.
24
Example:
Let’s say students are studying a local river. They can:
This approach makes learning more meaningful because it reflects the way we use knowledge in
the real world.
7. Reflective Thinking
Dewey saw thinking as the heart of education. Not just memorizing—but asking, analyzing, and
reflecting.
He called it reflective thinking—pausing to consider what we know, what we don’t, and how to
solve problems.
This is the foundation of critical thinking, a skill more important than ever today.
25
8. Education and Social Change
Dewey believed that schools could help build a better, fairer world.
He saw education as a way to fight inequality, promote understanding, and prepare students to fix
the problems they see around them.
For Dewey, schools weren’t just places to learn—they were places to dream, grow, and build a
brighter future.
Even though Dewey lived over a hundred years ago, his ideas still shape education today. Every
time a teacher:
Schools that focus on project-based learning, collaboration, creativity, and student voice are
walking in Dewey’s footsteps.
John Dewey didn’t believe in dusty classrooms or silent students. He believed in a school that was
alive—full of curiosity, laughter, questions, experiments, teamwork, and discovery.
He taught us that education isn’t just about tests or textbooks—it’s about becoming thoughtful,
capable, and caring human beings.
26
If you’ve ever learned something by doing it yourself—if you’ve ever asked “why?” and searched
for the answer—then you’ve lived a little bit of Dewey’s dream.
Implications on Education
Practical Examples
• Democracy and Education (argues for education as a tool for social progress)
• Experience and Education (discusses learning through experience)
3. Conclusion
The ideas of leading philosophers have shaped education across centuries. Their diverse
perspectives provide valuable insights into modern teaching methods, curriculum design, and
student engagement. By understanding their contributions, educators can develop effective and
meaningful teaching strategies for today’s learners.
Picture a grand French estate in the 1500s, surrounded by vineyards and gardens. Inside a tower,
a thoughtful man sits among shelves of books, writing quietly. His name? Michel de Montaigne.
And though he wasn’t a formal teacher or philosopher like Aristotle or Dewey, his thoughts on
education became some of the most powerful ideas ever written on the subject.
27
Montaigne believed that education wasn’t about stuffing facts into a child’s head. Instead, it was
about shaping a thoughtful, wise, and truly human person—someone who could think clearly,
act justly, and live well.
In Montaigne’s day, schools were obsessed with memorization. Children would spend hours
copying Latin texts, chanting phrases, and trying to remember every rule.
But Montaigne disagreed. He believed that the purpose of education was not to fill the mind with
words, but to shape the soul.
For Montaigne, education should awaken curiosity, build judgment, and help a person live wisely.
He wanted students to learn how to think, not just what to think.
Example:
Imagine a child memorizing the definition of honesty. That’s not enough. Montaigne would ask:
Does the child understand why honesty matters? Can they tell a story where honesty changed
someone’s life? Do they practice honesty themselves? That’s true learning.
Montaigne loved conversation. He believed that we learn best not by being lectured to, but by
talking things out, asking questions, and debating ideas.
He criticized teachers who talked too much and students who only listened.
“We can be knowledgeable with other men's knowledge, but we cannot be wise with other men's
wisdom.”
28
He wanted teachers to engage students—to ask them what they think, to challenge their views,
and to encourage independent thinking.
Example:
Rather than telling a student “war is bad,” Montaigne would say, “What do you think causes war?
Can war ever be justified? How would you solve conflict without violence?” That’s how minds
grow.
Though Montaigne loved books (his library was his treasure), he didn’t believe they were the only
way to learn. He believed life itself is the best teacher.
Example:
A student studying courage shouldn’t just read about brave knights or generals. They should face
real-life challenges: stand up for a friend, speak in front of others, or admit a mistake. That’s how
true courage is learned.
Montaigne believed each child was unique, with their own mind, heart, and pace of learning. A
good teacher should adapt to the child—not force every child into the same mold.
“It is the custom of schoolmasters to beat their pupils, but I do not approve of this.”
He was far ahead of his time in rejecting harsh discipline. He believed learning should be gentle,
respectful, and joyful, not fearful or painful.
29
Example:
Imagine a boy who struggles with reading but loves animals. Instead of punishing him for his
reading troubles, Montaigne might suggest giving him books about animals. Let his interest lead
the learning.
This was one of Montaigne’s strongest ideas: that critical thinking is more important than rote
learning.
He warned that many students could recite facts but had no idea how to use them. He said such
students were like parrots—no understanding, just noise.
