PAPER 29
PAPER 29
To cite this article: Theo Dimitriadis & Henk Smeijsters (2011) Autistic spectrum disorder and
music therapy: theory underpinning practice, Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 20:2, 108-122,
DOI: 10.1080/08098131.2010.487647
Faculty of Health and Care, KenVak Research Centre, Zuyd University of Applied
Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
(Received 20 April 2009; final version received 4 March 2010)
The autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) has been and still is a major arena
for practice in music therapy; arguably it is the client group with which
music therapy has the highest reputation. Whether we talk about practice
based evidence or evidence based practice, music therapy clinicians and
researchers are nowadays more and more frequently required to provide
theoretical and scientific evidence, which explains (or attempts to explain)
not only how but also why music works as a therapeutic medium with this
particular client group. Autistic individuals very often demonstrate a
significant interest in music and its components: rhythm, pitch, harmony,
or timbre; they seem to be more able to communicate through sound,
whereas they tend to avoid other kinds of interaction, for instance tactile
contact. In this paper the authors attempt to give possible explanations on
why music can be such a unique tool for the treatment of the autistic
individual. Theories from different fields, such as developmental
psychology, neuropsychology, musicology, and psychotherapy have been
put together in order to find a bridge between theory and practice. The
paper underlines the necessity for workable theories which are tailored to
the needs of music therapy practice. Suggestions for future theory building
work on this particular client group are offered.
Keywords: music therapy; theory; analogy; autism (ASD); vitality
affects; core consciousness; core-self
It has been more than 30 years since the first publication of this book
and without doubt many things have changed in the field of research on
music therapy and autism. Numerous studies have been published since then
on the same subject (Brown, 1994; Pavlicevic, 1997; Robarts, 2000; Oldfield,
2006a; Poismans, 2008), most of which involved case studies, qualitative
studies and expert opinions. Following the model of the Evidence Based
Medicine (EBM),1 music therapy research on ASD has been enriched in the
last few years by a number of quantitative studies: (among others) a
randomized controlled trial – RCT (Kim, Wigram, & Gold, 2008, 2009), a
systematic review (Gold, Wigram, & Elefant, 2006) and a meta-analysis
1
Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) aims to apply the best available evidence gained
from the scientific method to medical decision making. It seeks to assess the quality
of evidence of the risks and benefits of treatments (including lack of treatment)
(Timmermans & Mauck, 2005, 18–28).
110 T. Dimitriadis and H. Smeijsters
(Whipple, 2004). Despite their questionable applicability to the music
therapy practice, these studies can be a useful reference point for the
clinicians who are often required to provide ‘‘good’’ evidence2 on the effects
of music therapy. Music therapy has inevitably become more and more
science based; it remains, however, a developmental, musical, and inter-
personal process (Pavlicevic, Ansdell, Procter, & Hickey, 2009) which can
contribute to the social and emotional integration of a person with an ASD.
Apart from the evidential support, the validation of a treatment, such as
music therapy, must be without doubt respectful to theories about why
music can be a powerful therapeutic tool for the autistic client’s treatment.
This paper focuses on the theoretical background, which is there to support
what happens in the musical relationship between therapist and autistic
individual. The authors attempt to go beyond the ‘‘traditional’’ music
therapy literature and seek answers to the question ‘‘why music therapy can
be effective with ASD’’ in the fields of developmental psychology,
neuropsychology, and psychotherapy. Moreover, the ideas of the music-
centred music therapists, who propose a musicological model to help
understanding what happens in the musical interaction, are also presented in
this paper.
