Hard Evidence
Hard Evidence
HARD EVIDENCE
CASE STUDIES IN FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY
Edited By
Routledge
Taylor & Francis Group
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in
any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter
invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are
used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Credits and acknowledgments borrowed from other sources and reproduced, with permission, in this textbook
appear on appropriate page within text.
PREFACE vi
INDEX 332
PREFACE
T he first edition of Hard Evidence was born from a need for scientific realism in the face of
media popularization of the field whereby the aptitude of forensic anthropologists for
solving forensic cases borders on mythic or even science fiction. The heart of forensic anthro-
pology is the adherence to the principles of skeletal biology and rigorous attention to detail in
lieu of a hologram machine or psychic powers. The goal of the first edition was to provide case
studies that demonstrated the scientific approach and techniques of forensic anthropology in a
manner that was both accessible and interesting. That goal was met thanks to the brilliant
authors that contributed to the volume. The goals of the second edition are not unlike those of
the first—to supplement the burgeoning number of forensic anthropological textbooks with
case studies that demonstrate a number of scientific principles. However, this edition improves
on the first in a number of ways, including more cases on topical areas of inquiry (e.g., child
abuse, forensic archaeology), important scientific techniques (e.g., facial reproduction, DNA),
and legal issues, as well as updates of existing cases. In all, seven new chapters are included,
six chapters are updated, and the utility of the text is increased by an index.
As the first edition was being written, significant events impacted the world and the disci-
pline of forensic anthropology. Over thirty anthropologists participated in the recovery
and identification efforts in the months after September 11, 2001. Amy Zelson Mundorff,
one of the contributors to the first edition, was the forensic anthropologist for the Office of
the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) in New York City and helped coordinate the identifi-
cation efforts for the World Trade Center disaster. While Amy and I discussed including a
chapter about the response in the first edition, the timing was not right. Not only did the
events seem too “fresh” to write about, but I really wanted to include the anthropological
perspectives from the responses at the other sites. Thus, this edition includes a contextual
overview of the anthropological roles in the responses to the World Trade Center,
Pentagon, and Shanksville, Pennsylvania, disasters. Paul Sledzik took on the unenviable
tasks of coordinating authors and braving multiple bureaucratic agencies to make this
chapter come to fruition and I am in his debt.
Increased legal adherence to Daubert and other rules of evidence has stimulated much
anthropological research in the past five years. In the first edition, Lyle Konigsberg and
I lamented in “Multiple Points of Similarity” that quantifying the strength of a positive iden-
tification is extremely challenging with standard osteological data of age, sex, stature, and
pathology. This chapter became fodder for a larger study of the quantification of osteological
congruency in potential identifications (Steadman, Adams, and Konigsberg 2006) and is now
updated to include these new results. In addition, Wieserma and Love present a new radi-
ographic technique that also permits quantification of the strength of an identification. While
the statistics may initially appear daunting, the principles are not difficult to comprehend and
a quantified approach is crucial to anthropologists who present their reports in court.
Other additions to this edition not only reflect the strengths of the former edition in
presenting accessible case studies but expand the scope to include a broader number of
anthropological contributions to forensic science. The inclusion of a chapter on child abuse
is particularly pertinent and timely. Given the increase in the number of cases of child
abuse/fatalities, it is imperative that forensic anthropologists recognize the skeletal
signature of intentionally inflicted injuries. Douglas Ubelaker provides an in-depth
vi
PREFACE vii
The organization of the book has changed to reflect new and different emphases than
the first edition and one additional section is provided. The case studies in Section I
focus on different aspects of personal identification, from the particular methods used
to the impact on the families when the truth about the fate of a loved one is finally
known. Section II emphasizes the legal context in which forensic anthropologists must
operate. Recent legislative changes concerning the rules of evidence admissibility
greatly impact how anthropologists present their findings in court, which is further
demonstrated by two new chapters. In addition to the Wiersema and Love chapter that
discusses rules of evidence, Ousley and Hollinger discuss the laws governing historic
cases, particularly those involving Native American remains. Stephen Ousley is one of
the original architects of Fordisc and provides an expanded example of its use within
historic contexts.
Section III focuses on archaeological applications of anthropological casework. In
addition to two domestic cases, including an interesting update on a case presented by
Sauer and colleagues, this section further highlights the efforts of the anthropologists at
the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command-Central Identification Laboratory (formerly
known as CILHI). Mann and colleagues present some new data in their discussion of two
cases from Vietnam while a novel chapter by James Pokines reviews the importance of
taphonomic influences in archaeological recoveries. This discussion of taphonomy leads
into Section IV, Interpretation of Taphonomy and Trauma. Marks and co-authors add to
the casework on trauma by providing a rich perspective on the skeletal markers and inter-
pretation of child abuse, while Marks and Love, together with Ian Dadour provide addi-
tional information on forensic entomology.
Section V, Analytical Techniques in Forensic Anthropology, includes cases that
employ DNA, skeletal histology, bone chemistry, and cut mark interpretations. This
section is bolstered by the new chapter on facial reproduction by Ubelaker. Section VI,
Mass Disasters and Human Rights Investigations, contains the final chapters of the book.
Sledzik provides some updates in the chapter on the first DMORT deployment while
multiple anthropologists, led by Sledzik, discuss the largest mass disaster response in the
United States—that of September 11. The human rights component is strengthened by
another contribution by the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF), which
provides some additional perspectives on the investigations of the Dirty War in
Argentina.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
In addition to the all of the people who helped me write the first edition, I’d like to
thank Nicole Jastremski for helping to copy edit the updated section overviews. I am
also thankful to my editor, Nancy Roberts, who kept pushing me to do a second edition
and didn’t take my response of “Over my dead body!” too literally. I again want to
recognize my husband, Gary (a.k.a. “the most patient husband in the world”), whose
support and humor knows no boundaries. Finally, I want to thank my two sons, Ryan
and Collin, who give me perspective, balance, and more love than I ever imagined
existed.
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS
Dr. Adams received his M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Tennessee. He is currently
the Director of the Forensic Anthropology Unit for the Office of Chief Medical Examiner
(OCME) in New York City. He is also an Adjunct Lecturer at Hunter College and Pace
University, holds a faculty position at the New York University Medical Center, and an
affiliation with the NYU Anthropology Department. In his present position with the
OCME, Dr. Adams and his team are responsible for all forensic anthropology casework in
the five boroughs of New York City (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten
Island). Since 2006, Dr. Adams and his team have been undertaking a large-scale effort to
recover additional human remains associated with the terrorist attacks on the World
Trade Center. This is a complex operation involving archaeological excavations around
Ground Zero, the hand-screening of large quantities of excavated soil, and the analysis of
human remains. Prior to accepting the position in New York City, Dr. Adams was a foren-
sic anthropologist and Laboratory Manager at the Central Identification Laboratory in
Hawaii.
STEVEN A. ANDERSEN
Senior Investigator
New York State Police
Troop “C” Forensic Identification Unit
Sidney, NY 13838
Steven Andersen is currently the Senior Investigator in charge of the New York State Police
Troop C Forensic Identification Unit (FIU) based in Sidney, NY. He has been with the State
Police for twenty-two years and in the Forensics Unit for the last fifteen years. The FIU is
responsible for responding to and documenting scenes of major crimes and incidents. His
specialties include crime scene processing and reconstruction, latent print examination
and comparison, fire cause and origin investigation, and the location and recovery of
skeletal remains. He previously attended the State University of New York at Oswego
before joining the State Police.
viii
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS ix
Dr. Anderson received his M.A. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Arizona, where
he currently mentors a forensic anthropology internship program and teaches a course in
forensic anthropology. He worked as a physical anthropologist for the U.S. Army Central
Identification Laboratory (CILHI) in Hawaii beginning in 1992 and departing in 1996 as
Senior Anthropologist. Dr. Anderson is currently the anthropologist for the Pima County
Office of the Medical Examiner. His academic interests include forensic anthropology,
human anatomy, and human evolution.
Ms. Bisso has an advanced degree in archaeology from Universidad de Buenos Aires and has
been an expert consultant for EAAF (Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense) for
many years. She has done fieldwork for the team in Argentina, South Africa, Angola,
Cyprus, Kosovo, and Zimbabwe.
MARK E. BLUMER
Office of the Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney
312 S. Jackson St.
Jackson, MI 49201
Mark Blumer was the First Assistant Attorney General in the Criminal Division, Michigan
Department of the Attorney General. He joined the Attorney General’s Criminal Division
in 1978, became the Chief Trial Attorney in 1985, and the First Assistant in 1990. His
primary responsibility was the trial of high visibility, complex felony cases, with special-
ization in cold file homicides. Mr. Blumer retired from state service in 2005 after thirty
years. One week later, he became the Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney in Jackson
County, Michigan. Mr. Blumer continues to prosecute cases on occasion; however, his
primary responsibilities now are administrative in the county that includes the largest
civilian prison in the United States.
Dr. Bunch received her Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1993. She is currently
an Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at SUNY Brockport. Dr. Bunch was
previously employed as a forensic anthropologist for the U.S. Army, where she per-
formed fourteen missions for the Central Identification Laboratory, Hawaii. Her
research interests include forensic science in general, human anatomy, osteology, and
archaeology.
x ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS
Dr. Burns received her M.A. and Ph.D. in forensic anthropology at the University of
Florida. Her major crime lab experience is from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation,
Division of Forensic Sciences. In addition to modern forensic cases, historic cases, and
disaster work, Dr. Burns has devoted much of her professional career to training and
human identification in international conflict situations, including Guatemala, Iraq,
Haiti, and Colombia. She is a founding member of EQUITAS, an NGO providing forensic
and psychosocial services to families of the disappeared in Colombia, and is a 2007
Fulbright Scholar at the University of the Andes. She teaches part-time at the University
of Utah.
Dr. Crowder received his B.A. from Texas A&M University, M.A. from the University of
Texas at Arlington, and Ph.D. from the University of Toronto. He is currently a forensic
anthropologist for the Office of Chief Medical Examiner in New York City. He is also an
Adjunct Lecturer at Hunter College, holds a faculty position at the New York University
Medical Center, and an affiliation with the NYU Anthropology Department. In his present
position with the OCME, Dr. Crowder assists with anthropology casework in the five bor-
oughs of New York City (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island).
He is also the site coordinator for the on-going search and recovery of remains at Ground
Zero. Prior to accepting the position in New York City, Dr. Crowder was a forensic anthro-
pologist at the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command-Central Identification Laboratory
in Hawaii.
Dr. Dadour received his Ph.D. from the University of Western Australia. He is Director of
the Centre for Forensic Science and a Registered Forensic Practitioner. He is the State’s
Honorary Forensic Entomologist and, as an expert witness in the science of entomology,
has appeared in courts in Western Australia, Northern Territory, Queensland, and
New South Wales. He has organized a number of forensic entomology workshops around
Australia that include the investigation of decomposition of bodies buried and on the
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS xi
surface and is now part of the team involved in teaching the Human Remains Recovery
School for the Federal Bureau of Investigation Evidence Response Teams.
Following the events of the September 11 World Trade Center attack in New York City,
Frank DePaolo accepted a position with the Office of Chief Medical Examiner as a
medicolegal investigator and was assigned to the Medical Examiner’s Disaster Recovery
Team at the World Trade Center site. Since then, Mr. DePaolo developed the Special
Operations Unit and now serves as the Project Manager overseeing the ongoing World
Trade Center Recovery Operation. Prior to his current position, Mr. DePaolo served as a
physician assistant (PA) in Emergency Medicine. He has twenty years of experience as
both a New York City paramedic and board certified practicing physician assistant.
He continues to serve in the U.S. Navy Reserve as a Lieutenant Commander assigned to
the National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD.
Dr. Dirkmaat is the Director of the Applied Forensic Sciences Department at Mercyhurst
College that includes both an undergraduate program in Forensic Sciences and a
Master ’s program in Anthropology (Forensic and Biological Anthropology). He has
been a full professor of Anthropology at the College since 2006. Dr. Dirkmaat is a
Diplomate of the American Board of Forensic Anthropology (no. 50) and a Fellow of the
American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He has conducted over 300 forensic anthropol-
ogy cases, including over 60 field recoveries involving the processing of evidence from a
variety of human death scenes ranging from surface scatters to buried bodies and fatal
fire victims. Dr. Dirkmaat has been a member of the Federal Government’s Disaster
Mortuary Operational Response Team (DMORT) since its inception in the mid-1990s.
Dr. Dirkmaat served as a key scientific advisor for Somerset County Coroner Wallace
Miller during the initial phases of the scene recovery and morgue operations for United
Flight 93. Dr. Dirkmaat also served as consultant to both the Somerset County Coroner’s
office and United Airlines during the subsequent recoveries conducted at the crash site
following FBI release of the scene to the coroner’s office.
Jennifer Fillion is a faculty member in Anthropology and Sociology in the Social Science
Division at Mott Community College. She received her B.A. from the University of
Michigan and M.A. from the University of Alabama. Her interests include forensic anthro-
pology, skeletal biology, and facial reconstruction. Her work has been featured in Bone
Detective: The Story of Forensic Anthropologist Diane France and at the Van Andel Public
Museum in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
LUIS FONDEBRIDER
Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense (EAAF), Buenos Aires
Rivadavia 2443, 2nd piso
Buenos Aires (1034)
Argentina
Dr. Gill-King received a Ph.D. in Anthropology from Southern Methodist University and
completed postdoctoral studies in hard tissue pathology at the University of Texas
Southwestern Institute of Forensic Sciences. He is Director of the Laboratory of Forensic
Anthropology and Human Identification in the Department of Biological Sciences at the
University of North Texas, where he also holds joint appointments in Criminal Justice and
Anthropology, and in the Department of Pathology at the University of North Texas Health
Science Center. His current research interests are in the areas of skeletal endocrinology and
the dietary adaptations of New World colonials. He consults regularly with local, state,
and federal agencies in the United States as well as the Servicio Periciale and the Judicial
Federal Police in Mexico.
ANAHÍ GINARTE
Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense (EAAF), Buenos Aires
Rivadavia 2443, 2nd piso
Buenos Aires (1034)
Argentina
Ms. Ginarte joined the staff of EAAF (Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense) seventeen
years ago, and since then has acted as expert witness for the judiciary, special commissions
of inquiry, and international tribunals. She has worked for EAAF in Argentina and other
Latin American countries, the Balkans, Ethiopia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, the Ivory Coast,
Congo (DRC), Sierra Leone, and East Timor on the application of forensic anthropology
and archaeology to the investigation of human rights cases. She has conducted training
seminars, presentations, and lectures on the application of forensic sciences at both acade-
mic and legal venues all over the world.
Dr. Glassman is Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Professor of Anthropology at the
University of Southern Indiana. He received his doctorate from the University of
Tennessee. Dr. Glassman is a past Chairman of the Physical Anthropology section of the
American Academy of Forensic Sciences and currently serves as Vice President of the
American Board of Forensic Anthropology, Inc. He has twenty-seven years of experience
in forensic anthropology and skeletal biology, and has an active record of scholarly publi-
cation and presented papers. Dr. Glassman has consulted with various law enforcement
agencies in over 250 cases of skeletal identification.
