Ijmicro2020 8817467
Ijmicro2020 8817467
Research Article
Molecular Identification and Antimicrobial Potential of
Streptomyces Species from Nepalese Soil
Karan Khadayat,1,2 Dawa Dindu Sherpa,2 Krishna Prakash Malla,2 Sunil Shrestha,2
Nabin Rana,2 Bishnu P. Marasini,2 Santosh Khanal,3 Binod Rayamajhee,3
Bibek Raj Bhattarai,1 and Niranjan Parajuli 1
1
Central Department of Chemistry, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal
2
Department of Biotechnology, National College, Tribhuvan University, Naya Bazar, Kathmandu, Nepal
3
Department of Microbiology, National College, Tribhuvan University, Naya Bazar, Kathmandu, Nepal
Copyright © 2020 Karan Khadayat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
Streptomyces are widely used for the production of secondary metabolites with diverse biological activities, including antibiotics.
The necessity of alternative antimicrobial agents against multidrug-resistant pathogens is indispensable. However, the production
of new therapeutics is delayed in recent days. Thus, the isolation of new Streptomyces species has drawn attention. Nepal—a
country rich in biodiversity—has got high possibilities for the discovery of members of actinomycetes, especially in the higher
altitudes. However, in vain, only a few screening research works have been reported from Nepal to date. Streptomyces species were
isolated on ISP4 media, and characterization was performed according to morphological similarity and 16S rRNA sequence
similarity using bioinformatic tools. Ethyl acetate extracts of Streptomyces species were prepared, and the antimicrobial activity
was carried out using agar well diffusion technique. In this report, 18 Streptomyces species isolated from the soil were reported
based on sequence analysis of 16S rRNA. Among them, 12 isolates have shown antibacterial activity against extended-spectrum
beta-lactamase- (ESBL-) producing Escherichia coli. Here, we have also analyzed 16S rRNA in 27 Streptomyces species whose
whole-genome sequence is available, which has revealed that some species have multiple copies of the 16S gene (∼1.5 kb) with
significant variation in nucleotides. In contrast, some Streptomyces species shared identical DNA sequences in multiple copies of
16S rRNA. The sequencing of numerous copies of 16S rRNA is not necessary, and the molecular sequencing of this region is not
sufficient for the identification of bacterial species. The Streptomyces species-derived ethyl acetate extracts from Nepalese soil
demonstrate potential activity against ESBL-producing E. coli. Thus, they are potential candidates for antibiotics manufacturing in
the future.
clinically available antibiotics used in the treatment of sulfate, 18 gm Bacto agar, 1 gm sodium chloride, 2 gm
multiple infections in humans [9–12]. Many studies report ammonium sulfate, and 1000 mL distilled water at pH
that Streptomyces have tremendous potential to yield sec- 7.0 ± 0.1). The inoculum was then appropriately spread using
ondary metabolites, including anticancer drugs, antibiotics, a sterile glass spreader until the plates were dry and incu-
growth factors, and herbicides [13]. The higher percentage of bated at 28°C for 7–12 days [20].
GC content (∼70%) is present in Streptomyces spp. The 16S
rDNA analyses and DNA-DNA hybridization are significant
distinguishing properties that separate Streptomyces from 2.3. Characterization of Streptomyces. The characterization
other actinobacteria. Streptomyces from extreme or un- of Streptomyces was performed based on their Gram
touched habitats such as high altitude [14, 15] and desert staining, growth pattern, colony morphology, and the for-
[16, 17] are isolated and cultured to discover novel antibi- mation of soluble pigments, as suggested by Bergey’s Manual
otics. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) pro- of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Vol. 5, The
duced primarily by the bacteria Escherichia coli and Actinobacteria, Part A [21]. All of the isolates were grown on
Klebsiella pneumoniae confer resistance to most beta-lactam ISP4 media, and the morphology of each isolate was visually
antibiotics, including penicillins and cephalosporins. In- observed (such as colony characteristics, an earthy odor,
fections caused by these bacteria are being difficult to treat spore formation, and aerial and substrate mycelia of colo-
globally, and the mortality rate has sharply increased along nies). Sugar utilization tests and physiological tests such as
with prolonged hospital stay and greater economic burden motility, salt tolerance, and temperature tolerance were also
[18]. performed.