2
An example of the comparison between ‘good’ and ‘less good’ evidence is presented
in the following Evidence Hierarchy (Kuiper et al., 2008). The ‘least prestigious’
evidence is, according to the list, an expert’s opinion:
When it is possible to describe music with the same dynamic kinetic terms
as surging, fading away, crescendo, drawn out and so on, which have been
used by Stern when describing vitality affects, then we may conclude that
this explains why there is analogy between musical and psychological
processes. When it is possible to describe the musical and psychological
processes by means of the same dynamic terms, the analogies between
musical forms and forms of feeling are apparent. (Smeijsters, 2005, p. 70)
112 T. Dimitriadis and H. Smeijsters
It is worth noting here that, although a large portion of the vitality affects can
be described in musical terms, they are beyond musical concept.3 It is because of
the vitality affects that music has such an impact on us (Stern, 2009). Vitality
forms are regarded as ‘‘a feeling domain unto itself’’ and not as phenomena that
belong to any specific modality (auditory, visual, etc.) or to any specific domain
(e.g. emotions, cognitions, sensations, or motivations).
Trevarthen’s description of intersubjectivity is very close to Stern’s affect
attunement. Intersubjectivity is the psychological ability to have and share
purposes, interests, and emotions, to be ready to exchange these intrinsic
psychological events with other persons, so as to gain new ideas and goals
from them (Aitken & Trevarthen, 1997, quoted in Trevarthen, 2002).
Similar to Stern, Trevarthen has written on the infant musicality and the
musical qualities of mother–infant communication. Trevarthen and Malloch
(2009, p. 8) state that the engagement of the musicality of an autistic
individual by another can be ‘‘a lifeline to human society.’’ The theory of
communicative musicality entered the literature of developmental psychology
(Malloch, 1999) in an attempt to explain the foundations of sympathetic
action between communicating human beings. Trevarthen suggests that this
theory has enriched our understanding of what interpersonal awareness or
intersubjectivity is (Trevarthen, 2002, p. 88). It might help us ‘‘perceive the
problems faced by a confused and withdrawn autistic individual in a busy
and impatient human world’’:
. . . we live, think, imagine and remember in movement. To capture the essence
of movement and its values we use the metaphor ‘‘musicality’’. To recognise
that our experience in movement is shared by a compelling sympathy we call
this activity ‘‘communicative’’. We believe that our learning, anticipating and
remembering, our infinite varieties of communication including spoken and
written language, are all given life by our innate communicative musicality.
(Trevarthen & Malloch, 2009, p. 9)
3
D. Stern personally announced this during the Sixth Nordic Music Therapy
Conference in Aalborg, Denmark.
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 113
4
According to Damasio (1999) feelings and emotions are not exactly synonyms:
feelings are inwardly directed and private, whilst emotions are outwardly directed and
public. It is through feelings that emotions begin their impact on the mind, but the
full and lasting impact of feelings requires consciousness, because ‘‘only along with
the advent of a sense of self do feelings become known to the individual having
them’’ (Damasio, 1999, p. 36).
5
According to Stern (1995) a present moment ‘‘. . . contains the essential elements to
compose a lived story. This is a special kind of story, because it is lived as it happens,
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 115
non-verbal and non-cognitive. Therefore it can be better expressed in
another medium, other than language. Communication through the use of
sounds involves a different means of interacting, which is far from the
‘‘realms’’ of language. An autistic individual, who, as noted at the beginning
of this study, often has problems with distinguishing the meanings of
language, might find him/herself more at ease in a situation where the use of
language is minimized to the absolutely necessary. As a result, music therapy
approaches the potential changes in the autistic client’s life from a totally
different angle, than verbal therapy does.
Stern’s parameters of the vitality affects, such as tempo, rhythm,
intensity, shape, crescendo, and decrescendo, are the quintessence of the
musical interaction between therapist and client. Smeijsters’ theory of
analogy describes the connection between these vitality affects and music. He
proposes that playing, singing, and listening to music sounds the inner
psyche of the client who plays, sings/vocalizes and listens to music. In music
therapy the client expresses his/her inner self in music. The client doesn’t
only ‘‘tell’’ a story about him/herself : he is him/herself in music. The music
therapist meets the client in his/her music and then aims to change his/her
forms of feeling by changing his/her musical forms (Smeijsters, 2003, pp. 71–
85).
