4508
4508
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-education-change-and-
society-4th-revised-edition-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/textbook-society-and-
technological-change-8th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-education-and-social-
change-5th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-education-and-society-
canadian-perspectives/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/original-pdf-learning-and-
teaching-in-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-education-3rd-revised-
edition/
(eBook PDF) The Schooled Society: An Introduction to
the Sociology of Education 4th Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-the-schooled-society-an-
introduction-to-the-sociology-of-education-4th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-teachers-schools-and-
society-a-brief-introduction-to-education-5th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/teachers-schools-and-society-a-
brief-introduction-to-education-5th-edition-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-multicultural-education-
in-a-pluralistic-society-11th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-financing-education-in-
a-climate-of-change-12th-edition/
title: WEL_ECAS_4e_09763_CVR format: 248mm x 204mm spine: 25mm CMYK
EDUCATION,
understand what is valued in our society, and how ‘winners
and losers’ are created. Life outcomes of the results gained by
young people at various points in their education have broad
consequences at both a social and an individual level.
CHANGE AND
This book will help students understand how the Australian
MOCKLER
CONNELL
WELCH
system has been shaped over time, and how this has influenced
the current institutions and policies that comprise the state of
SOCIETY
education today.
HAYES
PROCTOR
SRIPRAKASH
• Updated introductory vignettes include a scenario that
illustrates one or more of the key themes of the chapter,
demonstrating how the content is relevant to situations that
teachers may face.
• Increased attention to the Australian Professional Standards
BAGNALL
VICKERS
FOLEY
for Teachers to help students transition into their profession.
• Increased content on assessment, including critical responses
4TH EDITION
to modes of assessment.
ANTHONY WELCH
• Completely revised Chapter 14, exploring ways to conduct
GROUNDWATER-SMITH
LOW
BURNS
research, and the implications of adopting one research RAEWYN CONNELL, NICOLE MOCKLER, ARATHI SRIPRAKASH, HELEN PROCTOR, DEBRA HAYES,
framework or another. DENNIS FOLEY, MARGARET VICKERS, NIGEL BAGNALL, KELLIE BURNS, REMY LOW, SUSAN GROUNDWATER-SMITH
• More content on Early Years and the educational contexts of
young children.
• Introduction expanded to incorporate more on Ways of
Seeing in sociological terms to help students learn how to
think in sociological ways.
ISBN 978-0-19-030976-3
9 780190 309763
visit us at: oup.com.au or
contact customer service: [email protected]
8 GENDER 228
Remy Low & Kellie Burns
Introduction 229
Sex 232
Gender 243
Sexuality 254
Conclusion 258
11 CURRICULUM 333
Nicole Mockler
Introduction: does Australia have a national curriculum? 333
What is curriculum? 335
Approaches to curriculum design 335
Curriculum: the big questions 336
From intended to enacted curriculum 338
Teachers and curricular decision-making 339
Differentiating and negotiating the curriculum 342
Curriculum in Australia 344
Conclusion: teachers and curriculum work 354
12 TEACHERS 361
Nicole Mockler & Raewyn Connell
Introduction: images of teachers 361
Teachers’ daily work 363
The teaching workforce 369
Teaching as an occupation 371
Wages and conditions 374
13 GLOBALISATION 388
Nigel Bagnall
Introduction 389
What is globalisation? 389
Historical background and theories of globalisation 391
Australia in the global marketplace 397
International educational standards 399
International curriculum 400
Conclusion 403
Debra Hayes is an Associate Professor in the Sydney School of Education and Social Work at
the University of Sydney. She is co-author of Literacy, Leading and Learning: Beyond Pedagogies
of Poverty, and Re-imagining Schooling for Education: Socially Just Alternatives. Her research
concerns inequities in education and how these are constituted by schooling discourses and teaching
practices. Debra works closely with school and system-based educators in the public system, as well
as community-based workers and organisations. A former secondary school science teacher, she is
working with Craig Campbell on a biography of Jean Blackburn.
Dennis Foley is Professor in the School of Management, University of Canberra and has
published across a range of disciplines in humanities and management. His work reviews the
education of Indigenous Australians within Australian settler society, advocating the inclusion
of an Indigenous epistemology and pedagogy. A Fulbright Scholar, he studied the links between
education, microeconomic reform and improved life chances. He has held postdoctoral
fellowships at the Australian National University’s Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy
Research and the National Centre for Indigenous Studies. Books include Repossession of Our
Spirit and Successful Indigenous Australian Entrepreneurs.