Dr. Holland received his Ph.D. from the University of Missouri, Columbia, where
he was the Associate Curator for the Museum of Anthropology prior to becoming
the Scientific Director of the U.S. Army Central Identification Laboratory in Hawaii.
He is on the board of directors for the American Board of Forensic Anthropology.
Dr. Holland has published in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, American
Antiquity, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Current Anthropology, Studies in Archaeological
Method and Theory, Quaternary Research, and Plains Anthropologist, among others. His
research interests include forensic anthropology, bioarchaeology, and evolutionary
theory.
R. ERIC HOLLINGER
Office of Repatriation
Department of Anthropology
National Museum of Natural History
Smithsonian Institution
Washington, D.C. 20560
Dr. Jumbelic is the Chief Medical Examiner for the County of Onondaga in Syracuse,
New York. In addition, she holds the position of Clinical Associate Professor in the
Department of Pathology for Upstate Medical University and is Director of their Autopsy
Service. Dr. Jumbelic is the primary instructor for pathology residents during their autopsy
rotations, and teaches second-year medical students forensic pathology and death certifica-
tion. Her areas of interest include the prevention of injuries in children, mass disasters, and
collaboration with forensic anthropology.
Paulette Leach received her bachelor’s degree from Arizona State University and was a
graduate student in anthropology at California State University, Chico.
Jennifer C. Love received her M.A. and Ph.D. in Anthropology from the University of
Tennessee, Knoxville. She is currently the Forensic Anthropology Director at the Harris
County Medical Examiner ’s Office, Houston, TX. Her research interests are bone
trauma, bone pathology, and postmortem interval analysis. She is a member of the
American Association of Forensic Sciences and International Association of
Identification.
Dr. Mann is Deputy Scientific Director, Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command’s Central
Identification Laboratory (JPAC-CIL) in Hawaii. He received his B.A. and M.A. degrees in
anthropology from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and his Ph.D. from the
University of Hawaii. Prior to joining the JPAC-CIL, Dr. Mann worked as an anthropolo-
gist at the Smithsonian Institution for nearly five years. He has worked at the JPAC-CIL
for more than sixteen years and has been on more than forty search and recovery missions
around the world, including Vietnam, Laos, Japan, Russia, Latvia, Belgium, Germany,
Poland, and South Korea. His research interests include paleopathology, trauma, and
human skeletal variation. He is a Diplomate of the American Board of Forensic
Anthropologists and has written three books and more than 100 papers in the scientific
and lay literature.
Dr. Marks received his M.A. from the University of Arkansas and Ph.D. from the
University of Tennessee. Besides forensic anthropology, he is a dental anthropologist and
skeletal biologist with research interests in mineralized tissue histology, dental develop-
ment, fetal growth, computer-graphic facial reconstruction, and bioarchaeology. He is
Director of the Human Remains Recovery School for the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Evidence Response Teams and a consultant to the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation.
Dr. Melton is President and CEO of Mitotyping Technologies, a company that performs
mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analyses for law enforcement, attorneys, and private indi-
viduals. She received a B.S. from Wake Forest University and both M.S. and Ph.D. degrees
in genetics from the Pennsylvania State University. She has a research background in the
study of mtDNA as a forensic typing locus. Research topics include an evaluation of the
diversity and subpopulation heterogeneity present in the mtDNA of approximately forty
populations from Europe, North America, Africa, and Asia, studies of mtDNA and nuclear
DNA variation in indigenous aboriginal populations from Kenya and Taiwan, and
research into the mtDNA variation associated with Southeast Asian and Polynesian pre-
history. She is currently serving on the editorial board of the Journal of Forensic Sciences and
is an affiliate researcher with the Department of Anthropology at Penn State University.
County, Tennessee. Her areas of interest include deaths in custody and pediatric
forensic pathology with emphasis on child abuse.
From 1999 to 2004, Amy Zelson Mundorff was the forensic anthropologist for the Office of
Chief Medical Examiner, the city of New York, where she analyzed forensic cases involv-
ing unidentified individuals and bone trauma. She also helped direct mortuary operations
for several disasters, including the World Trade Center attacks, the crash of American
Airlines Flight 587, and the Staten Island Ferry crash. Currently she is completing her
Ph.D. at Simon Fraser University in the Department of Archaeology. Amy holds a Master’s
degree from California State University, Chico. She also has experience as a field archaeol-
ogist in California, Hawaii, Jamaica, and New York, excavating prehistoric and historic
sites as well as performing osteological analyses.
Dr. Naul is Chairman of the Department of Radiology at Scott and White Clinic and
Hospital in Temple, Texas, and Professor and Head of the Department of Radiology of the
Texas A&M University College of Medicine. Dr. Naul specializes in neuroradiology and
has been the Chief of the Section of Magnetic Resonance at Scott and White for over
twenty years.
DARÍO OLMO
Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense (EAAF), Buenos Aires
Rivadavia 2443, 2nd piso
Buenos Aires (1034)
Argentina
Darío Olmo co-founded EAAF (Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense) twenty-three years
ago and acted as president of the organization between 1997 and 2002. He has worked for
EAAF in Argentina, Uruguay, Peru, Paraguay, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Venezuela, Colombia,
Panama, Honduras, Guatemala, Kosovo, and Congo (DRC) on the application of forensic
anthropology and archaeology to the investigation of human rights cases, and has acted as
expert witness for the judiciary, special commissions of inquiry, and international tribunals.
He is a faculty member of the Universidad de Buenos Aires, Universidad Nacional del
Centro, and Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. His articles and books on forensic anthropol-
ogy have been published in Argentina, the United States, the United Kingdom, Colombia,
and France.
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS xix
Dr. Pokines received his B.A. from Cornell University and his M.A. and Ph.D. degrees
from the University of Chicago. He is currently employed as a forensic anthropologist at
the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, Central Identification Laboratory (JPAC-
CIL), and is a Research Associate in the Division of Mammals, Field Museum, Chicago.
He has ongoing osteological projects in the Bolivian Altiplano, the Masai Mara National
Reserve in Kenya, and northern Jordan. His research interests include forensic anthropol-
ogy, zooarchaeology, vertebrate taphonomy, predator ecology, and archaeology.
Dr. Pope received her M.A. and Ph.D. in anthropology from the University of Arkansas,
Fayetteville. She examines the effects of burning to bone and tissues of the human body
through experimental studies with cadaver models for use by arson and death investiga-
tors. She researches how the human body burns for application to forensic casework and
features of homicide, particularly identification of traumatic injury (ballistic, blunt force,
and sharp force trauma) for differentiating manner of death between accidental or crimi-
nal attempts to destroy evidence of the body with fire. She has taught forensic anthropol-
ogy, forensic taphonomy, developmental and fragmentary osteology, and criminalistics at
the University of Arkansas in the Anthropology Department, Northwest Arkansas
Community College, and consults on forensic cases involving skeletal or burned human
remains for the Arkansas State Medical Examiner’s Office and private casework.
Dr. Salado has a Ph.D. in Biological Anthropology from the Universidad Autónoma de
Madrid. She has been awarded various research grants from her university as well as from
Unversidad de San Carlos, Guatemala. She has gained broad experience in the application
of forensic anthropology and archaeology to the investigation of human rights violations,
from 1998 as a member of FAFG (Fundación de Antropología Forense de Guatemala) and
then from 2003 as a member of EAAF. Besides Guatemala and Argentina, she has worked in
Peru, Bosnia, Herzegovina, Mexico, Sudan, Togo, and Cyprus, and has acted as an expert
witness for the judiciary, special commissions of inquiry, and international tribunals.
After earning her B.S. in Psychology from Wellesley College in 1986, Colleen Carney Shine
served as Director of Public Relations for the National League of POW/MIA Families, a
Washington, D.C.-based non-profit organization dedicated to the fullest possible account-
ing for Americans who are still prisoners or missing as a result of the Vietnam War.
A staunch advocate for veterans’ issues, Ms. Shine responds to media interest, and fre-
quently addresses student, civic, military, and veteran’s organizations. She has served on
the board of directors of the National League of POW/MIA Families, Sons and Daughters
In Touch, Inc., and The Friends of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Ms. Shine is married
and lives in Munich, Germany, where she works as a writer and marketing consultant.
Paul Sledzik received his M.S. in Biological Anthropology from the University of
Connecticut and has been with the NTSB since 2004. From 1990 to 2003, he served as Curator
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS xxi
of the anatomical collections at the National Museum of Health and Medicine, Armed Forces
Institute of Pathology. In 1998, he was the first forensic scientist to be appointed as a Disaster
Mortuary Operational Response Team (DMORT) regional commander. He has worked in
different capacities in several major disasters, but always seeks to incorporate forensic
anthropological methods to the disaster response. His current position involves coordinat-
ing local, state, and federal resources for transportation disaster victim identification.
The late Dr. John Smialek graduated from the University of Toronto School of Medicine.
Dr. Smialek worked in forensic medicine with the Province of Ontario, Thunder Bay,
Canada, and Office of the Medical Examiner of Wayne County in Detroit before becoming
Chief Medical Examiner for the State of New Mexico and subsequently for the State of
Maryland. He also held positions with Medical Schools at the University of Maryland and
Johns Hopkins. He was active in teaching and research initiatives in forensic medicine
with special emphasis on sudden infant death.
O. C. SMITH, M.D.
Conscience and Science in Medicine
Memphis, TN 38104-2106
Dr. Smith received his M.D. from the Medical College of Wisconsin in 1978. He received train-
ing in Anatomic, Clinical, and Forensic Pathology at the University of Tennessee, Memphis,
followed by board certification in these three areas in 1983. Dr. Smith received training in
forensic firearms examination in 1985 and was the medical examiner for Shelby County,
Tennessee. His focus in forensic pathology in civilian life and the Naval Reserve involves the
biomechanics of skeletal, ballistic, and blast injury, burns, and aircraft mishap investigation.
Dr. Snow received his Ph.D. from the University of Arizona. Since 1979, after retiring from the
Federal Aviation Administration, he has served as an independent consultant for over 3,000
cases in forensic anthropology. His cases include the 1979 American Airlines DC-10 crash in
Chicago, the John Wayne Gacy serial murders, and the Green River murders. In 1985, he
headed a team of U.S. forensic scientists who went to Brazil to aid in the identification of the
skeleton of the notorious Nazi war criminal, Dr. Josef Mengele. In 1995, he directed the
anthropological phase of the identification of the 168 victims of Murrah Building bombing in
Oklahoma City. In 1984, Dr. Snow began his human rights work when he traveled to
Argentina to assist in determining the fate of thousands of Argentines who were abducted,
tortured, and murdered by military “Death Squads” between 1976 and 1983. He has served
on similar missions in over twenty countries, including UN-sponsored missions to the former
xxii ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS
Yugoslavia to collect forensic evidence to be used in war crimes trials. In 1992, he made
several trips to Iraqi Kurdistan to exhume mass graves of an estimated 200,000 Kurds killed
during the genocidal “Anfal” campaign conducted by Iraqi forces against their own Kurdish
people. In November 2007, he presented his findings as an expert witness for the prosecution
in the trial of Saddam Hussein and his co-defendants in Baghdad.
Dr. Steadman received her M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Chicago. She is currently
an Associate Professor at Binghamton University, SUNY. Dr. Steadman is a Diplomate of
the American Board of Forensic Anthropology and serves as a forensic anthropology con-
sultant to the Iowa Office of the State Medical Examiner, Suffolk County Medical
Examiner, and several other New York agencies. Her research interests are in bioarchaeol-
ogy, forensic anthropology, and human rights investigations. She has conducted excava-
tions and skeletal analyses of several historic and prehistoric archaeological sites in
Illinois, Iowa, and New York. Dr. Steadman has participated in human rights investiga-
tions in Argentina and Cyprus and currently works with Spanish archaeologists and
anthropologists to investigate atrocities committed during and after the Spanish Civil War.
Dr. Stout received his Ph.D. in Biological Anthropology from Washington University in
St. Louis, Missouri, in 1976. He is currently Professor Emeritus at the University of Missouri
and Professor at Ohio State University. His general research interests are in skeletal biology.
Specifically, his research involves the microstructural analysis of bone (histomorphometry)
and its applications in forensic anthropology, bioarchaeology, and paleontology.
Medical Examiner’s Office at the Regional Forensic Center for Shelby County, Tennessee.
Both his masters and doctoral degrees in physical anthropology were earned at the
University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Dr. Symes’ research interests involve human skeletal
biology with an emphasis on forensic tool mark and fracture pattern interpretation in
bone. His expertise is in sharp force trauma (i.e., saw and knife marks on bone and carti-
lage in instances of violent death involving dismemberment and mutilation). Other areas
of expertise include burned, blunt force, ballistic, and healing trauma in bone.
Johnie Webb assumed the duties as the Deputy to the Commander, U.S. Army Central
Identification Laboratory and Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command in 1994 and 2006,
respectively. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration from
Benedictine College, in Atchison, Kansas. Prior to entering Federal Government Civil
Service, he completed twenty-six years of service as an Army officer in the Quartermaster
Corps, retiring in 1994 with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. He is a Vietnam veteran and
has multiple personal awards and decorations. As an Army officer, Mr. Webb had extensive
duty with the Central Identification Laboratory. He was fortunate enough to lead the first
joint recovery operation into Vietnam in 1985 to recover the remains of missing Americans.
Allison Webb Willcox is a doctoral candidate in human skeletal biology at the University of
Pennsylvania. She has been on the faculty of the annual Armed Forces Institute of Pathology,
Forensic Anthropology Course for over ten years, and has been a member of the Disaster
xxiv ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS
Mortuary Operational Response Team (DMORT) since its inception in 1993. In addition to
forensic anthropology, her research interests include health and nutritional status in ancient
Egypt and the application of modern laboratory methods to skeletal remains.
Dr. Wiersema is Chair of the Harris County Medical Examiner’s Office (HCME) Mass
Fatality Committee, and a member of both the ID Unit and the HCME Grants Committee.
He holds an adjunct position at Texas A&M University and is a current member of the
American Academy of Forensic Sciences. Dr. Wiersema received his Ph.D. in Physical
Anthropology from Texas A&M University in 2006 with a research focus in radiographic
skeletal identification. His professional interests focus on mass fatality response and pre-
paredness. Dr. Wiersema has considerable experience working with different agencies in
recent mass disaster situations to provide a variety of services.
Dr. Willey is Professor of Anthropology at Chico State, where he has taught since 1989.
He served on the board of directors for the American Board of Forensic Anthropology,
supervised a morgue examining remains from mass graves in Iraq in 2004, and is a
consultant to the JPAC-Central Identification Laboratory, Hawaii. His research interests
include historic skeletal series and he has examined bones of Seventh Cavalry troopers
from the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
Mark Wilson is currently the Director of Forensic Science at Western Carolina University
in Cullowhee, NC. He previously served as the Biology Program Manager in the Chemical
Biological Sciences Unit and the mitochondrial DNA Program Manager in DNA Analysis
Unit II, FBI Laboratory, Quantico, VA. He retired from the FBI in 2007. He earned a Ph.D.
degree in Biosciences from George Mason University in Fairfax, VA, and a M.A. degree in
Biology from California State University, Fullerton. Dr. Wilson was instrumental in
developing mtDNA analysis for forensic use.