There is an analogy between being in music and being in the experience.
Active or creative music therapy takes place in the experience, in the present
moment, and involves the core-self/core consciousness. The scope of creative
(or active) music therapy is the same with that of the core-self: the here and
now. Interacting In the medium of music, thus in a non-verbal way, is a
representation of how the client interacts Out of the medium, as well as an
auditory indication of what happens in the client’s core-self in the present
moment. Therefore, changes in the core-self might be influenced by changes
in the musical medium.
When, for instance, a client with an ASD rigidly repeats the same
rhythm or melody all the time, the behavior in music sounds his/her ‘‘inner’’
compulsion (behavioral motif). The music therapist can help him/her accept
and imitate slight changes in rhythm or melody, in order to experience new
musical motifs (Smeijsters, 2005, p. 73). We believe, therefore, that the
experience and ‘‘discovery’’ of new motifs in the medium, thus in the musical
interaction, can bring about changes in the life of the autistic client out of the
medium. The music therapist offers the client the opportunity to experience
new motifs of feeling in the here-and-now musical interaction. These
processes involve the conscious, non-cognitive, and non-verbal core-self of
the client (Smeijsters, 2008a). Through experiencing new motifs of feeling,
not as it is put into words afterwards. It is non-verbal and need not be put into
words, even though it could be with difficulty . . . it is made up mostly of feelings that
unfold, a sort of untold emotional narrative’’ (p. 55).
116 T. Dimitriadis and H. Smeijsters
the client also experiences new behavioral motifs. One of the most important
goals of music therapy with any client group is without doubt to give the
client the opportunity to ‘‘experience the different’’ and incorporate
potential changes in his/her everyday life.
Music therapists often find close connections between Stern’s mother-
and-child affect attunement and the music therapy relationship. The
therapist attunes to the sounds of the client and, according to the goals of
therapy, gives a musical response, which is similar to the mother–infant
interaction, as described previously by Stern and Trevarthen. In her work
with autistic children Schumacher (2001) also relates the musical interaction
between therapist and autistic child to the interaction between mother and
child. She developed an assessment scale, similar to the Nordoff–Robbins’s
one (1977, 2004), which makes it possible to assess the levels of attunement
in the musical interaction, particularly when working with autistic
individuals. Schumacher (1994, quoted in Oldfield, 2006b) refers to two
stages in music therapy work with children with an ASD. In the first phase
she establishes contact with the child by putting the child’s spontaneous
movements, vocalizations, and percussion playing into a musical context. In
the second stage she establishes communication through engaging in a form
of playful exchange.
Stern’s description of mother–infant games as vitality affects relate easily
to Nordoff and Robbins’ concept of interactive music therapy, which is
responsive to the timing and expressive quality of each patient’s initiative.
Referring to the well known case study of Edward, a boy with ASD,
Nordoff and Robbins (1977) state that:
. . . the music accepts and meets his state, while it matches, accompanies and
enhances his expression. (p. 99)
Can a music-centered theory underpin the practise without the need for
psychological thinking?
Not all music therapists agree with the idea of building a music therapy
theory based on evidence from psychology and psychotherapy. Music-
centred therapists present a more alternative way to conceive and monitor
music therapy that rejects neuroscientific, psychodynamic or developmental
theories as irrelevant to music as a cultural activity.
There is a growing body of literature (Lee, 1996, 2003; Ansdell, 1995,
2003), which suggests that it is possible to provide safe therapeutic
encounters without reference to non-music derived theory (Streeter, 1999),
and that music therapy theory should preferably spring from an under-
standing of creative musical processes alone. Ansdell (1995) claims that an
extra-musical theory tends to delete the object (the music) while a
musicological one deletes the subject (the player or listener). Colin Lee’s
approach of ‘Aesthetic Music Therapy’ (2003) puts less (or no) emphasis on
the psychological thinking, and rejects the developmental or psychodynamic
interpretations of the musical relationship. There is no need to go back to
the mother–infant relationship to explain the process of music therapy with
autistic clients, or with any clients. What is important is to be able to live
and experience the musical interaction in the here and now; otherwise the
118 T. Dimitriadis and H. Smeijsters
focus of attention moves away from the musical component of music
therapy.
