0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views9 pages

Which State To Bear Medical Expense of RTD HC Judges Justice - VS - Dave - President - The - Association - of - Retd - Judges

The Supreme Court of India is hearing a case involving the Association of Retired Judges and various respondents, with multiple applications for permissions, exemptions, and interventions filed. The court has requested an Amicus Curiae to review compliance affidavits from states regarding reimbursements for retired judges' treatments, emphasizing that non-compliance may lead to contempt proceedings. A clarification was made regarding which state government is responsible for reimbursements based on the judges' appointments and retirements, with a deadline set for states to file fresh affidavits.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views9 pages

Which State To Bear Medical Expense of RTD HC Judges Justice - VS - Dave - President - The - Association - of - Retd - Judges

The Supreme Court of India is hearing a case involving the Association of Retired Judges and various respondents, with multiple applications for permissions, exemptions, and interventions filed. The court has requested an Amicus Curiae to review compliance affidavits from states regarding reimbursements for retired judges' treatments, emphasizing that non-compliance may lead to contempt proceedings. A clarification was made regarding which state government is responsible for reimbursements based on the judges' appointments and retirements, with a deadline set for states to file fresh affidavits.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

ITEM NO.64 COURT NO.

4 SECTION X

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 425-426/2015 In W.P.(C) No. 523/2002

JUSTICE V.S. DAVE PRESIDENT,


THE ASSOCIATION OF RETD. JUDGES
OF SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURTS Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

KUSUMJIT SIDHU . & ORS. Respondent(s)

[TO BE TAKEN UP AT 2.00 P.M.]


IA No. 68417/2019 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION
IA No. 94899/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No. 66189/2019 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
IA No. 139073/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT
IA No. 131544/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 28769/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 71211/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 179718/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 150557/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE
IA No. 144183/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE
IA No. 100360/2018 - EXTENSION OF TIME
IA No. 27753/2018 - I/A TO BRING ON RECORD THE LRS
IA No. 94894/2020 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
IA No. 68420/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 113284/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 113285/2021 - MODIFICATION
IA No. 53528/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
IA No. 28203/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

Date : 15-04-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Sumit Goel, Adv.


Ms. Ruchi Krishna Chauhan, Adv.

Mr. M. P. Vinod, AOR


Signature Not Verified
M/S. Parekh & Co., AOR
Digitally signed by
KAVITA PAHUJA
Date: 2025.04.17

For Respondent(s) :Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AOR


18:17:31 IST
Reason:

Mr. Mandaar Mukesh Giri, Adv.

1
Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR
Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv.
Mr. Varij Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR

Ms. Radhika Gautam, AOR


Mr. Parijat Sinha, AOR

Mr. Amit Sharma, AOR


Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Adv.
Ms. Pallavi Barua, Adv.
Ms. Aparna Singh, Adv.
Mr. Anirudh Singh, Adv.

Mr. G. Prakash, AOR

Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AOR


Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Tripathi, Adv.

Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR

Mr. Samir Ali Khan, AOR


Mr. Pranjal Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, Adv.

Mr. Pai Amit, AOR


Mr. Kushal Dube, Adv.
Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Adv.

Mr. Krishnanand Pandeya, AOR

M/S. Plr Chambers And Co., AOR

Mr. Aravindh S., AOR


Mr. Akshay Gupta, Adv.

Mohd. Irshad Ahmad, A.A.G.


Ms. Baani Khanna, AOR
Mr. Robin Singh, Adv.
Mr. Kapil Balwani, Adv.
Ms. Tejal Nagauri, Adv.

Mr. Ramesh Babu M. R., AOR

2
Mr. P. I. Jose, AOR
Ms. G. Indira, AOR
Mr. Mahesh Thakur, AOR
Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, AOR

Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR


Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Anupama Ngangom, Adv.
Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.

Mr. Ajay Marwah, AOR

Mr. Arjun Garg, AOR


Ms. Sagun Srivastava, Adv.
Mr. Saaransh Shukla, Adv.

Ms. Mukti Chowdhary, AOR

Mr. Ahanthem Henry, Adv.


Mr. Ahanthem Rohen Singh, Adv.
Mr. Mohan Singh, Adv.
Mr. Aniket Rajput, Adv.
Ms. Khoisnam Nirmala Devi, Adv.
Mr. Yeshu Mehta, Adv.
Mr. Kumar Mihir, AOR

Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, AOR


Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Aakash Thakur, Adv.

Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR

Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AOR


Mr. Mandaar Mukesh Giri, Adv.

Mr. Shibashish Misra, AOR

Mr. Ravindra S. Garia, AOR


Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv.

Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak, AOR


Mrs. Shashi Pathak, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Tripathi, Adv.

Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR


Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv.
Mr. Varij Mishra, Adv.

3
Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR
Mr. Jayant Mohan, AOR

Ms. Devina Sehgal, AOR


Mr. Dhananjay Yadav, Adv.

Mr. M. P. Vinod, AOR


Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR

Mr. Azmat Hayat Amanullah, AOR


Ms. Rebecca Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Vishal Prasad, AOR


Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, AOR
Mr. T.K. Nayak, Adv.
Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR

Mr. Anando Mukherjee, AOR


Mr. Shwetank Singh, Adv.

Ms. Asmita Singh, AOR


Mr. Abheet Mangleek, Adv.
Mr. Tushar Nair, Adv.
Mr. Anirudh Anand, Adv.
Mr. Punishk Handa, Adv.