Margaret Vickers is Emeritus Professor of Education at the University of Western Sydney.
She is co-author of Refugee and Immigrant Students: Achieving Equity in Education and
Crossing Borders: African Refugees, Teachers and Schools. Her research focuses on social justice
issues, gender, early school leaving and youth in transition. Margaret began her working life
as a secondary school teacher, and her career includes senior appointments in the Australian
public service and the Paris-based OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development).
Nigel Bagnall is an Associate Professor in the School of Education and Social Work, University
of Sydney. A respected researcher in the field of international education, his teaching in
international schools led to a doctorate on the International Baccalaureate (University of
Melbourne, 1994). His books include Youth Transition in a Globalised Marketplace (2005),
International Schools as Agents for Change (2008), Education and Belonging (2011) and Global
Identity in Multicultural and International Educational Contexts (2015). An initiator and original
author of the first edition of Education, Change and Society (2007), he has published in Spanish,
French and Portuguese.
Kellie Burns is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Education and Social Work, University
of Sydney. Her research and teaching focus on the intersections of gender, sexuality, sexual
health, citizenship, media cultures and schooling. She is co-author of Mediating Sexual
Citizenship: Neoliberal Subjectivities in Television Culture (2017).
Remy Low has been a secondary social science teacher, a lecturer and tutor in Gender and
Cultural Studies, and an academic advisor for youth transitioning into higher education
in western Sydney. He is currently a Lecturer in the School of Education and Social Work,
University of Sydney. His teaching and research draw on critical theories and historical inquiry
to explore contemporary policies and practices in education, with a particular focus on issues of
identity and difference.
Susan Groundwater-Smith is Honorary Professor in the School of Education and Social Work,
University of Sydney. Her work has focused on the ways in which teachers may engage with
research in the interests of improved practice and how they may be supported in this endeavour.
Exemplified in her co-authored publication, Facilitating Practitioner Research, she has given
additional attention to procedures by which children and young people may make a significant
contribution to educational research. Related books include Participatory Research with
Children and Young People (2015) and Engaging with Student Voice in Research, Education and
Community: Beyond Legitimation and Guardianship. A summary of her academic development
can be found in From Practice to Praxis: A Reflexive Turn (2017).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
All the authors thank the anonymous readers of the original book proposal and chapters. Their
suggestions and positive responses were much appreciated. We also thank Oxford University Press
for its support for the project.
Thanks too to Craig Campbell for final checks of most chapters. All the authors acknowledge
and thank their undergraduate and graduate students over many years who have engaged with
their teaching, especially those who have boldly told them when a particular approach has or has
not worked. This book would not exist without you.
The author and the publisher wish to thank the following copyright holders for reproduction
of their material.
Allen & Unwin for the quote on pp. 130−31 from Connell, R. W., Ashenden, D. J., Kessler,
S. & Dowsett, G. W. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division, Sydney:
Allen & Unwin, pp. 141–3. Quote on pp.164−65 is from ‘An opportunity to tackle the
complex issues behind violence’ by Anne Davies, The Sydney Morning Herald, 19 December
2005, this work has been licensed by Copyright Agency Limited (CAL), except as permitted
by the Copyright Act, you must not re-use this work without the permission of the copyright
owner or CAL. Springer for the quotes on pp.246−47 republished with permission of Springer
Science and Bus Media B V, from ‘Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of feminine body
comportment motility and spatiality’. Human Studies, 3(1), 137–56, pp. 146−7; pp. 153−154;
permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Taylor and Francis Ltd for the
quote on p.9−10 from Bottrell, D. (2007). ‘Resistance, resilience and social identities: Reframing
‘problem youth’ and the problem of schooling’. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(5), 605. Reprinted by
permission of the publisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd, http://tandfonline.com). UNSW Press for
the quote on p. 104 from Gibson, K. & Cameron, J. (2005), ‘Building community economies in
marginalised areas’, in P. Smyth, T. Reddel, & A. Jones (Eds.), Community and local governance
in Australia, Sydney: UNSW Press., 160. xkcd.com for the cartoon on p.416, https://xkcd.
com/552/.