According to this school of thinking, many music therapists’ initial use
of Stern and Trevarthen’s work tended to reduce music in music therapy to
just preverbal proto-music (Pavlicevic & Ansdell, 2009). Stige (2003, 2004)
very eloquently writes that:
. . . no person moves directly from protomusicality to musicking. Musicking,
based on human protomusicality, involves appropriation of music as culture.
(Stige, 2003, p. 173)
Conclusion
According to Smeijsters (2003, 2008a, 2008b), arts therapies should develop
theories that are art based: consequently music therapy should develop
music based theories. Nevertheless ‘‘these theories should be supported by
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 119
psychological and psychotherapeutic evidence, because arts therapies are
meant to ameliorate handicaps’’ (Smeijsters, 2003, p. 72). The ambition of
creating a ‘‘General Music Therapy Theory,’’ such as the Theory of Analogy,
didn’t seem to gain acceptance from all schools of thinking in music therapy.
Bonde (2003) writes that such a theory underestimates the importance of the
aesthetic form or musical meaning:
Music therapists who work with clients with an ASD might agree that
any kind of sounds may be used in order to establish communication
channels with a withdrawn or isolated autistic individual. It is, thus, not the
aesthetically meaningful that invites the client to join the musical
interaction; it is the communicatively meaningful, which doesn’t necessarily
sound musically pleasant. In addition, as Smeijsters has stated elsewhere:
. . . a theory of aesthetics cannot explain why music influences personal
experience . . . the aesthetic feeling is therapeutic if it changes the inner self and
the social self . . . it is too simplistic to describe music therapy in purely musical
terms. (2008b, pp. 19–23)
Music therapy takes place in the here and now and can engage the
autistic client’s core-self because it is non-verbal and non-cognitive,
therefore it doesn’t depend on the intelligence level of the client. It might
also cause changes to the background feelings that influence the behavior
and emotional world of an autistic individual. That happens because in the
musical interaction the vitality affects, as described by Stern, play a
significant role in the non-verbal therapeutic relationship. The experience of
different musical motifs corresponds to the experience of different emotional
and behavioral motifs because of the (previously described) analogy between
the musical and the psychological.
It might be interesting for future theory building work to analyze how
particular music styles influence the background feelings of the autistic
client. In addition, if a skilled music therapist has to be able to detect these
background feelings (for instance client’s wellness or imbalance), would that
have anything to do with the psychoanalytically oriented counter-
transference (i.e. the therapist’s own feelings and thoughts for the client,
based on their therapeutic relationship)?
It is common practice for music therapists to record and audit the
sessions with clients on the autistic spectrum. Thinking and planning are
necessary before and especially after the music therapy session. In Damasio’s
120 T. Dimitriadis and H. Smeijsters
terms, thinking, planning, wording, and reviewing belong to the area of the
extended consciousness; arguably, a music therapist has to be able to shift
between his/her core and extended consciousness in order to communicate
with and suggest changes to the client’s core-self. Furthermore, current
practitioners need to base their treatment on widely recognized theories,
often borrowed from the realms of developmental psychology and
neuropsychology. The music therapist has to be convincing enough to the
parents/carers of the client and especially to other professionals, who
sometimes see music therapy as just a nice activity. Music therapy theories
built on the scientific and practise based evidence can be extremely useful for
the therapist who quite often struggles to prove that what happens in the
musical interaction with the client is objectively effective and far from just
therapeutic intuition or wishful thinking.