Due to the unique geographical niche of Nepal, soil
microbes, such as Streptomyces, have a high probability of 2.4. Genomic DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Amplification of
producing novel secondary metabolites of diverse clinical Isolated Streptomyces Strains. Phenotypically identified iso-
value, which is much anticipated in the health care sector. In lates of Streptomyces were cultured on trypticase soy broth
this report, soil samples from 14 different environments of (TSB) using glass beads in 100 ml conical flasks for 3 days at
Nepal with varying from 86 m to 4,026 m above the sea level 28°C. After incubation, the supernatant part was discarded,
in altitude were collected for the isolation of Streptomyces and mycelia were harvested from the broth by centrifugation
species with antibacterial properties. This study is mainly at 4,000 rpm for 15 min. Genomic DNA was isolated by the
aimed at the screening of Streptomyces species that can standard phenol–chloroform method from the harvested
produce metabolites for the inhibition of ESBL-producing mycelia [22]. The universal primers 27 F:5′-AGAGTTT-
clinical isolate of E. coli, and their molecular identification GATCMTGGCTCAG-3′ and 1492 R:5′-ACGGY-
using 16S rRNA sequencing. Besides, 16S rRNA found in TACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′ were used for amplification of
other Streptomyces species reported in GenBank is also 16S rRNA from genomic DNA. The amplification was carried
reviewed for further scientific discourse. out in a 50 μL of total volume by using 125 ng of genomic
DNA as a template with 2X premix (Taq polymerase) and
2. Methods 10 μM of each primer. PCR conditions were maintained as
follows: initial 5 min for denaturation at 95°C, followed by 35
2.1. Collection and Pretreatment of Soil Sample. The soil cycles of 30s at 95°C, 30s at 51.4°C, and 120s at 72°C, and a
samples were collected from 14 different habitats of Nepal final extension of 10 min at 72°C (TAKARA Thermal Cycler,
(altitude from 86 m to 4,026 m above the sea level) such as Japan). The amplified products were examined by 0.8%
gardens, cultivated fields, barren land, open fields, organic agarose gel electrophoresis [23] stained by ethidium bromide.
manure pits, and soil from conserved forests, as shown in The purified PCR products were sequenced using the same
Supplementary Materials (Table S1). The samples were primers, 27 F and 1492R (Macrogen, Inc., South Korea).
collected digging around 5–10 cm depth from the surface of
the earth. Soil samples were then packed in sterile polythene
bags, labeled, and brought to the laboratory. They were air- 2.5. Sequence Analysis. The homology search of partial DNA
dried for 3-4 hrs at 45°C, crushed, and sieved before use for sequences of 16S rRNA was performed by comparing them
the isolation of Streptomyces species [19]. with the public database (NCBI) using the standard basic
local alignment search tool (BLAST) program. Multiple
alignments were conducted using Clustal [24], and the
2.2. Isolation of Streptomyces. One gram of soil was dissolved phylogenetic tree was made using MEGA version 6.0 by the
in 10 mL of sterile distilled water in the test tube and vor- neighbor-joining method with bootstrap values calculated
texed vigorously for 5 minutes. Then, the suspension was from 1,000 replications (Supplementary Materials,
heated at 80°C for 30 minutes and serially diluted up to 10−4 Figure S1) [25]. On the other hand, the multiple copies of
in the laminar hood; then 100 µL of each dilution was placed 16S rRNA present in the assembled genome sequencing of
on the International Streptomyces Project 4 (ISP4) agar the other 27 Streptomyces species given in the website (JGI
medium supplemented with nalidixic acid (20 mg/mL) and IMG Integrated Microbial Genomes and Microbiomes,
cycloheximide (50 mg/mL) (ISP4: 10 gm starch, 1 gm 2019) was evaluated through multiple DNA-DNA sequence
dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4), 1 gm calcium carbonate, alignments using Clustal W (Supplementary Materials,
1 mg ferrous sulfate, 1 mg manganese chloride, 1 mg zinc Table S3).