Every effort has been made to trace the original source of copyright material contained in
this book. The publisher will be pleased to hear from copyright holders to rectify any errors or
omissions.
INTRODUCTION
Now in its fourth edition, Education, Change and Society continues to hinge around several key
purposes.
Of these, probably the first is to help readers situate educational activity in its broad social
and policy contexts. The study of education can do much more than help us understand how
individuals may learn and how teachers should teach. The way any society educates its people
provides important insights into how those societies work; how they are made and ordered. It
helps us understand what is valued in that society, and how ‘winners and losers’ are created. We
have only to look at the life outcomes of the results gained by young people at various points in
their education to see that the way our society organises the education of young people has broad
social, as well as individual, consequences.
Australia continues to experience a period of major reform in education. The way that
schools, school funding, school markets, universities and the responsibilities of government for
education are organised have all been subject to quite radical reform in recent decades. After
coming to power in 2007, the Rudd and Gillard Labor governments increased the pace of change
significantly, even promising an ‘educational revolution’. The change of government in 2013 to a
Liberal–National Coalition has seen a move in different policy directions. Major elements such as
the needs-based funding of schools remain contested, as does policy towards higher education.
This is not unique to Australia. Rapid educational change is also occurring in Europe, North
America and Asia, including trends towards nationalism, a critical response to globalisation
and a growing resistance to the rising tide of migration and refugees. There is a great need to
enhance our understanding of the nature and consequences of such change, and particularly the
implications for education. We need to prepare ourselves for informed intervention if necessary,
whether as students, teachers, parents or simply as active citizens.
As a consequence, the focus of this book embraces both the local and the global contexts of
educational change, and relations between the two. The early chapters focus on young people and
families, and the later chapters focus on national and international policy and curriculum. It has
never been more important for students of education to be able to understand the connections
between the local and the global in explaining contemporary educational change. But it is not
enough to understand the connection between local and international events; it is also necessary
to appreciate how the Australian system has been shaped over time, and how this has influenced
the current institutions and policies that comprise the state of education today. Helping to
understand ‘How did we get to here?’, history assumes an important role in several chapters,
explaining the current operation of education in Australia.
The book is organised in ways that encourages discussion—indeed, contest—of its text. Each
chapter not only describes and analyses what is going on, but also interprets the evidence in
particular ways. None resiles from putting forward a point of view. While this is quite proper,
indeed to be expected in a social science work dealing with major social phenomena that are
themselves contested, it also serves as a springboard to debate and discussion. The educational and
social welfare status of so many of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, that
remains a huge problem and urgent challenge, provides one such example, and there are several
others.
Discussion of the issues raised in this book is encouraged, with the use of boxed texts in each
chapter. These provide evocative comments and grounded examples of matters that the chapters
discuss more broadly. At the end of each chapter a number of focus questions are offered. They
not only help readers identify some of the writers’ key points, but should provoke thought and
discussion beyond the text. Where this book is used as part of a course of study, some of these
questions could easily be used as starting points for students’ own essays, tutorial discussions and
even research, if the various frameworks covered in Chapter 14 are used as suggestions that can
help shape a small research project.
Education, Change and Society is widely used as a textbook; however, it should not be seen
as self-contained. This is where the suggestions for further reading are significant. The book
provides a platform for discovering and exploring the wealth of research and writing on the social
contexts of education and policy studies in Australia and beyond. There are also some suggested
websites to explore. These and other sites must be read critically. As with all texts, websites vary
dramatically in terms of credibility and authority. Some belong to interest groups that are not
so much focused on looking at all sides of a question, but are designed to support very specific
agendas in education. In a universe of ‘alternative facts’ and ‘post truth’, the task of the educator to
critically interrogate facts, evidence and interpretations becomes all the more important.
The contents of this book point to the issues that its authors consider highly significant for an
understanding of Australian education today. Questions raised in this book include:
• What impact has globalisation had on Australian schools?
• How do Aboriginal students experience Australian schools?
• What impacts do neoliberal policy agendas have on schooling?
• How do the new school markets and parental choice operate?
• Why are Australian schools funded in such peculiar ways?
• Who writes policy documents and for what purpose in education?
• Why did state, private and corporate schools emerge as they did in Australia?
• How do social class and gender differences affect schooling and its outcomes?
• How do cultural differences affect the schooling of students and their communities?