“I would rather have my son learn to judge well than to speak well.”
For him, a good student should be able to reason, compare, question, and make sound decisions.
Example:
A child may learn the dates of battles. But Montaigne would ask: Why did that war happen? Could
it have been avoided? Who was affected? What does that teach us today?
This kind of thinking creates not just scholars—but wise human beings.
Montaigne believed education should not only train the mind, but also the body and soul. He
valued physical activity and moral development as part of learning.
He advised that children should play, move, explore nature, and learn through their senses. He also
thought they should be taught virtue, empathy, and good judgment.
30
Example:
A day in Montaigne’s ideal school might include outdoor walks, storytelling, games, reflection
time, and thoughtful conversation—not just dusty books.
For Montaigne, a teacher wasn’t just someone who knows more—they were someone who lives
well. He believed students learn more from what teachers do than what they say.
He wanted teachers to model honesty, humility, and kindness. He also believed they should keep
learning themselves.
“Let the master not merely teach, but let him also learn.”
Example:
A teacher who admits they don’t know something and explores the answer with the class is doing
exactly what Montaigne admired—showing that learning is a lifelong journey.
Montaigne wasn’t impressed by fancy words or showy displays of knowledge. He believed that
real education helps us become better people—not just look smart.
He disliked prideful scholars who boasted of what they knew but lacked wisdom, humility, or
compassion.
Example:
If someone can quote all the great philosophers but treats people rudely, Montaigne would say
they are uneducated in the heart—and that is the true failure.
31
Montaigne’s Legacy Today
Montaigne’s ideas are still alive in modern education movements that focus on:
• Critical thinking
• Child-centered learning
• Socratic dialogue
• Moral education
• Experiential learning
• Holistic development
His gentle, thoughtful, and deeply human vision of education reminds us that teaching is not
about perfection—it’s about connection.
Montaigne didn’t write a textbook. He didn’t design a school system. But in his beautiful essays,
he left behind something even greater: a vision of education that respects the child, values the
heart, and teaches us how to live wisely.
He reminds us that the goal of education is not just to pass exams or earn degrees—but to grow in
wisdom, kindness, and joy.
"Let us make the child’s soul not just learned, but good."
In today’s noisy, fast-paced world, Montaigne whispers a gentle truth: education, at its best, is a
quiet conversation between life and the soul.
32
2.6 The Educational Ideas of Friedrich Wilhelm Froebel
Imagine a sunny room filled with singing, laughter, building blocks, and colorful paper. There are
no long lectures, no memorization drills. Instead, children are playing—and through that play,
they’re learning everything from counting to compassion.
This isn’t just a dream classroom. It’s the vision of Wilhelm Froebel, the German educator who
created the concept of kindergarten—literally “children’s garden.”
Born in 1782 in Germany, Froebel saw education not as a system of pressure and tests, but as a
gentle unfolding of a child’s inner world. He believed each child was a seed, and the role of
education was to nourish that seed so it could grow into its full potential.
The word kindergarten means "garden of children." Froebel chose this word very carefully. He
believed that, just like plants, children need the right environment to grow.
Froebel’s kindergarten was a place filled with beauty, nature, love, songs, and play. It wasn’t
about preparing children for exams. It was about preparing them for life.
Example:
Instead of sitting at desks, children in Froebel’s kindergarten might water plants, build towers with
blocks, and sing songs together. Each activity helped them grow socially, emotionally, physically,
and intellectually—all at the same time.
33
In his time, many adults thought play was something silly or unimportant. But Froebel saw play
as a child’s work—a natural and powerful way to explore the world, express feelings, and solve
problems.
Example:
When a child pretends to run a store, they’re learning math (prices), language (communication),
creativity (imagination), and social skills (taking turns). Froebel believed every playful moment
was a building block for a well-rounded human being.
Froebel didn’t just talk about play—he created tools to make it powerful. These tools were called
Gifts and Occupations.
• Gifts were simple objects like balls, cubes, sticks, and rings—each meant to teach concepts
like shape, form, movement, and beauty.
• Occupations were activities like drawing, cutting, weaving, and modeling clay.
These weren’t toys to distract children—they were tools for understanding the world.
Example:
A child exploring wooden blocks might learn symmetry, balance, and spatial awareness. Another
child folding paper might discover geometry and art. Froebel believed these small, hands-on
activities helped children build both their minds and their hearts.