International Journal of Microbiology 3
2.6. Extraction of Bioactive Compounds. The isolated 3.2. Antibacterial Assays. The antibacterial activity of ethyl
Streptomyces species were first cultured in the TSB and acetate extract (50 mg/mL) of isolates was evaluated against
incubated at 30°C for three days for the preparation of in- ESBL-producing clinical isolates of E. coli using well dif-
oculum. After full growth, 1% Streptomyces mycelium was fusion method. The results showed that crude extract
transferred aseptically into the fresh TSB and again incu- exhibited a zone of inhibition ranging from 10 to 13 mm
bated at 30°C for seven days. An equal volume of organic (size of wells: 6 mm) against ESBL-producing E. coli as
solvent, ethyl acetate, was used for extracting the bioactive compared to positive control neomycin with 19 mm zone of
compounds to an equal volume of culture. The mixture of inhibition, as shown in Figure 3 and Supplementary Ma-
culture with an organic solvent was shown in two layers terials, Table S2. Some pure isolates also showed antimi-
(organic layer contained secondary metabolites) and incu- crobial activity against S. aureus (ATCC 25923), E. coli
bated overnight in a rotary shaker. The mixture was then (ATCC 25922), K. pneumoniae (ATCC 700603), and Sal-
centrifuged, and the supernatant was taken. The concen- monella typhimurium (ATCC 14028) (data not included in
trated supernatant was further used for antimicrobial this report).
activity.
Figure 1: Colony morphology indicating aerial (a) and substrate (b) mycelia of isolated Streptomyces species.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 3: Antibacterial activity against ESBL-producing E. coli shown by crude extract of Streptomyces species.
Table 1: 16S rRNA sequence analysis of Streptomyces species and potent secondary metabolites.
Match in the databases
Sample no. Accession number
Species Identity (%) Identifier
Streptomyces spp. ZG731 96 GQ985455.1
SA1 LC427859
Streptomyces coelicoflavus strain HQA809 93 KT758401.2
Streptomyces spp. BCG69 80 KF956734.1
SA2 LC425654
Streptomyces spp. 219839 80 HQ992728.1
Streptomyces spp. strain D3 97 KX762051.1
SA3 LC427860
Streptomyces lividans strain jx-02 97 KC898819.1
Streptomyces spp. strain D3 98 KX762051.1
SA4 LC427861
Streptomyces lividans strain YLA0 98 KT362142.1
Streptomyces spp. CMU-AC2 96 LC073311.1
SA5 LC427862
Streptomyces spp. CMU-AB225 96 LC073310.1
Streptomyces spp. JSM 147611 96 KR817740.1
SA6 LC427863
Streptomyces violascens strain G8A-22 96 HQ238389.1
Streptomyces spp. DHS C014 97 KP986577.1
SA7 LC427864
Streptomyces tumenensis 97 AM180560.1
Uncultured Streptomyces spp. clone T1S-05 82 GQ369231.1
SA8 LC427865
Streptomyces ryensis strain zw24 83 MH337934.1
Streptomyces spp. 34005 98 GU263848.1
KM1 MT463712
Streptomyces strain P14S1 98 KX673842.1
Streptomyces globisporus subsp. globisporus isolate XSD-114 85.1 EU273549.1
KM2 MT463715
Streptomyces cavourensis strain TSM 11 85 MK789724.1
Streptomyces pratensis strain EA5 93.2 KU973961.1
KM3 MT463732
Streptomyces spp. QLS12 93.5 KU973961.1
Streptomyces coelicoflavus strain 3-2 98.3 KJ571034.1
KM5 MT464457
Streptomyces coelicoflavus strain HQA020 98.1 KT758352.1
Streptomyces spp. 193322 96.2 KU982617.1
KM6 MT464460
Streptomyces parvus strain T23 96.2 KU317906.1
Streptomyces canus strain IMCC 34906 97.4 MK138629.1
KM8 MT464462
Streptomyces spp. strain ST228 97.4 KX906839.1
Streptomyces globisporus strain AHS10 99 KU981096.1
DA1 MT441544
Streptomyces violascens strain EA27 98.2 KU973982.1
Streptomyces naganishii NRRLB-1816 98.4 NR_043831.1
DA2 MT459245