• How does the transition of youth from school to work operate?
• How does the world of education in cities differ from that in regional, rural and remote
schools?
• How does what is taught in schools—the curriculum—relate to the preceding questions?
• What constitutes the work of teachers, and can teachers ‘make a difference’?
For teachers, research can be an important tool to investigate issues within the classroom and
beyond. A special feature of the book is treatment of various ways to do this, and the implication
of adopting one or another research framework. For students of education, a research project
could usefully be developed, based on the discussion in Chapter 14. Using one of the research
models sketched in that chapter, perhaps working with a fellow student on a topic of common
interest, is another way to further explore issues in contemporary education.
Whether or not students undertake such a research project, the role of research is increasingly
significant in education, and to teachers in particular. The pace of educational change is great, and
teachers need to know how to read, interpret and do research so that their work and their school’s
operation can respond well to the developing challenges. A research assignment based on the
frameworks outlined in this book is conceived as a first project, one that begins to raise the levels
of awareness about what constitutes useful research questions, methods, data and conclusions.
We wish you well in the use of this book. The authors of this fourth edition have worked hard
to increase its contemporary relevance. We hope that it will provide a stimulus to good thinking
and provide some useful perspectives that will help you understand the ways that education in
Australia operates.
1
YOUNG PEOPLE AND SCHOOL
Debra Hayes
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
After reading this chapter, you should be able to answer the following questions.
• How does schooling play an active role in maintaining and reproducing inequality in
society?
• Why do some groups of students achieve consistently better outcomes from schooling
than others?
• How do schools close the achievement gap for young people whose families experience
socio-economic disadvantage or other forms of social exclusion?
• What types of educational research contribute to understanding the lives of young people?
• How do the political views of teachers shape their pedagogical practices?
• What are some of the ways that power operates in classrooms?
Introduction
Schools work well for some groups of students, but not for all. This is an enduring and
unintended feature of schooling. Young people whose families experience socio-economic
Social exclusion hardship, or some other form of social exclusion, are likely to perform less well or leave school
takes into account earlier than their more affluent peers. In this chapter, the negative implications of incorrectly
issues other than
attributing this difference to heritable characteristics are discussed, and alternative ways of
a lack of material
resources in understanding this feature of schooling are outlined. In Chapter 2 we elaborate on different kinds
understanding of families and the many worlds of childhood, but our concern in this chapter is to trace ways
the factors of thinking about differences between families, and how these differences are linked to young
that create and people’s educational pathways.
sustain different
forms of social
disadvantage.
For young
people, exclusion
Schools, teachers and families
matters more Schools bring individuals together for the purpose of providing young people with an education.
than economic The purpose of education does not need to be limited to ensuring that young people are equipped
deprivation—and
to contribute productively to society. In addition to this utilitarian function of schooling,
it hurts more
(Skattebol et al.
education has the potential to prepare young people to pursue and enjoy their own interests,
2012). develop their talents and engage in social and cultural interactions with others that enrich their
lives. Ensuring that all young people receive this type of education contributes to a just society
and to the health and well-being of all its citizens.
A fair go at school for all young people is a global issue of concern and a matter of social justice.
Most of us are familiar with the institution of schooling because we have been to school. Schools
also feature as a common backdrop in books, films and television programs. However, the sum
of these experiences is unlikely to provide sufficient intellectual resources to understand how
schooling functions in society.
The fact that schools work better for some students than for others may be accounted for
in a variety of ways. A common explanation is variation in individual traits, such as interests
and ability that develop and change with time. The effects of place and access to educational
resources are also important considerations. Inequitable outcomes from schooling are not limited
to differences between individuals, they are also linked to the characteristics of groups, such as
whether young people are from affluent families or families living in poverty, and whether they
are Indigenous or non-Indigenous. While these factors may be linked to success at school, the
mechanism by which they work is less clear. We begin by considering the role of teachers, then
examine different ways of explaining why schools work better for some students than for others.
