Scribd
Upload
32 views8 pages

Relevancy of Judgments BSA2023

The document provides a detailed analysis of the relevancy of judgments under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, outlining various sections that address issues such as res judicata, judgments in special jurisdictions, public matters, and fraud. Each section is accompanied by relevant case law to illustrate its application. Key sections include those preventing re-litigation, judgments in special jurisdictions, and provisions for addressing fraud or incompetency.

Uploaded by

Javeed M
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
32 views8 pages

Relevancy of Judgments BSA2023

The document provides a detailed analysis of the relevancy of judgments under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, outlining various sections that address issues such as res judicata, judgments in special jurisdictions, public matters, and fraud. Each section is accompanied by relevant case law to illustrate its application. Key sections include those preventing re-litigation, judgments in special jurisdictions, and provisions for addressing fraud or incompetency.

Uploaded by

Javeed M
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Relevancy of Judgments under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Detailed Analysis of Relevancy of Judgments under BSA, 2023

Section 34: Judgments Preventing Re-litigation

This section deals with res judicata and double jeopardy. A case already judged by a competent court cannot

be tried again. Relevant Case: *Satyadhyan Ghosal v. Deorajin Debi* (AIR 1960 SC 941).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 35: Judgments in Special Jurisdictions

Covers judgments in probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency cases. They are conclusive proof of legal

character conferred or taken away. Relevant Case: *K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa* (2013) 5 SCC 226.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 36: Judgments on Public Matters

Judgments are relevant if they relate to public rights or matters. However, they are not conclusive proof.

Relevant Case: *Bhura v. State of Rajasthan* AIR 1964 Raj 1.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 37: Other Judgments

Only relevant if the existence of such a judgment is itself in issue. Relevant Case: *State of Bihar v. Radha

Page 1
Relevancy of Judgments under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Krishna Singh* (AIR 1983 SC 684).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 38: Fraud or Incompetency

Allows proof of fraud, collusion or incompetency of the court rendering the judgment. Relevant Case: *A.V.

Papayya Sastry v. Govt. of A.P.* (2007) 4 SCC 221.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 34: Judgments Preventing Re-litigation

This section deals with res judicata and double jeopardy. A case already judged by a competent court cannot

be tried again. Relevant Case: *Satyadhyan Ghosal v. Deorajin Debi* (AIR 1960 SC 941).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 35: Judgments in Special Jurisdictions

Covers judgments in probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency cases. They are conclusive proof of legal

character conferred or taken away. Relevant Case: *K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa* (2013) 5 SCC 226.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 2
Relevancy of Judgments under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 36: Judgments on Public Matters

Judgments are relevant if they relate to public rights or matters. However, they are not conclusive proof.

Relevant Case: *Bhura v. State of Rajasthan* AIR 1964 Raj 1.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 37: Other Judgments

Only relevant if the existence of such a judgment is itself in issue. Relevant Case: *State of Bihar v. Radha

Krishna Singh* (AIR 1983 SC 684).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 38: Fraud or Incompetency

Allows proof of fraud, collusion or incompetency of the court rendering the judgment. Relevant Case: *A.V.

Papayya Sastry v. Govt. of A.P.* (2007) 4 SCC 221.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 34: Judgments Preventing Re-litigation

Page 3
Relevancy of Judgments under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

This section deals with res judicata and double jeopardy. A case already judged by a competent court cannot

be tried again. Relevant Case: *Satyadhyan Ghosal v. Deorajin Debi* (AIR 1960 SC 941).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 35: Judgments in Special Jurisdictions

Covers judgments in probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency cases. They are conclusive proof of legal

character conferred or taken away. Relevant Case: *K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa* (2013) 5 SCC 226.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 36: Judgments on Public Matters

Judgments are relevant if they relate to public rights or matters. However, they are not conclusive proof.

Relevant Case: *Bhura v. State of Rajasthan* AIR 1964 Raj 1.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 37: Other Judgments

Only relevant if the existence of such a judgment is itself in issue. Relevant Case: *State of Bihar v. Radha

Krishna Singh* (AIR 1983 SC 684).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 4
Relevancy of Judgments under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 38: Fraud or Incompetency

Allows proof of fraud, collusion or incompetency of the court rendering the judgment. Relevant Case: *A.V.

Papayya Sastry v. Govt. of A.P.* (2007) 4 SCC 221.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 34: Judgments Preventing Re-litigation

This section deals with res judicata and double jeopardy. A case already judged by a competent court cannot

be tried again. Relevant Case: *Satyadhyan Ghosal v. Deorajin Debi* (AIR 1960 SC 941).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 35: Judgments in Special Jurisdictions

Covers judgments in probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency cases. They are conclusive proof of legal

character conferred or taken away. Relevant Case: *K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa* (2013) 5 SCC 226.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 36: Judgments on Public Matters

Page 5
Relevancy of Judgments under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Judgments are relevant if they relate to public rights or matters. However, they are not conclusive proof.

Relevant Case: *Bhura v. State of Rajasthan* AIR 1964 Raj 1.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 37: Other Judgments

Only relevant if the existence of such a judgment is itself in issue. Relevant Case: *State of Bihar v. Radha

Krishna Singh* (AIR 1983 SC 684).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 38: Fraud or Incompetency

Allows proof of fraud, collusion or incompetency of the court rendering the judgment. Relevant Case: *A.V.

Papayya Sastry v. Govt. of A.P.* (2007) 4 SCC 221.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 34: Judgments Preventing Re-litigation

This section deals with res judicata and double jeopardy. A case already judged by a competent court cannot

be tried again. Relevant Case: *Satyadhyan Ghosal v. Deorajin Debi* (AIR 1960 SC 941).

Page 6
Relevancy of Judgments under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 35: Judgments in Special Jurisdictions

Covers judgments in probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency cases. They are conclusive proof of legal

character conferred or taken away. Relevant Case: *K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa* (2013) 5 SCC 226.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 36: Judgments on Public Matters

Judgments are relevant if they relate to public rights or matters. However, they are not conclusive proof.

Relevant Case: *Bhura v. State of Rajasthan* AIR 1964 Raj 1.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 37: Other Judgments

Only relevant if the existence of such a judgment is itself in issue. Relevant Case: *State of Bihar v. Radha

Krishna Singh* (AIR 1983 SC 684).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 38: Fraud or Incompetency

Page 7
Relevancy of Judgments under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Allows proof of fraud, collusion or incompetency of the court rendering the judgment. Relevant Case: *A.V.

Papayya Sastry v. Govt. of A.P.* (2007) 4 SCC 221.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 8

You might also like