Streptomyces spp. FXJ1.447 98.4 KP126357.1
Streptomyces pratensis 190525 97.1 KU973967.1
DA3 MT459275
Streptomyces spp. strain WA22-1-2 97 KY206810.1
Streptomyces spp. strain HN25 98.7 MF397913.1
DA4 MT463685
Streptomyces diastaticus subsp. ardesiacus strain AR-39 98.7 KX055839.1
taxonomic spectrum and taxonomic discrimination, re- copies of 16S rRNA analysis [44]. Ten Streptomyces strains
spectively. However, there is some discrepancy regarding the isolated from three different lichens were found to have
molecular identification of bacterial species based on 16S similar 16S rRNA gene sequences [45, 46]. The analysis of
rRNA. Guo et al. have claimed that sequencing of 16S rRNA multiple copies of 16S rRNA in different Nocardia strains
is not useful for closely related strains and only limited to the suggests that only BLAST analysis could not confirm the
distinction of slightly related Streptomycetes [38]. species present in the isolates [47]. Two copies of 16S rRNA
Some studies have reported that multiple copies of 16S genes contained in actinomycete, Thermobispora bispora,
rRNA are limited and have less probability of affecting the differ in nucleotides sequence at 98 positions (6.4% of
phylogenetic analysis of the species because, in most cases, the complete nucleotides sequence) having six regions of in-
sequence of these multiple copies is entirely or nearly identical sertion and deletions [48]. A study suggested transitional
[39–41]. However, others have shown that with an increase in and transversional substitutions as two distinct mechanisms
the number of multiple copies of 16S rRNA, the variation in for the occurrence of multiple copies of 16S rRNA in 33
sequence also increases [42], and the 16S rRNA sequence is Streptomyces strains (6.9%) out of 475 isolates [49]. Thus, the
not enough criteria to assure species identity [43]. sequencing of multiple copies of 16S rRNA seems to be not
In silico analysis of 16S rRNA of 174 actinobacteria useful for the identification of species.
showed the phylum contains 3.402 ± 1.720 average copies of
16S rRNA, of which 1.569 ± 0.869 copies are not 100% 5. Conclusion
similar to other copies. The results infer that the average
maximum variation is 1.121 ± 2.400, along with an average The present study demonstrates that Streptomyces species
minimum similarity of 99.927 ± 0.158 based on multiple isolated from different altitudes of Nepal showed potential
International Journal of Microbiology 7
antibacterial activity against ESBL-producing E. coli. This [2] J. Hug, C. Bader, K. Cirnski, and R. Müller, “Concepts and
report demands further study on Streptomyces spp. of Nepal methods to access novel antibiotics from actinomycetes,”
to uncover novel secondary metabolites, which could be an Antibiotics, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 44, 2018.
ideal option for the treatment of infections caused by drug- [3] K. Poole, “Mechanisms of bacterial biocide and antibiotic
resistant pathogens. We also suggest that the molecular se- resistance,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 92, no. s1,
pp. 55S–64S, 2002.
quencing of multiple copies of the 16S rRNA is not necessary
[4] D. J. Payne, M. N. Gwynn, D. J. Holmes, and D. L. Pompliano,
for species identification of Streptomycetes, rather fatty acid “Drugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibac-
methyl ester (FAME) analysis, profiling of metabolites, and terial discovery,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 6, no. 1,
DNA-DNA hybridization are required for this purpose. pp. 29–40, 2007.