SECTION I
Personal Identification:
Theory and Applications
The Case Study Approach
I n the summer of 1990, four male friends entered an abandoned farmhouse in Iowa, but
only three emerged alive. While one stood watch outside, two of the men shot their
friend multiple times and threw his body into a well behind the farmhouse. It remained
there until it was recovered nearly a decade later. Could the last moments of his life be
interpreted from his mangled bones? In another part of the Midwest, an incomplete, disar-
ticulated female skeleton was found scattered along a riverbank. Two women of the same
age, height, and ancestry were missing from the area. How could experts determine
whether the handful of bones belonged to one woman or the other? Could this also be a
case of foul play?
No matter in what morose scenario unknown human remains are recovered, every
jurisdiction in the United States has statutes requiring a medicolegal investigation of the
identity of the individual and the circumstances of his or her death. By virtue of their
expertise in skeletal biology, forensic anthropologists may be called upon by law enforce-
ment agencies, coroners, medical examiners, and forensic pathologists to assist in the
recovery of human remains, conduct skeletal analyses for the purposes of identification,
describe the nature and extent of skeletal trauma, and potentially provide expert testi-
mony in a court of law. Forensic anthropological services are typically requested when
human remains are decomposed, burnt, fragmentary, cremated, dismembered, fully skele-
tonized, or otherwise unidentifiable by visual means. Scenarios in which a forensic anthro-
pologist may consult include burials, structural fires, explosions such as the Oklahoma
City bombing, mass graves, commercial and clandestine cremations, and mass fatality
incidents. The most recent examples of large-scale forensic anthropological involvement
are the recovery of victims of Hurricane Katrina and the identification of victims killed in
the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 (see Chapter 23). Increasingly, forensic anthro-
pologists are also expanding their purview beyond the local landscape and working
around the globe to identify soldiers missing in action and the victims of wars, human
rights atrocities, and mass disasters, such as the Asian tsunami of 2004.
Forensic anthropology is best defined as the application of anthropological and skeletal
biological principles to medicolegal issues. The term medicolegal refers to the capability of
medical science to shed light on legal matters, such as the identity of the deceased and the
circumstances of death (Fisher 2000). Skeletal biology is the study of the human skeleton
2 PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
Although prominent anthropologists have practiced forensic anthropology since the 1920s
and 1930s (see Kerley 1978; Komar and Buikstra 2008; Stewart 1979; Ubelaker 1990, 1999,
2000 for historical reviews), the profession was formalized in the United States in 1972 with
the formation of the Physical Anthropology section of the American Academy of Forensic
Sciences (AAFS). The AAFS is the primary professional organization of forensic science in
the United States and currently consists of ten professional sections, listed below. As of this
writing, there are over 300 members of the Physical Anthropology section.
Criminalistics
Odontology
Questioned Documents
Toxicology
Jurisprudence
Engineering
Pathology/Biology
Physical Anthropology
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
General
Over the past few decades, many anthropologists have received specialized training
in forensic methods in addition to their general anthropological education. This trend con-
tinues today as more and more institutions are developing formal graduate programs or
PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS 3
Forensic anthropologists must remember that their reports, testimony, and conduct can
have immediate and long-term ramifications for defendants, families, and the judicial
process as a whole. Thus, in addition to strict adherence to scientific principles and profes-
sional protocols, it is imperative that forensic anthropologists also demonstrate a strong
ethical commitment to their work.
Ethical issues underlie all professional actions, many of which go well beyond normal
scientific issues. For instance, forensic anthropologists are obligated to report all of their
findings, even if they seem contradictory to other lines of evidence or muddy a good time-
line or investigative theory (though see Gill-King’s poignant story in Chapter 4). Forensic
anthropologists are required to keep their cases confidential and not present cases in public
or even private settings until they have been legally resolved. They also have a responsibil-
ity to protect the identity of the victims and their families when their cases are presented for
educational purposes. That said, it should be stated that all of the cases presented in this
book have been legally resolved. Further, most authors in this volume have changed or
omitted the names of the victims. However, real names are used in a few chapters because
the cases have been presented elsewhere, including nationally televised programs, or per-
mission has been granted by appropriate parties.
It may be useful here to distinguish between evidence and the individual, as these
terms are used throughout the text of this book. Evidence can be defined as any object
or statement by a witness that has bearing in a court of law. According to Fisher (2000),
evidence can take two forms: testimonial and physical (real) evidence. “Testimonial
evidence is evidence given in the form of statements made under oath, usually in
response to questioning. Physical evidence is any type of evidence having an objective
existence, that is, anything with size, shape, and dimension” (Fisher 2000:1). Further,
physical evidence is used to “reconstruct the crime, identify participants, or confirm or
discredit an alibi” (Geberth 1996:169). Thus, just like blood spatter or a discarded weapon
at a crime scene, a lesion on a humerus that was used to determine the identity of an
individual or a cut mark on a rib suggestive of the circumstances of death constitute
“evidence.” However, forensic anthropologists never lose sight of the fact that an indi-
vidual skeleton with which they work is just that, an individual. The evidence gleaned
from the bones of an individual can be presented as such in court, but this application
does not detract from the fact that the person was once a living human being who had a
history, family, and unique identity. The very fact that forensic anthropologists interpret
the life history of a person from their bones argues that they are extraordinarily cognizant
of the relationship between “bones” and “individuals.”
This text is divided into six thematic sections representing the most common areas of case-
work and research in forensic anthropology. Section overviews introduce the chapters
and provide contextual information about the applications of forensic anthropology and
specific forensic techniques and approaches.
Section I provides a series of cases that exemplify the basic methods of personal identifi-
cation in forensic anthropology and are discussed below. An essential difference between
forensic anthropology and other subdisciplines of biological anthropology is that forensic
anthropologists must prepare scientifically valid legal records in the form of case reports, and
competently present their results in judicial proceedings. Thus, their methods and reports
undergo critical review by their peers as well as non-scientific parties in a court of law.
PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS 5
The chapters in Section II further examine the roles and responsibilities of the forensic anthro-
pologist in the courtroom.
Section III explores the methods utilized to detect and recover human remains. Since
humans have devised a number of peculiar methods to dispose of a body, it is difficult to
predict just when and where human remains might be found. Forensic anthropologists
must have archaeological training to assist law enforcement with the recovery of human
remains from a number of different contexts. Basic outdoor search strategies are discussed
in the section overview, while the chapters provide specific examples of recovery tech-
niques for a variety of locales. Included in this section are two chapters that cover the efforts
of the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command-Central Identification Laboratory (JPAC-
CIL) to recover and identify missing service and civilian men and women in past conflicts
around the world.
The chapters in Section IV collectively provide an overview of how forensic anthro-
pologists interpret perimortem trauma and major taphonomic processes from skeletal
remains. Two chapters provide an excellent overview of the three types of trauma
forensic anthropologists most often encounter—gunshot wounds, sharp force trauma,
and blunt trauma. These chapters also illustrate how anthropologists and pathologists
work together to interpret trauma in both soft tissue and bone when human remains
are decomposed. Blunt trauma is also discussed in a heart-wrenching case of child
abuse. One hallmark of child abuse is the presence of multiple trauma of differing ages
so the authors incorporate histological techniques to establish the timing of particular
injuries. Other cases illustrate how taphonomic principles can be utilized to estimate
the postmortem interval (PMI) and establish the context of human bones found in
unusual locations.
Section V on analytical methods demonstrates how forensic anthropologists use sophis-
ticated equipment and techniques to address special problems. For instance, when only
small fragments of bone are available, certain parameters of the biological profile can be
determined from the microstructure of bone (histomorphology), or identity may be estab-
lished through genetic and anthropological analysis. Experiments can be conducted to repli-
cate tool mark characteristics in bone in order to reconstruct prior postmortem trauma or
answer questions about the antiquity of an individual. Techniques presented in these case
studies include histomorphology, various facial reproduction procedures, mitochondrial
DNA analysis, cut mark analysis, and mass spectrometry.
Finally, Section VI provides some insight into the broad applications and current direc-
tions of forensic anthropology. Two applications are presented—mass fatality events and
international human rights investigations. The Disaster and Mortuary Operational
Response Team (DMORT) is under the Department of Health and Human Services and
serves to activate forensic anthropologists in mass casualty situations, such as transporta-
tion disasters, bombings, and floods. Finally, two chapters from the Equipo Argentino de
Antropología Forense (EAAF), or Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team, demonstrate the
ongoing work to identify the disappeared in Argentina, as well as their global efforts to
investigate human rights atrocities.
SECTION I CHAPTERS
The cases presented by the multidisciplinary authors in this section demonstrate a variety
of difficult challenges, particularly related to the identification process. In Chapter 1,
Steadman joins New York State Police Investigator Steve Andersen to present an overview
of the basic principles of forensic anthropology and the methods employed in developing
a biological profile within the context of a real forensic case.
6 PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION:THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
In Chapter 2, Douglas Ubelaker and colleagues present a case concerning the identifi-
cation of the dismembered remains of a young woman that were found in several different
locations. Scientific investigators were confronted with the task of constructing an accurate
biological profile and determining how she died when only incomplete and fragmentary
remains were available. The case also demonstrates the importance of multidisciplinary
cooperation. The authors, including a forensic anthropologist, a pathologist, a radiologist,
and a molecular geneticist, each report on the important contributions they made to the
identification process. If any of these specialists had not been involved in the investigation,
the case might not have been resolved in such a timely manner.
Karen Burns presents a case in Chapter 3 in which communication among forensic
experts broke down, turning a relatively straightforward identification into a lengthy and
nearly disastrous predicament. The process of identification is also detailed in this chapter,
including the description of antemortem pathologies and anomalies within the skeleton
that rendered an accurate description of a biological profile nearly impossible. Burns
provides some perspectives as to why interdisciplinary cooperation in this case failed and
some suggestions for how to avoid such situations in the future.
This section also examines the impact of missing loved ones on surviving family
members. In Chapter 4, Gill-King discusses the evolving technique of computer super-
imposition in a heartbreaking case from Texas. While he deftly demonstrates the
comparative points useful for identification, the impact of the story lies in the ethical
dilemma presented by the “incidental” information the anthropologist can garner
from skeletal remains. Sometimes the bones tell secrets that are not meant to be shared.
Gill-King takes a poignant look at biological paternity and ethical issues concerning if,
when, and how potentially harmful incidental information should be released to family
members. Finally, the daughter of an Air Force captain who was classified as Missing in
Action in Vietnam joins forensic anthropologist Ann Bunch in Chapter 5 to portray the
oscillation between heartache, when a loved one is missing, and hope during the identi-
fication process.
REFERENCES
Fisher, Barry A. J. 2000. Techniques of Crime Scene Steadman, Dawnie W., and William D. Haglund. 2005.
Investigation. 6th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. The scope of anthropological contributions to human
Geberth, Vernon J. 1996. Practical Homicide Investigation: rights investigations. Journal of Forensic Sciences
Tactics, Procedures and Forensic Techniques. 3rd ed. Boca 50(1):1–8.
Raton, FL: CRC Press. Stewart, T. Dale. 1979. Essentials of Forensic Anthropology.
Grisbaum, Gretchen A., and Douglas H. Ubelaker. 2001. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
An Analysis of Forensic Anthropology Cases Submitted to Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1990. J. Lawrence Angel and the
the Smithsonian Institution by the Federal Bureau of development of forensic anthropology in the United
Investigation from 1962 to 1994. Washington, DC: States. Pp. 191–200 in A Life in Science: Papers in
Smithsonian Institution Press. Honor of J. Lawrence Angel, ed. Jane E. Buikstra.
Kerley, Ellis R. 1978. Recent developments in forensic Center for American Archaeology, Scientific
anthropology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology Papers 6.
21:160–173. Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1999. Ales Hrdlicka’s role in the
Komar, Debra, and Jane E. Buikstra. 2008. Forensic history of forensic anthropology. Journal of Forensic
Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Practice. New Sciences 44:724–730.
York: Oxford University Press. Ubelaker, Douglas H. 2000. Methodological considerations
Ousley, Stephen D., and Richard L. Jantz. 2005. Fordisc 3.0: in the forensic applications of human skeletal biology.
Personal Computer Forensic Discriminant Functions. Pp. 41–67 in Biological Anthropology of the Human
Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Skeleton, ed. M. Anne Katzenberg and Shelley R.
Owsley, Douglas W., and Richard L. Jantz, eds. 1994. Saunders. New York: Wiley-Liss.
Skeletal Biology in the Great Plains: Migration, Warfare, Verano, John W., and Douglas H. Ubelaker, eds. 1992.
Health, and Subsistence. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Disease and Demography in the Americas. Washington,
Institution Press. DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS 7
FURTHER READING
Bass, Bill, and Jon Jefferson. 2003. Death’s Acre: Inside the Rhine, Stanley. 1998. Bone Voyage: A Journey in Forensic
Legendary Forensic Lab The Body Farm Where the Dead Anthropology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New
Do Tell Tales. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons. Mexico Press.
Fairgrieve, Scott I., ed. 1999. Forensic Osteological Analysis: Scheuer, Louise, and Sue Black. 2004. The Juvenile
A Book of Case Studies. Springfield, IL: Charles Skeleton. London: Elsevier Academic Press.
C. Thomas. Schwartz, Jeffrey H. 1993. What the Bones Tell Us. Tucson,
Joyce, Christopher, and Eric Stover. 1991. Witnesses from AZ: University of Arizona Press.
the Grave: The Stories Bones Tell. Boston, MA: Little, Siegel, Jay, Pekka J. Saukko, and Geoffrey C. Knupfer,
Brown & Company. eds. 2000. Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences. Orlando,
Kieser, Jules A., Wayne Laing, and Peter Herbison. 2006. FL: Academic Press.
Lessons learned from large-scale comparative dental Spencer, Frank, ed. 1997. History of Physical Anthropology.
analysis following the south Asian tsunami of 2004. 2nd ed. New York and London: Garland Publishing,
Journal of Forensic Sciences 51:109–112. Inc.
Mann, Robert, and Miryam Williamson. 2006. Forensic Ubelaker, Douglas H., and Henry Scammell. 1992. Bones:
Detective: How I Cracked the World’s Toughest Cases. A Forensic Detective’s Casebook. New York: Edward
New York: Ballentine. Burlingame Books.
Maples, William R., and Michael Browning. 1994. Dead Warren, Michael W., Heather A. Walsh-Haney, and
Men Do Tell Tales: The Strange and Fascinating Cases of a Laurel Freas, eds. 2008. The Forensic Anthropology
Forensic Anthropologist. New York: Doubleday. Laboratory. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Rathbun, Ted A., and Jane E. Buikstra. 1984. Human
Identification: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology.
Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
CHAPTER 1
In early April, 1997 shots rang out from a quiet rural December 8, 2001, when a hunter phoned the local
area of upstate New York. A man attacked his sheriff and stated he had found a human skeleton.
daughter in their house and shot at her with a shot- Hunters often find missing people given that they
gun. The woman was able to get to her car and visit remote areas that are relatively untouched
attempted to drive away but the man caught up to much of the year, except for hunters and people who
her and shot her once through the car door, fatally wish to hide human remains. The New York State
wounding her. In the mean time, the woman’s Police were called to investigate the scene and they
brother ran to a neighbor’s house and called police. asked Steadman to help with the recovery and iden-
The man ran into the woods behind his house and, tification of the skeleton.
despite a massive manhunt, was not seen again. The remains were on the ground under a great
This case became something of a legend in the deal of leaf litter. Once the leaves had been cleared,
region given the notoriety of the missing suspect, the remains and associated evidence could be seen
Marty Miller (not his real name). A tall man known (Figure 1.1). The skeleton was fully clothed in a black
for his quick temper and flair for bar fights, the jacket, jeans, leather belt, and boots. A shotgun laid
community was also aware of his family situation. along the left side of the body and shotgun shells
Marty’s daughter was also his common-law wife were between the legs. Personal effects located
and Marty had three more children with her. The around the body included eye glasses with broken
death of his daughter was mourned in the commu- lenses, a wrist watch, a partial pack of cigarettes, and
nity but there was also a feeling of apprehension. a wooden pipe. The skeleton was lying supine next
Marty was an avid outdoorsman and knew how to to a tree, though the upper half of the body was
survive in the forest. As a fugitive, Marty could be twisted to the left such that both arms were on the
quite dangerous and people feared where and left side of the body. The hands were disarticulated
when he might reappear. As time went on, Marty and the lower arm bones were bleached white by the
even became a bit of a boogeyman since parents sun where they extended from the coat sleeves. The
told their children not to go too deep into the forest skull was highly fragmented and small pieces were
because “Marty will get you!” found all around the body (Figure 1.2). Some of the
Four years passed without any word or sign from bones were transported away from the body by ani-
Marty and the case had gone cold. This changed on mals. The sacrum was found approximately 50 feet
8
THE MARTY MILLER CASE: INTRODUCING FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY 9
Patella
Tibia
Fibula
Tarsals
Metatarsals
Phalanges
Periosteum
Diaphysis
FIGURE 1.3 SOME BONES OF THE ADULT
SKELETON
Medullary Cavity
A basic rule of anatomy is that form follows func-
tion. Indeed, the structure and morphology of bones Endosteum
are well-adapted for their functions, including sup-
port and movement of the body, protection of vital
organs, hemopoiesis (blood cell production), and Spongy Bone
mineral storage. A closer examination of bone archi-
Compact Bone
tecture will help demonstrate the relationship
between the form and function of cortical and
Metaphysis
spongy bone (Figure 1.4). A long bone is divided into
three sections—the diaphysis, or shaft, two or more
Epiphysis
epiphyses located at the ends of the long bone, and
the metaphysis, a section of bone between the epiph-
ysis and diaphysis. A layer of tough connective tis-
sue, known as the periosteum, envelops the outer FIGURE 1.4 ANATOMY OF A LONG BONE
THE MARTY MILLER CASE: INTRODUCING FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY 11
CASE STUDY:
Inventory
In the case from New York, several bones were missing due to animal activity. The recovered elements
were laid out in anatomical position (Figure 1.6) after cleaning with a toothbrush and water. No soft tissue
was present. Note that the sacrum and os coxa, which were exposed to the sun, are whiter in color than the
bones that were largely covered by leaf litter where the skeleton was found. The highly fragmented and
FIGURE 1.6 CASE SKELETON LAID OUT IN ANATOMICAL POSITION (RECOVERED SKULL FRAGMENTS IN INSET)
incomplete elements of the skull and mandible are shown in the inset. None of the skeletal elements were
redundant and the remains are consistent with a single individual. Following a complete inventory, a
biological profile of the individual can be constructed.
“evidence” recorded in the bones to determine iden- Sex The pelvis is considered the most sexually
tity and the circumstances of his or her demise. To dimorphic skeletal element in humans because the
accomplish this, forensic anthropologists begin by female pelvis must accommodate the relatively
establishing a biological profile of the skeleton— large head of an infant during childbirth—a func-
the sex, age, ancestry, and stature, as well as any tion obviously not shared by males. Thus, the
skeletal anomalies or pathologies that make an indi- female pelvis is typically wider in every dimension
vidual unique. than the male pelvis (Figures 1.7 and 1.8).
THE MARTY MILLER CASE: INTRODUCING FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY 13
Female Male
Male
Female
Particular features to examine include the presence the function of the skull does not vary between
of a ventral arc, ischiopubic ridge, and preauricular males and females, only general differences are
sulcus, as well as the breadth of the sciatic notch observed in the size of the muscle attachments and
and subpubic concavity (Bennett 1993; Phenice the shape of certain features. Males tend to have
1969; Sutherland and Suchey 1991). Table 1.1 lists larger neck muscles than females, which means that
some of the more useful sex discriminating skeletal the bony areas where those muscles attach must be
traits of the pelvis. correspondingly robust. For example, one of the
Though the pelvis is considered to be the most muscles on the side of the neck, the sternocleido-
reliable skeletal indicator of sex, the cranium is also mastoid muscle, originates on the clavicle and
sexually dimorphic in many populations. Because sternum and inserts on the mastoid process of the
temporal bone, just behind the ear. When both the more square and pronounced, while the gonial
left and right muscles contract, they pull the mas- angle of females is more obtuse and their chins
toid process (and hence the head) forward and are generally more pointed than square. Skeletal
down towards the chest. Unilateral contraction biologists cannot offer good explanations as to
moves the head to one side. Adhering to the rule why such variation exists but they are nonethe-
that form follows function, an individual with a less useful for discriminating between the sexes
large sternocleidomastoid muscle will have a larger in skeletal material.
mastoid process than an individual with relatively Note that most of the differences between the
smaller muscle mass. Thus, the mastoid processes traits listed in Tables 1.1 and 1.2 are relative. For
of males tend to be wider and longer than those of instance, the greater sciatic notch is “wider” in
females (Figure 1.9). The same general rule applies females than in males, while the glabella is “more
to the muscles on the back of the neck (nuchal mus- pronounced” in males than in females. There is a
cles) that attach to the nuchal crest of the occipital great deal of overlap between the sexes in all of these
(Figure 1.10). traits, including those of the pelvis, and some popu-
There are other important sex-related differ- lations are more sexually dimorphic than others.
ences of the cranium (Table 1.2). For instance, the Thus, it is crucial to understand the sex-related vari-
superior margins of the orbit, called the supraor- ability within and among populations in order to
bital margins, tend to be thin and sharp in accurately estimate this parameter of the biological
females and thick and blunt in males. The jaw profile. Estimation of the sex of children based on the
line (gonial angle) and chin of males are often same morphological traits of the pelvis or cranium as
Male
Female
Small Pronounced
Supraorbital Supraorbital
Ridge Ridge
Thick, Long
Small Mastoid Mastoid Process
Process
Straight Gonial Angle
Obtuse Gonial
Angle
Male
Female
Gracile
Nuchal Robust
Crests Nuchal
Crests
are used for adults is unreliable because the female Age SUBADULT Your skeleton appears different
pelvis does not widen, or deviate from the male now than when you were born, and it will certainly
form, until after puberty. look different in fifty years. The estimation of age at
Measurements of the skull and postcranial death from skeletal materials is based on morpho-
skeleton are also useful for assessing sex. Bennett logical changes in the skeleton over time. The devel-
(1993) and France (1998) present a synthesis of opment of the skeleton and teeth is useful for
measurements and statistical sectioning points use- estimating the age of subadults (infants, children,
ful for sex estimation. Summary data can also be and teenagers). Longitudinal growth occurs at the
found in Krogman and Iscan (1986) and Stewart epiphyseal growth plate, a section of hyaline carti-
(1979). Notably, Giles and Elliot (1963) developed lage between the epiphysis and metaphysis of long
discriminant functions for cranial data from the bones (Figure 1.11). Cartilage cells, called chondro-
nineteenth-century Terry collection, though cytes, proliferate and eventually die, thereby form-
changes in the size and shape of crania over time ing a cartilaginous matrix upon which osteoblasts
(secular changes) have limited their utility. Walker (bone forming cells) lay down bone. The bone
(2008) has published discriminant function analy- lengthens at both ends as this process continues.
sis for a series of cranial observations (including Longitudinal growth cannot continue indefinitely,
the mental eminence and supraorbital ridge), however, or we would all be giants. A hormone
though warns that the equations are likely popula- secreted from the pituitary gland, called the growth
tion specific. Measurements of the humerus, femur, hormone, determines the rate and duration of bone
and tibia can outperform those of the cranium in growth. When the growth hormone is “turned off,”
discriminating between the sexes of some popula- the growth plate ossifies, the epiphysis fuses to the
tions (e.g., Bennett 1993; Dittrick and Suchey 1986; metaphysis, and longitudinal growth ceases.
Thieme and Schull 1957). Fortunately for anthropologists, the growth plates of
CASE STUDY:
Sex Assessment
As mentioned above, the pelvis is the most reliable skeletal region for sex estimation but only the right
ilium was present for analysis. The greater sciatic notch was quite narrow and there was no preauricular
sulcus, suggesting male sex. The nuchal crests, mastoid processes, and glabella were robust and the supra-
orbital margins were thick. In addition, the maximum diameters of the femoral and humeral heads were
50 mm and 49 mm, respectively, which are well within the male range of variation (Stewart 1979). All of
these characteristics are consistent with a male individual.
16 PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
FIGURE 1.11 LONG BONES OF INDIVIDUALS AT DIFFERENT AGES (INFANT, SUBADULT, AND ADULT)
each bone turn off at different times, yet the timing at all (agenesis). Thus, skeletal biologists can accu-
of epiphyseal fusion for any one growth plate is rel- rately estimate subadult age from the dentition
atively constant across populations. Therefore, between infancy and approximately fifteen years,
anthropologists can compare the observed pattern when the second molars erupt and their roots are
of epiphyseal fusion of an unknown skeleton to completely developed. Schour and Massler (1941,
modern growth standards. A general chart is pre- 1944) and Ubelaker (1999) have developed charts
sented in Figure 1.12, though more specific informa- of dental eruption patterns at different ages that
tion can be found in Scheuer and Black (2000). are commonly used by forensic anthropologists.
Female skeletons will typically mature faster than Dental formation is considered more accurate
those of males (Saunders 2000). There may be some than eruption patterns for chronological age esti-
population differences as well, and childhood mal- mation (Ubelaker 1989). Here, observations of
nutrition may negatively impact skeletal growth crown and root development are used to estimate
and development (Cardoso 2008). chronological age from prenatal to late teens
The formation and eruption of teeth are also (Moorrees et al. 1963a, b). Dental histological aging
useful for estimating the age of subadult skele- techniques are also available, and Fitzgerald and
tons. Humans are diphodont, meaning they have Rose (2000) provide an excellent review of these
two sets of teeth. The deciduous, or “baby,” teeth techniques. Because there is relatively little vari-
begin to erupt in infancy while eruption of adult, ability in dental development and epiphyseal
“permanent,” teeth commences during middle fusion among populations, age ranges of two to
childhood, typically around the age of seven five years may be estimated for subadult remains.
years. Dental development terminates in the late Recent studies (Cardoso 2008; Heuzé and Cardoso
teens or early twenties with the eruption (and/or 2008) have shown that socioeconomic factors play
extraction) of the third molars, or “wisdom teeth.” a role in population variation in that children with
The timing of third molar eruption is highly vari- lower socioeconomic status may developmentally
able, and some individuals do not develop them lag behind their more affluent cohort. No matter
THE MARTY MILLER CASE: INTRODUCING FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY 17
Ventral Dorsal
FIGURE 1.13 COMPARISON OF PUBIC SYMPHYSIS OF A YOUNG, MIDDLE AGED, AND OLDER ADULT
Again, a broad age range is the best we can expect police investigators, it is the responsibility of the
from this technique given the variability of age- anthropologist to explain that excessively narrow
related changes in adults. age ranges may result in the inappropriate exclusion
Other aging techniques employed by forensic of missing persons from consideration.
anthropologists include the examination of the Forensic anthropologists must also be able to
sternal end of the right fourth rib (Iscan and Loth communicate to the court a sense of the accuracy of
1986a, b) and cranial suture closure (Meindl and skeletal age and sex estimations. Most authors
Lovejoy 1985). The sternal rib ends can yield quite include an estimate of accuracy and reliability in the
reliable age estimations (Saunders et al. 1992), and seminal articles that describe their techniques. For
adjacent ribs can be used without losing informa- instance, Phenice (1969) reports an accuracy of
tion (Yoder et al. 2001). However, debate continues 96 percent when the ventral arc, ischiopubic ramus,
concerning the utility of cranial suture closure as and subpubic concavity are analyzed together to
an accurate age indicator (Meindl and Lovejoy estimate sex. However, it is important to be familiar
1985; Nawrocki 1998; Singer 1953), and most agree with “blind” studies designed to test the accuracy
that the best it can render is a fifteen-year age and reliability of the methods (e.g., Hoppa 2000;
range. Nonetheless, a forensic anthropologist has Mulhern and Jones 2005; Murray and Murray 1991;
little choice but to use cranial sutures when only Saunders et al. 1992). Lovell (1989) and others
the skull is present. Histological aging methods for (e.g., Ubelaker and Volk 2002) applied the Phenice
bones and teeth are also available and are very use- technique to skeletal samples of known age and sex
ful for aging burnt and extremely fragmentary but obtained an accuracy below 90 percent.
materials (Ericksen 1991; Kerley and Ubelaker Ubelaker and Volk (2002) further found that the
1978; Prince and Ubelaker 2002; Robling and Stout accuracy of sex estimation increased substantially
2000; Stout 1992; Ubelaker 1986; see Chapter 19). (from 88.4 percent to 96.5 percent) when additional
In casework, forensic anthropologists use as pelvic morphological indicators (e.g., sciatic notch
many aging techniques as are available and then and preauricular sulcus) were incorporated with
reconcile the results of each method into an appro- Phenice’s traits. Further, they argue that observer
priate age range, which may be quite broad (e.g., ten experience is also a key factor in accurate sex estima-
years or more). While a wide range may frustrate tion. Thus, forensic anthropologists should test and
THE MARTY MILLER CASE: INTRODUCING FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY 19
quantify their own proficiency for various methods forensic anthropologists must reflect the everyday
using unfamiliar skeletons of known age and sex. usage of the society with which they interact” (Sauer
1992:109). In practice, however, ancestry estimation
Ancestry Biological anthropology is histori- may make little statistical contribution to a discrimi-
cally rooted in raciology, a typological approach to natory biological profile unless the individual is
human variation in which individuals are segre- truly a minority within the relevant population at
gated into discrete groups based on the relative large (e.g., a particular geographic area) (Konigsberg
frequency of particular physical traits. However, et al. 2008).
the approach today is no longer typological in For cases in which ancestry might be discrimi-
nature and biological anthropologists are now natory and therefore assist with personal identifi-
interested in understanding the range of variation cation, forensic anthropologists first look to the
within and between groups without necessarily cranium. Forensic anthropologists examine mor-
creating artificial boundaries between them. In phological features of the skull and collect cranial
general, anthropologists argue that race (white, measurements, which are then statistically com-
black, Hispanic, Chinese, etc.) is a social construct pared to skulls of known ancestry. Morphological
that has no biological basis (Brace 1995; Lewontin features typically examined include the overall
1972; Marks 1995; Montagu 1964). The term shape of the skull vault, orbits, palate, and nasal
ancestry, on the other hand, takes into account aperture, as well as the presence or absence of cer-
population origins and history, which do have bio- tain characteristics, including Wormian bones (or
logical foundations. According to Ousley and ossicles, bones within the sutures) and a nasal sill.