Teachers have the opportunity to influence the lives and chances of young people. The
significance of their role is perhaps second only to that of parents and other caregivers. These
professionals shape not only what young people learn but also what they value, believe and
understand. This is not to suggest that young people are uncritical of adult influences in their
lives, but rather to emphasise the constant and wide-ranging nature of a teacher’s influence. For
this reason, the term pedagogy is often used to encompass the broader purposes and effects of the Pedagogy
professional practice of teachers. the educational
Teachers are not health workers, aid workers or social workers, although they share many practices of
teachers that
of these workers’ concerns. Instead, the challenges faced by teachers are pedagogical in nature.
are intended
Teachers are charged with finding ways of working with and for their students to close the gaps in to support
achievement between different groups, and to help all young people make a successful transition students’ learning
from childhood to adulthood. outcomes,
In this chapter, a fictional teacher named Julie is introduced. Although she is not real, Julie is including the
acquisition of
based on the real experiences of many teachers. Her ‘story’ provides a means by which to explore knowledge and
how teachers’ pedagogical practices are influenced by their background and values, as well as the skills, and the
contexts in which they work and live. development
of values and
dispositions that
Debra Hayes
administrative work, technician and trade work, labouring, machinery operation and
driving. Most children come from parent couple families, but about three in ten are
from one-parent families.
It is not unusual for Julie to lie awake at night worrying about how to make a
difference in the lives of her students. The kind of difference she wants to make is
to ensure that her students receive similar outcomes from schooling as their more
affluent peers.
Paulo Freire (1994) described the kind of teaching that contributes to justice and equity in the
world as the ‘pedagogy of the oppressed’. Central to his work and writing was a way of thinking
about power that explained how it is unfairly distributed, and how it may be transformed through
radical social awareness and liberating action. Freire offered a critical way of understanding
education and described how teachers can play a part in contributing towards social justice, as
discussed in the ‘Theory to practice’ box.
THEORY TO PRACTICE
The politics of practice
• Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Teachers and others who want to make a difference engage in different forms of
advocacy that are linked to their political beliefs. Paulo Freire was a radical thinker
who believed that teachers should engage their students in critical liberating dialogue
involving reflection and action leading to independence. Freire referred to this as
‘praxis’. Freire believed that teachers must value and respect the experiences of
their students, including how they speak (syntax) and other markers of their family
background and origins, while also giving them access to dominant forms of language
and knowledge. Freire claimed that political views are linked to action, and that
teaching is a form of political action that is exercised through institutional power and
results in a range of outcomes. Freire described a range of political beliefs and their
associated actions. While he was a radical thinker, he was concerned about the impact
on education of other ways of thinking, such as elitism and conservatism. Below are
some contemporary political beliefs. Read these descriptions and pause to reflect on
the questions below.
• Neoconservatives believe that markets provide the best mechanism for delivering
education and health care, and that individuals are responsible for making use of
markets to obtain economic independence and well-being. They believe that through
enterprise and hard work individuals can take care of their basic needs and gain
additional benefits.
• Socialists intervene to ensure that those who are marginalised have access to
support and resources that will enable them to participate in society. They believe
that the economic processes and social structures in a society should be used for
the benefit of all its members, and that governments should intervene to ensure
that resources are more equitably distributed.
• Radicals attempt to subvert political, economic and social structures which they
consider oppressive. They believe that these structures need to be transformed in
order to achieve justice and a more equitable society.
Researching inequity
What happens at school really does matter. Achievement and participation at school are not
dependent only upon the characteristics of children, since there is great variation in what schools
and teachers are able to achieve. Therefore, it is important to understand why some groups
of students generally do better at school than others, and why some schools and teachers are
more successful at closing this achievement gap. This has been a long-term issue of concern
in education, and researchers have drawn upon a range of ways of thinking (epistemologies)
and investigative approaches (research methods) to understand the problem of inequality in
educational outcomes.
Debra Hayes
For example, psychologists have looked to concepts such as motivation, historians have traced
the impact of changes in society, and sociologists have considered the impact of class, race,
ethnicity and so on. Each of these ways of thinking about differences in educational outcomes can
be matched to appropriate investigative approaches. For instance, psychologists might develop
scales perhaps in the form of surveys, historians commonly engage in documentary analysis that is
sometimes supplemented by interviews, sociologists also use surveys and might supplement these
with, for example, interviews, observations and policy analysis. A form of educational research
that has proven particularly useful in exploring differential outcomes in education is called
Ethnography ethnography. This approach is used mostly by sociologists of education.