Froebel had a deep spiritual belief that everything in life is connected—nature, humanity,
mathematics, music, art, and God. He believed education should reflect this unity.
34
He taught that every subject is part of a larger whole, and that learning should show children the
beauty and harmony of the world around them.
Example:
A lesson about leaves might involve:
This integrated approach helps children feel like they’re part of something meaningful and
wonderful.
Before Froebel, most people thought serious learning began at age 7 or later. But Froebel insisted
that the earliest years of life are the most important.
He saw children as naturally good and full of potential, and he believed it was society’s job to
support that potential from the very beginning.
This idea changed the world. It led to the creation of early childhood education programs that
value the learning that happens from birth to age six.
35
6. Learning Through Self-Activity and Creativity
Froebel didn’t want passive children who memorized facts. He wanted children who acted,
created, and discovered for themselves.
He believed children learn best when they’re active participants, not just receivers of information.
Example:
A child learns about triangles not by hearing a definition, but by folding paper into shapes, noticing
the triangle, and discovering its properties through touch and observation.
These weren’t extras—they were essential parts of growing a full, joyful human being.
Froebel saw teachers not as strict authorities, but as gentle guides—like gardeners helping plants
grow.
A good teacher, Froebel said, watches the child, learns what they need, and gently offers the right
environment and materials for their growth.
Example:
If a child loves building, the teacher might offer new materials to build with. If another child is
quiet and shy, the teacher might tell stories to draw them out gently.
36
Froebel emphasized respecting each child’s individuality, and giving them time and space to
grow at their own pace.
Froebel deeply valued nature. He believed that being outdoors—touching soil, watching animals,
feeling the seasons—helped children understand the rhythms of life.
He also believed that learning about nature connected children to something bigger than
themselves—a spiritual presence, a sense of wonder.
Example:
Planting a seed in the ground wasn’t just science. It was a lesson in patience, care, responsibility,
and the miracle of life. Froebel saw God’s wisdom in every flower and blade of grass.
Froebel’s ideas inspired not just kindergarten but the entire field of early childhood education.
His influence can be seen in:
• Montessori schools
• Waldorf education
• Reggio Emilia approach
• Play-based learning worldwide
Anytime a teacher encourages creativity, respects a child’s pace, or lets children learn through
play, Froebel is smiling in the background.
37
Conclusion: The Gentle Genius Who Planted a Movement
Wilhelm Froebel didn’t invent worksheets, tests, or grade levels. He invented something far more
beautiful: a space where children can grow, explore, imagine, and become themselves.
He saw childhood not as a waiting room for adulthood, but as a sacred, magical time of life.
His teachings remind us that every child is a seed. With love, nature, play, and care, that seed will
blossom into a strong, kind, and thoughtful human being.
And in every joyful kindergarten, in every laughing classroom filled with blocks, songs, and
sunlight—Froebel lives on.
Imagine a classroom where children move freely, choose their own work, and quietly concentrate
with joy. You might hear soft chatter, see a child pouring water from one jug to another, another
tracing letters in sand, and a third helping a younger friend tie their shoelaces.
This is a Montessori classroom. And it all began with Maria Montessori, the Italian doctor-
turned-educator who gave the world a new way of seeing children.
Born in 1870, Montessori broke many boundaries—she was the first female physician in Italy and
became one of the most influential educators in history. She believed children are not empty
vessels to be filled, but full human beings with enormous potential.
Maria Montessori saw every child as a natural learner, filled with curiosity and ready to explore
the world. She believed that education should be built around the child, not the teacher.
38
“The child is both a hope and a promise for mankind.”
In traditional classrooms of her time, teachers gave orders and children followed. But Montessori
flipped the script: The child leads; the adult follows.
Example:
Instead of giving all children the same math lesson, Montessori allowed each child to choose a
math activity suited to their level—maybe counting beads, building number chains, or working
with sandpaper numbers.
Montessori believed children learn best when they touch, move, and engage their senses. She
created beautiful materials to help children learn through experience—not just memorization.
Example:
The Pink Tower—a stack of ten pink cubes—helps children understand size, order, balance, and
coordination. As they stack and restack, they are building math, spatial, and fine motor skills—all
through play.
Montessori called this “sensorial education” because it awakens the senses and the mind at once.
39
3. The Prepared Environment
One of Montessori’s most brilliant ideas is the “prepared environment.” She believed the
classroom should be carefully arranged to invite learning.
“The environment must be rich in motives which lend interest to activity and invite the child to
conduct his own experiences.”