A strictly music-centered thinking seems helpful, but not enough to
cover the vast range of the interpersonal communication, both conscious
and unconscious. However, recent developments in music-centered music
therapy, such as the Community Music Therapy, might help researchers and
theorists look at the music as a cultural/social event, rather than exclusively
a dyadic mother–infant interaction. It appears that the greatest difficulty lies
in the fact that music therapists have no choice but to use words in order to
describe something that is beyond words; they need to use language for
something that happens beyond language; they must use cognition, which
according to Damasio belongs to the extended consciousness, in order to
describe experiences in music which aim at or involve the core-self of the
client. Damasio (1999) suggested that language is the translation of
something else: the translation of the very experience in the present
moment. This very experience, the musical give-and-take, should be the
cornerstone of any attempts to explain the power of music with the
communicatively disabled client with ASD.
Notes on contributors
Theo Dimitriadis, Music Therapist (N-R), student at the Master of Arts Therapies
Program, at Zuyd University of Applied Sciences.
Prof. Dr Henk Smeijsters, Head of Research of the KenVaK Research Centre for the
Arts Therapies, and Head of Studies of the Master of Arts Therapies at Zuyd
University of Applied Sciences.
References
Aldridge, D. (1996). Music therapy research and practice in medicine: From out of the
silence. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Alvin, J. (1978). Music therapy for the autistic child. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ansdell, G. (1995). Music for life. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Ansdell, G. (2003). The stories we tell: Some metatheoretical reflections on music
therapy. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 12(2), 152–159.
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 121
Asperger, H. (1944). Die ‘autistischen psychopathen’ im kindesalter. Archiv fur
Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 117, 76–136.
Bonde, L.O. (2003). Analogy – a core concept. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy,
12(1), 69–70.
Brown, S. (1994). Autism and music therapy: Is change possible, and why music?
Journal of British Music Therapy, 8(1), 15–25.
Condon, W.S., & Ogston, W.D. (1966). Sound film analysis of normal and pathological
behavior patterns. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 143(4), 338–347.
Damasio, A.R. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens. London: Harvest Books.
Damasio, A.R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain.
Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
Gold, C., Wigram, T., & Elefant, C. (2006). Music therapy for autistic spectrum
disorder. The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. Art No.:
CD004381. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004381.pub2.
Howlin, P. (1998). Children with Autism and Asperger syndrome: A guide for
practitioners and carers. Chichester: Wiley.
Humphrey, N., & Parkinson, G. (2006). Research on interventions for children and
young people on the autistic spectrum: A critical perspective. Journal of Research
in Special Education Needs, 6(2), 76–86.
Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.
Kim, J., Wigram, T., & Gold, C. (2008). The effects of improvisational music therapy
on joint attention behaviors in autistic children: A randomized controlled study.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1758–1766.
Kim, J., Wigram, T., & Gold, C. (2009). Emotional, motivational and interpersonal
responsiveness of children with autism in improvisational music therapy. Autism,
13(4), 389–409.
Kuiper, C., Verhoef, J., Cox, K., & de Louw, D. (2008). Evidence based practice voor
Paramedici: Methodiek en Toepassing. Utrecht: Lemma.
Lee, C. (1996). Music at the edge. London: Routledge.
Lee, C. (2003). The architecture of aesthetic music therapy. Gilsum, NH: Barcelona.
Malloch, S. (1999). Mothers and infants and communicative musicality. Rhythms,
Musical Narrative, and the Origins of Human Communication. Musicae Scientiae,
Special Issue, 1999–2000 (pp. 29–57). Liège: European Society for the Cognitive
Sciences of Music.
Nordoff, P., & Robbins, C. (1977). Creative music therapy. New York, NY: John Day.
Nordoff, P., & Robbins, C. (2004). Therapy in music for handicapped children.
Gilsum, NH: Barcelona.
Oldfield, A. (2006a). Interactive music therapy in child and family psychiatry – clinical
practice, research and teaching. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Oldfield, A. (2006b). Interactive music therapy – a positive approach. London: Jessica
Kingsley.
Pavlicevic, M. (1997). Music therapy in context: Music, meaning and relationship.
London: Jessica Kingsley.