[5] C. Olano, C. Méndez, and J. Salas, “Antitumor compounds
Data Availability from marine actinomycetes,” Marine Drugs, vol. 7, no. 2,
pp. 210–248, 2009.
DNA accession numbers are available on GenBank. [6] J. Bérdy, “Bioactive microbial metabolites,” The Journal of
Antibiotics, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2005.
[7] K. F. Chater, ““Morphological and physiological differentia-
Conflicts of Interest tion in Streptomyces,” cold spring,” Harbor Monograph Ar-
chive, vol. 16, pp. 89–115, 1984.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest
[8] D. A. Hopwood, “Highlights of Streptomyces genetics,” He-
regarding the publication of this paper. redity, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2019.
[9] M. Watve, R. Tickoo, M. Jog, and B. Bhole, “How many
Authors’ Contributions antibiotics are produced by the genus Streptomyces?” Ar-
chives of Microbiology, vol. 176, no. 5, pp. 386–390, 2001.
Dawa Dindu Sherpa, Krishna Prakash Malla, and Sunil [10] S. A. Waksman, A. Schatz, and D. M. Reynolds, “Production
Shrestha contributed equally to this work. NP designed the of antibiotic substances by actinomycetes,” Annals of the New
research; DDS, KPM, SS, and KK carried out experiments; York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1213, no. 1, pp. 112–124, 2010.
NP, BPM, SK, BR, NR, and BRB analyzed the data; and NP [11] J. Bérdy, “Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: where we are
wrote the manuscript. now and where we are heading,” The Journal of Antibiotics,
vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 385–395, 2012.
[12] P. Sivalingam, K. Hong, J. Pote, and K. Prabakar, “Extreme
Acknowledgments environment Streptomyces: potential sources for new anti-
bacterial and anticancer drug leads?” International Journal of
The authors would like to thank Mr. Raju Shreastha for Microbiology, vol. 2019, pp. 1–20, 2019.
providing ESBL-producing E. coli samples. The authors are [13] M. Harir, H. Bendif, M. Bellahcene, Z. Fortas, and R. Pogni,
also thankful to the University Grants Commission, Nepal. “Streptomyces secondary metabolites,” Basic Biology and
This study was financially supported under the Collaborative Applications of Actinobacteria, vol. 6, pp. 99–122, 2018.
Research Grants (Award no. CRG-75/76-S&T-1) by the [14] T. D. Gurung, C. Sherpa, V. P. Agrawal, and B. Lekhak,
University Grants Commission, Nepal, to Niranjan Parajuli. “Isolation and characterization of antibacterial actinomycetes
from soil samples of kalapatthar, mount everest region,” Nepal
Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 10, pp. 173–182, 1970.
Supplementary Materials [15] P. S. Kumar, J. P. P. Raj, V. Duraipandiyan, and
S. Ignacimuthu, “Antibacterial activity of some actinomycetes
Supplementary Figure S1. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic from Tamil Nadu, India,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical
tree of 16S rRNA from 18 isolates. Horizontal branch lengths Biomedicine, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 936–943, 2012.
proportional to the estimated number of nucleotide substi- [16] C. K. Okoro, R. Brown, A. L. Jones et al., “Diversity of cul-
tutions, and bootstrap probabilities (as percentages), as de- turable actinomycetes in hyper-arid soils of the Atacama
termined for 1000 resamplings, are given above or beside the Desert, Chile,” Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 95, no. 2,
internal branches. The bar in the lower-left corner indicates pp. 121–133, 2009.
0.2 amino acid substitutions per amino acid for the branch [17] M. E. Rateb, W. E. Houssen, W. T. A. Harrison et al., “Diverse
length. Supplementary Table S1. Cultural features of Strep- metabolic profiles of a Streptomyces strain isolated from a
tomyces species isolated from different parts of Nepal. Sup- hyper-arid environment,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 74,
plementary Table S2. Antimicrobial activity of some p. 1965, 2011.