Jantz (1996), biological differences “reflect the dif- Many other morphological features are listed in
ferent origins and separate histories of each [popu- various anthropology papers and books (e.g., Gill
lation], which can be highly correlated with many 1998; Gill and Rhine 1990; Stewart 1979).
social, geographic, temporal, historical, or linguis- Although a variety of discriminant function
tic groupings of populations. These correlations analyses have been developed for cranial measure-
form the basis of the study of human variation and ments (e.g., Giles and Elliot 1962), forensic anthro-
of forensic anthropology.” pologists rely on metric data from the Forensic
Forensic anthropologists have been criticized by Data Bank (FDB) for a comparative sample of mod-
other anthropologists for upholding the race ern individuals of known sex, ancestry, and stature.
concept whenever they estimate the ancestry of a Since 1983, forensic anthropologists from around
skeleton (e.g., Albanese and Saunders 2006; Belcher the country have contributed metric information
and Armelagos 2002). Sauer (1992) counters this from their cases when positive identifications
point by arguing that race must be discussed in are made. The Data Bank is maintained at
forensic reports since the goal of the analysis is iden- the University of Tennessee (Ousley and Jantz
tification. “To be of value the race categories used by 1998) and currently contains data on over 2,100
CASE STUDY:
Age Assessment
The skeleton recovered from upstate New York exhibited complete fusion of all of the epiphyses so adult aging
methods were employed. The available auricular surface was too damaged for analysis and the pubic sym-
physes were missing so only the cranial sutures and the right fourth sternal rib end could be utilized. The
Meindl and Lovejoy (1985) method was used to evaluate the vault sutures. Most of the vault sutures were
obliterated, though the left midlambdoid and midcoronal sutures were scored as “significant closure.” These
data suggested an age older than forty years. The sternal end of the right fourth rib was evaluated following
the methods of Iscan and Loth (1986a) and determined to be in Phase 6, which has an age range of forty-three
to fifty-five years. Thus, the skeletal data indicate an age over forty years but a more precise range could not be
reliably estimated.
20 PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
individuals, most of known sex and ancestry. The Stature An individual’s standing height is
FDB is often consulted to estimate the ancestry of also part of his or her biological profile. Since
an unknown individual using a program called average height differs between the sexes and
Fordisc, the most recent version of which is Fordisc among populations, forensic anthropologists esti-
3.0, written by Ousley and Jantz (2005). Fordisc mate living stature by measuring the long bones
works by treating the documented forensic cases in and applying sex- and population-specific regres-
the FDB as a comparative sample that can be used sion equations. Formulae are available for a num-
to classify unknown individuals from forensic ber of different populations, including World War
cases. The unknown is then classified by finding II and Korean War dead (Trotter 1970; Trotter and
the group to which the individual in question is Gleser 1952), as well as modern forensic samples
most similar. In discriminant function analysis, the (Ousley 1995). In addition, the appropriate meas-
statistical method used in Fordisc, posterior proba- urement techniques are found in several sources
bilities of group membership can be calculated for (e.g., Bass 1995; Moore-Jansen et al. 1994).
each group. These are called posterior probabilities Typically, measurements of the leg bones tend to
because they are calculated after (posterior to) be more reliable than those of the arms (Trotter
analysis of the bone measurements. Before evaluat- and Gleser 1958), but the forensic anthropologist
ing the measurements, there are prior probabilities must pay particular attention to the measurement
of group membership, which Fordisc assumes are protocol for the tibia. Jantz and colleagues (1994,
equal. In other words, if four groups are under 1995) describe how Trotter ’s measurements of
consideration, then the prior probability that the maximum tibial length do not correspond to the
case belongs to each group is 0.25. Following the measurement descriptions she provided and
analysis, the metric information from the case pre- results in the underestimation of living stature.
sumably modifies these priors so that (ideally) all All stature estimates should be reported as a
but one of the probabilities will become very small. range by including appropriate confidence inter-
These modified probabilities are the posterior vals (Giles and Klepinger 1988; Konigsberg et al.
probabilities of group membership; the higher the 1998; Ousley 1995). New statistical approaches to
posterior probability, the more likely the unknown stature estimation provide likelihood ratios that
case belongs to that group. can be useful to quantify identity, as further
Even when the posterior probabilities seem to discussed in Section II (see Konigsberg et al.
clearly and unambiguously assign an individual to a 1998, 2006).
single group, it is possible that the individual is not To establish a personal identification, stature
“typical” of that group. For example, if an unknown estimates derived from long bone measurements
cranium from a group not represented in the FDB are compared to statures recorded in medical
was analyzed using Fordisc (e.g., a Biaka Pygmy), records and/or driver’s licenses of potential
the program would still assign the cranium to a par- matches. However, self-reported height may not
ticular group, but the skull would probably not be always be accurate. For instance, Willey and
typical of that group. The probability of getting a Falsetti (1991) have found that many people, espe-
cranium that is similar to others in that group is cially men, tend to overstate their true stature on
called a “typicality probability” or “typicality their driver’s licenses. Further, Galloway (1988)
index” (McLachlan 1992; VanVark and Schaafsma reports that significant stature loss in elderly indi-
1992). Chapter 8 discusses Fordisc in greater detail viduals is often not recorded in medical records or
and provides examples. on driver’s licenses. In other words, older adults
CASE STUDY:
Ancestry Assessment
In the current case ancestry could not be assessed because the majority of the skull and facial skeleton were
too fragmentary and incomplete to observe traits or perform measurements.
THE MARTY MILLER CASE: INTRODUCING FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY 21
tend to report their more youthful stature. The extent of osteoarthritis and infections, particular
errors of self-reporting emphasize the need for trabecular patterns within a bone, and frontal
forensic anthropologists to report appropriate sta- sinus morphology. Comparisons of antemortem
tistical ranges so that a missing individual is not and postmortem radiographs may require the
falsely excluded from consideration. assistance of a radiologist, especially if the anthro-
pologist does not have extensive experience in
Antemortem Pathology For any particular case, a radiograph interpretation. The time elapsed
biological profile consisting of age, sex, ancestry, and between when a radiograph was taken and the
stature may not significantly reduce the number of death of the individual is also an important con-
missing individuals, especially in urban areas where sideration since significant bone remodeling may
the missing persons’ list is often quite lengthy modify or obscure lesions. Medical prosthetics
(Cunha 2006). Thus, the forensic anthropologist and surgical devices with serial numbers are also
must examine the bones carefully and note any useful for identification (Ubelaker and Jacobs
unique characteristics that will help exclude one or 1995). Similarly, dental pathologies and restora-
more individuals from the missing persons’ pool. tions, particularly fillings and crowns, can be used
Pathological conditions that occur before death are to identify human remains (e.g., Adams 2003;
called antemortem pathologies. However, for a Stimson and Mertz 1997).
pathology or anomaly to be forensically important, Certain habitual tasks will alter the biome-
an antemortem record must exist in the form of radi- chanical stresses placed on bone and provide the
ographs (X-rays), dental records, or medical records. anthropologist with clues as to the types of activ-
Individuals close to the missing person may also ities the individual might have performed in life
convey information about his or her medical history, (Kennedy 1989; Saul and Saul 1999; Wilczak and
even if records are not available. Ideally, information Kennedy 1998). For instance, in certain cultures
gathered from non-medical sources should be con- females spend a great deal of time kneeling or
sistent across multiple family members or friends. squatting while processing food. This habitual
The most common skeletal pathology encoun- activity alters the way the tibia and femur and
tered in forensic anthropology cases is bone the tibia and talus articulate, leaving distinct
fractures. These are especially useful since most accessory or modified facets on these bones—so
people seek medical care when a bone is broken called “squatting facets” (Kennedy 1989; Kostick
and radiographs are routinely ordered to diagnose 1963). Kennedy et al. (1986) determined that an
and treat the fractures. Anthropologists can com- Egyptian mummy, whose burial case inscriptions
pare the location and morphology of the fracture, suggested he or she was a scribe in life, indeed
including the amount of healing present, to the exhibited bony changes on one of the fingers of
specific site and date of fracture as recorded in the the right hand that was consistent with routinely
medical records (e.g., Klepinger 1999; Maples holding a stylus. When a forensic anthropolo-
1984). Chapter 16 discusses fracture repair and gist observes accessory facets, unilateral muscle
healing rates in more detail. development, or other unique markers of stress
Other more subtle bone disorders or unique on bone, he or she may be able to include a
characteristics observed on radiographs are also description of general activities that may have
forensically important, such as the location and contributed to these traits, such as pitching,
CASE STUDY:
Stature Assessment
Ousley’s (1995) regression formulae for white males (the default Steadman uses when ancestry is
unknown) were applied to the maximum femoral and tibial lengths measured using an osteometric board.
The stature was estimated to be 77 ⫾ 3 inches (6’2”–6’8”), indicating that this person was likely taller than
average.
22 PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
carrying heavy loads on the shoulder, or even subtle bony details may be helpful if several
writing. Though an occupational marker may missing individuals share otherwise similar
not lead directly to an identification, attention to biological profiles.
CASE STUDY:
Antemortem Pathologies
Antemortem pathologies shed a great deal of light on the life history of the individual recovered in upstate
New York. The skeleton exhibited a number of healed fractures of the right wrist and hand and left ribs, and
moderate osteoarthritic changes were observed in the shoulders, right hand, legs, and spine. The rib fractures
observed on left ribs 5–11 were vertically aligned on the lateral ribcage when placed in anatomical position
(Figure 1.14). The location and similar age of the calluses suggested that the fractures occurred at the same
time. The right ulnar styloid process exhibited a medial deviation due to a well-healed fracture (Figure 1.15)
and the scaphoid may also have been fractured. A well-healed fracture of the right fifth metacarpal exhibited
FIGURE 1.14 ANTEMORTEM FRACTURES OF RIGHT FIGURE 1.15 ANTEMORTEM FRACTURE OF THE RIGHT
RIBS 5–11 DISTAL ULNA
Note healed calluses (arrows) Note deviation of the styloid process (arrow)
bowing deformation that was consistent with a “Boxer’s fracture” in which the fist is closed during impact
(Galloway 1999; Jupiter and Belsky 1992). Only left portions of the mandible and maxilla were recovered and
both were edentulous (antemortem loss of all teeth).
THE MARTY MILLER CASE: INTRODUCING FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY 23
CASE STUDY:
Identification of Marty Miller
The biological profile indicated the remains were those of an older male, over forty years of age at death,
with a suite of antemortem fractures. This biological profile was consistent with that of Marty Miller, a white
male, approximately 6’4” tall, who was fifty-seven years old at the time of his disappearance. Miller’s med-
ical records and radiographs were gathered from a local hospital. All of the antemortem conditions
observed in the skeleton were accounted for in the X-rays and the dates of injuries were consistent with the
amount of healing observed in the skeleton. Steadman took postmortem X-rays of the skeletal injuries and
compared them to the antemorem radiographs, some of which were taken less than two months before
Miller disappeared. The location and degree of healing of the fifth metacarpal fracture and rib fractures
matched that of the antemortem radiographs. In addition, arthritic changes of the spine were observed on
an antemortem chest film. There were no inconsistencies between the antemortem and postmortem data. As
supporting evidence, clothing on the skeleton was identified as that worn by Miller on the day he killed his
daughter and disappeared. The forensic pathologist accepted the anthropological identification and a DNA
analysis was not ordered. The next step was to determine how and when Martin Miller died.
24 PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
bone trauma even when the remains are fleshed anthropologist can study the postmortem changes
or the identity of the individual is not an issue, and associated evidence (e.g., insects) to help esti-
such as pedestrian-vehicle collisions. Further, the mate the postmortem interval, or time since death.
CASE STUDY:
Resolution
The context of the recovery scene suggested that Miller took his own life but this had yet to be confirmed scien-
tifically. The State Police Investigators examined the pump action shotgun that was found by his side. The safety
was off, the action was closed and one expended shotgun slug casing was still present. Three more rounds were
in the magazine. This indicates a single shot was discharged and the weapon was not cycled further. One
expended slug casing had already been found at the car where the murder was committed so the firearms find-
ings indicated that the last slug was fired where the skeleton was found. The posterior vault of the cranium could
be reconstructed and demonstrated two defects in the superior right parietal (Figure 1.16). Both were semi-
circular defects with external beveling and are approximately 10 cm apart. The morphology of the defects are
consistent with exit wounds, likely of two or more fragments from the slug. The angles of the defects suggest the
FIGURE 1.16 SUPERIOR VIEW OF THE RIGHT PARIETAL (AT THE TOP OF THE HEAD)
Note defects (white arrows) with external beveling (black arrows)
slug entered the skull from the oral cavity or perhaps under the chin (DiMaio and DiMaio 2001). This
information, combined with the scene context and clothing, suggests that Miller killed himself on the same day
that he killed his daughter. Given the location of the body in the forest near the house and that no one heard the
gunshot suggests he committed the act immediately prior to the arrival of the police officers. The forensic pathol-
ogist concurred with the anthropological assessment and ruled the cause of death as gunshot trauma and the
manner of death as suicide. As a result, the death inquiries of both Marty Miller and his daughter were closed.
THE MARTY MILLER CASE: INTRODUCING FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY 25
females: A test of the Phase Method. Journal of Forensic Neandertal DNA sequences and the origin of modern
Sciences 31:990–999. humans. Cell 90:19–30.
Jantz, Richard L., David R. Hunt, and Lee Meadows. 1994. Krogman, Wilton Marion, and Mehmet Yasar Iscan. 1986.
Maximum length of the tibia: How did Trotter measure The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. 2nd ed.
it? American Journal of Physical Anthropology 93:525–528. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Jantz, Richard L., David R. Hunt, and Lee Meadows. Lewontin, R. C. 1972. The apportionment of human
1995. The measure and mismeasure of the tibia: diversity. Pp. 381–398 in Evolutionary Biology, ed. M.
Implications for stature estimation. Journal of Forensic K. Hecht and W. S. Steere. Vol. 6. New York: Plenum
Sciences 40:758–761. Press.
Jupiter, J. B., and M. R. Belsky. 1992. Fractures and dislo- Lovejoy, C. Owen, Richard Meindl, Thomas R. Pryzbeck,
cations of the hand. Pp. 925–1024 in Skeletal Trauma: and Robert P. Mensforth. 1985. Chronological meta-
Fractures, Dislocations, Ligamentous Injuries, ed. morphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: A new
B. D. Browner, J. B. Jupiter, A. M. Levine, and P. G. method for the determination of age at death.
Trafton. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68:15–28.
Katz, Darryl, and Judy M. Suchey. 1986. Age determina- Lovell, Nancy C. 1989. Test of Phenice’s visual sexing
tion of the male os pubis. American Journal of Physical technique for determining sex from the os pubis.