In a Montessori classroom:
• Everything is child-sized
• Materials are placed on low shelves
• The room is calm, clean, and orderly
• Children can move freely and choose their work
Example:
A tiny broom leans next to a tiny dustpan. A child who spills rice knows exactly where to go to
clean it up—no adult needed. This setup teaches responsibility, independence, and respect for their
space.
Montessori classrooms give children freedom—but not chaos. Children choose their own
activities, work at their own pace, and move freely. But they also learn respect for others, rules,
and routine.
“To let the child do as he likes when he has not yet developed any powers of control is to betray
the idea of freedom.”
Montessori believed that true freedom comes from self-discipline and self-respect, which children
develop naturally when they are trusted and guided gently.
40
Example:
A child may choose any work on the shelf, but they must use it properly, return it when finished,
and not disturb others.
One of Montessori’s most powerful discoveries was the idea of the “absorbent mind.” She
noticed that from birth to around age 6, children learn effortlessly—like little sponges soaking up
language, culture, movement, and emotion.
She said this period is critical for shaping the foundation of a child’s personality and intellect.
Example:
Think of how a baby learns a language—no lessons, no grammar books, just by listening and
absorbing. Montessori said education should work with this natural process, not against it.
Montessori observed that children go through “sensitive periods”—windows of time when they
are especially interested in certain things, like order, language, movement, or small objects.
During these periods, children learn those things with joy and ease.
“The child is truly a miraculous being, and this should be felt deeply by the educator.”
Example:
A two-year-old who constantly lines up toys or closes boxes may be in a sensitive period for order.
Instead of stopping them, Montessori encouraged teachers to support this urge and give more
activities that allow for organizing and sorting.
41
7. Independence and Self-Discipline
She believed that children gain confidence and intelligence when they are allowed to do things
on their own.
Instead of doing tasks for the child, the adult should show how and then step back.
Example:
Rather than tying a child’s shoes every day, Montessori would teach the child slowly how to tie
them—and provide a practice board if needed—so that they could eventually do it without help.
Montessori saw teachers as guides or observers, not as the center of attention. Their job was to
watch the child carefully, understand their needs, and support their natural development.
“The greatest sign of success for a teacher is to be able to say, ‘The children are now working as
if I did not exist.’”
This means stepping back when the child is focused, offering help only when needed, and trusting
the child’s inner teacher.
Example:
If a child is quietly working with counting beads and making progress, the teacher wouldn’t
interrupt. They might smile, take a note, and gently offer the next step when the child is ready.
42
9. Peace Education and Global Citizenship
Montessori lived through two world wars, and she believed education had a vital role in creating
peace.
She taught children to care for each other, respect diversity, and solve problems with kindness.
She also believed in teaching about the wider world—continents, cultures, animals, and
environments.
Example:
In a Montessori class, you might see children from different cultures learning together, using maps,
singing songs from around the world, and talking about kindness and fairness.
Montessori’s influence is global. Her methods are used in more than 140 countries and have
inspired schools, parenting styles, and even companies like Google and Amazon (whose founders
were Montessori kids!).
• Child-led learning
• Empathy and peace
• Hands-on education
• Respectful teaching
43
Conclusion: A Quiet Revolution of Love and Learning
Maria Montessori saw something extraordinary in every child: a natural power to grow, to learn,
to care, and to lead.
She believed education was not preparation for life—it was life.
She left us with a message that still rings true today: if we create schools where children are
respected, nurtured, and free to explore, we will raise a generation of confident, compassionate,
and capable human beings.
“Free the child’s potential, and you will transform the world.”
And that, perhaps, is the heart of Montessori education: not just teaching children facts—but
giving them the tools, the space, and the love to become their best selves.
Imagine a classroom not just filled with books, desks, and teachers—but with meaning, dignity,
purpose, and the quiet question: What does it mean to be human?
That question was at the heart of everything Jacques Maritain believed about education. He
wasn’t just interested in helping students pass exams or get jobs. He wanted education to awaken
the full human spirit—to develop people who are wise, free, kind, and aware of their
responsibilities to others and to God.
Born in 1882 in France, Maritain was a philosopher and a deeply spiritual thinker. Though he
studied science and reason, his heart turned toward philosophy, ethics, and Catholic thought,
especially under the influence of St. Thomas Aquinas. His educational ideas were rooted in
human dignity, freedom, truth, and the common good.