Pavlicevic, M., & Ansdell, G. (2009). Between communicative musicality and
collaborative musicing: A perspective from community music therapy. In S.
Malloch & C. Trwvarthen (Eds.), Communicative musicality (pp. 357–376).
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pavlicevic, M., Ansdell, G., Procter, S., & Hickey, S. (2009). Nordoff–Robbins music
therapy (Research Department): Presenting the Evidence. Retrieved from http://
www.nordoff-robbins.org.uk/musicTherapy/research/index.html
Poismans, K. (2008). Samen Lachen. In H. Smeijsters (Ed.), De kunsten van het
leven:voorbelden uit de creatieve therapie. Diemen: Veen Magazines.
122 T. Dimitriadis and H. Smeijsters
Robarts, J.Z. (2000). Clinical and theoretical perspectives on poietic processes in
music therapy, with reference to Nordoff and Robbins’ case study of Edward.
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 8(2), 192–199.
Robbins, C. (2004). Case Study Presentations (during N-R postgraduate diploma
training course). London, Nordoff Robbins Music Therapy Centre.
Schumacher, K. (2001). The physical-emotional development within music therapy
of children suffering from severe contact deficiencies. In Music-Emotion-Therapy
2001: Music and Medicine (pp. 34–41). Vienna: H. von Karajan Centre.
Smeijsters, H. (2003). Forms of feeling and forms of perception: The fundamentals of
analogy in music therapy. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 12(1), 71–85.
Smeijsters, H. (2005). Sounding the self: Analogy in improvisational music therapy.
Gilsum, NH: Barcelona.
Smeijsters, H. (2008a). Handboek Creatieve Therapie. Bussum, NL: Uitgeverij
Coutinho.
Smeijsters, H. (2008b). In defence of the person – limitations of an aesthetic theory of
music therapy. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 17(1), 19–24.
Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and
developmental psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Stern, D. (1995). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York,
NY: Norton.
Stern, D. (2009). The issue of vitality. Keynote presentation during the 6th Nordic
Music Therapy Congress, Aalborg, Denmark.
Stige, B. (2003). Elaborations towards a notion of community music therapy.
Unpublished PhD dissertation. Department of Music and Theatre, University
of Oslo.
Stige, B. (2004). Community music therapy: culture, care and welfare. In M.
Pavlicevic & G. Ansdell (Eds.), Community music therapy (pp. 91–113). London:
Jessica Kingsley.
Streeter, H. (1999). Finding a balance between psychological thinking and musical
awareness in music therapy theory – a psychoanalytic perspective. British Journal
of Music Therapy, 13(1), 5–20.
Thompson, E. (1996). The mindful body, embodiment and cognitive science. In M.
O’Donovan-Anderson (Ed.), The incorporated self. New York, NY: Rowman
and Littlefield.
Timmermans, S., & Mauck, A. (2005). The promises and pitfalls of evidence-based
medicine. Health Affairs (Millwood), 24(1), 18–28.
Trevarthen, C. (2002). Autism, sympathy of motives and music therapy. Enfance
2002/1, 54, 86–99.
Trevarthen, C., Aitken, K., Papoudi, D., & Robarts, J. (1998). Children with autism:
diagnosisand interventions to meet their needs (2nd ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Trevarthen, C., & Malloch, S. (2009). The origins and psychobiology of musicality.
In S. Malloch & C. Trevarthen (Eds.), Communicative musicality (pp. 1–9).
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whipple, J. (2004). Music in intervention for children and adolescents with autism: a
meta-analysis. Journal of Music Therapy, 41(2), 90–106.
Wigram, A. (2000). Contact in music: The analysis of musical behaviour in children
with communication disorder and pervasive developmental disability for
differential diagnosis. In T. Wigram & J. De Backer (Eds.), Clinical applications
in developmental disability, paediatrics and neurology (pp. 69–92). London: Jessica
Kingsley.
Wigram, T. (2004). Improvisation. London: Jessica Kingsley.