Anthropology 69:427–435. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 79:117–120.
Katz, Darryl, and Judy M. Suchey. 1989. Race differ- Maples, William R. 1984. The identifying pathology.
ences in pubic symphyseal aging patterns in the Pp. 363–356 in Human Identification: Case Studies in
male. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Forensic Anthropology, ed. Ted A. Rathbun and Jane E.
80:167–172. Buikstra. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Kennedy, Kenneth A. R. 1989. Skeletal markers of occu- Maples, William R. 1986. Trauma analysis by the forensic
pational stress. Pp. 129–160 in Reconstruction of Life anthropologist. Pp. 218–228 in Forensic Osteology:
from the Skeleton, ed. Mehmet Yasar Iscan and Kenneth Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, ed.
A. R. Kennedy. New York: Alan R. Liss. Kathleen J. Reichs. Springfield, IL: Charles C.
Kennedy, Kenneth A. R., Thomas Plummer, and John Thomas.
Chiment. 1986. Identification of the eminent dead: Marks, Jonathon. 1995. Human Biodiversity: Genes, Race
Penpi, a scribe of ancient Egypt. Pp. 290–307 in and History. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Forensic Osteology: The Recovery and Analysis of McKern, Thomas, and T. Dale Stewart. 1957. Skeletal Age
Unknown Skeletal Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs. Changes in Young American Males. Technical Report
Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. EP-45, Natick, MA: U.S. Army Quartermaster
Kerley, Ellis R., and Douglas H. Ubelaker. 1978. Research and Development Center, Environmental
Revisions in the microscopic method of estimating Protection Research Division.
age at death on human cortical bone. American Journal McLachlan, Geoffrey J. 1992. Discriminant Analysis and
of Physical Anthropology 49:545–546. Statistical Pattern Recognition. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Klepinger, Linda L. 1999. Unusual skeletal anomalies Meindl, Richard, and C. Owen Lovejoy. 1985. Ectocranial
and pathologies in forensic casework. Pp. 226–236 in suture closure: A revised method for the determination
Forensic Osteological Analysis: A Book of Case Studies, of skeletal age at death based on the lateral-anterior
ed. Scott I. Fairgrieve. Springfield, IL: Charles C. sutures. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Thomas. 68:57–66.
Konigsberg, Lyle W., Samantha M. Hens, Lee Meadows Montagu, Ashley, ed. 1964. Man’s Most Dangerous Myth:
Jantz, and William L. Jungers. 1998. Stature estima- The Fallacy of Race. 4th ed. Cleveland, OH: World Press.
tion and calibration: Bayesian and maximum likeli- Moore-Jansen, Peer M., Stephen D. Ousley, and Richard
hood perspectives in physical anthropology. Yearbook L. Jantz. 1994. Data Collection Procedures for Forensic
of Physical Anthropology Suppl 27(41):65–92. Skeletal Material. Reports of Investigations No. 48.
Konigsberg, Lyle W., Ann H. Ross, and William L. Department of Anthropology. Knoxville, TN:
Jungers. 2006. Estimation and evidence in forensic University of Tennessee.
anthropology: Determining stature. Pp. 317–331 in Moorrees, C. F. A., E. A. Fanning, and E. E. Hunt. 1963a.
Forensic Anthropology and Medicine: Complementary Formation and resorption of three deciduous teeth in
Sciences from Recovery to Cause of Death, ed. Aurore children. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Schmitt, Eugénia Cunha and João Pinheiro. Totowa, 21:205–213.
NJ: Humana Press. Moorrees, C. F. A., E. A. Fanning, and E. E. Hunt. 1963b.
Konigsberg, Lyle W., Bridget F. B. Algee-Hewitt, and Age variation of formation stages for 10 permanent
Dawnie Wolfe Steadman. In Press. Estimation and teeth. Journal of Dental Research 42:1490–1502.
evidence in forensic anthropology: Sex and race. Mulhern, Dawn M., and E. B. Jones. 2005. Test of the
American Journal of Physical Anthropology. revised method of age estimation from the auricular
Kostick, E. L. 1963. Facets and imprints on the upper and surface of the ilium. American Journal of Physical
lower extremities of femora from a western Nigerian Anthropology 126:61–65.
population. Journal of Anatomy 97:393–402. Murray, K. A., and T. Murray. 1991. A test of the auricular
Krings, Matthias, Anne Stone, R. W. Schmitz, H. surface aging technique. Journal of Forensic Sciences
Krainitzki, Mark Stoneking, and Svante Pääbo. 1997. 36:1162–1169.
THE MARTY MILLER CASE: INTRODUCING FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY 27
Nawrocki, Stephen. 1998. Regression formulae for esti- archaeological sample. Canadian Society of Forensic
mating age at death from cranial suture closure. Sciences Journal 25(2):97–118.
Pp. 276–292 in Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Scheuer, Louise, and Sue Black. 2000. Developmental
Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs. Juvenile Osteology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Schour, I., and M. Massler. 1941. The development of the
Ousley, Stephen D. 1995. Should we estimate “biologi- human dentition. Journal of the American Dental
cal” or forensic stature? Journal of Forensic Sciences Association 28:1153–1160.
40:768–773. Schour, I., and M. Massler. 1944. Development of the
Ousley, Stephen D., and Richard L. Jantz. 1996. Fordisc 2.0. Human Dentition. Chart, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL:
Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, American Dental Association.
Knoxville. Singer, Ronald. 1953. Estimation of age from cranial
Ousley, Stephen D., and Richard L. Jantz. 1998. The suture closure: A report on its unreliability. Journal of
Forensic Data Bank: Documenting skeletal trends in Forensic Medicine 1:52–59.
the United States. Pp. 441–457 in Forensic Osteology: Stewart, T. Dale. 1979. Essentials of Forensic Anthropology.
Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Kathleen J. Reichs. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Stimson, Paul G., and Curtis A. Mertz. 1997. Forensic
Thomas. Dentistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Ousley, Stephen D., and Richard L. Jantz. 2005. Fordisc 3.0: Stout, Sam D. 1992. Methods of determining age at
Personal Computer Forensic Discriminant Functions. death using bone microstructure. Pp. 21–35 in Skeletal
Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Biology of Past Peoples: Research Methods, ed. Shelley R.
Phenice, T. W. 1969. A newly developed visual method of Saunders and M. Anne Katzenberg. New York:
sexing the os pubis. American Journal of Physical Wiley-Liss.
Anthropology 30:297–302. Suchey, Judy Myers, and Darryl Katz. 1998. Applications
Prince, Debra A., and Douglas H. Ubelaker. 2002. of pubic age determination in a forensic setting.
Application of Lamendin’s adult dental aging tech- Pp. 204–236 in Forensic Osteology: Advances in the
nique to a diverse skeletal sample. Journal of Forensic Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs.
Sciences 47:107–116. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Robling, Alexander G., and Sam D. Stout. 2000. Sutherland, Leslie D., and Judy M. Suchey. 1991. Use of
Histomorphometry of human cortical bone: the ventral arc in pubic sex determination. Journal of
Applications to age estimation. Pp. 187–213 in Forensic Sciences 36(2):501–511.
Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton, ed. Thieme, Frederick P., and W. J. Schull. 1957. Sex discrimi-
M. Anne Katzenberg and Shelley R. Saunders. nation from the skeleton. Human Biology 29(3):242–273.
New York: Wiley-Liss. Todd, T. Wingate. 1921a. Age changes in the pubic bone I:
Sauer, Norman J. 1984. Manner of death: Skeletal evi- The white male pubis. American Journal of Physical
dence of blunt and sharp instrument wounds. Anthropology 3:285–334.
Pp. 176–184 in Human Identification: Case Studies in Todd, T. Wingate. 1921b. Age changes in the pubic bone
Forensic Anthropology, ed. Ted A. Rathbun and Jane E. III: The pubis of the white female, IV: The pubis of the
Buikstra. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. female White-Negro hybrid. American Journal of
Sauer, Norman J. 1992. Forensic anthropology and the Physical Anthropology 4:1–70.
concept of race: If races don’t exist, why are forensic Trotter, Mildred. 1970. Estimation of stature from intact
anthropologists so good at identifying them? Social long bones. Pp. 71–83 in Personal Identification in Mass
Science and Medicine 34(2):107–111. Disasters, ed. T. Dale Stewart. Washington, DC:
Sauer, Norman J. 1998. The timing of injuries and man- Smithsonian Institution Press.
ner of death: Distinguishing among antemortem, per- Trotter, Mildred, and Goldine C. Gleser. 1952. Estimation
imortem, and postmortem trauma. Pp. 321–332 in of stature from long bones of American Whites and
Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Negroes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs. 2nd ed. 10:463–514.
Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Trotter, Mildred, and Goldine C. Gleser. 1958. A
Saul, Julie Mather, and Frank P. Saul. 1999. Biker ’s re-evaluation of estimation of stature based on mea-
bones: An avocational syndrome. Pp. 237–250 in surements of stature taken during life and of long
Forensic Osteological Analysis: A Book of Case Studies, bones after death. American Journal of Physical
ed. Scott I. Fairgrieve. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Anthropology 16:79–123.
Thomas. Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1986. Estimation of age at death
Saunders, Shelley R. 2000. Subadult skeletons and from histology of human bone. Pp. 240–247 in Dating
growth-related studies. Pp. 135–161 in Biological and Age Determination of Biological Materials, ed. M. R.
Anthropology of the Human Skeleton, ed. M. Anne Zimmerman and J. Lawrence Angel. London: Croom
Katzenberg and Shelley R. Saunders. New York: Helm.
Wiley-Liss. Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1989. The estimation of age at
Saunders, Shelley R., C. Fitzgerald, T. Rogers, C. Dudar, death from immature human bone. Pp. 55–70 in Age
and H. McKillop. 1992. A test of several methods Markers in the Human Skeleton, ed. Mehmet Yasar
of skeletal age estimation using a documented Iscan. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
28 PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1999. Human Skeletal Remains: Fisher, Russell S. 1993. History of forensic pathology
Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. 3rd ed. Washington, and related laboratory sciences. Pp. 3–13 in Spitz and
DC: Taraxacum. Fisher’s Medicolegal Investigation of Death: Guidelines
Ubelaker, Douglas H., and Carl H. Jacobs. 1995. to the Application of Pathology to Crime Investigation,
Identification of orthopedic device manufacturer. ed. Werner U. Spitz. Springfield, IL: Charles C.
Journal of Forensic Sciences 40(2):168–170. Thomas.
Ubelaker, Douglas H., and Crystal G. Volk. 2002. A test of Iscan, Mehmet Yasar, and Kenneth A. R. Kennedy, eds.
the Phenice method for the estimation of sex. Journal 1989. Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton. New York:
of Forensic Sciences 47(1):19–24. Wiley-Liss.
VanVark, G. N., and W. Schaafsma. 1992. Advances in Jurmain, Robert. 1999. Stories From the Skeleton: Behavioral
the quantitative analysis of skeletal morphology. Reconstruction in Human Osteology. Amsterdam:
Pp. 225–257 in Skeletal Biology of Past Peoples: Gordon and Breach.
Research Methods, ed. Shelley R. Saunders. New Katzenberg, Anne M., and Shelley R. Saunders, eds.
York: Wiley-Liss. 2000. Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton.
Walker, Phillip L. 2008. Sexing skulls using discriminant New York: Wiley-Liss.
function analysis of visually assessed traits. American Klepinger, Linda L. 2006. Fundamentals of Forensic
Journal of Physical Anthropology 136(1):39–50. Anthropology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
Webb, Patricia A. O., and Judy M. Suchey. 1985. Komar, Debra A., and Jane E. Buikstra. 2008. Forensic
Epiphyseal union of the anterior iliac crest and medial Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Practice. New
clavicle in a modern multiracial sample of American York: Oxford.
males and females. American Journal of Physical Ortner, Donald J. 2003. Identification of Pathological
Anthropology 68:457–466. Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains. 2nd ed. San
Wilczak, Cynthia A., and Kenneth A. R. Kennedy. 1998. Diego: Academic Press.
Mostly MOS: Technical aspects of identification of Pickering, Robert B., and David C. Bachman. 1997. The
skeletal markers of occupational stress. Pp. 461–490 in Use of Forensic Anthropology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Press.
Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs. 2nd ed. Raxter, Michelle H., Benjamin M. Auerbach, and
Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Christopher B. Ruff. 2006. Revision of the Fully tech-
Willey, P., and Anthony Falsetti. 1991. Inaccuracy of nique for estimating statures. American Journal of
height information on driver’s licenses. Journal of Forensic Anthropology 130:374–384.
Forensic Sciences 36(3):813–819. Schwartz, Jeffrey H. 2007. Skeleton Keys: An Introduction
Yoder, Cassie, Douglas H. Ubelaker, and Joseph F. to Human Skeletal Morphology, Development, and
Powell. 2001. Examination of variation in the sternal Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Press.
rib end morphology relevant to age assessment. Spitz, Werner U., ed. 1993. Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal
Journal of Forensic Sciences 46:223–227. Investigation of Death. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C.
Thomas.
Steele, D. Gentry, and Claud A. Bramblett. 1988. Anatomy
and Biology of the Human Skeleton. College Station, TX:
Further Reading Texas A&M University Press.
Stimson, Paul G., and Curtis A. Mertz, eds. 1997. Forensic
Brogdon, B. G., ed. 1998. Forensic Radiology. Boca Raton, Dentistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
FL: CRC Press. Sulzmann, C. E., J. L. Buckberry, and R. F. Pastor. 2008.
Buikstra, Jane E., and Douglas H. Ubelaker. 1994. The utility of carpals for sex assessment: A prelimi-
Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal nary study. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Remains. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Archeological 135(3):252–262.
Survey Research Series No. 44. Warren, W. Michael, Heather A. Walsh-Haney, and
Burns, Karen R. 2006. Forensic Anthropology Training Laurel E. Freas, eds. 2008. The Forensic Anthropology
Manual. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Laboratory. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Dix, Jay, and Robert Calaluce. 1998. Guide to Forensic White, Tim D. 2000. Human Osteology. 2nd ed. San Diego,
Pathology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. CA: Academic Press.
The Marty Miller Case: Introducing Forensic Anthropology
Adams, Bradley J. 2003. Establishing personal identification based on specific patterns of missing, filled, and unrestored teeth.
Journal of Forensic Sciences 48:487–496.
Albanese, John , and Shelley R. Saunders . 2006. Is it possible to escape racial typology in forensic identification? Pp. 281–316
in Forensic Anthropology and Medicine: Complementary Sciences from Recovery to Cause of Death, ed. Aurore Schmitt ,
Eugénia Cunha and João Pinheiro . Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
Bass, William M. 1995. Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual. Columbia, MO: Missouri Archaeological Society.
Belcher, R. , F. Williams , and George J. Armelagos . 2002. Misidentification of meroitic Nubians using Fordisc 2.0. Paper
presented at the American Association of Physical Anthropology. Buffalo, NY.
Bennett, Kenneth A. 1993. A Field Guide for Human Skeletal Identification. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Brace, C. Loring . 1995. Region does not mean “Race”—Reality versus convention in forensic anthropology. Journal of Forensic
Sciences 40(2):171–175.