an approach An early ethnographic study conducted by Oscar Lewis used a detailed description of five
to conducting days in the lives of five Mexican families to paint portraits of the experiences of families living in
research that
poverty. In Five Families, Lewis (1966) developed the idea of a ‘culture of poverty’. It suggested
combines
sustained field that families who live in poverty lack or are deficient in the resources, values and attitudes that
work in particular contribute to success, and that these deficiencies explain, at least in part, why they are poor.
contexts with While Lewis’ study was conducted at a much earlier time and in a specific context, the concept
methods of inquiry of a culture of poverty continues to inform how some people answer the question, ‘Why do
that produce
historically,
some groups of students do better at school than others?’ This kind of logic is illustrated in an
politically and ethnographic study of a Western Australian high school, in which Martin Forsey (2007) spent
personally many months as a ‘fly on the wall’, particularly in its staff common room. He described how some
situated accounts, of the teachers (pseudonyms used) explained the impact on the school of more affluent families
descriptions,
moving into a nearby suburb.
interpretations
and Warraville was sometimes reported to be a dangerous place. On two occasions,
representations Deputy Principal Liam used the public address system to announce reports
of human lives, of unsavoury characters lurking in Warraville. He warned students to be extra
actions and
careful if they had to move through the area. Teachers commented often enough
interactions.
on Warraville’s propensity for producing the rougher students, the ‘bad eggs’, as
Donald, one of the senior staff members, called them. He described the general
student body as comprised of ‘nice, basic kids who get on very well and don’t have
too many problems with bullying or pecking orders’. Linking this to the their ‘white
Caucasian, middle-class background’, he suggested that ‘even if they come from
different cultures’, by which he was referring to students who were not white, ‘well,
they almost fit that mould, and they get on very well’. When I asked him to clarify
this point he nodded in the direction of Warraville and said, ‘Well, we have a socio-
economic group that were over there and they seem to be disappearing very quickly.’
In addition to his teaching job, Donald also works as a part-time real estate
agent. His reference to the current Warraville population disappearing reflected his
knowledge of land values in the area. Based on this he surmised that: ‘The general
middle-class to lower socio-economic population in the school is changing, because
the lower socio-economic group is moving. Warraville is disappearing. It is now a
very sought-after area so you will see the socio-economic group lift’.
Kate, one of the science teachers, expressed a similar sentiment about the socio-
economic status of the student population being ‘on the rise’. She spoke to me about
how rough the school was when she first arrived there in the mid-1980s, but over the
years this had changed and the kids were now much nicer and happier. When asked
to account for this shift, she hypothesized that the school’s loss of roughness might
be attributable to recent gains in local real estate prices and the increased affluence of
the people moving into the area (Forsey 2007, p. 67).
The teachers associated the socio-economic group that was in decline at Warraville with
danger. They identified the ‘bad eggs’ in the student population as coming from that particular
group. These views are not limited to teachers and they are not representative of how all teachers
think, but they are commonly used to explain differential outcomes from schooling. Such
explanations are underpinned by ways of thinking that associate success or failure at school with
the presumed behaviours and attributes of groups, often informed by stereotyped assumptions,
rather than how these groups are positioned within society through larger historical, political and
economic forces. Importantly, teachers who hold these views are likely to expect students from
families who experience economic hardship, or some other form of social exclusion, to not do well
at school. Importantly for teachers, deficit ways of thinking about difference in education offer
weak solutions for bridging the achievement gap between students from different backgrounds.
Other types of ethnography have focused on the lived experiences of students and their
families, thus providing a different account of the link between poverty and education. Paul
Willis’ (1977) classic Learning to Labour: How Working-class Kids Get Working-class Jobs
focused on twelve working-class ‘lads’ growing up in the English Midlands; it illustrated in rich
detail their understanding of how working-class culture was poorly valued within the context
of schooling. Their accents, their parents’ jobs, and their social and sporting interests counted
for little within the educational institution. Willis related how, through the development of an
oppositional school culture, many of them railed against the way they were positioned, but in
so doing effectively sealed their fate as underachievers at school. The ‘lads’ faced an unenviable
choice: success at school or retaining their working-class identities, including family bonds and
traditional pathways to blue-collar employment. Willis’ study details how society and schooling
play very active roles in maintaining and reproducing inequality. It represents a sophisticated form
of what is often called ‘reproduction theory’, which posits that institutions created by societies,
such as schools, and the practices of these institutions, such as pedagogies, contribute to some
groups of students consistently doing better at school than others. (See the ‘Research in action’
box in Chapter 3 for further discussion of Willis’ work.)