Streptomyces species against ESBL-producing E. coli. Sup- [18] P.-L. Lu, Y.-C. Liu, H.-S. Toh et al., “Epidemiology and an-
timicrobial susceptibility profiles of Gram-negative bacteria
plementary Table S3. Multiple copy numbers of 16S rRNA
causing urinary tract infections in the Asia-Pacific region:
present in the assembled genome sequencing of Streptomyces 2009-2010 results from the Study for Monitoring Antimi-
given in the website (JGI IMG Integrated Microbial Genomes crobial Resistance Trends (SMART),” International Journal of
and Microbiomes, 2019). (Supplementary Materials) Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 40, pp. S37–S43, 2012.
[19] I. Saadoun, K. M. Hameed, and A. Moussauui, “Character-
References ization and analysis of antibiotic activity of some aquatic
actinomycetes,” Microbios, vol. 99, no. 394, pp. 173–179, 1999.
[1] O. Genilloud, “Actinomycetes: still a source of novel anti- [20] M. K. Kharel, M. D. Shepherd, S. E. Nybo et al., “Isolation of
biotics,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 34, no. 10, Streptomyces species from soil,” Current Protocols in Mi-
pp. 1203–1232, 2017. crobiology, vol. 19, 2010.
8 International Journal of Microbiology
[21] W. Whitman, M. Goodfellow, P. Kämpfer et al., Bergey’s [36] B. Pandey, P. Ghimire, and V. P. Agrawal, “Studies on the
Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: Volume 5: The antibacterial activity of the actinomycetes isolated from the
Actinobacteria, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 2nd khumbu region of Nepal,” International Journal of Microbi-
edition, 2012. ology and Biotechnology, vol. 23, pp. 44–53, 2004.
[22] J. Sambrook and D. W. Russell, “Molecular cloning: a labo- [37] J. Patel, “16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial pathogen
ratory manual,” Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, vol. 1, identification in the clinical laboratory,” Molecular Diagnosis,
p. 112, 2001. vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 313–321, 2001.
[23] P. Jose and S. R. Jebakumar, “Phylogenetic diversity of ac- [38] Y. Guo, W. Zheng, X. Rong, and Y. Huang, “A multilocus
tinomycetes cultured from coastal multipond solar saltern in phylogeny of the Streptomyces griseus 16S rRNA gene clade:
Tuticorin, India,” Aquatic Biosystems, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 23, 2012. use of multilocus sequence analysis for streptomycete sys-
[24] M. Benhadj, D. Gacemi-Kirane, T. Menasria, K. Guebla, and tematics,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolu-
Z. Ahmane, “Screening of rare actinomycetes isolated from tionary Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 149–159, 2008.
natural wetland ecosystem (Fetzara Lake, northeastern [39] T. P. Tourova, “Copy number of ribosomal operons in pro-
Algeria) for hydrolytic enzymes and antimicrobial activities,” karyotes and its effect on phylogenetic analyses,” Microbiol-
Journal of King Saud University-Science, vol. 31, no. 4, ogy, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 389–402, 2003.
pp. 706–712, 2019. [40] T. Coenye and P. Vandamme, “Intragenomic heterogeneity
[25] N. A. Al-Dhabi, G. A. Esmail, V. Duraipandiyan, M. Valan between multiple 16S ribosomal RNA operons in sequenced
Arasu, and M. M. Salem-Bekhit, “Isolation, identification and bacterial genomes,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 228, no. 1,
pp. 45–49, 2003.
screening of antimicrobial thermophilic Streptomyces sp. Al-
[41] N. Engene and W. H. Gerwick, “Intra-genomic 16S rRNA
Dhabi-1 isolated from Tharban hot spring, Saudi Arabia,”
gene heterogeneity in cyanobacterial genomes,” Fottea,
Extremophiles, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 2016.
vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2011.