Let’s now explore his key educational ideas, each one like a stepping stone on the path to becoming
fully human.
44
1. Education is for the Whole Human Person
He believed that education should develop all the faculties of a human being:
This idea is called integral humanism—it’s about forming a complete, well-rounded person.
Example:
In Maritain’s view, a good school would teach not only math and science but also ethics, arts,
spirituality, physical well-being, and social responsibility. It wouldn’t just ask, “What do you
know?” but “Who are you becoming?”
Maritain saw every human being—regardless of race, religion, status, or ability—as sacred and
priceless. He believed each person was created in the image of God and deserved to be treated
with dignity.
“The purpose of education is to guide the human person in the process of becoming fully
human.”
45
Because of this, education must never be used to control, manipulate, or standardize people. It
should uplift, respect, and awaken freedom and purpose.
Example:
A child who struggles in reading should not be labeled or pushed aside but taught with care and
respect, recognizing that their worth is not tied to grades. Their soul, Maritain would say, matters
more than their score.
Maritain believed that true education prepares people not to obey blindly, but to choose wisely.
He called this education for freedom.
Freedom, for Maritain, didn’t mean doing whatever you want. It meant:
Education should shape people to be moral agents, not just skilled workers.
Example:
A student who learns to think critically about history, culture, and justice becomes a citizen who
can vote thoughtfully, speak up for others, and live with integrity. That’s the freedom Maritain
believed in.
46
4. The Role of Reason and Faith
Maritain didn’t believe that science and religion had to be enemies. In fact, he taught that reason
and faith are like two wings of the human spirit.
“A true education must serve the truth, which is both philosophical and spiritual.”
He believed that schools should allow room for spiritual development, especially helping
students ask big questions:
Why are we here?
What is good?
What is the meaning of suffering, love, or hope?
Example:
In a Maritain-inspired school, students might study biology and theology, math and morality,
poetry and philosophy—because every part of life connects to truth.
For Maritain, character formation was just as important as academic achievement. He said
education must cultivate:
• Honesty
• Compassion
• Justice
• Responsibility
• Love
47
He believed that knowledge without ethics can lead to greed, cruelty, or even war. But when guided
by love, knowledge becomes a tool for peace and healing.
Example:
A student who learns economics should also learn about poverty, generosity, and fairness—so they
use their skills to build a better society, not just to get rich.
Maritain believed education should prepare people not just for private success, but for public
service. He said we are all part of a human community, and we must learn to care for one another.
“The purpose of education is to form men and women who will serve the common good.”
• Human rights
• Citizenship
• Global justice
• Peace and cooperation
Example:
Instead of raising students who only care about their own careers, Maritain wanted schools to
produce doctors who heal the poor, lawyers who defend the innocent, teachers who uplift the
weak, and leaders who work for peace.
Every person has a unique calling—a vocation, Maritain said. Education should help each child
discover who they are meant to be, not force everyone into the same mold.
48
“Education must respect the mystery and destiny of the individual.”
Some students may become artists. Others, scientists or farmers or parents or poets. What matters
is that they grow into their true self.
Example:
A student who loves music shouldn't be forced to become an engineer just because it’s more
“practical.” Education should help that child develop their gift, because every true vocation serves
the world in some way.
Maritain had great respect for teachers. But he believed they must be more than instructors—they
must be witnesses to truth, beauty, and virtue.
“The teacher must awaken in the student a love of truth and a desire to serve it.”
Example:
A history teacher doesn’t just tell facts but asks students to wrestle with questions of justice,
courage, and legacy—guiding them not just to knowledge, but to wisdom.
49
• Catholic schools
• Human rights education
• Moral education in public schools
• Global education efforts that honor dignity and justice
His ideas live on in classrooms that prioritize the whole child, respect freedom, and seek to unite
reason, love, and spirit in education.
Jacques Maritain believed that true education is an act of love—not a business, not a factory, not
a competition. He saw each child as a soul in formation, a future citizen of earth and heaven.
“To educate a man in mind but not in morals is to educate a menace to society.”
In our world of fast facts and flashing screens, Maritain’s voice still whispers something ancient
and true: Educate the whole person. Teach with love. Build for peace. And never lose sight of
the soul.
50
WEEK FOUR
THE RELEVANCE OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION TO THE STUDENT-
TEACHER
Every great teacher was once a student—curious, confused, and full of questions. And at the heart
of every good education system lies not just facts and formulas, but a foundation of thinking. That
is where philosophy steps in.
