The document discusses food security and agro-ecology in the Philippines, highlighting issues such as government subsidies favoring large agribusinesses, the need for genuine agrarian reform, and the volatility of food prices due to climate change and import dependency. It proposes interventions like reducing import reliance, implementing the Genuine Agrarian Reform Bill, and promoting local production to enhance food security. The conclusion emphasizes prioritizing local farmers and sustainable agricultural policies to build a resilient food system.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views3 pages
STS Presentation Flow Group 6
The document discusses food security and agro-ecology in the Philippines, highlighting issues such as government subsidies favoring large agribusinesses, the need for genuine agrarian reform, and the volatility of food prices due to climate change and import dependency. It proposes interventions like reducing import reliance, implementing the Genuine Agrarian Reform Bill, and promoting local production to enhance food security. The conclusion emphasizes prioritizing local farmers and sustainable agricultural policies to build a resilient food system.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
Group Number: 6
Topic: Food Security and Agro-ecology
Names: Deluria, Lamzon, Tamayo Key Issues: A. Subsidies, Imports, and Exports B. Institutions and Governance in the Agricultural Sector C. Volatility of Food Prices Context: A. Issue: Government interventions, originally meant to support local farmers, often benefit large agribusinesses and reinforce dependency on imports. A1. Trade liberalization policies encourage excessive reliance on imports which harms local food production and farmer income. A2. Subsidies and grants provided by government institutions and NGOs fail to discriminate between farmers in need of assistance and those who do not. B. Issue: An over centralisation of agricultural systems have led to one-size-fits-all systems, stunting growth in the agricultural sector, as such systems, programs, and policies prioritize corporate interests over food sovereignty B1. Anti-farmer reforms, such as the National Land Use Act (NLUA) and the New Agrarian Emancipation Act (NAEA), facilitate land grabbing and agribusiness expansion rather than ensuring land access to smallholder farmers. NLUA allows landowners to reclassify agricultural lands as industrial, commercial, or residential, preventing farmers from securing their land rights. NAEA cancels farmer debts but does not provide mechanisms for land ownership, leaving them vulnerable to losing their lands to agribusiness corporations. B2. The absence of genuine agrarian reform leaves farmers landless, forcing them to work under exploitative conditions instead of fostering self-sufficient farming communities. The Build, Build, Build program, while boosting infrastructure, has led to the conversion of agricultural lands for roads, railways, and urban expansion, further marginalizing farmers. C. Issue: Climate change, reliance on imports, and market speculation create food price instability, disproportionately affecting small farmers and consumers. C1. The prolonged El Niño phenomenon affects the pricing and instability of rice dependent regions. C2. Dependency on imports for key agricultural products leaves prices unstable and reliant on government intervention. Interventions: A. Reduce import dependency by investing in local food production capacity and supporting sustainable farming practices and strengthen trade policies to protect domestic farmers while ensuring market competitiveness B. Ensure better implementation of the Genuine Agrarian Reform Bill (GARB), which has been filed in Congress but remains unapproved. Unlike CARP, GARB proposes free land distribution which would prevent agribusiness land grabbing and ensuring farmer ownership. C. Promote self-sufficiency by incentivizing local production and reducing reliance on food imports and implement price stabilization programs and price ceilings to protect both farmers and consumers Challenges: A1. Possible lack of cooperation from stakeholders, particularly farmers, due to past experiences with ineffective or exploitative initiatives A2. Reforms in subsidies and trade policies may face opposition from influential agribusiness sectors B1. Lack of proper budgeting/financing to execute the proposed plans. B2. Slow government processes may delay the implementation of necessary reforms C1. Disasters, specifically the lack of disaster response on local levels, significantly impact the availability of food. Moreover, efforts are directed more towards agriculture rather than the environment and natural resources – sectors which would improve defenses and coping with disasters C2. Water scarcity and degraded soil conditions may further limit productivity in key agricultural regions Conclusion/Synthesis: The struggle for food security in the Philippines is deeply intertwined with the fight for genuine agrarian reform. Decades of land dispossession, neoliberal trade policies, and weak institutional support have left Filipino farmers in a cycle of poverty and food insecurity. The dominance of corporate agribusinesses and foreign control over land resources has exacerbated the vulnerability of local food production, making the country reliant on unstable global markets for essential commodities. For example, the 2023 onion crisis saw prices surge to ₱700/kg due to supply chain mismanagement and import reliance, highlighting the need for stronger local production. Similarly, during El Niño years, rice shortages drive up prices, emphasizing the urgency of climate-adaptive farming. To ensure food security, we must prioritize local farmers, strengthen agricultural governance, and reduce import dependency. Passing the Genuine Agrarian Reform Bill (GARB) and rejecting anti-farmer policies like Cha-Cha are crucial steps toward this goal. Only through just and sustainable agricultural policies can we build a self-sufficient and resilient food system that serves the Filipino people. References: Adeva, P. K. (2023b, October 23). Marcos Jr.’s populist policies amid agricultural crisis. https://phkule.org/article/1015/marcos-jrs-populist-policies-amid-agricultural-crisis/ Ingalla, S. M. (2023, July 18). The National Land Use Act’s false promise of food security. https://phkule.org/article/893/the-national-land-use-acts-false-promise-of-food-security/ DA-AFID (March 2023) Awarding of Agricultural Assistance (March 8, 2023) https://www.da.gov. ph/gallery/awarding-of-agricultural-assistance-march-8-2023/ Department of Agriculture Department of Agriculture. (2025, February 6). DA authorizes onion imports to prevent potential price spikes. Official Portal of the Department of Agriculture. https://www.da.gov.ph/da- authorizes-onion-imports-to-prevent-potential-price-spikes/ Habito, C., Capistrano, D., Saguiguit Jr., G. (2016) Farms, Food, and Futures: Toward Inclusive and Sustainable Agricultural and Rural Development in Southeast Asia. S494.5.S86F47 Ateneo de Manila University, New Rizal Library Martinez, J., Governance in Agriculture and Rural Development. https://www.ombudsman .gov.ph/UNDP4/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Chap5.pdf Office of the Ombudsman Updated Philippine Development Plan (2017-2022) Expanding Economic Opportunities in Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries, and Ensuring Food Security. https://pdp.neda.gov.ph /wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Chapter-08.pdf Peasantmovtph. (2024, February 1). Charter Change will expose 14 million hectares of land to foreign ownership — farmers. Updates From the Peasant Movement of the Philippines. https://peasantmovementph.com/2024/01/15/charter-change-will-expose-14-million-hecta res-of-land-to-foreign-ownership-farmers/ Reyes, D. (2024, February 1). El Niño may affect 20 percent of ricefields – NIA | Inquirer News. INQUIRER.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1897341/nia-el-nino-may-affect-20-percent-of- rice-fields Timmer, C (2014) “The Dynamics of Agricultural Development and Food Security in Southeast Asia: Historical Continuity and Rapid Change: Handbook of Southeast Asian Economics Briones, R. and Israel D (2012) Impacts of Natural Disasters on Agriculture, Food Security, and Natural Resources and Environment in the Philippines. Philippine Institute of Development Studies Discussion Series no. 2012-36 https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS /pidsdps1236.pdf
2018 Near East and North Africa Regional Overview of Food Security and Nutrition: Rural Transformation - Key for Sustainable Development in the Near East and North Africa