D.V. Logunov, 2018, A New Ogre-Faced Spider Species of The Genus Deinopis From Vietnam
D.V. Logunov, 2018, A New Ogre-Faced Spider Species of The Genus Deinopis From Vietnam
Introduction
Figs. 1–7. Deinopis konplong sp.n. (the holotype): 1, 4 — male palp, ventral view; 2 — carapace, dorsal view; 3, 5 — male palp,
retrolateral view; 6 — carapace, dorso-anterior view; 7 — body, dorso-lateral view. Scale bars = (1–3, 6, 7) 1 mm, (4, 5) 0.5 mm.
Рис. 1–7. Deinopis konplong sp.n. (голотип): 1, 4 — пальпа самца, вид внизу; 2 — головогрудь, вид сверху; 3, 5 — пальпа
самца, вид сбоку-спереди; 6 — головогрудь, вид сверху-спереди; 7 — тело, вид сверху-сбоку. Масштаб = (1–3, 6, 7) 1 мм, (4, 5)
0,5 мм.
A new Deinopis species from Vietnam 141
Material and methods nam (see Map). Two Vietnamese Deinopis species were
found in different biogeographic provinces of Viet-
The holotype of the newly described species is nam. D. fasciculiger is known from the South Chinese
deposited in The Manchester Museum of the Universi- province, whereas the new species was collected from
ty of Manchester, UK (MMUE; curator: D.V. Logunov). the Central Annamese province, which is the moun-
Specimens were photographed at the Oxford Uni- tainous areas associated with Truong Son Ridge (see
versity Museum of Natural History with a Leica M165C Averyanov et al. [2003] for further details about these
stereo microscope (trinocular) with automated z-step- provinces]. Both regions are renowned for their rich
per, Camera Leica DFC495, Leica Application Suite biota and a remarkably high level of endemism [e.g.,
(software to run above), and Helicon Focus 5.3 x64 as Monastyrskii, 2007]. It is possible, however, that D.
a processing software. fasciculiger might represent the female of D. liukuen-
The terminology used for description of the male sis described and known from the single male from
palp follows Coddington et al. [2012]. Abbreviations Yunnan [Yin et al., 2002].
used in the text are as follows: Eyes: AME — anterior DISTRIBUTION. The type locality only (Map).
median eye, ALE — anterior lateral eye, PME — pos- DESCRIPTION. MALE (the holotype). Measure-
terior median eye, PLE — posterior lateral eye. Leg ments: Carapace: 5.20 long, 3.60 wide. Abdomen: 10.00
segments: Fm — femur, Pt — patella, Tb — tibia, long, 2.10 wide. Eyes and interdistances: AME 0.19,
Mt — metatarsus, Tr — tarsus. The sequence of leg ALE 0.23, PME 0.42, PLE 0.33, AME-AME 0.30,
segments in measurement data is as follows: femur + AME-ALE 0.88, PME-PME 0.35, PME-PLE 0.58.
patella + tibia + metatarsus + tarsus (total). All mea- Cheliceral length 1.70. Length of leg segments: I 17.60 +
surements are in mm. 2.40 + 19.50 + 23.80 + 6.20 (69.50); II 15.40 + 2.30 +
14.30 + 13.10 + 4.60 (49.70); III 10.50 + 1.90 + 8.60 +
Deinopis konplong sp.n. 7.00 + 1.20 (29.20); IV 10.30 + 1.80 + 8.80 + 8.80 +
Figs 1–7, Map. 1.40 (31.10). Leg formula I,II,IV,III. Coloration (in
alcohol; Figs 6–7). Carapace yellowish brown, with
TYPE. Holotype # (MMUE, G7579.37) from Vietnam, Kon white margins of thorax; head with a white triangle
Tum Province, Kon Plong Distr., c. 14 km N of Kon Plong (c. spot and a pair of longitudinal, short brown stripes
14°43′20″N, 108°18′59″E), 1030 m a.s.l., 3–12.06.2016, A.V. Abra- (Fig. 6). Sternum and labium white. Endites and cheli-
mov.
