Diagnosis, Therapy, and Evidence High-Quality Download
Diagnosis, Therapy, and Evidence High-Quality Download
Visit the link below to download the full version of this book:
https://medipdf.com/product/diagnosis-therapy-and-evidence/
A British Cataloging-in-Publication record for this book is available from the British Library
No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic
or mechanical, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written
permission from the publisher. Please contact Rutgers University Press, 100 Joyce Kilmer
Avenue, Piscataway, NJ 08854–8099. The only exception to this prohibition is “fair use” as
defi ned by U.S. copyright law.
Preface ix
List of Abbreviations xi
Notes 199
Index 243
vii
Preface
Americans are besieged by advice about the efficacy of medical therapies and
drugs as well as behavioral and dietary modifications that will presumably
prevent disease, promote health, and extend longevity. Scarcely a day passes
without revelations about new medical breakthroughs that will presumably
overcome the ravages of age-old diseases. Faith in medical progress leads the
United States to spend far more than any other industrialized nation on its
health care system. Yet such health care indicators as longevity, infant mor-
tality, access to care, and the effective management of chronic illnesses lag far
behind other nations. Indeed, the claim that the United States has the world’s
best health care system belies the facts.
In this book we have collaborated across disciplinary lines and present
a series of case studies to illustrate gaps and weaknesses in the medical care
system. One of us (Grob) is a medical historian and the other (Horwitz) is a
medical sociologist. Both of us, however, share assumptions and beliefs that
transcend disciplinary lines, and we have produced an analytic work that
hopefully sheds light on a series of contemporary medical issues. We have
found that a substantial part of the contemporary literature dealing with
therapeutic efficacy, diagnoses, epidemiology, and evidence ignores longitu-
dinal and historical data, to say nothing about methodological inadequacies
and claims that rest largely on faith. Our goal in writing this book, however,
is not to denigrate the medical care system. It is rather to call attention to
some of its weaknesses and exaggerated claims that lead to dubious thera-
peutic and behavioral interventions and exacerbate the excessive costs of
both care and treatment.
We would like to thank William Rothstein, Janet Golden, and Doreen
Valentine, who provided valuable suggestions on an earlier draft of the manu-
script. Naomi Breslau and Jerry Wakefield made many astute recommenda-
tions regarding the PTSD chapter. Part of the material in chapters 2 and 3
is taken from Grob’s “The Rise and Decline of Tonsillectomy in Twentieth-
Century America,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 62
(October 2007): 383–421, and “The Rise of Peptic Ulcer, 1900–1950,” Perspec-
tives in Biology and Medicine 46 (autumn 2003): 550–566. Both are reprinted
with the permission of Oxford University Press and the Johns Hopkins
ix
x Preface
Gerald N. Grob
Allan V. Horwitz
Abbreviations
xi
Diagnosis, Therapy, and Evidence
Chapter 1
Most Americans believe that their health care system is the best in the world.
Yet they do not recognize the extent to which many claims about the causes of
disease, therapeutic practices, and even diagnoses are shaped by beliefs that
are unscientific, unproven, or completely wrong. To so argue is not to con-
demn American medicine, which admittedly has many strengths, but rather
to point to rhetorical claims and practices that rest upon shaky foundations.
What we have chosen to do in this book is to present a series of case studies
that illustrate the weaknesses of many prevailing beliefs and therapies. In so
doing we can not only learn from these examples, but fi nd ways to do better
in the future.
1
2 Diagnosis, Therapy, and Evidence
was in part a reflection of the fact that more and more people were enjoying
greater longevity.
To be sure, the decline in mortality from infectious diseases preceded
antibiotic drug therapy. Yet the introduction of these and other drugs after
World War II reshaped both medical practice and public perceptions. If
infectious diseases could be conquered by antibiotic drugs, why could not
long-duration diseases also be eliminated by new medical therapies? Slowly
but surely Americans, for a variety of reasons, came to believe that the medi-
cal care system could play a crucial role in conquering disease and extend-
ing longevity.
Yet Americans manifest ambivalent and even contradictory attitudes
about their health care system. They take it as an article of faith that a sci-
ence-based system has the capacity to reduce morbidity and mortality and
thereby improve the quality of their lives. They point with pride to a health
establishment that in their eyes is superior to that of any other nation. They
believe that medical schools turn out the best-trained physicians; that a vast
hospital system with its array of imposing technologies provides the most
up-to-date therapies; and that pharmaceutical companies have the capacity to
develop innovative drugs that both treat and prevent disease.
Beneath the surface, however, there is considerable unease. Constantly
rising health expenditures remain a source of concern. Millions of Ameri-
cans lack health insurance and many are forced into bankruptcy because of
huge medical bills resulting from various illnesses. The increasing bureau-
cratization of the medical care industry has diminished the element of trust
between patient and physician, giving rise to fears that doctors do not always
act in the best interest of patients. There is concern that insurance compa-
nies, in an effort to contain costs, shape treatment protocols in ways that are
in their fi nancial interests. Faith in medical therapies is tempered by fi nd-
ings that question their efficacy as well as by the prevalence of iatrogenic
diseases (illnesses induced inadvertently by a physician, surgeon, or health
care professional, or by any medical treatment or diagnostic procedure, or
from a harmful occurrence that was not a natural consequence of the patient’s
disease). Distrust of the pharmaceutical industry is widespread because of
revelations that harmful side effects of drugs are sometimes hidden, that
the efficacy of many drugs is exaggerated, and that fi nancial relationships
with physicians have adverse consequences for patients. After an explosion
of psychotropic drug use during the 1990s and early years of the twenty-fi rst
century, controversies have arisen about their effectiveness, negative side