Buckberry, J. L. , and A. Chamberlain . 2002. Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: A revised method. American
Journal of Physical Anthropology 119:231–329.
Cardoso, Hugo F. V. 2008. Epiphyseal union at the innominate and lower limb in a modern Portuguese skeletal sample, and age
estimation in adolescent and young adult male and female skeletons. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
135(2):161–170.
Cunha, Eugénia . 2006. Pathology as a factor of personal identity in forensic anthropology. Pp. 333–358 in Forensic
Anthropology and Medicine: Complementary Sciences from Recovery to Cause of Death, ed. Aurore Schmitt , Eugénia Cunha
and João Pinheiro . Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
DiMaio, Vincent J. , and Dominick DiMaio . 2001. Forensic Pathology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Dittrick, Jean , and Judy M. Suchey . 1986. Sex determination of prehistoric central California skeletal remains using discriminant
analysis of the femur and humerus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 70:3–9.
Ericksen, M. F. 1991. Histological estimation of age at death using the anterior cortex of the femur. American Journal of Physical
Anthropology 84:171–179.
Fitzgerald, Charles M. , and Jerome C. Rose . 2000. Reading between the lines: Dental development and subadult age
assessment using the microstructural growth markers of teeth. Pp. 163–186 in Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton,
ed. M. Anne Katzenberg and Shelley R. Saunders . New York: Wiley-Liss.
France, Diane L. 1998. Observational and metric analysis of sex in the skeleton. Pp. 163–186 in Forensic Osteology: Advances in
the Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs . 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Galloway, Alison . 1988. Estimating actual height in the older individual. Journal of Forensic Sciences 33(1):126–136.
Galloway, Alison , ed. 1999. Broken Bones. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Gilbert, B. M. , and T. W. McKern . 1973. A method for aging the female os pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
38:31–38.
Giles, Eugene , and Orville Elliot . 1962. Race identification from cranial measurements. Journal of Forensic Sciences
7(2):147–157.
Giles, Eugene , and Orville Elliot . 1963. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. American Journal of
Physical Anthropology 21:53–68.
Giles, Eugene , and Linda L. Klepinger . 1988. Confidence intervals for estimates based on linear regression in forensic
anthropology. Journal of Forensic Sciences 33:1218–1222.
Gill, George W. 1998. Craniofacial criteria in the skeletal attribution of race. Pp. 293–317 in Forensic Osteology: Advances in the
Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs . 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Gill, George W. , and Stanley Rhine , eds. 1990. Skeletal Attribution of Race. Anthropology Papers No. 4, Maxwell Museum of
Anthropology.
Heuzé, Yann , and Hugo F. V. Cardoso . 2008. Testing the quality of nonadult Bayesian dental age assessment methods to
juvenile skeletal remains: The Lisbon collection children and secular trend effects. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
135(3):275–283.
Hoppa, Robert D. 2000. Population variation in osteological aging criteria: An example from the pubic symphysis. American
Journal of Physical Anthropology 111:185–191.
Iscan, Mehmet Yasar , and Susan Loth . 1986a. Determination of age from the sternal rib in white males: A test of the Phase
Method. Journal of Forensic Sciences 31:122–132.
Iscan, Mehmet Yasar , and Susan Loth . 1986b. Determination of age from the sternal rib in white females: A test of the Phase
Method. Journal of Forensic Sciences 31:990–999.
Jantz, Richard L. , David R. Hunt , and Lee Meadows . 1994. Maximum length of the tibia: How did Trotter measure it? American
Journal of Physical Anthropology 93:525–528.
Jantz, Richard L. , David R. Hunt , and Lee Meadows . 1995. The measure and mismeasure of the tibia: Implications for stature
estimation. Journal of Forensic Sciences 40:758–761.
Jupiter, J. B. , and M. R. Belsky . 1992. Fractures and dislocations of the hand. Pp. 925–1024 in Skeletal Trauma: Fractures,
Dislocations, Ligamentous Injuries, ed. B.D. Browner , J.B. Jupiter , A.M. Levine , and P.G. Trafton . Philadelphia: W.B.
Saunders.
Katz, Darryl , and Judy M. Suchey . 1986. Age determination of the male os pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
69:427–435.
Katz, Darryl , and Judy M. Suchey . 1989. Race differences in pubic symphyseal aging patterns in the male. American Journal of
Physical Anthropology 80:167–172.
Kennedy, Kenneth A. R. 1989. Skeletal markers of occupational stress. Pp. 129–160 in Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton,
ed. Mehmet Yasar Iscan and Kenneth A. R. Kennedy . New York: Alan R. Liss.
Kennedy, Kenneth A. R. , Thomas Plummer , and John Chiment . 1986. Identification of the eminent dead: Penpi, a scribe of
ancient Egypt. Pp. 290–307 in Forensic Osteology: The Recovery and Analysis of Unknown Skeletal Remains, ed. Kathleen J.
Reichs . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Kerley, Ellis R. , and Douglas H. Ubelaker . 1978. Revisions in the microscopic method of estimating age at death on human
cortical bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 49:545–546.
Klepinger, Linda L. 1999. Unusual skeletal anomalies and pathologies in forensic casework. Pp. 226–236 in Forensic
Osteological Analysis: A Book of Case Studies, ed. Scott I. Fairgrieve . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Konigsberg, Lyle W. , Samantha M. Hens , Lee Meadows Jantz , and William L. Jungers . 1998. Stature estimation and
calibration: Bayesian and maximum likelihood perspectives in physical anthropology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology Suppl
27(41):65–92.
Konigsberg, Lyle W. , Ann H. Ross , and William L. Jungers . 2006. Estimation and evidence in forensic anthropology:
Determining stature. Pp. 317–331 in Forensic Anthropology and Medicine: Complementary Sciences from Recovery to Cause of
Death, ed. Aurore Schmitt , Eugénia Cunha and João Pinheiro . Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
Konigsberg, Lyle W. , Bridget F. B. Algee-Hewitt , and Dawnie Wolfe Steadman . In Press. Estimation and evidence in forensic
anthropology: Sex and race. American Journal of Physical Anthropology.
Kostick, E. L. 1963. Facets and imprints on the upper and lower extremities of femora from a western Nigerian population.
Journal of Anatomy 97:393–402.
Krings, Matthias , Anne Stone , R.W. Schmitz , H. Krainitzki , Mark Stoneking , and Svante Pääbo . 1997. Neandertal DNA
sequences and the origin of modern humans. Cell 90:19–30.
Krogman, Wilton Marion , and Mehmet Yasar Iscan . 1986. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL:
Charles C. Thomas.
Lewontin, R. C. 1972. The apportionment of human diversity. Pp. 381–398 in Evolutionary Biology, ed. M.K. Hecht and W.S.
Steere . Vol. 6. New York: Plenum Press.
Lovejoy, C. Owen , Richard Meindl , Thomas R. Pryzbeck , and Robert P. Mensforth . 1985. Chronological metamorphosis of the
auricular surface of the ilium: A new method for the determination of age at death. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
68:15–28.
Lovell, Nancy C. 1989. Test of Phenice’s visual sexing technique for determining sex from the os pubis. American Journal of
Physical Anthropology 79:117–120.
Maples, William R. 1984. The identifying pathology. Pp. 363–366 in Human Identification: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology,
ed. Ted A. Rathbun and Jane E. Buikstra . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Maples, William R. 1986. Trauma analysis by the forensic anthropologist. Pp. 218–228 in Forensic Osteology: Advances in the
Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Marks, Jonathon . 1995. Human Biodiversity: Genes, Race and History. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
McKern, Thomas , and T. Dale Stewart . 1957. Skeletal Age Changes in Young American Males. Technical Report EP-45, Natick,
MA: U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Development Center, Environmental Protection Research Division.
McLachlan, Geoffrey J. 1992. Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Meindl, Richard , and C. Owen Lovejoy . 1985. Ectocranial suture closure: A revised method for the determination of skeletal age
at death based on the lateral-anterior sutures. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68:57–66.
Montagu, Ashley , ed. 1964. Man’s Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race. 4th ed. Cleveland, OH: World Press.
Moore-Jansen, Peer M. , Stephen D. Ousley , and Richard L. Jantz . 1994. Data Collection Procedures for Forensic Skeletal
Material. Reports of Investigations No. 48. Department of Anthropology. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee.
Moorrees, C. F. A. , E.A. Fanning , and E.E. Hunt . 1963a. Formation and resorption of three deciduous teeth in children.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 21:205–213.
Moorrees, C. F. A. , E.A. Fanning , and E.E. Hunt . 1963b. Age variation of formation stages for 10 permanent teeth. Journal of
Dental Research 42:1490–1502.
Mulhern, Dawn M. , and E.B. Jones . 2005. Test of the revised method of age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 126:61–65.
Murray, K. A. , and T. Murray . 1991. A test of the auricular surface aging technique. Journal of Forensic Sciences 36:1162–1169.
Nawrocki, Stephen . 1998. Regression formulae for estimating age at death from cranial suture closure. Pp. 276–292 in Forensic
Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs . 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C.
Thomas.
Ousley, Stephen D. 1995. Should we estimate “biological” or forensic stature? Journal of Forensic Sciences 40:768–773.
Ousley, Stephen D. , and Richard L. Jantz . 1996. Fordisc 2.0. Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Ousley, Stephen D. , and Richard L. Jantz . 1998. The Forensic Data Bank: Documenting skeletal trends in the United States. Pp.
441–457 in Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs . 2nd ed. Springfield,
IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Ousley, Stephen D. , and Richard L. Jantz . 2005. Fordisc 3.0: Personal Computer Forensic Discriminant Functions. Knoxville:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Phenice, T. W. 1969. A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
30:297–302.
Prince, Debra A. , and Douglas H. Ubelaker . 2002. Application of Lamendin’s adult dental aging technique to a diverse skeletal
sample. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47:107–116.
Robling, Alexander G. , and Sam D. Stout . 2000. Histomorphometry of human cortical bone: Applications to age estimation. Pp.
187–213 in Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton, ed. M. Anne Katzenberg and Shelley R. Saunders . New York: Wiley-
Liss.
Sauer, Norman J. 1984. Manner of death: Skeletal evidence of blunt and sharp instrument wounds. Pp. 176–184 in Human
Identification: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology, ed. Ted A. Rathbun and Jane E. Buikstra . Springfield, IL: Charles C.
Thomas.
Sauer, Norman J. 1992. Forensic anthropology and the concept of race: If races don’t exist, why are forensic anthropologists so
good at identifying them? Social Science and Medicine 34(2):107–111.
Sauer, Norman J. 1998. The timing of injuries and manner of death: Distinguishing among antemortem, perimortem, and
postmortem trauma. Pp. 321–332 in Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J.
Reichs . 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Saul, Julie Mather , and Frank P. Saul . 1999. Biker’s bones: An avocational syndrome. Pp. 237–250 in Forensic Osteological
Analysis: A Book of Case Studies, ed. Scott I. Fairgrieve . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Saunders, Shelley R. 2000. Subadult skeletons and growth-related studies. Pp. 135–161 in Biological Anthropology of the Human
Skeleton, ed. M. Anne Katzenberg and Shelley R. Saunders . New York: Wiley-Liss.
Saunders, Shelley R. , C. Fitzgerald , T. Rogers , C. Dudar , and H. McKillop . 1992. A test of several methods of skeletal age
estimation using a documented archaeological sample. Canadian Society of Forensic Sciences Journal 25(2):97–118.
Scheuer, Louise , and Sue Black . 2000. Developmental Juvenile Osteology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schour, I. , and M. Massler . 1941. The development of the human dentition. Journal of the American Dental Association
28:1153–1160.
Schour, I. , and M. Massler . 1944. Development of the Human Dentition. Chart, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American Dental
Association.
Singer, Ronald . 1953. Estimation of age from cranial suture closure: A report on its unreliability. Journal of Forensic Medicine
1:52–59.
Stewart, T. Dale . 1979. Essentials of Forensic Anthropology. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Stimson, Paul G. , and Curtis A. Mertz . 1997. Forensic Dentistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Stout, Sam D. 1992. Methods of determining age at death using bone microstructure. Pp. 21–35 in Skeletal Biology of Past
Peoples: Research Methods, ed. Shelley R. Saunders and M. Anne Katzenberg . New York: Wiley-Liss.
Suchey, Judy Myers , and Darryl Katz . 1998. Applications of pubic age determination in a forensic setting. Pp. 204–236 in
Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs . 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles
C. Thomas.
Sutherland, Leslie D. , and Judy M. Suchey . 1991. Use of the ventral arc in pubic sex determination. Journal of Forensic
Sciences 36(2):501–511.
Thieme, Frederick P. , and W.J. Schull . 1957. Sex discrimination from the skeleton. Human Biology 29(3):242–273.
Todd, T. Wingate . 1921a. Age changes in the pubic bone I: The white male pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
3:285–334.
Todd, T. Wingate . 1921b. Age changes in the pubic bone III: The pubis of the white female, IV: The pubis of the female White-
Negro hybrid. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 4:1–70.
Trotter, Mildred . 1970. Estimation of stature from intact long bones. Pp. 71–83 in Personal Identification in Mass Disasters, ed. T.
Dale Stewart . Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Trotter, Mildred , and Goldine C. Gleser . 1952. Estimation of stature from long bones of American Whites and Negroes.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 10:463–514.
Trotter, Mildred , and Goldine C. Gleser . 1958. A re-evaluation of estimation of stature based on measurements of stature taken
during life and of long bones after death. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 16:79–123.
Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1986. Estimation of age at death from histology of human bone. Pp. 240–247 in Dating and Age
Determination of Biological Materials, ed. M.R. Zimmerman and J. Lawrence Angel . London: Croom Helm.
Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1989. The estimation of age at death from immature human bone. Pp. 55–70 in Age Markers in the Human
Skeleton, ed. Mehmet Yasar Iscan . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1999. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Taraxacum.
Ubelaker, Douglas H. , and Carl H. Jacobs . 1995. Identification of orthopedic device manufacturer. Journal of Forensic Sciences
40(2):168–170.
Ubelaker, Douglas H. , and Crystal G. Volk . 2002. A test of the Phenice method for the estimation of sex. Journal of Forensic
Sciences 47(1):19–24.
VanVark, G. N. , and W. Schaafsma . 1992. Advances in the quantitative analysis of skeletal morphology. Pp. 225–257 in
Skeletal Biology of Past Peoples: Research Methods, ed. Shelley R. Saunders . New York: Wiley-Liss.
Walker, Phillip L. 2008. Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. American Journal of
Physical Anthropology 136(1):39–50.
Webb, Patricia A. O. , and Judy M. Suchey . 1985. Epiphyseal union of the anterior iliac crest and medial clavicle in a modern
multiracial sample of American males and females. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68:457–466.
Wilczak, Cynthia A. , and Kenneth A. R. Kennedy . 1998. Mostly MOS: Technical aspects of identification of skeletal markers of
occupational stress. Pp. 461–490 in Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J.
Reichs . 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Willey, P. , and Anthony Falsetti . 1991. Inaccuracy of height information on driver’s licenses. Journal of Forensic Sciences
36(3):813–819.