ETYMOLOGY. The specific epithet is a noun in cerae light yellowish brownish. Abdomen yellowish,
apposition taken from the type locality, Kon Plong in tinged with brown; dorsum with a longitudinal brown
central Vietnam. stripe (Fig. 7); venter yellow, but the area in front of
DIAGNOSIS. Of the Oriental Deinopis species the epigastric furrow is covered with black hairs. Book-
known from the males (or from both sexes) and reli- lungs light yellow. Spinnerets light yellowish brown-
ably illustrated, D. konplong sp.n. can be compared to ish. All legs and palps light yellowish brownish. Palpal
those of D. celebensis Merian, 1911 from Indonesia structure as in Figs 1, 3–5: cymbium swollen; tegulum
(Sulawesi) [cf. Merian, 1911: figs A, B], D. liukuensis flat, hidden behind the coils of embolus; embolus long
Yin, Griswold et Yan, 2002 from China (Yunnan) [cf. and strongly coiled, originating at 5 o’clock and mak-
Yin et al., 2002: figs 1–7] and D. scrubjunglei Caleb et ing five and a half revolutions around the single central
Mathai, 2014 from India (Tamil Nadu) [cf. Caleb & median apophysis which is situated in the central pit of
Mathai, 2014: figs 13, 14, 17, 18]. From all these the bulbus; median apophysis is bi-ramous, with one of
species, D. konplong sp.n. can be readily distinguished its blunt processes being directed mediad and another
by the longest and strongest embolus, of which coils apicad.
completely hide the tegulum lying behind them (Figs 1, FEMALE unknown.
4). From D. celebensis, the new species can also be
separated by the markedly (almost two times) shorter ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. I wish to thank Zoë
palpal femur and the carapace lacking lateral exten- Simmons (Oxford, UK) for allowing me to use the
sions, which are well-developed in D. celebensis; and digital facilities at the Oxford University Museum of
from D. scrubjunglei, the new species differs in having Natural History (UK). Alexei V. Abramov (St. Peters-
the larger, bi-ramous median apophysis. A detailed burg, Russia) is cordially thanked for making his Viet-
comparison with D. kollari Doleschall, 1859, described namese spider collections available for this study.
from the single male from Malaysia, is impossible be-
cause the copulatory organs of this species were not
illustrated [Doleschall, 1859: plate 8, fig. 7]; yet, the References
general appearance of D. kollari given in its original
description is very similar to that of D. konplong sp.n. Averyanov L.V., Phan Ke Loc Nguyen Tien Hiep & Harder D.K.
2003. Phytogeographic review of Vietnam and adjacent areas
(Fig. 7). of Eastern Indochina // Komarovia. Vol.3. P.1–83.
COMMENTS. It is highly unlikely that the newly Caleb J.T.D., Mathai M.T. 2014. A new species of Deinopis Mac-
described species can be the male of D. fasciculiger Leay (Araneae: Deinopidae) from India // Indian Journal of
described from the single female from northern Viet- Arachnology. Vol.3. No.1. P.1–7.
142 D.V. Logunov
Coddington J.A., Kuntner M., Opell B.D. 2012. Systematics of the Simon E. 1909. Étude sur les arachnides du Tonkin (1re partie) //
spider family Deinopidae with a revision of the genus Menneus // Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Belgique. Vol.42.
Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. No.636. P.1–61. P.69–147.
Doleschall L. 1859. Tweede Bijdrage tot de Kenntis der Arach- WSC 2018. World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern,
niden van den Indischen Archipel // Acta Societatis Scien- online at: http://wsc.nmbe.ch, version 19.0 (accessed on May
tiarum Indica-Neerlandica. Vol.5. P.1–60. 21st, 2018); doi: 10.24436/2.
Merian P. 1911. Die Spinnenfauna von Celebes. Beiträge zur Tier-
Yin C.M., Griswold C.E., Yan H.M. 2002. A new ogre-faced
geographie im Indoaustralischen Archipel // Zoologische Jahr-
spider (Deinopis) from the Gaoligong Mountains, Yunnan,
bücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie
der Tiere. Bd.31. S.165–354. China (Araneae, Deinopidae) // Journal of Arachnology. Vol.30.
Monastyrskii A.L. 2007. Ecological and biogeographical charac- P.610–612.
teristics of butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of Vietnam //
Entomological Review. Vol.87. No.1. P.43–65. Responsible editor K.G. Mikhailov