The landmark Australian study Making the Difference: Schools, Families and Social Division
(Connell et al. 1982) was written when reproduction theory (as illustrated by Willis 1977) was
challenging deficit theories (as illustrated by Lewis 1966) about inequity in education. The authors
acknowledged that ‘The reproduction paradigm wrought a revolution in theory, but has had rather
thin effects on practice’ (p. 28). They ‘were bothered by the increasing abstractness and dogmatism
Debra Hayes
F l S i ll th t I k G d
Fol. So is all the remenaunt, I make God auowe;
For thou fourmest suche fantasyes in theyr mynde, 1300
That euery man almost groweth out of kynde.
Fol. Ye, tourne ouer the lefe, rede there and loke,
Howe frantyke Fansy fyrst of all 1310
Maketh man and woman in foly to fall.
Cr. Con. Cockes armes, thou shalte kepe the brewhouse boule.
Cr. Con. When mesure is gone, what nedest thou spare? 1340
Whan mesure is gone, we may slee care.
M T h h ld k t f
Magn. Tushe, holde your peas, ye speke out of season:
Yourselfe shall be ruled by lyberte and largesse.
Lyb. Must mesure, in the mares name, you furnysshe and dresse?
Magn. What, wyll ye waste wynde, and prate thus in vayne? 1420
Ye haue eten sauce, I trowe, at the Taylers Hall.
Fan. Why, wene you that I can kepe hym longe styll?
Magn. What nede you with hym thus prate and chat?
Fan. What the deuyll, man, your name shalbe the greter,
For welth without largesse is all out of kynde.
Magn. Nowe holde ye content, for there is none other shyfte. 1460
L b S d th th ith t th th
Lyb. Syr, we can do nothynge the one without the other.
Magn. Well, get you hens than, and sende me some other.
Court. Ab. Syr, then with the fauour of your benynge sufferaunce
To shewe you my mynde myselfe I wyll auaunce,
If it lyke your grace to take it in degre.
Court. Ab. Nay, nay, for lesse I waraunt you to be sped, 1590
And brought home, and layde in your bed.
Magn. Wolde money, trowest thou, make suche one to the call?
Magn. Why, wyl a maystres be wonne for money and for golde?
Court. Ab. Why, was not for money Troy bothe bought and solde?
Full many a stronge cyte and towne hath ben wonne
By the meanes of money without ony gonne.
A maystres, I tell you, is but a small thynge;
A goodly rybon, or a golde rynge,
May wynne with a sawte the fortresse of the holde; 1600
But one thynge I warne you, prece forth and be bolde.
Magn. Ye, but some be full koy and passynge harde harted.
Court. Ab. But, blessyd be our Lorde, they wyll be sone conuerted.
Magn. Why, wyll they then be intreted, the most and the lest?
Court. Ab. I coude holde you with suche talke hens tyll to
morowe;
But yf it lyke your grace, more at large
Me to permyt my mynde to dyscharge,
I wolde yet shewe you further of my consayte. 1610
Magn. Let se what ye say, shewe it strayte.
Magn. Stande a lytell abacke, syr, and let hym come hyder.
Court Ab With a good wyll syr God spede you bothe togyder
Court. Ab. With a good wyll, syr, God spede you bothe togyder.
Court. Ab. By myne aduyse with you in fayth he shall not rest.
Magn. Well, for thy sake the better I may endure 1700
That he come hyder, and to gyue hym a loke
That he shall lyke the worse all this woke.
Cl. Col. Syr, I beseche you, let pety haue some place
In your brest towardes this gentylman.
Cl. Col. Say somwhat nowe, let se, for your selfe.[842]
Cl. Col. Abyde, syr, abyde, let me holde your hede. 1750
Cl. Col. Syr, nowe me thynke your harte is well eased. 1760
Cl. Col. Not amonge noble men, as the worlde gothe: 1770
It is no wonder therfore thoughe ye be wrothe
With Mesure. Where as all noblenes is, there I haue past:
They catche that catche may, kepe and holde fast,
Out of all measure themselfe to enryche;
No force what thoughe his neyghbour dye in a dyche.
With pollynge and pluckynge out of all measure,
Thus must ye stuffe and store your treasure.
ebooksecure.com