[26] R. Shrestha, S. Khanal, P. Poudel et al., “Extended spectrum
[42] T. Větrovský and P. Baldrian, “The variability of the 16S rRNA
β-lactamase producing uropathogenic Escherichia coli and the
gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial
correlation of biofilm with antibiotics resistance in Nepal,” community analyses,” PLoS One, vol. 8, 2013.
Annals of Clinical Microbiology Antimicrobials, vol. 18, p. 42, [43] G. E. Fox, J. D. Wisotzkey, and P. Jurtshuk, “How close is
2019. close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not Be sufficient to
[27] O. Mustafa, A. U. Tamer, and A. Cem, “Antibacterial activity guarantee species identity,” International Journal of System-
of some actinomycetes isolated from farming soils of Turkey,” atic Bacteriology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 166–170, 1992.
African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 441–446, [44] J. C. Ibal, H. Q. Pham, C. E. Park, and J. H. Shin, “Information
2004. about variations in multiple copies of bacterial 16S rRNA
[28] A. Morgulis, G. Coulouris, Y. Raytselis, T. L. Madden, genes may aid in species identification,” PLoS One, vol. 14,
R. Agarwala, and R. Schäffer, “Database indexing for pro- 2019.
duction MegaBLAST searches,” Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 24, [45] D. Parrot, S. Antony-Babu, L. Intertaglia et al., “Littoral li-
pp. 1757–1764, 2008. chens as a novel source of potentially bioactive Actino-
[29] S. T. Williams, M. Goodfellow, G. Alderson, bacteria,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, 2015.
E. M. H. Wellington, P. H. A. Sneath, and M. J. Sackin, [46] S. Antony-Babu, D. Stien, V. Eparvier et al., “Multiple
“Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related gen- Streptomyces species with distinct secondary metabolomes
era,” Microbiology, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 1743–1813, 1983. have identical 16S rRNA gene sequences,” Scientific Reports,
[30] G. Ramachandran, G. Rajivgandhi, M. Maruthupandy, and vol. 7, 2017.
N. Manoharan, “Isolation and identification of antibacterial [47] P. S. Conville and F. G. Witebsky, “Analysis of multiple
compound from marine endophytic actinomycetes against differing copies of the 16S rRNA gene in five clinical isolates
multi drug resistant bacteria,” Annals of Microbiology and and three type strains of Nocardia species and implications for
Immunology, vol. 1, p. 1003, 2018. species assignment,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 45,
[31] A. Gorajana, S. Vinjamuri, B. V. V. S. N. Kurada et al., no. 4, pp. 1146–1151, 2007.
“Resistoflavine, cytotoxic compound from a marine actino- [48] Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, and N. Ramanan, “The actinomycete
mycete, Streptomyces chibaensis AUBN1/7,” Microbiological Thermobispora bispora contains two distinct types of tran-
Research, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 322–327, 2007. scriptionally active 16S rRNA genes,” Journal of Bacteriology,
[32] H. I. Zgurskaya and H. Nikaido, “Multidrug resistance vol. 179, no. 10, pp. 3270–3276, 1997.
mechanisms: drug efflux across two membranes,” Molecular [49] K. Ueda, T. Seki, T. Kudo, T. Yoshida, and M. Kataoka, “Two
Microbiology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 219–225, 2000. distinct mechanisms cause heterogeneity of 16S rRNA,”
[33] A. Sapkota, A. Thapa, A. Budhathoki, M. Sainju, P. Shrestha, Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 78–82, 1999.
and S. Aryal, “Isolation, characterization, and screening of
antimicrobial-producing actinomycetes from soil samples,”
International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2020, 2020.
[34] T. D. Gurung, C. Sherpa, V. P. Agrawal, and B. Lekhak,
“Isolation and characterization of antibacterial actinomycetes
from soil samples of Kalapatthar, Mount Everest Region,”
Nepal Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 10, pp. 173–182,
2009.
[35] K. Rai, S. Khadka, and B. Shrestha, “Actinomycetes: isolation,
characterization and screening for antimicrobial activity from
different sites of Chitwan, Nepal,” International Journal of
Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 25, 2018.