Mr. Ajay Pal, AOR


Ms. Aswathi M.K., AOR
Mr. Karan Sharma, AOR

Mr. Prashant Shrikant Kenjale, AOR


Mr. B Dhananjay, Adv.
Mr. Muthuvel Palani, Adv.

Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR


Mr. Nimish Arjaria, Adv.

Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR


Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR

Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv.


Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.
Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR

Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AOR


Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv.
Mr. Dhruv Yadav, Adv.

4
Mr. H. S. Parihar, AOR
Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR
Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR

Mr. Niranjan Sahu, AOR

Mr. R Venkatramani, Attorney General for India


Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G.
Mrs. V Mohana, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Rekha Pandey, Adv.
Mr. R.S. Chauhan, Adv.
Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR
Ms. Ameyvikraman Thanvi, Adv.
Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv.
Mr. Anmol Chandan, Adv.
Mrs. Swati Gildyal, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Kartikay Aggarwal, Adv.

Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR

Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR


Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR

Ms. Enakshi Mukhopadhyay Siddhanta, AOR


Mr. Ravi Kumar S., Adv.
Mr. P.s. Sridhar Raj, Adv.

Dr. Monika Gusain, Sr. Adv.


Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR
Mr. Hariom Yaduvanshi, Adv.
Mr. Arjun Yaduvanshi, Adv.
Ms. S. Harini, Adv.
Mr. Avi Dhankhar, Adv.
Mr. Vansmani Tripathi, Adv.
Ms. Aahana Jaiswal, Adv.
Ms. Drishti Rawal, Adv.
Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Adv.
Ms. Drishti Saraf, Adv.

Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR


Mr. Sujay Jain, Adv.

Mr. Karan Bharihoke, AOR

Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR


Mr. Raghavendra M. Kulkarni, Adv.

5
Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR
Mr. R Venkataramani, Attorney General for India
Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G.
Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv.
Ms. Ameyavikrama Thanvi, Adv.
Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Kartikeya Aggarwal, Adv.
Mr. Swati Ghildiyal, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Aor, Adv.

Mr. Piyush Hans, D.A.G.


Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, AOR
Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv.
Mr. Manoj Kumar Dwivedi, Adv.

Mr. Abhay Anil Anturkar, Adv.


Mr. Dhruv Tank, Adv.
Mr. Aniruddha Awalgaonkar, Adv.
Mr. Sarthak Mehrotra, Adv.
Mr. Bhagwant Deshpande, Adv.
Ms. Subhi Pastor, Adv.
Ms. Surbhi Kapoor, AOR

Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR


Mr. Anil Shrivastav, AOR

Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR


Mr. Santhosh K, Adv.
Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv.
Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv.

Mr. Bhupendra Pratap Singh, D.A.G.


Mr. Sarthak Raizada Ga, Adv.
Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, AOR

Mr. T. Harish Kumar, AOR


Mr. Subham Kothari, Adv.
Mr. Bharathi Subramanian, Adv.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR

Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR


Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.
Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Adv.
Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv.

6
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AOR

Mrs. Garima Prashad A.ag, Sr. Adv.


Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, AOR
Ms. Pallavi Kumari, Adv.

Mr. Kunal Mimani, AOR


Ms. Shraddha Chirania, Adv.

Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR


M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co, AOR
Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR

Mr. R. Venkataramani, Attorney General for India


Mr. K.M.nataraj, A.S.G.
Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv.
Mr. Ameyavikrama Thanvi, Adv.
Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Kartikeya Aggarwal, Adv.
Mr. Varun Chugh, Adv.
Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Adv.
Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AOR
Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma (AOR), Adv.

Mr. Yashvardhan, Adv.


Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR

Mr. T.G.N. Nair, Adv.


Ms. Samyuktha H. Nair, Adv.

Mr. Baldev Singh, Adv.


Mr. Divyansh Thakur, Adv.
Mr. Rishabh Kr. Singh, Adv.
Mr. Vivek Punia, Adv.
Mr. Vishal, Adv.

Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv.


Mr. Shiv Bhatnagar, Adv.
Ms. Y. Pallvi Hooda, Adv.
Mr. Yuvraj Nandal, Adv.
Ms. Tannu, Adv.

7
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R

List on 29th April, 2025 at 2.00 p.m.

We request the learned senior counsel appointed as Amicus to

go through the compliance affidavits filed by the States reporting

compliance with the directions issued under earlier orders as well

as the order dated 18th May, 2025. We request the learned Amicus to

submit a chart to this Court indicating the extent of compliances

made by various States. We are putting the State to the notice

that if we find non-compliance, action under the Contempt of Courts

Act, 1981 will be initiated.

Our attention is invited to paragraph 9 of our order dated 18 th

February, 2025 which reads thus:

“9. We also make it clear that all the reimbursements,


as directed under the orders of the Court, shall be made
by the concerned State Governments. When we say the
concerned State Governments, it will be the State
Government where the seat of the High Court is situated
from which the learned Judge has retired. Obviously, the
concerned State Government shall reimburse even if the
treatment is taken in a hospital outside that State.”

It is pointed out that there are cases of Judges who are

appointed in one particular High Court but have retired as judges

of some other High Court as they were transferred. Therefore,

direction contained in paragraph 9 is clarified as under:

“When we say the concerned State Government, it will be the

State Government where the seat of the High Court is situated in

which the retired Judge was firstly appointed or the State

Government where the seat of the High Court is situated from which

the learned Judge has retired.”

8
We permit the States to file fresh affidavits within a period

of one week from today. The States will forward copies of the

affidavit to the learned Amicus Curiae.

(KAVITA PAHUJA) (AVGV RAMU)


ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

You might also like