Yoder, Cassie , Douglas H. Ubelaker , and Joseph F. Powell . 2001. Examination of variation in the sternal rib end morphology
relevant to age assessment. Journal of Forensic Sciences 46:223–227.
Brogdon, B. G. , ed. 1998. Forensic Radiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Buikstra, Jane E. , and Douglas H. Ubelaker . 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Fayetteville,
AR: Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 44.
Burns, Karen R. 2006. Forensic Anthropology Training Manual. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dix, Jay , and Robert Calaluce . 1998. Guide to Forensic Pathology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Fisher, Russell S. 1993. History of forensic pathology and related laboratory sciences. Pp. 3–13 in Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal
Investigation of Death: Guidelines to the Application of Pathology to Crime Investigation, ed. Werner U. Spitz . Springfield, IL:
Charles C. Thomas.
Iscan, Mehmet Yasar , and Kenneth A. R. Kennedy , eds. 1989. Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton. New York: Wiley-Liss.
Jurmain, Robert . 1999. Stories From the Skeleton: Behavioral Reconstruction in Human Osteology. Amsterdam: Gordon and
Breach.
Katzenberg, Anne M. , and Shelley R. Saunders , eds. 2000. Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton. New York: Wiley-
Liss.
Klepinger, Linda L. 2006. Fundamentals of Forensic Anthropology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
Komar, Debra A. , and Jane E. Buikstra . 2008. Forensic Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford.
Ortner, Donald J. 2003. Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic
Press.
Pickering, Robert B. , and David C. Bachman . 1997. The Use of Forensic Anthropology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Raxter, Michelle H. , Benjamin M. Auerbach , and Christopher B. Ruff . 2006. Revision of the Fully technique for estimating
statures. American Journal of Forensic Anthropology 130:374–384.
Schwartz, Jeffrey H. 2007. Skeleton Keys: An Introduction to Human Skeletal Morphology, Development, and Analysis. 2nd ed.
New York: Oxford Press.
Spitz, Werner U. , ed. 1993. Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal Investigation of Death. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Steele, D. Gentry , and Claud A. Bramblett . 1988. Anatomy and Biology of the Human Skeleton. College Station, TX: Texas A&M
University Press.
Stimson, Paul G. , and Curtis A. Mertz , eds. 1997. Forensic Dentistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Sulzmann, C. E. , J.L. Buckberry , and R.F. Pastor . 2008. The utility of carpals for sex assessment: A preliminary study.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 135(3):252–262.
Warren, W. Michael , Heather A. Walsh-Haney , and Laurel E. Freas , eds. 2008. The Forensic Anthropology Laboratory. Boca
Raton, FL: CRC Press.
White, Tim D. 2000. Human Osteology. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
An Incidental Finding
Burke, P. A. , and C. Hughes-Lawson . 1989. Developmental changes in the facial soft tissue. American Journal of Physical
Anthropology 79(3):281–288.
Caldwell, Peggy C. 1981. The relationship of the details of the human face to the skull and its application in forensic
anthropology. MA Thesis, University of Arizona.
George, R. M. 1987. The lateral craniographic method of facial reconstruction. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32(5):1305–1330.
Hinkes, Madeleine J. 1990. Shovel-shaped incisors in human identification. Pp. 21–26 in Skeletal Attribution of Race in Forensic
Anthropology, ed. George W. Gill and Stanley Rhine . Anthropological Paper No. 4. Albuquerque, NM: Maxwell Museum of
Anthropology.
Science Contextualized
Darley-Usmar, Victor M. , ed. 1993. Mitochondria: DNA, Proteins, and Diseases, Monograph Series, No. 5, A. H. Schapira .
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mather, Paul D. 1994. M.I.A. Accounting for the Missing in Southeast Asia. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
Fisher, Russell S. 1980. Aircraft crash investigation. Pp. 406–419 in Medicolegal Investigation of Death, ed. Werner U. Spitz and
Russell S. Fisher . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
France, D. L. , T. J. Griffin , J. G. Swanburg , J. W. Lindemann , G. C. Davenport , and V. Trammel et al. 1992. A multi-
disciplinary approach to the detection of clandestine graves. Journal of Forensic Sciences (37):1445–1458.
Scott, Douglas D. , and Melissa A. Connor . 1997. Context delecti: Archaeological context in forensic work. Pp. 27–38 in Forensic
Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, ed. William D. Haglund and Marcella H. Sorg . Boca Raton, FL: CRC
Press.
Stoutamire, James . 1983. Excavation and recovery. Pp. 20–47 in Handbook of Forensic Archaeology and Anthropology, ed. Dan
Morse , Jack Duncan , and James Stoutamire . Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
Swegennis, Robert W. 1987. Impact angles and velocities. Pp. 1–16 in Safety Investigation: Investigative Techniques, ed. B.
Carver . Washington, DC: Department of the Air Force.
The Contributions of Archaeology and Physical Anthropology to the John McRae Case: a trial
and a retrial
Michigan Rules of Evidence (MRE) 404 (b).
People v. Golohowicz, 413 Mich 298 (1982).
People v. Modelski, 164 Mich App 337 (1987).
People v. VanderVliet, 444 Mich 52 (1993).
Moorrees, C. F. A. , E. Fanning , and E. E. Hunt, Jr. 1963. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. Journal of
Dental Research 42(6):1490–1502.
Sauer, N. J. 1998. The timing of injuries and manner of death: Distinguishing among antemortem, perimortem, and postmortem
trauma. Pp. 321–332 in Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, ed. Kathleen J. Reichs .
Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Sigler-Eisenberg, B. 1985. Forensic research: Expanding the concept of applied archaeology. American Antiquity 50:650–655.
Solari, A. C. , and K. Abramovitch . 2002. The accuracy and precision of third molar development as an indicator of chronological
age in Hispanics. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47(3):531–535.
Ubelaker, D. H. , and B. J. Adams . 1995. Differentiation of perimortem and postmortem trauma using taphonomic indicators.
Journal of Forensic Sciences 40(3):509–512.
Unusual “Crime” Scenes
Dengler, Dieter . 1979. Escape from Laos. Novato, California: Presidio Press.
Falise, Thierry . 1999. Laos-MIA: The Jungle Detectives. Nation World Times, November 9.
Owsley Douglas W. , Robert W. Mann , R. E. Chapman , E. Moore , and W. A. Cox . 1993. Positive identification in a case of
intentional extreme fragmentation. Journal of Forensic Sciences 38(4): 985–996.
Owsley, Douglas W. , Douglas Ubelaker , Max Houk , Kari Sanders , William Grant , E. Craig , T. Woltanski , and N. Peerwani .
1995. The role of forensic anthropology in the recovery and analysis of the Branch Davidian Compound victims: Techniques of
analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences 40(3): 341–348.
DeBruin, Jerry . 1995. Personality: Gene DeBruin, POW-Laos. Vietnam.
Hoshower, Lisa M. 1999. Dr. William R. Maples and the role of the consultants at the U.S. Army Central Identification Laboratory,
Hawaii. Journal of Forensic Sciences 44(4): 689–691.
Rochester, Stuart I. , and Frederick Kiley . 1998. Honor Bound. OSD Historical Office.
Ubelaker, Douglas H. , Douglas W. Owsley , Max M. Houck , E. Craig , W. Grant , T. Woltanski , R. Fram , Kari Sandness , and
N. Peerwani . 1995. The role of forensic anthropology in the recovery and analysis of Branch Davidian Compound victims:
Recovery procedures and characteristics of the victims. Journal of Forensic Sciences 40(3): 335–340.
Webster, Ann D. 1998. Excavation of a Vietnam-era aircraft crash site: Use of cross-cultural understanding and dual forensic
recovery methods. Journal of Forensic Sciences 43(2): 277–283.
Forensic Recoveries of U.S. War Dead and the Effects of Taphonomy and Other Site-Altering
Processes
Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1978. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Palaeobiology 4: 150–162.
Claringbould, M. J. 2000. Black Sunday: When the U.S. Fifth Air Force Lost to New Guinea Weather. Kingston, Australia,
Aerothentic Publications.
Efremov, J. A. 1940. Taphonomy: New branch of paleontology. Pan-American Geologist 74: 81–93.
Leney, M. D. 2006. Sampling skeletal remains for ancient DNA (aDNA): A measure of success. Historical Archaeology 40: 31–49.
Lewis, J. A. Jr. , C. Y. Shiroma , K. Von Guenthner , and K. N. Dunn . 2004. Recovery and identification of the victims of th.
Ehime Maru/USS Greenville collision at sea. Journal of Forensic sciences 49: 539–542.
Park, S. J. 2002. A preliminary anthropological analyses of the casualties from the Korean War during the year 2000–2001
excavation. Korean Journal of Physical Anthropology 15: 221–227.
Webster, A. D. 1998. Excavation of a Vietnam-era aircraft crash site: Use of cross-cultural understanding and dual forensic
recovery methods. Journal of Forensic sciences 43: 277–283.
Bonnichsen, R. and Marcella H. Sorg , eds. 1984. Bone Modification. Orono, ME: Center for Study of the First Americans.
Haglund, William D. and Marcella H. Sorg , eds. 1997. Forensic Taphonomy. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Haglund, William D. and Marcella H. Sorg , eds. 2002. Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, Theory, and Archaeological
Perspectives. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Holland, T. , B. E. Anderson , and R. W. Mann 1997. Human variables in the postmortem alteration of human bone: Examples
from U.S. war casualties. Pp. 265–274 in Forensic Taphonomy, ed. William D. Haglund and Marcella H. Sorg . Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press.
Micozzi, Mark S. 1991. Postmortem Change in Human and Animal Remains. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Shipman, Pat. 1981. Life History of a Fossil: An Introduction to Taphonomy and Paleoecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Warren, C. P. 1981. Forensic anthropology in a military setting. Human organization 40: 172–180.
Warren, C. P. 1984. Identification of military remains: Field and laboratory problems. Pp. 113–120, Human identification: case
studies in Forensic Anthropology, ed. Ted Rathbun and Jane E. Buikstra . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Corpi Aquaticus
Charney, Michael , and Charles G. Wilber . 1980. The Big Thompson flood. American Journal of Forensic Medical Pathology
1:139–144.
Gilliland, M. G. F. , Edward T. McDonough , R. M. Fossum , Graeme P. Dowling , Patrick E. Bessant-Matthews , and Charles S.
Petty . 1986. Disaster planning for air crashes: A retrospective analysis of Delta Airlines Flight 191. American Journal of Forensic
Medicine and Pathology 7:308–316.
Hinkes, Madeleine J. 1989. The role of forensic anthropology in mass disaster resolution. Aviation, Space, and Environmental
Medicine 60 (part 2):A60–A63.
Holland, Thomas D. , Bruce E. Anderson , and Robert W. Mann . 1997. Human variables in the postmortem alteration of human
bone: Examples from U.S. war casualties. Pp. 263–274 in Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, ed.
William D. Haglund and Marcella H. Sorg . Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Holland, Thomas D. , and Robert W. Mann . 1996. Forensic aviation archaeology: Finding and recovering American MIA remains.
Cultural Resource Management 19(10):29–31.
Kahana, Tzipi , Maya Fruend , and Jehuda Hiss . 1997. Suicidal terrorist bombings in Israel—identification of human remains.
Journal of Forensic Sciences 42:260–264.
Kontanis, Elias J. , and Paul S. Sledzik . 2008. Resolving commingling issues during the medicolegal investigation of mass fatality
incidents. Pp. 317–336 in Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Human Remains, ed. B. J. Adams and J. S. Byrd
. Totowa, NJ: Human Press.
London, Marilyn R. , Dawn M. Mulhern , Lenore T. Barbian , Paul S. Sledzik , Dennis C. Dirkmaat , Laura C. Fulginiti , Joseph T.
Hefner , and Norman J. Sauer . 2003. Roles of the biological anthropologist in the response to the crash of United Airlines Flight
93. Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences 9:279.
Mackinnon, Gaille , and Amy Z. Mundorff . 2007. The World Trade Center—September 11, 2001. Pp. 485–499 in An Introduction
to Biological Human Identification, ed. T. J. U. Thompson and S. M. Black . Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Mundorff, Amy Z. 2008. Anthropologist-direct triage: Three distinct mass fatality events involving fragmentation of human
remains. Pp. 123–144 in Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Human Remains, ed. B. J. Adams and J. S. Byrd.
Totowa , NJ: Human Press.
Mundorff, Amy Z. 2003. The role of anthropology during the identification of victims from the World Trade Center disaster.
Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences 9:277.
Owsley, Douglas W. , Douglas H. Ubelaker , Max M. Houck , Kari L. Sandness , William E. Grant , Emily A. Craig , T. J.
Woltanski , and N. Peerwani . 1995. The role of forensic anthropology in the recovery and analysis of Branch Davidian
Compound victims: Techniques of analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences 40:341–348.
Randall, Brad. 1991. Body retrieval and morgue operations at the crash of United Flight 232. Journal of Forensic Sciences
36:403–409.
Sledzik, Paul S. , and Patricia J. Kauffman . 2008. The mass fatality incident morgue: A laboratory for disaster victim
identification. Pp. 97–116 in The Forensic Anthropology Laboratory, ed. Michael Warren . Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Sledzik, Paul S. , and William C. Rodriguez . 2002. Damnum fatale: The taphonomic fate of human remains in mass disasters.
Pp. 321–330 in Advances in Forensic Taphonomy. Methods, Theories and Archaeological Perspectives, ed. William D. Haglund
and Marcela H. Sorg . Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Steadman, Dawnie W. , Kris Sperry , Frederick Snow , Laura Fulginiti , and Emily Craig . 2008. Anthropological Investigations of
the Tri-State Crematorium Incident. Pp. 81–96 in Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Human Remains, ed. B.
J. Adams and J. S. Byrd . Totowa, NJ: Human Press.
Stewart, T. Dale , ed. 1970. Personal Identification in Mass Disasters. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Thompson, Robert L. , William W. Manders , and William R. Cowan . 1987. Postmortem findings of the victims of the Jonestown
tragedy. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32:433–443.
Ubelaker, Douglas H. , Doug W. Owsley , Max M. Houck , Emily A. Craig , William E. Grant , T. Woltanski , R. Fram , Kari
Sandness , and N. Peerwani . 1995. The role of forensic anthropology in the recovery and analysis of Branch Davidian
Compound victims: Recovery procedures and characteristics of victims, Journal of Forensic Sciences 40:335–340.
Wagner, Glenn N. , and Richard C. Froede . 1993. Medicolegal investigation of mass disasters. Pp. 567–584 in Spitz and Fisher’s
Medicolegal Investigation of Death, ed. Werner U. Spitz . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Warren, Michael W. , K. R. Smith , Phoebe R. Stubblefield , S. S. Martin , and Heather A. Walsh-Haney . 2000. Use of
radiographic atlases in a mass fatality. Journal of Forensic Sciences 45:467–470.
Wiersema, Jason M. , Eric Bartelink , Z. Budimlija , M. Prinz , Robert Shaler , Amy Z. Mundorff , and Gaille MacKinnon . 2003.
The importance of an interdisciplinary review process in the World Trade Center mass disaster investigation. Proceedings of the
American Academy of Forensic Sciences 55:194.