51
teaching and learning. For student-teachers, understanding educational philosophy is crucial
because it shapes the way they think, teach, and interact with learners. It helps them ask:
• Why do I teach?
• What should I teach?
• How should I teach?
• What is the ultimate goal of education?
This lecture will explore how philosophy of education is relevant to student-teachers in both
theory and practice, using real-life classroom scenarios to demonstrate its importance
Many people go into teaching because they like children or want a stable job. But without
understanding why we educate, teaching becomes mechanical.
52
Practical Example:
Imagine a student-teacher preparing a lesson on Nigerian history. A purely technical approach
would involve listing dates and events. A philosophically informed teacher, however, might ask
students:
“Why do we study our past? What does this history say about us today? How can we avoid
repeating our mistakes?”
Every teaching style is based on a philosophical orientation, whether the teacher knows it or not.
For student-teachers, studying philosophy helps them:
Realism (Aristotle) Facts, order, natural laws Use of experiments, structured lessons
53
Practical Example:
A student-teacher influenced by John Dewey’s pragmatism would encourage students to
investigate local environmental issues, collect samples from nearby rivers, and suggest
community solutions—instead of just reading about pollution in a textbook.
Philosophy of education gives student-teachers the tools to understand and apply ethics in their
classrooms. Issues like: Fairness in grading, respecting students’ rights, Avoiding favoritism, and
Handling conflicts peacefully. It sensitizes the student-teacher to ethical dilemmas in the
classroom:
With a strong philosophical base, the student-teacher makes decisions not based on fear or
popularity, but moral reasoning.
Practical Example:
A student-teacher in northern Nigeria faces a challenge where only boys are expected to speak in
science class. A philosophically grounded teacher will reflect:
“Is silence for girls ethical? What kind of society am I reinforcing?”
And then, they create equal participation policies in their classroom.
Philosophy helps the student-teacher move from being a transmitter of facts to being a facilitator
of understanding, an awakener of thought, and a role model.
54
Through philosophy, the teacher becomes aware of:
Practical Example:
A teacher from a minority ethnic group may struggle with low self-esteem in a diverse school.
Studying Sartre’s existentialism helps them understand that identity is self-chosen, and they
can shape who they become as a teacher.
Curricula are not neutral. They reflect social values, ideologies, and power structures. Philosophy
of education teaches the student-teacher to interpret the curriculum with a critical lens.
Practical Example:
In a lesson about nutrition, a student-teacher introduces local foods (like ogbono and millet)
instead of only talking about European diet models. They realize that curriculum should meet
learners where they are.
Effective classroom management is not just about rules. It’s about relationships, fairness, and
purpose. Philosophy teaches the student-teacher to see discipline as a moral act.
55
Different philosophies lead to different discipline styles:
Practical Example:
In handling a disruptive student, a philosophy-aware teacher won’t just yell or send them out.
They might say, “Let’s talk after class. What’s going on?”—acknowledging the student’s human
dignity and inviting growth.
Practical Example:
A student-teacher in a mixed religious school, inspired by Ubuntu philosophy (“I am because
we are”), makes sure that classroom prayers are inclusive, or replaced by moments of silence.
Philosophy trains the student-teacher to be a lifelong learner and not just someone who finishes
teacher training and stops growing.
It promotes:
• Continuous questioning
• Journaling and reflection
• Openness to new methods
• Critical review of one’s teaching
56
Practical Example:
A student-teacher reflects after a tough day and writes:
“Today I shouted too much. Maybe I didn’t prepare enough. Next time, I’ll use group activities
instead of just talking.”
The teacher is not just a classroom worker. The teacher is a change-maker, a builder of future
citizens.
Practical Example:
A student-teacher in a school where girls are discouraged from football starts a “Girls’ Play
Day”—not because it’s in the syllabus, but because it’s the right thing to do.
Conclusion
Philosophy of education is the soul of teaching. For the student-teacher, it is the mirror, the map,
and the motivation. It teaches:
57
Philosophy of education is not just theory; it is a toolkit for the professional teacher. For student-
teachers, it: clarifies the goals and values of education, shapes teaching methods and classroom
ethics, encourages creativity, critical thinking, and moral responsibility, helps make learning
practical, inclusive, and meaningful. When student-teachers embrace philosophy, they no longer
just teach subjects; they teach human beings. Without philosophy, a teacher becomes a robot.
With philosophy, a teacher becomes a torchbearer.
58